Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ventilation in Industrial Environments 1
Ventilation in Industrial Environments 1
Ventilation in Industrial Environments 1
Localized
Ventilation Systems
Roof Ventilators
Roof ventilators serve as heat escape ports in buildings, and proper enclosure is essential for
weatherproofing. Various types of ventilator designs are available, each with its own advantages
and limitations. Continuous ventilation monitors are highly effective in removing substantial heat
loads, with streamlined continuous ventilators being efficient and weathertight options.
Gravity ventilators, while effective and cost-efficient, should primarily be used for heat control
rather than for controlling gaseous or aerosol contaminants. Careful attention to positive pressure
at the ventilators is necessary to prevent outside air from entering.
Energy Conservation, Recovery, and Sustainability
Energy conservation and recovery should be prioritized in industrial plants to minimize energy
consumption while ensuring life safety. Incorporating energy recovery into preliminary planning
can lead to substantial savings, provided it does not compromise safety requirements. Various
methods, including insulation of equipment, optimal operation of ventilation systems, and use of
energy recovery equipment, can contribute to energy conservation.
For instance, process and equipment insulation, along with heat shields, can minimize heat loads,
while air-to-air heat exchangers can recover building or process heat. System operation should be
optimized to balance energy savings with life safety requirements, with consideration given to
factors such as CO2-based demand control ventilation and recirculation systems for makeup air.
Monitoring and maintenance are essential for ensuring the effectiveness of energy recovery
systems while complying with safety regulations and standards.
Air Movement In The Vicinity Of Local Exhaust The air movement in front of a local exhaust
hood is influenced by various factors including the rate of exhaust airflow, the design of the
hood, its distance from surrounding surfaces, and the geometry of the hood itself. Figure 5
illustrates the velocity contours for an unflanged round duct hood. Studies have demonstrated
that velocity contours, expressed as a percentage of the hood entrance velocity, are similar for
hoods with similar geometry. Figure 6 depicts velocity contours for a rectangular hood with an
aspect ratio of 0.333, showcasing profiles resembling those of the round hood but more
elongated. When the aspect ratio drops below approximately 0.2 (0.15 for flanged openings), the
airflow pattern in front of the hood shifts from approximately spherical to cylindrical. Velocity
diminishes swiftly with distance from the hood; according to Dalla-Valle, the velocity reduction
follows an inverse square law concerning the distance from the suction inlet.
Fig. 5 Velocity Contours for Plain Round Opening Fig. 6 Velocity Contours for Plain
Rectangular Opening
Designers should account for side drafts and other air movements near the capture area of a local
exhaust hood. Studies by Caplan and Knutson found that air movements in front of laboratory
hoods could lead to the escape of contaminants into the breathing zone of operators. In industrial
settings, it's common to observe large fans blowing air onto workers situated in front of an
exhaust hood. However, this practice can render the local exhaust hood ineffective, failing to
provide adequate protection for the worker and their nearby colleagues.
Pressure Loss in Hoods and Ducts A vena contracta forms at the entrance of the hood or duct,
causing a pressure loss, quantified using the pressure loss coefficient Co or a static pressure entry
loss (ACGIH 2013). As air enters a hood, it incurs a pressure loss, known as hood entry loss,
which may comprise various components depending on the complexity of the hood. Simple
hoods typically have a single pressure loss coefficient CL, defined as the static pressure divided
by the velocity pressure. Thus, the static pressure equals the negative of the velocity pressure.
The static pressure in the hood or duct includes the static pressure (velocity pressure) plus the
head loss, expressed as a fraction of the velocity pressure. The loss coefficient CL is distinct
from the hood entry loss coefficient Co, which relates to duct total pressure loss and duct
velocity pressure. Bernoulli's equation suggests that hood total pressure approaches zero at the
hood entrance, resulting in a static pressure increase within the hood duct due to the velocity
pressure.
Loss coefficients for various hood shapes are provided in Figure 7. For tapered hoods, an
optimum hood entry angle of 45° minimizes entry loss, but practical limitations may necessitate
a 90° angle, typical for many tapered hoods with rectangular openings.
Example 1 illustrates the calculation of suction pressure for a nonenclosing side-draft flanged
hood. The suction pressure in this scenario incorporates both losses occurring at the slot and duct
entry locations.
For compound hoods like multislot hoods, losses must be analyzed differently. The slots
distribute air over the hood face without affecting capture efficiency. Slot velocity typically
should be around 2000 fpm, with plenum velocities typically at 50% of slot velocities to achieve
proper distribution at minimal energy cost.
More detailed information on loss factors and exhaust ductwork design can be found in Chapter
21 of the 2017 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals, ACGIH (2013), and Brooks (2001).
Other Components Of Local Exhaust Systems
Duct Design and Construction The duct, the second component of a local exhaust system,
transports contaminated air from the hood(s). Round ducts are preferred for their uniform
velocity distribution and ability to withstand higher static pressures. Rectangular or flat oval
ducts are used when design constraints necessitate, with the aspect ratio ideally close to unity.
Minimum transport velocity refers to the velocity required to transport particles without settling,
varying based on the nature of contaminants. Table 2 provides some accepted transport velocities
for different types of contaminants. Design velocities can exceed minimum transport velocities
but should never fall significantly below.