Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philip
Philip
Paper Presentation
Regd. 1349
0
Introduction
The West became the center of Christianity after Paul’s call to Macedonia. As
Christianity moved westward, it started to be understood through the new world’s thought
forms. Some early church members saw no connection between Athens and Jerusalem, while
others believed that any truth spoken by anyone belongs to Christians. Throughout history,
the church constructed its theology using the thought categories of its time. For example,
Cyril of Alexandria used Greek concepts like “substance,” “nature,” “person,” and
“subsistence when talking about the God-man. Western theologies have always been
influenced by the Greek system of concepts, and Greek philosophy played a significant role
in providing clarity to Western models of theology.
The West’s traditional theological model, influenced by Greek thought, has been
challenged by existentialists. They argue that substance-oriented theology fails to understand
the true essence of humanity. Asian theologians have found the existential ontology of the
West appealing, but it doesn’t fully align with their perspective due to its “subject-object”
framework. The Oriental monistic and intuitive approach to reality holds promise for
bridging the gap. Western thinking tends to embrace duality, while monistic thinking
perceives unity in the world. Monism is often tempered by Christian teachings, which
emphasize a distinction between God and creation.
Asians are developing their own contextualized theologies, challenging the relevance
of Western theology in their cultural context. The goal is to create a theology that is rooted in
the experiences of the Asian church and its world. One approach is the formulation of the
“critical Asian principle,” which identifies distinctively Asian elements for theological
reflection. However, there is still debate about how contextualization should be carried out
and confusion between indigenization and contextualization. Contextualization takes into
account factors such as secularism, technology, and the pursuit of social justice in the Third
World nations.
1
It is important for contextualization to be based on authentic social analysis,
incorporating sociological, anthropological, economic, and political elements. Asian
theologians are aware of the experiences of Asian people and should utilize the richness of
these experiences in their theological reflection through careful social analysis. Today, Asian
theologians are focused on socio-political issues that respond to the needs of Asian people,
including human dignity, freedom, and genuine communion among men. For some
theologians, Christ’s presence in “Asian suffering and hope” is emphasized, while others
advocate for a social amelioration program within the context of God’s mission.
Evaluating these theologies should be based on the grounds of social analysis, as they
reflect on historical reality and the inter-relationships of the painful experiences of Asian
people. Real Theology Asian acknowledges the importance of considering people’s values,
aspirations, and capabilities when determining their needs for modernization. It highlights
how multinational corporations, despite aiming for development, often exacerbate poverty in
Asia. The theologians emphasize that historical context and social analysis should not be the
sole judge of theology’s truthfulness; instead, they reserve this role for the Word of God.
They suggest that exploring different aspects of revelation in relation to specific historical
realities can lead to a new hermeneutic. They also clarify that suspicion does not invalidate
previous biblical interpretations but uncovers previously overlooked truths in different
contexts. Therefore, maintaining the link between social analysis and theology crucial.
The West often differentiates between the symbolic representation and the actual
meaning of “power and principalities.” Scholars believe they represent distortions, evil
forces, determinism, and man’s inability to control the future. For example, Rudolf Bultmann
interprets them as a reflection of existentialism in the New Testament. Amos Wilder criticizes
the interpretation of powers as lacking realism, but his suggestion of “symbolizing cultural
and psychological reality” isn’t much better. Oscar Cullmann takes the language seriously
and sees a close connection between spirits and world government in Paul’s thinking, but this
insight is undeveloped. The purpose here is to show how an Asian framework can lead to a
better understanding of powers and principalities, although it’s not a sufficient method. The
focus is on Colossians, specifically Colossians 1:15-20, which emphasizes Christ’s solidarity
with the world. The interpretation of “powers and principalities” as positive entities is in
contrast to the assumption that they are debased for Christ’s supremacy. These beings are part
of the original creation and can be reconciled to God within the redeemed cosmos.
In Colossians 2:15, the relationship between Christ and powers and principalities is
not purely positive. The need for reconciliation implies that there was once harmony that was
disrupted by the Christ-event on the cross, where the rebels were decisively defeated.
Interpreting the difficult syntax of verse 15, some suggest that God is the subject and powers
and principalities are the direct objects, but this is discouraged by the middle voice of the
verb. Apekdusthai, meaning “to strip oneself of,” is more fittingly understood as Christ
stripping off the powers and principalities. This understanding aligns with Asian unitary
thinking, where the flesh is seen as the means through which demonic spirits exercise control
2
over humans. By voluntarily dying and resurrecting, Christ shatters the demon’s power and
triumphs over them.
A unitary worldview reconciles the disparity between evangelism and social concern.
The role of the powers and principalities in Colossians emphasizes Christ’s supremacy over
the entire cosmos. Biblical dualism is not between the spiritual and social, but between the
Kingdom of the Son and the dominion of dark spirits. Christ’s victory liberates from both
personal and spiritual socio-political bondage. The Church’s responsibility is to proclaim and
effect freedom in all areas of life and society, as dealing with only one aspect diminishes
Christ’s cosmic significance. Therefore, the dichotomy between social action and evangelism
is false.
Man can now shift between realms in the cosmic struggle. The “circumcision done by
Christ” symbolizes the dark dominion. Both forms of circumcision require redemption.
Though originally divine, it is now controlled by dark forces and must submit to Christ before
representing the new kingdom. Redemption does not annihilate, but rather critically affirms
cultural goodness. To emerge, the cosmos must recognize its redemptive relationship. Culture
reaches its potential when it assumes a creaturely posture under Christ’s headship.
Conclusion