23 3 2024

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of workforce in Australia based on birthplace of three

different kinds of employees in the year 2003, while the line graph provides information about
the jobless rates in those types over a 10-year period.
Overall, the vast majority of workforce was accounted for by natives in the year surveyed while
the opposite was true for those born in non-English-speaking countries, except for ESC.
Additionally, there were downward trends in the percentage of unemployment in all groups
during the period shown.
Regarding the pie chart, over three-quarters of all workers in Australia were native employees,
which also outnumbered each of the percentages of the remaining categories by a ratio of
around 7:1. The gap between the second and the third ranking was minor, which the figure for
workers born in non-English-speaking countries accounted for 14%, while the remaining one
tenth of the workforce was allocated for the ESC type, securing the lowest share.
As for the line graph, workers born in English-speaking countries in Australia always experienced
the highest unemployment level over the period frame. In 1993, joblessness rate of employers
born in English-speaking countries made up 7% before plummeting significantly to 5% in 1997
and then fluctuated from 3% and 4% over the last 6 years. Similarly, the figures for the NESC
group and the Australia started at 3.5% and 4% respectively after which they both experienced
a moderate decline to the same level of 2.8% in 1995, before ending the period at 1.8% and
2.5% in that order, with the Australia always larger compared to the other.

Nowadays, with the development of social platforms, people often engage in their daily
activities, such as shopping, or banking through those networks which require them to use their
individual information. In my opinion, despite their convenience it brings, people should not put
their personal information online.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of using private information online for personal
purposes, particularly the higher living standard and friend circle expansion. Firstly, in the past,
users used to travel to a physical location for the necessary activities which allow them a
plentiful amount of time to do, such as shopping, or banking. However, most of those activities
can be completed on the Internet, giving them a large amount of time for other activities.
Secondly, the increasing use of social network sites is associated with the establishment of new
relationships. This means that people can befriend any person without any geographical
boundaries, especially foreigners on social network platforms, such as Facebook, or Instagram,
helping them find like-minded people in order to make friends and share about their life.
On the other hand, I believe that putting personal information could negatively impact on
people’s daily lives. First and foremost, nowadays, many hackers and cybercriminals exploit
security vulnerabilities of websites and applications to steal users’ information and conduct
scams. As a result, they could suffer from financial losses and relationship deterioration through
illegally accessing to their banking accounts or deceiving their family members to steal their
money. Furthermore, parties collecting individual information to streamline people’s daily
activities in the online sphere may commodify it, paving the way for illegal profiling. In other
words, they could sell for other parties who use it for promoting their products and services
through hundreds of messages and telesales, severely affecting users’ privacy.
In conclusion, while providing personal information to do some online activities could bring
several merits, I still convince that people should take into consideration when putting them
online as it still does harm than good.

You might also like