Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bes, Stone 2020 - Eastern - Sigillata - A - at - Home
Bes, Stone 2020 - Eastern - Sigillata - A - at - Home
Volume 3
Offprint
ESA is best known as a fine red slipped imported ware of Late Hellenistic and Early Roman date
(see distribution map). But it was not an import everywhere – it had a home in eastern coastal Ci-
licia, and our goal is to elucidate how people in Cilicia used ESA dishes1. To do so, we will exam-
ine Hellenistic tablewares from Kinet Höyük/Issus, a port town on the Cilician coast occupied on
and off from the Early Bronze Age through the Middle Ages and excavated by teams led by Mar-
ie-Henriette Gates of Bilkent University between 1992 –20112. At Kinet Höyük, we have been
able to identify three stratigraphically distinct horizons associated with reconstructable Hellenistic
pottery. One of these dates from the mid to late 3 rd century BCE, another to the first half of the
2 nd century BCE and a third to the end of the 2 nd or early in the 1 st century BCE after which
the site was abandoned until the Middle Ages, though a token presence of Late Roman pottery
can be mentioned3. We will show that despite obvious differences in manufacture and appear-
ance between ESA and earlier Cilician tablewares, the functional range of ESA is broadly consis-
tent with earlier Hellenistic traditions of drinking and dining in evidence at Kinet Höyük.
We will begin with a summary of ESA, the export product, and how the range of shapes
traded abroad compares with those used at Kinet Höyük. Data compiled from the ICRATES da-
tabase shows that in the late 2 nd and early 1 st century BCE three ESA shapes were popular in all
the regions to which it was exported: upturned rim plates of two types (Hayes’s forms 3, 4)4
which together make up from 30.1% to 59.2 % of vessels on the export market, while footed
hemispherical bowls (Hayes form 22) range from 19.7 to 29.6 % (see fig. 1)5. The plates were
* We thank Marie-Henriette Gates, director of the in the 2 nd or early in the 1 st century BCE. We thank
Kinet Höyük excavations and Charles Gates, who oversaw Patrick Monsieur for sharing his readings of the stamped
the excavations of the Hellenistic remains. Our thanks for amphora handles.
allowing us to examine and present this material. 4 For Hayes’ typology, the source for the form num-
1 For discussion of the origins of ESA see Lund 2005; bers referred to here, see Hayes 1985. See also Slane 1997
Lund et al. 2006; Slane 1997. and Tidmarsh 2011.
2 For a summary of the Persian and Hellenistic re- 5 While there are regional variations in the various
mains from Kinet Höyük see Gates 2015. export markets, the general patterns we highlight here
3 The latest independently datable Hellenistic item pertain in all of them. For detailed discussion of quantities
from the site is a stamped Rhodian amphora handle dated of published ESA and other wares in these markets, see Bes
110 – 86 BCE, suggesting along with the particular ESA 2015, 27– 82.
types present that Kinet Höyük was abandoned very late
655
Fig. 1: Chart showing ESA percentages by function in export market (average), from published sites in Cilicia
and the Levant, and Kinet Höyük. Hayes forms shown in parentheses with the exception of Slane’s TA type 31
(Credit: authors).
for serving and food, and although often referred to as cups, it is possible that the footed hemi-
spherical bowls were meant for individual diners given that they are not well-suited to cupping
in hand, have no handles, and because at coastal Cilician and Levantine sites ESA vessels more
obviously suited to drinking like hemispherical and mold made bowls are well represented, un-
like in the export market6. Hellenistic ESA shapes that occur infrequently on Cyprus and rarely
in the Aegean or Italian export markets include conical cups and rounded hemispherical drinking
bowls (Hayes’ forms 17–19, 23 –25), large chalices or small kraters (Hayes’ forms 15, 26) and
closed vessels, mostly lagynoi (Hayes’ forms 101+). Thus, most of the rare ESA shapes on the ex-
port markets are for wine service and consumption7. The discussion above summarizes Hellenis-
tic ESA as most archaeologists working in Asia Minor, Cyprus, Greece, and Italy encounter it – a
distinct series of table vessels for serving food and perhaps drinking, mostly upturned rim plates
and footed hemispherical bowls that starts to appear late in the 2 nd century BCE.
Published results from sites in Cilicia and the Levant indicate a much different situation
closer to ESA’s source, with a greater frequency of drinking vessels in particular. But to date,
there has not been a thorough publication of pottery from a well-stratified Hellenistic site in
coastal Cilicia to show how this pattern might relate to established patterns of production and
preferences among people living in ESA’s region of origin. Our ongoing work on the Hellenistic
pottery from Kinet Höyük seeks to address that lacuna. As a first step, Philip Bes counted 1, 129
ESA vessels from the site. His analysis shows that as in the export market at Kinet Höyük, the
most common ESA shapes in terms of function are footed hemispherical bowls (439) and plates
6 It is also possible that these bowls were used differ- vessels made in the Aegean late in the Hellenistic period,
ently in different places according to local traditions. such as Ephesian mold made bowls (e. g., Rogl 2014,
7 The intensive trade in ESA plates and bowls is 136 –137 fig. 22) and two handled Knidian cups (e. g.,
interesting in relation to the intensive export of drinking Kçgler 2014, 158 f. 168 f.).
656
(369) for dining and serving food. But, unlike on the Aegean, Asia Minor, and Italian export
markets, handle-less round bottomed drinking vessels are numerous, including unfooted hemi-
spherical/conical bowls with various rim configurations and decorative schemes (223). Less com-
mon are mold made bowls (11), deep conical cups (6), and inset rim skyphoi (7) for a total of
248 drinking vessels or 22 % of the total compared with an average of 5.5 % in export markets.
These drinking vessels were accompanied regularly by vessels for serving wine – Hayes’ forms 15
and 26 – which are either large chalices or small kraters (23) and closed vessels (mostly lagynoi,
40); together these forms make up 5.5 % of the ESA total compared to 3 % on the export mar-
ket. As is shown on fig. 1, the ESA assemblage at Kinet Höyük corresponds with an overall Cili-
cian and Levantine pattern late in the Hellenistic period that includes a greater proportion of
ESA drinking and service vessels than in export markets.
Perhaps we can understand the greater quantities of these particular ESA shapes in coastal
Cilicia and Kinet Höyük, in particular, if we consider the habits of drinking and dining evident
in the dishes of people living in coastal Cilicia earlier in the Hellenistic period, in the middle of
the 3 rd and in the first half of the 2 nd century. We will focus specifically on pottery from well-
dated and coherent contexts from Kinet Höyük with the caveat that study of the Hellenistic stra-
tigraphy and quantification of pottery are ongoing. The emphasis here is on how the assemblage
as a whole functioned and looked rather than precise typological details or exact quantities.
8 Gates 2015, 93 f. fig. 13. predecessor of ESA were notably absent in both of these
9 Mold made bowls and vessels in the black slipped deposits.
657
Fig. 2: 3 rd century BCE vessels in slipped Cilician fine ware from Kinet Höyük (Credit: Lesley Boggs; Kinet
Höyük Excavations).
10 Stone 2013 (referred to there as “central coastal bowls with incurved rims served as drinking vessels in
fine ware”); Élaigne 2015, 275 f. 292. 294 figs. 8. 10; assemblages that do not feature many hemispherical bowls,
https://www.levantineceramics.org/wares/southern-phoeni- kantharoi, or skyphoi see Hudson 2016, 218 fig. 15.
cian-persian-hellenistic-fine-ware. For the possibility that
658
Fig. 4: 3 rd century BCE imports from Kinet Höyük (Credit: authors; Kinet Höyük Excavations).
1 1 Gates 2015, 94– 95 fig, 14, 15. 386 –168, 386 –167, 98 – 53, 386 –156, 386 –161, 98 –
12 E. g., Berlin – Stone 2016, 162 –164 figs. 9.12, 164, 98 –10; Slane 1997, 271–282.
1. 2. 12. 13. 16; Élaigne 2007, 109. 114 f. 138 fig. 14, 13 Gates 2015, 91– 93 fig. 12.
659
Fig. 5: Group of early to mid- 2 nd century vessels found together in area G at Kinet Höyük (Credit: Marie-Hen-
riette Gates; Kinet Höyük Excavations).
Fig. 6: Early to mid- 2 nd century BCE serving vessels from Kinet Höyük (Credit: Authors; Kinet Höyük Excava-
tions).
saucers with ledge rims (fig. 5 b) and skyphoi with vertical handles generally similar to those of
the earlier Hellenistic period appear in both contexts (fig. 5 a) along with the same sort of project-
ing rim kraters seen in the 3 rd century. New shapes in slipped Cilician fine ware include saucers
and plates with grooved rims (fig. 5 d) along with column kraters and table amphoras for serving
wine (fig. 6 a. c). As mentioned above, vessels in BSP, another probable Cilician fine ware, first
660
Fig. 7: BSP vessels from Kinet Höyük (Credit: Lesley Boggs; Kinet Höyük Excavations).
appear in these deposits (figs. 5 e; 7). Some BSP shapes are the same as those represented in
slipped Cilician fine ware, including bowls with incurved and everted rims (fig. 7 a. b). Shapes
not seen in slipped Cilician fine ware occur as well, including fishplates and platters with hanging
rims (fig. 7 c), plates with upturned rims, platters with offset rims, footed hemispherical bowls,
hemispherical and mold made drinking bowls (fig. 7 d), and chalices or small kraters. Imported
table vessels continued to appear regularly in the early to mid 2 nd century BCE, including in-
curved rim bowls (fig. 5 c), hemispherical bowls with interior decoration, mold made bowls prob-
ably originating in the Aegean, and table amphoras with stepped rims and west slope decoration
probably also originating in the Aegean (fig. 6 b)14.
We would like to make three points about this mid- 2 nd century BCE table assemblage in
juxtaposition with that of the mid to late 3 rd century. First, there are notable differences. Chief
among these is the occurrence of BSP. The fabric of BSP vessels is generally similar to slipped Ci-
lician fine ware except that it is somewhat cleaner, fired harder, and vessels are entirely coated in
a smooth, semi-lustrous slip sometimes fired all black or dark purple, but more often mottled
black, purple, and/or red. Like ESA, many BSP vessels show signs of production using tools,
especially on the floor of the vessels and around the feet and sometimes on vessel walls to make
vertically incised flutes. New forms also appeared, for dining there were now grooved rim saucers
and hanging rim fishplates in multiple sizes, including large ones that may have been for group
serving. For drinking, mold made bowls and other round bottomed drinking vessels appear, and
projecting rim kraters were joined or perhaps replaced by column kraters for serving wine. Two
handled table amphoras appear (fig. 6 a. b), possibly replacing fine jugs with overhanging rims
and high arching handles.
Second, despite the introduction of BSP and changes in vessel forms, there is substantial
functional continuity. The only new forms from a functional standpoint are larger plates and plat-
ters for serving food to groups and round bottomed drinking bowls that would have required the
drinker to drain them before putting them down15. Indeed, as mentioned above, many specific
forms such as incurved rim bowls and vertical handled skyphoi continued in use. The overall ar-
ray of shapes and their relative representation, including plenty of vessels for eating, drinking
and serving wine matches the situation at Kinet Höyük in the 3 rd century quite well.
Third, there were still plenty of imports, and perhaps most obviously, a lot of chromatic
variety: black, red, purple, and shades of brown and gray, even within individual room groups in
area G (fig. 5). For the people who lived at this coastal Cilician town in the first half of the 2 nd
14 Cf. Schfer 1968 pls. 17–20, 67– 71. 1 5 See Rotroff, this volume.
661
Fig. 8: ESA vessels from Kinet Höyük (Credit: Lesley Boggs; Kinet Höyük Excavations).
century BCE, a table assemblage of heterogeneous appearance was satisfactory and perhaps even
desirable, so long as it facilitated a nice presentation of food and wine in keeping with traditions
already seen in the 3 rd century.
662
BCE, given that the latest datable ESA shapes in the abandonment debris include many up-
turned rim plates with wide feet of Hayes forms 3 – 4 (fig. 8 d) and occasional plates with molded
rims of Hayes form 9 (fig. 8 b)17. Although there is some disturbance from Medieval pits and
graves, it was not an extensive leveling, and so the final Hellenistic assemblage can be picked out
clearly from the well-preserved or reconstructable vessels of Hellenistic date found in this archi-
tectural level.
People at Kinet Höyük late in the 2 nd century or early in the 1 st used ESA upturned rim
plates (fig. 8 d) and occasionally offset rim platters for serving food, and individuals used smaller
plates and footed hemispherical bowls (fig. 8 a) along with a few carinated (fig. 8 c) and occasion-
ally ledge rim bowls. For drinking, residents used ESA unfooted bowls of various sorts (fig. 8 e)
and less often deep conical cups and inset rim skyphoi. Large chalices or small kraters and lagy-
noi in ESA (Fig. 8 f–g) were used for serving wine. The Late Hellenistic table assemblage in-
cludes an abundance of ESA and very little else. There are almost no imported table vessels
(although imported amphoras continue) and almost no local tablewares that are not in
ESA. Likewise, there is almost no color but red in this assemblage.
When considered in relation to the household equipment used by residents of Kinet
Höyük earlier in the Hellenistic Period, we see substantial changes in technology, style/color, and
consumption of imported tablewares. These differences have fascinating implications for our un-
derstanding of trade, industry, fashion, and innovation in the 2 nd century. But viewed in the
context of ESA’s likely coastal Cilician origin the functional shift is, in our view, not as dramatic.
Several of the ESA shapes that are better represented at Kinet Höyük than in the export market
are for drinking and serving wine, and that fits with a longstanding coastal Cilician tradition of
local production of wine drinking and serving vessels. At Kinet Höyük, we see ESA at home, ser-
ving Cilician household needs that stretch back generations before its invention.
Acknowledgements
Study visits in 2006 and 2007 by Jeroen Poblome and the first author (both University of Leu-
ven, Belgium, at the time), were supported by the Research Fund of the University of Leuven
and the Research Foundation Flanders, as is Philip Bes’ continued study of Kinet Höyük’s Helle-
nistic pottery, in collaboration with Peter Stone.
References
Berlin – Stone 2016 A. M. Berlin – P. J. Stone, The Hellenistic and Roman Pottery, in: M. Hartal – D. Syon –
E. Stern – A. Tatcher (eds.) Akko II: The 1991–1998 Excavations, The Early Periods (Jerusa-
lem 2016) 133 –202
Bes 2015 P. Bes, Once Upon a Time in the East: The Chronological and Geographical Distribution of
Terra Sigillata and Red Slip Ware in the Roman East (Oxford 2015)
Élaigne 2007 S. Élaigne, Les importations de céramiques fines hellénistiques à Beyrouth (site BEY 002)
aperçu du faciès nord levantin, Syria 84, 2007, 107–142
17 Hayes 2008, 25 –26, suggests a date in the third 40 BCE, when both sites were unoccupied. Perhaps this
quarter of the 1 st century for these plates but notes that the was simply a rare, and thus hard to date, shape. In the
evidence is “scanty,” suggesting that the sample from in- absence of any Hellenistic or Early Roman stamped am-
dependently datable contexts is insufficient to date them phora handles or coins postdating 110 – 86 BCE at Kinet
precisely. Slane 1997, 301 also notes their scarcity at Höyük, a date towards the end of the 2 nd or beginning of
Corinth and Tel Anafa and interprets this as evidence the 1 st century for the abandonment seems most likely.
that these plates were most common between c. 75 and
663
Élaigne 2015 S. Élaigne, La vaisselle de table en phénicie à l’époque Hellénistique, in: J. Alquot – C. Bon-
net (eds.), La phénicie Hellénistique (Paris 2015) 267–294
Gates 2015 C. Gates, Kinet Höyük (Classical Issos): A Harbor Town in Southeast Cilicia during the Per-
sian and Hellenistic Periods, Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Stu-
dies 3.2, 2015, 81–104
Hayes 1985 J. Hayes, Sigillate Orientale, in: Atlante delle forme ceramiche. Vol. 2, Ceramica fine Roma-
na nel bacino Mediterraneo (tardo ellenismo e primo impero) (Rome 1985) 1– 96
Hayes 2008 J. Hayes, Roman Pottery: Fine Ware Imports, Agora 32 (Princeton 2008)
Hudson 2016 N. Hudson, A Hellenistic Household Ceramic Assemblage from Tell el-Timai (Thmuis),
Egypt: A Contextual View, BASOR 376, 2016, 199 –244
Kçgler 2014 P. Kögler, The Tableware from Knidos: The Local Production during the 2 nd and 1 st centu-
ries BC, in: P. Guldager Bilde – M. Lawall (eds.) Pottery, Peoples and Places: Study and In-
terpretation of Late Hellenistic Pottery (Aarhus 2014) 157–173
Lund 2005 J. Lund, An Economy of Consumption: The Eastern Sigillata A Industry in the Late Hellenis-
tic Period, in: J. Poblome – P. Talloen – R. Brulet – M. Waelkens (eds.), Early Italian Sigil-
lata: The Chronological Framework and Trade Patterns (Leuven 2005) 3 –15
Lund et al. 2006 J. Lund – D. Malfitana – J. Poblome, Rhosica vasa Mandavi (Cic. Att. 6.1.13), Towards the
Identification of a Major Ceramic Tableware Industry of the Eastern Mediterranean: Eastern
Sigillata A, ArchCl 57, 2006, 491– 508
Rogl 2014 C. Rogl, Mouldmade Relief Bowls from Ephesus – The Current State of Research, in: P.
Guldager Bilde – M. Lawall (eds.), Pottery, Peoples and Places: Study and Interpretation of
Late Hellenistic Pottery (Aarhus 2014) 113 –139
Rotroff 2020 S. Rotroff, Drinking without handles in the Age of Alexander, in: I. Kamenjarin – M. Ugar-
ković (eds.), Exploring the neighborhood. The role of ceramics in understanding place in the
Hellenistic world. Proceedings of the 3 rd Conference of IARPotHP Kaštela, June 2017, 1 st–
4 th (Wien 2020) 61– 72
Schfer 1968 J. Schäfer Hellenistic Keramik aus Pergamon (Berlin 1968)
Slane 1997 K. W. Slane, Tel Anafa. Vol. 2.1, The Hellenistic and Roman Pottery: The Fine Wares, S. C.
Herbert (ed.), JRA Suppl. 10.2.1 (Ann Arbor, Michigan 1997) 249 – 406
Stone 2013 P. J. Stone, Hidden in PLAIN Sight: Ceramic Assemblages and Daily Life in the Ptolemaic
Southern Levant, in: N. Fenn – C. Römer-Strehl (eds.), Networks in the Hellenistic World:
Pottery in the Eastern Mediterranean and Beyond, BARIntSer 2539, 2013, 295 –301
Tidmarsh 2011 J. Tidmarsh, The Imported Fine Wares at Jebel Khalid, in: H. Jackson – J. Tidmarsh (eds.),
Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates 3, The Pottery (Sydney 2011) 279 – 430
664
Sarah Japp – Patricia Kögler (eds.), Traditions and Innovations. Tracking the Development of
Pottery from the Late Classical to the Early Imperial Period. Proceedings of the 1 st Conference
of IARPotHP Berlin, November 2013, 7 th–10 th, IARPotHP 1 (Wien 2016)
Annette Peignard-Giros (ed.), Daily Life in a Cosmopolitan World. Pottery and Culture during
the Hellenistic Period. Proceedings of the 2 nd Conference of IARPotHP, Lyon, November
2015, 5 th – 8 th, IARPotHP 2 (Wien 2019)
Ivanka Kamenjarin – Marina Ugarković (eds.), Exploring the Neighborhood. The Role of
Ceramics in Understanding Place in the Hellenistic World. Proceedings of the 3 rd Conference of
IARPotHP, Kaštela, June 2017, 1 st – 4 th, IARPotHP 3 (Wien 2020)
The Museum of the Town of Kaštela, Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb and The Croatian
Science Foundation’s Roman Economy in Dalmatia: production, distribution, and demand in
light of pottery workshops (RED, IP-11- 2013- 3973) supported both the conference and its pro-
ceedings. The printing of this publication was made possible by generous grants received from
the University of Colorado Boulder (Kayden Research Grant) and CERAMICA-Stiftung Basel,
as well by private donations.
Private donors:
Guy Ackermann
Raffaella Da Vela
Anna Gamberini
Mariola Hepa
Sarah James
Norbert Kramer
Alexandros Laftsidis
Sandra Mermelstein
Ewdoksia Papuci-Władyka
Annette Peignard-Giros
Susan Rotroff
Graham Shipley
Marina Ugarković
Natalia Vogeikoff
General
John Lund
The Possible Impact of Globalised Hellenistic Economy on Local Fine Ware Production
in the Eastern Mediterranean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Norbert Kramer
Neue Märkte – Neue Techniken – Neue Produkte. Das Aussagepotential von Keramik
für die Interpretation von Akkulturations- und Innovationsprozessen in der
hellenistischen Welt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Alexandros Laftsidis
Setting a Common Table for the Hellenistic World ? Revisiting the Hellenistic
Ceramic “koine” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Susan I. Rotroff
Drinking without Handles in the Age of Alexander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Issabella Hodgson
Polychrome Mattfarbenkeramik zwischen lokaler Variation und hellenistischer Koine . . . . . . . 73
Paola Puppo
Production, Import and Consummation During the Hellenistic Period: Focus on
a Particular Cylindrical Container . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Sicily
Marco Miano
Le arule nella Sicilia di età ellenistica: il caso di Finziade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
Mariacristina Papale
Modellini fittili di imbarcazione dal centro ellenistico di Finziade: riflessioni e spunti . . . . . . 235
Alessio Toscano Raffa
“Sombreros de copa” from the Hellenistic city of Finziade: a contribution to the study
of circulation in Sicily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
Marta Venuti
Hellenistic Medallion Bowls in Sicily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
Adam Lindhagen
A Central Dalmatian Origin of the Adriatic Wine Amphorae ? New Evidence
from Xrf-analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
Boris Kavur – Martina Blečić Kavur – Branko Kirigin
The Face From the Other Side . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
Igor Borzić
Hellenistic Pottery from Kopila Hillfort’s Necropolis (Island of Korčula, Croatia) . . . . . . . . . 363
10