Are you struggling to find the right topic for your tort law research paper?

Delving into the

complexities of tort law can be both challenging and rewarding. However, the journey of writing a
thesis on this subject is often fraught with obstacles.

From grappling with intricate legal concepts to conducting thorough research and analysis, writing a
tort law research paper demands time, dedication, and expertise. As you navigate through a myriad
of potential topics, you may find yourself overwhelmed by the vast expanse of legal literature and
the need to explore current developments in the field.

The process of selecting a suitable topic alone can be daunting. With numerous areas to explore
within tort law, ranging from negligence and liability to compensation and causation, it's crucial to
identify a research question that is both relevant and impactful.

Moreover, crafting a compelling thesis requires more than just a superficial understanding of legal
principles. It demands a keen insight into judicial precedents, legislative reforms, and scholarly
discourse surrounding tort law.

In the face of such challenges, seeking assistance from reputable academic writing services can offer
invaluable support. ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ stands out as a trusted platform where students can
access professional guidance and expertise in crafting high-quality research papers on tort law.

By availing yourself of the services offered by ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔, you can streamline the
writing process and ensure that your thesis meets the highest standards of academic excellence. From
topic selection to literature review and argumentation, their team of experienced writers and legal
experts is dedicated to helping you achieve your academic goals.

Don't let the complexities of writing a tort law research paper deter you from pursuing excellence in
your academic endeavors. With the right support and resources at your disposal, you can navigate
through the challenges and emerge with a thesis that showcases your intellectual rigor and scholarly
prowess.

Order your tort law research paper from ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ today and embark on a journey
towards academic success.
She will only have to prove that the speeding was an actual and proximate cause of the collision and
will also have to prove the extent of the resulting damages to her. The case study clearly indicates
that the instructor was late for work and hurried through the safety instructions once and that led to
the unpleasant incident. For example, it was once believed that a manufacturer or supplier owed a
duty of care only to immediate purchasers, not to others who might use the product or to whom the
product might be resold. She does not say that he made any attempt to intercept her. It is a widely
accepted statement of the liabilities of sellers of goods for defective products. In the law of tort, in
order for the agrieved party to claim damages under this law, the duty of care must be establist
between the parties. Does it matter whether the injured person is a trespasser or an invitee. Tort law
has had a significant impact on business because modern technology poses significant dangers and
the modern market is so efficient at distributing goods to a wide class of consumers. Lucy has a
right to claim for personal injuries she sustained while she was an employee at Thereza’s company,
since the employer has a duty to care for the employee’s welfare. The burglar who falls into a drained
swimming pool, for example, may have a case against the homeowner unless the courts or legislature
of that state have made it clear that trespassers are owed the limited duty to avoid gross negligence.
Lord Esher MR observed in Lievre v Gould 18 where an action which engrosses a foreseeable peril
of creating direct physical harm to those nearby, as physical nearness will be enough to establish a
particular relationship of proximity19. The aim of the study is to determine where this chemical
reactivity resides in (-)-epicatechin quinone. Torts are commonly subdivided into three broad
categories. If you brake to a stop when you see a child dart out in front of your car, and if the noise
from your tires gives someone in a nearby house a heart attack, you have not acted negligently
toward the person in the house. In fact it contained fireworks, but there was nothing in its
appearance to give notice of its contents. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how
to manage cookies. The chief objective of the rules of causation is to keep out those actions that are
not considered to be the cause of the damage. References Adams, A. (2008). Law for business
students. But what if someone trespassing is injured by the negligence of the landowner. She says he
escorted her back to the desk, that he asked her to let him see the change. Keep on browsing if you
are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. In the light of this event, the wife of Mr.
Tomlinson shall have the right to demand for damages from the teachers for negligence that led to
the death of her husband. She had a duty to fulfill the express terms of the employment contract and
other implied agreements made by Thereza. There are not many studies that enumerate the
relationship between the dengue cases in a particular locality and the meteorological parameters.
What would a totally nonlitigious society be like. It is distinguishable from intentional torts in that
negligence doesn't require the intent to commit a wrongful action; instead, the wrongful action itself
is sufficient to constitute negligence. Basically, a tort law can be described as a civil wrong not
arising from a contract and in the case of negligence, one should owe due consideration to one’s
neighbour (Capiro Industries vs. Likewise, an employee may warn an employer about the conduct or
character of a fellow or prospective employee, and a parent may complain to a school board about
the competence or conduct of a child’s teacher. Beldom LJ opined in Brown v Lewisham and North
Southwark Health Authority that a doctor should exhibit care in the diagnosis, medical check-up, and
treatment of the health condition of his patient, mainly to avoid harm to his health from perils which
a skilled medical practitioner would foresee as probable to result due to his failure to carry-out such
check-up11. The wrongdoer as to them is the man who carries the bomb, not the one who explodes it
without suspicion of the danger.
The author acknowledges the research assistance provided by Rabindra Kr. In such scenarios, the
court is expected to view that the both defendants are accountable. The most obvious type is physical
harm to the person (assault, battery, infliction of emotional distress, negligent exposure to toxic
pollutants, wrongful death) or property (trespass, nuisance, arson, interference with contract). Alan
passed out and was carried into a spare bedr oom by David, ano ther guest. In the meantime, the tort
statute of limitations might have run out, barring the victim from suing at all. In the absence of
contracts, tort law holds individuals legally accountable for the consequences of their actions. This
study explores the relationship between the dengue cases and the meteorological parameters. Strict
liability torts refer to situations where an individual is liable for injury of another no matter the
precautions that were taken. In the event of Lucy leaving Thereza’s company to go and work for a
competitor, this must have caused Thereza some damage, however the act of Lucy might not have
resulted to a tort. In the case of Mr. Tomlinson who tried to rescue the child, the proximate cause of
his demise was the negligent act of the teachers; therefore, the teachers may also be help directly
liable for the death of Mr. Tomlinson based on the law of tort. Thus a newsmagazine may use a
baseball player’s picture on its cover without first obtaining written permission, but a chocolate
manufacturer could not put the player’s picture on a candy wrapper without consent. If the plaintiff
had no actual knowledge of the risk, he cannot be held to have assumed it. The premises are to be
occupied and used by the fraternity “as a fraternity house, clubhouse, dormitory and boarding house,
and generally for religious, educational, social and fraternal purposes.” Such occupation is to be “
under control of the tenant. ” (emphasis added) The annual rental at all times relevant to this case
appears from the record to be one dollar. The main discussion will be centred on the discussion of the
facts surrounding the case and the extent to which duty care can be established in the tort of
negligence. Is there enough closeness between the defendant and the claimant. We all know that we
can go to court when someone strikes us, invades our privacy, creates a nuisance, or acts negligently
toward us. Elsie has the right to recover the amount stolen and compensation of all the items lost in
her house so long as there is reasonable evidence that she owned the property she claims she has lost.
Though false, it might not be libelous, since the publication need contain nothing injurious to
reputation. What about true statements that might be every bit as damaging—for example, disclosure
of someone’s income tax return, revealing how much he earned. However, unless it is fraud
especially in the case of Ultramares Corporation v Touche (1931) 255 NY 170), the aspect of
foreseeability which forms a component of tort of negligent may not be used. The plaintiff
recovered damages against the company because the negligence consisted in the failure to guard
against any one of a number of chance occurrences that could ignite the gas. Johnson v. Kosmos
Portland Cement Co., 64 F.2d 193 (6th Cir. 1933). Nothing in the situation gave notice that the
falling package had in it the potency of peril to persons thus removed. This type of torts is found to a
lesser degree, more often than not in the context of product liability. However, if it is foreseeable that
harm will flow from a negligent condition triggered by a natural event, then there is liability. The
evidence amply supports a conclusion that trampoline use involves risks of serious injuries and that
the potential for an injury such as that experienced by Whitlock was foreseeable. For example, an
employer is responsible for the negligence of his employees if they were acting in the scope of
employment. Therefore, Go Kwick can easily defend the plaintiff under a lawsuit. So-called dram
shop statutes place liability on bar and tavern owners and others who serve too much alcohol to one
who, in an intoxicated state, later causes injury to others. Elsie can also obtain an injunction
therefore, restraining Lucy from ever coming to her home. A mere complaint to the authorities is
insufficient to establish the tort, but any official proceeding will support the claim—for example, a
warrant for the plaintiff’s arrest.
Torts is a category of law that deals with personal injury. Cooke (2010) suggests that in the event that
it can be proved beyond any reasonable doubt by the court that the plaintiff has suffered a civil
injustice, a claim can be raised and a remedy in the form of compensation can be instituted.
Whereby, Bobby was directly involved in a tort for personal negligence. The law attempts to adjust
for harms done by awarding damages to a successful plaintiff who demonstrates that the defendant
was the cause of the plaintiff’s losses. What if the law did not try to reimpose the victim’s costs onto
the tortfeasor. As discussed earlier, instructors are hired by Go Kwick on a contractual basis for a
period of one year; they are responsible for giving the lessons throughout the year. Purchasers of the
product, as well as injured guests, bystanders, and others with no direct relationship with the
product, may sue for damages caused by the product. Smith consequentially broke her left fibula and
was left with three cracked ribs-is an obvious factor, seeing as how the facts of the case prove this.
The system compels the tort-feasor t o compensate the injured party f or his or her losses. Under
product liability negligence, a manufacturer can claim defence under extreme mishandling of his
product. To make defence under this, a manufacturer must foresee some magnitude of mishandling
of his product. Where the defendant succeeds in establishing contributory negligence as a defense,
the common law will assume that this is total defense. Suppose that the driver was carrying a badly
injured person to a nearby hospital and that after slowing down at an intersection, went through a red
light, blowing his horn, whereupon a driver to his right, seeing him, drove into the intersection
anyway and crashed into him. In some cases, tort of negligence is unintentional where the defendant
would have no intention of causing harm or to the plaintiff. Moreover, single nucleotide accuracy
enables us to reveal the influence primary DNA sequence has upon Top2 cleavage—distinguishing
canonical DNA double-strand brea. Just the foreseeability of harm to other is expected under
actionable negligence, likewise, in the contributory negligence, foreseeability of injury or harm to
himself. It also provides the means whereby a person who regards himself or herself as above
suspicion in a dispute can be judged by being declared in public to be on the right by a court
(Postema, 2002). The risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed, and risk imports
relation; it is risk to another or to others within the range of apprehension. Fairness is a noble and
necessary virtue in common law tort. The Constitution exempts members of Congress from suits for
libel or slander for any statements made in connection with legislative business. Klein sued Pyrodyne
for strict liability to recover for his injuries. Under this concept, the defendant is anticipated to
recognise all individuals in the adjacent areas who could sensibly be prone to the peril of harm due to
the defendant’s demeanour. In other states, trespassers may be owed the duty of due care on the part
of the landowner. Is a passenger at the other end of the platform protected by the law against the
unsuspected hazard concealed beneath the waste. Beldom LJ opined in Brown v Lewisham and
North Southwark Health Authority that a doctor should exhibit care in the diagnosis, medical check-
up, and treatment of the health condition of his patient, mainly to avoid harm to his health from
perils which a skilled medical practitioner would foresee as probable to result due to his failure to
carry-out such check-up11. With regards to the Ultramares Corporation v Touche (1931) 255 NY
170) case, it requires the court to be very care when it approaches such an issue which may involve
financial loses that can be attributed to reasonability. A suit in their behalf can be brought my
members of their family. Under the world-at-large concept, defendant is needed to foresee more
remote chances of harm to individuals not in the adjacent area and of harms not as willingly
predictable to happen from his demeanour. In our case, the presence of the mother in the group
mitigated the liability of the teachers. As a result, one of the children fell off the cliff and drowned.
This rule has been abolished by workers’ compensation statutes in most states. A guard on the car,
who had held the door open, reached forward to help him in, and another guard on the platform
pushed him from behind. Thereza being an employer of the twenty employees, she has a duty to take
due care and diligence when dealing with them. In Johnson v Rea Ltd, defendants were stevedores
and there was spillage of soda ash while unloading and failed to make it clean by removing the same.
Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. Such a situation was
presented in one of the most famous US tort cases, Palsgraf v. Therefore, the law of tort is concerned
mostly with involuntary responsibilities that the law imposes on persons. In the meantime, some
vandals had caused fire and as a result, the plaintiffs’ adjacent property was damaged. Strict liability
torts refer to situations where an individual is liable for injury of another no matter the precautions
that were taken. If the defamatory statement is published in written form, it is called libel. The risk
reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed, and risk imports relation; it is risk to
another or to others within the range of apprehension. The law of negligence requires us to behave
with due regard for the foreseeable consequences of our actions in order to avoid unreasonable risks
of injury. For instance, if a washing machine manufacturer supplies a defective product and if A buys
the same and sustains harm, then A is definitely a foreseeable consumer for defective washing
machine manufacturer. That risk arises because of the possibility that a rocket will malfunction or be
misdirected.” Pyrodyne argued that its liability was cut off by the Chinese manufacturer’s
negligence. The law of tort is that branch of law that consists of various torts or wrongful acts
whereby the wrongdoer violates some legal rights vested in another person. If a force of nature
caused the harm, then the defendant was not negligent in the first place. Intentional torts are actions
designed to injure another person or t hat person's property. The dynamic behavior of these
nanoparticles upon local heating is investigated. After complicated negotiations between Pennzoil
and Getty, a takeover share price was struck, a memorandum of understanding was signed, and a
press release announced the agreement in principle between Pennzoil and Getty. Thus conduct that is
twisted or crooked and not straight is a tort. Note that the primary duty of care on the child lies on
the parents. Let us write or edit the research paper on your topic. Is proof that the light was red
always proof of negligence. However the consensus rejected this and came up with a new concept in
Law of Tort. Using the concepts that we are free and autonomous beings with basic rights, we can
see that when others interfere with either our freedom or our autonomy, we will usually react
negatively. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. The law
imputes harsh liability to situations it considers to be naturally dangerous (Jolowicz, 2000). What
would a totally nonlitigious society be like. Intentional torts usually involve actions which may also
constitute a crime, for example an assault. On the other hand, it is easy to claim that you did not
appreciate the danger, and the courts will apply an objective standard of community knowledge (a
“but you should have known” test) in many situations.
Upload Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous
Carousel Next What is Scribd. THE LECTURE STRUCTURE Texts Definition, aims and scope of
law of torts Intentional torts. Damages for these injuries are called compensatory damages An award
of money damages to make the plaintiff whole, as opposed to additional damages (punitive) that
punish the defendant or make an example of defendant. The case Caparo Industries Plc v
Dickman24is pertaining to the professional negligence and the main issue is whether auditors could
be accountable when their reports were banked upon by stakeholders. Let us write or edit the
research paper on your topic. It is the obligation of the plaintiff to prove that he or she has suffered
an economic loss as a result of the action of the person who has been dealing with him or her.
However, the plaintiff may seek two types of damages namely; punitive and compensation damages.
From the case study, it is identified that the instructor had signed a document which described
various duties and responsibilities of the instructors. But if someone sets out intentionally and
maliciously to hurt another person, punitive damages may well be appropriate. At the same time, the
company can file a suit against the unlawful act of the instructor since the kart accident has
adversely affected the goodwill of the Go Kwick. The plaintiff said she was intercepted as she
started to leave the store; that Mr. Krause stood where she could not pass him in going out. In some
cases it can be a genuine mistake and this cannot be considered as negligence. And users who were
not immediate purchasers were said not to be in privity with a supplier or manufacturer. It is to be
noted that in Smith New Court Securities v Citibank5, for the recoverable damage, the test for
foreseeability was extended whereas it was not extended in an action in deceit, which is another tort
of negligence6. As the train rounds the bend, the engineer is distracted by a conductor and does not
see the car until it is too late to stop. At the other end is conduct that most would consider entirely
blameless, in the moral sense. This process of evolution and adaptation rests upon the contribution
made by way of judicial pronouncements. Someti me later, Bob saw that the bedroom was open and
without looking inside locked the door as the room contained his priceless collection of jewe ls. In a
few states, comparative negligence is a complete bar to the plaintiff’s recovery. Redress should be
available for innocent victims of car elessness, recklessness, or intentional injury. They believe that
tort law is a matter of distributive justice which deals with fair apportionment of benefits and losses
of risky activities. Whether the invasion is in a public or private space, the amount of damages will
depend on how the image or information is disclosed to others. If the harm was not willful, he must
show that the act as to him had possibilities of danger so many and apparent as to entitle him to be
protected against the doing of it though the harm was unintended. For example, it was once believed
that a manufacturer or supplier owed a duty of care only to immediate purchasers, not to others who
might use the product or to whom the product might be resold. The woman’s family sued the store
for wrongful death. The fact that she gets to watch how her husband died is so traumatic that any
person would suffer tremendously. The California Supreme Court has said yes. Tarasoff v. Regents
of University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Calif. 1976). Corrective Justice versus Distributive Justice
Some theorists do not really believe that corrective justice is an independent principle of tort law.
Everyone has a duty care for his or her neighbour and it is the role of the courts to establish is this
duty care has been breached whereby compensation will be given as a remedy. To be liable, the
tortfeasor must be the proximate cause of the injury, not a remote cause.
It includes that conduct which is not straight or lawful, but, on the other hand, twisted, crooked or
unlawful. What would a totally nonlitigious society be like. So, the law of tort provides for remedies
to parties who have suffered losses or injuries. A negligent conduct is that which falls bellow an
acceptable standard and it will mount up to a tort if it causes damage to a party. Strict Liability is the
tort-feasor's responsibility for an injury whether or not there is fault or negligence. One important
rule goes by the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur Literally, “the thing speaks for itself.” In tort cases, res
ipsa loquitur creates a presumption that the defendant was negligent because he or she was in
exclusive control of the situation and that the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for
someone’s negligence. He testified further that prior to the date of his injury, he had successfully
executed the one-and-three-quarters front flip between seventy-five and one hundred times. The aim
of the study is to determine where this chemical reactivity resides in (-)-epicatechin quinone. People
have a right to be free to go as they please, and anyone who without cause deprives another of
personal freedom has committed a tort. This rule has been abolished by workers’ compensation
statutes in most states. Where such a case arises, it leads to breach which amount to an intentional
tort. In view of the above scenario involving an accountant, the client and the third party, tort of
negligence can be labelled in the event that the plaintiff can prove beyond any reasonable doubt that
the actions of the accountant have been costly and have resulted in financial losses. There are many
specific types of intentional torts, including. In recent years, many courts have overthrown the older
rule and now recognize the so-called new tort. The criminal proceeding must terminate in the
plaintiff’s favor in order for his suit to be sustained. In one case, the court found that the high levels
of cholesterol, fat, salt, and sugar in McDonald’s food is well known to users. Duty care can be
established in cases involving fraud given that the accountant has the duty to ensure that the funds
belonging to the third parties ought to be safeguarded so as to avert the chances of resultant losses
that can be incurred in the event of negligent behaviour when handling these. With regards to this
normal test, it does not always follow that duty care is owed by the third party which may result in
loss of something which requires the plaintiff to prove that the resultant loss has been a result of the
action of the accountant. In this case, the main question raised was that had the defendant had
foreseen the incident, the damage would not have caused. For example, a work crew failed to
remove residue explosive gas from an oil barge. Based on the test established in the case of Caparo v
Dickman7, there now exist a clear case of foreseeable harm in taking the path by the beach. Unlike
criminal law, however, there need not be a specific intent. There are multiple defenses to this alleged
action; these would include the defenses of contributory negligence, comparative negligence, and
product misuse. (There was never any such case, and certainly no such recovery; it is not known who
started this legend, or why.). Similarly, some ?f the hostility to natural law and natural rights
certainly came from progressives who opposed the use ?f such rights in invalidating progressive and
redistributive legislative action. Damages for these injuries are called compensatory damages An
award of money damages to make the plaintiff whole, as opposed to additional damages (punitive)
that punish the defendant or make an example of defendant. Nevertheless, tort law—except for strict
liability—relies on standards of fault, or blameworthiness. Stevenson (1932) proximity is described
as a situation where a neighbour is a person who is closely and directly affected by somebody’s
actions and ought to reasonably take that fact into account. In this act, the package was dislodged,
and fell upon the rails. When we say damages in tort, this refers to the basic principle of damages for
personal injury. The trial court granted the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, holding
that as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could have found that the University was more negligent
than Whitlock, and that the jury’s monetary award was the result of sympathy, passion or prejudice.
The jury attributed twenty-eight percent of causal negligence to the conduct of Whitlock and
seventy-two percent of causal negligence to the conduct of the University. The court stated, “If
consumers know (or reasonably should know) the potential ill health effects of eating at McDonald’s,
they cannot blame McDonald’s if they, nonetheless, choose to satiate their appetite with a surfeit of
supersized McDonald’s products.” Pellman v. McDonald’s Corp., 237 F.2d 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).
Those who suffer losses at the hands of others can be compensated. The word tort is also derived
from the Latin word tortum, which means twisted or crooked or wrong, in contrast to the word
rectum, which means straight ( rectitude uses that Latin root). Headlines boast of multimillion-dollar
jury awards against doctors who bungled operations, against newspapers that libeled subjects of
stories, and against oil companies that devastate entire ecosystems. All are examples of tort suits. We
are told that one who drives at reckless speed through a crowded city street is guilty of a negligent
act and therefore of a wrongful one, irrespective of the consequences. A suit in their behalf can be
brought my members of their family. Note that based in the case of Bourhill v Young (1943)11, Mr.
Tomlinson became morally bound to help the child therefore, his act of trying to rescue the child is
but logical. Tort law provide remedies for civil wrong committed against the plaintiff. References
Adams, A. (2008). Law for business students. When scavenging ROS, (-)-epicatechin will donate two
electrons and become (-)-epicatechin quinone, and thus take over part of the oxidative potential of
the ROS. In a few states, comparative negligence is a complete bar to the plaintiff’s recovery. They
were said to assume the risk of dangerous conditions or equipment. As the leaders of the group, the
teachers are expected to make prudent decisions to ensure the safety of the children. The man who
attempted to rescue the child also drowned. As a civil action, an intentional tort is considered as one
of the cases in which courts have varying decisions over time. In Dorset Yacht Co v The Home
Office, Lord Diplock held that foreseeability cannot be regarded as the only one yardstick, but it is
essential to give proper weight to the previous decisions, propinquity and public policy12. One
important rule goes by the Latin phrase res ipsa loquitur Literally, “the thing speaks for itself.” In tort
cases, res ipsa loquitur creates a presumption that the defendant was negligent because he or she was
in exclusive control of the situation and that the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for
someone’s negligence. In Heaven v Pender20, Brett Mr emphasised the need of proximity as the
essential requirement on the test of foreseeability. Civil litigation is usually costly and burdensome,
and one who forces another to defend himself against baseless accusations should not be permitted
to saddle the one he sues with the costs of defense. To make defence under this, a manufacturer
must foresee some magnitude of mishandling of his product. Employers must be aware that in many
circumstances, their employees may create liability in tort. Chris tine one of the guests dressed up as
a ghost and jumped out at Alan who was of a nervous disposition. In Macpherson v Buick Motor
Co3, a duty of reasonable care is reposed on all foreseeable consumers of a product and not limited
to those in privity of contract whenever it can be foreseeable that damage will result if the product is
faulty. Engage with your academic circle to sharpen your topic, ensuring it’s manageable and
substantive. In tort law, strict liability is the obligation of liability on a party with no finding of fault.
However, in modern society there are often many different participants in virtually any activity, and
it is less clear who should be labeled as tortfeasor or victim. T he most important type of strict
liability is pr oduct liability, a l egal theory under which the manufacturer or other seller of
unreasonably dangerous or defective product is held liable for injuries the product causes. An
individual is said to be culpable of contributory negligence if he had rationally to have foreseen that,
and, if he did not function as a prudent, reasonable man, there is every chance that he might inure
himself and in his doings, he should see that the chance of others being careless28. A train stopped at
the station, bound for another place.