INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION, AND IMMERSION

Grade, Strand, and Section: __________________________________________ Group No.:

________
Researchers (Surname only, alphabetically arranged): ________________________________________________________________________________

RESEARCH PROPOSAL RUBRICS

Directions: Evaluate the research paper according to the given criteria. Check the appropriate column (5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest) that indicates
the evaluation.

Indicators: 5 – Approved with Commendation 4 – Approved 3 – Minor Revision 2 – Major Revision 1 - Rejected

INTRODUCTION
Rating Scale
Criteria
5 4 3 2 1
1. The introduction consists of an adequate discussion of the problem, its significance, scope, and necessary concepts and
terms related to the study.

Weight: 2
2. The in-text citations are correct and clearly presented in the introduction and literature review. The number, format, and
content of in-text citations align with the references.
3. The cited literature and studies are adequate, accurate, and relevant to the study.
4. Related literature and studies are recent (five to six years ago to the present year of the study).
5. The framework is correct and supports the main problem or study.
6. The framework presented adequately conceptualizes all the concepts of the theory appropriately.
7. The gap in knowledge of the study is stated specifically and clearly.
8. The aim, purpose, or objective was thoroughly presented.
9. The synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, well-written, concise (not too long nor too short),
and based on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
10. In general, the manuscript is scholarly and has a global impact in educational and other significant contexts as a whole.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

Rating Scale
Criteria
5 4 3 2 1
1. The research methodology is well explained and suitable for or fits the research problem.
2. The research design employed is correct and relevant to the fulfillment of the accurate results of the study.
3. The participants of the study are enough for the study and well-explained in terms of the sample profile, sample size,
and sampling technique and/or procedure.
4. The research tools and/or instruments are presented and discussed in terms of their content, validity, reliability,
function, and suitability for the study (in the case of a self-made instrument).
5. The data gathering procedure and/or techniques are explained in complete detail, beginning from the time the
researchers applied ethical considerations and sought permission to conduct the study.
6. The data analysis procedure is elucidated, including coding methods and statistical analysis if appropriate.

MECHANICS
Rating Scale
Criteria
5 4 3 2 1
1. The research paper is free from writing errors (grammar, language use, capitalization, spelling, punctuation,
abbreviation, and contraction).

Weight: 2

PUNCTUALITY
Rating Scale
Criteria
5 4 3 2 1
1. The research paper is submitted on or before the deadline.
Total Score: /100

COMMENTS/REMARKS: