Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scholarly Research Paper - Reagan Todd
Scholarly Research Paper - Reagan Todd
Scholarly Research Paper - Reagan Todd
Reagan Todd
1 March 2024
2
which nurses make decisions based on their knowledge. This knowledge includes items such as
evidence, theories, ways, or patterns of knowing critical thinking, and critical reasoning as stated
in the article, Clinical Judgment Concept Tool Kit (Cantrell, 2022). The nursing process is the
accumulates knowledge and skills over time. These skills contribute to the nurse’s ability to
analyze and synthesize the patient presentation, objective, and subjective data, and then provide
evidence-based nursing interventions to improve patient outcomes (Embler, 2021). For nursing
the process and steps of clinical reasoning. Clinical judgment in nursing students was defined in
stating, that judgment in nursing students is defined as the cognitive process exhibited via a
nursing action by observation, patient assessment, interpreting, and prioritizing data that leads to
a response while using the appropriate nursing practice with the patient (Uppor, 2022). While
students may learn their clinical judgment based on observing experienced nurses' practice, the
best practices for nursing faculty to foster clinical judgment come from things such as safe
and emphasizing the need for preparation. Patient presentations and objective and subjective data
can be presented quickly in the clinical setting. According to the article, Imparting Clinical
Judgment Leading to Sound Clinical Decision-making and Patient Advocacy, the use of case
studies in the didactic setting and engaging simulation or skills lab beyond repetitive
3
demonstrations are two ways to integrate critical analysis into a curriculum. Practicing in these
types of settings allows students a safe environment to discuss what went right and wrong and
more importantly, what went wrong can contribute significantly to student confidence which
My clinical nursing judgment was tested during a complex care clinical in the medical
intensive care unit. The patient assigned was a 66-year-old female who had suffered from a
cardiac arrest. She had a previous history of cardiac arrest, along with diabetes, COPD, and
asthma. After CPR, the first line of treatment was done for this patient, a defibrillator was used,
and she was then put on an assist-control setting ventilator for life-support.
During her plan of treatment, the physicians discovered her kidneys, liver, and brain
were beginning to decline in function. The patient then remained on continuous dialysis (CRRT)
and had a feeding tube placed, a fecal management system, and multiple cardiac drips running,
along with many other medications ordered. According to the article, Initiation of Continuous
Renal Replacement Therapy versus Intermittent Hemodialysis in Critically Ill Patients, a major
advantage of continuous dialysis therapy is the slower rate of solute or fluid removal per unit of
time (Wald, 2023). Thus, it has significant utility in hemodynamically unstable patients who
cannot tolerate conventional intermittent hemodialysis (Wald, 2023). Her fecal management
system was beneficial during the care because it prevented an increased infection in her already
opened sacral wound. During a neurological examination, the patient’s left pupil was fixed and
dilated. It was nonreactive to light, and a corneal reflex test was conducted to see any brain
activity present. My clinical nursing judgment came into place during these assessments because
I had to observe the patient, conduct an assessment, and interpret the data findings. This then
allowed me to prioritize data and discover what needed to be addressed first. The organization
4
and prioritization of the patient findings were established early on with the help of the registered
experiences, critical thinking ability, an extensive knowledge base, and the capacity to integrate
and incorporate evidence-based research into practice they become necessary to assist in any
changing disease patterns, discoveries for treatment, and the aging populations, both in the
patients and nurses, hence why clinical judgment is an evolution. It is an essential portion of the
practice to learn from the experience because it will help us gain our nursing judgment and
provide quality patient care and outcomes. Nurses who are more specialized in their setting tend
to use a more holistic approach to making decisions compared to less experienced nurses who
upon the healthcare provider’s ability to reason, think, and make judgments about the care.
Novice nurses are challenged with overcoming a knowledge gap, leading to less effective
decisions and actions compared to experienced nurses who are challenged with traditional
intuition and evidence-based thinking to make effective clinical decisions. All things considered;
clinical nursing judgment differs between the nurse’s experience, their level of thinking, and the
practice they had away from differing clinical settings. It is vital to practice this judgment away
from patients as well as on patients due to the risk of making mistakes, which is why students
benefit from simulation experiences and debriefing. The best practices nurses can utilize in
clinical judgment are those involving assessment, observation, interpretation, and decision-
making, which can all be practiced in a variety of settings on a diverse patient population.
5
References
Cantrell, M. (2022) Clinical Judgment Concept Tool Kit. American Association of Colleges of
https://www.aacnnursing.org/essentials/database/kit/i/c_cj_wg_xls
Embler, P. (2021). Imparting Clinical Judgment Leading to Sound Clinical Decision-making and
https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/imparting-clinical-judgement
Maffucci, J., Vaderzwan, K., Burt, L. (2023). Evaluating a Shared Reflective Practice to Develop
Nursing Student Clinical Judgment. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Nurse Educator.
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.eps.cc.ysu.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=9b57edf6-
b765-4c08-8d1c fbc8dc9b1c3a
%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHVpZCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2Nvc
GU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=38108376&db=cmedm
Uppor, W., Klunkin, A., Viseskul, N. (2022). A Concept Analysis of Clinical Judgment in
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.eps.cc.ysu.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=8358abec-
0c9c-4003-9873 55bb0a555b5c
%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHVpZCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2Nvc
GU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=35671387&db=cmedm
Wald, R., Gaudry, S., Adhikari, NKJ. (2023). Initiation of Continuous Renal Replacement
Therapy Versus Intermittent Hemodialysis in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Acute
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.eps.cc.ysu.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=d836df58-
dec0-43a5-95bc-9567fd57c61e
%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHVpZCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2Nvc
GU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=37815560&db=cmedm