Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transcript Samp
Transcript Samp
May you please send us your post-intervention admin/teacher survey with either
updated survey variable names or filling in the legend of questions with your current
variable names. It is attached in this email for your convenience.
Northwestern appreciates all your hard work with survey collection, and we would like to
use all your data since you collected it from so many participants.
We would also like your interview data (transcripts, or at least key findings/quotes) from
participants since we also analyze qualitative data, and your January report (to track
progress on this project).
Final report
Please provide the list of references you refer to in the report.
Provide some details on the survey sample, such as how you recruited them and which
geographies they're from. Do they represent the people that are normally served by the
Special Olympics Rwanda, both geographically and in other characteristics?
Data
We had some trouble linking your variable names from the teacher/admin file with the legend.
Could you fill out the attached excel sheet with the column for your variables so we can link
them? We're also attaching the cleaned data for your reference.
Please provide data on how many times students participated in the activities. This would have
been collected from parents.
Provide the approximate date range that the pre and post data were collected.
We would greatly appreciate it if you could address the above comments for the final report and data.
Record exactly what is said, by whom, plus some indication of tone, pauses, body language, etc,
if necessary. Remember that one hour of recording can take 6-10 hours of transcription time.
Transcribing
Editing
If necessary, you can edit the quotations. However, you need to make sure that you do not
misrepresent the meaning. There are also certain conventions that you need to follow (Richards
& Morse, 2007, pp. 208-209):
Avoid misrepresenting what was said, and indicate where text has been removed - with
ellipses (...) - and where you have substituted words - by enclosing them in square
brackets ([..]).
Delete any quoted material that is redundant. Ask yourself if each phrase is necessary. A
briefer quotation may be more powerful and much more relevant to your argument. If
you think the participant is implying something, suggest this in your interpretive
commentary.
You may also edit minor linguistic inaccuracies to facilitate reading, but if you decide to do so,
you should note this clearly at the first occurrence or in the method section (Dornyei, 2007, p.
297).
Be Careful!
Transcription: I think unless we want to become like other countries, where people have, you
know, democratic freedom.
Actual Words: I think unless we want to become like other countries, where people have no
democratic freedom.
Anonymity
Ethics codes prohibit researchers from disclosing personally identifying information about
participants.
OR
Identify participants with letters (Participant A, Manager B), pseudonyms (Peter, Jenny), or by
role (Doctor, Patient, Customer).
The quotations are used to illustrate your research findings, and they need an introduction from
you which tells your reader how they illustrate that finding. So you need to:
Say what the finding is
Introduce the quotation by saying who said it and in what context
Give the quotation
Comment on the quotation by comparing it to other quotations from the same person,
other quotations from different people on the same topic, etc.
There are two main ways of presenting data to illustrate your analysis.
1. The first is to present your interpretation of findings and then follow with a quotation to
illustrate your description. This gives the reader the information to judge whether or not
your interpretation represents the data.
2. Alternatively, you may present a quotation followed by your interpretation. This may
show your ability to analyse in fine detail, but it could miss the overall picture.
3. Or, of course, a mixture of the two.
Although you don’t need to include all your primary data, you should make it available in an
appendix, to which you should refer when necessary. For example:
Details of all the interview participants can be found in Appendix A, with transcripts of each
interview in Appendix B.
Appendices
Put here any data that was too extensive to incorporate earlier. In the text, for example, you
might have included the tables / graphs that give the results of your analyses. In the appendices,
you can give the raw data/transcripts to enable the reader to make their own analysis; plus
lengthy transcripts of interviews or texts, questionnaires, interview guides, texts, ethocs forms,
and so on.
Always attempt to contextualise quotations (Where did she say this? Who else was present?
What question was she answering? What did she say before this? How does it relate to your
overall argument?).
Make sure there is a good balance between your participants' quotations and your interpretation
of the words.
An overemphasis on the researcher's interpretations at the cost of participant quotes will leave
the reader in doubt as to just where the interpretations came from; an excess of quotes will cause
the reader to become lost in the morass of stories (Morrow, 2005, p. 256).
Paraphrase or summarise
When you have added the interviews to the appendix, you can then paraphrase or summarise
them in your report. Paraphrase is done as follows:
APA Style
When quoting research participants, use the same formatting as for other quotations: Present a
quotation of fewer than 40 words in quotation marks within the text ..., and present a quotation of
40 words or more in a block quotation .... Because quotations from research participants are part
of your original research, do not include them in the reference list or treat them as personal
communications; state in the text that the quotations are from participants.
Participant" Julia," a 32-year-old woman from Kigali, described her experiences as a new mother
as "simultaneously the best and hardest time of my life." Several other participants agreed,
describing the beginning of parenthood as "joyful," "lonely," and "intense." Julia and the other
participants completed interviews in their homes.
Examples
Campbell (1997) refers to an angle as a "perspective that dominates a story". In our study,
research and writing was reported as always being guided by an angle. It was described as a
"thrust" or "driving force" of an assignment - the new "twist" or "hook" that directs the story. An
angle was also described as a proposition or statement. In the following extract one journalist
relates this idea to the tragic events of the 11 September.
To start off with, there was the straight reporting of facts: a plane has hit the World Trade Center,
then a second plane has hit the WTC ... The default angle is "what has happened" ... (QC).
Most notably though, an angle was often presented as a hypothesis or conjecture about something
suspected of being the case, and this is one sense in which it can be understood as motivating
subsequent information seeking. QC continued:
But this soon develops, the new "angle" comes into play. I remember on the day that by the time
of the second plane, I and others were saying "This must be an act of terrorism, bemuse this is not
coincidental, an accident ...". So had I been writing the story, I would have begun building up
information to support my hypothesis that the acts of September 11 were terrorism. The standard
journalistic questions of who, what, why, when, how would have been asked about the events
against the backdrop of my hypothesis of terrorism.
And he summarises:
Essentially there is an angle to all news and features; it is really a working hypothesis that
translates the gathered facts, which may include some speculation, into a coherent account (QC).
(Attfield, S. & Dowell, J. (2003). Information seeking and use by newspaper journalists. Journal
of Documentation, 59(2), 87-204.)