TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

Quezon City
ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9 (AR501)

Architectural Capstone Design Project Proposal (Design Based Project)
DRAFT CHAPTER 01
PROPONENT:

PROJECT TITLE:
PROJECT LOCATION: CAPSTONE ADVISER:

NO VERY TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION POOR LESS SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXCELLENT SCORE SCORE
SUBMISSION SATISFACTORY
The proponent was able
The proponent was not The proponent was The content exceeds
The The provided to funnel the topic from
able to clearly funnel the able to clearly funnel the project
proponent did content is global or national
topic from global or the topic from global or requirements and
not submit significantly perspective to the specific
The Project national perspective to national perspective to demonstrates
1A any content lacking in issue that the study
the specific issue that the specific issue that exceptional
related to the
quality, depth, intends to address but
the study intends to the study intends to understanding and
project. or relevance. there are gaps in
address. address execution.
discussion
10 0 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts SCORE X 2

The proponent was not The proponent was able

The proponent was
The The statement able to clearly identify to clearly identify the
able to clearly identify The statement of the
proponent did of the problem the perceived needs that perceived needs that the
the perceived needs problem is well-defined,
Statement of not submit is unclear, the study intends to study intends to address
that the study intends clear, and effectively
1B the Problem any statement insufficient, or address and/or all but majority of problems
to address through sets the context for the
of the lacks problems stated cannot stated cannot be
architectural project.
problem. coherence. be addressed through addressed through
intervention
architectural intervention architectural intervention
35 0 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts SCORE X 7
 The project
The project goals and
The goals and
The project goals and The project goals and The project goals and objectives are
proponent did objectives are
Project Goals objectives are aligned objectives are aligned objectives are specific well-crafted, specific,
not submit unclear, vague,
and with the problem with the problem and aligned with the measurable,
1C any project or not aligned
Objectives statement but most are statement but some are problem statement and achievable, relevant,
goals and with the
unclear and vague. are unclear and vague. study. and time-bound
objectives. problem
(SMART).
statement.
20 0 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts SCORE X 4

The information about

The
the client is
proponent did The provided The provided The provided information The provided
well-researched,
not submit information information about the about the client is information about the
insightful, and
The Client any about the client client is insufficient or sufficient, accurate, or client is sufficient,
1D demonstrates a deep
information is unrelated to inaccurate and needs related to the project but accurate, or related to
understanding of their
about the the project. further verification. not consistent. the project
needs and
client.
expectations.
10 0 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts SCORE X 2

The project The proponent was not The proponent was The project scope and
The proponent was able
The scope and able to clearly explain able to clearly explain limitations are
to clearly explain the
proponent did limitations are the extent of the study, the extent of the study, well-crafted,
Project Scope extent of the study, but
not submit unclear, making the distinction of completely removing comprehensive, and
and there is still ambiguity on
1E any project insufficient, or topics/items/issues that any ambiguity on what effectively outline the
Limitations what topics/items/issues
scope and not aligned with are included and not topics/items/issues are boundaries and
are included and not
limitations. the project included very vague and included and not constraints of the
included.
goals. ambiguous included project.
15 0 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts SCORE X 3

The paper lacks relevant The paper presents The paper presents The paper presents
The The paper data/information. It does relevant data information complete and relevant compehensive
Overall
proponent did contents are not not complies with the but needs verification and data information. It complete and relevant
Cohesiveness
1F not submit cohesive and prescribed format and further study. It somehow fully complies with the data information. It fully
of Chapter 1
any related to aligned to each does not presents a complies with the prescribed format and complies with the
study. other. logical flow of prescribed format and presents a logical flow prescribed format and
discussion. somehow presents a of discussion. presents a logical flow
 logical flow of discussion. of discussion.
10 0 1 pt 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts 5 pts SCORE X 2

Total Score (out of 30): PTS

Total Percentage Score: %

Remarks, Comments and Recommendations:

Evaluated by:
Date:

Signature over Printer Name