Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

BOMBAY HIGHCOURT

OFFICER CAUSELIST CAUSELIST


For Tuesday The 12th March 2024
COURT NO. 27
SINGLE
AT 12:30 PM
SHRI. S.R. AGRAWAL, REGISTRAR(JUDL II)

HEADER NOTE :
AT 12.30 PM

Sr. CASE NO. PARTIES ADVOCATES

FOR ORDERS (UNSERVED NOTICES)

1 CRA/278/2023 HARIRAM REDEKAR HELEKAR NEEL GIRISH


[Civil] VS Aditi Naikare
SMT. JAYASHREEBAI DHONDU
CHAVAN (SINCE DECEASED) THR.
LRS. ASHOK DHONDU CHAVAN AND
ORS.
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) AS PER COURT'S ORDER DTD. 20/09/2023 NOTICE ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT
NOS. 1 TO 5. ## 2) NOTICE DULY SERVED ON RESPONDENT NOS 2 AND 4 AND UNSERVED ON
RESPONDENT NOS 1, 3, 3A, 3B AND 5 WITH BAILIFF REMARKS RESPONDENT NOS 1, 3, 3A, 3B "NOT
RESIDING AT PRESENT ADDRESS AND NO ONE KNOWS THEIR PRESENT ADDRESS". AND "DOOR OF
RESPONDENT NO 5 FOUND LOCK AFTER ENQUIRY WITH MR. PATIL OCCUPANT IN SAID CHAWL, HE WAS
INFORMED THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT RESP. NO. 5". HENCE RETURN UNSERVED. ##
ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT TAKE STEPS AGAINST UNSERVED RESPONDENT NOS. 1, 3, 3A, 3B &
5 TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

2 CRA/369/2023 RAJKUMAR D. SARAF N D JAYWANT


[Civil] VS
SMT. DAKHIBAI SINGHANIA
DHARAMSHALA TRUST,
GOPIKUMAR BHAGWANDAS
SINGHANIA AND ORS.
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) AS PER COURT'S ORDER DATED 25/08/2023, NOTICE ISSUED TO THE
RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 5 ## 2) AS PER BAILIFF REPORT DATED 13/10/2023 NOTICE DULY SERVED ON
RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 5 AND UNSERVED ON RESPONDENT NO. 1, AS PER REMARK "SAID
RESPONDENT NO. 1 EXPIRED IN FEBRUARY 2018." ## 3) ADV. FOR APPLICANT HAS NOT TAKEN STEPS
AGAINST UNSERVED / EXPIRED RESPONDENT NO. 1 TILL TODAY. 4) I.A. NO. 13400 OF 2023 (FOR STAY) IS
KEPT HEREWITH. ## 3RD TIME.

with

IA/13400/2023 RAJKUMAR D. SARAF N D JAYWANT


[Civil] VS N D JAYWANT

11/03/2024 17:58:59 1/5


OFFICER CAUSELIST CAUSELIST COURT NO 27-FOR TUESDAY THE 12TH MARCH 2024 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 2 -

SMT. DAKHIBAI SINGHANIA D


In HARAMSHALA TRUST, GOPIKUM
CRA/369/2023 AR BHAGWANDAS SINGHANIA A
ND ORS.

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

3 CRA/629/2023 NIRMALA SUBHASH SHARMA JAIDEEP THAKKAR


[Civil] VS Ashok M Saraogi
SUBHASH MAHESH SHARMA
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTION. ## 2) AS PER ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
DATED 03/03/2021 CRA (ST.) IS NUMBERED. ## FOLLOWING THE OFFICE OBJECTION:- ## (A) THERE
ARE UNDERLINES / MARKINGS ON DOCUMENT PRESENTED AT PAGE NO. 141 & 151. ## ADV. FOR THE
APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

4 CRA/661/2023 PRAKASH KISANLAL LODHA Prafulla Paranjape


[Civil] VS
PRASHANT SOHANLAL BAJ AND
ORS.
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTION. ## 2) AS PER ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
DATED 03/03/2021 CRA (ST.) IS NUMBERED. ## FOLLOWING ARE OBJECTIOSN:- ## A) XEROX COPIES
ANNEXED ARE NOT LEGIBLE AND SMALL FONT AT PAGE NOS 79 TO 85, 116, 170 TO 172, 191 TO 193, 204
TO 212, 231 TO 236 ## B) THERE ARE UNDERLINE ON DOCUMENT PRESENTED PAGE NO. 35, 36, 46, 49
TO 71 ## C) CAVEAT STATEMENT NOT STATED. ## ADVOCATE FOR APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVE
OFFICE OBJECTIONS TILL TODAY ## 2ND TIME.

5 CRA(ST)/34203/2023 MOIN AKHTAR S/O ABDUL SATTAR Asutosh Shukla


[Civil] VS
MOHD. SIDDIQUE HAJI BASHIR
AHMED(DECEASED) THR,LRS
SAYED AKHTAR QURESHI
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS. ## FOLLOWING ARE THE OFFICE
OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) CHALLENGE IN BRIEF STATEMENT NOT STATED IN SYNOPSIS. ## (B) THE
PHOTOCOPIES ANNEXED ARE NOT LEGIBLE AT PAGE NOS. 73, 74, 135 TO 137, 140 TO 142. ## (C) THERE
ARE UNDERLINES / MARKINGS ON DOCUMENTS AT PAGE NOS. 66, 67, 143 TO 148. ## ADV. FOR THE
APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTIONS TILL TODAY. ## 3RD TIME.

with

IA(ST)/34204/2023 MOIN AKHTAR S/O ABDUL SAT Asutosh Shukla


[Civil] TAR Asutosh Shukla
VS
MOHD. SIDDIQUE HAJI BASHI
R AHMED

6 CRA(ST)/34728/2023 SOPAN BABURAO BALWADKAR BHARAT GADHAVI


[Civil] VS
SUSHILA MAHADU SAWANT
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS. ## FOLLOWING ARE THE OFFICE
OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) CRA (ST.) IS FILED BEYOND THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD OF LIMITATION BY 8 DAYS
AND CRA (ST.) DOES NOT ACCOMPANY THE DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATION. ## (B) THE
PHOTOCOPIES ANNEXED ARE NOT LEGIBLE AT PAGE NOS. 28, 31, 33 TO 44, 117, 118, 180 TO 183. ##
ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTIONS TILL TODAY. ## 3RD TIME.

11/03/2024 17:58:59 2/5


OFFICER CAUSELIST CAUSELIST COURT NO 27-FOR TUESDAY THE 12TH MARCH 2024 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 3 -

7 CRA(ST)/35088/2023 VISHWAS CHINTAMANI Mandar G Bagkar


[Civil] DESHCHOUGALE (GULAVANI)
(SINCE DEC.) BHUSAHN C.
DESHCHOUGULE
VS
HANMANT ANANDRAO YADAV AND
ORS.
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS. ## FOLLOWING ARE THE OFFICE
OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) NAMES OF THE RESPONDENT NO. 10 STATED IN THE APPLICATION DO NOT
CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS GIVEN IN CERTIFIED COPIES ANNEXED. ## (B) BLANK PORTION ARE
NOT FILL-UP AT PAGE IN INTERIM APPLICATION DOCKET. ## ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT
REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTIONS TILL TODAY. ## 3RD TIME.

with

IA(ST)/35089/2023 SHRI.VISHWAS CHINTAMANI D Mandar G Bagkar


[Civil] ESHCHOUGULE (GULAVANI) TH Mandar G Bagkar
R. LRA.
VS
HANMANT ANANDRAO YADAV AN
D ORS.

8 CRA/27/2024 SHABBIR TRADING CORPORATION, Aditya Talpade


[Civil] THR. PROPRIETORS, 1.ALI MOH. Balasaheb Deshmukh
FAKHRUDDIN BAWAJI 2. KHOZEMA
F. BAWAJI
VS
GANESH KESHAV PALAV
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS. ## FOLLOWING ARE THE OFFICE
OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) NAME OF THE APPLICANT NO. 2 STATED IN APPLICATION DO NOT CORRESPOND
WITH THE NAMES OF GIVEN IN CERTIFIED COPIES ANNEXED. ## (B) PLAINT COPY NOT FILED. ## (C)
CAVEAT STATEMENT NOT STATED. ## ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE
OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 3RD TIME.

9 CRA(ST)/130/2024 RAJNIKANTH DURLABJI SANCHALA Dharmendra Damani


[Civil] VS
SUNIL S/O JAYANTILAL SHAH AND
ORS.
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTIONS. ## FOLLOWING ARE THE OFFICE
OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) BLANK PORTIONS ARE NOT FILL UP AT PAGE NO. 109, & SUIT NO. ## (B)
CHALLENGE IN BRIEF NOT STATED. ## (C) CAVEAT STATEMENT NOT STATED. ## ADV. FOR THE
APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTIONS TILL TODAY. ## 3RD TIME.

10 CRA(ST)/2398/2024 MADHUKAR DINKAR DHORE VISHAL KOLEKAR


[Civil] VS
TAI MAHENDRA OVHAL
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTIONS :- ## (A) BLANK
PORTIONS ARE NOT FILL UP AT PAGE NOS. 18 AND I.A. (ST.) PAGE NOS. 6 & 8. ## (B) DELAY DAYS
DIFFER IN INTERIM APPLICATION (ST.) ## ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE
OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

with

IA(ST)/2399/2024 MADHUKAR DINKAR DHORE VISHAL KOLEKAR

11/03/2024 17:58:59 3/5


OFFICER CAUSELIST CAUSELIST COURT NO 27-FOR TUESDAY THE 12TH MARCH 2024 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 4 -

[Civil] VS VISHAL KOLEKAR


TAI MAHENDRA OVHAL

11 CRA(ST)/2802/2024 ILLAHI MAHAMMAD LAKADWALE Patil Kalpesh Uttam


[Civil] VS
YASHWANT KONDIBA MULE
(DECEASED)
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTION :- ## (A) NAME OF THE
RESPONDENT STATED IN THE APPLICATION DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE NAMES AS GIVEN IN THE
CERTIFIED COPIES ANNEXED. ## ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTION
TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

with

IA(ST)/2804/2024 ILLAHI MAHAMMAD LAKADWALE Patil Kalpesh Uttam


[Civil] VS Patil Kalpesh Uttam
YASHWANT KONDIBA MULE (DE
CEASED) THR LRS.

12 CRA(ST)/2809/2024 M/S KRUSHNA CONSTRUCTIONS KAUTUBH PAWAR


[Civil] THROUGH MR. SUNIL DATTARAYA
PATIL
VS
SOU. ASHA RAVINDRA GAIKWAD
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER OFFICE OBJECTION. ## FOLLOWING THE OFFICE
OBJECTION :- ## (A) CAVEAT STATEMENT NOT STATED. ## ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT
REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME

13 CRA(ST)/3223/2024 CHANDULAL HANSRAJ POKAR HN Legal


[Civil] VS
KAISAR JAMEEL KHAN THR.
CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY FIROZ
ABDUL WAHAB SHAIKH
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTIONS :- ## (A) THERE ARE
UNDERLINES / MARKINGS ON DOCUMENTS AT PAGE NOS. 60 TO 72. ## (B) BLANK PORTIONS ARE NOT
FILL UP AT PAGE NOS. 54, 73 to 94. ## (C) CAVEAT STATEMENT NOT STATED. ## ADV. FOR THE
APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

14 CRA(ST)/3393/2024 NARANGS HOTELS (P) LTD. ZAK Najam es sani


[Civil] VS Ahmed Saeed Uraizee
SMT. SARLA HIRA ADVANI
(DELETED SINCE DEAD)
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) THAT THE CRA
(ST.) IS ACCOMPANIED BY A CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 29/11/2023 AND JUDGMENT DATED
29/02/2020 NOT ACCOMPANIED. ## (B) THE PHOTOCOPIES ANNEXED ARE NOT LEGIBLE AT PAGE NOS.
140, 189, 192 & 197. ## (C) THERE ARE UNDERLINES / MARKINGS ON DOCUMENTS PRESENTED AT PAGE
NOS. 67-B TO 67-E. ## (D) BLANK PORTIONS ARE NOT FILL UP AT PAGE NO. 10 IN I.A. (ST). ## ADV. FOR
THE APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

with

IA(ST)/3394/2024 NARANGS HOTELS (P) LTD. ZAK Najam es sani


[Civil] VS ZAK Najam es sani
SMT. SARLA HIRA ADVANI (D MADNESH SINGH

11/03/2024 17:58:59 4/5


OFFICER CAUSELIST CAUSELIST COURT NO 27-FOR TUESDAY THE 12TH MARCH 2024 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 5 -

ELETED SINCE DEAD) Ahmed Saeed Uraizee

15 CRA(ST)/3876/2024 SHRI. KRISHNA VITTHAL BHOSALE Mandar Limaye


[Civil] VS
SHRI. AJAY RAMCHANDRA BHOSALE
REMARK : NOTE :- ## 1) CRA (ST.) IS UNDER FOLLOWING OFFICE OBJECTIONS:- ## (A) BLANK
PORTIONS ARE NOT FILL UP AT PAGE NO. 21. ## (B) CAVEAT AND SLP STATEMENT NOT STATED. ##
ADV. FOR THE APPLICANT HAS NOT REMOVED OFFICE OBJECTION TILL TODAY. ## 1ST TIME.

11/03/2024 17:58:59 5/5

You might also like