Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ICEP Weekly DAWN Deconstrution E-Magazine
ICEP Weekly DAWN Deconstrution E-Magazine
ICEP Weekly DAWN Deconstrution E-Magazine
▪ Essay Writing
▪ Current Affairs
ICEP DAWN DECONSTRUCTION ▪ Pakistan Affairs
SOURCES
DAWN
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
FOREIGN POILCY
THE ECONOMIST
THE DIPLOMAT
GVS, THE NATION
NEW YORK TIMES
The Washington posts
The Wall Street J.
ICEP CSS/PMS INSTITUTE LAHORE
ICEP CSS/PMS Institute Lahore
1 (ICEP Dawn Magazine)
GUIDE FOR READING THIS MAGAZINE
National Articles
1 Gaza- A Sense of Balance Missing 30-32
2 Kazakhstan leading SCO: A Balancing Act 33-36
3 The Crisis in Balochistan 37-39
4 Punjabi in schools 40-42
5 Foreign policy under Trump 2.0 43-46
Current Affairs MCQS
Difficult Words:
Idiomatic Expressions:
1. Demerit - a disadvantage or fault.
2. Exploit - to take advantage of someone or something unfairly. 1. On the lookout for - actively searching for something or
3. Judiciary - the system of courts of law in a country. someone.
4. Fortified - strengthened or protected. 2. Heed this warning - to pay attention to and take action based
5. Multilayered - having many layers or aspects. on a warning or advice.
6. Remorse - deep regret or guilt for a wrong committed. 3. Bullying-victim cycle - a repetitive pattern where individuals
7. Cybersecurity - measures taken to protect computer systems alternate between being bullies and victims.
and online data from unauthorized access or attack. 4. Clear the cyber environment - to make the online space safe
8. Cyber-patrolling - monitoring and regulating online activities and free from harmful content or activities.
to ensure safety and security. 5. Safe navigation - the ability to use the internet or digital
devices safely and responsibly.
Phrases:
1. Illusions - false beliefs or perceptions. 1. Lawfare - the use of legal actions or laws as a weapon or strategy
2. Disenfranchise - to deprive someone of their rights, typically in conflict or political disputes.
the right to vote. 2. Grab votes - to gain electoral support.
3. Blatant - obvious or conspicuous, often in a negative way. 3. Out of its apparent 'benevolence' - seemingly motivated by
4. Gerrymandering - manipulating the boundaries of electoral kindness or goodwill.
districts to favor a particular political party or group. 4. Championing schemes - actively promoting or advocating for
5. Rashtra - a Hindi term meaning nation or country. certain plans or initiatives.
6. Zealots - people who are fanatically committed to a cause. 5. Pushing to the margins - marginalizing or excluding from the
7. Flimsy - lacking solidity or strength, weak or easily damaged. mainstream.
8. Untermensch - a German term meaning "subhuman," used to
refer to a person considered inferior or of lower status. Idiomatic Expressions:
9. Vilification - the act of unfairly portraying someone or
something as evil or abhorrent. 1. Put to rest - to end or resolve something conclusively.
2. Weeks ahead of - a few weeks before.
3. Stand by - to support or remain loyal to.
4. Speak out - to publicly express one's opinions or concerns.
5. Politics of hate and division - strategies or actions that
promote animosity and discord among different groups.
Critical Evaluation
II. Context of the Election and Political Landscape VI. Strategies for the New Government
A. Overview of the controversial February 8 election A. Priority of maintaining a delicate balance between the US and China
B. Political parties' reactions and allegations of rigging B. Focus on deepening relations with each global power without
C. Description of domestic issues and challenges faced by the new upsetting the other
government C. Potential role of Pakistan as a bridge between Washington and
Beijing
III. Foreign Policy Challenges D. Challenges and limitations in achieving diplomatic successes
A. Importance of strategic autonomy for Pakistan
B. Escalating rivalry between the US and China VII. Conclusion
C. Significance of Pakistan's relationship with both global powers A. Recap of the primary foreign policy challenge for the new Sharif
government
IV. Pakistan-US Relations B. Summary of strategies and priorities outlined in the essay
A. Current status of bilateral relationship C. Final thoughts on the complexities of Pakistan's foreign relations
B. Impact of US withdrawal from Afghanistan under the new government
C. Economic and military support from the US
This period of stagnation, however, could be an opportunity for the However, the challenge for Pakistan’s new government lies in avoiding
new Sharif government to prepare for the future, and devise a strategy alignment with China at the expense of its equally important
that would allow the two countries to move their relationship to the relationship with the US. Maintaining a delicate balance between the
next level, find new areas to collaborate and move past the two is imperative for Pakistan’s diplomatic and strategic interests.
transactional state of affairs.
Many in Islamabad contend that Pakistan can still serve as a bridge
All this does not mean Pakistan can afford to neglect its equally between Washington and Beijing. Nonetheless, the deepening strategic
important bilateral relationship with China. rivalry between the US and China makes significant diplomatic
18 (ICEP Dawn Magazine)
successes, like Henry Kissinger’s Pakistan-facilitated secret visit to
Beijing in 1971, much more difficult to achieve. Back then, Pakistan was
successful in convincing the US secretary of state to get on a plane
because Washington needed to stop China from getting closer to the
Soviet camp in an already fraught Cold War environment. Today, in the
eyes of the most important political players in Washington, China
appears to have replaced Russia as the primary threat to the US. Thus,
chances for Pakistan to facilitate a positive reconciliation between the
two global powers, let alone a transformation of relations like the one it
achieved in 1971, are almost nonexistent. Moreover, achieving such a
diplomatic feat would necessitate political and economic stability at
home, which is something the Sharif government definitely does not
have at the moment.
And he had called on then-President But Dzamara has not been as lucky. He has
Robert Mugabe to resign. never returned home to his wife and two young
children.
His forced disappearance was not an
extraordinary event in a country where Every year on the anniversary of his
journalists were (and still are) routinely disappearance, Zimbabweans take to social
harassed and detained by authorities for media to remember him and to vent their
publishing stories deemed to be frustrations about Zimbabwe’s seemingly never-
“politically sensitive” or damaging to ending war on journalists, and truth.
those in positions of power.
Despite efforts by civil society and the main
Sixteen years earlier, in January 1999, two journalists, Mark opposition party, the state appears extremely reluctant to solve
Chavunduka and Ray Choto, who worked for the Standard newspaper, Dzamara’s case and finally deliver justice to his long-suffering family.
were forcibly disappeared for 10 days. While under illegal detention,
they suffered electric shocks to their hands, feet, and genitals and their
This speaks volumes about Harare’s unrelenting contempt for the In Lesotho’s capital Maseru, Ralikonelo “Leqhashasha” Joki, who was a
truth, and war on those who dare to speak truth to power. prominent reporter for Ts’enolo FM radio station, was shot at least 13
times by unknown assailants as he left the studio after a show in May
Whoever disappeared Dzamara clearly intended to instil a great deal of 2023. Joki was highly critical of state officials, and his death appears
fear in media practitioners and kill journalism in the small southern related to his endeavours to expose the truth and hold government
African country. officials accountable for their actions.
To some extent, they have succeeded. It would be amiss to speak of the war on truth tellers without paying
homage to the Palestinian journalists killed in Israel’s war on Gaza. At
As recently as this February, a local paper, the NewsHawks, was forced least 88 Palestinian media workers have been killed as they braved
to abandon its investigations into the Zimbabwe National Army after shelling to expose Israel’s genocidal violence.
subtle threats from senior army officials.
Israel’s war on journalists who expose the injustice of its occupation
Journalists who dare to investigate military and government and its abuse of Palestinians did not begin with this latest war, either.
corruption in Zimbabwe still expect to be harassed, unlawfully Shireen Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American journalist and
arrested, tortured or worse to this day. correspondent for Al Jazeera, was shot dead in May 2022 while
reporting on an Israel raid in the Jenin refugee camp. And Israel had
Regrettably, Zimbabwe is not an outlier. This proclivity to threaten or killed dozens of media workers before her.
kill the messenger to conceal bitter truths appears to be endemic across
Africa and around the globe. I despair at the loss of Abu Akleh, and all the other brave, admirable
Palestinian journalists who had been silenced by Israeli bombs and
Joao Chamusse – a veteran Mozambican journalist, and the co-owner bullets.
and editor of online newspaper Ponto por Ponto – was found dead in
the backyard of his house in KaTembe, Maputo City, on December 14, I mourn for Leqhashasha, Chamusse and all the others who have been
2023. His neighbours said they heard him scream for help before slain for exposing corruption or speaking truth to power.
falling silent.
Words of empathy and condemnation are of course commendable, but In a time where autocrats like Mnangagwa believe they are beyond
what is needed above all is simple: justice. reproach, the truth cannot become a scare commodity.
In the case of Zimbabwe, the African Union and the Southern African Nothing will bring back Leqhashasha, Chamusse or Abu Akleh.
Development Community (SADC) have to stop paying lip service to
press freedom and demand answers from President Emmerson I do not believe Dzamara will ever return home, either.
Mnangagwa. And they should take immediate action to prevent the
repeat of this atrocity.
One can read between the lines what the BJP government actually This Act should be seen as part of the ideological design of the BJP
wants to say. It claimed in a document it issued to explain the objective which has enacted other laws restricting the lives of Muslims like the
of the law that: “Due to the persecution of minorities in those three religious freedom laws, anti-cow slaughter laws, and anti-triple talaq
Muslim countries, the name of Islam was badly tarnished all around law, which put restrictions on Muslims in ways which Hindus would
the world. However, Islam, being a peaceful religion, never preaches or never be. In India, Muslims can be converted, but they cannot convert;
suggests hatred/violence/any persecution on religious grounds. This Muslim men deserting their wives without a process would be jailed
Act, showing compassion and compensation for the persecution, but not Hindus. Muslims cannot have their food choices, but there is no
protects Islam from being tarnished in the name of persecution.” such restriction on Hindus. The CAA is yet another way to legalise
religious inequality and discrimination, mainly against Muslims.
The government claims that CAA seeks to salvage the image of Islam
which is getting tarnished due to persecution of non-Muslims in these Muslims have reasons beyond its ideological or psychological purpose
countries. Even if we ignore the horrible wording of the text, one can to fear this Act. The Home Minister had averred that the CAA should
see that it is nothing but a sinister act of dog-whistling. The followers of not be seen in isolation. It is to be seen along with the creation of a
the BJP often refer to Islam mockingly as a peaceful religion and National Register of Citizens (NRC). The NRC process would identify
Muslims as peaceful people. But if we take this text at its face value, so-called “outsiders” or “infiltrators” and weed them out. He has said
what the CAA does is quite contrary to this claim. It actually says that repeatedly that the NRC would be applied to the entire country. It is
these Muslim-majority countries persecute their minorities. again a dog-whistle executive exercise which tells Hindus that outsiders
– who other than Muslims? – would be deprived of citizenship rights
There is one more thing. Defending the CAA, the leaders of the BJP, through the process of the NRC. At the same time, Hindus were also
including Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself, have been saying assured that those who were left out would be included using the CAA.
that it is also to complete the unfinished business of the partition of They can get citizenship, but not the Muslims.
India in 1947. What could that be? According to them, the creation of
Pakistan implied a complete transfer of population. Which means all
27 (ICEP Dawn Magazine)
The NRC has been implemented in the state of Assam. It was done to
appease the Assamese chauvinists who had been demanding non- There are well-meaning people in India who say that there is no need to
Assamese outsiders to be thrown out. An accord was reached between fear the NRC outside Assam as it has not been announced. So Muslims
them and the government of India after violent agitations. The need not be anxious. But can one take the assertion of the home
government promised that those who have entered Assam after 1971 minister that NRC would be implemented, and implemented in the
would be identified and declared “illegal”. The NRC was that process of entire country, made on the floor of the parliament, lightly?
identifying and excluding the outsiders. The NRC process created
havoc in Assam. Approximately 1.9 million people could not find a It has also been pointed out that the claims by the government to
place in the NRC. But contrary to the claim of the BJP, and the popular provide succour to the persecuted people of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and
perception, more Hindus than Muslims, nearly 1.5 million, got Bangladesh are insincere as those who have entered India after 2014
excluded. are not eligible. This law was enacted in 2019. So does the government
want us to believe that there has been no religious persecution in these
These are mostly Bengali Hindus. The BJP treats them as its natural countries after 2014? But the BJP can always assure its constituents
constituents. It was to allay their fears that the CAA was brought: to say that changes would be brought in the law to correct this anomaly.
that the Hindus thus excluded would get in using the CAA route, but
Muslims would remain out. It also changed the cut-off year. Those who While these questions are legitimate, one cannot underestimate the
have entered till 2014 were eligible to get citizenship through CAA. But larger ideological message of this law: There are two sets of rules in
Muslims cannot use this route, only Hindus can. We can see that India, one for Hindus and one for Muslims, and Hindus will always
persons in similar situations, living in India for decades or even have more rights than Muslims. It is no surprise that Muslims
centuries, but unable to show the required papers, are treated understand it well.
differently by the CAA. Hindus would be allowed to use it to naturalise
themselves as citizens, but Muslims would not be able to do it.
Starting with the premise that sexual violence in war is not uncommon, we all The official response from Hamas gives a very different story: Our Nar-
need to acknowledge that it happens, it’s abhorrent, and must be punished rative… Operation Al Aqsa Flood states that: “Avoiding harm to civilians,
when it occurs. October 7th was no different. If sexual violence occurred, especially children, women, and elderly people is a religious and moral
there is every reason to seek the perpetrators and punish them, but what’s hap- commitment by all the Al-Qassam Brigades’ fighters.” So, there is a direct
pened as a result of that fateful day seems... no, it doesn’t seem, it IS contradiction. So many bodies were found partially clothed that it’s hard to
absolutely out of balance and cannot, in any sense of decency, be accepted as believe nothing of a violent sexual nature happened, but in a conflict, when
a normal response, nor can it, under any definition, be described as self- there are hundreds of people running around shooting at hundreds of others,
defense. and a massive response from the Israeli military was imminently anticipated,
it’s equally as hard to believe fighters took the time to stop, participate in
II. Contextualizing the Incident:
rapes, and then continue their slaughter. Notwithstanding what did or did not
happen on 7th October, we must, at least for the time being, critically review
Both the BBC and CNN, from either side of the Atlantic, report that a UN
our sources. The UN is always a good starting place, and a search on their
Team has concluded that there were most likely rapes on October 7th carried
own website is a good indicator that things in Gaza are not as Israelis, Western
out by Hamas fighters. Hamas, of course, deny the allegations: the BBC
Mainstream media, and many Western politicians would like us to believe.
headline reads: “UN Team says Hamas likely carried out sexual violence in
Israel on October 7th”. But, reading on, the UN team held 33 meetings with Article after article, report after report, the wording is worrying. Examples
Israelis and none with Hamas. The team admitted that not one victim came include: Fear for Gaza; A humanitarian crisis; Catastrophic and
forward. Whether rapes, sexual violence, or mutilation of bodies occurred on unconscionable shameful conditions in Gaza; Lifesaving medical care
that day is vitally important to establish and must eventually be done; collapsing; Babies perishing. I could go on, but the UN messages are clear:
perpetrators must be held responsible, but balance needs to be brought to the Israel is behaving in an inhuman and overly aggressive manner. The
narrative, and the BBC is not very good at doing this. While there was International Court of Justice has described this as a “plausible genocide”. A
undoubtedly violence against innocents and there is circumstantial evidence plausible genocide which could stop today if there was a ceasefire, but the US
that sexual violence took place, there is also “limited evidence” that has told the UN that a ceasefire isn’t needed; what’s needed are sensitive
mutilations occurred, including decapitation or attempts to decapitate. negotiations. The US is the only country that has vetoed a ceasefire; it is
seemingly not interested in cessation despite Joe Biden’s claims last week that
one was imminent. Hamas representatives are currently in Egypt waiting to
31 (ICEP Dawn Deconstruction)
talk about how to achieve this, while Israel’s leaders are in Tel Aviv, having V. Conclusion
decided not to attend the meeting that Joe Biden told us, over ice cream, was
so close to a ceasefire that it would happen as soon as yesterday – it didn’t! Even the US public, normally inured to violence in the Middle East, are
And despite this development, on Saturday, Vice President Harris called on creating a wind of change. But the Administration is not so sensitive to these
Hamas and not on Israel, to agree to an immediate ceasefire. shifting nuances as Kamala Harris and called for Hamas, not Israel, to agree to
an immediate ceasefire as recently as Saturday. The US is correct in one
IV. Addressing Humanitarian Concerns: aspect: “sensitive negotiations” are needed. However, for the reported 71,700
injured people and the families and friends of the 30,410 already dead and
The US is still sending aid, still sending troops to the region, still reporting in thousands missing, those sensitive negotiations can wait – an immediate
all their mainstream media that Hamas is the guilty party, but while this is cessation of the conditions allowing the deaths, injuries, hunger, and thirst of
happening, their citizens are not so convinced. Just over a month ago, public the people who remain in Gaza must surely take priority.
opinion in the US was that over half the population thought Israel had gone
too far. Clearly, this is not a popular war; Every weekend, tens of thousands of
protesters gather and march through cities throughout the USA and other parts
of the world. Their calls for immediate peace are ignored. Aaron Bushnell
became a global talking point: “I’m an active-duty member of the United
States Air Force, and I will no longer be complicit in genocide” was his
message and “Free Palestine” were his final words. Anyone who has seen the
harrowing video of his self-immolation cannot but imagine the physical pain
he endured and the mental anguish that led him to that point. Something many
veterans and service military personnel must also be feeling. Georgetown
University reports the results of polls are moving higher into the “opposing”
camp as time goes on; more and more Americans are in favor of a ceasefire
despite the view that the cause of the current conflict being predominantly
Hamas actions on 7th October.
VI. Conclusion:
II. Analysis of the Intensely Polarized State of the US: V. Implications of Trump's Potential Return for
• Discussion on the political gridlock, government shutdowns, and International Relations:
institutional dysfunction in the US. • Analysis of the potential consequences of Trump's return to office
• Examination of the impact of domestic challenges on for US allies and adversaries.
Washington's international engagement and reliability. • Examination of Trump's transactional view of foreign relations
and its impact on US engagement with the world.
III. Assessment of Trump's Unpredictability and 'America
First' Approach: VI. Assessment of Trump's Domestic Agenda and Its
• Analysis of the disruptive nature of Trump's unilateralist Potential Impact on Foreign Policy:
approach and its effect on US foreign policy during his first term. • Discussion on Trump's domestic priorities, including downsizing
• Evaluation of the challenges posed by Trump's mercurial the 'administrative state' and revamping the deep state.
personality and isolationist tendencies. • Evaluation of the potential repercussions of Trump's domestic
agenda on US foreign policy.
VII. Conclusion:
WHAT will US foreign policy look like under Donald Trump 2.0?
Governments and people across the world have already started
assessing this as the former president appears increasingly likely to
return to power even though the election is far too early to call. But
irrespective of who wins the presidential race, there is a general
perception of the US among the international community that is
informing assessments about Washington’s future engagement with
the world.
He has often bragged he can end the war in 24 hours. There is also Trump’s more ambitious, if not sweeping, plans are on the domestic
strong opposition among Republicans and party supporters to aid for front, which aim to downsize the ‘administrative state’ and revamp the
Ukraine. Trump’s stance on Ukraine has implications for the Taiwan deep state but will also be driven by revenge. That means the American
issue, which he has seldom referred to. Trump has also never said people will have more to fear from Trump’s return than the
America would intervene militarily if China ‘invaded’ Taiwan, as Biden international community.
once declared.