Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Constraints and Organizational Outcomes Modeling Communities of Municipal Police
Environmental Constraints and Organizational Outcomes Modeling Communities of Municipal Police
http://pqx.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Police Executive Research Forum
Police Section of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences
Additional services and information for Police Quarterly can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://pqx.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://pqx.sagepub.com/content/2/2/174.refs.html
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
AND ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES:
MODELING COMMUNITIES OF
MUNICIPAL POLICE DEPARTMENTS
DOUGLAS R. DAVENPORT
Truman State University
emphasis on crime fighting by both the public and the police themselves;
and (c) the collection of vast quantities of crime-related data on a regular
basis. Together, these factors have made police departments obvious targets
for performance evaluations. Of course, this has not automatically resulted
in appropriate or accurate evaluations. However, this preoccupation with
performance demonstrates the salience of review from both an internal and
external perspective.
Of course, all this presumes that performance (no matter how it is mea-
sured) is amenable to agency manipulation. This is a foundational presump-
tion on the part of strategic management initiatives (broadly conceived),
which suggest that organizational rationality results in goal maximization
and efficiency. Strategic management of this sort is not new and encom-
passes the notions of management by objectives (Drucker, 1954), total per-
formance management (National Center for Productivity and Quality of
Working Life, 1978), transformational leadership (Tichy & Ulrich, 1984),
teamwork (Orsburn, Moran, Musselwhite, Zenger, & Perrin, 1996), and the
most current variation—total quality management (Denhardt, 1995).
Productivity improvement efforts for policing agencies have often
proven to be unfruitful (Wycoff, 1982). Previous studies have failed to con-
sistently demonstrate the ability of police departments to lower crime rates
(Allison, 1972; Decker, 1979; Jacob, Lineberry, Heinz, Rich, & Swank,
1982; Levine, 1975), raise clearance rates (Greenwood, Chaiken, &
Petersilia, 1977), or even improve public feelings of safety (Kelling, Pate,
Dieckman, & Brown, 1974). Indeed, publicized rhetoric in recent years
suggests that criminal justice leaders have recognized this, leading to a call
for partnerships between citizens and the police because the latter cannot
complete the task of crime prevention alone (Brown, 1992; Sessions, 1990).
Of course, this acknowledgment has not prevented public officials (includ-
ing law enforcement agency heads) from claiming credit for recent drops in
reported crime (Metzgar, 1996; Vader, 1996; Weiss, 1996).
If police agency efforts fail to provide adequate explanation for perfor-
mance, what alternatives exist? A viable avenue of research considers the
role of environmental characteristics in determining performance. Such
studies are founded on the tenets of contingency theory, whereby external
factors are critically important to the formation, structure, and success of
firms (for a broad overview, see Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967).
ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS
The importance of the environment has led various organizational theo-
rists and management researchers to conceptualize and measure the envi-
ronment. The environment has generally been assessed along three dimen-
sions: complexity, dynamism, and resource availability (Sharfman & Dean,
1991). These dimensions are common threads running through the re-
search, as Sharfman and Dean (1991) note,
Throughout this literature we have found discussion of (a) the degree to which the
number and sophistication of elements in the environment make understanding it
more difficult; (b) the stability/predictability of an environment; and (c) the level of
resources available in an environment, relative to the number of firms competing for
those resources. (p. 684)
This focus led Sharfman and Dean to create a model that incorporated a
number of variables that captured these three dimensions. However, this
work was applied to private sector firms, and the variables used by
Sharfman and Dean in factor analysis are not applicable to the public sector.
Of course, the importance of the environment to public agencies has been
recognized, and applications of the open systems perspective to public sec-
tor organizations have become increasingly numerous. However, studies
generally conceptualize it in a political sense (Denhardt, 1995; Fried, 1976;
Rosen, 1993). Some prescriptive works have pointed out other aspects but
provide little direction for measuring them.
It is important to recognize that most bureaucracies operate in an envi-
ronment that supercedes strictly political aspects. Recent developments in
the literature note that the openness of the environment requires large
degrees of interorganizational cooperation (Alter & Hage, 1993). At the
local level, this system includes significant numbers of private entities con-
nected vis-à-vis measures such as privatization (Savas, 1982) and the cre-
ation of enterprise zones.
Relevant to this study is the observation that researchers have noted the
salience of community complexity for organizational structures (Lang-
worthy, 1985; Weisheit, Falcone, & Wells, 1994), degrees of agency profes-
sionalization (Henderson, 1975), and organizational effectiveness (Cord-
ner, 1989). The influence of environmental turbulence has also been
observed and measured with some validity (Culbreth, 1993).
POLICE EFFECTIVENESS
A number of studies of police agencies have considered variables that are
external to the organization yet appear to play an important role in effective-
ness. Wellford (1974) found that crime rates are significantly affected by
socioeconomic variables. In contrast, social control variables (number and
rate of police, ratio of civilian personnel to sworn, and two budgetary mea-
sures) failed to explain a significant proportion of the variation.
Pogue (1975) conducted a statistical analysis to assess the effects of cer-
tain environmental characteristics and police expenditures on crime rates
and clearance rates. Pogue used 1968 data from 66 standard metropolitan
statistical areas (SMSAs) to assess clearance rates and used both linear and
log-linear equations. His research determined that both local- and state-
level police expenditures had no significant effect on clearance rates. One
environmental variable, population density, was significantly related to
clearance rate, showing a negative effect.
Pogue’s (1975) work is important to this research because he recognized
the influence of environmental factors and attempted to assess their effects.
Furthermore, he observed some degree of influence of community com-
plexity on effectiveness but did not comment on this finding in his conclu-
sion. Unfortunately, Pogue aggregated departmental statistics at the SMSA
level, making local variation impossible to assess.
A study conducted by Cordner (1989) is also important to this research
agenda. Cordner assessed the relationship between agency size, environ-
mental characteristics, and clearance rates. Cordner used the number of
sworn officers to represent agency size. Environmental characteristics were
region (area of the state), number of index crimes per sworn officer, and the
proportion of property crimes to total index crimes.
In conducting regression analysis on 1986 data for 84 police agencies in
the state of Maryland, Cordner (1989) found that region accounted for
almost all of the explained variance (p. 151). Nonmetropolitan status was
positively associated with clearance rates and was statistically significant
(beta = .54, p < .01). In addition, the portion of property crimes variable was
RESEARCH HYPOTHESES
Three general questions are considered in this study and are examined
through two hypotheses. First, can the public sector environment be
reduced to a manageable number of theoretically sound measures? The first
research hypothesis asserts that it can be: Environmental variables salient to
the public sector represent underlying dimensions that can be discovered.
of clearance data into the two general categories of property and violent
offenses.4 The property crime category includes the offenses classified as
burglary, larceny theft, and motor vehicle theft. The violent crime category
includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery,
and aggravated assault.
This study uses general purpose police departments–report uniform
crime report (UCR) data sent to the Texas Department of Public Safety.
Thus, it does not include county sheriff’s agencies or special purpose agen-
cies (such as school district or housing authority law enforcement entities)
that report UCR data. The study is also limited to municipalities with a pop-
ulation of 10,000 or greater in the 1990 census.
The selection of agencies serving municipalities of 10,000 or greater
may seem to be an unfortunate limitation. However, these 170 departments
accounted for 87.2% of all full-time law enforcement personnel working for
Texas municipal agencies in 1993 (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1994).5
Furthermore, these departments reported 80.2% of all Part 1 index offenses
reported in Texas for the year 1994 (compiled from UCR data, FBI, 1995).
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
A number of environmental variables are included in this study so that
the multiple dimensions of complexity, turbulence, and resource capacity
may be tapped via factor analysis. First of all, patent indicators of complex-
ity include urbanism, density, population, number of law enforcement
agencies in the county, foreign-born population, and minority population.
Urbanism is measured as the percentage of the county that is classified as
urban by the Census Bureau (Crank & Wells, 1991). Density is the popula-
tion per square mile (Pogue, 1975). Population is the municipal population
as measured by the Census Bureau. Agency is operationalized as the number
of municipal and county law enforcement agencies in the county. This mea-
sure is directly related to the complexity of the organizational environment
and is particularly relevant for police departments.
Minority status and foreign-born population tap the cultural and racial
diversity of a community. The former concept is operationalized as percent-
age African American and percentage Hispanic.6 The latter concept is
operationalized as the percentage of the population that was foreign born.
This appears to be quite relevant for Texas, where immigration from Central
America has been a significant issue. All of the demographic variables
taken from census data reflect 1990 information.
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
As discussed previously, a number of variables are available that assess
some aspect of the performance of police departments. During the past two
decades, researchers have moved away from examinations of crime rates or
clearance rates. As for reported crime rates, scholars have argued that the re-
lationship between the inputs (police) and the ultimate goal (reduction of
crime) is indirect (Wycoff, 1982). Instead, Wycoff (1982, p. 25) suggests
that intermediate goals be considered, such as crime management. Wycoff
(1982) describes it the following way:
The concept of crime management acknowledges that crime will occur despite the
most vigorous and effective police efforts at crime prevention. Given the existence of
crime, police can act to reduce its social costs by working to contain it within certain
geographic areas, by working to reduce the amount of physical injury or property loss
or damage, by providing assistance to victims (to include the recover of property or
assistance in acquiring compensation for damage or loss), and by providing reassur-
ance to the public.
MODEL DEVELOPMENT
The purpose of factor analysis is to discover the underlying dimensions
that connect interrelated variables (Kim & Mueller, 1978; Norusis, 1992).
Factor analysis is useful as a data reduction technique (Miller & Whitehead,
1996), particularly when source variables are highly correlated. An exami-
nation of the zero-order correlations suggests that factor analysis is an
appropriate methodology for this data set.
Table 1 presents the results of factor analysis using the environmental
characteristics discussed above.9 The results in Table 1 were obtained using
a varimax (orthogonal) rotation with principal components analysis for
extraction (Norusis, 1992, p. 59). This particular algorithm is appropriate
when seeking to obtain factors that are uncorrelated, and it provides a sim-
ple structure (Norusis, 1994).
Four factors were extracted from these variables, which generally corre-
spond to the three dimensions discussed by Sharfman and Dean (1991),
along with the added dimension of violent crime. First of all, environmental
complexity is tapped via the variables of urbanism, number of law enforce-
ment agencies in the county, and population density. Population, which is
often used as a surrogate for this concept, shows only modest loading on this
factor. Thus, it seems clear that complexity is more than a function of popu-
lation. Per capita income also loads to some degree on this factor, suggest-
ing that economic and class distinctions are evident in heterogeneous
communities.
The dimension of resource capacity is observed through the variables
Hispanic population, unemployment, poverty, per capita income, and per-
cent foreign born.10 The fact that two of the minority variables load heavily
on this factor is not particularly surprising, based on the linkages between
poverty, unemployment, Hispanic population, and foreign-born popula-
tion. In Texas, this appears to be something of a regional characteristic, one
observed most often in the border counties near Mexico.11 Clearly, Hispan-
ics in these cities are disproportionately poor and unemployed.
The variables, mobility, population change, density change, and urban-
ism, change load appropriately on the environmental turbulence factor. As
Table 1 also shows, the resource variables that suggest a lack of capacity
(primarily unemployment and poverty) have negative loadings on the turbu-
lence factor. This indicates that turbulence may not have a particularly nega-
tive influence on communities.
that higher crime rates are not exclusively associated with large population
centers.
Finally, the linkage between relatively higher levels of violent crime and
African American population is consistent with other data. Walker (1994, p. 7)
notes that virtually all murders during a one-year period in Washington, DC
occurred in the poor African American neighborhoods on the eastside. Only
a few took place in the northwest sector, which is predominately White.
Although murder is only a small proportion of all violent crime that occurs,
this data indicate that the Texas statistics are not anomalous.13
The extraction of this fourth factor is not surprising because crime vari-
ables are included in the analysis. Based on the connection between the
crime factor and population, it may be appropriate to view the violent crime
factor as an additional component of environmental complexity. It is clear
that crime is interwoven with these other characteristics, significantly influ-
encing life within these communities.
As expected, these results illustrate the multifaceted nature of the
responding communities. They support the findings of Crank and Wells
(1991) with regard to the linkage between urbanism and heterogeneity, as
well as the more general observations of Cordner (1989) with regard to the
distinctions between metropolitan and rural communities.
The close parallel between these findings and the Sharfman and Dean
(1991) model is particularly noteworthy, considering the use of general
demographic and socioeconomic data rather than private sector business
and industry variables. Clearly, the results demonstrate the utility of a more
general model of the public sector environment for analyses. Based on these
results, the first hypothesis is supported. In the next section, this model is
used in an attempt to explain mean clearance rates of the 170 cities.14
Clearance Rate
overall clearance rate model. The fact that the influence is negative seems
logical but somewhat at odds with the previous discussion about suburban
communities. However, these results are theoretically sound.
In his discussion of investigative work, Willmer (1970) indicated that
mobility of the population will have a negative effect on the availability of
information coming from the community. As residents move, the level of
social integration declines. Thus, individuals no longer know their neigh-
bors and do not generally forge close relationships with these strangers.
Likewise, those who are new to the community may be less likely to cooper-
ate with the police, particularly if they have not developed a sense of trust
with regard to the local agency.
The end result of this condition is that lower profile cases (such as most
property offenses) are less likely to be solved. Potential witnesses are less
likely to get involved with such cases, particularly when they do not know
their neighbors or do not consider the crime to be either personally threaten-
ing or serious. This also provides qualified support for the circumstance-
result hypothesis (Eck, 1984), which states that most crimes are solved by
virtue of readily identifiable witnesses rather than investigative effort. I
would qualify that hypothesis to state that routine property crimes are gen-
erally solved because of circumstances present at the time of the first con-
tact with officers rather than follow-up investigations.15 The fact that this
variable is not significant for violent crimes bears out this conclusion.
Because property crimes account for the vast majority of all index offenses,
mobility of the population also has a significant, negative influence on per-
formance in general.
Turbulence may also be a negative factor due to the dramatic increases in
population, resulting in significant shifts (growth) in service demands.
Police departments are generally unable to respond in a timely fashion to
increases in population. Inability to secure qualified applicants, coupled
with the retrenchment and cutbacks of the late 1970s, means that many
departments in the 1980s were unable to keep up with service demands.
Third, the violent crime factor is statistically significant for violent
crimes, producing a slight negative effect on performance. Thus, where a
higher proportion of the crimes are violent, solving violent crimes is ham-
pered. These results appear to be somewhat at odds with the findings of
Cordner (1989), who observed that a higher proportion of property crime
was a negative influence on performance. Cordner’s finding is intuitive
because property crimes are typically solved at a much lower rate, but the
present results suggest a more complex picture.
CONCLUSION
This study has demonstrated that the public sector environment, particu-
larly that of municipal police departments, can be captured with a theoreti-
cally based, empirically supported model. Furthermore, this study has
shown that the environment has a statistically significant and negative influ-
ence on the performance of those police agencies. Several additional com-
ments are important to this discussion.
First, these findings indicate that public agencies are constrained in their
quest to significantly alter their performance. Despite the value placed on
clearance statistics by agencies (and individual officers), environmental
conditions will hamper efforts at performance improvement. Therefore,
managers are encouraged to find the areas where marginal (yet significant)
gains can be made and capitalize on them. As noted above, effective man-
agement of more solvable cases may yield valuable results. This may also
include motivating patrol officers to be as thorough as possible at the initial
stages of the investigation, when the most critical pieces of information are
often most readily available. Procuring cooperation between patrol and
investigative bureaus is (ironically) more difficult than might be suspected.
However, it is an essential key to increasing performance in this vital area.
Second, police managers must continue to recognize the role of the
community in their performance. The philosophical tenets of community-
oriented policing suggest the creation of partnerships with the community
and identification of underlying problems (Manning, 1984; Trojanowicz &
Bucqueroux, 1990). Not only should managers see this as a supplement to
traditional police practices, but they must also recognize that effective part-
nerships are critical to long-term goals. This requires that they become
change agents, assisting the community in problem identification and solu-
tion creation. As this occurs, performance will be positively affected—
regardless of how it is measured.
Because of the nature of community complexity, it is important that
police agencies foster stronger ties with other area law enforcement entities
from all levels of government. Integrating data, networking, creating proj-
ect teams, and focusing on area repeat offenders are examples of this.
Although task forces are often created for narcotics operations and for high-
NOTES
1. Zhao (1996) noted that extreme levels of multicollineary existed between the various
environmental variables. Rather than using a data reduction technique, he chose to conduct
an analysis of variance and compare three categories of organizations.
2. The study cited did not assess the effects of environmental characteristics but focused
on the relationship between clearance data, crime data, and sworn personnel data. Based on
this limited set of explanatory variables, the observed year-to-year variation appears to be
chance variation (a “random walk” as discussed in Pindyck & Rubinfeld, 1991) rather than
shifts due to trending.
3. One might argue for lagged effects and examine clearance rates during the period after
1989. However, appropriate time-series analysis (via Auto Regressive Integrated Moving
Average [ARIMA] or Generalized Least Squares-Auto Regressive Moving Average [GLS-
ARMA]) is best conducted following the disaggregation of data for both independent and
dependent variables. Unfortunately, only one data point was available for some independent
variables, making this impossible. The time frame limitation used here presents the most
straightforward relationship.
4. Of 170 departments, 102 (60%) are located in communities between populations of
10,000 and 25,000.
5. These data were compiled from statistical tables included in the 1993 published data.
They include all agencies submitting uniform crime report data to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation during that year.
6. The term Hispanic refers to origin and may include individuals of any race. Thus, use
of this variable (which is not mutually exclusive) represents a potential problem. However,
the Texas population has a significant Hispanic proportion that must be recognized for this
study.
7. The FBI does monitor the reporting practices of some agencies on a routine basis, as do
the state-level statistical centers that forward data to the FBI.
8. Independent samples t tests revealed no significant differences between the survey
respondents and the larger agency population with regard to clearance rates. Thus, it appears
that there is no performance bias among responding agencies.
9. Bivariate correlational analysis was conducted for all variables used in the factor analy-
sis. This procedure revealed no contradictory or unusual relationships. Due to the large num-
ber of variables considered, a thorough discussion of zero-order correlations may be consid-
ered tedious and would be repetitive of the points made about the factor analysis. Therefore,
zero-order correlational analysis is not presented here.
10. The factor loadings produced scores that tap the absence of resources, which was due
largely to the combined effects of poverty and unemployment. The resulting factor variable
for resources was then recomputed, subtracting the value for each case from zero. The new
variable produced the same values, but it was signed in the opposite direction. This did not
affect the statistical analyses presented in the study; rather, it ensures that the results are prop-
erly interpreted by the reader.
11. For example, responding cities in the border counties of Cameron, El Paso, Hidalgo,
and Webb, Texas had poverty rates of 35%, 28%, 39%, and 36%, respectively. This compares
with a mean of 17.4% for all 170 cities in the sampling frame.
12. Suburban status is defined here as any city within a metropolitan statistical area that is
not designated as a central city by the Census Bureau.
13. Clearly, this is not a discussion of causal relationships and should not be interpreted as
such. Rather, it is a note about an observed correlational pattern.
14. Five cities were dropped from subsequent analysis due to missing data.
15. Eck (1984) presents his own qualification of this hypothesis, which he labels the tri-
age system.
16. Analysis of the residuals’ plot indicated a potential problem with regard to the equal-
ity of variances in the error terms. A replication of the models using weighted least squares
with a power transformation produced similar error terms, coefficients, and overall adjusted
R2 values. The original ordinary least squares models are presented here due to the more
straightforward interpretation of results.
REFERENCES
Allen, D. N., & Maxfield, M. G. (1983). Judging police performance: Views and behavior of
patrol officers. In R. R. Bennett (Ed.), Police at work: Policy issues and analysis (pp. 65-
86). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Allison, J. P. (1972). Economic factors and the rate of crime. Land Economics, 48, 193.
Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brandl, S. G., & Horvath, F. (1991). Crime-victim evaluation of police investigative perfor-
mance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 293-305.
Brown, L. (1992). Violent crime and community involvement. Vital Speeches, 58, 182-184.
Cordner, G. W. (1989). Police agency size and investigative effectiveness. Journal of Crimi-
nal Justice, 17, 145-155.
Crank, J. P. (1990). The influence of environmental and organizational factors on police style
in urban and rural environments. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27,
166-189.
Crank, J. P., & Wells, L. E. (1991). The effects of size and urbanism on structure among Illi-
nois police departments. Justice Quarterly, 8, 169-185.
Culbreth, P. J. (1993). Local government adaptation to a turbulent environment. Doctoral
dissertation, University of La Verne, La Verne, CA.
Danielson, M. N., & Doig, J. (1982). New York: The politics of urban regional development.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Davenport, D. R. (1995). Crime management in Texas: Police personnel, clearance rates
and random walks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political
Science Association, Dallas, TX.
Decker, S. (1979). Allocating police resources and fluctuating crime rates. In D. M. Petersen
(Ed.), Police work (pp. 97-112). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Denhardt, R. (1995). Public administration: An action orientation (2nd ed). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A.M.A. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring environments: A
critique and suggestions. Journal of Management, 17, 701-710.
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.
Eck, J. E. (1984). Solving crimes. Research in Action, NIJ Reports, 184, 4-8.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1994). Uniform crime reports for the United States 1993.
Washington, DC: Author.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1995). Uniform crime reports for the United States 1994.
Washington, DC: Author.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in
community research. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 27-63.
Fried, R. C. (1976). Performance in American bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Gore, A. (1993). Creating a government that works better and costs less: Report of the
National Performance Review. New York: Random House.
Greenwood, P. W. (1970). An analysis of the apprehension activities of the New York City
Police Department. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Greenwood, P. W., Chaiken J. M., & Petersilia, J. (1977). The criminal investigation process.
Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-
disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
Savas, E. S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Schneider, V. W., & Wiersema, B. (1990). Limits and use of the uniform crime reports. In D.
L. MacKenzie, P. J. Baunach, & R.R. Roberg (Eds.), Measuring crime: Large-scale,
long-range efforts (pp. 21-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sessions, W. S. (1990). Police and citizens working together. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin,
59(10), 1.
Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W., Jr. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organiza-
tional environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17,
681-700.
Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Shaw C., & McKay, H. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas (rev. ed.). Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Skogan, W. G. (1976). Efficiency and effectiveness in big-city police departments. Public
Administration Review, 36, 278-286.
Smith, D. A., & Jarjoura, G. R. (1988). Social structure and criminal victimization. Journal
of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 27-52.
Spector, P. E. (1981). Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social
sciences. Research designs (07-023). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Tichy, N. M., & Ulrich, D. O. (1984). The leadership challenge—A call for the
transformational leader. Sloan Management Review, 26, 59-68.
Trojanowicz, R. C., & Bucqueroux, B. (1990). Community policing. Cincinnati, OH: Ander-
son.
Vader, J. E. (1996, August 21). Portland crime rate tumbles. The Oregonian, p. A01.
Waegel, W. B. (1981). Case routinization in investigative police work. Social Problems, 28,
263-275.
Waegel, W. B. (1996). Patterns of police investigation of urban crimes. In G. W. Cordner, L. K.
Gaines, & V. E. Kappelerin (Eds.), Police operations: Analysis and evaluation (pp. 189-
211). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Walker, S. (1994). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A policy guide (3rd ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Weisheit, R. A., Falcone, D. N, & Wells, L. E. (1994). Rural crime and rural policing. Wash-
ington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Weisheit, R. A., Falcone, D. N., & Wells, L. E. (1995). Crime and policing in rural and
small-town America: An overview of the issues. Washington, DC: National Institute of
Justice.
Weiss, M. (1996, July 3). Crime rate drops again. New York Post.
Wellford, C. R. (1974). Crime and the police: A multivariate analysis. Criminology, 12,
195-213.
Willmer, M.A.P. (1970). Crime and information theory. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh
University Press.
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982, March). Broken windows: Police and neighborhood
safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29-38.