Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Litigation Notes 2023 - Tugee
Civil Litigation Notes 2023 - Tugee
TOPIC 1:
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF THE COURSE
AREAS TO COVER
To acquaint the students with practical skills for the practice of law, with
a specific focus on civil litigation.
The course outline indicates the required reading material for each
topic, consisting mainly of various rules of procedure and case law.
Students should have copies of, inter alia:
The Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
The Civil Procedure Act and Rules.
The Magistrates’ Courts Act.
The Employment and Labour Relations Court Act.
The Environment and Land Court Act.
TOPIC 2:
TAKING OF INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL LITIGATION
AREAS TO COVER
The primary purpose of the initial client interview is to identify the client’s
problem and to gather enough facts to identify a range of appropriate
ways to address the problem.
The interview also serves as an opportunity to develop a relationship of
trust and open communication between the advocate and client.
An effective initial client interview is critical for client intake, and is an
important step to providing a client-centered experience.
Open-ended general questions prompt the client to tell their story in their
own words. Begin with open-ended questions in obtaining an initial
narrative response to generate broad, general information.
After asking the open ended, general questions, you should ask more
specific and narrow questions to fill in important details that were not
initially addressed by the client or to clarify facts that were addressed by
the client.
Avoid asking leading questions unless you are confirming facts that were
previously provided by the client or you are trying to obtain information
that the client may be reluctant to provide.
Be an active listener.
James Tugee, 2023
FACT GATHERING (3)
Be professional.
Manage expectations.
Repeat the facts as you understand them (in your own words) and let
the client confirm if your understanding is correct. It allows the client to
clarify anything you may have misunderstood.
Make the client feel comfortable.
Communicate clearly.
Take good notes.
The client makes the decision, usually with the advocate’s guidance.
Various legal and non-legal factors may affect the decision, including:
The existence of a cause of action.
The feasibility of the intended suit (prospects of success, practicality, cost-benefit analysis,
etc.).
Time limitation (limitation of actions).
Other contractual dispute resolution mechanism, e.g. arbitration, negotiation, mediation.
The ultimate goal of the intended litigation.
Public perception and reputation.
The need to maintain relationships with the intended defendant(s).
Possible effects of the litigation on relationships with third parties.
James Tugee, 2023
D. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
Cause of action: legal claim that entitles a party to seek judicial relief.
Litigation should be pursued only where a legally recognized right to
relief exists.
Pursuant to Order 2 rule 15(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules, at any
stage of proceedings the court may order to be struck out any
pleading if it discloses no reasonable cause of action.
DT Dobie & Co (K) Ltd v Muchina [1982] KLR:
“[A] reasonable cause of action means a cause of action with
some chance of success when… only the allegations in the plaint
are considered.”
James Tugee, 2023
EXISTENCE OF A CAUSE OF ACTION (2)
A statute of limitations is a law that sets the maximum period within which
parties involved in a dispute should initiate legal proceedings from the date
that the cause of action arises.
Various laws provide time limits for pursuing specified causes of action, e.g.:
Limitation of Actions Act: Prescribes limitation periods for various causes of actions, as
follows:
i. 6 years for, inter alia, actions founded on contract; actions to enforce a recognizance;
and actions to enforce an award. [Section 4(1)].
ii. 3 years for actions founded on tort, other than defamation [section 4(2)].
iii. 12 months for an action for defamation (libel or slander) [Section 4(2)].
iv. 12 years for an action upon a judgment [Section 4(4)].
v. 12 years for actions to recover land [Section 7].
vi. 6 years for actions to recover rent [Section 8].
James Tugee, 2023
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS (2)
Public Authorities Limitation Act: “An Act of Parliament to provide for the limitation
of proceedings against the Government...”
i. 12 months for proceedings founded on tort [Section 3(1)].
ii. 3 years for proceedings founded on contract [Section 3(2)].
Employment Act: Limitation period of 3 years for actions arising from the Act or a
contract of service in general. In the case of continuing injury or damage, the
limitation period is 12 months from the cessation thereof [Section 90].
TOPIC 3:
COURTS AND JURISDICTION
AREAS TO COVER
The Owners of the Motor Vessel Lilian ‘S’ v Caltex Kenya Limited [1989]
KLR 1:
“Jurisdiction is everything. Without it, a court has no power to make one more step.
Where a court has no jurisdiction, there would be no basis for a continuation of
proceedings pending other evidence. A court of law downs tools in respect of the
matter before it the moment it holds the opinion that it is without jurisdiction.”
Civil Appeal No. 244 of 2010 Phoenix of E.A. Assurance Company
Limited v S. M. Thiga t/a Newspaper Service [2019] eKLR:
“Jurisdiction is primordial in every suit. It has to be there when the suit is filed in the first
place. If a suit is filed without jurisdiction, the only remedy is to withdraw it and file a
compliant one in the court seized of jurisdiction. A suit filed devoid of jurisdiction is
dead on arrival and cannot be remedied. Without jurisdiction, the Court cannot
confer jurisdiction to itself. ”
James Tugee, 2023
E. OBJECTIONS TO JURISDICTION
A suit ought to be instituted in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it. Where
there more subordinate courts than one with jurisdiction within the same county
competent to try it, a suit may be instituted in any one of such subordinate courts if the
party instituting the suit or his advocate certifies that he believes that a point of law is
involved or that any other good and sufficient reason exists. [Section 11, Civil
Procedure Act (CPA)].
A suit involving immovable property that is situate in Kenya is to be instituted in the
court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate. This is subject to
the pecuniary or other limitations prescribed by any law. Where a suit is to obtain relief
respecting or compensation for wrong to immovable property held by or on behalf of
the defendant and the relief sought can entirely be obtained through the defendant’s
personal obedience, it may also be instituted in the court within the local limits of
whose jurisdiction the defendant actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business,
or personally works for gain. [Section 12, CPA].
James Tugee, 2023
PLACE OF SUING (2)
An objection to the place of suing is raised in the court of first instance. No such
objection may be allowed on appeal unless it was taken in the court of first instance
and there has been a consequent failure of justice. [Section 16, CPA]
Where a suit may be instituted in any one of two or more subordinate courts, and is
instituted in one of those courts, any defendant or the court of its own motion may
apply to the High Court to have the suit transferred to another court. The High Court
shall, after considering any objections, determine in which of the courts the suit shall
proceed. [Section 17, CPA]
Pursuant to section 18 of the CPA, the High Court may, on the application of any of
the parties or of its own motion, at any stage:
Transfer any suit, appeal or other proceedings pending before it for trial or disposal to any
court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of it; or
Withdraw any suit or other proceeding pending in any court subordinate to it and thereafter
try or dispose of it, or transfer it to any subordinate court competent to try and dispose of it,
or retransfer it for trial or disposal to the same court from which it was withdrawn.
James Tugee, 2023
CIVIL LITIGATION
TOPIC 4:
THE OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE IN CIVIL LITIGATION
AREAS TO COVER
One of the common criticisms of the common law adversarial system is the
emphasis on procedural as opposed to the substantive law.
It became necessary to find a way of ensuring that the procedures in the
administration of justice would not lead to a miscarriage of justice. This was
done through the overriding objective, also known as the oxygen principle.
The overriding objective requires that each case should be treated
proportionally in relation to size, importance and complexity of the claim;
and the financial situation of the parties. The courts ought to consider the
overriding objective when they make rulings, give directions and interpret
procedural rules. Substance should be favoured over procedure.
Closer home, substantive justice was often denied in civil litigation due
to overemphasis on procedural law.
Courts started to make observations on the need to give substantive
justice greater emphasis. Hancox J, for instance, stated in Githere v
Kimungu [1976-1985] EA 101, that the relation of rules of practice to the
administration of justice is intended to be that of a handmaiden rather
than a mistress and that the Court should not be too far bound and tied
by the rules, which are intended as general rules of procedure, as to be
compelled to do that which will cause injustice in a particular case.
Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v IEBC & 6 others [2013] eKLR:
“… I am not in the least persuaded that Article 159 of the Constitution and the oxygen
principles which both command courts to seek to do substantial justice in an efficient,
proportionate and cost-effective manner and to eschew defeatist technicalities were
ever meant to aid in the overthrow or destruction of rules of procedure and to create
an anarchical free-for-all in the administration of justice. This Court, indeed all courts,
must never provide succor and cover to parties who exhibit scant respect for rules
and timelines. Those rules and timelines serve to make the process of judicial
adjudication and determination fair, just, certain and even-handed. Courts cannot
aid in the bending or circumventing of rules and a shifting of goal posts for, while it
may seem to aid one side, it unfairly harms the innocent party who strives to abide by
the rules. I apprehend that it is in the even-handed and dispassionate application of
rules that courts give assurance that there is a clear method in the manner in which
things are done so that outcomes can be anticipated with a measure of confidence,
certainty and clarity where issues of rules and their application are concerned…”
(Emphasis added)
James Tugee, 2023
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE (4)
The application of the overriding objective principle does not operate to uproot
established principles and procedures but to embolden the court to be guided
by a broad sense of justice and fairness.
In applying or interpreting the law or rules made thereunder, the court has a duty
to ensure that the application or interpretation given to any rule will facilitate the
just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of dispute.
The overriding objective principle is intended to re-energize the process of the
court and encourage good management of cases and appeals.
The principal aim of the overriding objective principle is to give the court greater
latitude to overcome any past technicalities which might hinder the attainment of
the overriding objective.
The overriding objective principle does not cover situations aimed at subverting
the expeditious disposal of cases or appeals, mistakes or lapses of counsel, or
negligent acts, or dilatory tactics or acts constituting abuse of the court process.
James Tugee, 2023
E. SANCTIONS FOR CONTRAVENING THE
“O2” PRINCIPLE
Group presentation and class discussion.
TOPIC 5:
PARTIES TO A SUIT
AREAS TO COVER
Identify and distinguish the various main parties to civil proceedings, the
nature of proceedings in which they are involved, and their roles in
those proceedings:
Plaintiff.
Petitioner.
Claimant.
Applicant.
Defendant.
Respondent.
Under the Mutunga Rules, a person may, with leave of the court make
an oral or written application to be joined as an interested party. A
court may also on its own motion join any interested party to the
proceedings before it. See rule 7.
Rule 2 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020: "interested party" means a
person who has an identifiable stake or legal interest or duty in the
proceedings, who may be prejudiced if not joined, but is not an original
party to the proceedings.
The Supreme Court defined an interested party in Trusted Society of
Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemo & 5 others [2014] eKLR.
James Tugee, 2023
INTERESTED PARTY (3)
Rule 24 of the Supreme Court Rules provides that a person may, within
seven days of filing a response in any proceedings, apply for leave to
be joined as an interested party.
The application must include:
a description of the interested party;
a depiction of such prejudice as the interested party would suffer if the intervention
was denied; and
the grounds or submissions to be advanced by the interested party, their relevance
to the proceedings, and their departures from the standpoint of the parties.
“Amicus curiae” literally translated from Latin is "friend of the court." The
plural is "amici curiae." Generally, it refers to a person or group that is not
a party to an action, but has a strong interest in the matter.
The Black’s Law Dictionary defines an amicus curiae as “a person who is
not a party to a lawsuit but who petitions the court or is requested by
the court to file a brief in the action because that person has a strong
interest in the subject matter.”
The Supreme Court clarified the role of an amicus in Presidential
Election Petition No.5 of 2013. An amicus ought not to be partisan. He is
a ‘neutral’ party admitted to the proceedings to aid the court in
reaching an ‘informed’ decision, either way.
James Tugee, 2023
AMICUS CURIAE (2)
Rule 19 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020 provides that the Court may
on its own motion, or at the request of any party, permit a person with
particular expertise to appear in any matter as a friend of the court.
Before admitting a person as a friend of the court, the court considers
proven expertise of the person; independence and impartiality of the
person; or the public interest.
An amicus has no interest in the decision being made either way, but
seeks that it be legal, well-informed, and in the interest of justice and
the public expectation. See Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v
Mumo Matemo & 5 others [2014] eKLR
James Tugee, 2023
B. CAPACITY TO SUE AND TO BE SUED
Natural persons.
Adults of sound mind.
Minors and people of unsound mind.
Companies.
Partnerships.
General partnerships.
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs).
Trusts.
Agents.
Government.
James Tugee, 2023
C. JOINDER, NON-JOINDER AND MISJOINDER
The plaintiff may at his option join as parties to the same suit all or any of the persons
severally, or jointly and severally, liable on any one contract.
Where the plaintiff is in doubt as to the persons from whom he is entitled to obtain
redress, he may join two or more defendants in order that the question as to which of
the defendants is liable, and to what extent, may be determined as between all
parties.
Misjoinder is the improper inclusion of one or more parties as plaintiffs or defendants.
Non-joinder is the failure to include a party that ordinarily ought to be included in the
proceedings.
A suit is not defeated by reason of misjoinder or non-joinder of parties. The court may in
every suit deal with the matter in controversy so far as regards the rights and interests of
the parties before it. Order 1, rule 9 of the CPR.
James Tugee, 2023
D. THIRD PARTY PROCEEDINGS (O.1, R. 15 – 23)
A defendant may apply for leave to issue a third party notice where the
defendant claims as against any other person not already a party to
the suit (the third party):
that he is entitled to contribution or indemnity; or
that he is entitled to any relief or remedy relating to or connected with the original
subject-matter of the suit and substantially the same as some relief or remedy
claimed by the plaintiff; or
that any question or issue relating to or connected with the said subject-matter is
substantially the same question or issue arising between the plaintiff and the
defendant and should properly be determined not only as between the plaintiff
and the defendant but as between the plaintiff and defendant and the third party
or between any or either of them.
James Tugee, 2023
THIRD PARTY PROCEEDINGS(3)
A third party notice states the nature and grounds of the claim and stipulates
the period within which the third party should enter appearance upon being
served with the notice.
A third party may also apply for leave of the court to issue a third party notice
upon another person not already a party to the proceedings and who he
claims against in a similar manner as a defendant may claim against a third
party.
Leave to issue a third party notice for service on the Government shall not be
granted unless the court is satisfied that the Government is in possession of all
such information as it reasonably requires as to the circumstances in which it is
alleged that the liability of the Government has arisen and as to the
departments and officers of the Government concerned.
James Tugee, 2023
THIRD PARTY PROCEEDINGS(4)
A third party that wishes to dispute the plaintiff’s claim in the suit as against the
defendant or his own liability to the defendant must enter an appearance in the suit
within the period specified in the third party notice.
A third party that fails to enter appearance within the stipulated time is deemed to
admit the validity of the decree obtained against the defendant and his own liability
to contribute or indemnify to the extent claimed in the third party notice. The third
party may, however, apply to the court for leave to enter an appearance where he
has failed to enter an appearance within the stipulated time, and the court may grant
such leave for good cause and upon such terms as the court thinks fit.
Where the Government is served with a third party notice and there is a default of
appearance, the Government is not deemed to have admitted the validity of the
decree obtained against the defendant or its own liability unless the court so orders.
An application for such an order is made by chamber summons.
James Tugee, 2023
THIRD PARTY PROCEEDINGS(5)
Where a third party defaults in entering an appearance in the suit and the suit
is tried and determined in favour of the plaintiff, the court may either at or
after the trial enter such judgment the nature of the suit may require for the
defendant giving notice to the third party.
Where the third party enters appearance, the defendant may by chamber
summons apply to the court for directions. If the court is satisfied that there is a
proper question to be tried as to the liability of the third party, the court may
order the question of such liability as between the third party and the
defendant to be tried in such manner, at or after the trial of the suit, as the
court may direct.
The court may decide all questions of costs between a third party and the
other parties to the suit.
James Tugee, 2023
THIRD PARTY PROCEEDINGS(8)
Where any suit is pending in which the rights of all parties can be
properly decided then no such suit of interpleader shall be instituted.
An interpleader application is made by originating summons, unless it is
made in a pending suit. Where it is made in a pending suit, s. 58 of the
CPA provides that it shall be made by notice of motion while O. 34, r. 1
of the CPR provides that it shall be made by summons in the suit.
The applicant must satisfy the court by way of affidavit or otherwise that
he claims no interest in the subject-matter in dispute other than for
charges or costs; there is no collusion between him and any of the
claimants; and he is willing to pay or transfer the subject matter into
court or to dispose of it as the court may direct.
James Tugee, 2023
INTERPLEADER (3)
The court may make an order declaring a claimant and all persons claiming
under him forever barred against the applicant where the claimant, having
been served with a summons calling him to appear, fails to appear in
pursuance of the summons, or appears but neglects or refuses to comply with
any order made after his appearance. Such order will, however, not affect
the rights of the claimants as between themselves.
Where no facts are disputed and only a question of law is to be determined,
the court may decide the question without the trial of an issue.
The court may make all such orders as are just and reasonable. This includes
orders as to costs and orders for the sale or disposal of the subject-matter of
the dispute. Where an order for costs is in favour of the applicant, the court
may give him a charge over the subject-matter.
James Tugee, 2023
F. SUITS BY OR AGAINST MINORS AND PERSONS
OF UNSOUND MIND (ORDER 32, CPR)
A suit by a minor or a person of unsound mind is instituted in the name of
the minor or the person of unsound mind by the next friend of the minor
or of the person of unsound mind.
Where a suit is filed by an advocate, the person whose name is used as
a next friend of the minor or person of unsound mind must sign a written
authority to the advocate to use his name as such. The authority is filed
in court.
Where a suit is instituted by or on behalf of a minor or a person of
unsound mind without a next friend, the defendant may apply to have
the suit dismissed with costs to be paid by the advocate or other person
by whom it was presented.
James Tugee, 2023
MINORS AND PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (2)
Where the defendant is a minor or a person of unsound mind, the court shall appoint a
proper person to be guardian ad litem of such minor or person of unsound mind for
purposes of defending the suit.
An order for the appointment of guardian ad litem may be obtained upon application
in the name and on behalf of the minor or person of unsound mind, or by the plaintiff.
The application is supported by an affidavit verifying that the proposed guardian has
no interests in the matters in controversy in the suit that are adverse to the interests of
the minor and that he is a fit person to be so appointed.
No order shall be made on an application for appointment of a guardian ad litem of a
minor except upon notice to, and after hearing any objections from:
the minor and to any guardian of the minor appointed or declared by an authority
competent in that behalf; or
where there is no such guardian, to the father or mother of the minor; or
where there is no father or mother of the minor, to the person in whose care the minor is.
James Tugee, 2023
MINORS AND PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (3)
Any adult of sound mind may act as next friend or guardian ad litem of a
minor or of a person of unsound mind, provided that the interest of such
person is not adverse to that of the minor or the person of unsound mind.
A plaintiff cannot act as a guardian ad litem and a defendant cannot act as
a next friend.
Where a minor or person of unsound mind has a guardian appointed or
declared by competent authority, no person other than such guardian shall
act as the next friend or guardian ad litem, unless the court considers, for
reasons to be recorded, that it is for the welfare of the minor or person of
unsound mind that another person be permitted to act or appointed.
No person shall without their consent be appointed a guardian ad litem.
Where there is no other person fit and willing to act as guardian ad litem, the
court may appoint any of its officers to be such guardian.
James Tugee, 2023
MINORS AND PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (4)
A next friend or guardian ad litem ought to obtain leave of the court, which
should be expressly recorded in the proceedings, to enter into any suit
agreement or compromise on behalf of a minor or person of unsound mind.
Any such agreement or compromise entered into without leave of the court so
recorded is voidable against all parties other than the minor or person of
unsound mind.
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, a next friend must first procure a fit
person to be put in his place and give security for the costs already incurred
before retiring. The application for the appointment of a new next friend is
supported by an affidavit showing the fitness of the person proposed and that
he has no interest adverse to that of the minor or person of unsound mind.
James Tugee, 2023
MINORS AND PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (6)
Upon attaining age of majority, a person on whose behalf a suit had been
filed or application made while a minor, elects whether to proceed with the
suit or application.
Where he elects to proceed with the suit or application, he shall apply for an
order discharging the next friend and for leave to proceed in his own name.
The title of the suit or application is in that case corrected to read “A.B., late a
minor, by C.D., his next friend, but now having attained majority.”
Where he elects to abandon the suit or application he shall, if a sole plaintiff or
sole applicant, apply for an order to dismiss the suit or application on
repayment of the costs incurred by the defendant or opposite party, or which
may have been paid by his next friend.
Where a minor co-plaintiff on attaining majority desires to repudiate the suit,
he shall apply to have his name struck out as co- plaintiff. The court shall
dismiss him from the suit if it finds that he is not a necessary party.
James Tugee, 2023
G. REPRESENTATIVE SUITS (O.1, R.8 CPA)
Where numerous persons have the same interest in any proceedings, the
proceedings may be commenced, and unless the court otherwise orders,
continued, by or against any one or more of them as representing all or as
representing all except one or more of them.
The parties shall in such case give notice of the suit to all such persons either
by personal service or, where from the number of persons or any other cause
such service is not reasonably practicable, by public advertisement, as the
court in each case may direct.
Any person on whose behalf or for whose benefit a suit is instituted or
defended under subrule (1) may apply to the court to be made a party to
such suit.
Representative suits are appropriate where many people have the same
interest and the same grievance.
James Tugee, 2023
CIVIL LITIGATION
TOPIC 6:
COMMENCEMENT OF SUITS
AREAS TO COVER
A party may plead any matter which has arisen at any time, whether before
or since the filing of the plaint.
A party may not in any pleading make an allegation of fact or raise a new
ground of claim inconsistent with a previous pleading of his in the same suit.
This does not, however, prejudice the right of a party to amend or to apply for
leave to amend his previous pleading so as to plead the allegations or claims
in the alternative.
Where in a defamation suit the plaintiff alleges that the words or matters
complained of were used in a defamatory sense other than their ordinary
meaning, he shall give particulars of the facts and matters on which he relies
in support of such sense.
James Tugee, 2023
PLEADINGS GENERALLY (5)
A party may by his pleading raise any point of law (e.g. limitation of
actions, challenge to jurisdiction etc.).
Every pleading shall contain the necessary particulars of any claim,
defence or other matter pleaded including:
particulars of any misrepresentation, fraud, breach of trust, wilful default or undue
influence on which the party pleading relies; and
where a party pleading alleges any condition of the mind of any person, whether
any disorder or disability of mind or any malice, fraudulent intention or other
condition of mind except knowledge, particulars of the facts on which the party
relies.
At any stage of the proceedings the court may order to be struck out or
amended any pleading on the ground that:
it discloses no reasonable cause of action or defence in law; or
it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious; or
it may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action; or
it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court.
Every pleading shall be signed by an advocate, or recognised agent
(as defined by Order 9, rule 2), or by the party if he sues or defends in
person.
James Tugee, 2023
D. ROLE OF AFFIDAVITS (O.19, CPR)
The general rule in civil proceedings is that facts are proven by oral evidence.
The court may, however, order that evidence be presented by affidavit(s).
O.19, r.1 provides that any court may at any time for sufficient reason order
that any particular fact or facts may be proved by affidavit, or that the
affidavit of any witness may be read at the hearing, on such conditions as the
court thinks reasonable.
In some forms of proceedings, e.g. Constitutional Petitions and Judicial Review
applications, the practice is to predominantly accept affidavit evidence.
Upon any application, evidence may be given by affidavit, but the court may,
at the instance of either party, order the attendance for cross-examination of
the deponent.
James Tugee, 2023
ROLE OF AFFIDAVITS (2)
Affidavits shall be confined to such facts as the deponent is able of his own
knowledge to prove. In interlocutory proceedings, or by leave of the court, an
affidavit may contain statements of information and belief showing the sources
and grounds thereof.
Affidavits are drawn in the first person and divided into paragraphs numbered
consecutively.
The court may order to be struck out from any affidavit any matter which is
scandalous, irrelevant or oppressive.
The court may receive any affidavit sworn for the purpose of being used in any
suit notwithstanding any defect by misdescription of the parties or otherwise in
the title or other irregularity in the form thereof or on any technicality.
James Tugee, 2023
E. THE PLAINT (O.4, CPR)
Where the plaintiff seeks the recovery of money, the plaint shall state
the precise amount claimed, except where the plaintiff sues for mesne
profits, or for an amount which will be found due to him on taking
unsettled accounts between him and the defendant.
Where the subject-matter of the suit is immovable property, the plaint
shall contain a description of the property sufficient to identify it.
Where the plaintiff sues in a representative capacity the plaint shall
state the capacity in which he sues and where the defendant is sued in
a representative capacity the plaint shall state the capacity in which he
is sued. In both cases it shall be stated how that capacity arises.
James Tugee, 2023
THE PLAINT (4)
A suit is instituted by presenting the relevant pleading to the court. This may be
done physically at the court registry or online (where applicable) by using the
judiciary e-filing system.
The pleading used to make the claim (e.g., the plaint) indicates the heading
the choice of track: small claim, fast track, or multi-track.
“small claim” refers to a simple claim, involving not more than two parties and whose
monetary value does not exceed Kshs. 200,000/-;
“Fast track” refers to a case with undisputed facts and legal issues; relatively few parties;
and would likely be concluded within 180 days after the pretrial directions under O.11.
“Multi-track” refers to a case with complex facts and legal issues; or several parties and
which would likely be concluded within 240 days from the date of the pretrial directions
under O.11.
James Tugee, 2023
FRAME AND INSTITUTION OF SUITS (2)
In choosing a case track, the plaintiff shall have regard to all relevant
considerations including:
the complexity of the issues of fact, law or evidence;
the financial value of the claim;
the likely expense to the parties;
the importance of issues of law or fact to the public;
the nature of the remedy sought;
the number of parties or prospective parties; and
the time required for pre-trial disclosures and for preparation for trial or hearing;
A plaint to be filed is presented to the registry during office hours together with
any fee payable on its filing. The plaint is date-stamped with the date on
which it is presented, which is the date of filing the suit.
Every suit shall include the whole of the claim which the plaintiff is entitled to
make in respect of the cause of action; but a plaintiff may relinquish any
portion of his claim. Where a plaintiff omits to sue in respect of or relinquishes
any portion of his claim, he shall not afterwards sue in respect of the portion
omitted or relinquished.
A person entitled to more than one relief in respect of the same cause of
action may sue for all or any of such reliefs; but if he omits, except with the
leave of the court, to sue for all such reliefs he shall not afterwards sue for any
relief so omitted.
James Tugee, 2023
FRAME AND INSTITUTION OF SUITS (5)
A plaintiff may unite in the same suit several causes of action against the same
defendant or the same defendants jointly; and any plaintiffs having causes of
action in which they are jointly interested against the same defendant or the
same defendants jointly may unite such causes of action in the same suit.
Where causes of action are united, the jurisdiction of the court as regards the
suit shall depend on the amount or value of the aggregate of the subject-
matters at the date of instituting the suit.
Where it appears to the court that any causes of action joined in one suit
cannot be conveniently tried or disposed of together, the court may either on
the application of any party or of its own motion order separate trials or may
make such order as may be expedient.
James Tugee, 2023
G. ISSUE AND SERVICE OF SUMMONS (O.5)
Every summons is prepared by the plaintiff or his advocate and filed in court
together with the plaint.
The summons is signed by the judge or an officer appointed by the judge and
sealed with the seal of the court. This should be done without delay and, in
any event, not more than 30 days from the date of filing suit.
The time for appearance is fixed with reference to the place of residence of
the defendant to allow him sufficient time to appear but shall not be less than
10 days in any event.
The summons is then collected by the plaintiff within 30 days of it being issued
by the court, except where the court is to effect service of the summons.
Failure to collect the summons within this period results in the abatement of
the suit.
The summons is accompanied by a copy of the plaint.
James Tugee, 2023
ISSUE OF SUMMONS (2)
Where the court has issued summons to a defendant, the summons may be
delivered for service to:
any person for the time being duly authorized by the court;
an advocate, or advocate’s clerk approved by the court;
any subordinate court having jurisdiction in the place where the defendant resides;
a police officer; or
a licensed courier service provider approved by the court.
A court to which a summons is sent for service shall upon receipt thereof
proceed as if it had been issued by such court, and shall then return the
summons to the court of issue, together with the record of any of its
proceedings with regard thereto.
James Tugee, 2023
SERVICE OF SUMMONS (2)
Subject to any other written law, where the suit is against a corporation the
summons may be served on the secretary, director or other principal officer of
the corporation.
If the process server is unable to find any of the officers of the corporation
mentioned above, the summons may be served:
by leaving it at the registered office of the corporation;
by sending it by prepaid registered post or by a licensed courier service provider
approved by the court to the registered postal address of the corporation; or
if there is no registered office and no registered postal address of the corporation,
by leaving it at the place where the corporation carries on business; or
by sending it by registered post to the last known postal address of the
corporation.
James Tugee, 2023
SERVICE OF SUMMONS (4)
Where the serving officer, after using all due and reasonable diligence,
cannot find the defendant, or any person on whom service can be made,
the serving officer shall affix a copy of the summons on the outer door or
some other conspicuous part of the house in which the defendant ordinarily
resides or carries on business or personally works for gain, and shall then return
the original to the court from which it was issued, together with an affidavit of
service.
On any allegation that a summons has not been properly served, the court
may examine the serving officer on oath, or cause him to be so examined by
another court, touching his proceedings, and may make such further inquiry
in the matter as it thinks fit; and shall either declare that the summons has
been duly served or order such service as it thinks fit.
The serving officer in all cases in which summons has been served
under any of the foregoing rules shall swear and annex or cause to be
annexed to the original summons an affidavit of service stating the
time when and the manner in which summons was served and the
name and address of the person (if any) identifying the person served
and witnessing the delivery or tender of summons.
The affidavit of service shall be in Form No 4 of Appendix A of the CPR
with such variations as circumstances may require.
TOPIC 7:
RESPONSE TO THE SUIT
AREAS TO COVER
Where a defendant has been served with summons to appear, he shall file his
appearance within the time prescribed in the summons.
Appearance is effected by filing and serving a memorandum of appearance
in Form No. 12 of Appendix A of the CPR with such variation as the
circumstances require.
The memorandum of appearance is signed by the advocate by whom the
defendant appears or, if the defendant appears in person, by the defendant
or their recognised agent.
Where a defence contains the defendant’s address for service it shall, where
necessary, be treated as an appearance.
Once issued with summons, and before the expiry of the time within which to
respond, a defendant may by notice in writing to the plaintiff, request for
further information as specified in a Request for Particulars [Form No. 2
Appendix A of the CPR].
The plaintiff may in answer to a Request for Particulars provide the Particulars
[Form No. 3 Appendix A of the CPR]
Once a Request for Particulars has been issued, the time for appearance
expires:
4 days after the defendant’s notice in writing acknowledging that they are
satisfied; or
4 days after the court decides, upon application of the plaintiff by chamber
summons, that no further information is required.
Where the defendant decides to confess and avoid, this means that he
admits the allegations subject to some facts, which adversely affect the
claim.
The technique of confession and avoidance is used where the
defendant admits the existence of some allegations but avoids the
legal consequences of the existence of those facts from which the
allegations emanate.
A doctor sued as a defendant in a medical negligence claim may, for
instance, admit that he treated the patient and that the patient died
during treatment, but deny that the patient’s death was as a result of
negligence on his part. An employer may also admit dismissing an
employee from his employment but deny that such dismissal was
wrongful.
James Tugee, 2023
V. ADMISSION
A set-off in its general usage is the right of a creditor to deduct a debt it owes
to the debtor from a claim it has against the debtor.
A defendant in a suit may set-off any right or claim against the plaintiff’s
claims.
Where in any suit a set-off is established as a defence against the plaintiff’s
claim, the court may, if the balance is in favour of the defendant, give
judgment for the defendant for such balance, or may otherwise adjudge to
the defendant such relief as he may be entitled to upon the merits of the
case.
Where the defendant relies upon several distinct grounds of set-off founded
upon separate and distinct facts, they shall be stated, as far as practicable,
separately and distinctly.
James Tugee, 2023
C. CONSEQUENCES OF NON-APPEARANCE, DEFAULT
OF DEFENCE AND FAILURE TO SERVE (O.10)
Where no appearance has been entered for a defendant who is an infant or
person of unsound mind, the plaintiff shall before proceeding further apply to
the court for an order that some person be assigned guardian of such
defendant by whom he may appear and defend the suit.
Where any defendant fails to appear and the plaintiff wishes to proceed
against such defendant, he shall file an affidavit of service of the summons
unless the summons has been served by a process-server appointed by the
court.
Where a defendant fails to serve either the memorandum of appearance or
defence within the prescribed time, the court may on its own motion or on
application by the plaintiff, strike out the memorandum of appearance or the
defence.
James Tugee, 2023
I. DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Where the plaint is drawn with a claim for pecuniary damages only or for
detention of goods with or without a claim for pecuniary damages, and any
defendant fails to appear or to file a defence, the court shall, on request,
enter interlocutory judgment against such defendant, and the plaintiff shall set
down the suit for assessment by the court of the damages or the value of the
goods and damages.
Where the plaint is drawn as above, and there are several defendants of
whom one or more appear and file a defence any other fails to appear or to
file a defence, the court shall, on request, enter interlocutory judgment
against the defendant failing to appear, and the damages or the value of the
goods and the damages, shall be assessed at the same time as the hearing of
the suit against the other defendants, unless the court otherwise orders.
James Tugee, 2023
GENERAL RULES
In all suits not otherwise specifically provided for by O.10 of the CPR, where
any party served does not appear or fails to respond to the claim, the plaintiff
may set down the suit for hearing.
Where judgment has been entered under O.10, the court may set aside or
vary such judgment and any consequential decree or order upon such terms
as are just.
A default judgment may be set aside where:
it has been irregularly obtained (for instance, where the defendant was not served
with summons to enter appearance); or
the defendant provides a proper explanation for failure to enter appearance or
file defence within time and shows that there are triable issues.
James Tugee, 2023
D. REPLY TO DEFENCE AND DEFENCE TO
COUNTERCLAIM
Reply to defence: A plaintiff is entitled to file a reply within 14 days after the
defence or the last of the defences has been served on to him [O.7, r.17(1)].
No pleading subsequent to the reply shall be pleaded without leave of the
court, and then shall be pleaded only upon such terms as the court thinks fit
[O.7, r.17(2)].
Where a counterclaim is pleaded, a defence thereto shall be subject to the
rules applicable to defence [O.7, r.17(3)].
Defence/reply to counterclaim: Any person named in a defence as a party to
a counterclaim thereby made may, unless some other or further order is made
by the court, deliver a reply within 15 days after service upon him of the
counterclaim and shall serve a copy thereof on all parties to the suit [O.7, r. 11].
James Tugee, 2023
CIVIL LITIGATION
TOPIC 8:
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS
AREAS TO COVER
A. Role of applications.
B. Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders (O.40)
C. Arrest and attachment before judgment (O.39)
D. Judgment on admission (O.13)
E. Summary judgment (O.36)
The general test for grant of interlocutory injunctions is set out in Giella v
Cassman Brown & Company Ltd (1973) EA 358:
“First, an applicant must show a prima facie case with a probability of
success. Secondly, an interlocutory injunction will not normally be granted
unless the applicant might otherwise suffer irreparable injury, which would not
be adequately compensated by an award of damages. Thirdly, if the court is
in doubt, it will decide an application on the balance of convenience.”
These conditions or pillars of the test apply sequentially and consecutively. An
applicant has to satisfy the court that both of the first two limbs of the test
have been met in order to obtain an interlocutory injunction. Where the court
is in doubt, the third limb kicks in and the court makes the determination on a
balance of convenience.
James Tugee, 2023
INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS: GENERAL TEST
(2)
A prima facie case is a case in which, on the material presented to the court,
a tribunal properly directing itself will conclude that there exists a right which
has apparently been infringed by the opposite party as to call for an
explanation or rebuttal from the latter. Mrao Ltd v First American Bank of
Kenya Ltd & 2 others [2003] KLR 125.
In all applications for injunction, the court shall, after inter-partes hearing
deliver its ruling either at once or within 30 days of the conclusion of the
hearing with notice to the parties or their advocates.
Where the ruling is not delivered within 30 days, the judge shall record the
reason therefor and immediately fix a date for ruling.
Where a suit in respect of which an interlocutory injunction has been granted
is not determined within a period of 12 months from the date of the grant, the
injunction shall lapse unless for any sufficient reason the court orders otherwise
The court may issue a warrant to arrest the defendant and bring him before
the court to show cause why he should not furnish security for his appearance
where, at any stage of a suit, the court is satisfied by affidavit or otherwise
that:
the defendant with intent to delay the plaintiff, or to avoid any process of the
court, or to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed
against him—
i. has absconded or left the local limits of the jurisdiction of the court; or
ii. is about to abscond or leave the local limits of the jurisdiction of the court; or
iii. has disposed of or removed from the local limits of the jurisdiction of the court
his property or any part thereof; or
the defendant is about to leave Kenya under circumstances affording reasonable
probability that the plaintiff will or may thereby be obstructed or delayed in the
execution of any decree that may be passed against the defendant in the suit.
James Tugee, 2023
SECURITY FOR APPEARANCE(2)
This does not apply to suits of the nature referred to in section 12 (a) to
(d) of the CPA, being suits for:
the recovery of immovable property, with or without rent or profits;
the partition of immovable property;
the foreclosure, sale or redemption in the case of a mortgage of or charge
upon immovable property; or
the determination of any other right to or interest in immovable property.
The defendant shall not be arrested if he pays to the officer entrusted
with the execution of the warrant any sum specified in the warrant as
sufficient to satisfy the plaintiff’s claim; and such sum shall be held in
deposit by the court until the suit is disposed of or until the further order
of the court.
James Tugee, 2023
SECURITY FOR APPEARANCE (3)
Where the defendant fails to show such cause the court shall order him either
to deposit in court money or other property sufficient to answer the claim
against him, or to furnish security for his appearance at any time when called
upon while the suit is pending and until satisfaction of the decree that may be
passed against him in the suit, or make such order as it thinks fit in regard to
the sum which may have been paid by the defendant to the officer entrusted
with the execution of the warrant.
Every surety for the appearance of a defendant shall bind himself, in default of
such appearance, to pay any sum of money which the defendant may be
ordered to pay in the suit.
A surety for the appearance of a defendant may at any time apply to the
court in which he became a surety to be discharged from his obligation.
On such application being made the court shall summon the defendant to
appear, or, if it thinks fit, may issue a warrant for his arrest in the first instance.
James Tugee, 2023
SECURITY FOR APPEARANCE (4)
Where at any stage of a suit the court is satisfied, by affidavit or otherwise, that
the defendant, with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree
that may be passed against him –
is about to dispose of the whole or any part of his property; or
is about to remove the whole or any part of his property from the local limits of the
jurisdiction of the court,
the court may direct the defendant, within a time to be fixed by it, either:
to furnish security, in such sum as may be specified in the order, to produce and
place at the disposal of the court, when required, the said property or the value of
the same, or such portion thereof as may be sufficient to satisfy the decree; or
to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security.
James Tugee, 2023
II. SECURITY FOR PRODUCTION OF PROPERTY (2)
The plaintiff shall, unless the court otherwise directs, specify the property
required to be attached and the estimated value thereof.
The court may in the order also direct the conditional attachment of the whole
or any portion of the property so specified.
Where the defendant fails to show cause why he should not furnish security, or
fails to furnish the security required, within the time fixed by the court, the court
may order that the property specified, or such portion thereof as appears
sufficient to satisfy any decree which may be passed in the suit, be attached.
Where the defendant shows cause or furnishes the required security, and the
property specified or any portion of it has been attached, the court shall order
the attachment to be withdrawn, or make such other order as it thinks fit.
James Tugee, 2023
III. OTHER PROVISIONS ON ATTACHMENT BEFORE
JUDGMENT
The attachment is made in the manner provided for the attachment of
property in execution of a decree, unless otherwise expressly provided.
Where any claim is preferred to property attached before judgment,
such claim shall be investigated.
Where an order is made for attachment before judgment, the court
shall order the attachment to be withdrawn when the defendant
furnishes the security required, together with security for the costs of the
attachment, or when the suit is dismissed.
Attachment before judgment shall not affect the rights, existing prior to
the attachment, of persons not parties to the suit, nor bar any person
holding a decree against the defendant from applying for the sale of
the property under attachment in execution of such decree.
Where property is under attachment by virtue of this Order, and a
decree is subsequently passed in favour of the plaintiff, it shall not be
necessary, upon an application for execution of such decree, to apply
for a re-attachment of the property.
An application for summary judgment may be made in suits where the plaintiff
seeks judgment for a liquidated demand or recovery of land as specified in
O.36, r.1(1) of the CPR, where the defendant has appeared but not filed a
defence.
The application is supported by an affidavit either of the plaintiff or some other
person who can swear positively to the facts verifying the cause of action and
any amount claimed. See Form No. 24 of Appendix A of the CPR.
Sufficient notice of the application shall be given to the defendant which
notice shall in no case be less than 7 days.
The defendant may show by affidavit, or by oral evidence, or otherwise that
he should have leave to defend the suit.
If the defendant is granted leave to defend the suit, he shall file his defence
within 14 days of the grant of leave unless the court otherwise orders.
James Tugee, 2023
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (3)
In The Challenger Trade Finance Segregated Portfolio of the South Africa SPC v Danish
Brewing Company E.A. Limited & 2 others [2021] eKLR (Ruling No. 2), Majanja J held:
“Order 36 rule 1 provides that an application for summary judgment should be made
before a defence is filed. I do not think that the application is incompetent merely
because it was filed after the Defendants has (sic) filed their respective statements of
defence because the defence is one of the ways the Defendants are entitled to
demonstrate that they have a good defence and that the matter should proceed to trial.
To insist that the application is incompetent on this ground is to elevate a technicality to a
fetish contrary to Article 159 of the Constitution which requires the court to determine
matter without undue regard to technicalities. In reaching this position, I am fortified by
several decisions of the Court of Appeal where it has held that in determining whether or
not to enter summary judgment, the court should look at the defence to determine
whether it raises a triable issue (see for example Ternic Enterprises Limited v Waterfront
Outlets Limited NRB CA Civil Appeal No. 136 of 2017 [2018] eKLR).” [Emphasis added]
James Tugee, 2023
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (6)
If it appears to the court that any defendant has a good defence to, or ought
to be permitted to defend the suit, and that any other defendant has not a
good defence and ought not to be permitted to defend the suit, the former
may be permitted to defend the suit, and the plaintiff shall be entitled to
judgment against the latter and may obtain execution of the decree thereon,
without prejudice to his right to proceed with his suit against the former.
Leave to defend may be given unconditionally, or subject to such terms as to
giving security or time of trial or otherwise, as the court thinks fit. The Order for
Leave to Defend is in Form No. 25 of Appendix A of the CPR.
Any judgment, given against any party who did not attend at the hearing of
the application for summary judgment, may, on application be set aside or
varied on such terms as are just.
James Tugee, 2023
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (7)
TOPIC 9:
CASE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES AND CONFERENCES
AREAS TO COVER
Within 14 days after the close of pleadings, the plaintiff shall file with
the court a case management checklist in the form set out in
Appendix B.
The plaintiff shall complete the checklist with:
the name of the advocate or firm of advocates representing each party;
the postal address, telephone number, email address and physical address
of the advocate or firm of advocates representing each party;
where a party is not represented by an advocate or a firm of advocates,
the postal address, telephone number, email address and physical address
of the party; and
a list of all the pleadings which have been filed with the date on which
each pleading was filed.
James Tugee, 2023
CASE MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST (2)
Where any pleadings have been amended, the checklist shall also contain:
the list of the original and amended pleadings with the date on which the
original and amended pleadings were filed; and
the details of all bundles of documents, lists of witnesses and statements of
witnesses where they have been filed with the court.
Within 14 days of filing the checklist, the plaintiff shall serve it on the other
party/parties to the suit and invite them, in writing, to meet at the registry to fix
a date for case management conference which shall:
take place within 60 days of service of the checklist in a fast-track case; or
take place within 90 days of service of the checklist in a multi-track case.
James Tugee, 2023
C. CASE MANAGEMENT REQUEST
The parties shall, not less than 7 days before the date of
the case management conference, serve on the other
party/parties:
a case management request in the form set out in
Appendix B setting out any orders the parties may seek at
the case management conference and to which all
necessary documents including draft amended pleadings,
request for particulars and request for interrogatories shall
be attached; or
a request to refer the case to alternative dispute resolution
or any other amicable settlement process.
James Tugee, 2023
D. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
At the end of a case management conference, the court shall sign a case
management conference certificate in the form set out in Appendix C and
make a case management order in the form set out in Appendix D.
Where the parties settle the case or issues in the case, the judicial officer shall
issue a case settlement order in relation to the case or the issues in the case.
Where parties accept an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) request:
where the ADR mechanism to be used was specified, the court may make an
order to stay proceedings for a specified period during which the parties will
attempt to settle the case through that alternative mechanism; or
where the form of ADR was not specified, the court may make an order to stay
proceedings for a specified period, and specify the ADR mechanism the parties
shall use in an attempt to settle the case.
James Tugee, 2023
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (2)
Where the parties settle the case or issues in the case through ADR, the
judge, magistrate, deputy registrar, or case management officer shall
adopt the resolution by the parties as an order of the court.
The judge, magistrate, deputy registrar, or case management officer
shall, where the parties have failed to settle the case or to undergo
ADR, direct that the case may be set down for hearing and may, in the
circumstances, determine the date on which the case shall be set
down for hearing.
Pursuant to O.11, r. 1 of the CPR, the Order does not apply to suits for
small claims (refer to case tracks at O.3, r.2 of the CPR) or such other
suits as the court may order to vary the whole or any part of the
provisions of O.11.
Order 11 and therefore the case management processes apply to all
other suits governed by the Civil Procedure Rules.
The court may frame the issues from all or any of the following materials:
Allegations made on oath by the parties, or by any persons present
on their behalf, or made by the advocates of such parties;
Allegations made in the pleading or in answers to interrogatories
delivered in the suit.
The contents of documents produced by either party.
TOPIC 10:
HEARING OF SUITS
AREAS TO COVER
A. Attendance at court.
B. Order of proceedings.
C. Examination of witnesses.
D. Submissions.
E. Withdrawal and discontinuance of suits.
F. Compromise of suits.
In any suit in which no application has been made or step taken by either
party for one year, the court may give notice in writing to the parties to show
cause why the suit should not be dismissed.
If cause is not shown to its satisfaction, the court may dismiss the suit.
If cause is shown to the satisfaction of the court, it may make such orders as it thinks
fit to obtain expeditious hearing of the suit.
Any party to the suit may apply for its dismissal if no application has been
made or step taken for one year.
A suit stands dismissed after two years where no step has been undertaken.
A party may apply for reinstatement of the suit that has been dismissed under
O.17.
James Tugee, 2023
PROSECUTION OF SUITS (2)
Where, on any day on which the suit is fixed for hearing or to which the
hearing of the suit is adjourned, the parties or any of them fail to
appear, the court may proceed to dispose of the suit in one of the
modes directed in that behalf by Order 12, or make such other order as
it thinks fit.
Where any party to a suit to whom time has been granted fails to
produce his evidence, or to cause the attendance of his witnesses, or
to perform any other act necessary to the further progress of the suit, for
which time has been allowed, the court may, notwithstanding such
default, proceed to decide the suit forthwith.
The plaintiff shall have the right to begin unless the court otherwise orders
On the day fixed for the hearing of the suit, or on any other day to which the
hearing is adjourned:
The party having the right to begin shall state his case and produce his evidence in
support of the issues which he is bound to prove.
The other party shall then state his case and produce his evidence, and may then
address the court generally on the case. The party beginning may then reply.
After the party beginning has produced his evidence then, if the other party does
not propose to produce evidence, the party beginning shall have the right to
address the court generally on the case, and the other party shall then have the
right to address the court in reply.
The court may in its discretion limit the time allowed for addresses by the parties or
their advocates.
James Tugee, 2023
C. EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES
Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the court, and the court after
hearing the parties directs, that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in
part by any lawful agreement or compromise, or where the defendant
satisfies the plaintiff in respect of the whole or any part of the subject-
matter of the suit, the court shall, on the application of any party, order
that such agreement, compromise or satisfaction be recorded and
enter judgment in accordance therewith.
The court, on the application of any party, may make any further order
necessary for the implementation and execution of the terms of the
decree.
James Tugee, 2023
CIVIL LITIGATION
TOPIC 11:
RULINGS, ORDERS, JUDGMENTS AND DECREES
AREAS TO COVER
A ruling is the final decision of the court with respect to an interlocutory matter
or application which arises from and within the proceedings of the substantive
suit.
A ruling will usually contain/indicate:
The matter/application upon which the court’s decision has been sought or is
made;
Relevant facts;
Issue(s)/point(s) for determination;
The decision on the issue(s)/point(s) for determination; and
The reasons for the determination.
James Tugee, 2023
B. JUDGMENTS
A judgment is the final decision of the court which disposes of substantive issues in the
suit.
In suits where a hearing is necessary, the court after the case has been heard, shall
pronounce judgment either at once or within 60 days from the conclusion of the trial,
notice of which shall be given to the parties or their advocates. Where judgment is not
given within 60 days, the judge shall record reasons thereof copy of which shall be
forwarded to the Chief Justice and shall immediately fix a date for judgment.
While O.21,r.1 of the CPR provides that the court shall pronounce judgment in open
court, judgments may also be delivered in a virtual court session and at times by email
to the parties. See, e.g., the Practice Directions to Standardize Practice and
Procedures in the High Court, 2022, which expressly provide for delivery of rulings and
judgments in a virtual court session.
James Tugee, 2023
I. PRONOUNCEMENT AND SIGNING OF
JUDGMENTS
A judge may pronounce a judgment written and signed but not pronounced
by his predecessor.
A judge of the High Court may pronounce a judgment written and signed but
not pronounced by another judge of the High Court.
A judgment pronounced by the judge who wrote it shall be dated and signed
by him in court at the time of pronouncing it.
A judgment pronounced by a judge other than the judge by whom it was
written shall be dated and countersigned by him in open court at the time of
pronouncing it.
A judgment once signed shall not afterwards be altered or added to save as
provided by section 99 of the CPA or on review.
James Tugee, 2023
II. CONTENTS OF A JUDGMENT
On any disagreement with the draft decree any party may file the draft decree
marked as “for settlement”. In that case, the draft decree shall be listed for settlement
of terms before the judge or magistrate who heard the case or, if he is not available,
before any other judge or magistrate.
A decree shall bear the date on which the judgment was delivered. The date of the
judgment is the date on which the decree is “made” or “given”.
The decree will also indicate the date on which it is issued by the court. This is the
actual date on which it is signed and sealed by the deputy registrar or magistrate.
Any order which is required to be drawn up, is prepared and signed in like manner as
a decree.
A court retains the power to approve a draft decree at the time of pronouncing
judgment in the suit and to approve a draft order at the time of making the order.
James Tugee, 2023
II. COSTS IN THE DECREE
The amount of costs may be stated in the decree or order where it has been:
agreed between the parties;
fixed by the judge or magistrate before the decree is drawn;
certified by the registrar; or
taxed by the court.
In all other cases, and where the costs have not in fact been stated in the
decree or order, after the amount of the costs has been taxed or otherwise
ascertained, it shall be stated in a Certificate of Costs to be signed by the
taxing officer or by the magistrate.
See Order 21, rules 9A to 9D for the procedure for award/assessment of costs
in the Magistrates’ Courts.
James Tugee, 2023
III. SPECIAL PROVISIONS/REQUIREMENTS FOR SOME
DECREES
Where the subject-matter of the suit is immovable property, the decree shall
contain a description of such property sufficient to identify the same, and,
where such property can be identified by boundaries or by numbers in a
government record or survey, the decree shall specify such boundaries or
numbers.
Where the suit is in respect of movable property, and the decree is for the
delivery of such property, the decree shall also state the amount of money to
be paid as an alternative if delivery cannot be had.
Where the defendant has been allowed a set-off against the claim of the
plaintiff, the decree shall state what amount is due to the plaintiff and what
amount is due to the defendant, and shall be for the recovery of any sum
which appears to be due to either party.
James Tugee, 2023
SPECIAL PROVISIONS/REQUIREMENTS FOR SOME
DECREES (2)
Where a suit is for the recovery of possession of immovable property and for
rent or mesne profits, the court may pass a decree:
for the possession of the property;
for the rent or mesne profits which have accrued on the property during a period
prior to the institution of the suit or directing an inquiry as to such rent or mesne
profits; or
directing an inquiry as to rent or mesne profits from the institution of such suit until –
i. the delivery of possession to the decree-holder;
ii. the relinquishment of possession by the judgment- debtor with notice to the
decree-holder through the court; or
iii. The expiration of 3 years from the date of the decree, whichever event first
James Tugee, 2023 occurs.
CIVIL LITIGATION
TOPIC 12:
REMEDIES UPON JUDGMENT
AREAS TO COVER
A. Payment by instalments.
B. Stay of execution.
C. Objection proceedings.
Under O.42, r.6(2) of the CPR provides that no order for stay of execution shall
be made under O.42, r.6(1) unless—
the court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order
is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay;
and
such security as the court orders for the due performance of such decree or order
as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant.
Nonetheless, the court has power, without formal application being made, to
order upon such terms as it may deem fit a stay of execution pending the
hearing of a formal application.
An application for stay of execution may be made informally immediately
following the delivery of judgment or ruling.
James Tugee, 2023
STAY OF EXECUTION UNDER O.42,R.6
In Rhoda Mukuma v John Abuoga [1988] eKLR, the Court of Appeal described
substantial loss as the “cornerstone” in an application for stay of execution
whether made in the High Court or the Court of Appeal.
James Tugee, 2023
III. STAY OF EXECUTION UNDER RULE 5(2)(B) OF
THE COURT OF APPEAL RULES
Rule 5(2) (b) of the Court of Appeal Rules provides that the institution of an
appeal shall not operate to stay execution, but the Court of Appeal may in
any civil proceedings where a notice of appeal has been lodged in
accordance with rule 77, order a stay of execution on such terms as the court
may think just.
The Court of Appeal, in Trust Bank Limited and Another v. Investech Bank
Limited & 3 Others [2000] eKLR:
“The jurisdiction of the Court under Rule 5(2)(b) is original and discretionary and… to
succeed an applicant has to show firstly that his appeal or intended appeal is
arguable, to put another way, it is not frivolous and secondly that unless he is granted
a stay the appeal or intended appeal, if successful will be rendered nugatory…”
TOPIC 13:
EXECUTION OF DECREES
AREAS TO COVER
A. Parties to execution
B. Which court executes the decree? (s. 30 – 31, CPA; O.22, r. 4 CPR)
C. Modes of execution (s. 38, CPA)
D. Application for execution (O.22, r. 6 – 12)
E. Notice to show cause against execution (O.22, r.18)
F. Process of execution (O.22, r.20 – 21)
A decree may be executed either by the court which passed it or by the court to
which it is sent for execution.
The court which passed the decree may, on the application of the decree holder,
send it for execution to another court if:
the person against whom the decree is passed resides, carries on business, or works for gain,
within the local limits of the jurisdiction of that other court; or
such person has no property within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the court which
passed the decree sufficient to satisfy such decree and has property within the local limits of
the jurisdiction of such other court; or
the decree directs the sale or delivery of immovable property situate outside the local limits
of the jurisdiction of the court which has passed it; or
the court which has passed the decree considers for any other reason, which it has
recorded in writing, that the decree should be executed by such other court.
James Tugee, 2023
COURTS BY WHICH DECREES MAY BE EXECUTED (2)
The court which passed a decree may of its own motion send it for execution
to any court of inferior but competent jurisdiction.
The court to which a decree is sent for execution shall certify to the court
which passed it the fact of such execution, or where the former court fails to
execute the same the circumstances attending such failure.
The court executing a decree sent to it shall have the same powers in
executing such decree as if it had been passed by itself.
All persons disobeying or obstructing the execution of the decree shall be
punishable by such court in the same manner as if it had passed the decree;
and its order in executing such decree shall be subject to the same rules in
respect of appeal as if the decree had been passed by itself.
James Tugee, 2023
C. MODES OF EXECUTION (S. 38, CPA)
Where a decree is for the payment of money the court may on the oral
application of the decree-holder at the time of the passing of the decree,
order immediate execution thereof by the arrest of the judgment-debtor, prior
to the preparation of a warrant, if he is within the precincts of the court.
Unless an oral application is expressly allowed by law, every application for the
execution of a decree shall be in writing, signed by the applicant or his
advocate or by some other person proved to the satisfaction of the court to
be acquainted with the facts of the case, and shall contain in a tabular form
the particulars provided for under O.22, r. 7(2) of the CPR.
The court to which an application for execution of a decree is made may
require the applicant to produce a certified copy of the decree.
James Tugee, 2023
APPLICATION FOR EXECUTION (3)
the amount with interest, if any, due upon the decree, or other relief granted
thereby, together with particulars of any cross- decree, whether passed before or
after the date of the decree sought to be executed;
the amount of the costs, if any, awarded;
the name of the person against whom execution of the decree is sought; and
the mode in which the assistance of the court is required, whether:
i. by the delivery of any property specifically decreed;
ii. by the attachment and sale, or by the sale without attachment, of any property;
iii. by the arrest and detention in prison of any person;
iv. by the appointment of a receiver;
v. otherwise, as the nature of the relief granted may require.
James Tugee, 2023
APPLICATION FOR EXECUTION (5)
Where an application for execution is made more than one year after the
date of the decree; against the legal representative of a party to the decree;
or for attachment of salary or allowance of any person , the court executing
the decree shall issue a notice to the person against whom execution is
applied for requiring him to show cause, on a date to be fixed, why the
decree should not be executed against him.
A notice to show cause is not necessary:
in consequence of more than one year having elapsed between the date of the
decree and the application for execution if the application is made within one
year from the date of the last order against the party against whom the execution
is applied for, made on any previous application for execution;
Where the person to whom a notice to show cause is issued does not appear
or does not show cause to the satisfaction of the court why the decree should
not be executed, the court shall order the decree to be executed.
Where such person offers any objection to the execution of the decree, the
Court shall consider such objection and make such order as it thinks fit.
When the preliminary measures (if any) required have been taken, the court
shall, unless there is cause to the contrary, issue its process for the execution of
the decree.
Every such process shall bear the date and the day on which it is issued, and
shall be signed by the judge or such officer as the court may appoint in this
behalf, and shall be sealed with the seal of the court and delivered to the
proper officer to be executed.
The officer entrusted with the execution of the process shall endorse thereon
the day on, and the manner in which it was executed, and, if the latest day
specified in the process for the return thereof has been exceeded, the reason
for the delay, or, if it was not executed, the reason why it was not executed,
and shall return the process with such endorsement to the court.
James Tugee, 2023
PROCESS OF EXECUTION (2)
Where the endorsement is to the effect that such officer is unable to execute
the process, the court may examine him touching his alleged inability, and
may, if it thinks fit, summon and examine witnesses as to such inability, and
shall record the result.
TOPIC 14:
AMENDMENT AND REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS, DECREES AND
ORDERS
AREAS TO COVER
The slip rule is a process by which the court may correct an accidental slip or
omission in a judgment, decree or order.
Pursuant to section 99 of the CPA, clerical or arithmetical mistakes in
judgments, decrees or orders, or errors arising therein from any accidental slip
or omission, may at any time be corrected by the court either of its own
motion or on the application of any of the parties.
A party may apply for correction of such mistakes and errors by writing a letter
to the court pointing out the mistakes or errors and requesting that they be
corrected.
Section 80 of the CPA and O.45, r.1 of the CPR provide for the court’s power to
review its orders and decrees.
Pursuant to section 80 of the CPA, any person who considers himself
aggrieved—.
by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed by the Act, but from
which no appeal has been preferred; or
by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed by the Act,
may apply for a review of judgment to the court which passed the decree or
made the order, and the court may make such order thereon as it thinks fit.
Pursuant to section 80 of the CPA and O.45, r.1 of the CPR, the grounds for
review of a judgment are:
Discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of
due diligence, was not within the applicant’s knowledge or could not be
produced by him at the time when the decree was passed or the order made.
A mistake or error apparent on the face of the record.
any other sufficient reason.
“In Nyamogo & Nyamogo v Kogo (2001) EA 174 this Court said that an error apparent on
the face of the record cannot be defined precisely or exhaustively, there being an
element of indefiniteness inherent in its very nature, and it must be left to be determined
judicially on the facts of each case. There is real distinction between a mere erroneous
decision and an error apparent on the face of record. Where an error on a substantial
point of law stares one in the face, and there could reasonably be no two opinions, a
clear case of error apparent on the face of the record would be made out. An error
which has to be established by long drawn process of reasoning or on points where there
may conceivably be two opinions, can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the
face of the record.”
James Tugee, 2023
II. MISTAKE OR ERROR APPARENT ON THE FACE OF
THE RECORD (2)
In Muyodi (supra), the court further cited with approval the holding in
Chandrakhant Joshibhai Patel v R [2004] TLR, 218 to the effect that an error
stated to be apparent on the face of the record "must be such as can be
seen by one who runs and reads, that is, an obvious and patent mistake and
not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reading
on points on which may be conceivably be two opinions.”
A review may be granted whenever the court considers that it is necessary to
correct an apparent error or omission on the part of the court. The error or
omission must be self-evident and should not require an elaborate argument
to be established. See, e.g., Zablon Mokua v Solomon M. Choti & 3 others
[2016] eKLR.
James Tugee, 2023
II. MISTAKE OR ERROR APPARENT ON THE FACE OF
THE RECORD (3)
Where an application for review is based on the ground that there is sufficient
reason for such review, the court is called upon to exercise its discretion. See
Republic v Cabinet Secretary for Interior and Co-Ordination of National
Government ex parte Abullahi Said Said [2019] eKLR.
Courts are divided on whether such other sufficient reason for review needs to
be analogous to the two grounds for review that are specifically stated at
O.45,r.1 of the CPR. The predominant position, however, seems to be that it
need not be analogous to the two other grounds.
“As repeatedly pointed out in various decisions of this Court, the words, “for any
sufficient reason” must be viewed in the context firstly of Section 80 of the Civil
Procedure Act, Cap 21, which confers an unfettered right to apply for review
and secondly on the current jurisprudential thinking that the words need not be
analogous with the other grounds specified in the order. In Sarder Mohamed v.
Charan Singh Nand Sing and Another (1959) EA 793, the High Court correctly
held that Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act conferred an unfettered
discretion in the Court to make such order as it thinks fit on review and that the
omission of any qualifying words in the Section was deliberate.”
James Tugee, 2023
III. ANY OTHER SUFFICIENT REASON (3)
“I see no reason why any other sufficient reason need be analogous with the
other grounds in the order because clearly section 80 of the Civil Procedure
Act confers an unfettered right to apply for a review and so the words ‘for
any other sufficient reason’ need not be analogous with the other grounds
specified in the order.”
TOPIC 15:
APPEALS
AREAS TO COVER
A. Introduction
B. Powers of an appellate court
C. Appeals to the High Court and Courts of equal status.
D. Appeals to the Court of Appeal.
E. Appeals to the Supreme Court.
Every appeal from a subordinate court to the High Court shall be filed within
30 days from the date of the decree or order appealed against, excluding
from such period any time which the lower court may certify as having been
requisite for the preparation and delivery to the appellant of a copy of the
decree or order (s. 79G, CPA).
An appeal may be admitted out of time if the appellant satisfies the court
that he had good and sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.
A register of appeals, to be called the register of appeals, shall be kept at
every registry at which appeals are filed, and the particulars of every appeal
shall be entered in such register and all appeals shall be numbered in each
year according to the order in which the appeals are filed.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(3)
Where no certified copy of the decree or order appealed against is filed with
the memorandum of appeal, the appellant shall file such certified copy as
soon as possible and in any event within such time as the court may order,
and the court need not consider whether to reject the appeal summarily
under section 79B of the CPA until such certified copy is filed.
A judge of the High Court shall within 30 days of the filing of an appeal,
peruse it and give directions in accordance with section 79B of the CPA.
Where the judge admits the appeal under section 79B of the Act, the
registrar shall notify the appellant who shall serve the memorandum of
appeal on every respondent within 7 days of receipt of the notice from the
registrar.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(5)
Upon notice to the parties delivered not less than 21 days after the date of
service of the memorandum of appeal, the registrar shall cause the appeal
to be listed for the giving of directions by a judge in chambers [O.42, r.13(1)]
The appellant may amend his memorandum of appeal without leave at any
time before the court gives directions under O.42, r.13 of the CPR. Thereafter,
the court may, on application, permit the appellant to amend his
memorandum of appeal.
Any objection to the jurisdiction of the appellate court shall be raised before
the judge before he gives directions under O.42, r.13 of the CPR.
The judge in chambers may give directions concerning the appeal generally
and, in particular, directions as to the manner in which the evidence and
exhibits presented to the court below shall be put before the appellate court
and as to the typing of any record or part thereof and any exhibits or other
necessary documents and the payment of the costs of such typing whether
in advance or otherwise.
Before allowing the appeal to go for hearing the judge shall be satisfied that
the following documents are on the court record, and that such of them as
are not in the possession of either party have been served on that party:
the memorandum of appeal;
the pleadings;
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(7)
At any time after the memorandum of appeal has been served the court, in
its discretion, may order the appellant to give security for the whole or any
part of the costs of such appeal.
If the appellant is not ordinarily resident in Kenya and has no sufficient
property in Kenya (other than property to which the appeal relates) the court
shall order the giving of security for the whole or part of the costs of the
appeal within a time to be limited in the order. If security for costs is not given
within the time ordered the court may dismiss the appeal.
When a memorandum of appeal is lodged the court to which such appeal is
preferred shall send notice of the appeal to the court from whose decree the
appeal is preferred.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(9)
The court receiving such notice shall send with all practicable despatch all
material papers in the suit, or such papers as may be specially called for by
the court to which such appeal is preferred.
Any party to an appeal who does not intend to appear in person or by
advocate at the hearing of the appeal may file a declaration in writing to
that effect and lodge written submissions of the arguments in support of or in
opposition to the appeal, as the case may be, and shall, within 7 days after
lodging the submission serve a copy thereof on the other party or on each
other party appearing in person or separately represented (O.42, r.16).
A party who has lodged written submissions in this manner may, with leave of
the court, address the court at the hearing of the appeal.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(10)
Notice of the day fixed for hearing of the appeal shall be served on the
respondent or on his advocate in the manner provided for under Order 5. The
notice shall declare that, if the respondent does not appear in the court to which
such appeal is preferred on the day so fixed, the appeal may be heard ex parte.
The appellant shall not, except with leave of the court, urge or be heard in
support of any ground of objection not set forth in the memorandum of appeal;
but the High Court in deciding the appeal shall not be confined to the grounds
of objection set forth in the memorandum of appeal or taken by leave of the
court. The High Court shall, however, not rest its decision on any other ground
unless the party who may be affected thereby has had a sufficient opportunity
of contesting the case on that ground.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(11)
On the day fixed, or on any other day to which the hearing may be
adjourned, the appellant shall be heard in support of the appeal.
The court shall then, if it does not dismiss the appeal at once, hear the
respondent against the appeal, and in such case the appellant shall be
entitled to reply.
Where on the day fixed, or on any other day to which the hearing may be
adjourned, the appellant does not appear when the appeal is called on for
hearing, and has not filed a declaration under rule 16, the court may make
an order that the appeal be dismissed [O.42, r.20(1)].
Where the appellant appears, and the respondent does not appear and has
not filed a declaration under rule 16, the appeal may be heard ex parte.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(12)
Where an appeal is dismissed under O.42, r.20 of the CPR, the appellant may
apply to the court to which such appeal is preferred for the re-admission of
the appeal; and, where it is proved that he was prevented by any sufficient
cause from appearing when the appeal was called on for hearing, the court
shall re-admit the appeal on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.
Where an appeal is heard ex parte and judgment is pronounced against the
respondent, he may apply to the court to which the appeal is preferred to re-
hear the appeal; and if he satisfies the court that the notice was not duly
served or that he was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing when
the appeal was called on for hearing, the court shall re-hear the appeal on
such terms as to costs or otherwise as it deems fit.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(13)
Where it appears to the court at the hearing that any person who was a
party to the suit in the court from whose decree the appeal is preferred, but
who has not been made a party to the appeal, is interested in the result of
the appeal, the court may adjourn the hearing to a future day to be fixed by
the court and direct that such person be made a respondent.
Where the court from whose decree an appeal is preferred has disposed of
the suit upon a preliminary point, and the decree is reversed on appeal, the
court to which the appeal is preferred may, if it deems fit, by order remand
the case, and may further direct what issue or issues shall be tried in the case
so remanded.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE HIGH COURT(14)
Where the evidence upon the record is sufficient to enable the court to
which the appeal is preferred to pronounce judgment, the court to which the
appeal is preferred may, after resettling the issues, if necessary, finally
determine the suit, notwithstanding that the judgment of the court from
whose decree the appeal is preferred has proceeded wholly upon some
ground other than that on which the court to which the appeal is preferred
proceeds.
If upon the hearing of an appeal it shall appear to the court to which the
appeal is preferred that a new trial ought to be had, it shall be lawful for the
said court, if it shall think fit, to order that the judgment and decree shall be
set aside, and that a new trial shall be had.
James Tugee, 2023
D. APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
regulating the right of practising before the Court and the representation of
persons concerned in any proceedings in the Court;
providing for summary determination of any appeal which appears to the Court to
be frivolous or vexatious or to be brought for the purposes of delay;
prescribing forms and fees in respect of proceedings in the Court and regulating
the costs of and incidental to any such proceedings;
prescribing and regulating the powers and duties of officers of the Court;
prescribing the time within which any requirement of the rules is to be complied
with;
providing for a reference from a decision of a single judge to the Court.
Rules made under this section may fix the number of judges of the Court who
may sit for any purpose, provided that:
an uneven number of judges shall sit, which, for the purposes of any final
determination by the Court other than the summary dismissal of an appeal, shall
not be less than three; and
any determination by the Court on any matter (whether final or otherwise) shall,
where more than one judge sits, be according to the opinion of a majority of the
judges who sit for the purpose of determining that matter.
Rules made under section 5 of the AJA may amend or revoke the Court of
Appeal Rules, and the Court of Appeal Rules shall continue in force, subject to
any amendments so made, until so revoked, as if they were rules made under
section 5 of the AJA.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL (4)
Part IV (rules 76 to 108) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 (CAR) provides for
civil appeals. This part of the CAR applies to appeals to the Court of Appeal
from superior courts in exercise of the courts’ original and appellate jurisdiction
in civil cases and related matters.
A person who desires to appeal to the CoA shall give notice in writing, which
notice shall be lodged with the registrar of the superior court. The notice shall,
subject to rules 86 and 100, be lodged within 14 days after the date of the
decision against which it is desired to appeal.
A person who desires to appeal to the CoA shall give notice in writing, which
notice shall be lodged with the registrar of the superior court. The notice shall,
subject to rules 86 and 100, be lodged within 14 days after the date of the
decision against which it is desired to appeal.
A notice of appeal shall be substantially in Form D as set out in the First
Schedule and signed by or on behalf of the appellant.
The notice of appeal shall state whether it is intended to appeal against the
whole or part only of the decision. Where it is intended to appeal against a
part only of the decision, it shall specify the part complained of.
It shall also state the address for service of the appellant and the names and
addresses of the persons intended to be served with copies of the notice.
James Tugee, 2023
NOTICE OF APPEAL (2)
When an appeal lies only with leave or on a certificate that a point of law of
general public importance is involved, it shall not be necessary to obtain such
leave or certificate before lodging the notice of appeal.
Where it is intended to appeal against a decree or order, it shall not be
necessary that the decree or order be extracted before lodging the notice of
appeal.
On receipt of a notice of appeal, the registrar of the superior court shall send
one copy of the notice to the appropriate registry of the CoA.
An intended appellant shall, before or within 7 days after lodging notice of
appeal under, serve copies of the notice on all persons directly affected by
the appeal.
James Tugee, 2023
NOTICE OF APPEAL (3)
The CoA may, on application which may be made ex parte, within 7 days
after the lodging of the notice, direct that service need not be effected on
any person who did not take part in the proceedings in the superior court.
Where any person who is required to be served with a copy of a notice of
appeal gave any address for service in or in connection with the proceedings
in the superior court, and has not subsequently given any other address for
service, the copy of the notice of appeal may be served on that person at
that address.
A notice of appeal shall not be incompetent by reason only that the person
on whom it is required to be served was dead at the time when the notice
was lodged but a copy of the notice shall be served as soon as practicable
on the legal representative of the deceased person.
James Tugee, 2023
II. NOTICE OF ADDRESS FOR SERVICE (FORM E)
Where two or more parties have given notice of appeal from the same
decision, the second and all subsequent notices to be lodged shall be
deemed to be notices of address for service and the party or parties giving
those notices shall be respondents in the appeal.
A party whose notice of appeal is deemed to be a notice of address for
service shall not be required to comply with the requirements on service of a
notice of address for service if that party has served copies of the notice of
appeal on all persons on whom they would have been required to serve the
notice of address for service.
without prior payment of fees of Court, or on payment of any specified amount less
than the required fees; or
without security for costs being lodged, or on lodging of any specified sum less
than the amount fixed by rule 109.
The CoA may also order upon such application that the record of appeal be
prepared by the registrar of the superior court without payment therefor or on
payment of any specified sum less than the fee set out in the Second
Schedule conditionally on the intended appellant undertaking to pay the fees
or the balance of the fees out of any money or properly the appellant may
recover in or consequence of the appeal.
Where an application for a copy of the proceedings in the superior court has
been made within 30 thirty days after the date of the decision against which it
is desired to appeal, there shall, in computing the time within which the
appeal is to be instituted, be excluded such time as may be certified by the
registrar of the superior court as having been required for the preparation and
delivery to the appellant of such copy. For this to be relied upon by the
appellant, the application for such copy must have been made in writing and
a copy of the application must have been served upon the respondent(s).
If a party who has lodged a notice of appeal fails to institute an appeal within
the appointed time, that party shall be deemed to have withdrawn the notice
of appeal and the Court may, on its own motion or on application by any
other party, make such order.
James Tugee, 2023
IV. THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL (FORM F)
A judge or registrar of the superior court may, on the application of any party,
direct which documents or parts of documents should be excluded from the
record and an application for such direction may be made informally.
The documents shall be bound in the order in which they are set out and
documents produced in evidence shall be put in order of the dates they bear
or, where they are undated, the dates when they are believed to have been
made, without regard to the order in which they were produced in evidence.
Each copy of the record of appeal shall be certified to be correct by the
appellant or by any person entitled under rule 22 to appear on the appellant’s
behalf.
The appellant shall, within 7 days after lodging the memorandum of appeal
and the record of appeal in the appropriate registry, serve copies thereof on
each respondent who has complied with the requirements of rule 81 by filing
and serving a notice of address for service.
The appellant shall also serve copies of the memorandum of appeal and the
record of appeal on such other parties to the original proceedings as the
court may, at any time on application or of its own motion, direct and within
such time as the court may appoint.
A respondent who desires to contend at the hearing of the appeal that the
decision of the superior court or any part thereof should be varied or reversed,
in any event or in the event of the appeal being allowed in whole or in part,
shall give notice to that effect (notice of cross-appeal), specifying the grounds
of the contention and nature of the order which they propose to ask the court
to make.
A notice of cross-appeal is lodged in four copies in the appropriate registry not
more than 30 days after service on the respondent of the memorandum of
appeal and record of appeal, or not less than 30 days before the hearing of
the appeal, whichever is the later.
A notice of cross-appeal shall be substantially in Form G as set out in the First
Schedule and signed by or on behalf of the respondent.
James Tugee, 2023
VIII. NOTICE OF GROUNDS FOR AFFIRMING
DECISION (FORM H)
A respondent who desires to contend on an appeal that the decision of the
superior court should be affirmed on grounds other than or additional to those
relied upon by that court shall give notice to that effect (notice of grounds for
affirming decision), specifying the grounds of the respondent’s contention.
A respondent who desires to contend at the hearing of the appeal that part
of the decision of the superior court should be varied or reversed, and that
part of that decision should be affirmed on grounds other than or additional to
those relied upon by that court, may include both such contentions in a
notice of cross-appeal under rule 93 and shall not be required to give notice
of grounds for affirming the decision.
A notice of grounds for affirming a decision shall be substantially in Form H as
set out in the First Schedule and signed by or on behalf of the respondent.
James Tugee, 2023
NOTICE OF GROUNDS FOR AFFIRMING DECISION (2)
The notice shall be lodged in four copies in the appropriate registry not more
than 30 days after service on the respondent of the memorandum of appeal
and record of appeal, or not less than 30 days before the hearing of the
appeal, whichever is the later.
These provisions apply mutatis mutandis to an appellant who desires to
contend, in opposition to a cross-appeal, that the decision of the superior
court should be affirmed on grounds other than or additional to those relied
on by that court.
An appellant may, at any time after instituting an appeal and before the
appeal is called on for hearing, lodge notice in writing of the intention to
withdraw the appeal.
The appellant shall within 7 days after lodging the notice, serve copies thereof
on each respondent who has complied with the requirements of rule 81.
If all the parties to the appeal consent to the withdrawal of the appeal, the
appellant shall file, in the appropriate registry, a consent letter signed by the
parties or their advocates. The appeal shall then be struck out of the list of
pending appeals by the Registrar.
If the parties do not consent to the withdrawal of the appeal, the appellant
may, before the conclusion of its hearing, apply for leave to withdraw the
appeal before a single judge.
James Tugee, 2023
WITHDRAWAL AND SETTLEMENT OF APPEALS (2)
The Registrar shall give all parties to an appeal not less than 14 days’ notice of
the date fixed for the hearing of an appeal except where a matter has been
certified urgent or the court, for good reason, directs that a matter be served
within a shorter period. It shall not be necessary to give such notice to any
party with whose consent the date for the hearing was fixed.
A party who has lodged written submissions may still address the court at the
hearing of the appeal. The order of address shall be as provided under rule 28.
Every appeal shall be heard in court or in any other manner as may be
directed by the court, to which all members of the public shall have access so
far as the space in the court permits and so long as they conduct themselves
in an orderly manner: In exceptional circumstances, the court may direct that
the public be excluded.
James Tugee, 2023
HEARING OF APPEALS (2)
If, on any day fixed for the hearing of an appeal, the appellant does not appear,
the appeal may be dismissed and any cross-appeal may proceed, unless the
court deems fit to adjourn the hearing and, in such instance, may order the
appellant to pay court adjournment fees and costs to the other parties present.
Where an appeal is so dismissed or any cross-appeal so heard is allowed, the
appellant may apply to the court to restore the appeal for hearing or to re-hear
the cross-appeal, if they can show that they prevented by any sufficient cause
from appearing when the appeal was called on for hearing.
If the appellant appears and the respondent fails to appear, the appeal
proceeds in the absence of the respondent and any cross-appeal may be
dismissed, unless the court deems fit to adjourn the hearing and, in such instance,
may order the respondent to pay CAF and the present parties’ costs.
James Tugee, 2023
HEARING OF APPEALS (3)
The court may give judgments at the close of the hearing of an appeal or
reserve the judgment for delivery within 120 days, unless the court for reasons
to be recorded orders otherwise.
Where the court defers a judgment, the court shall notify the parties of the
next date for delivery. The court shall, however, not defer a judgment for more
than 180 days.
The presiding judge may, in any particular case, direct that the decision of the
court only shall be so delivered and not the reasons therefor, and in such a
case the judgment shall be deposited in the Registry or sub-registry in the
place where the appeal was heard and copies thereof shall be available to
the parties when the decision is delivered.
James Tugee, 2023
JUDGMENT (2)
The court may, at the close of the hearing of an appeal, give its decision but
reserve its reasons and in such a case the reasons may be delivered in court or
deposited in the Registry or sub-registry in the place where the application or
appeal was heard within 90 days and where the reasons are so deposited,
copies thereof shall be available to the parties and they shall be so informed.
Where one judgment is given at the close of the hearing as the judgment of
the court, it shall be delivered by the presiding judge or by such other member
of the court as the presiding judge may direct.
Where judgment, or the reasons for a decision, has been reserved, the
judgment of the Court, or a judgment of any judge, or such reasons, as the
case may be, being in writing and signed, may be delivered by any judge,
whether or not he or she sat at the hearing.
James Tugee, 2023
E. APPEALS TO THE SUPREME COURT
Article 163 of the Constitution and Part IV of the Supreme Court Act make
relevant provisions regarding the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals
from the Court of Appeal and any other court or tribunal as prescribed by
legislation.
Appeals lie to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal:
As of right in cases involving the interpretation or application of the Constitution;
In any other case in which the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court certifies
that a matter of general public importance is involved.
An application for certification shall be filed before, and determined by the
Court of Appeal at the first instance.
James Tugee, 2023
APPEALS TO THE SUPREME COURT (2)
A person who intends to make an appeal to the Supreme Court shall file a notice
of appeal within 14 days from the date of judgment or ruling which is the subject
of appeal.
The notice of Appeal is in Form F set out in the First Schedule to the Supreme Court
Rules, 2020 (the Rules) and is filed at the first instance with the Registrar of the
court or with the tribunal from which an appeal originates.
Upon filing of the notice of appeal, the petitioner shall transmit a copy of the
notice to the Registrar.
In lodging an appeal on a matter of general public importance, it shall not be
mandatory to obtain such certification before filing the notice of appeal.
A petitioner shall, within 7 days of lodging a notice of appeal, serve transmitted
Jamescopies
Tugee, 2023 thereof upon all persons directly affected by the appeal.
II. NOTICE OF ADDRESS FOR SERVICE (FORM H)
A petition of appeal shall be as set out in Form G of the First Schedule to the
Rules.
The petition shall contain:
a concise statement of the facts relied upon;
a summary of the grounds for the petition;
a concise presentation of arguments supporting each of the grounds of the
petition;
the relief sought in the petition and any directions sought pursuant to the Rules;
and
a schedule listing all the documents annexed to the petition
James Tugee, 2023
V. RECORD OF APPEAL
For the purpose of instituting an appeal from a Court of Appeal decision, the
record of appeal shall contain:
a certificate, if any, certifying the matter as of general public importance;
the judgment or ruling of the Court of Appeal being appealed from;
a judgment or ruling of the High Court or a court of equal status; and
the relevant pleadings required to determine the appeal.
The court may, on the application of any party, direct certain documents to
be excluded from the record.
Where a document is omitted from the record of appeal, the appellant may
within 15 days of lodging the record of appeal, without leave, include the
document in a supplementary record of appeal.
James Tugee, 2023
RECORD OF APPEAL (2)
pleadings;
the record of proceedings;
the trial judge's notes at the hearing;
the transcript of any shorthand notes taken at the trial;
the affidavits read, and all documents of evidence at the hearing, or, if such
documents are not in the English language, certified translations thereof;
the judgment or ruling;
the certified decree or order; and
such other documents, if any, as may be necessary for the proper determination of
the appeal, including any interlocutory proceedings which may be directly
relevant.
James Tugee, 2023
VI. RESPONSE TO PETITION OF APPEAL
A party shall, within 7 days after the close of pleadings, fill in and submit to the
Registrar a scheduling questionnaire set out in Form A of the First Schedule to
the Rules.
The Registrar shall within 3 days of receiving the filled-in questionnaire,
convene a scheduling conference to, inter alia:
ascertain the contested and agreed issues;
resolve the question whether the parties can reach a settlement out of court;
give directions on the time-frame for oral submissions and filing of written
submissions, list and bundles of authorities, by parties; and
confirm whether the parties’ pleadings confirm with the Rules and with the
practice directions.
James Tugee, 2023
XI. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
The presiding judge shall, within 7 days after the Registrar certifies that the
parties have complied with the directions made at the scheduling
conference, convene a pre-trial conference, to determine preliminary matters
including:
Whether to allow any friend of the court, or interested party in the proceedings;
and
Any other matter requiring determination such as may have been raised at the
scheduling conference.
Any hearing shall be allocated by the court and served on the parties.
Appeals raising similar issues may be heard together or consecutively by the
court as the court may direct.
Proceedings may be conducted in open court or in chambers, as the court
may direct. The court may also conduct virtual hearings through the use of
appropriate technology.
The Registrar shall, unless the court certifies the matter urgent, give parties to
the proceedings a notice of not less than 14 days, ahead of the hearing date.
The court may prescribe the time allowed for making oral presentations,
address by the parties, their advocates or other recognized representatives.
James Tugee, 2023
XIV. WITHDRAWAL OF PROCEEDINGS
A party may, with leave of the court, withdraw the proceedings at any time
before the delivery of judgment.
The court may make an order as to costs, following such withdrawal of
proceedings.
The court shall deliver a judgment on an appeal within 90 days from the last
day of hearing.
The court may issue its decision, while reserving the reasons for such decision
to a later date.
Where the court reserves the reasons for a decision, any judge of the court
may deliver the reasons on a determined date.
The court may review any of its decisions in any circumstances which the court
considers meritorious, exceptional, and in the public interest, either on the
court’s own motion or upon application by a party.
A party may apply for formal correction of a judgment.
James Tugee, 2023
CIVIL LITIGATION
TOPIC 16:
CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION
AREAS TO COVER
A. Introduction.
B. Justiciability.
C. Jurisdiction.
D. The Mutunga Rules.
E. Remedies.
The promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 brought with it a new era
regarding the recognition, protection and enforcement of rights and
fundamental freedoms.
There are more robust provisions in the 2010 constitution for the enforcement of
the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as a whole than previously existed.
The Constitution adopts a broader approach to standing in constitutional
litigation.
The Constitution has also sought to improve access to justice by, inter alia,
doing away with or reducing the technical and financial hurdles that in the
past hindered access to justice.
A person acting on behalf of another person who cannot act in their own name.
A person acting as a member of, or in the interest of, a group or class of persons.
A person acting in the public interest.
An association acting in the interest of one or more of its members.
Provided that the court has jurisdiction to grant the relief sought, petitioners
will have standing if there is an allegation that a right in the Bill of Rights has
been denied, violated, infringed, or threatened, or the Constitution has been
contravened or threatened with contravention. Of course, the petitioner
needs to demonstrate that there is sufficient interest, not necessarily the
petitioner’s, in obtaining the remedy sought.
The primary rationale for the doctrine of ripeness is to “prevent the courts,
through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in
abstract disagreements.” See Abbott Laboratories v Gardner [1967] U.S. 136,
148.
The doctrine of mootness, on the other hand, holds that a case is not
justiciable “if it no longer presents an existing or live controversy which should
exist if the court is to avoid giving advisory opinions on abstract propositions of
law.” National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home
Affairs [2000] (2) SA 1 (CC).
In John Harun Mwau & 3 others v Attorney General & 2 others [2012] eKLR, the
court stated that:
James Tugee, 2023
RIPENESS AND MOOTNESS (2)
“… the jurisdiction to interpret the constitution… does not exist in a vacuum and it is
not exercised independently in the absence of a real dispute [but in] the context of a
dispute or controversy.”
The recognition by the Constitution that that proceedings may be instituted
alleging that a right in the Bill of Rights is threatened or that the Constitution is
threatened with contravention significantly limits the scope of what in those
proceedings would be held not justiciable under the doctrine of ripeness.
The implication is that before a court is willing to provide a constitutional
relief, it has to be established that an actual or imminent harm to a right in
the Bill of Rights or to the Constitution is faced.
In Supreme Court Petitions Nos. 14, 14A, 14B & 14C of 2014 (Consolidated)
Communications Commission of Kenya & 5 others v Royal Media Services
Limited & 5 others [2014] eKLR (the Digital Migration Case), the Supreme Court
held that the claims for violation of intellectual property rights under Article 40
of the Constitution were improperly framed as a constitutional issue since a
claim for copyright infringement could instead have been made on the same
facts under the Copyright Act.
On the other hand, issues are moot when they no longer affect the interests
of the parties or no longer present an existing or live controversy. Mootness is
determined with reference to the date of the hearing before the court or
even when the court decides the matter.
James Tugee, 2023
C. JURISDICTION
Article 23(1) of the Constitution provides that the High Court has jurisdiction, in
accordance with Article 165, to hear and determine applications for redress of
a denial, violation or infringement of, or threat to, a right or fundamental
freedom in the Bill of Rights.
Article 165(3)(b) provides that the High Court shall have jurisdiction to
determine the question whether a right or fundamental freedom in the Bill of
Rights has been denied, violated, infringed or threatened.
Article 165(3)(d) then provides for the jurisdiction of the High Court to hear any
question respecting the interpretation of the Constitution, including, inter alia,
whether any law is inconsistent with or in contravention of the Constitution and
whether anything said to be done under the authority of the Constitution or of
any law is inconsistent with or in contravention of the Constitution.
James Tugee, 2023
JURISDICTION (2)
The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 23(1) of the Constitution is,
however, not intended to be exclusive.
Article 23(2), for instance, provides for the enactment of legislation to give
original jurisdiction in appropriate cases to subordinate courts to hear and
determine applications for redress of a denial, violation or infringement, or
threat to, a right or fundamental freedom in the Bill of Rights.
Section 8 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act, No. 26 of 2015, in this regard, provides
for the jurisdiction of Magistrates’ Courts in claims relating to violation of
human rights. The jurisdiction is limited by the pecuniary limitations under
section 7 of the Act and the provision that such applications made to the
Magistrates Courts “shall only relate to the rights guaranteed in Article 25 (a)
and (b) of the Constitution.”
James Tugee, 2023
JURISDICTION (3)
Article 22(3) of the Constitution confers on the Chief Justice power to make
rules providing for the court proceedings referred to in Article 22 of the
Constitution (for enforcement of the Bill of Rights). In the exercise of these
powers, The Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013 (the Mutunga Rules) were
made by the then Chief Justice.
The Mutunga Rules define ‘High Court’ to mean the High Court and courts with
the status of a High Court (the ELC and ELRC).
Consequently, the High Court, ELC and ELRC have original jurisdiction to hear
and determine petitions for the enforcement of rights and fundamental
freedoms.
James Tugee, 2023
JURISDICTION (4)
The special subject matter jurisdictions of the ELC and ELRC means that the
original jurisdiction of these courts in constitutional matters should be invoked
where the constitutional questions relate to the special subject matter
jurisdiction of the courts.
Regarding appellate jurisdiction in constitutional litigation, the Court of Appeal
has jurisdiction to hear appeals from the High Court and any other court or
tribunal as prescribed by an Act of Parliament. Appeals from the High Court,
ELC and ELRC lie to the Court of Appeal.
Finally, appeals lie to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal as of right in
any case involving the interpretation or application of the Constitution.
TOPIC 17:
PROCEDURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW
AREAS TO COVER
Where the circumstances so require, the judge may direct that the application
be served for hearing inter partes before grant of leave. The judge may also
direct in appropriate cases that the question of leave and whether grant of
leave shall operate as stay may be heard and determined separately within 7
days.
The promulgation of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, which provides for judicial
review as a possible constitutional remedy [see Article 23(3)] and for the right
to fair administrative action (Article 47), has led to debates whether leave is still
a requirement to commence judicial review proceedings. The provision for
judicial review in the Fair Administrative Action Act (FAAA), which is the
legislation enacted pursuant to Article 47(3) of the Constitution to give effect
to the right to fair administrative action, has only heightened the debate.
James Tugee, 2023
PROCEDURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW(2)
When leave has been granted to apply for an order of mandamus, prohibition
or certiorari, the substantive judicial review application is made within 21 days
by notice of motion to the High Court.
There shall, unless the judge granting leave has otherwise directed, be at least
8 clear days between the service of the notice of motion and the day named
therein for the hearing.
The notice of motion is served on all persons directly affected, and where it
relates to any proceedings in or before a court, and the object is either to
compel the court or an officer thereof to do any action in relation to the
proceedings or to quash them or any order made therein, the notice of
motion shall be served on the presiding officer of the court and on all parties
to the proceedings.
James Tugee, 2023
PROCEDURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW(4)
Copies of the statement accompanying the application for leave are served
with the notice of motion. Copies of any affidavits accompanying the
application for leave are supplied on demand.
An affidavit of service is then filed before the application is set down for
hearing. If any person who ought to be served has not been served, the
affidavit ought to state that fact and the reason why service has not been
effected.
If on the hearing of the motion the High Court is of the opinion that any person
who ought to have been served therewith has not been served, the court may
adjourn the hearing, in order that the notice may be served on that person,
upon such terms (if any) as the court may direct.
James Tugee, 2023
PROCEDURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW(4)
At the hearing of the motion, no grounds shall be relied upon or any relief
sought except the grounds and relief set out in the statement that is filed with
the application for leave and served with the notice of motion. The court may,
however, on the hearing of the motion allow the said statement to be
amended, and may allow further affidavits to be used if they deal with new
matters arising out of the affidavits of any other party to the application.
Where the applicant intends to ask to be allowed to amend his statement or
use further affidavits, he shall give notice of his intention and of any proposed
amendment of his statement, and shall supply on demand copies of any such
further affidavits.
Every party to the proceedings shall supply to any other party, on demand,
copies of the affidavits which he proposes to use at the hearing.
James Tugee, 2023
PROCEDURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW(5)
On the hearing of a judicial review application, the applicant shall have the
right to begin.
Any person who desires to be heard in opposition to the motion and appears
to the court to be a proper person to be heard shall be heard,
notwithstanding that he has not been served with the notice or summons, and
shall be liable to costs in the discretion of the court if the order should be
made.
TOPIC 17:
COSTS
AREAS TO COVER
A. Introduction.
B. Types of costs.
C. Possible costs orders.
D. General principles on the award of costs
E. Taxation of Bills of Costs.
F. Principles of taxation of Bills of Costs.
Party and party costs: These are costs awarded by a court in favour of a party
against another. Usually, the prevailing party in litigation receives these costs to
pay for their reasonable legal expenses. For instance, in a civil suit by
Company A against Company B for breach of contract, if the court finds in
favour of Company A, the court may order Company B to pay the party and
party costs incurred by Company A during the litigation.
Advocate-client (attorney-client) costs: All the costs in respect of which the
client is indebted for professional services rendered by his/her attorney in legal
proceedings to which the attorney had been formally mandated to act.
Thrown away costs: costs either unnecessarily incurred by a party as a result of
some procedural error committed by the other party or properly incurred but
wasted as a result of a subsequent act of the other party.
James Tugee, 2023
TYPES OF COSTS (2)
Wasted costs: Litigation costs which must be paid by an advocate where the
court considers that the advocate has wasted another party’s or the
advocate's own client's costs or that there has been negligence in a serious
degree which warrants an order of costs being made as a mark of the court’s
displeasure.
The basic rule on the award of costs is “costs follow the event”.
Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that:
The Supreme Court, in Jasbir Singh Rai & 3 others v Tarlochan Singh Rai & 4
others [2014] eKLR, cited with approval the above passage from Judicial Hints
on Civil Procedure and went on to state, “whether in this court or any other
superior court, costs are awarded at the discretion of the court or judge.”
The Supreme Court also cited with approval Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th
Edition Re-Issue (2010), Vol. 10, at para. 16:
“The court has discretion as to whether costs are payable by one party to another,
the amount of those costs, and when they are to be paid. Where costs are in the
discretion of the court, a party has no right to costs unless and until the court awards
them to him, and the court has an absolute and unfettered discretion to award or not
award them. This discretion must be exercised judicially; it must not be exercised
arbitrarily but in accordance with reason and justice.” (Emphasis added)
James Tugee, 2023
II. COSTS FOLLOW THE EVENT
In Nairobi High Court Civil Suit No. 66 of 2009 Joseph Oduor Anode v Kenya
Red Cross Society [2012] eKLR, Odunga, J (as he then was) observed:
“…whereas this Court has the discretion when awarding costs, that discretion
must, as usual, be exercised judicially. The first point of reference, with respect
to the exercise of discretion is the guiding principles provided under the law. In
matters of costs, the general rule as adumbrated in the aforesaid statute [the
Civil Procedure Act] is that costs follow the event unless the court is satisfied
otherwise.” (Emphasis added)
This principle means that a successful party is ordinarily entitled to an award of
costs.
In taxing bills of costs and considering the above general principles of taxation,
taxing officers can get guidance from various principles developed by the
courts over time, including:
The instruction fee payable to an advocate should be based on the value
of the subject matter, the complexity of the work to be carried out and all
other circumstances of the case. See Premchand Raichand Ltd (supra).
The value of the subject matter is to be determined from the pleadings,
judgment or settlement (if such be the case) but if it is not so ascertainable
the taxing officer is entitled to use his discretion to assess such instruction fee
as he considers just. See Joreth Limited v Kigano & Associates [2002] 1 EA
92.
James Tugee, 2023
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION OF BILLS OF COSTS (3)