Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.1007@s41365 023 01254 8
10.1007@s41365 023 01254 8
10.1007@s41365 023 01254 8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01254-8
Received: 26 February 2023 / Revised: 3 April 2023 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published online: 28 July 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press), Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, the Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Chinese Nuclear Society 2023
Abstract
In this study, an X-band standing-wave biperiodic linear accelerator was developed for medical radiotherapy that can accel-
erate electrons to 9 MeV using a 2.4-MW klystron. The structure works at π/2 mode and adopts magnetic coupling between
cavities, generating the appropriate adjacent mode separation of 10 MHz. The accelerator is less than 600-mm long and
constitutes four bunching cells and 29 normal cells. Geometry optimizations, full-scale radiofrequency (RF) simulations,
and beam dynamics calculations were performed. The accelerator was fabricated and examined using a low-power RF test.
The cold test results showed a good agreement with the simulation and actual measurement results. In the high-power RF
test, the output beam current, energy spectrum, capture ratio, and spot size at the accelerator exit were measured. With the
input power of 2.4 MW, the pulse current was 100 mA, and the output spot root-mean-square radius was approximately
0.5 mm. The output kinetic energy was 9.04 MeV with the spectral FWHM of 3.5%, demonstrating the good performance
of this accelerator.
Keywords Standing-wave accelerating structure · RF analysis · Thermal DC gun · Low-power RF test · High-power
experiment
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
110 Page 2 of 12 J. Gao et al.
Parameter Value
13
Design, fabrication, and testing of an X‑band 9‑MeV standing‑wave electron linear accelerator Page 3 of 12 110
Value 9.3 9.3 165 8900 Fig. 3 (Color online) Vacuum model of one normal cell comprising
accelerating and coupling cells
13
110 Page 4 of 12 J. Gao et al.
Fig. 4 (Color online) Vacuum model of cavity chain, external coupler, and waveguide for RF simulation in CST
13
Design, fabrication, and testing of an X‑band 9‑MeV standing‑wave electron linear accelerator Page 5 of 12 110
Fig. 6 (Color online) a Components of waveguide window system: tangular flange. c S parameter plots of waveguide window. Blue and
SF6 (green section) in the waveguide close to the power source and orange lines correspond to S11 and S21. S11 is lower than − 20 dB at
high vacuum (blue section) in the external coupler, separated by 9.3 GHz, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed waveguide
quartz slice (gray section). b Mechanical design of waveguide win- window design
dow, including copper connector, cooling water pipe, and BJ84 rec-
transmission waveguides contain SW components. The RF 4 Accelerating electric field buildup time.
window should be positioned far from the antinode of the
SW and near the wave node, as indicated in Fig. 7, to reduce The field buildup time of an RF structure is closely
the probability of dielectric breakdown on the surface of the related to its loaded quality factor. Unloaded quality factor
quartz window. Q0 of the cavity chain was obtained via CST simulation.
13
110 Page 6 of 12 J. Gao et al.
Fig. 7 (Color online) Magnitude of SW electric field inside waveguide and coupler when RF breakdown occurs in accelerator and input RF
power is fully reflected
The loaded quality factor can be directly calculated using 3 Simulation of thermal DC gun and beam
Q0 and external coupling coefficient β. dynamics
Q0
QL = (6)
1+𝛽
A. Thermal DC gun.
Based on the results of the RF analysis, -QLwas cal-
culated as approximately 3055. In the field construction We adopted a thermal cathode DC gun as the electron
process inside the accelerator, basic parameters, such as source, constituting a cathode, heating filament, focusing
the electromagnetic field and input impedance within the electrode, anode, insulating ceramic shell, and connector to
structure, change exponentially. In particular, the ampli- the accelerator. The emission model was simulated using the
tude of the electric field in the cavity increases exponen- CST particle module. The emission current at 12.5-kV high
tially with time, as follows: voltage is 320 mA, and the perveance is 0.23 μP. The simula-
tion results and basic parameters are shown in Fig. 8, while
𝜔 t
E − 2Q0 − tt the basic parameters of the DC gun are listed in Table 3.
Esteady
=1−e L =1−e F . (7)
2 Thermal DC gun.
Further, at the end of the transient time 4 ⋅ tF , the mag-
nitude of the electromagnetic field was calculated to reach Our design process involved a beam dynamics study
approximately 98% of the steady state. During the electro- using the ASTRA codes. The apertures were carefully set
magnetic field construction, the field distribution is time- based on the nose position and the radius. We matched the
varying, reaching 9.0 MeV at the steady state. According actual accelerating structure and achieved an accurate beam
to theoretical calculations, there exists an optimal injec- loss calculation. The pulse beam current of 100 mA and
tion time topt at which the injected electron beam is stably capture ratio of 32% were achieved. The results of the beam
accelerated to 9.0 MeV and continues after this time [14]. dynamics calculations are displayed in Fig. 9.
� The accelerating structure generates weak RF focus-
⎛ 𝛽e P0 ⎞⎟
= ⎜ln
I ing/defocusing on the electron beams during their transit.
topt ⋅ tF . (8)
⎜ 2 ZT 2 L ⎟ Depending on the electric field distribution of the symmetric
⎝ ⎠
accelerating cell, the electrons were alternately focused and
We can obtain that topt ≈ 2.46 ⋅ tF . Compared with the defocused. However, their momentum is greater when the
10-μs microwave macro-pulse width, the transient field electrons are focused than when they are defocused, leading
buildup time is only 0.27 μs, and can thus be ignored. to an overall focusing effect.
13
Design, fabrication, and testing of an X‑band 9‑MeV standing‑wave electron linear accelerator Page 7 of 12 110
4 Low‑power RF test
5 High‑power RF experiment
Table 3 Parameters of thermal Parameter Ve (kV) Ie (mA) Pe (μP) Rw (mm) Lw (mm) Rh (mm)
cathode DC gun
Value 12.5 320 0.23 0.316 13.05 1.5
Ve high voltage applied between cathode and anode, Ie emission current, Pe gun perveance, Rw RMS radius
at beam waist, Lw distance between beam waist and cathode, and Rh beam pipe radius
13
110 Page 8 of 12 J. Gao et al.
The vacuum degree of the accelerating structure should Analyzer was employed as the measuring instrument. No
remain lower than 10–6 Pa. With fixed performance of the significant frequency shift was observed after brazing. The
thermal DC gun, the corresponding applied high voltage can simulation results were slightly higher than the external
be adjusted to change the emission current: The emission coupling coefficient of 1.8. The reason for this may be an
and pulse beam currents increased as the voltage increased. error in the waveguide port calibration before the cold test,
The mismatch between the initial kinetic energy and accel- as well as the unsatisfactory electrical contact between the
erating field caused a drop in the capture ratio at excessive waveguide window and measurement port.
voltages (> 13 kV). Therefore, we adjusted the high voltage Based on a study on the RF breakdown phenomenon
in the range of 12–13 kV for the high-power experiment. of a high-gradient accelerating structure, we know that
Subsequently, the RF characteristics of the completed the RF BDR is closely related to the accelerating gradient
accelerator were determined. For this, the reflection coeffi- and RF pulse width. The relationship between the BDR,
cient, SW ratio, quality factor, and external coupling coef- accelerating gradient, and pulse width can be expressed as
ficient were calculated. An R&S ZVA60 Vector Network follows [19, 20, 21]:
13
Design, fabrication, and testing of an X‑band 9‑MeV standing‑wave electron linear accelerator Page 9 of 12 110
BDR
30 t5
= const. (9)
Eacc p
13
110 Page 10 of 12 J. Gao et al.
13
Design, fabrication, and testing of an X‑band 9‑MeV standing‑wave electron linear accelerator Page 11 of 12 110
6 Conclusion
13
110 Page 12 of 12 J. Gao et al.
57760/s cienc edb.j 00186.0 0117 and https://c str.c n/3 1253.1 1.s cienc edb. 10. C.M. Ma, S.B. Jiang, Monte Carlo modelling of electron beams
j00186.00117. from medical accelerators. Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 157 (1999).
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/12/201
Declarations 11. https://www.cst.com
12. https://www.desy.de/~mpyflo/
Conflict of interest Jia-Ru Shi is an editorial board member for Nu- 13. J. Shi, Studies of RF deflecting/crab cavities for beam manipula-
clear Science and Techniques and was not involved in the editorial tion and diagnostics. Dissertation, Tsinghua University, Beijing,
review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that 2009 (in Chinese)
there are no competing interests. 14 T.P. Wangler, RF linear accelerators (Wiley, Hoboken, 2008)
15. X.C. Lin, H. Zha, J.R. Shi et al., Development of a 7-cell S-band
standing-wave RF-deflecting cavity for Tsinghua Thomson scat-
tering X-ray source. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 36 (2021). https://doi.
References org/10.1007/s41365-021-00871-5
16. X.C. Lin, H. Zha, J.R. Shi et al., Design, fabrication, and testing
1. C.X. Tang, Present status of the accelerator industry in Asia, in of low-group-velocity S-band traveling-wave accelerating struc-
Proceedings of the 1st International Particle Accelerator Confer- ture. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/
ence, Kyoto, Japan, 2010 s41365-022-01124-9
2. E. Tanabe, A. Associates, Medical application of C-band accelera- 17. J. Shi, A Grudiev, A Olyunin et al. Tuning of CLIC accelerating
tor technologies, in Proceedings of the 19th International Linear structure prototypes at CERN, in Proceedings of the 28rd Inter-
Accelerator Conference, Chicago, USA, 1998 national Linear Accelerator Conference, Tsukuba, Japan, (2010)
3. C.X. Tang, H.B. Chen, Y. Liu et al., Low-energy linacs and their 18. J. Shi, A. Grudiev, W. Wuensch, Tuning of X-band traveling-wave
applications in Tsinghua university, in Proceedings of the 23rd accelerating structures. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A. 704, 14 (2013).
International Linear Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, USA, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.182
2006 19. M.M. Peng, J.R. Shi, H. Zha et al., Development and high-gradient
4. Y. Kamino, S. Miura, M. Kokubo et al., Development of a new test of a two-half accelerator structure. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 60
concept automatic frequency controller for an ultra-small C-band (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00895-x
linear accelerator guide. Med. Phys. 34, 1797 (2007). https://doi. 20. V. Dolgashev, Study of basic breakdown phenomena in high gra-
org/10.1118/1.2752581 dient vacuum structures. in Proceedings of Linear Accelerator
5. X.C. Lin, H. Zha, J.R. Shi et al., Fabrication, tuning, and high- Conference, LINAC2010, Tsukuba, Japan, 2010
gradient testing of an X-band traveling-wave accelerating structure 21. V. Dolgashev, S. Tantawi, Y. Higashi et al., Geometric dependence
for VIGAS. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 33, 102 (2022). https://doi.org/10. of radio-frequency breakdown in normal conducting accelerating
1007/s41365-022-01086-y structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 171501 (2010). https://doi.org/
6. J.H. Shao, H.B. Chen, Q.Z. Xing, Design of a C-band 6 MeV 10.1063/1.3505339
standing-wave linear accelerator structure, in Proceedings of the 22. A. Grudiev, W. Wuensch, S. Calatroni, New local field quantity
2nd International Particle Accelerator Conference, San Sebastian, describing the high gradient limit of accelerating structures. Phys.
Spain, 2011 Rev. Spec. Top-Ac. 12, 102001 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/
7. J.H. Shao, H. Zha, H.B. Chen, Fabrication and high power RF test PhysRevSTAB.12.102001
of a C-band 6 MeV standing-wave linear accelerating structure, in 23. A. Degiovanni, W. Wuensch, G.N. Jorge, Comparison of the
Proceedings of the 3rd International Particle Accelerator Confer- conditioning of high gradient accelerating structures. Phys. Rev.
ence, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2012 Accel. Beams. 19, 032001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysR
8. J.H. Shao, H. Zha, H.B. Chen et al., High power test of a C-band evAccelBeams.19.032001
6 MeV standing-wave linear accelerator, in Proceedings of the 4th
International Particle Accelerator Conference, Shanghai, China, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds
2013 exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the
9. J.H. Shao, Y.C. Du, H. Zha et al., Development of a C-band 6 author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted
MeV standing-wave linear accelerator. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams. manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of
16, 090102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16. such publishing agreement and applicable law.
090102
13