Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING:

NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses


Vol 17, No 2 April 2002

EDITORIAL

Surgeon General’s Report on Health Care Needs


for Individuals with Mental Retardation

R ECENTLY, THE SURGEON GENERAL


convened a national forum composed of in-
terdisciplinary experts, consumers, and advocates
ment for services, growing numbers of children
reliant on the publicly funded Medicaid program,
and the cumbersome system of care that is a chal-
to address the health care needs of children, youth, lenge for families to navigate (Schultz, Liptak, and
and adults with mental retardation (MR). The Kirch, 1998; Smull & Bellamy, 1991; United
groundbreaking event resulted in the development States General Accounting Office, 1998; USPHS,
of a national agenda, entitled “Closing the Gap: A 2001). Other barriers include inadequate attention
National Blueprint to Improve the Health of Per- to primary care needs, delays in early identification
sons with Mental Retardation,” with the goal of of health problems resulting in more serious prob-
improving the level of health care services pro- lems and complications, communication barriers
vided to children, youth, and adults with MR. This encountered with health care providers, limited
report is an important document for all health care amounts of program materials and communication
professionals, including pediatric nurses who pro- in threshold languages, and inconsistent applica-
vide health care services to infants, children, and tion of best treatment practices. The widespread
youth with MR. Surgeon General David Satcher, problems associated with meeting the health care
MD, convened this national forum based on the needs of individuals with MR are exacerbated by
recognition that the health care needs of this pop- significant societal changes such as increased life
ulation are great as he noted, “It became apparent expectancy and the changes in the public service
that as our system of care for those with mental programs that emphasize more community-ori-
retardation evolved, our attention to their health ented services and approaches (Batshaw, 1997;
lessened” (US Public Health Service [USPHS], Sawyer, Collins, Bryan, Brown, Hope, & Bowes,
2001, p. v). This report emphasizes six major 1998; Schauffler & McMenamin, 1999; Senate Se-
themes: enhance emphasis on wellness and health lect Committee on Developmental Disabilities and
promotion; increase the knowledge and under- Mental Health, 1998, Presidential Task Force on
standing of health and MR; improve the quality of Employment of Adults with Disabilities, 1998).
health care provided; educate health care profes- This report has significant implications for pe-
sionals on providing care to individuals with MR; diatric nurses who are clinicians, educators, re-
improve systems of health care financing; and im- searchers, administrators, and policymakers. This
prove the access to health care services. is the time for all pediatric nursing stakeholders to
The barriers to accessing health care for children access, read, and respond to this new national
and youth with MR have been well-documented.
Some of the barriers related to the health care Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
system itself include lack of competent profession- 0882-5963/02/1702-0001$35.00/0
als willing to provide care, insufficient reimburse- doi:10.1053/jpdn.2002.125450

Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Vol 17, No 2 (April), 2002 79


80 SURGEON GENERAL’S REPORT

agenda for individuals, including children and 5. Increase the number of investigators trained in
youth with MR and their families. The full report can health and MR research.
be accessed online at http://www.surgeongeneral. 6. Enhance the visibility of health and MR re-
gov. search.

GOALS AND ACTION STEPS TO IMPROVE


THE HEALTH OF PERSONS WITH MR Goal 3: Improve the Quality of Health
Care for People with Mental Retardation
Goal 1: Integrate Health Promotion into
Community Environments of People with Action Steps:
Mental Retardation 1. Identify priority areas of health care quality
improvement for persons with MR.
Action Steps: 2. Identify, adapt, and develop standards of care
1. Educate and support individuals with MR, their for use in monitoring and improving the quality
families, and other caregivers in self-care and of care for individuals with MR.
wellness. 3. Ensure that the practice, organization, and fi-
2. Develop and implement strategies for reducing nancing of health care services for individuals
care burdens for families of individuals with with MR promote improvement in their quality
MR and reducing high rates of turnover in non-
of care
family caregivers.
4. Establish local, regional, and national awards
3. Protect the health of individuals with MR from
that recognize excellence in providing health
occupational hazards.
care to individuals with MR.

Goal 2: Increase Knowledge and


Understanding of Health and Mental Goal 4: Train Health Care Providers in the
Retardation, Ensuring that Knowledge is Care of Adults and Children with Mental
Made Practical and Easy to Use Retardation
Action Steps: Action Steps:
1. Enable individuals with MR, their families, and 1. Integrate didactic and clinical training in health
their health care providers to partner with pro- care of individuals with MR into the basic and
fessional investigators in identifying health re- specialized education and training of all health
search priorities and in designing and imple- care providers.
menting research relating to health and MR. 2. Support development and dissemination of ef-
2. Develop a national research agenda that identi- fective training modules in interdisciplinary
fies gaps in existing scientific knowledge re- practice. Design modules to include social
lated to health and MR including methodologic workers, family members, individuals with MR,
challenges, priorities, feasibility, and timetables and others, when relevant, such as teachers,
for achieving priority research. personal care attendants, job counselors, and
3. Collect data on the health status of persons with front-line office staff.
MR in relation to the utilization, organization, 3. Develop methods of evaluating and improving
and financing of the health services. health provider competence in the health care of
4. Review current ethical and legal protection of individuals with MR. These methods should be
human research subjects as they relate to indi- based on appropriate standards of care, includ-
viduals with MR. Revise these rules as neces- ing care that reflects understanding and respect
sary to facilitate the participation of person with for diverse cultures, and should be used to eval-
MR in clinical trails and other types of research, uate the competence of students and practicing
with full protection of their autonomy, health, providers and to provide feedback and reevalu-
and safety. Ensure that individuals, their fami- ation of their performance.
lies, their health care providers, and their advo- 4. Develop, evaluate, and disseminate continuing
cates participate as partners in reviews and re- education curricula for health care providers at
visions of these rules. Ensure their participation all levels of practice in the care of individuals
in Institutional Review Board reviews of re- with MR. Such curricula should be based on
search proposals related to MR. appropriate standards of care and include train-
SURGEON GENERAL’S REPORT 81

ing opportunities that reflect understanding and Goal 6: Increase Source of Health Care
respect for diverse cultures. Services for Adults, Adolescents, and
Children with Mental Retardation, Ensuring
that Health Care is Easily Accessible for
Them
Action Steps
1. Increase the number of physicians, dentists,
Goal 5: Ensure that Health Care Financing clinical psychologists, and allied health care
Produces Good Health Outcomes for Adults professionals who have appropriate training and
and Children with Mental Retardation experience in treating adults, adolescents, and
children with MR, including those from socio-
Action Steps: economically and linguistically diverse com-
1. Determine relationships among diverse financ- munities.
ing mechanisms, service packages, and health 2. Make access to health care services less com-
outcomes for individuals with MR. Use findings plicated for individuals with MR and their fam-
to ensure accountability of flexible arrange- ilies and caregivers, whether in urban, rural, or
ments for financing services. remote communities.
2. Use appropriate definitions of “effective,” 3. Integrate health care services for individuals
“cost-effective,” and “health outcomes” in re- with MR into diverse community programs.
search, organization, and financing of health 4. Expand the types of health professionals used in
care for individuals with MR. providing health care to individuals with MR,
3. Identify a package of health care services for including geriatric, pediatric, and other nurse
individuals with MR that will produce good practitioners and nurses, physicians assistants,
outcomes in terms of health maintenance, man- dental hygienists, and behavioral therapists.
agement of illness, functionality, and life goals 5. Support supplementary services to help physi-
across the individual’s lifespan. cians, dentists, psychologists and other provid-
4. Evaluate models for leveraging health dollars to ers, and organized health services in providing
care to individuals with MR.
maximize purchasing power by and for individ-
6. Ensure that adaptive equipment and assistive
uals with MR. Ensure that individuals’ cover-
technologies are available in urban, rural, and
age and access to primary and specialty health
remote communities for use at clinical sites
care and support services are not eroded by
where individuals with MR receive health care.
revisions in purchasing practices and policies. 7. Ensure continuity of health care service through
5. Explore strategies to offset financial costs to the life of an individual with MR.
providers and health services programs that are
associated with meeting specialized needs of Cecily Lynn Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN
patients with MR. Editor

REFERENCES
Batshaw, M. (1997). Children with Disabilities, ed 4. Balti- Sawyer, S., Collins, N., Bryan, D., Brown, D., Hope, M., &
more, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Bowes, G. (1998). Young people with spina bifida: Transfer
Schultz A., Liptak, G., & Kirch, A. (1998). Helping adoles- from paediatric to adult health care. Journal of Paediatrics &
cents who have disabilities negotiate transitions to adulthood. Child Health, 34, 414-417.
Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 21, 187-201. Schauffler, H., & McMenamin, S. (1999). Baseline: 1997: A
Senate Select Committee on Developmental Disabilities and survey of Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans in County Organized
Mental Health. (1998). Improving the Quality of Community- Health System and Two-Plan Counties. Sacramento, CA: Medi-
Based Services and Supports in California for Persons with Cal Policy Institute.
Developmental Disabilities. Sacramento, CA: Author. United States General Accounting Office (1998). Social Se-
Smull, M., & Bellamy, G. (1991). Community services for
curity Disability Insurance: Multiple factors affect beneficia-
adults with disabilities: Policy challenges in the emerging sup-
ries’ ability to return to work. (GAO/HEHS-98-39, January).
port paradigm In L. Meyer, C. Peck, & L. Broun (Eds.), Critical
Issues in the Lives of People with Severe Disabilities (pp. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
527-548). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. U.S. Public Health Service. (2001). Closing the Gap: A
Presidential Task Force on Employment of Adults with Dis- National Blueprint for Improving the Health of Individuals with
abilities (1998). A Report of the Presidential Task Force on Mental Retardation. Report of the Surgeon General’s Confer-
Employment of Adults with Disabilities. Washington, DC: Au- ence on Health Disparities and Mental Retardation. Washing-
thor. ton, DC: US Government Printing Office.

You might also like