Title: Tackling the Challenge: Writing a Problem of Evil Research Paper

Writing a thesis is no small feat, especially when delving into complex topics like the Problem of
Evil. This philosophical dilemma has perplexed minds for centuries, making it a daunting task to
navigate through various theories, arguments, and counterarguments.

The Problem of Evil explores the coexistence of evil and suffering with the concept of an
omnipotent, omnibenevolent deity, posing profound questions about the nature of God and the
existence of evil in the world. Crafting a research paper on this topic requires meticulous research,
critical analysis, and coherent argumentation.

One of the biggest challenges of writing a Problem of Evil thesis lies in synthesizing diverse
philosophical perspectives while maintaining clarity and coherence. From the classical formulations
by philosophers like Epicurus and Augustine to modern interpretations by scholars such as Alvin
Plantinga and John Hick, navigating through these complex theories demands intellectual rigor and
analytical skills.

Moreover, addressing the nuanced nuances of theological, ethical, and metaphysical dimensions adds
another layer of complexity to the writing process. It requires a deep understanding of philosophical
concepts, theological doctrines, and ethical frameworks, often leading writers to grapple with
intricate philosophical dilemmas and paradoxes.

Amidst these challenges, seeking expert assistance can be invaluable. ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ offers
professional academic writing services tailored to tackle intricate topics like the Problem of Evil.
With a team of experienced writers well-versed in philosophy and theology, ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔
ensures meticulously researched, well-structured, and insightful research papers that meet the highest
academic standards.

By entrusting your Problem of Evil research paper to ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔, you can alleviate the
daunting task of navigating through complex philosophical terrain. Our dedicated writers will
meticulously craft your thesis, offering coherent arguments, insightful analysis, and meticulous
research, ensuring a compelling and academically rigorous paper.

Don't let the complexities of writing a Problem of Evil research paper overwhelm you. Order from
⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ today and embark on a journey towards academic excellence.
My overall aim, then, is to draw on various strands of the skeptical theism literature to present a
challenge for all Christian theists, not just those in the skeptical theist camp, while at the same time
revealing some important limitations of skeptical theism. This does not, of course, mean that God has
planned the particular challenges and hardships that we each face. There is another move open to the
theist, she may say that even with unnecessary or unjust suffering in the mortal world, a sufferer
could still meet her just reward in the afterlife. If God created the world from nothing, then there is
nothing beyond His control so for whatever reason, God must be the creator of evil and suffering.
Despite the compatibility, they also have their differences but this. More exactly, I argue that the
collection of apparently pointless evil in the world provides strong evidence for there being truly
pointless evil, despite the fact that seeing no justifying reason for some particular instance of evil is
no evidence whatsoever for it truly being pointless. It is therefore improbable to say that evil or God
exist. It is therefore agreeable to many people that in this world there is better than evil which makes
life worth living. The tutor announces that he has already decided that 75 per cent of the class will
pass the examination and that 25 per cent will fail. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure
quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this
resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. If there any omissions in the notes
please do get in touch and I will send an updated copy. Penelhum discusses Hume’s ideas by
proposing two scenarios that fit the reasoning that might cause. Alternatively, if God has the power
to control evil and wishes to, but has not, then it would mean that He is not aware of the existence of
evil. The next example illustrates a situation where lack of free-will constitutes a loss. The problem of
evil also gives way to the notion that if hell exists then would we be able to then say is God evil for
sending anyone there to be condemned for a punishment in eternity. When thinking about evil it can
be dark and out of which no good can come. This idea of a moral training ground is sometimes
referred to as, the vale of soul-making defence. For example, gravity can sometimes be harmful but
at other times it may also benefit us. From these it follows that a good omnipotent thing eliminates
evil completely. He says that the lack of comfort and opulence is not the cause of evil, because God
as big as a creator he is, can always create more. To criticise would be to say that God should have
created more than he did which doesn’t make sense; how is anyone to know how much more should
have been created. There is not just one piece that fits into the puzzle. These three statements cannot
all be true so it would seem that one of them is false, but since we know evil and suffering exist the
inconsistency must lie in one of the other 2 points. Immorality and morality must be defined and
divided as acceptable and not acceptable concepts. Our customer service team will review your
report and will be in touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 22 February 2018 Share this Share through email
Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest
jerseyperson 4.59 317 reviews Not the right resource. However, the case for skeptical theism is often
kept at an intuitive level: no one has offered an explicit argument for the truth of skeptical theism.
Natural evil punishes us for the destruction of the natural order by human action. Evil does not also
emanate from God but from man and his actions. Bundle OCR RELIGIOUS STUDIES FULL
Philosophy AS ESSAY PLANS These essay plans will help you achieve top marks in the OCR
Religious Studies A level examination. ?25.00 Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating
is required to reflect your happiness. Grendel attacks the people of Herot for twelve years.
A solution to the problem of evil is also derived from the fact that evil is not a creature but a bad
choice or consequence of a bad choice. In concluding that evil is necessary, the conclusion that it is
morally wrong for an entity to fail to act in eradicating evil if that ability is available is contradicted
when evil becomes this necessary component of good. Our customer service team will review your
report and will be in touch. ?3.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?3.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 18 May 2020 Share this Share through email Share
through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Caitlin's A
Level Revision Shop Not the right resource. It is difficult to muster believe in a cause if there is no
adversarial challenge. He states that evil is necessary in a created world as only the uncreated creator
can be perfect, his creations are susceptible to change. Our customer service team will review your
report and will be in touch. ?3.50 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?3.50 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 4 December 2019 Share this Share through email
Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest
Anthony A's Shop 2.43 7 reviews Not the right resource. See other similar resources ?5.00 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. See other similar
resources ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for.
Theists do not see fewer evils in the world than atheists, they see more.” (Adams, p. 70) Sin becomes
relevant to the theist in the examination of the existence of evil. Not an earthly paradise devoid of
any pain or suffering, without problems, difficulties, uncertainties, setback, disasters of any kind. In
the simplest form of this argument is that God is omnipotent, he is wholly good and yet evil exists
(Rowe 30). As evil acts as an opposing force and as a supportive force, it is still termed for acts that
are against good, so therefore, suggesting the necessity of evil can raise serious objections. A
theodicy is a theory that justifies why God allows evil without qualifying the attributes of the God of
Classical Theism. He says that the lack of comfort and opulence is not the cause of evil, because God
as big as a creator he is, can always create more. God does not just let evil occur, but it is most
relatable to one of the gifts God has bestowed upon us as humans, that is the gift for free will.
Included is a full pack of notes for all topics under AQA A-Level Philosophy, specification 7172.
New York: Cambridge University Press. 23 December 2008. It is therefore agreeable to many people
that in this world there is better than evil which makes life worth living. Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus.
(2007) Philosophy of Religion. For the theist, in believing in God, believes both that God created the
world. Having the freedom to choose is so important that the resulting evil is inconsequential.
According to Augustine, the perfect God created a flawless world where evil and suffering did not
exist, and that God is not responsible for the existence of evil as it is not a substance, but in fact a
deprivation of good. First of all, let us discard the notion that God is blamed for the existence of evil
in the world. The basic idea of the problem of evil is simple enough for anyone to understand, but
there's still some philosophical work to be done regarding it—some general work about epistemology
and some specific work about God and evil. Because a good God would not create evil, the critic
argues, God does not exist.” (Siniscalchi, 2015). In this play, most of the evil happenings takeplace
in the dark. In this theory, the morality of allowing evil is justified by the resulting freedom of
choice created by that existence. Religious Notions of Evil and Moral Notions of Evil are Not
Mutually Exclusive Religious notions of evil and moral notions of evil are not mutually exclusive.
From these it follows that a good omnipotent thing eliminates evil completely. There is also positive
evidence on the existence of God: the evidence in the design in nature, the historical pieces of
evidence on scripture reliability and lastly Jesus Christ’s resurrection.
All things can be defined with meaning if that meaning can be gleaned from any one person. Despite
the compatibility, they also have their differences but this. Zabzebski, in her Philosophy of Religion,
Mackie puts forth several theories on how to solve the problem. You can download the paper by
clicking the button above. Existence of evil therefore puts a believer in a dilemma over the properties
of God. In concluding that evil is necessary, the conclusion that it is morally wrong for an entity to
fail to act in eradicating evil if that ability is available is contradicted when evil becomes this
necessary component of good. The moral is what would be easiest to relate to what pertains to our
free will. Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.
Fionn O'Donovan Sceptical theism is a particular strategy for undermining arguments that the
existence of suffering is strong evidence against the existence of God. Key philosophers are also
highlighted in a different text font as well as quotes - knowing these are KEY for the exam and
therefore clearly distinguishable. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in
touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later Last updated 7 April 2021 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Learning With Liz's Shop 4.25 4
reviews Not the right resource. Macbeth: Darkness, Evil and TragedyMacbeth is a play full of
darkness, evil, and tragedy. Under these circumstances, because the outcome is determined, there
would seem to be little point in sitting the examination or even studying for it. This is 100% legal.
You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you. Alternatively, if
God has the power to control evil and wishes to, but has not, then it would mean that He is not
aware of the existence of evil. In these examples, one sees that evil is defined by an action against
the will and instruction of God. Maybe even more importantly we ask ourselves why does God let so
many bad things happen, or why is this happening to me. Of course, the worthy ideal of leaving a
better place behind has to be tempered with a degree of realism. On this premise, it would not be
within God’s will to eradicate evil. He uses an analogy of blindness to illustrate his meaning, as
blindness itself is not an entity but an absence of sight. The easiest way to recognize this would be
one of the sacraments. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only
customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it
violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in
touch. ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later Last updated 6 October 2019 Share this Share through email Share through twitter
Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Ashleighschuman's Shop
2.50 9 reviews Not the right resource. It could be that some people can never sense their utmost
dependence on God except by experiencing the hard pain they do in their lives. Therefore, His
omnipotence would not be in question. The actions may be considered evil but they were normalised
by the sense of responsibility felt by the guards. Mackie defined the problem of evil by bringing
forward thought on the following conundrum. It presents itself as a philosophical problem as it
compels the believer to accept conflicting claims that are logically impossible to reconcile. This paper
describes the topic to the relevance and balance between good and evil. If there was no evil, people
would not be able to compare it with the goodness or deity.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Additionally he already knows who will pass and who will fail the exam. For every
thought I think we have, there are a deeper picture and a deeper meaning. Penelhum quotes Pike as
he describes three propositions that are extensions of Mackie’s theory. Evil does not also emanate
from God but from man and his actions. In this way, God’s reasoning for allowing evil in the world
may have a yet unknown benefit. An omnipotent, all-powerful, God could be seen as the answer to
many problems of Faith, for example explaining the resurrection in Christianity as well as the virgin
birth and the miracles. Download Free PDF View PDF Skeptical Theism Proved (Journal of the
American Philosophical Association, forthcoming) Perry Hendricks Skeptical theism is a popular
response to arguments from evil. Opposing to moral evil there is physical, and physical also described
as natural evil in the text are things such as earthquakes and natural disasters. In other words,
because God only does that which is logical, He could not confer free-will and also prohibit evil.
Macbeth murders King Duncan which was his first steptowards devastation. Is skeptical theism
committed to global skepticism, including skepticism about ordinary, commonplace beliefs. Macbeth:
Darkness, Evil and TragedyMacbeth is a play full of darkness, evil, and tragedy. From a biblical
perspective, the author argues that if God is the creator of all that exist then He created evil because
evil also exist. The sacrament of baptism is seen as a blessing to us. Just as in our schooldays, some
would learn faster than others and, in the same way, the slower ones would need more time to
develop. God would be justified in sending everyone to hell for being guilty of the Original Sin, the
fact that some go to heaven shows God’s goodness. Moreover, there are two types of evil: moral and
physical. The most normal and effective way to shed light on the open-minded skepticism of Voltaire
is to thoroughly examine one of his works which remains popular far and wide—Candide. In
discovering evil, one must look at the impact of its existence on the development of the supremacy,
and the triumphs that good can attain in the presence of evil. In John L. Mackie’s exploration of evil,
a look at the defining characteristics evil, good, and omnipotence, carry the topic to the relevance
and balance between good and evil. Armed with free-will, mankind has the opportunity to counter
evil (be it natural or human). As a result of many roles and tools that philosophy plays, different
meanings of philosophy have arisen. Not an earthly paradise devoid of any pain or suffering, without
problems, difficulties, uncertainties, setback, disasters of any kind. The basic idea of the problem of
evil is simple enough for anyone to understand, but there's still some philosophical work to be done
regarding it—some general work about epistemology and some specific work about God and evil.
Here, I make the case for a new, refined form of sceptical theism, which avoids these moral problems
by specifically questioning our ability to evaluate the particular kinds of decisions God has to make,
rather than making sceptical claims about our moral knowledge in general, like conventional sceptical
theists. It presents itself as a philosophical problem as it compels the believer to accept conflicting
claims that are logically impossible to reconcile. A theist can sometimes be faced with justifying both
types of evil as natural evils like tsunamis and hurricanes are often the cause of people committing
moral evils like looting. Full explanations of the philosophical topics listed in the specification. Each
document contains detailed bullet point notes of ALL information needed for the individual topics of
the first year Philosophy OCR. These three statements cannot all be true so it would seem that one of
them is false, but since we know evil and suffering exist the inconsistency must lie in one of the
other 2 points.
You can download the paper by clicking the button above. A condition of God allowing free-will
means that man (that is man in the biblical sense) must have the freedom to choose between a good
action and an evil action, it simply wouldn't be logical for God to endow mankind with free-will only
to remove freedom of action when an evil act is about to be committed. These three statements
cannot all be true so it would seem that one of them is false, but since we know evil and suffering
exist the inconsistency must lie in one of the other 2 points. This document also includes a bullet-
point essay plan to help students understand how to structure their essays for maximum marks. It
presents itself as a philosophical problem as it compels the believer to accept conflicting claims that
are logically impossible to reconcile. According to this argument, there is no way both of these
assertions can be true. Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading
Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. Mankind questions, predicts and influences events,
so illness is treated and cured and natural disasters are predicted and defences built. This leads us to
our faith, we need to let our faith be stronger and ask for the Lord’s forgiveness. However, since
adultery is a specific act of sin, it is evil. In the literal meaning, philosophy refers to the love of
wisdom. It is also a diverse problem; evil manifests itself in many different ways, demanding
separate explanations. The reason that evil continues is either because that force cannot or that it will
not destroy its adversarial force. After explaining that argument, I make the case that the argument is
untouched by traditional skeptical theism. First of all, let us discard the notion that God is blamed
for the existence of evil in the world. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for
our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to
let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. They both believe that without development our
goodness would be without value, we would be automatons. Despite the compatibility, they also
have their differences but this. This can be used as an argument for the non-existence of God.
However, the case for skeptical theism is often kept at an intuitive level: no one has offered an
explicit argument for the truth of skeptical theism. The evil force told them that God denied the
luxury of eating that fruit. For the theist, in believing in God, believes both that God created the
world. The trouble has come from the idea that the Absolute is a moral person. Criticisms and
occasionally counter-criticism of the topics. Evil For Evil's Sake: An Analysis of the Nature of Evil
In William Shakespeare's Hamlet Jake West What is it to be good. There is not just one piece that fits
into the puzzle. Areas covered in the lesson: Evaluating students views on evil in the world The
Logical Problem of Evil (Inconsistent Triad) Independent activities using the worksheet provided.
There are around 25 original resources here, and should suit students of all abilities as well as
teachers who are either new to the topic or relatively seasoned and just looking for some new ideas.
The effects that evil may have can run from the physical experiences of pain, to the spiritual
influences that cause disturbances. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's
good to leave some feedback.
Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. Carlton, Victoria:
Blackwell Publishing. 2008 December 22. Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download
PDF Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. Penelhum quotes Pike as he describes
three propositions that are extensions of Mackie’s theory. After all, what would mankind lack if free-
will did not exist. This paper describes the topic to the relevance and balance between good and evil.
Most immediately, there is suffering from the bitter taste, but the action was done with what Pike
calls a “morally sufficient reason” (Zagzebski, p. 33) that will have long term benefit. Reviews Select
overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. Macbeth murders King
Duncan which was his first steptowards devastation. From that standpoint we get a clearer
understanding of what an all-knowing (omniscient) God can do. Write a review Update existing
review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. The problem of evil rises when we
try to reconcile the omnipotent and the infinitely good nature of God, with the reality of evil in the
world. Do we relate to evil as a person, the act of what a person does, or simply just as a thought.
Macbeth: Darkness, Evil and TragedyMacbeth is a play full of darkness, evil, and tragedy. This idea
reinforces the existence of God, it does not diminish that possibility. See other similar resources
?3.50 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Peterson,
Michael L. (1998). God and Evil: An Introduction to the Issues. The effects that evil may have can
run from the physical experiences of pain, to the spiritual influences that cause disturbances. Mackie
says, “first order evil (e.g. pain) may be justified as a logical necessary component in secondary good
(e.g. sympathy) while second order evil (e.g. cruelty) is not justified, but is so ascribed to human
beings that God cannot be held responsible for it.” (Zagzebski, p. 33). This argument allows that in
the giving of free will, the adaptation of responsibility was automatic. As Mackie asserts, The
problem of evil can be simplified thus: God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists
(Mackie, n. For the theist, in believing in God, believes both that God created the world. Or in some
cases, this is where people lose faith or science tries to disprove the pure existence of God at all.
“Some philosophers have argued that the presence of evil disproves the existence of God. These
three statements cannot all be true so it would seem that one of them is false, but since we know evil
and suffering exist the inconsistency must lie in one of the other 2 points. Nevertheless, attractive as
the arrangement sounds, the problem of a Utopian universe is destined not to properly serve God's
purpose of creating a virtuous world. Furthermore, also included is a collection of essay plans. More
so if God is all powerful, all loving, and evil still exists why does God not step in. There are certain
suggested reasons as to why God allows some horrendous evils to exist in this world. This resource
hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this
resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. No
one, not even God, could interfere in a choice between good and evil. Upload Read for free FAQ
and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What is Scribd.
There is not just one piece that fits into the puzzle. To couple this idea with the idea of free will is to
make an argument for the virtue of evil. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you
with the best. A decision that is contrary to God’s tenants is a sin, which is an act of evil. According
to this argument, there is no way both of these assertions can be true. Mankind, having free-will, is
neither an automaton nor mildly accepting of 'God's Will'. Ireneaus claims that the evil and suffering
will eventually be overcome and everyone will attain God’s likeness and reside in Heaven. This idea
reinforces the existence of God, it does not diminish that possibility. According to Mackie, this is a
very limited view of evil. While Hume has influenced a great deal of speculation on the existence of
God, the problem of evil, in its very nature, suggests that God must exist. How then does one say
God exists if God created all, but in turn did not create evil. In an omnipotent and omniscient
position, this would seem a contradiction to the essence of God. Grendel attacks the people of Herot
for twelve years. This set of resources comes from around 100 hours worth of work and hopefully
contains a fairly wide variety of tasks and stimuli, as well as thorough revision notes and an interim
assessment. Moreover, there are two types of evil: moral and physical. A theist would presumably
add that it has to be that God would want humanity to freely choose Him as the ultimate being, for
without free-will any relationship between God and humanity would simply be reduced to the
unsatisfactory bond of a servant who is obliged, without any knowledge or appreciation of
consequences, to submit to his master's bidding. If we know only of the famine we might perceive it
as a natural disaster but, on the other hand, if we recognised the farmer's indolence, we could
reasonably conclude that we are suffering from a human evil. Evil within us as in we are by nature
sinful has been recognized since biblical times. Zagzebski observes that, “A common reply is that,
even though Mackie is right that it is possible for a universe to be totally good, the creatures in such
a world would not know that it was good.”.”(Zagzebski, p. 150). From this point of view, the
knowledge of evil is important for an intellectual understanding of good. I then consider DePoe's
positive skeptical theism, arguing that while DePoe’s view might provide a response to my
argument, it entangles the theist in worries about divine deception. Furthermore, once God has
granted free-will, and considering the myriad of choices mankind has to make during his existence,
either collectively or individually, it must be that at some time during mankind's existence an evil
choice is made. The problem of evil can therefore be resolved by a practical step of transformation
from doing badly, to. This scheme then requires that, in order to provide incentive for improvement,
there is the possibility of suffering. Humans also couldn’t be created in a paradise or else qualities
such as courage would not be attainable and there would be no development as good and evil would
be indistinguishable. For an optimal experience, please switch to the latest version of Google
Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox. That is how I feel would be the easiest to
resemble understanding and processing the idea of evil. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To
ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report
this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Having the freedom to choose is
so important that the resulting evil is inconsequential. He uses an analogy of blindness to illustrate
his meaning, as blindness itself is not an entity but an absence of sight. It is also a diverse problem;
evil manifests itself in many different ways, demanding separate explanations.