Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GIST Sociology
GIST Sociology
GIST Sociology
MEANING OF DIVERSITY
- The term diversity refers to differences rather than inequalities.
- India is a land of diversities where different communities identified by various cultural
markers such as language, religion, race or caste etc coexist with each other.
- These communities might prove to be threat to the integrity of the nation if these
communities are competitive and hostile with one another.
- People are emotional about cultural identities and they arouse intense passions
among individuals.
- These identities can politically mobilise large numbers of people.
- Cultural differences are accompanied by economic and social inequalities.
- The government’s initiative to tackle the inequalities suffered by one community
might provoke a violent reaction from other communities.
- The situation is made worse when scarce resources has to be shared by the
communities like river water, jobs or government funds etc
NATION:
STATE:
- A state refers to political legal institutions that regulate order within a geographical
territory and exercise social control over the people living within the territory.
- According to Max Weber State is a body that has the monopoly to impose legitimate
force within a particular territory.
NATION AS A COMMUNITY:
NATION-STATE:
- In recent times there has been a one-to-one bond between the nation and the
state-i.e., one state would represent one nation with recognition given to one
single national identity, smoothening out the different community identities in
the process.
- However, in the past, there have been instances when one state would
represent multiple communities as well as national identities, for e.g., the
former Soviet Union.
- There have also been examples of people of a single nation residing as citizens
in different countries.
- There are also examples of dual citizenship laws where citizens of a particular
state can be simultaneous citizens of another state. For e.g., Jewish Americans
can be citizens of both Israel and America, can serve the armed forces of any
country without losing citizenship rights in another country.
- As different nationalities today aspire towards forming a state, a state too
requires to represent the nation in order to gain legitimacy.
- The modern era is characterised by the increasing tendency to establish
democracy and emphasise on nationalism as the basis for political legitimacy.
- Thus, a state needs a nation for legitimacy as much as a nation needs a state
for fulfilling the aspirations for creating a nation-state.
HOW SHOULD THE STATE PART OF THE NATION-STATE TREAT THE DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES
THAT MAKE UP THE NATION?
- Most states feel threatened by cultural diversity and are suspicious about it. This is
because any of the community identities can become the basis for nation formation.
- There is always the fear of jeopardising the national integration.
- Hence the states try to either reduce diversity or eliminate it altogether.
- Thus, the states try to homogenise the different identities into one national identity.
- This homogenisation is done through the processes of assimilation and integration.
ASSIMILATION
INTEGRATION:
- Centralising all power and concentrating it to the political institutions and spaces where
the dominant groups have overwhelming majority. The autonomy of the local or minority
groups are eliminated.
- Imposing a unified legal and justice system, based on the norms and traditions of the
dominant group. All other alternatives and regional variations are overlooked.
- Adopting the dominant group’s language as the only official national language and
making its use mandatory in all public communications.
- Promotion of the dominant group’s culture and traditions through the state-controlled
media and educational institutions.
- Remodelling state symbols to show reverence to the dominant group’s history, heroes
and culture. These are reflected in the choice of national holidays and naming of streets
etc.
- Seizure of lands, forests and other resources previously controlled by indigenous groups
and declaring them as national resources.
CONCLUSION:
- Any community identity can become the basis for nation formation.
- Hence states feel threatened by cultural diversity.
- Hence, they favour a single, national homogenous identity in the hope of preventing
the sustained suppression and alienation of minorities or subordinated communities
that can provoke violent and hostile assertion of community identity, fragmentation of
the nation and in the hope of managing and controlling it.
India is one of the most culturally diverse countries of the world. it has a billion plus
population and the Indian state has been successful in recognizing the cultural diversity
through the motto-unity in diversity.
LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY OF INDIA:
- The Hindus constitute the majority religion. About 828 million people are
Hindus that is roughly around 80.5% of the Indian population.
- The Muslims are the largest minority group in India numbering at 138 million
and 13.4% of India’s population.
- Christians constitute around 2.3%of the population. (24 million)
- The Sikhs constitute 1% of the population. (19 million).
- Buddhists constitute 0.8% of the population, about 8 million.
- Jains constitute 0.4% of the population.
- The Indian State’s relationship with communities can neither be summed up within
the assimilationist model or the Integrationist model despite demands made by the
dominant Hindu group from time to time.
- The Indian state emphasises on National integration but that is suggestive of unity and
fraternity rather than undermining cultural diversity.
- Ours is a secular state but that does not mean that factors such as religion and
language have been banished from the public sphere.
- Strong constitutional provisions have been instituted to protect the minorities of the
country.
- The problem, however, is not with laws or principles but with practice and
implementation.
- India, therefore is a good example of a state-nation.
STATE-NATION
- Immediately after independence, the British Indian arrangement was continued till
the Constitution came into effect.
- Once the Constitution was in place, it was necessary to reorganize the states into
federal units based on language as that was the promise made by the Congress Party.
- Hence India had to be reorganised into ethno-linguistic states based on the
recommendations of the States Reorganization Commission (SRC).
SRC-BACKGROUND:
- In the 1920s, the Indian National Congress was reconstituted on linguistic lines. Its
provincial units were based on language, for e.g., Marathi wing of the Congress, Oriya
wing of the Congress etc.
- Gandhi and the other Nationalist leaders promised that after independence, the new
nation would be reconstituted on linguistic lines.
- This meant that the new federal units would be created on the basis of language.
- However, with independence, came the trauma of Partition. Hence the Nationalist
leaders who vociferously promised the linguistic Reorganisation of States became
sceptical about this idea as they felt it would further fragment the country just as
religion had divided the country as people were zealously committed towards one
faith.
- Nehru, Patel and Rajaji were of the same opinion that linguistic divisions would further
fragment the consciousness of India.
The issues related to religion in a nation like India can be divided into two groups:
•Issues of minority majority
•Issues of communalism and secularism
MINORITY RIGHT AND NATION BUILDING
- Indian Nationalism is characterised by inclusivity and democracy.
- It is inclusive because it allows diversity and plurality.
- It is democratic because it sought to do away with discrimination and exclusion and
establish a just and equal society.
- Indian nationalists were influenced by the ideas humanism and they rejected the evils
of exclusive nationalism.
THE CONSTITUTION AND INCLUSIVE NATIONALISM
- In a country like India, there is every possibility that the dominant group might assert
their identity and impose their culture , language or religion on the nation. To avoid
such a circumstance, the principle of inclusive nationalism was built into our
constitution.
- There are provisions in the constitution that protect the right of the minorities.
FEATURES OF COMMUNALISM
- Communalism is all about Politics and not about religion.
- It refers to strong commitment to one’s religious faith but there is no significant
relationship between personal faith and communalism. A Communalist may or may
not be a devout believer, similarly, a devout believer may or may not be a communalist.
- Communalists believe in a political identity based on religion. Their attitude towards
other religions is of hostility and intolerance. They believe that their religious identity
is superior to any other religious identities.
- Communalists believe that their religious identities supersede all other identities. It is
not important whether one is rich or poor, what one’s occupation is or what one’s
political affiliation is, they believe that members of one religion constitute a
homogeneous category. All Hindus are the same, so as all Muslims. They do not
consider regional variations or any ritual or sectarian variations.
- Hindus of Kerala might have more in common with the Muslims of Kerala but for a
communalist, a Hindu from any region is a co-religionist and they constitute a singular
group.
COMMUNALISM IN INDIA
- Communalism has been an important issue in India’s socio-political history.
- It has been a recurrent source of tension and violence in the country.
- During communal riots, one becomes a nameless, faceless member of one’s
community who is ready to kill, loot and rape in the name of one’s faith.
- They justify their brutal and macabre acts in the name of redeeming the lost
glory and honour of their religion. They commit acts of murder to avenge the
alleged deaths of members of their community elsewhere or even in the
distant past.
- The experience of communal violence becomes even more traumatic for
members of the minority community.
- The ruling party, in all cases of communal violence have a role to play in
abetting it. The history of communal violence in India provides testimony to
that fact. Examples would include the Anti-Sikh riots of 1984 after the
assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards and the Godhra riots
in Gujarat in 2002.
COMMUNALISM-CONCLUSION
- The history of Communalism can be traced back to the colonial period when the
colonialists adopted the policy of divide and rule.
- However, even before the colonial period, there have been instances of communal
riots and violence.
- Religious, cultural, regional and ethnic violence can be found in every phase of Indian
history.
- However, it would be unfair to forget India’s plural past and cultural inter-mixing.
- The syncretic heritage of India is clearly visible during the Bhakti and the Sufi
movements.
- The Indian meaning includes the Western implications but also involves other
features.
- A secular state does not believe in an official religion. It does not favour any religion
over others.
- The State offers to its citizens the Right to Freedom of Religion. According to this right
the state can profess, practice, and propagate any religion.
- The state expresses equal respect for all religions.
PROBLEMS WITH THE INDIAN MEANING:
- A tension is created between the Western sense of the state maintaining a distance
from all religions and the Indian sense where the state shows equal respect for all
religions.
- Supporters of one sense get upset when the state tries to uphold the other sense of
the term secular.
- Many questions are raised such as ‘should the state provide subsidies to Haj pilgrims’?,
‘Should the state manage the Tirupati-Tirumala temple complex’?, ‘Should the state
openly talk about the construction of the Ram Mandir at Ayodhya’? ‘Should the Prime
Minister be present at the opening ceremony of the Ram Temple at Ayodhya’?
- If Cow Slaughter is banned, then pig slaughter should also be banned. If Sikh soldiers
are allowed to wear turbans in the army, the Muslim soldiers should also be allowed
to keep beards.
- Questions such as these generate intense passions and heated debates between
communities that are difficult to settle.
SECULARISM: CONCLUSION:
- The first generation of leaders of Independent India chose to have a liberal, secular
state governed by democratic constitution
- Thus, the state was culturally neutral and the nation was an inclusive political and
territorial community.
- It was expected that with the universalisation of citizenship rights, the participation of
cultural pluralities in competitive politics would change civic and ethnic equations
between communities. This, however, has not been fully materialised but the
Constitution time and again asserted India’s commitment towards a secular fabric.
UNDERSTANDING COLONIALISM
WHAT IS STRUCTURAL CHANGE?
- Structural change refers to changes in institutionalized social arrangements.
- Colonialism in India brought about significant structural changes as modern
ideas and institutions reached India.
- The exposure to modern ideas as a result of colonialism was paradoxical and
contradictory in India.
- For example, Indians read about Western Liberalism and freedom yet they saw
the British denied these ideals to the people of India.
IMPACT OF BRITISH COLONIALISM ON THE DAILY LIVES OF INDIANS
- Modern India today has been shaped by colonial experience. The impact of
colonialism can be felt on social reform, national movement, laws, Constitution.
- Our industries and agriculture, cities and villages have been shaped by the
contradictions of colonialism.
- Our educational system, parliamentary and legal systems have been built on the
British model.
- The English language has also played an important role in creating and nurturing
modern values in India.
- Thus, to conclude, it can be said that structural change in India has been brought
about by the contradictions of India’s colonial experience.
- Structural change in India took place in the context of these contradictions.
TWO STRUCTURAL CHANGES BROUGHT ABOUT BY COLONIALISM
- INDUSTRIALISATION REFERS TO MACHINE BASED PRODUCTION PROCESS WITH THE
USE OF INANIMATE POWER RESOURCES LIKE STEAM AND ELECTRICITY.
- URBANIZATION REFERS TO THE PROCESS OF POPULATION SHIFT FROM RURAL TO
URBAN AREAS.
WHAT IS COLONIALISM?
- Indian History is full of examples of foreign rulers coming to the country and
establishing dynasties or merely plundering the riches of the nation.
- Colonial rule is distinguishable from all other previous attempts to dominate the
country because the changes brought about it radically transformed Indian society,
economy, and polity.
- This difference can be expressed as capitalist and pre-capitalist attempts at empire
building.
- The earlier attempts were referred to as pre-capitalist in nature. Their main objective
was to plunder the country, assure a steady flow of tribute exacted from the economic
surplus that was produced traditionally. No attempt was made to fundamentally alter
the economic base of the nation.
- British colonialism, on the other hand, transformed the economic base and changed
every law of the land to feed to capitalist needs of the British empire.
- They changed the laws of the land for effective capitalist expansion.
- They meddled with land ownership laws.
- They decided on the crops to be grown especially those that would be used as raw
materials for British factories in England.
- They altered the way in which production and manufacturing were organised in the
country.
- The forests were reserved for commercial exploitation. In some parts forests were
cleared for plantation agriculture.
❖ MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE
- People from present day Jharkhand, Bihar migrated to Assam to work on the tea
plantations.
- The new middle class moved to different parts of the country to work as government
officials.
- Professionals such as lawyers and doctors also moved around the country.
- People were also sent to distant colonized lands of Asia and Africa to work as slaves
or labourers. Many died on the way and most could never come back. Their
descendants constitute the Indian diaspora in these foreign lands.
- Between 1834 to 1920, people from various religions, castes and genders were forced
to work on the plantations of Mauritius.
- Most of the recruitment was done from the various districts of Bihar such as Patna,
Gaya, Arrah, Saran, Tirhoot, Champaran and Munger.
❖ NATION STATES
- As a result of colonialism, capitalism became the dominant economic system and
nation state became the dominant political form.
- A Nation is a group of people who share the aspirations of forming a political
collectivity.
- A state refers to politico legal institutions that regulate order within a nation. A
nation state is characterised by sovereignty, citizenship rights and Nationalism. The
primary apparatus of a state is the government with its agencies such as the
Legislature, Executive, Judiciary, Police, the army etc.
- The practice of colonialism and the principle of Nationalism are contradictory in
nature. Nationalism implies that people living within the borders of a nation state have
rights to be sovereign. This sovereignty was denied to the Indians by the British.
- Indian Nationalists recognised this contradiction and during the freedom struggle
declared Swaraj to be their birth right.
- The tea industry is an example of the kind of industrialization that the British promoted
in India.
- The colonial government used coercive methods to hire and keep labourers in the
industry. The government acted on behalf of the British planters rather than the Indian
cultivators.
- The government believed that the laws of a colonized country did not have to conform
to democratic norms.
- The exploitation of the labourers was explicit and unabashed.
- According to this law, the recruitment was done on the basis of indentures.
- The labourers were coerced to sign contracts whereby they would agree to work
on the plantations for a minimum of four years.
- In case of non-fulfilment of the terms of the contract, the workers were threatened
with severe penal action including imprisonment.
- Emphasis was given on the development of heavy industries, a strong public sector
and cooperatives.
- Rapid industrial growth was thought to be the only way to bring about social equity.
The fables of pre-colonial riches were narrated and it was believed that poverty
was preventable.
- Jawaharlal Nehru believed that modern India would be built on the edifice of large
industries and dams which he called the temples of modern India.
• Agriculture
• Industries
• Labour and Population
• Exchange and Finance
• Transport and Communication
• Health and Housing
• General and Technical Education
• Women’s role in a planned economy
- The Committee could not complete its task because the Chairman was arrested by the
British in 1939.
- After independence, the Planning Commission was finally set up initiate the process
of Centralised planning in India.
- The Sociologist M.S.A. Rao emphasised on three different kinds of urban influences
in Independent India.
- Many people in India have migrated to far off states in search of employment leaving
behind their family members in the natal villages. In Madhapur, a village in north-
central India, out of 298 households 77 households have migrants who have migrated
to the cities of Bombay and Calcutta. 75% of them send money to their villages
regularly, around 83% visit their homes about three to four times.
- When an industrial town comes up amidst villages, the village is completely uprooted
as demands for housing and marketplaces grow. The area experiences a structural
transformation.
- The growth of metropolitan cities have also resulted in the absorption of villages
during the process of expansion.
GIST:
Teaching Period: 3rd July, 2023 to 31st July, 2023
BOOK II- SOCIAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA
MODES OF COMMUNICATION
New technologies such as printing press, the telegraph, microphone, steamships, and
railways, helped in the quick movement of people and ideas. Social reformers travelled round
the country to spread the ideas of change. Christian missionaries reached the remote corners
of present-day Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya and thus the idea of a nation as an imagined
community came into existence.
FORMS OF ORGANISATION
Modern Social Organisations such as the Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj, Prarthana Samaj ,
Satyashodhak Samaj , Ramakrishna Mission etc, debated, discussed and held meetings. The
All-India Muslims Ladies Conference (Anjuman E Khawatn E Islam) was founded in 1914.
Translations of religious writings were done to make them accessible to all. Vishnu Shastri
published a Marathi translation of Vidyasagar’s book in Indu Prakash in 1868.
NATURE OF IDEAS
Ideas of Liberalism, freedom, new ideas about homemaking, new roles of women and self-
conscious pride in one’s tradition and culture emerged. The idea of female education was
widely debated. Jyotiba Phule opened the first women’s school in Pune. All ideas of change
were debated within the context of tradition and modernity. Values of modernity were
embraced but not at the cost of traditions. This was a period of questioning, interpreting and
reinterpreting traditions.
VARIED NATURE OF 19TH AND 20TH CENTURY SOCIAL REFORM MOVEMENTS:
- Some movements were concerned with upper caste, middle class men and women.
- For others the injustices suffered by the discriminated castes were issues of primary
importance.
- Some believed that social evils emerged because of the loss of the true essence of
Hinduism.
- For others caste and gender discriminations were inherent in every organised religion.
MUSLIM SOCIAL REFORMERS
- Muslim social reformers debated intensely on the practices of polygamy and
purdah.
- At the All-India Muslim Ladies Conference, Jahanara Shah Nawas proposed the
resolution against the evils of polygamy.
- She argued that the practice is against the true spirit of Islam. She believed that it
was the duty of the educated women of the community to deter the men from
practising it.
- Tehsib e Niswan , a leading journal for women in Punjab, came out in favour of the
resolution but others disapproved of it. However, it was encouraging to see that
people were ready to publicly discuss these issues of religion without the fear of
being blasphemous.
OPPOSITION FACED BY THE HINDU REFORMERS:
- Sati was opposed by the Brahmo Samaj.
- Orthodox members of the Hindu community formed another organisation called
the Dharma Sabha to counter the initiatives taken by the Brahmo Samaj in order
to bring about religious reform.
- These attempts to reform society was seen as interference in the Hindu religion.
- Members of the Dharma Sabha filed a petition with the British that the reformers
had no right to interpret the Hindu sacred texts.
- The Dalits on the other hand spoke in terms of complete rejection of the Hindu
fold. They believed that no amount of reform would be able to change the inherent
and underlying discriminatory practices of the Hindu religion.
SECULARISATION OF RITUALS:
- Rituals today have secular goals and dimensions.
- They provide men and women with opportunities to socialise with friends and family.
- The celebration of religious festivals has also become opportunities to showcase a
family’s wealth.
- The commercial aspect of rituals and festivals have become very conspicuous keeping
in mind the advertisements that use these festivals to make most profit.
- The secular dimension of rituals can be explained by the fact that it is possible today
to offer online puja at any temple in India after the payment of a fee and the websites
claim to deliver the ‘prasad’ within six to seven working days.
SECULARISATION OF CASTE
- This can be seen in caste based political parties.
- Seeking votes and fielding candidates on caste lines.
- Assertion of Rights by caste based political parties.