Professional Documents
Culture Documents
USA Understanding AI Bill of Rights USA
USA Understanding AI Bill of Rights USA
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Kay Firth-Butterfield
Head of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; Member of the Executive
Committee, World Economic Forum
Karen Silverman
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, The Cantellus Group
Benjamin Larsen
Project Lead, World Economic Forum
A new AI Bill of Rights, released in the US last week outlines five key protections.
Many feel the document is a critical starting point but wish more checks and
balances existed to keep AI accountable.
Last week, the US White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP) released a “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights” along with several
related agency actions. The document provides an important framework
for how government, technology companies, and citizens can work
together to ensure more accountable AI.
Here's what's key to understand about the new guidelines - both what they
:
Here's what's key to understand about the new guidelines - both what they
cover, what they don't and what other work is being done in for AI
accountability.
DISCOVER
Show more
Since 2018 the European Union has been leading steps to advance the
design, development and deployment of AI in its region whilst seeking to
protect its citizens from misuse. The EU AI Act, due in 2024, will be the
culmination of that work. There has been much discussion about how the
USA would respond to this new legislative framework. Likewise, China has
been developing its own regulatory regime for the use of AI. Whilst much
has been written about the AI Arms Race and technological decoupling
between the US and China, the underlying question is whether this is the
beginning of path-departing technological regimes and governance
mechanisms internationally. The EU-US Trade and Technology Council
points to new efforts aimed at ensuring greater alignment across the
:
points to new efforts aimed at ensuring greater alignment across the
Atlantic, while the focus of the EU and China on greater regulation of
algorithms, suggests that the US is lagging behind in terms of rule-setting
for the digital economy. There are also a number of international efforts to
set out best practices in the use of AI. For example the Global Partnership
on AI was formed in 2020 and includes both the EU and the USA. UNESCO
and the OECD have also set principles for proper use of AI and at the World
Economic Forum we have been creating scaleable and accessible
frameworks for good governance of AI by governments and business since
2017.
Safe and Effective Systems: You should be protected from unsafe or ineffective
systems.
Algorithmic Discrimination Protections: You should not face discrimination by
algorithms and systems should be used and designed in an equitable way.
Data Privacy: You should be protected from abusive data practices via built-in
protections and you should have agency over how data about you is used.
Notice and Explanation: You should know that an automated system is being
used and understand how and why it contributes to outcomes that impact you.
Alternative Options: You should be able to opt out, where appropriate, and have
access to a person who can quickly consider and remedy problems you
encounter.
The intent of the blueprint is to “help guide the design, use, and
deployment of automated systems to protect the American Public.” The
principles are non-regulatory and non-binding: a "Blueprint," as advertised,
and not yet an enforceable “Bill of Rights” with the legislative protections.
The Blueprint is 76 pages and includes many examples of AI use cases that
the White House OSTP considers problematic. Importantly, the document
clarifies that the Blueprint should only apply to automated systems that
have the potential to meaningfully impact the American public’s rights,
opportunities, or access to critical resources or services, generally
excluding many industrial and/or operational applications of AI. The
Blueprint expands on examples for use of AI in Lending, Human Resources,
surveillance and other areas (which would also find a counterpart in the
‘high-risk’ use case framework of the forthcoming EU AI Act).
On the other hand, there is a great amount of support for not moving to
regulation in order to allow beneficial innovation and competition in the
many uses of AI, to flourish. Policy experts have also highlighted the
important protections this document could have for a range of groups
including Black and Latino Americans. As the head of the nonprofit Center
for AI and Digital Policy noted in MIT Technology Review, the Bill of Rights
is key starting point, and an "impressive" one at that.
Resources and by Law Enforcement. Last year, the Forum released this
:
Resources and by Law Enforcement. Last year, the Forum released this
practical toolkit to promote the responsible use of artificial intelligence-
based tools in human resources. In addition, a framework developed last
fall provides critical guidance for facial recognition use in law
enforcement.
Stay up to date:
:
Artificial Intelligence
Follow
Related topics:
Share:
:
THE BIG PICTURE
Subscribe
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails.
For more details, review our privacy policy.
ABOUT US
Our Mission
Our Impact
Leadership and Governance
Our Partners
Sustainability
History
Careers
Contact Us
:
EVENTS
Events
Open Forum
MEDIA
Press
Strategic Intelligence
UpLink
Global Shapers
Sign in
Join us
L ANGUAGE EDITIONS
English
:
Español
中⽂
⽇本語