Logician INTP

What’s in This Profile?
What’s in This Profile?

This profile is designed to cover all the main aspects of Logicians’ personality as it
affects different areas of their life, including Logicians’ key strengths and weaknesses,
relationships, academic path, career and professional development, as well as their
communication and social skills, parenting tips and advice, and much, much more. It
combines personality type theory with practical, real-world advice from others who
share the Logician personality type.
Personality type has been the focus of many discussions, some of them dating back
to ancient times. It’s wise to draw from this source of knowledge and experience,
especially when unsure of how to handle a specific situation. This kind of knowledge
offers the power to control and understand oneself. As Aristotle said millennia ago,
“The hardest victory is the victory over self.” Consider this profile a plan for success.
“The Logician” (INTP, -A/-T) 2

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
What’s in This Profile? ........................................................................................................ 1
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... 3
Who Is “The Logician?” ....................................................................................................... 7
Theory Overview .............................................................................................................. 11
Five Personality Aspects .............................................................................................. 11
Mind: Introverted (I) vs. Extraverted (E) .................................................................. 11
Energy: Intuitive (N) vs. Observant (S) .................................................................... 12
Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) .......................................................................... 14
Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting (P) ..................................................................... 16
Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T) ................................................................. 17
Type Groups .................................................................................................................. 18
Roles........................................................................................................................... 19
Personal Growth .............................................................................................................. 28
Motivation and Development ..................................................................................... 30
Self-Esteem ................................................................................................................ 33
Self-Respect ............................................................................................................... 39
Self-Confidence ......................................................................................................... 45
Self-Evolution ............................................................................................................ 50
Self-Responsibility..................................................................................................... 56
Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 62

Table of Contents
Romantic Relationships ................................................................................................... 64
Potential Role Pairings ................................................................................................. 68
Logician–Analyst Relationships ............................................................................... 69
Logician–Diplomat Relationships ............................................................................ 76
Logician–Sentinel Relationships .............................................................................. 82
Logician–Explorer Relationships ............................................................................. 88
Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 93
Friendships ....................................................................................................................... 95
Logicians and Friends of Other Types ........................................................................ 97
Logician–Analyst Friendships .................................................................................. 98
Logician–Diplomat Friendships ............................................................................. 106
Logician–Sentinel Friendships ............................................................................... 112
Logician–Explorer Friendships .............................................................................. 119
Conclusion................................................................................................................... 125
Parenthood ..................................................................................................................... 127
Parenting for Each Stage of Development ............................................................... 129
Building Bonds (Birth–1½ Years) ........................................................................... 130
Testing Boundaries (1½–3 Years) .......................................................................... 134
Thirst for Knowledge (3–5 Years) .......................................................................... 138
Creating Competence (5–12 Years) ....................................................................... 143
Finding Thyself (12–18 Years) ................................................................................ 146
Conclusion................................................................................................................... 153

Table of Contents
Academic Path ................................................................................................................ 154
How Logicians Learn .................................................................................................. 155
Logicians in High School ............................................................................................ 161
Work or College?......................................................................................................... 167
Logicians in College .................................................................................................... 175
Lifelong Learning ........................................................................................................ 181
Conclusion................................................................................................................... 187
Professional Development ............................................................................................ 189
Jobs and Skill Sets ....................................................................................................... 192
Challenging Career Qualities ................................................................................. 195
Career Alternatives ................................................................................................. 197
Workplace Cooperation Between Roles................................................................... 200
Logician–Analyst Cooperation ............................................................................... 200
Logician–Diplomat Cooperation............................................................................ 207
Logician–Sentinel Cooperation.............................................................................. 213
Logician–Explorer Cooperation ............................................................................. 219
Conclusion................................................................................................................... 224
Final Words ..................................................................................................................... 226
The Puzzle of Personality .............................................................................................. 229
Five Personality Aspects ............................................................................................ 233
Mind: Introverted (I) vs. Extraverted (E) ................................................................ 233
Energy: Intuitive (N) vs. Observant (S) .................................................................. 236

Table of Contents
Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) ........................................................................ 239
Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting (P) ................................................................... 241
Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T) ............................................................... 244
Type Groups ................................................................................................................ 246
Roles......................................................................................................................... 246
Strategies ................................................................................................................. 254

Who Is “The Logician?”
Throughout this book, we’ll discuss how Logicians’ traits manifest themselves into a
complete personality type. The interactions among the traits result in a unique set of
behaviors, and we’ll examine the effects on personal growth, relationships, and
academic and professional development. The following paragraphs are a brief
overview of the Logician personality type, and subsequent chapters will explore each
area in much greater detail.
Personal Growth
Some call Logicians “philosophers” because they love theories and believe that
anything can be analyzed and improved. People with this personality type notice
patterns where others don’t, making them insightful observers. They aren’t as
concerned with the mundane aspects of life or practical things – from Logicians’
perspective, they’re far less exciting than intellectual exploration.
These types love discussing their ideas with other people, but they’re also perfectly
capable of conducting full-blown debates in their own heads. In fact, their constant
thinking process can make them seem somewhat pensive and detached. Ever

analytical, they rarely show a middle ground: Most people either find them
mysteriously appealing or completely inscrutable.
Logicians’ ability to assimilate and apply knowledge is often their most prized asset,
the source of much of their sense of self-regard. They may appear dreamy, but not
because their minds are resting – Logicians take great pleasure in using their mental
abilities. For a personality type so easily absorbed in new concepts, consistency and
dedication can be challenging, but when they turn their inquisitive objectivity on
themselves, their potential for personal growth is tremendous. Logicians can grow
by learning to take their ideas from theory into reality through focused action.
Friends, Family, and Relationships
When it comes to relationships, Logicians often have room to develop their
connections and form new ones. They find the expression of empathy far more
difficult than intellectuality, so establishing significant personal connections can be a
slow, occasionally clumsy process. Although they experience rich feelings, Logicians
don’t instinctively share them with others. If they can develop comfort and skill with
handling emotions, then they can find balance, allowing both mind and heart to
flourish.
Of course, their unique tendencies have positive virtues as well, so it’s important for
Logicians to find people who appreciate the rational framework they bring to their
personal relationships. The vagaries of emotion can be exhausting for many people,
but Logicians’ rational ideals cut right through such chaos to find and share coherent,
uplifting truth. Friends, family, and romantic partners find these individuals to be
sincere and thoughtful, having spent a lot of time refining their philosophy of what’s
important in life. As friends, lovers, and parents, Logicians turn their desire for

understanding toward creating beneficial relationships. They may not often focus on
sentimental, emotional rituals, but they care very much about the people who are
close to them.
Academic and Professional Development
When Logicians find something that interests them, they dive in. Their readiness to
explore new information is an important part of their development, and it carries
them through their education and into successful careers. If anything, they may grow
frustrated when they outpace their environment, ready for a new challenge while
everyone else struggles to catch up.
People with this personality type may also have difficulty explaining their thoughts
to other people, such as teachers or coworkers. Logicians have few limits when it
comes to theoretical riddles, but they may skip over details needed to fully
understand or carry out their ideas. If the topic is interesting enough, these types can
obsess day and night, trying to come up with solutions to questions or problems.
However, they aren’t so fond of routine work – they would rather tackle a theoretical
challenge than implement a hands-on fix.
Despite their intellectual vigor, Logicians can be shy about initially meeting other
people in the classroom or on the job. When they have opportunities to talk about
their interests with other people, however, they usually develop good working
relationships. Logicians are flexible in nearly all situations, but when others criticize
their beliefs or conclusions, they argue tirelessly. People with this personality type
put forth detailed and nuanced ideas in any field where they feel comfortable.
Classmates and coworkers alike usually find them interesting, at the very least.

On That Note …
This introduction has provided only a brief outline of Logicians’ potential strengths
and weaknesses. In the following chapters, we’ll discuss those areas in much greater
detail, as well as provide suggestions and resources for improvement.
Understanding one’s personality type is incredibly valuable, and we hope that the
following information proves useful.
But before we dig in too much there, we’ll do a brief overview of our theoretical
framework. The full explanation and some history are in the appendix – The Puzzle
of Personality. You can also skip straight to Personal Growth if you’re already familiar
with our framework.

Theory Overview
Theory Overview
Five Personality Aspects
Mind: Introverted (I) vs. Extraverted (E)
Exploring the World Within and Without
People have long noted that some among them are more outgoing and comfortable
interacting with their surroundings, and others are more at ease remaining in quiet
solitude with their thoughts. You can see the two types in almost any home, office,
or classroom. In our first scale, we focus on the difference between Introversion and
Extraversion, which we call the Mind scale.
The Mind scale describes how we see and approach the outside world, including
people, objects, and activities within it. There are significant links between this scale
and things like willingness to volunteer, boredom, thrill seeking, motivation, and
romantic assertiveness, to name just a few. The links may not prove one causes the
other. However, it does hint at a relationship.
Introvert basics:
• More internal: Introverts ground themselves more easily in solitude and
derive energy from their own thoughts.
• More selective: Introverts are careful when choosing the people with whom
they spend time and prefer a quieter environment when they have a choice.
• Slow to offer opinions: Within reason, Introverts like a little time to process
their thoughts and ideas and are slow to offer opinions, fearing they may be
too rash.

Theory Overview
Extravert basics:
• More outgoing: Extraverts tend to be outgoing both socially and in their
willingness to interact with new and interesting environments.
• Energetic: Extraverts have an energy that is almost replenished by its
expression. They are energized by being energetic and putting themselves in
stimulating situations.
• Quick with opinions: Extraverts are generally more comfortable with a flurry
of opinions that typically are a part of casual conversations. It’s almost like
brainstorming ideas on the spot while saving the editing for later.
For types with the Introverted trait, socializing depletes internal energy reserves
quickly, and when that happens, they want to return to their home base to recharge.
Logicians are Introverted: usually self-sufficient, more at home with ideas than
people, comfortable with a few close friends, and minimally involved in what’s
happening around them.
These aren’t black-and-white, unchangeable traits, but typical consequences of their
personality type. For instance, Logicians can hone their social skills and become
experts in negotiation or small talk, but they would develop these skills out of
necessity, not because they find them natural or exciting.
Energy: Intuitive (N) vs. Observant (S)
Mind and Matter
The second scale in our model is called Energy and addresses Intuitive and Observant
styles. Each trait determines what kind of information we focus on and how it is used.
It’s the foundation on which all the other approaches are built.

Theory Overview
All personality types include either those who favor the Intuitive style or those who
prefer the Observant style. But before we start, it’s important to say that this has
nothing to do with how they take in information. The word “Observant” might suggest
it does. But Intuitive and Observant types use their five senses in the same way.
Rather than how they absorb information, these qualities show how each of these
traits manages it once it’s received.
When all is said and done, Intuitive types tend to believe in novelty, in having an open
mind, and in never-ending improvement.
Intuitive basics:
• Focus on ideas: Intuitive people are fascinated by the world of ideas and love
to discover the connections between various concepts and realities.
• Are deeply curious: Within the realm of ideas, Intuitive individuals have a
strong curiosity that leads them to somewhat adventurous discoveries.
• Highly imaginative: Those who prefer this trait typically stretch concepts to
include possibilities beyond the obvious. “What if this not only means… but
what if it could also mean…”
Observant basics:
• A practical focus: Observant people are more in touch with the concrete
world and work within it. They favor consistent actions and measurable
results.
• Facts over theory: These individuals leave theorizing and brainstorming to
others, preferring to effectively apply established facts.

Theory Overview
• More in the moment: While Observant individuals have a respect for the past
and the future, they see them through the lens of what they can do now. The
task at hand is always the most important.
Logicians have the Intuitive trait, meaning they spend far more time engaging in
various internal discussions than observing things around them. People with the
Intuitive trait focus on diverse possibilities and different points of view. Logicians
aren’t that concerned about what is happening – they focus on what might happen,
or why something has happened. Intuitive types practice this throughout their lives,
making them bright, imaginative thinkers.
Focus on novelty and change comes at a cost: With all their mental resources toward
possibilities and the future, Logicians inevitably miss things in the present moment.
Dealing with practical matters or data, such as managing large collections of facts,
can cause problems for types who fixate on implications more than absolutes. This
trait can also lead to difficulties finding a partner – as most of the population have
the Observant trait, those with the Intuitive trait like Logicians often struggle with
forming social connections.
Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)
Two Kinds of Logic
The Thinking and Feeling traits determine how we decide matters and cope with
emotions. While we all have feelings, there are significant differences in how we react
to them and what role those feelings play in our lives. This then influences several
other areas, mostly related to our interactions with other people. This is what our
third trait, Nature, focuses on.

Theory Overview
Thinking basics:
• Rational and objective: Thinking individuals are most comfortable dealing
with things that come from rational thought and involve proven principles.
• Logic over feelings: While these types often feel quite deeply, they typically
place their rationality and logic above any emotional responses.
• Constantly assessing: Thinking people constantly scan ideas and actions to
decide whether they make sense or not. They can be valuable in any process
that requires any level of critical thinking.
Feeling basics:
• Lead from the heart: Feeling types listen to their feelings, care about how
others feel, and are unafraid of sharing this perspective.
• Focus on morals and ethics: People and their welfare are usually prioritized
above any other consideration with the individuals who exhibit the Feeling
trait.
• A different kind of rationality: While the Feeling type’s way of choosing a
direction may not always be totally objective, that doesn’t mean that they lack
rationality. There is practical wisdom in including feelings and consideration
for the well-being of oneself and others in the decisions one makes.
Logicians have the Thinking trait. These types trust and prioritize logic, and they rely
on rational arguments over emotional appeals. They try to keep their true feelings
and emotions deep below the surface and focus instead on what can be assessed,
compared, and verified.
Individuals with the Thinking trait, like Logicians, bring tremendous value to
enterprises that need careful assessment and calculation to succeed. Unfortunately,

Theory Overview
for all the good it represents, the Thinking trait may distance Logicians from much of
the population, as connecting at an emotional level takes more effort for these
intellectual types.
Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting (P)
The Methodical and the Spontaneous
The Tactics scale – Judging and Prospecting – is about how people plan and deal with
the options they have. But this definition doesn’t just concern what individuals write
in their day planners. It’s much broader. These traits answer questions like, “Do you
prefer spontaneity or certainty?” “Do you feel more comfortable acting only with all
your ducks lined neatly in a row? Or does a certain amount of flexibility or chaos
excite you and prove motivating?” “Do you need more choices or fewer?”
At its core, this scale determines our attitude toward certainty and structure in our
lives, both at mental and physical levels.
Judging basics:
• Predictability rules: Judging types are most at home when there is a clear-
cut, well-considered plan that provides sure steps and promotes certain
outcomes.
• Work hard: Judging individuals tend to work hard, perhaps seeing strong
effort as a way of ensuring predictability.
• By the book: Individuals with this trait usually like to do things by the book
and respect reasonable protocols, established techniques, and duties. They
sometimes see doing things any other way as “reinventing the wheel.”

Theory Overview
Prospecting basics:
• Relaxed spontaneity: Prospecting types tend to deal with life and all its
opportunities as it comes at them.
• Creative: This trait can promote “coloring outside the lines.” This can lead to
discovering new creative solutions.
• Serial passions: Prospecting individuals may find themselves passing quickly
through many interests in their lives. Because of these experiences, they can
possess a broad array of knowledge and ideas.
Logicians are Prospecting individuals, meaning they tend to look for different ways
to complete tasks or accomplish goals. Logicians’ vast range of interests may lead to
unfinished projects or missed deadlines, but these types would rather risk
disappointing others than lock themselves into a position where existing
commitments would limit their freedom.
Partly because of their Prospecting trait, Logicians tend to be removed from the real
world, often paying far more attention to their latest mental exercise than to clutter
around the house or dishes piled in the sink. Prospecting types tend to be more
relaxed about their work or studies, refusing to get stressed about deadlines,
templates, or rules when they still have free time.
Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T)
The Influence of Self-Assurance
Assertive and Turbulent – the Identity scale – measures how confident one is and
how that confidence influences all other traits. The degree that people move more
boldly or more timidly affects the way they make choices. It determines how they

Theory Overview
express their skills. Whether one is too confident to accept criticism or puts too much
weight on the criticism of others because they lack self-confidence can make a major
difference. The caution or lack of caution people apply to the things they do can color
everything.
Assertive basics:
• Confident style: People with the Assertive identity are self-confident and
resist stress.
• Often success-oriented: Because these individuals don’t spend hours
fretting, it might be assumed they aren’t interested in results. For many of
them, nothing could be further from the truth.
• Responsive and proactive: Assertive people may jump into a task quickly, not
being as burdened with the need to think endlessly about what may go wrong.
Turbulent basics:
• Useful worry: Turbulent people often worry and engage in self-doubt. While
that might sound negative, the flipside of the coin is that it fuels much of their
drive and productivity.
• Driven to succeed and improve: Turbulent individuals are constantly seeking
to do better and be better. This pushes them to put great effort into life.
• Problem spotters: Because of their cautious nature and tendency to worry,
those with the Turbulent trait often spot problems early and are able to
contain them quickly.
Type Groups
Now you know what each type consists of. But how do they fit together?

Theory Overview
In our system, we group personality types in two different ways:
• Roles determine our goals, interests, and preferred activities.
• Strategies reflect our preferred ways of doing things and achieving our goals.
You can think of Roles and Strategies as two ways of organizing personality types into
categories. These two categorization methods each highlight different facets of the
types. For examples, Roles can show us why certain types share similar interests, and
Strategies can explain why certain types approach socializing the way they do.
We discuss Strategies in depth in the appendix, The Puzzle of Personality. With that in
mind, let’s explore the importance of Roles.
Roles
The types within a given Role share similar worldviews.
There are four Roles, each of which groups together four personality types.
• The Analyst Role includes Architects, Logicians, Commanders, and Debaters.
• The Diplomat Role includes Advocates, Mediators, Protagonists, and
Campaigners.
• The Sentinel Role includes Logisticians, Defenders, Executives, and Consuls.
• The Explorer Role includes Virtuosos, Adventurers, Entrepreneurs, and
Entertainers.
So, why do we organize the types in this way? To put it simply, Roles help us to
recognize important common ground between personality types.

Theory Overview
The types within each Role all share the same Energy trait – either Intuitive or
Observant. As you might remember, this trait is incredibly important because it
determines how we view the world. As a result, the types within a given Role are alike
in a very important respect: they share similar ways of understanding the world and
their place within it.
In addition to the Energy trait, the types within a given Role also share the same
Nature trait (Thinking or Feeling) or the same Tactics trait (Judging or Prospecting).
Does this seem like information overload? If so, don’t worry. To help you get a better
grasp of the Roles, let’s go through them one by one and find out what makes them
tick.
Analysts
Analysts see the world as a system to be improved.
Shared traits: Intuitive and Thinking
The personality types in the Analyst Role – Architects, Logicians, Commanders, and
Debaters – are known for their irreverent curiosity. Thanks to the Intuitive trait, these
types are rarely satisfied with the status quo. Instead, they’ll go deep in their search
for ways to make things better, more efficient, and more effective. Meanwhile, the
Thinking trait means that they value rationality over emotionality.
Analysts’ greatest strengths include:
• Driven to learn. Analysts want to know how the world works. In their quest
for knowledge, they push the boundaries of their understanding. The result?
Their expertise in certain areas can be remarkable.

Theory Overview
• Questioning natures. Analysts rarely accept things at face value. Ever
questioning, they look beyond superficial appearances. This enables them to
come up with deep, unexpected insights.
• Intellectual energy. Full of fresh, counterintuitive ideas, Analysts know how
to spark a lively debate. Conversations with these candid, sharp-witted types
can be a breath of fresh air.
• Born to improve. Analysts are relentless self-improvers. Once they’ve
recognized a flaw, they apply all their rationality, imagination, and ambition to
make it right.
Analysts’ forceful imaginations, when trained and focused, enable them to achieve
incredible results. But, like anyone, these types can have their Achilles heels, such as:
• Lost in thought. Thinking up great ideas gives Analysts a rush. As a result,
they’re at risk of staying in the realm of thought, never acting out their ideas.
• Ever the critic. In the same vein, some Analysts are more comfortable
thinking about and critiquing other people’s work than jumping into the fray
themselves. In time, these types may be frustrated to find themselves
outpaced by people with real-world experience.
• Hunting for flaws. If taken too far, Analysts desire for improvement can have
them hunting down the flaws in everything. As a result, they may undervalue
the people and opportunities they encounter.
• Emoti-what? Analysts feel more comfortable in the realm of thought than the
messy world of emotions. But like anyone, they need to develop emotional
literacy in order to deepen their relationships and fully understand
themselves.

Theory Overview
Fortunately, Analysts have enough creativity and ambition to move beyond these
stumbling blocks. When they take action, look for the positive, and train their
curiosity on the realm of emotions, these types can grow into their full potential.
Diplomats
Diplomats see the world as a beautiful mystery.
Shared traits: Intuitive and Feeling
Diplomats – Advocates, Mediators, Protagonists, and Campaigners – tend to be
warm, caring, and generous. Bringing together the Intuitive and Feeling traits, they
shine in their understanding of emotions – both their own and other people’s. This
ability helps them excel when it comes to diplomacy, counseling others, and
communication in general.
Diplomats’ gifts and talents include:
• Emotional literacy. Even when it’s far from obvious, Diplomats can often
perceive how others are feeling. From the outside, this might look like mind-
reading. But in truth, it’s a combination of self-reflection and radical
compassion that helps Diplomats understand others’ emotional states.
• Only connect. Diplomats don’t use their people skills to manipulate others.
Instead, they aim to nurture genuine connections with the people they
encounter. Moreover, many Diplomats feel called to serve others however
they can.
• Do no harm. Deep down, Diplomats want what’s best for everyone. For them,
causing someone else distress would feel like a wound to their own psyche. As

Theory Overview
a result, these types aim to promote cooperation and harmony rather than
conflict.
• Creators at work. Profoundly creative, Diplomats are always on the hunt for
inspiration. Whether or not they take up artistic pursuits, these types tend to
enjoy self-exploration and self-expression.
Diplomats have high ideals. For them, kindness and altruism burn as brightly as a fire
on a chilly winter’s night. But if left unchecked, this idealism can have its downsides,
including:
• Impractical magic. Tempering passion with cold practicality is a challenge for
Diplomats. These types are often reluctant to make tough decisions –
especially if those decisions require them to compromise on their ideals or
hurt someone’s feelings.
• Beautiful ideas. Diplomats have the best of intentions, and they have
countless ideas about ways to help people. They’re at risk, however, of staying
stuck in the realm of ideas instead of taking action and sticking to a plan.
• Taking on too much. In their efforts to make a difference, Diplomats may
overcommit themselves – emotionally, physically, or even financially. If they
don’t deliver everything they’d hoped, they may feel overwhelmed or
disappointed in themselves.
• Easily hurt. Sensitive to criticism and rejection, these types may react strongly
if other people question the value of their ideals. Disagreement and conflict
can leave Diplomats feeling discouraged and hurt.
In all their actions, Diplomats crave a sense of meaning and purpose. Specifically,
they feel called to cultivate positive change and gentle beauty in the world around

Theory Overview
them. Motivated by intangible rewards felt in the heart and soul, these types have a
conviction to serve the greater good.
Sentinels
Sentinels see the world as a place where hard work is its own reward.
Shared traits: Observant and Judging
Sentinels – Logisticians, Defenders, Executives, and Consuls – are cooperative and
practical. This grounded approach helps them feel comfortable with themselves just
as they are. Steadfast and hardworking, these types pride themselves on their
character and competence.
Here are some of the ways that Sentinels contribute to their homes, workplaces,
social circles, and beyond:
• Loving duty. These types feel a deep responsibility for those they care about.
Specifically, Sentinels feel duty-bound to keep their loved ones safe and to help
them lead good lives.
• Always on time. Sure, Sentinels might occasionally fall behind schedule. But
most of the time, they pride themselves on being unfailingly reliable. As a
result, friends, loved ones, and coworkers can trust that Sentinels won’t flake
on their commitments.
• Keepers of tradition. Sentinels work hard to maintain the ways things are
done. In their home life, this means they love to continue family traditions. At
the workplace, these types keep track of and defend best practices.
• Unwavering diligence. Sentinels aren’t afraid of hard work. On a daily basis,
they practice their virtues of consistency and persistence, refusing to take

Theory Overview
shortcuts or stop before their work is done. And in situations where someone
needs to step up and take responsibility, Sentinels can be counted on to come
through.
Sentinels feel bolstered by having reliable people in their lives, and they make it a
priority to hold up their end of the bargain. But even these dependable types can
have their challenges, including:
• Resistance to change. For Sentinels, trying new ways of doing things can feel
wrong – almost like breaking an unwritten set of rules. These types can be
skeptical of change, and they may stick with suboptimal choices on the
grounds of “that’s how it’s always been done.”
• Stubbornness toward others. Similarly, Sentinels may feel personally
affronted when other people upset the status quo. What someone else might
describe as “experimenting with new ideas” may seem reckless or
disrespectful to Sentinels. As a result, these types might dig in their heels, even
if that means forestalling progress.
• Imposing their values. Sentinels love to give advice and shepherd people
toward better lives – at least, what Sentinels consider better lives. It may be
hard for these types to accept that not everyone holds stability, tradition, and
respectability among their core values. And when other people don’t follow
their advice, Sentinels may want to judge them harshly.
Sentinels’ loyalty and steadfastness shine in many situations. When they balance
their firm convictions with curiosity and openness, these types can become nothing
short of inspirations to the people in their lives.

Theory Overview
Explorers
Explorers see the world as an ever-ready adventure.
Shared traits: Observant and Prospecting
Explorers – Virtuosos, Adventurers, Entrepreneurs, and Entertainers – are self-reliant
and quick-thinking. They’re always ready to tackle a challenge or act on the spur of
the moment. This spontaneity doesn’t only help them solve problems – it also
enables them to find opportunities for enjoyment in their everyday lives.
Here are a few of Explorers’ notable strengths:
• Surfing the waves. Many people struggle with change, but not Explorers.
These types can adapt to new situations with minimal regret or second-
guessing. In fact, they often enjoy change and appreciate breaks from routine.
• Socially dynamic. Because of their openness, many Explorers enjoy meeting
new people and trying out new social experiences. This helps them to build a
network of diverse and interesting friends and acquaintances.
• Getting things done. Explorers don’t overthink things. Instead, they leap into
action and get the job done. These types spend their energy on taking concrete
steps, only pausing to consider abstract ideas or nitty-gritty details when it’s
absolutely necessary.
• Picking up techniques. Utilitarian in their way, Explorers love to master new
tools and techniques. Whatever their hobbies and passions, these types enjoy
the challenge of building their skills and picking up new ways of doing things.

Theory Overview
Explorers enjoy being free of obligations, where they can indulge themselves or their
interests on their own time. Like most traits, this has its upsides and its downsides.
Here are some tendencies that Explorers may need to counteract:
• Losing interest. We all lose interest in our activities from time to time. But
Explorers often run out of motivation as soon as a project no longer feels fun,
novel, or exciting.
• What planning? Explorers prefer to deal with challenges on the fly rather than
plan ahead. Alas, sometimes an ounce of planning really is worth a pound of
cure.
• Risky business. Explorers are drawn to pleasure, risk, and – sometimes – risky
pleasures. As they grow and mature, however, they often learn that some risks
simply aren’t worth taking.
Explorers connect with the world in a way that’s almost childlike in its wonder and
sheer fun. It can be a challenge for them to work for things with a distant or
unexciting payoff, but when they harness their passion and administer just enough
self-discipline, they can move heaven and earth.

Personal Growth
Personal Growth
Exploring Possibility
By its very nature, personal growth isn’t the “one size fits all” affair that some self-
help books would indicate. Personal growth is about expanding beyond comfort and
habit to explore new ways of existing. When Logicians recognize the need to grow,
they can start by establishing a baseline of their current function in the world,
evaluating the efficiency of their behavior and whether it’s fulfilling. With an objective
look inward, these types may find ideas for improvement, and then try new actions
and attitudes to help accomplish them.
Personal growth isn’t always the product of deliberate effort. Sometimes it emerges
gently from the subtle shifts caused by age and maturity. Sometimes life prompts
growth through hard times and crises. Logicians possess a wonderful enthusiasm for
critical experimentation, and when they use this ability to inspire and manage their
own growth, life’s inevitable changes are likely to be positive rather than random. As
the old saying goes, “You’re either getting better, or you’re getting worse. There’s no
staying the same.”

Personal Growth
Living from the Inside Out
For those with the Logician personality type, personal growth often involves
connecting their internal experience with the outer world. To make progress, they
may need some orientation tool to help them recognize the right way to go – a sort
of map or landmark – as well as the mindset to stay on track. Living their lives more
internally may prevent them from connecting with life’s important landmarks, which
are external to their thoughts. Personal growth starts with understanding their
unique challenges in this area.
These types’ Introverted trait leads to reclusiveness, their Intuitive trait reflects
expansive imagination, their Thinking trait manifests as constant analysis, and their
Prospecting trait is all about nonconformist, inquisitive thinking. These traits form
the “perfect storm” for Logicians to inhabit curious, imaginative mindsets. Although
this has many rewards, these individuals often become lost in their interior lives,
failing to carry their grand ideas to fruition or fully connect with other people. Luckily,
Logicians are seekers of truth, which can enable them to balance these tendencies.
Dealing with the World Beyond
Whatever their internal natures, these types must contend with the outside world.
Their lives are often unusual when measured against society’s standards and social
practices, and they can be happy outside the flow of conventional society.
Nonetheless, for practical reasons – such as maintaining a job, getting support from
others, or gaining fresh perspectives – it’s crucial for Logicians to dive into
conventional social environments now and then. Personal growth helps them invest
socially without losing the powerful material that’s the product of their inner lives.

Personal Growth
They needn’t abandon their unique style to engage the world, as thoughtful
adaptation is their specialty.
Logicians are easily capable of expanding their comfort zones to add positive
qualities to their lives – they just need to experience the merits of such attempts.
They may require some rational reason for the expansion of their status quo; though
openly curious, they value logic and often hold strong opinions. Moving forward with
personal growth isn’t necessarily at the expense of core values or an attempt to
change their intrinsic personality – in fact, it adds to both. To this end, we’ll look at
personal growth through the lens of five motivational qualities, each an important
step to progress for these types.
Motivation and Development

Logicians can consider personal growth in five closely related, but distinct, areas. The
first three relate to the internal development of self-regard, and the latter two are
more about tactics to engage more fulfilling lives.
Motivation
• Self-esteem speaks to how much Logicians like themselves. Accepting both
their flaws and strengths creates a base of internal appreciation that enables
change motivated by desire instead of shame.
• Self-respect speaks to their sense of worth. People with this personality type
value rational logic, and when they live their beliefs and values, a balanced
sense of pride in who they are follows.

Personal Growth
• Self-confidence is the energy source that moves Logicians forward in life.
When belief in their abilities is confirmed using their skills, Logicians are driven
to make steady progress.
Development
• Self-evolution describes processes of conscious growth that Logicians take
on to realize their potential. Knowing when to assess and expand themselves
enhances their abilities and happiness.
• Self-responsibility is taking charge of their lives by accepting accountability
for what they can do to improve things. Being conscious of their behavior and
direction in life helps them guide their own progress instead of letting fate
dictate a path.
Attending to each of these five areas can promote successful, fulfilling lives, while a
lack of attention can serve as the source of persistent difficulty. For example, when
Logicians (and many other types) feel a lack of self-respect, they may engage in
intellectually aggressive behaviors that compensate for their insecurity – not often a
path to objective learning and growth.
Prone to being profoundly imaginative and occasionally frivolous, Logicians can ask
themselves whether they’re approaching their lives in balanced ways that create real
growth. People with this personality type thrive on theory, and their mental
gymnastics enable incredible creativity, deep introspection, and detailed ideas on
how to accomplish almost anything. One of their biggest challenges, however, is
patiently taking step-by-step actions to implement their ideas and goals. These types
have such an expansive perspective that they often lose focus on what’s in front of
them, which can slow their intellectual and emotional advancement.

Personal Growth
This isn’t to say that Logicians should ever feel bad about who they are – quite the
opposite. For these types, personal growth isn’t about conforming to external
mandates, but rather working to achieve whatever progress is desired. Regardless of
where the journey starts, every step forward represents a new place and a success
unto itself. Life should be filled with joy, and Logicians can decide for themselves
where their paths should lead. From achieving traditional success in the form of great
careers and happy families to trotting the globe as solitary poets, they explore their
hearts and minds in relation to the world.
Moving Forward
Conscious personal growth is about more than feeling obligated to change. When
inspired, these types to seek new ways to be happier and more successful – including
an independent and personal definition of success. The goal is to spur their inner
drive with ideas, encouragement, and gentle guidance for possible problems along
the way.
In the following sections, we first examine Logicians’ characteristics in their most
beneficial forms. Using these motivational components in “balanced” ways helps
Logicians lead fulfilling, productive, and happy lives.
Next, we describe “unbalanced” tendencies that can emerge – departures from
healthy, productive motivation strategies. We also explain some adverse effects
Logicians may experience as a result.
Finally, we discuss what Logicians can do to improve or “rebalance” each of the
motivational components, and provide exercises, reflection, and actions to aid in
personal growth and development.

Personal Growth
Self-Esteem
It’s surprisingly common for rational people to struggle to reconcile emotion and
memory with their intellect. Yet Logicians who maintain firm connections to their
sense of emotional harmony also create strength in the higher functions of their
beings. Internal conflict inhibits happy and inspired lives, while self-appreciation is a
state from which all good things can grow.
Balanced Self-Esteem
Exploring Their Interior Landscape
Logicians are inquisitive and observant, and one of the ways they create balanced
self-esteem is by being aware of their feelings instead of merely being subject to
them. People with this personality type understand the value of examining things in
detail; keeping an eye on their inner workings helps them stay in tune with life in
general. When they look at their feelings honestly, they can let go of negative self-
perceptions and see how their humanity underpins their intellectuality in wonderful
ways.
The benefits of this work toward balance aren’t just internal. Self-esteem is an
inwardly felt harmony that tends to radiate outward. When Logicians feel happy with
their inner lives, they feel secure enough to also rebalance many potentially
troublesome behaviors. Those with healthy self-esteem won’t diminish others to
elevate themselves, nor will they tolerate being treated unfairly, for example. The
harmony that’s grounded within flows out to positively affect all areas of life, making
self-esteem an important step in personal growth.

Personal Growth
Believing in the Value of the Mind
Logicians also develop their sense of self-esteem when they use their agile minds to
figure things out. They tend to draw connections quickly and think creatively.
Recognizing and using these qualities throughout their lives builds an ever-increasing
sense of self-value. For a type that values intellectuality, being creative is the ultimate
self-affirmation, giving Logicians the sense of being “sources” of good things, in
addition to having clever perceptions.
Accomplishment and success typically start with ideas, and Logicians’ self-esteem
rely on their ability to come up with them; they feel good about the condition of their
minds, as well as their hearts. This stems from an appreciation of their fertile
imaginations, as well as the knowledge that they can use their power to make their
lives better.
Unbalanced Self-Esteem
Dismissing Feelings
Among Logicians’ virtues is the marvelous ability to explore, but they choose where
to focus their attention – and they often discount uncomfortable feelings to focus on
what they consider more worthy pursuits. Such disregard for their feelings results in
unbalanced self-esteem because it creates inherent dishonesty. Like all types,
Logicians benefit from internal housecleaning, but they’re asking for trouble when
they simply sweep emotions under the rug.
Even when tightly restrained, the same petty jealousies, fiery passions, and irrational
fears that plague others also exist within Logicians. They may try to divest themselves
of emotion to safeguard against the destructive elements of their personalities, but

Personal Growth
emotions also have many beneficial effects: they motivate action, help inform
compassionate decisions, and even prevent morally questionable behavior.
It’s easy to understand why Logicians might seek self-regard through intellectual
rather than emotional means – feelings can be confusing and daunting, especially for
a personality type that so respects and seeks to embody reason. However, those who
deny the complete makeup of their being – both mind and heart – often suffer.
Without facing messy, annoyingly subjective feelings that are part of the human
experience, Logicians can’t make peace with themselves.
Protective Pedestals
Sometimes these types tend to believe that what happens in their heads is more
legitimate than what happens in the real world. But their inner, theoretical world
becomes unbalanced when Logicians attempt to validate their self-esteem by
dismissing external contributions and assuming they don’t need help figuring things
out. Even worse, they may become so enamored with these mental constructs that
they refuse to test them through real-world practices, preferring to keep their
thought experiments untainted by contradictory facts. When Logicians choose
speculation over experience, they’re building their sense of pride on a shaky
foundation.
Even worse, Logicians may begin to believe only their own hype, placing their ideas
and solutions high above the opinions of others, as well as tangible evidence. These
types create a cycle of adversarial relations with the outside world when they seek to
elevate themselves in this way. Even when they’re right, any self-esteem built at the
expense of a fair exchange with others is dependent on an external conquest, and

Personal Growth
such relative gains are impermanent at best. Logicians risk a crushing downfall of
self-esteem if undeniable facts knock them off their pedestal.
Rebalancing Self-Esteem
Embracing a Complete View of Self
Logicians can revitalize their self-esteem by getting in touch with their feelings,
accepting emotions rather than sweeping them aside. Becoming comfortable with
their feelings may take time, but Logicians can capitalize on the flexibility that often
comes easily to them. Their archetypical non-judgmental style can be an asset when
it comes to rebalancing self-esteem: When their emotions become a source of shame
or frustration, they can forgive themselves with the knowledge that everyone has
dark moments, and then move on.
Although they tend to approach things with airy intellectualism, this mindset rarely
leads Logicians to such vital challenges as exploring their softer side. To rebalance
their connection with their emotions, a simple, unstructured, and private approach
may help them overcome any hesitation.
The following brief self-review exercise is a low-pressure way these types can learn
to be okay with their everyday feelings and balance their self-esteem. It’s best done
once per day, if possible, and it’s very important to perform the steps at a time and
place such as in the shower or in bed (or other good places to think quietly for a few
moments) when other matters won’t pull attention away. Use an external reminder,
if it’ll help – a note on the bathroom mirror, for example.
• Envision the following categories:
o Unhappy self-regard

Personal Growth
o Happy self-regard
o Unhappy expression
o Happy expression
• Think back over the day and recall a moment of self-criticism, self-judgement,
or self-doubt. Tag it as “unhappy self-regard.”
• Do the same for a moment of deep yet fair satisfaction with yourself, and
mentally tag it as “happy self-regard.”
• Think of an instance of a negative expression toward others – impatience,
criticism, disdain, even if justified or nonverbal. File it under “unhappy
expression.”
• Recall an example of a positive emotional expression, such as a laugh or kind
word shared with someone. Label that as a “happy expression.”
• Don’t worry if there doesn’t seem to be an event to correspond to each of the
four categories – just recall what’s available and proceed.
• Think over these selected memories. Rather than view the feelings and
expressions as right or wrong, look at them as a simply part of the brain’s
function and, therefore, as much a part of the body as skin. For example,
affronts produce irritated emotional responses in the brain, just as the skin
might become irritated by a contaminant – they are mechanisms like any
other.
• Without self-judgement, consider how the events influenced the day. What
helped or hindered personal goals, progress, and motivation? If you couldn’t
recall an event in all four categories, why not?
• If this exercise reveals an appealing opportunity to do something differently
the following day, end the review process with some constructive and

Personal Growth
optimistic contemplation on how you can adjust your thoughts and actions
tomorrow.
Logicians can feel good about themselves without profound effort, but regularly
accessing their emotions in healthy ways may require consistency. Luckily, the
regular practice of positive feelings often starts to feel like a reward rather than an
obligation.
Acknowledging Value and Merit
The problem with building self-esteem through opposition to others is that it
unrealistically assumes constant superiority. Instead, Logicians can use their
hallmark analytical skills to consider worthy wisdom from outside, even if it reshapes
their existing understanding – a wonderful thing for anyone who truly values truth
and knowledge. Logicians can create balanced self-esteem when they accept that
their worth is based not only on what they know, but also on their ability to keep
learning.
They can also be aware that intellectual triumph doesn’t necessarily keep knowledge
flowing. It’s important to consider how external facts and opinions have contributed
to better understanding. People with this personality type can remind themselves
that everything they know was once new information to them, taught or learned from
outside their own minds. These realizations can help Logicians moderate their
arrogance and stay open to contrasting ideas without harm to their self-esteem. To
stay in touch with their inner wealth without losing touch with what the world has
yet to teach, they can try the following.
• Pause whenever a new fact, experience, or conversation updates or advances
current knowledge.

Personal Growth
• Consciously acknowledge that the change – and the benefit – came from an
outside source.
• When new information contradicts a personal belief, take a moment to think
about what’s more valuable: the ego boost from displaying knowledge, or the
mind’s elevation that comes from learning new things.
• Show appreciation for the source of this new information. If it’s a book, give it
a quick positive review online; if it’s a person, nod, smile thoughtfully, and
thank them.
Self-esteem always comes into play when Logicians compare their own mental
output to others, but it doesn’t need to be dependent on such comparisons. When
they see how their ability to be flexible and absorb knowledge affirms their mental
strength, it creates happiness instead of conflict, as well as self-esteem that stands
on its own internal foundation.
Self-Respect
Self-respect develops when Logicians discover their own principles and ideas. Since
they’re seekers by nature, such things are often fluid for Logicians, as the ongoing
process of personal growth reveals new goals and ideas about how they want to be.
But Logicians aren’t craven or immoral in their goal-setting: Whatever shifts may
happen, they almost always have underlying principles to guide them.
Balanced Self-Respect
Independent Thinkers
Although Logicians benefit from being open to the contributions of others, they tend
to respect themselves most when they also express a degree of independence. They

Personal Growth
don’t feel nearly as validated when something is spoon-fed to them or when they
walk the paths others heavily trod first. However, Logicians naturally practice self-
respect when exchanging contributions with others and constructively sharing what
they know.
Such healthy expressions of independence may lead them down the “road less
traveled,” introducing Logicians to fresh perspectives and perhaps even
revolutionary ideas. Finding a balance between discovering and engaging their own
truth not only creates self-respect, but it also allows them to focus on living their lives
usefully. Rather than reinventing the wheel, they happily roll with existing ideas into
new territory. When they recognize their contributions to their lives and the world
around them, they perceive their own value.
Enterprise
As rewarding as ideas can be, they remain only theory until they’re put into action –
and any initial action may be an amateur effort. Logicians create balanced self-
respect by accepting their work as a process, and that developing enduring, valuable
skills may feel slow or clumsy at first. These types have a keen ability to adapt to their
environment and get what they want from life, and can find balance when they
employ rational planning as well as deft thinking.
When people with this personality type balance thought and action, they create more
than just ideas; it’s as if their minds become so full that new realities must emerge.
Such inspiration can take on almost any fashion; they love to experiment and see
where their efforts take them. When Logicians accomplish something, especially
something new, they see the active side of their imaginations, and that’s something
they can respect deeply in themselves. Whether it’s replacing a faucet, learning to

Personal Growth
play the piano, or writing a blog post, Logicians’ self-respect grows with every
accomplishment.
Unbalanced Self-Respect
Down with Everything
Pride in their intellectualism becomes damaging when Logicians act arrogantly
around those who don’t seem to share their reasoning ability. Those seeking a
stronger sense of self-respect may excessively disdain others – or even the necessary
structures that support their lives. This is especially likely to be true if they’re bucking
systems that don’t fit with their intellectual framework or put unwanted pressure on
them. Self-respect becomes unbalanced when it precludes all else but the internal
and creates a negative worldview.
When Logicians take their rejection of conformity to an extreme, they may become
incompatible with generally accepted ideas and mores, harming their professional
and personal lives. If something doesn’t make sense to them, they may refuse to fall
in line, especially if they perceive the situation demands dependence. Logicians may
take rebellious tendencies much too far to recapture their sense of independence;
such an adversarial stance can destroy many opportunities for effecting change
through communication and participation.
Drowning in Ideas
Fertile minds don’t necessarily produce usable results. Logicians may delude
themselves by being perfectly satisfied to endlessly refine theories without ever
testing them, but dreaming without creating doesn’t lead to balanced self-respect.
Though they aren’t incapable of the initial effort to implement their ideas, they may

Personal Growth
become bored with the consistency required to achieve their lofty pursuits. Such
failure to recognize the value of a full process – start to finish – may leave them awash
in a sea of ideas, never grabbing hold of one long enough to see it through to fruition.
Over time, a mounting collection of unfinished projects, half-met commitments, and
unrealized dreams can harm their sense of self-respect. Even if Logicians are just
following their instincts, the outside world may not forgive inconsistency or lack of
follow-through on important matters. Such critical contrasts aren’t lost on this
perceptive personality type, and they may feel bad about themselves as a result.
Unfortunately, this reaction is itself an unbalanced attitude, which can sap Logicians’
motivation even more.
Rebalancing Self-Respect
Finding Opportunities
Rebalancing extreme independence that offers no creative or practical advancement
involves Logicians’ learning to accept “healthy opportunism.” From a rational
perspective, they don’t have to accept or agree with an organization’s principles or
conventions to benefit from them. These types tend to blanch when requests offend
their rational values. Going along anyway to advance more practical interests may
feel self-serving, but it’s a logical process that isn’t necessarily a bad thing, if any
benefit is honestly gained.
People frequently acquiesce to things they don’t entirely agree with to reasonably
meet their needs. In a sense, it’s simply a matter of compromise and adaptation –
both of which are Logician strengths. While they may need to reframe such
paradigms imaginatively to justify entering them, this falls well within their skill set,

Personal Growth
and their curiosity can provide crucial motivation. Independence is good. Hunger due
to excessive independence isn’t so good.
When Logicians feel like marching in the opposite direction of something, they can
attempt the following instead.
• Try it. Sometimes the depth of possible benefit isn’t apparent from the outside.
For example, a long line may seem like a waste of time when hungry, but
maybe that food truck’s tacos really are worth it. Similarly, spending some time
in a boring entry-level position may eventually reap a rewarding, meaningful
career promotion.
• Embrace sincerity. The goal is rational experimentation, and sometimes the
best experience comes from full immersion.
• Measure the benefit. Logicians are among the most objective types. Use this
mindset to find personal benefits inside something that was initially dismissed
as pointless.
• Consider the costs. If external pressure exists to engage something, what’s the
harm in not doing so? For example, walking away from a taco truck has low
stakes, but speaking out critically at work might throw a career into jeopardy.
Logicians may want to do some mental math not just on potential gains, but
on risks as well.
• Prove it. If something seems certain, whether ideal or non-viable, be sure
before taking it up as a banner. Only research and empirical experimentation
can reveal the truth.
Logicians needn’t compromise their beliefs, but self-respect can still allow for
participation in the world’s many systems and structures. They may even find it
moves life forward.

Personal Growth
Sowing the Seeds of Success
Logicians may never feel comfortable with structure or a repetitious grind, but when
they see and feel how the power of their accomplishments can enhance their lives,
they may find reason to rebalance unrestrained thoughts with some action. Benefit
can be a key motivating factor – a rational mind recognizes the importance of self-
preservation as a prerequisite for other endeavors. For example, Logicians may
perform well at work out of a need for income, if not always passion for the job.
For people whose minds tend to roam as loftily, as freely, and in as many directions
as a bird, maintaining commitments can be a source of healthy self-respect. Logicians
can also take pride in accomplishment with hands-on pursuits, practicing the skills of
consistent effort and dedication with something that pleases them. It needn’t be
something on a grand scale, as higher stakes may inhibit rather than inspire effort.
Even a small project can represent a major shift to an Intuitive type sensitive to
symbolism, and then grow into a solid affirmation of self-respect.
Here is an exercise to practice follow-through.
• Come up with one small idea to make life happier. (For example, prettying up
an apartment with a small potted plant.)
• Decide how long to do it. A month is a good suggestion, but, of course, some
things have inherent limits. (The plant example could go on for years, but it
could also be given away as a gift.)
• Get the thing and start doing it immediately. Delay serves little purpose.
• Set a realistic, consistent schedule. (In our example, water, prune, and feed the
plant as experts recommend.)

Personal Growth
• Use a calendar or reminder app to stay on track. Remember, this is to practice
the skill of dedication. The project itself is just a vehicle for personal growth.
• Tell close friends, family, and loved ones about the project. See if one of them
will act as a “wingman.”
• Share progress reports with your wingman. Periodic updates and feedback
give added motivation. (“My plant is blooming!”)
• Stick to the plan, focusing on the good things it brings. (“Isn’t that plant looking
pretty and healthy in response to dedicated efforts?”)
Logicians can create for themselves true internal motivation to make consistent
effort, and they can accord themselves respect for whatever they accomplish. Self-
respect shouldn’t be dependent on doing what others want, but it flourishes when
Logicians do what they know is right for themselves.
Self-Confidence
Derived from the concepts of self-esteem and self-respect, self-confidence is the
energy to maintain positive self-views in the face of the world’s challenges and
eventual setbacks in life. Self-confidence allows Logicians to move forward with their
ideas and choices, rather than being held back by doubt.
Balanced Self-Confidence
Mental Strength
Logicians affirm self-confident energy by relying on their ingenuity and sense of
reason. Because they tend to live in their heads, they’re most comfortable with an
internal locus of control. But Logicians create balance by also looking outward, using
their creative minds as sources of energy to persevere against challenges and

Personal Growth
complete their goals. Logicians think that, if it’s rational, perhaps it can be done, and
exploring this relationship drives them in life. They’re fueled by concepts and
principles more than feelings.
When they take this view toward their own growth, these types can construct self-
confident paths forward in their own lives. Logicians embrace new knowledge to
reinforce their efforts, but they also draw strength from knowing they can figure
things out. They invest heavily in thought long before even considering action. In a
way, this gives them self-confidence; they can handle the unknown because they’re
ready to understand whatever may come.
Open Minds
It might seem that a personality type so reliant on internal contemplation and
rational examination might hesitate to participate in the real world, but Logicians
balance their internal experience with a willingness to experiment. Self-confidence
isn’t about certainty for these types – it’s about the lure of potential. Logicians aren’t
known for being resolute as much as keenly curious, and their willingness to try
things out, sometimes spontaneously, gives them momentum.
A willingness to engage spontaneously can keep them open to change and
improvement. Whether dealing with a social setting, work method, or entirely
unfamiliar activity, Logicians find that imagination gives them the energy to do things
– they’re always interested to see where a whim takes them and what they can learn.
Such curiosity can easily overcome doubt, hesitation, or lethargy. When Logicians
credit themselves with the chance to succeed, they embody balanced self-
confidence.

Personal Growth
Unbalanced Self-Confidence
When Things Make No Sense
Logicians’ self-confidence may suffer in realms outside of the rational. They tend to
lose motivation in areas of life where logic reveals little, and they may feel stymied
when situations can’t be assessed through some rational construct. One example:
Even when people adopt the healthiest lifestyle habits, they can get sick anyway.
Nobody can control fate or force others to think a certain way, and this can make
Logicians feel powerless.
Deep emotions also sometimes seem irrational to Logicians when the reasons
behind them don’t always make immediate sense, defying their inquisitive
rationality. During times when it becomes apparent that their intellect is ineffective,
Logicians may feel lost and upset. Realizing that they can’t control or predict the
course of emotions can feel destabilizing to people who so prize rational
contemplation. Without restoring balance, they can easily lose their energy.
The “What-If” Trap
The other side of Logicians’ open-minded imagination is an ability to see nearly
infinite potential stretching in every direction. Such openness becomes unbalanced
when it causes a kind of bewilderment that saps their energy – entranced by
perception itself, they observe rather than engage. Instead of being motivated to
explore potential, Logicians get lost among the “what-ifs.” It’s as if these types talk
themselves out of “doing,” not necessarily because they fear failure, but because
perpetual searching becomes addictive.

Personal Growth
When a sharp mind sees so many options that decisions become hard to make,
balanced self-confidence is hard to maintain. Logicians may struggle to move
forward confidently when they can’t muster commitment to any direction – one path
becomes lost among many. In daily life, this kind of indecision can wreak havoc; they
may lose their enthusiasm, becoming passive receptors of life instead of happy,
confident explorers.
Rebalancing Self-Confidence
Peace of Mind
The Serenity Prayer encourages people to accept what they can’t change, to change
what they can, and to know the difference between the two. Such peaceful thinking
can help Logicians gain perspective when they’re unable to master things through
pure logic. Coming to grips with the fact that not everything can be fully understood
– and that not everything needs understanding – helps Logicians rebalance their self-
confidence and regain their motivation.
When they accept that some factors are beyond their control, they may find they’re
more resourceful than they thought, which gives them the energy to move forward.
Logicians don’t favor tight structure for their lives, and they can recognize that the
world also holds many vagaries – hiding from or decrying them won’t eliminate such
factors, but Logicians excel at overcoming through adaptation. To help mentally
rebuild self-confidence, they can try this simple affirmation exercise.
• Write a list of things that are desired (better income, a joyful relationship,
earning a degree).
• At the top of the list, write an “I will”–style phrase in personal words, something
along the lines of, “With my mind and practice, I will…”

Personal Growth
• Put the affirmation and the items together into a mantra: “With my mind and
practice, I will… be a better bass player (be a happier person, get As, or
whatever).”
• Keep the list at your bedside. Upon waking each morning, say each item
silently three times with sincere intent and focus.
• Don’t let doubt, cynicism, or self-criticism tinge the recitation. Allow a calm but
happy sense of confidence to fill the words, creating energy for the day.
• Imagine the happiness and satisfaction that can come from achieving the
goals, then carry that excited, optimistic feeling throughout the day.
What may seem like a silly exercise can inspire very real change in the brain – these
feelings can be encouraged through practice, including self-confident energy. When
Logicians tap into their sense of hope for the future, their motivation remains strong
despite all the things they may not have mastered yet.
Jumping into Life
One of the essential ways Logicians can rebalance a lack of energy to move forward
is to practice the skill of persistence. This quality is separate from the personality
traits because it comes not from a sense of obligation or structure, but of personal
desire. When they turn their inquisitive logic inward to ask what they truly want from
life, that thirst can be used as self-confident energy to make it happen. And, once a
process has been started, reconnecting with that initial desire can rebalance
Logicians’ tendency to falter midway through.
Their lack of rigidity can also be turned into an advantage to progress. In the pursuit
of their desires, they’re unlikely to get stuck in a rut, and they can constantly alter
their angle of attack. Sometimes changing approaches is the best way to prevent

Personal Growth
stalling – no points are awarded in life for adhering to something ineffective. Of
course, new approaches don’t mean abandoning goals, but rather reinventing how
to achieve them.
The best time to practice self-confidence is today – here are some steps Logicians
can take to do just that.
• Pick an unexplored personal interest, preferably related to the active practice
of a skill or ability (math, flute playing, makeup artistry, fitness).
• Find a mentor, teacher, class, or whatever authoritative source is needed to
begin.
• Book the first engagement for this week. Don’t hesitate or think of reasons to
wait.
• Do it!
• Throw as much energy and focus into it as possible and make it fun.
• Notice with pride that both skills and knowledge are growing.
• Set self-satisfaction as the bar for success instead of external judgements.
Ingenious change allows Logicians to renew their choice of paths, rather than stray
from them. Bypassing life’s rich experiences due to doubt or distraction – or even
simple disaffection – might be regrettable, but active engagement can result in
wisdom and happiness.
Self-Evolution
Self-evolution is the idea that Logicians can turn their love of understanding toward
their infinite personal complexity, constantly looking for ways to improve. It’s
important to note that self-evolution is about personal fulfillment. This may range

Personal Growth
from academic or financial aspirations to something as soul-satisfying as playing
piano. It may also mean developing their emotional intelligence to better understand
themselves and others. The point of self-evolution isn’t to be on an austere march
toward a single goal, but to continuously develop personal potential into reality.
Balanced Self-Evolution
Adaptive Transformation
Self-evolution is more than merely considering new perspectives. Logicians
understand that information and wisdom are only as good as how they’re applied,
and they create balance by finding and employing mechanisms that can advance
their methods and views. This ongoing process often leads them to moments of
sober reflection, but they embrace such examination as a necessary step to creating
something better.
Their fertile imagination keeps the door propped open for new thinking about
themselves. More importantly, their value of rational logic requires them to
recognize their own mistaken perceptions and adapt them – just as they strive
against ignorance around them. Recognizing opportunities to evolve doesn’t always
mean a leap of faith, though, and when Logicians change their minds or their lives,
it’s because such changes inspire them.
Looking to Others
Even as relatively cerebral Introverts, Logicians can advance through compelling
connections with others on topics that interest them. They often search far and wide
before finding a social setting where they feel truly at home, but it’s usually worth it.
Company and fun activities are wonderful, but the right social connection offers a

Personal Growth
chance for intellectual growth and exchange – worthy goals for self-evolution. These
types can accomplish a lot on their own, but even more if they accept the value of
other people.
Logicians may be the source of many great ideas, but when they explore others’
minds as well, the inspiration and refreshing perspective they find can update their
thinking, and even touch off a whole new series of ideas for them to pursue. Such
interactions breed valuable feedback on Logicians’ ideas, serving as a very real
external balancing point for their internal narratives and flow of thought. Whether
studying the habits and teachings of a great leader, or simply connecting with
someone they find personally admirable in some way, Logicians’ self-evolution
benefits when it references qualities found in others.
Unbalanced Self-Evolution
Defensive Mental Exclusion
Logicians want to understand reality, but sometimes they become wedded to their
ways, their openness to change clouded by their mastery of theory. They may even
reject ideas merely because they’re too divergent from their preferred ways of
thinking. Without balance, their mental elasticity and sharp insights can be used to
justify subjective opinions rather than seek knowledge. Instead of inclusive self-
evolution expanding their capabilities, unbalanced intellectual self-referencing can
create stagnation.
Realizing a need for change isn’t always easy, and it can be far more comfortable
dismissing challenging metrics than evolving to meet them. Logicians can easily pick
apart anything they don’t like, choosing to question the validity of something instead
of expanding their conclusions to explore it. They may feel quite accomplished, only

Personal Growth
to find that they’re developing their minds and skills in an unbalanced echo chamber,
resulting in questionable capability in the broader world.
Disdain for Society
Social interaction can be difficult for Introverts, and Logicians often struggle to
understand its value. Their nimble minds are independent, and they don’t always feel
the same reward from social and emotional interactions that other types do.
Logicians simply may not feel like spending time around other people – and,
unfortunately, a lack of human interaction can cut off marvelous opportunities for
growth, throwing their self-evolution out of balance.
If they discount human connections as a priority, they miss the unexpected
inspiration and support that people can offer, sometimes without even realizing what
they’re missing. Intellectuality and introspection are important, but it’s unbalanced
for Logicians to prize only those things and retreat from engaging in the vast variety
of potential exchanges all around them. A brilliant mind unshared is a waste, and
Logicians who take an isolated view of self-evolution prevent their greatest growth,
including intellectual advancement.
Rebalancing Self-Evolution
Challenging Themselves
By relaxing in their search for perfection, Logicians can rebalance a tendency to
critically second-guess everything, keeping them open to changing their minds and
their lives – the very definition of self-evolution. Although confident in what they
already know, they may need to risk their ego by exposing themselves to
contradictory or ambiguous ideas if they want to grow. Logicians’ intellectually feisty

Personal Growth
mindset may tempt them to argue for what they hold dear, but balanced intellectual
growth comes from using that skill to also question – and possibly remake –
themselves.
Being willing to reconsider their conclusions is a huge asset to Logicians and doing
so can relieve a lot of stress. Arguments and questions can be illuminating, but they
can also cause friction and missed opportunities. Instead, Logicians can decide to be
ready to change when needed, increasing their knowledge from any sources they
can find. Their openness can allow true wisdom to blossom. Logicians can start by
practicing positive change voluntarily, with just a few steps.
• Instead of dismissing new views and ideas, decide to try them out. Thinking
something through isn’t enough, so begin by gathering empirical evidence to
either refute something or understand its benefits.
• Ask people for as much detail as possible. Employ constructive conversation
rather than critical dissection.
• Ask for a demonstration of how they make it work in their life and show
positive appreciation for their efforts.
• Apply their approach sincerely to test its usefulness. Keep in mind that it may
end up being a worthy, useful idea or perspective, so real effort is both fair
and wisely self-serving.
• Try it more than once – and try it under different circumstances.
• Look for ways to hybridize and adapt others’ ideas to make them personally
suitable. Personal circumstances, needs, and skills differ, so keep in mind that
it’s not a contest, it’s about searching for improvement.
Logicians find that experimentation is one of the most fulfilling practices and a
convincing way to spur self-evolution. Seeing or doing something for themselves not

Personal Growth
only satisfies their need for rational facts, it stimulates their sense of curiosity – an
excellent way to evolve their sharp minds.
A Friendly Chat
It’s worth noting that there’s nothing inherently wrong with being alone. Embracing
solitude may feel like returning home for Logicians, and a counterbalance to the
social side of life can be restorative, even necessary. Solitude need not stem from
unbalanced disdain for others – a strong mind is a wonderful refuge, but also a tool
to connect with the learning and intellectual growth that others can offer. Part of self-
evolution lies in knowing when it’s helpful to look for inspiration elsewhere as
opposed to inward.
When Logicians appreciate the value of engaging others and decide to improve that
part of their lives, little is more useful than the art of conversation. Getting words
flowing back and forth may start with small talk, but if people have something deeper
to share, it can quickly come out, especially when Logicians make them feel valued
by asking them about what they know. Creating a cycle of exchanged knowledge
feeds their minds, and good conversation is a universal starter, lubricant, and carrier
of wisdom – Logicians may even find their vocabulary expanding.
Here are some basic tips Logicians can use to get a conversation going.
• Enter or start conversations with gentle inquires – and a smile.
• Ask questions and show interest in people’s thoughts.
• Share thoughts in full detail, but don’t hold the floor very long.
• Truly listen to what others have to say in response.
• If asked questions, try to give useful, considerate answers. Share knowledge,
don’t just display it.

Personal Growth
• Allow others to have their own perspective, even if it’s disagreeable. Not every
argument needs to occur, and often something that seems initially absurd
suddenly clicks in a later round of reflection.
• Be cautious making jokes among unfamiliar people. Humor is subjective, but
polite, friendly sincerity is universally appealing.
• End exchanges with thoughtful positivity: “That’s interesting. I’ll have to think
about that!”
Logicians likely have a lot to say and opinions about everything, but the key to good
conversations is also knowing what not to say. Using their mental flexibility, Logicians
can try to observe other people and see things from their perspective. When they
gain even a little insight along those lines, communication blooms.
Self-Responsibility
This personal growth facet deals with Logicians’ decisions and what they value.
People with this personality type are capable of great passion, whether caring for
their families, excelling at their jobs, or breathing life into creative projects. However,
they don’t always prioritize their relationships to the world around them. Consciously
expanding such objectives is key to personal growth, and self-responsibility
represents both accountability and capability in Logicians’ lives.
Balanced Self-Responsibility
Jurisdiction Over Life
Logicians have a gift for dissecting concepts and events, looking both backward and
forward in time to see causes and probabilities. Blending this ability with self-
responsibility gives them influence over the events in their lives because they can

Personal Growth
choose how they act and react. Logicians are perceptive, but as they aren’t the only
actors in the game of life, predicting the future isn’t always possible. People with this
personality type achieve balance when they use their abilities to adapt to whatever
happens and still press forward with their own goals.
This can mean different things depending on the situation, and it’s more of an attitude
of ownership rather than a specific course of action. For Logicians, being self-
responsible means using whatever knowledge and power they have to the greatest
possible benefit rather than just pointing fingers. True greatness – and personal
growth – isn’t really a measure of ability, but how that ability is used. When Logicians
claim accountability for their lives, they empower themselves to create a better
future.
Graceful Acceptance
Logicians sometimes come up against upsetting things and people. Acceptance isn’t
always easy for people who so love to argue their many insights, yet it’s often the
most functional solution available. Logicians balance their reaction to seemingly
outrageous things by recognizing that self-responsibility doesn’t require them to
speak out. Knowing when to accept that which they can’t or need not change allows
Logicians to put their energy toward more productive efforts.
They may have to work harder than most to shake off their frustration with external
things, but making ongoing effort leads them toward balanced self-responsibility.
They see the value of moving forward – after all, they have better use for their heads
than beating them against a wall. When they accept circumstances, a calmer state of
mind often enables solutions, and when they accept other people, they find
unexpected cooperation that enhances their lives.

Personal Growth
Unbalanced Self-Responsibility
Denial
Logicians can often see how things work in complex detail. This can be a virtue when
they’re feeling creative, but when they experience misfortune or dissatisfaction, their
analytical tendencies can lead them into blameful dissection, tearing apart anything
that offends them. It’s all too easy for such a perceptive personality type to ladle out
criticism when it seems so clear how things went wrong, yet they may never look
inward for any personal responsibility.
Unfortunately, Logicians’ tendency to express anger toward any perceived
inadequacy – be it a mechanism, method, or another person – only serves to create
frustration, no matter how legitimate their complaints. When these types focus on
blame, they consume energy that could otherwise be used to move forward. And,
not seeing any culpability in themselves can also convince them that they don’t have
the responsibility – or power – to remedy the situation.
Intolerance
It’s understandable for these types to be frustrated – their keen perceptions see the
myriad problems that are part of everyday reality. However, harshly criticizing
everything they see as “broken” is an unbalanced overreach. It’s simply unrealistic to
expect everything to be the way they think it should be, and holding such opinions
can embitter them. When Logicians let their righteous indignation get out of hand,
they may exhaust themselves with the stress of constant outrage and argument.
Allowing such an attitude to persist not only threatens Logicians’ happiness and
health, but it can also be hurtful to others, damaging personal and professional

Personal Growth
relationships. Self-responsibility certainly includes speaking the truth, but they may
mistake this for the right to judge others when they think they see a better way. They
can struggle to be permissive, often putting them at odds with people in their lives
and the world around them.
Rebalancing Self-Responsibility
Taking Responsibility for Their Lives
Life presents nearly infinite opportunities to criticize – the world is full of flaws and
flawed people. However, blame is a wasteful way for these capable and creative types
to use their energy. Instead, Logicians can take responsibility by not only adapting
gracefully to circumstances, but also by accepting their own involvement. There’s
great value in rooting out the cause of any problem, but once it’s found, self-
responsibility is a gesture of power because it claims an ability to effect change.
Self-responsibility also means learning from problems with an eye toward preventing
them in the future. Logicians might accurately fault external causes for certain issues,
but such events can also provide lessons if they embrace their skills of inquisitive
rationality, as well as their freedom to choose a better destiny. When something goes
wrong in life, they can use the following steps to help turn their energy toward
progress instead of blame.
• What happened? Before assigning blame, seek answers with a cool, analytical
mindset. Truth may come to light and provide a useful perspective.
o Go over the chain of events to uncover the details of what happened.
Ask other people for their take on events.
o If the root problem can be identified, see if it can be fixed. Seek the
counsel of trusted, respected friends and family.

Personal Growth
o Map things out on paper, if needed, using cause-and-effect logic.
• Be forgiving. Inanimate objects can’t give apologies, and people can’t undo
history. Forgiveness benefits those who give it. Stress and anger make life
miserable and do real physical and mental harm. Patience is a rational
investment in personal health.
• Move forward. Feelings of blame don’t always go away quickly, but staying
focused on progressive action is helpful.
• Elevate others. Instead of pointing out how people are wrong, respectfully
offer them mentorship – and be graceful if they decline.
The above are rational steps, but sometimes frustration and desire to blame can be
raw. In this case, Logicians can consider a classic tool that any type can use to release
emotion.
• Let it all out in writing. Writing a letter that’s never meant to be read can
release blame without harm. Write an unrestrained rant to the source of the
problem and then burn it – literally light it on fire – and repeat as much as
desired. Let the act of composing and expressing thoughts and feelings create
a sense of personal validation, but then let them go and move on to happiness
and progress.
Logicians create balanced self-responsibility by examining how they can improve
things instead of blaming themselves, others, or circumstances.
Permissiveness
Tolerance and acceptance can seem like flimsy concepts to Logicians confronting
offensive ideas. However, practicing positive concepts can counter the frustration
that often drains Logicians and pushes other people away. One way to do this is to

Personal Growth
use one of their greatest strengths – inquisitive examination. Although
understanding doesn’t guarantee appreciation, when these types take a rational and
objective look, they potentially reveal hidden facets that balance their viewpoint. As
adaptable as Logicians are, this mindset is within their reach.
This practice is about emotional self-control as well as logic, but calm reason is at the
core. Logicians can decide to embrace open curiosity, putting aside prejudice in favor
of balanced reflection. Many things this imaginative personality type may rail against
are conceptual or distant, with little direct bearing on their own lives, so constantly
waging intellectual battles may accomplish little. Here’s an exercise they can use to
practice tolerance that may require a little planning in advance.
• Enter a social situation antithetical to personal opinions and decide to
withhold judgement or thought. (A progressive atheist could sit in the back of
an orthodox religious service, for example).
• Quietly listen and absorb for 10 to 15 minutes, or longer if the subject proves
interesting.
• Allow internal judgement (intolerance), but simply observe it instead of delving
into it – collect the facts, not the feelings.
• It’s important to respect and allow emotions, even while rebalancing them. If
emotions like anger or frustration come up, feel them for five seconds, and
then refocus.
• Try and find an upside, even if it’s not personally applicable. What are its
positive points? How does it benefit people? Why do people like it?
• Go home (or somewhere private and peaceful), tally up the positives and
negatives, and see if they make the topic more acceptable.

Personal Growth
• Realize that the objectionable thing will always be there – but that it’s a matter
of self-responsibility to focus on it or not.
• Take this idea into everyday life: Where to place attention and energy is a
personal choice.
There’s no magic bullet with which Logicians can fight their own upset feelings.
However, being right isn’t always enough to make them happy. Sometimes victory
lies in knowing which battles can’t be won, which battles can result in a pyrrhic victory
won at too great a cost, and how to avoid a life of battle in the first place.
Conclusion
Pearls of Wisdom
Logicians have an unsurpassed ability to understand life in all its intricacies, giving
them a wonderful capacity for personal growth. No other type sees more angles,
rational paths, or possibilities in every moment. When they set their sights on
improving and expanding themselves, it’s as if the future opens infinitely, the world
truly becoming their oyster. Wise Logicians don’t see self-evolution as an obligation,
but an opportunity – even a joy.
If they have one common roadblock to overcome, it’s the intricate palaces they build
in their minds. Logicians use their imagination and mental abilities to craft visions so
rich they seem to fulfill many of their intellectual needs. However, as with any
Intuitive type, knowing when to get out of their heads is often the first step on the
road to personal growth. When they balance their highly imaginative mentality with
realistic assessments and follow-up action, their perspective is both creative and
effective.

Personal Growth
Stepping into that external world can be daunting on many levels, whether it’s daring
to turn dreams into reality, learning to master social situations, or maintaining
personal drive despite life’s frustrations. Luckily, Logicians are unabashedly curious,
equally able to explore hidden corners of their own emotions and to expand their
skills in the wider world. When they work to build their harmony, they find the
confidence to dive into life in search of wisdom.

Romantic Relationships
On the surface, Logicians seem quiet and bookish, and they may think of themselves
as clueless about love, or even disinterested in love entirely. However, digging a little
deeper reveals an endlessly curious type, with a mind full of deeply pondered-upon
inquiries and theories. When they apply that curiosity to their love life, even the
occasional emotional obliviousness can’t stop people with this personality type from
exploring and enjoying life and romance with partners who inspire them.
Open to Novelty
When it comes to romance, Logicians tend to be unconventional and refuse to put
themselves into a box. When a conversation is interesting, or when they share
interests with a date or partner, they’re enthusiastically engaged. The more unique
or mysterious someone appears to be, the more likely Logicians are to gravitate
toward them. In fact, one of their greatest fears is that a relationship will lose its
novelty.
The desire for uniqueness often leads Logicians to ignore social norms in dating. For
example, these types aren’t likely to place physical attractiveness, social status, or

communication skills high on their list of important attributes held by potential love
interests. They value rationality and wisdom instead, and they often reject people
they perceive as intellectually shallow. Logicians hope their lovers appreciate their
ideas, regardless of whether they completely understand or agree with them. Other
personality types might judge this as odd or unromantic, but as the saying goes,
different strokes for different folks.
Logicians still need more than novelty to keep them hooked. They’re reactionary
beings, meaning that they perform according to their environment. For example,
when they feel inspired to dissect their relationship, it may be because they saw a
quarrel or positive gesture between unknown lovers out in public just an hour before.
They’re also more prone to react to a favor asked of them, but they’re unlikely to take
such initiative on their own. This is why Logicians do well with significant others who
are more proactive than reactive, able to pull them from their shells or deep
ruminations with exciting plans of their own.
Thinking Deeply
Logicians are serious thinkers who naturally consider every aspect of an idea, and
sometimes such ideas are found in people. They can see the parts of people that are
curious and worth further inspection, parts that those people may not even see
themselves. When they’re at their best, Logicians can make others feel as though
they’re the most brilliant and unique in the world.
In romance, they seek intellectual reciprocity, partners who can match them in
intellectual effort. Discussing, debating, arguing – they keep Logicians’ intellectual
blades sharp and keen, and such activities help to fulfill their primary need for

novelty. They can start to feel intellectually isolated in a love affair if the only voice
they consistently hear is their own.
However, Logicians might stall their budding romances because of an over-inspired
idealization of their relationships’ potential, followed by a fear of the expectations
inherent to such monumental potential. Trying to study all the pieces to see if they
fit can turn the joyful experience of newfound love into a frigid examination. Then,
unfortunately, Logicians may withdraw from the thought of all the effort romance
may take. Risk and uncertainty are nearly always a part of love. Hearts are broken
every day. Learning to take the risk and enjoy sweethearts in the present, instead of
trying to understand and control matters of the heart, may help Logicians better
relax into romantic relationships.
Building Upon Emotional Intelligence
Although their emotions are as strong as anybody’s, Logicians aren’t emotionally
demonstrative people, and they aren’t relaxed with their feelings. Research suggests
they’re among the types least likely to feel comfortable hugging their friends or
talking about their feelings, and this extends to their significant others. They don’t
understand emotions the way Feeling types do. The unknown can be daunting for
them, especially when they try to subjugate their romantic feelings to an ill-fitting
intellectual framework.
Additionally, many Logicians struggle with certain social niceties. Small talk, the stuff
of first dates, is difficult for most of these types. They won’t always appreciate the
superficial layers of dating rituals as they strive to distinguish themselves. They
typically dislike rules and standards they regard as mere social conventions.

Furthermore, any awkward dating experiences they do have may shake their
confidence for future dates.
After a while, disappointments and discomfort may convince them to put their
romantic lives on indefinite hold. Or, they may overcompensate for their social
clumsiness by showing off their analytical prowess. Unfortunately, a brash and
cerebral sideshow may repel the people they’re dating – and anyone else within
earshot. When Logicians try too hard in social situations, they don’t always show their
best side. A string of painful failures can lead them to conclude they’re innately
inferior at dating, when the reality is more complicated.
Less Ideation, More Empathy
In relationships, these would-be lovers struggle with their desire to analyze and come
up with numerous solutions. When Logicians see emotional pain, they try to think of
novel remedies. Everything is part of a system that, if broken, just needs rethinking
or readjusting. They don’t realize that people aren’t always looking for ideas and
solutions.
Sometimes sympathy is the answer for those who want to be truly supportive.
Without sympathy, they may create a sense of emotional disconnection that can fall
hard on already hurting partners. Sympathy includes intentional listening, with a
focus on understanding rather than ideation. It’s hard for this analytical personality
type to achieve, but with focus and a desire to improve, they can find a deeper sense
of intimacy with their romantic partners.

Potential Role Pairings

Each Role contains a set of four personality types that share core characteristics and,
therefore, are similar to each other. Exploring the Roles and their potential romantic
interactions with Logicians can provide a helpful framework for navigating
relationships. However, some caution is warranted. Life is messy and full of hard
decisions. People aren’t like puzzle pieces that fit other pieces in some perfect,
predictable way. Too many variables affect all relationships.
Traits may manifest in distinct or obvious ways, but sometimes they’re a subtle
undercurrent of someone’s personality. Often traits become subdued over time, or
exaggerated, as people adapt to societal and other pressures. When considering
traits, too rigid an interpretation of another’s tendencies can confine a romantic
partner into an identity that doesn’t fit. A more reasonable goal is to discover how
traits might influence each unique person within a couple. In loving relationships,
personal conversations outdo even the most reliable personality studies.
Although the information provided here can help readers navigate relationships
better, we won’t pretend to offer exact solutions, nor predict perfect romantic
partners through personality typing alone. However, the information provided by
personality typing can be a powerful tool for romantic exploration, especially in
creating deeper understanding and meeting each other’s needs – and like any tool,
it’s best used with education, patience, and practice.

Logician–Analyst Relationships
It’s often said that “opposites attract,” as if the human heart were an emotional
magnet. If that’s true, it’s fortunate that no two people are exactly alike, even if they
share the same basic personality traits. Relationships between Logicians and other
Analysts are hardly like peering into a mirror. Rest assured that, even with their
similarities, these two types have plenty of nuances and differences to keep their
relationships exciting.
Balanced Logician–Analyst Relationships
Intellectually Stimulated
When any two Analyst types bond romantically, they favor intellectual rather than
emotional stimulation. Although this might seem to indicate a complete absence of
emotions or passion, it’s more accurate to say that their emotions and passions are
hard to see.
Neither Logicians nor their Analyst partners express their feelings easily, and they’re
likely to feel uncomfortable or disoriented in emotionally charged situations. This
may be somewhat mitigated if Logicians’ partners are Extraverts, who presumably

are more practiced in interactions with others, but even in those relationships they’ll
emphasize Thinking over Feeling. Both types appreciate frank discussion, which, in a
balanced relationship, can include discussing their feelings in clear and precise
terms; their mutual appreciation for “rational” language can extend into describing
their emotions. Together, Logicians and their Analyst partners can work around any
emotional disconnect, or reconnect, in a frank and intellectually stimulating manner.
Deep Connections and Big Ideas
Logicians and their Analyst lovers can connect deeply over stimulating conversations,
common interests, and their shared intellectual drive. Dinners together are short on
small talk and the simple accounts of each other’s days. Instead, they might share big
ideas, clever insights, and hypothetical scenarios. In fact, such couples may regard
their interactions as a refuge from the petty world they must put up with outside of
their twosomes. For Logicians, as Introverts, such shelter against a noisy, inane world
is especially welcoming.
Logicians and other Analysts in love can be loyal, responsible, and stimulating
partners, if they’re careful not to be too exacting of each other. They’ll grow together
if they take a balanced approach to their relationship by focusing on expanding their
comfort zones. It might sound obvious, but even serious Logicians and their Analyst
significant others need easy, spontaneous fun occasionally. Reminding each other of
that, through word or action, lightens some of the heaviness of expectations and
responsibility.

Unbalanced Logician–Analyst Relationships
Overly Analytical Interactions
Typically, Logicians and Analyst lovers come to their relationships with expectations;
for example, they may expect each other to always behave rationally. Both types may
make every effort to rationalize their affection, forgetting to consider that their
feelings might exist outside of their conscious understanding or control. They also
may hobble their relationship when they discover that their lovers don’t always fulfill
every item on their preconceived checklist. Because these types are so much alike,
they may need to learn to let go of the unconscious assumption that their lovers are
just a projection of themselves. Likewise, trying to create their partners in their own
image can be devastating, especially because both types define their identity by their
uniqueness.
There’s no inherent problem with intellectual rather than emotional relationships.
However, in romance, emotions can surface despite Logicians’ and their Analyst
partners’ discomfort with showing their feelings. Even these types, in all their
rationality, can still hurt each other emotionally.
These couples only make matters worse if they square off with logical arguments
rather than offering each other empathy when there’s pain. Although they may
appreciate the logic of any solutions offered, they may not always find them
satisfying. There are still pesky emotions to deal with, and fixes won’t necessarily
banish the pain. Also, they may run the risk of avoiding emotional confrontations
altogether. When it comes to emotional expression, they may harbor more than just
a sense of reservation, but actual shame, as if they’ve embarrassed themselves, and
this judgment can just as easily be wielded against their partners.

Unorganized
Organization can be problematic for Logicians and their Analyst partners. Both types
are Intuitive – preferring to think about novel, big-picture ideas and the future. But
amid their lofty ideas, who puts dinner on the table every night? Who buys the
groceries? When visionary types come together, practical matters frequently suffer
neglect. Logicians may find the philosophical concept of an organized home
interesting and worthy of some thought, but conquering the mundane chores may
not be quite as attractive. Architect or Commander partners may provide more
direction toward order, but their strong Intuitive trait still draws them to more
interesting things rather than uninspiring, everyday tasks.
It’s worth taking time to reflect on where the future may lead, but few things in life
are clear-cut. When two distinct, rational minds are part of the decision-making
process, things can become even murkier. Neither type is likely to concede to follow
their gut. Logicians and their Analyst lovers can feel utterly paralyzed when they face
situations that don’t provide enough information to predict how things will play out.
Similar problems arise when all available options are imperfect. Logicians’ free-
flowing, inspiration-based lifestyle may be stressful to their sweethearts, as well as
stressful to themselves, when they have far too many choices and no clue how to
prioritize them.
Rebalancing Logician–Analyst Relationships
Communicating Issues and Feelings
Even the most rational people have personal flaws. Logician–Analyst couples may
want to experiment with getting out of their heads occasionally and living in the here
and now. Simply appreciating a partner rather than analyzing them can strengthen

a loving relationship. People are tremendously complex, and even the most astute
Logicians may never fully understand everything about their lovers. But this is a
feature, not a bug. The strength of their relationships come when both types enjoy
each other as they are – not try to figure each other out. These rational couples may
find it helpful to give themselves permission to spend time in ambiguity, no matter
how uncomfortable that might be initially.
Analysts may have powerful insight, but their Intuition doesn’t extend to mind-
reading. Assuming too much can be hazardous; asking caring questions can be
healing. Reclusive Logicians may need some special urging or self-encouragement
here. If necessary, they might even try thinking about communicating with their
partners as “collecting data.”
Logicians with other Analysts may not be fluent in the language of the heart, but that
doesn’t mean they shouldn’t attempt to talk about their feelings. Even for Logicians
and Analysts, it is important to talk about what is bothering them. It’s too easy to step
back and analyze a situation rather than talk directly to each other. Instead of
analysis alone, Logicians can take a more proactive stance by doing the following.
• Grab a piece of a paper and write down a list of grievances.
o On this list, write down the exact issue, why it is an issue, and the best
summation of your feelings toward the issue.
o Pay attention to the feelings that appear: Sadness? Anger? Fear?
o Try to pinpoint the exact reason you are feeling these things. For
example: “I got angry about my partner lecturing me because I want
them to think I am a competent person.”
• Take the baseline sentence configured in the last step and discuss it with your
partner.

o Avoid blame; focus on progress.
▪ Is the issue one-sided?
▪ What are potential solutions? For example, commit to saying, “I

love you,” daily; express a more emotional appreciation.
• Decide upon the solution and plan from there.
When Logicians decide to take a balanced approach to expressing their emotions, it
can benefit their relationships tremendously. They no longer have to rely on mind-
reading or deal with the stress that comes from being uncertain about reasonable
emotions. Instead, they can clarify their own emotions and, in turn, help to clarify any
emotional situations with their partners.
Prioritizing Practical Needs
On a pedestrian level, systemic lists of chores and household deadlines can be
helpful in making sure these couples take care of life’s nagging details and that they
divide responsibilities fairly. Placing a higher priority on everyday tasks may not be
something that Logicians and other Analysts are eager to do. However, the overall
health of their romances may depend on it.
Analysts almost universally appreciate efficient systems, which can apply to a
household as well as anything else, with some attention and effort. However, loving
partners must commit to following through with the system regardless of more
interesting things that might compete for their attention. This can be particularly
challenging for Logicians, who can become so absorbed in their thoughts that they
forget to eat or sleep. Setting reminders for tasks that need to be done regularly,
such as taking out the trash, doing the laundry, or cleaning the bathroom, can help

to prevent inevitable arguments when the garbage is overflowing, or there’s no more
clean underwear.
Logicians should work with their Analyst lovers to develop plans that include an
agreed-upon distribution of chores. If they want to prevent resentment or bitterness,
they must not completely rely on their Analyst sweethearts to keep up the
organization of the household. No matter who sets up the organizational system,
both types need to be on the same page regarding the distribution of tasks. Here are
some tips Logicians can follow.
• Carve out 30 minutes or an hour to sit down with your partner.
• Create a weekly task list that ranks priorities and needs of the household: bills,
grocery shopping, laundry, repairs.
• Ask your partner to hold you accountable for your designated tasks, and vice
versa if needed.
• Logicians work best if they have someone who can motivate them and save
them from their boredom, so perhaps ask your partner to prod you if needed.
• Once a week is over, make note of what worked and what didn’t.
• Create a new task list based on the notes.
• Update the task list regularly! It should evolve according to both parties’ needs.
By implementing the above steps, Logicians give themselves room to evaluate their
priorities and bond with their partners in the process.

Logician–Diplomat Relationships
Logicians’ core traits are Intuitive and Thinking. Thanks to the Intuitive part of this
combination, Logicians and Diplomats share a visionary and unconventional view of
the world. Unlike most other types, they inhabit a world of ideas and abstractions.
One of the best things these two types can offer each other is the potential for
dynamic romantic relationships where their opposing traits help them to grow into
better people individually.
Balanced Logician–Diplomat Relationships
Visionaries
Because of their shared Intuitive trait, these two types transition quickly from
acquaintances to something more profound. It’s as though they recognize each other
in a way they may not be able to identify, but which nonetheless holds great
significance. Logicians see this connection in a way that creates a powerful
infatuation, which Diplomats are fully capable of reciprocating. Together, they can
create exciting new relationships, something all the more exciting given Logicians’
usually limited social circle.

On a first date, rather than fireworks and passion, Logicians and their potential
Diplomat partners might connect through logical constructs, like concepts and
theory. Although Logicians focus more on reason and rationality, and Diplomats on
humanity and values, they both love talking about big ideas, and neither has much
interest in small talk. Even with their different emphases, both Logicians and
Diplomats plant creative concepts and dreams in their mental landscapes. Chances
are good they’ll never run out of conversation material.
Aligning Altruism and Self-Interest
According to our research, Logicians are among the types least likely to say they’re
willing to sacrifice their own needs for others, whereas Diplomats are among the
most likely. Diplomats may find a calling in bolstering their Logician partners’ sense
of altruism. Diplomats’ enthusiasm for helping others and profound sense of
empathy can inspire even the most reticent Logicians to consider and adapt to the
needs of others.
On the other hand, Logicians can help their Diplomat lovers pay more attention to
their self-interest amid their idealism. Their empathy and desire to “do good” at all
costs can quickly drain Diplomat partners of their energy. Logicians can help them to
recognize and address this issue. Balancing altruism and self-interest is tricky for
Diplomats, but necessary for their health and the health of their relationships. The
gentle pull of both personality types toward a happy medium can help both find a
sensible way to make necessary sacrifices.

Unbalanced Logician–Diplomat Relationships
Unorganized Idealists
When Intuitive people cohabitate with other Intuitive people, issues with
organization can cause unexpected trouble. Logicians and Diplomats enjoy having
deep, meaningful conversations and sharing ideas and discoveries much more than
the less enjoyable tasks of paying bills, grocery shopping, and doing domestic chores.
But ignoring responsibilities usually leads to disorganization, which usually leads to
stress. With Logicians, their disinterest in practical matters can erode their
relationship satisfaction as an increasingly unpleasant physical environment
encroaches on these lovers’ abilities to function on a day-to-day level.
Logicians’ constant stream of ideas but reluctance for follow-through can poison
Diplomats’ sense of hope as they realize that nothing may ever happen. This is a
deeply personal problem for Logicians in particular, as they may come to recognize
that their lives aren’t moving forward the way they’d like. They feel, consciously or
unconsciously, the difference between their thoughts and actions. This creates
internal disgruntlement that erodes the positivity that Diplomats depend on, both
personally and in their relationships. Disgruntlement can also be misplaced: Poor life
satisfaction because of unfulfilled personal goals can be misinterpreted as a problem
with their relationship itself.
Logician–Diplomat couples may find themselves constantly rearranging their
universe by developing plans and ideas. This can be exhausting and cater to a
perpetual sense of discontent. They may have a sense that there’s always something
better. Consequently, satisfaction may be elusive, and these lovers may likely

reinforce this dissatisfaction in each other. They may both have a difficult time
savoring life lived in the present.
Emotionally Unprepared
Logicians’ focus on an idealized version of rational pragmatism can make Diplomats’
sensitivity and concern for others’ feelings seem unhelpful or even unintelligent.
Issues may arise when Diplomats want to vent about their problems. Logicians
typically jump in to offer solutions rather than express sympathy or compassion, but
when Diplomats bring problems to their Logician partners, they’re likely not looking
for action plans. They only want someone to listen to them and acknowledge their
pain.
Diplomats may misinterpret their Logician lovers’ sincere wish to help as a cold lack
of empathy, perhaps even a lack of caring. To heart-centered Diplomats, it may look
like Logicians simply want to dispatch the problem without regard for what they’re
feeling. It’s not that Logicians don’t care. It’s just that, to them, it makes more sense
to fix a problem rather than to dwell on its emotional implications. Diplomats believe
deeply in the importance of emotional implications.
Of course, this works both ways. Diplomats tend to offer empathy to Logicians who
are looking for rational solutions, not “touchy-feely” sentiments. What Diplomats
believe sounds like a warm offering of compassion may seem to Logicians a useless
irritant – and they have little trouble dismissing ways other than their own. Instead
of experiencing their sweethearts’ intended support, Logicians may instead find
themselves annoyed. Diplomats, in turn, may feel dejected when their Logician
partners don’t seem to understand their good intentions, while Logicians remain
frustrated by unwanted injections of emotionality into their problems.

Rebalancing Logician–Diplomat Relationships
Being Practical and Present
Logicians and Diplomats are likely to be “too” Intuitive, thinking so far beyond
themselves that they forget about their immediate environment. This can be
problematic because Logicians may be so focused on an idealized version of their
lives or partners that they don’t take the time to appreciate their current situation.
A little time spent appreciating the “here and now” can also help Intuitive couples
discover how enjoyable the real world in real time can be. Fun things frequently
happen in the present, outside the realm of the imagination. Finding ways to involve
the senses in activities can help ground Logician–Diplomat significant others, such as
joint cooking classes, a game of tennis or other physical activity, or mindfulness
exercises for couples. Here is one mindfulness exercise they can employ.
• Twice a week, take a walk together.
• While on the walk, pay close attention to the world around you.
o What color are the leaves? The trees? The flowers?
o What is the sky like? Clear or cloudy? Bright or overcast? Blue or some
other color?
o Is there a path you haven’t taken on your walks yet? What do you find
there?
o What is your partner wearing? What color is their hair? What about their
eyes?
▪ Of course, you’ll know basic details about these attributes in your
partner – but is there anything you haven’t seen? Is there subtlety
or nuance you may have missed before?

Without a doubt, engaging in physical activities can boost Logician–Diplomat couples’
appreciation for each other as they discover the real people they love (instead of
focusing on a conceptual construct). They don’t have to focus constantly on “what if.”
Love grows when they pay a little more attention to “what is.”
Focusing on Understanding
When their Diplomat partners come to them with complaints or problems, Logicians
may want to suppress the instinct to suggest a solution immediately, starting instead
with a validating statement – for example, “That really does sound difficult.” Active
listening is an essential tool in the world of Diplomats.
The effort indicates that Logicians are eager to receive information rather than just
provide it, leaving Diplomats with the feeling that they’ve been heard. At some point,
once Diplomats have had an opportunity to speak their feelings, it may be
appropriate for Logicians to ask whether they want some suggestions. However, they
should actively resist offering any advice until they receive the go-ahead. Here’s how
they can listen effectively.
• Eliminate all distractions – power down the cell phones, close the laptops, and
turn off the television.
• Invite your partner to speak their piece.
• Participate in the conversation with clarifying questions, while also validating
your partner’s emotions or qualms: “When you say ‘X,’ what do you mean?”
• While listening, refrain from attempts to “solve” the problem, whether in your
head or aloud. All of your attention should be on understanding what your
partner is saying in the moment, rather than jumping ahead to what they
might mean.

• Summarize aloud what your partner has said to you, to ensure that you’re both
on the same page.
• If the summary is correct, take some time to think about your response, and if
the situation calls for it, ask your partner what steps you can take as a couple
to remedy the situation.
Logicians don’t readily buy into the idea of “too much honesty,” but the idea contains
truth. Diplomats put great emphasis on sparing feelings; in fact, some may even
argue, “Do you want to be right, or do you want to be loved?” Logicians ought to
consider such a choice, especially in their love lives. Far from being an invitation to
be phony, the quotation is a way to frame reality in gentle terms. Although diplomacy
may not be Logicians’ most natural tendency, it can be learned. Being more of a small
“D” diplomat can be helpful in creating bonds, especially with capital “D” Diplomats.
Logicians may never be perfect in their interpretation, but they can practice by
getting early clarification, which reasonable partners are likely to appreciate. This
provides guidance that can help Logicians stay focused on the goal of their
conversations.
Logician–Sentinel Relationships

Sentinels have the Observant trait, so they aren’t nearly as enamored with ideas and
visions, which can seem impractical to them, much to Logicians’ dismay. Sentinels
are extremely planning-oriented – future-oriented – but that focus stays grounded
and pragmatic, as opposed to Logicians’ more timeless vision. However, when both
types work together and combine their traits, they set themselves up for mutually
beneficial romance where they can improve upon their respective weaknesses.
Balanced Logician–Sentinel Relationships
Systematic Relationship-Seekers
These two personality types are unlikely to naturally run in the same social circles,
but they may be bought together by external forces: coworkers or classmates who
come to admire each other; Logicians dragged into the dating game by friends;
Sentinels trusting friends to set them up with respectable partners. Logicians date
with an abstract intent, and if something interesting happens, they roll with it. When
they take a balanced approach, they analyze their potential relationships, finding
something attractive about Sentinels’ differing traits. That way, Logicians’ analyses
and romantic plans survive contact with reality.
Sentinels also rely on fixed qualities when looking for their life partners. However,
their requirements are unlikely to be determined by checklists they’ve developed
from pragmatic experience or upbringing. They glean the characteristics they’re
seeking from traditions they’ve known, concrete life lessons they’ve learned, and
societal expectations, as well as a tendency to seek out their own “group,” whether
political or professional. Although their criteria and methods of formulation are
distinctly different, both Logicians and Sentinels know what they’re looking for in

their lovers. However, their difference in focus is also telling of how their lives
together may unfold.
Vision Meets Practicality
Some of the dynamics of Logician–Sentinel romantic partnerships are influenced by
whether Sentinel partners have the Thinking trait or the Feeling trait. Those with the
Thinking trait may be more at home with Logicians’ analytical nature. They’re likely
to respond to their emotions in more concrete ways, and they may be more
accepting of their Logician sweethearts’ impulse to offer suggestions for their
problems. They may look for both empathy and a solution, but, in their practicality,
they’ll be content to receive only a solution.
In relationships between Logicians and Feeling Sentinels, Logicians may initially have
difficulty communicating with and understanding their partners. The two types may
not understand each other’s motivation, but both are dedicated to eventually
understanding the other’s perspective and the reasoning behind their actions.
Logicians, when deciding to understand their lovers’ need for practicality, can see
Sentinels’ actions in a new, more inspiring light.
Unbalanced Logician–Sentinel Relationships
Miscommunication
Logicians sometimes project a condescending demeanor when they believe their
rational approach is superior to others. In addition, they may enjoy considering ideas
that seem controversial to their more mainstream Sentinel partners. If Sentinels take
Logicians too seriously, they may become alarmed, offended, or possibly frustrated
because they just don’t understand where they’re coming from. On Logicians’ side,

they become frustrated when Sentinel partners don’t understand where they’re
coming from, given Logicians’ reliance on a more abstracted and broadly connected
thinking style. An assault on conventional thinking, even solely in the realm of the
theoretical, may jolt tradition-loving Sentinels.
Because of the above reactions, Logicians may see potential Sentinel lovers as
provincial in their thinking, perhaps causing them to indulge in condescension. Such
contempt can be especially hurtful for Sentinels, who are likely to put significant
effort into creating stable homes and relationships.
Logicians are always looking to deconstruct ideas and revise them with
improvements. In doing so, they may create more contention with their Sentinel
sweethearts. Logicians don’t need predictability in the same way as Sentinels, and
they’re willing to alter plans, methods, and schedules on a whim. Logicians risk great
harm to their romantic relationships when they treat them as other systems to tweak,
and even Sentinels with the Thinking trait aren’t likely to understand the mindset
behind the tinkering, to the point they might take offense. Even bringing up changes
to routine can strike discord: Sentinels may feel wounded when they sense their
values are inadequate for their Logician partners.
Absent-Minded Versus Pragmatic
Clashing over practical matters can be a regular point of contention when Intuitive
and Observant types meet. Logicians can appear absent-minded next to Sentinels’
concrete pragmatism. Although Logicians might like the idea of organization and
planning, Sentinels live it. Conflict comes when Logicians don’t marry their idealized
version of planning with reality. Such organization is core to Sentinels’ very being and

grounds them, but Logicians may shrug it off as “just not that important.” This is the
stuff of potential conflict.
The everyday accomplishments that Sentinels handle so well can easily fly below
their Logician lovers’ radar (or above their heads). Sentinels rarely ask for praise,
instead believing they’re doing what is expected of them – a baseline that everyone
should be up to. But they still appreciate acknowledgment. Like anyone, they enjoy
being complimented, and when appreciation isn’t forthcoming, they sometimes
become passive-aggressive. A lack of recognition may create significant but
unspoken pain for Sentinels. It may not entirely be an accident the next day when
their Logician partners’ toast is burnt.
Rebalancing Logician–Sentinel Relationships
Heal Thyself
Logicians and Sentinels are very distinct types. A common mistake among romantic
partners is to see their own traits as superior. Attempting to remake a significant
other into one’s own image is rarely successful. Logicians need to appreciate that
Sentinels won’t always be comfortable with their big ideas and their constant
attempts to reimagine things. Without such awareness, trying to force Sentinels to
“get it” can become a futile obsession.
However, before Logicians criticize their partners, before they become judgmental
about Sentinels falling short, they can take a hard look at whether they even meet
their own standards of open-mindedness. Have they opened themselves to the
unfamiliar ideas and approaches their partner has embraced?
For an exercise, try “going along for the ride.”

• Participate in the things your Sentinel partner does (television shows, tennis
club, drinks with friends).
• Actively seek out the good in each activity and determine whether your
preconceptions match the reality of those situations.
• Gather empirical evidence with the intent of observation, not to prove
something wrong.
With the right attitude, the differences between these types are the spices that make
their relationships more flavorful. For Logicians, this might even be reframed as an
adventurous excursion into their lovers’ world.
Action Over Musing
Logicians’ wilder theories and concepts are often just that: theories and concepts.
But when they offer vague ideas for dinner (which they then don’t prepare for), or
muse about some weekend activity (but then forget 10 minutes later, even as their
partners are logging it away in their mental calendar), their lack of follow-through
may create day-to-day frustration that erodes romance.
One solution: Logicians can seize on their inspirited nature by acting on their ideas
as soon as their sweethearts give the green light (for example, going out and picking
up ingredients right now, buying movie tickets in advance). By following through with
their initial musings immediately, Logicians can provide their partners with peace of
mind, improve their relationships, and take satisfaction in their own initiative.

Logician–Explorer Relationships
Logician–Explorer couples are Intuitive–Observant pairs with a typical divide between
a visionary way of life and a more tangible, hands-on approach. Explorers live entirely
in the present and seek out the new and the exciting. They’re curious about
everything – except long-winded discussions revolving around theoretical
abstractions like the nature of reality.
Balanced Logician–Explorer Relationships
Vision and Pragmatism
Logicians admire Explorers’ desire to master their chosen crafts and skills, and this
initial attraction can easily deepen into something more. Both Logicians and
Explorers enjoy solving things, but Logicians ponder intellectual puzzles, whereas
Explorers tend to think on their feet, unraveling real-time problems. Despite their
different styles, they have a measure of commonality in their desire to find solutions
that might easily overlap or complement each other.
If Logicians can connect their ideas to something practical and immediately useful,
they’ll impress their Explorer dates. For example, Logicians who talk about the

intricacies of learning computer code might appeal to Explorers’ appreciation of tools
and devices.
Open-Minded Meets Spontaneous
Logicians and Explorers have a mutual appreciation for novelty and adventure – with
Explorers pushing their Logician partners out the door, and Logicians adding a bit of
extra depth to the experience. The two types make for an amazing adventuring duo.
They share a spontaneity that allows them both to go along for the ride on short
notice when one or the other feels inspired. The answer to almost any suggestion is:
“Let’s do it.”
That being said, when they take a balanced approach to their romance, this
personality pair make sure to fine-tune their adventurous natures with some
grounding practices. They take care of their practical needs, knowing when to
prioritize the mundane but required parts of life over the more exciting parts.
Unbalanced Logician–Explorer Relationships
Condescending and Critical
Independent Explorers aren’t necessarily sensitive to criticism. Nonetheless,
Logicians can come across as condescending, especially when their lovers aren’t
immersed in the same lofty imaginings. Logicians may unintentionally – or even
intentionally – convey to Explorers that their practical work or contributions lack
depth or any real meaning, which can be especially troubling for insecure or less
mature Explorers.

Partners who consistently project a sense of superiority and condescension over
their loved ones can chip away at the emotional bond that holds their relationships
together. As in all relationships, loving respect is one of the keys to longevity.
Perpetually Preoccupied
Once again, household maintenance rears its head. The archetype of the absent-
minded professor is based on reality and applies to Logicians specifically.
Consequently, household chores and bills may frequently fall on Explorers’ shoulders.
However, Explorers’ preference for living in the moment may not necessarily make
them the most consistently responsible people, either.
Still, Explorers are more likely to respond to everyday concerns more quickly than
Logician partners. Clothes piled high in the middle of the bedroom floor will make
them tense far faster than the mess will bother Logicians. Chances are that Explorers
complete household tasks more often, and they’re likely to eventually grow weary of
the burden of handling such matters. Logicians aren’t the only people who want to
do more interesting things.
Rebalancing Logician–Explorer Relationships
Making Time for Understanding
Personality theory can be an effective tool for better understanding between
Logicians and Explorers. Applying what they learn about their lovers’ traits likely
feeds into Logicians’ love for the theoretical, systemic, and formulaic. Explorers, on
the other hand, may not be quite so eager to delve into the weeds of personality
theory. However, abstract concepts may bring the differences to life for them.

It’s important to suspend judgment and to remember that both approaches to life,
Logician and Explorer, are equally legitimate. In all likelihood, the initial attraction
between them came from recognizing each other’s strengths; when they share them,
their differences can provide profound opportunities for growth.
Logicians who overthink things might learn to shake off their “paralysis by analysis”
and turn ideas into accomplishments with the help of more action-oriented Explorers.
Logicians may learn to love and live more in the moment if they remain open to this
style. In return, Logicians can provide some needed foresight, planning, and
preparation for life’s more complex considerations, which might elude Explorers.
Before they judge their romantic partners, Logicians should consider the following
exercise in empathy.
• Try to imagine the perspective from your partner’s point of view.
o Visit our website and read your partner’s profile to gain a better
understanding, if you struggle to imagine your partner’s perspective.
• What stands out about your partner’s point of view? Actively identify things
your partner does that impress you.
• Try applying your partner’s perspective to your life together. What is it like?
Those steps can make Logicians more attuned to the alternate forms of intelligence
held by Explorer partners. In short, they can develop appreciation through
participation.
Motivating Each Other
On the practical side, Logician–Explorer couples may need to decide early in their
love affairs who does the laundry and pays the bills. By combining Explorers’
fondness for action and Logicians’ love of creating or improving systems, they can

deal with life’s more mundane obligations. But first, they must take the time to decide
such matters. Neither may be naturally inclined to sit down and parcel out duties,
but it is well worth the effort.
For Logicians and Explorers, this will be an irretrievably ongoing effort that’s solved
and re-solved week by week. They might offer help, recognizing that it can make their
significant others happy, or make requests, with the full intent of reciprocating when
they ask for help with something. To ensure their efforts are effective, Logicians can
take the following steps.
• Identify a necessary task involving both of you.
o This can be as straightforward as making a meal or tidying up a shared
room.
• Offer to do the task together.
• Ask your partner how you can help. Then ask to help your partner in turn.
o This help might be indirectly related to the task at hand; for instance,
putting on music or engaging in conversation during a tedious task.
Sometimes companionship is all the help people need.
What’s most important for both types is to develop long-term plans and goals
together. Explorers may be practical; however, they’re often impulsive and struggle
when considering the future ramifications of their actions. Logicians have the benefit
of connecting the dots between current actions or ideas and future consequences.
Even the more rational Explorers, with their Thinking trait, tend to “shoot first and
ask questions later,” which can cause significant problems, especially when it comes
to financial decisions. Logicians’ analytical abilities – and even their tendency to be a
bit indecisive – are beneficial in such situations. Here’s an exercise they can try.

• Carve out 15 minutes to sit down with your partner.
• Create a bullet list and title it, “Decisions to Make Together.”
• Write down at least two major decisions you must make together (for example,
spending $1,000, adopting an animal.)
• Write down at least three decisions you would prefer to make together (for
example, having company over, spending $500, changing a career.)
• Write down decisions that need not be made together (for example, what to
get for dinner, what clothes the children should wear, spending less than $250,
what movie to watch on date night.)
If Logicians and Explorers agree to make big decisions unanimously, they can temper
each other’s weaknesses. By learning in a controlled environment, these lovers have
a chance to try, make mistakes, and learn, before establishing a habit.
Conclusion
Ideating the Future
All their emphasis on rationality, logic, and knowledge doesn’t mean bookish
Logicians are robotic people incapable of romance. It’s easy to assume Thinking types,
including Logicians, lack a romantic side, as these individuals may struggle to express
their feelings in conventional ways. But nobody should assume that Logicians have
no capacity for love. They’re as capable of love as profound and wonderful as anyone
else is; their love simply dwells within them and is expressed in different ways than
people often expect. Logicians are typically creative, humorous people who can
impress potential suitors with their eloquence.

Logicians can be brilliant partners in longer relationships, particularly if they keep
alive their spark. By bending their creativity and imagination to enliven mundane
tasks and to show appreciation for their partners, Logicians shine with any type by
their side. Their ability to create and inspire, combined with their insightful
imaginations and love of novelty and spontaneity, makes Logicians appealing lovers
to all types of people.
When Logicians share themselves without shame, they may be surprised at how
attractive they are to other people. As Introverts, putting themselves forward socially
comes with great effort, but they nonetheless benefit from doing so. Accepting
themselves as people who are valued in romantic relationships can be a powerful
step toward meeting their goals of personal growth, as well as finding love.

Friendships
Friendships
Common Interests and Beyond
Logicians prefer friends who wrestle with ever-developing, complex ideas, rather
than those who enjoy small talk, superficial cheer, and gossip. Among friends, they
come out of their usual shell for lighthearted, irreverent fun, and their sometimes-
cheeky wit can blossom. For those who can keep up, these types offer storytelling,
vivid conversation, and spirited debate. Their sarcasm and dark humor tend to repel
the faint of heart – and those who struggle to understand subtle nuances – but those
who embrace Logicians enjoy their abundance of hilarity and wittiness. Friendship
with them may not be for everyone, and Logicians are generally fine with that.
The key to Logicians’ social development involves moving beyond comfortable
compatibility to sharing deeper connections with differing people. Although their
depth, creativity, and intellect are admirable, those same qualities can sometimes
shield them from genuinely bonding with others. They enjoy freedom and solitude,
but they can suffer from social disconnection and isolation. It’s crucial for Logicians
to drop their defenses occasionally if they want their relationships to grow.

Friendships
Slow Progress Leads to Solid Friendships
People with this personality type prefer just a few high-quality friendships over a
larger circle of acquaintances. They prefer relationships that need minimal day-to-
day attention, expecting to stay on good terms with their chosen few without much
maintenance. For Logicians, confidence in their friendships replaces the need for
frequent reaffirmation: Once they give their trust, they draw great comfort from
knowing that their real friends are available if needed.
With Logicians, bonds take time to develop, as they aren’t easy to get to know. They
may themselves ignore (or bungle) traditional rules of social conduct, which they hold
in lower regard than most types do. Yet they also expect others to meet certain strict
standards – and may dismiss anyone who falls short. When they do find other people
who meet their requirements, they can offer them stimulating friendship that’s likely
to stand the test of time. Logician friendship symbolizes deep respect and
appreciation they can’t always express in words, and once it is granted, they don’t
take it lightly.
Blunt but Refreshing Honesty
Although ego-stroking may be part of companionship for other personality types,
Logicians offer respect directly. Known for their blunt honesty, they sometimes share
observations without grasping the resulting impact. This might offend some people.
However, the same quality can also endear Logicians to understanding friends who
embrace honesty. In an age of gossip, false social veneers, and the worship of
appearances, Logicians’ stark honesty may be refreshing, if slightly abrasive – like a
good, exfoliating scrub.

Friendships
Logicians sometimes equate tact with manipulation, which they don’t excel at or
admire. Social jockeying and emotional games appall them. Even though theirs may
not be the softest shoulders to cry on, their sincerity earns their friends’ trust.
Appreciating life on a factual level, Logicians often serve as rational, contemplative
mirrors for their loved ones, which can be a powerful asset in times of trouble. Often
seeming above the raging waters of emotion, Logicians can lift their friends out of
such floods with calm, rational clarity.
Playing to Strengths – and More
When it comes to Logician friendship, the goal isn’t to force them into the role of
Extraverted social butterflies or to encourage them to seek nonstop heart-to-heart
encounters. That’s just not who they are. Their strengths lie elsewhere.
Logicians appreciate rationality and use it conversationally to cut through tedium and
routine; they need not abandon that in favor of more emotional parts of
relationships. Growing their friendships doesn’t require changing their essential
selves. In fact, when they try to deny their strengths, it often backfires in the long run.
Growth is about expanding a comfort zone, not abandoning it. Therefore, adding
factors to balance out their sometimes less-than-diplomatic social impulses helps
Logicians remain true to themselves while they grow as friends. The following
sections discuss multiple ways they can expand their social range.
Logicians and Friends of Other Types

Logicians have thoughtful, questioning natures, and their analytical minds help them
see the advantages of relating to different people in different ways. Let’s examine the
challenges and joys that Logicians are likely to face in friendships with other people

Friendships
belonging to each of the major Roles – Analysts, Diplomats, Sentinels, and Explorers.
We’ll look at some ways Logicians can balance their style to make their friendships
more valuable, fair, and fulfilling.
Logician–Analyst Friendships
The kinship created by their shared Intuitive and Thinking traits often mitigates
potential hindrances to Logicians’ friendships with other Analysts. Their preference
for rational approaches and passion for big ideas create the potential for powerful
camaraderie. Such camaraderie may feel like “home” to Logicians. However, having
such similarities is no guarantee of forming seamless bonds. Having friends who are
too much like mirror images can create narrow focus and reduce opportunities for
growth. Not getting too comfortable with only the familiar is essential in
development – something Logicians strive to attain.

Friendships
Balanced Logician–Analyst Friendships
A Familiar Fit
Other Analysts are often a comfortable fit for Logicians, with their shared passion for
new ideas and unconventional thought. Although such bonds often take time for
Logicians, they’re likely to form more quickly with other Analyst types. Such
camaraderie is likely to revolve more around intellectual engagement rather than
social or emotional support. Logicians are a rare personality type and may feel that
others misunderstand them, so other Analyst types – all of whom are a bit rare –
provide familiar companionship in a world that can seem foreign to their sensibilities.
Logicians’ minds constantly buzz with analyses, questions, and ideas, and few other
than Analysts can keep pace. Logician and Analyst friends can always find something
to talk about: They bounce ideas back and forth, and they both value intellectual
practices. They enjoy dissecting each other’s ideas piece by piece as an exercise. They
also are likely to engage in some friendly competition, with each challenging the
other to strengthen the logical foundation for their views – an especially valuable
practice for Logicians, who highly value logic but at times struggle to explain detailed
causation.
Landscapes of Potential
Discussions between Logicians and other Analysts are unlikely to revolve around
people, feelings, social status, or immediate plans. Instead, they tend to gravitate
toward esoteric interests. These friends may have compatible senses of humor,
making for fun and laughter as they take on the world around them. Analyst friends
let Logicians be themselves and pursue their interests with little or no inhibition –
and perhaps even a little enthusiasm.

Friendships
Logicians and Analysts also support each other well when seeking answers to life’s
problems by combining their creative resources. Each brings knowledge and
perspective to address problems or advance ideas. Between collaboration and
dialectical tug-of-wars, such collaborations can reward both types with vibrant
intellectual exploration and creative answers.
This “boosting” characteristic likely goes beyond the utilitarian development of ideas
and problem-solving. That Analyst friends “get” their Logician pals can be powerful
confirmation of their value – even if they never consciously explore or recognize that
support. Having someone who identifies with them in positive ways can mutually
reinforce both Logicians’ and Analysts’ strengths and may encourage them to aim for
their best selves.
Unbalanced Logician–Analyst Friendships
Determined Styles and Ideas
Problems can arise in Logician–Analyst friendships when their personal styles clash.
Logicians thrive in vivid realms of theory and sometimes enjoy discussing ideas more
than fulfilling them, which can frustrate distinctly goal-oriented Analyst types like
Architects and Commanders. Difficulties also may emerge when Logicians’
Introversion clashes with the more forthright style of Extraverted Commanders and
Debaters, whose forceful interaction can sometimes intimidate Logicians. Bolder
Analysts may eclipse more reserved Logicians, stifling their freedom of expression –
and creating a fertile field for resentment.
Adding to their stylistic conflicts, sharp minds don’t always agree, so when Logicians
and other Analysts differ on core issues, sparks may fly. Logicians’ Prospecting trait
helps them stay open to new information, but even these curious, discerning people

Friendships
may find themselves in dispute with Analyst friends. Doing battle with each other’s
statistics and philosophies can quickly turn from stimulating to frustrating.
Even relationships otherwise helped by shared traits can be tricky. Usually, the culprit
in such cases is inflexibility, often in the form of stubborn adherence to personal style
and ideas. Those who depend more heavily on a rational style for decision-making
may not always see the interpersonal cost of their rigid insistence. When both
personality types focus equally on “being right” over respecting others, tension can
disable otherwise viable friendship.
Intellectually Bonding, Emotionally Isolating
Expression (or lack thereof) can be difficult for Logicians with Analyst friends on more
than an intellectual level. When emotionally charged situations arise, whether issues
within their friendships or challenges in their personal lives, Logicians generally don’t
need apologies, pity, or hugs. Nor do they typically seek someone to cheer them on
or to offer them congratulations for any accomplishments. In many cases, they prefer
matter-of-fact Analyst pals who help them figure things out rationally and give them
unemotional assessments. Ultimately, however, such friends may be unable to offer
each other adequate emotional support when it’s sorely needed, or to express
happiness with them when things go well. Even the most rational people need an
emotional connection from time to time.
Logicians and other Analysts are more likely than other types to objectify matters
that need emotional intelligence. They’re prone to offering each other explanations
and solutions rather than empathy. However, they’re no more immune from life
events that assault or stimulate emotions than anyone else. They’re just as likely to
need friends to sit with them in times of distress or share in moments of joy. This

Friendships
dynamic, no matter how badly needed, may be absent among Logician–Analyst
friends, who, instead of experiencing the inevitable emotional impact of life, often try
to explain it.
Take, for example, a death in the family. People can examine and discuss death and
create many models for grieving. However, the explanations and solutions don’t
lessen the pain or the difficult adjustments to a “new normal.” Mourners must
experience grief and pass through its stages. Although grieving Logicians and
Analysts might attempt to explain their suffering away, sometimes only time and a
friendly shoulder to cry on will do.
Logicians and other Analysts need an emotional connection when it comes to
happiness and joy as well. Overanalyzing a job promotion or the arrival of a new baby
instead of just enjoying and sharing the positive feelings they elicit can dampen the
whole experience.
Rebalancing Logician–Analyst Friendships
Shifting to Greater Cooperation
Logicians can approach Analysts (or anyone) of differing mindsets as learning
opportunities instead of as threats to their own settled perspective by
subconsciously asking themselves, “What can I learn from this person? How might
their friendship be beneficial to me? How can I contribute to the value of this
exchange?” If Logicians have one undeniable passion, it’s their zeal for discovering
new ideas and points of view. Therefore, other Analysts who can shed new light on
their assumptions and advance their thinking intrigue Logicians, which potentially
provides a great foundation for friendship. Such an open method doesn’t require
Logicians to accept that which makes no sense to them. Rather, they can examine

Friendships
other Analysts’ points of view for useful insights – and respectfully coexist with others
whose opinions are different.
One excellent way for Logicians and their Analyst comrades to evolve past conflict is
through shared experimentation. These friends can support each other’s attempts
to bring ideas into reality and relish the resulting useful experience. Working with
open minds, Logicians and Analysts can shelve arguments about “ideal solutions” and
discover the facts together. Logicians love to experiment and learn, and chasing data
with friends may be doubly enjoyable, providing useful knowledge and building
stronger rapport through cooperation.
One experiment Logicians can try with someone they frequently disagree with
involves helping each other build an argument from a non-adversarial perspective.
Try the following game.
• Choose any topic to explore with a friend (preferably another Analyst if
available).
• Strike the right attitude by deciding to expand on a topic without dissenting or
taking a contrary stance. Just for this exercise, suspend disagreement. Think
of it as the opposite of a debate.
• Start with a single proposition. It can be a serious topic or not. Some examples:
“Owning pets is a form of slavery and must be abolished.” “Pineapple on pizza
isn’t appropriate.” “Artificial intelligence is a dangerous direction that puts
humans in danger.”
• Flip a coin. The player who calls it correctly is Player A.
• Set a timer for five minutes.
• Player A makes the first statement about the proposition. The first statement
can be “pro” or “con” and should be no longer than a single sentence.

Friendships
• Player B then responds by expanding on Player A’s statement. To ensure this,
their response must begin with, “Yes, and …”
• Continue developing the original response until the timer runs out.
Obviously, this game won’t test propositions to their full extent. Pushback is often
the more productive way to arrive at substantive conclusions, and testing ideas
against opposing concepts can be a powerful means of arriving at the truth. But
friendship can become exhausting if that’s all it’s about. Taking a breath and finding
a cooperative tone can help a friendship remain positive – and balance healthy
debate with a camaraderie that highlights shared opinions.
Logician–Analyst friends might further solidify their connections by finding
recreational interests where they can set aside intellectual concerns – some simple,
real-world adventure is a refreshing way to stimulate creative processes and sweep
away stress. Bike rides, basketball games, beer tastings, and similar pursuits allow
cerebral cohorts to step back from their whirling mental potential and just relax
together in the moment.
The Role of Emotional Intelligence
Logicians and other Analysts might favor Descartes’ famous quote, “I think; therefore,
I am.” But people are more than their thoughts. It’s a mistake to construct a strict
separation between rationality and emotions: The overlap is too great, and emotions
contain their own logic and usefulness. Thoughts are important, but not everything
responds to cold rationality. Dismissing emotions outright can inhibit growth.
Recognizing and nurturing the emotional side of life can fortify a friendship between
Logicians and other Analysts, helping them understand each other – and themselves.

Friendships
To build greater emotional intelligence requires being in touch with one’s own
emotions and acknowledging and respecting the emotions of others. Friendship can
strengthen both. It’s a mistake to consider these personality types as being without
feelings – they’re often not as comfortable with them, or as fluent in their expression
as other types, but their brains share the same fundamental structures as anyone
else. Learning to “speak the language,” even within such intellectual friendships, can
add positive dimensions.
Here’s a game these friends can play to raise emotional awareness.
• Gather the following equipment: a dart, a board that can receive a dart (e.g., a
cork board), Post-its or other adhesive labels.
• Write “emotion words” such as hope, trust, fear, joy, surprise, disgust, anger,
sadness, remorse, love, anticipation, and frustration on Post-its, and arrange
them on the board in any fashion. Make sure they’re far enough apart from
each other that there will be no mistaking the dart’s proximity to a word. (This
is also a great chance to play with a nuanced vocabulary.)
• Stand eight feet from the board – about the regulation distance for an official
game – and take turns throwing the dart.
• When the dart hits an emotion, the player describes a time they felt the
emotion and what they did in response to it. Avoid judging or analyzing
anything. The only goal is awareness through observation.
Emotional intelligence isn’t static. People can cultivate and increase their empathy,
mostly through awareness and a willingness to grow. The dart game can serve to
raise awareness: Logician and Analyst friends can “up their game” by realizing that
endless intellectual discussion and debate can only take them so far, then reflecting

Friendships
that in their friendship. Neither is in danger of losing their love for the rational – and
they can add much to it.
Logician–Diplomat Friendships
The common thread in Logician–Diplomat companionship is their passion for ideas
and their drive to imagine improved lives. Both bind themselves to the world as it
exists but love to explore unrealized potential. They may have dissimilar concerns –
Logicians cling to rationality, whereas Diplomats prefer compassion – but their
shared imaginative style still offers plenty of commonalities, often more than enough
to create and sustain friendship.
Balanced Logician–Diplomat Friendships
Beyond the Obvious
Logicians and Diplomats often connect when they recognize in each other the ability
to see beyond the superficial into profound, mysterious dimensions, yet they do have
differences. Diplomats view the world through the lens of human interactions and
hopeful ideals, whereas Logicians coolly consider possibilities tempered with

Friendships
statistical likelihood. Such differences won’t necessarily derail their connections.
Under the right circumstances, they can even create new shared understanding.
Logicians often find that Diplomats are full of fresh ideas. Finding new perspectives
as insightful as their own – yet distinctly different – can be refreshing. Logicians excel
at thinking about what works best using dispassionate efficiency, but Diplomats add
a humanistic dimension that brings people together for the greatest possible results.
If these friends combine their strengths, applying rationality to high ideals, they can
develop well-rounded, useful ideas.
Balancing Each Other
On a more personal level, Logicians may exchange significant qualities back and forth
with their Diplomat friends. Their logical flexibility adds a wonderful contrast to
Diplomats’ lives, offering reasoned thinking that helps them focus their passions.
Logicians are likely to witness the potent energy that lies within Diplomats’ more
idealistic perspective, helping them explore the intricate mysteries of human
interaction, leading each other to personal growth and a more expansive connection
between people who understand each other.
Efficiency without compassion is a hard, lonely thing. Compassion without rationality
meanders from one unbridled feeling to another. Friends who complement each
other in these areas are valuable companions, and much potential lies in friendships
between Logicians and Diplomats.

Friendships
Unbalanced Logician–Diplomat Friendships
Consistent Tension
Logicians often see strong emotional expressions as excessive and unrelated to truth
and logic. For them, feelings are “dealt with” rather than respected. Such a mindset
can be confusing or even offensive to Diplomats, who consider emotions crucial in
connecting with others. Their conflicting approaches to the human experience may
cause Logicians to roll their eyes and become frustrated with their Diplomat friends,
and Diplomats may question their Logician pals’ humanity.
Such differences can affect Logician–Diplomat attachment in personal ways.
Logicians have little desire to discuss their feelings, and Diplomats are likely to sense
this stone wall with regret. Diplomats’ freer emotions may strike Logicians as
unrealistic, imprudent, and just plain exhausting, and eventually they may retreat
from what seems like uncontrolled chaos. It’s akin to speaking with another person
without a shared language: Relating isn’t impossible, but some attempts end in
exasperation, and even successes may lose a lot in translation.
Sensitive Cores
Logicians and their Diplomat friends prefer harmony, but if riled, they may do more
damage to each other than ever intended. Logicians can alienate Diplomats by
delivering blunt opinions that may seem to border on ruthlessness when, in fact,
they’re often casual and based on Logicians’ observations in the moment. Their goal
isn’t to hurt Diplomats; they simply may not be tuned in to what kind of responses
might cause pain. Similarly, if Diplomats criticize Logicians’ opinions or behavior, even
in a moment of annoyance, such words may likely echo inside Logicians’ minds for a

Friendships
long time. Such “assaults” can create fissures in a friendship that eventually lead to
its total erosion.
Both lean toward sensitivity, although in different ways, and they may take
themselves too seriously. Logicians need others to honor their ideas. They don’t
necessarily want others to agree with their concepts – they gladly accept criticism
(and often enjoy it) from people they judge worthy to offer it. However, they won’t
accept someone minimizing or questioning the quality of their efforts. Although not
all Diplomats are mission-driven, they all have an underlying sense of moral virtue
that buttresses their outlooks. If either companion shows contempt for the qualities
so important to the other, they’ll offend something almost sacred to their friend,
likely resulting in grave injury to their relationship.
Rebalancing Logician–Diplomat Friendships
From Tension to Connection
Communication is the key to managing any tension that arises between Logician and
Diplomat friends. Respecting each other’s distinct style is important, but before
respect can develop, they must at least acknowledge each other’s differences.
Friendship is about connecting with other people, which rarely happens if both types
don’t listen carefully to what the other thinks, feels, needs, and wants. Until they do,
their affection for one another will remain superficial, and they’ll likely find it difficult
to sustain what they refer to as “friendship.”
Listening carefully is also a powerful means of expressing concern and validating
feelings – something all people need from relationships, especially Diplomats. It
shows them that what they have to say and what they feel are more important than
the detached mental processes going on in their Logician friends’ minds. Close

Friendships
attention to their words, feelings, and thoughts affirms Diplomats’ value and shows
Logicians’ loving regard for them. Once Diplomats recognize that Logicians are taking
them seriously, they may allow their friends to offer analyses that lead to solutions –
but the first step requires Logicians to pay attention to their pals.
One technique for developing active listening skills involves paraphrasing friends’
words to both gain and show understanding. To do this, Logicians can try the
following exercise.
• Select a fictional television show or movie, preferably one heavy with dialogue.
• Using the “pause” button on the remote, practice paraphrasing what the actors
say. Any scene can be used, but emotionally laden scenes are probably more
helpful for this exercise.
• Avoid thinking in terms of action or what the characters should do next. Limit
activity to simply translating what the characters are saying. Try to remain as
true to each character’s concern and intent as possible.
• Consider taking turns with a friend for the most instructive experience. Two
friends can “mirror” two characters by each dedicating themselves to
paraphrasing a specific character’s dialogue in a scene.
Many credit Theodore Roosevelt with the saying, “Nobody cares how much you know
until they know how much you care.” This quotation is especially valid for Logicians
in Logician–Diplomat friendships. Developing an ability to respond to feelings,
whether by learning the language of empathy or actively listening, can help Logicians
strengthen their rapport with Diplomats.

Friendships
Grasping Alternate Perspectives
Logicians and Diplomats strive for similar results: to develop and follow their ideas
about a better world. Respecting such shared values may help these friends balance
their differing approaches and their consequent sensitivities. Logicians might
encourage their Diplomat companions’ analytical abilities, helping them turn raw
idealism into realistic thinking that can help them achieve their goals. In turn,
Logicians might get in touch with the importance of their own emotional and social
health. By following the lead of their Diplomat friends, they can better understand
themselves and others in a social context.
These friendships are likely to flourish if Logicians and Diplomats honor each other’s
talents. Diplomats’ warm care can be a balm for the internal conflicts in Logicians’
minds, and the thoughtful insight and logic offered by Logicians may be a lifeline to
Diplomat friends who struggle with chaotic thinking. Most of all, the two types can
share an unending dance of inspiration, grasping different sides of an idea as they
elevate it to the heights of creativity.
To this end, Logicians can step into their Diplomats’ shoes with this exercise: WWDD?
(What Would Diplomats Do?).
• Find a news story on television, on the Internet, in a magazine, or from any
other source.
• Using what’s been discussed in this section about Diplomats, step into their
shoes for a moment and explore how they might respond to the story. How
might Diplomats react? What would be their focus? What solutions might
Intuitive, Feeling individuals come up with?

Friendships
• Take it outside of the theoretical and test it with Diplomats themselves. Check
responses with Diplomat friends.
• How might Logicians react differently? How might Logicians who are
influenced by Diplomats respond?
• What would be a balanced response that combines both Thinking and Feeling
responses?
The goal isn’t to turn Logicians into Diplomats (which is impossible, regardless).
However, both Logicians and Diplomats can expand their lives and become more
effectively responsive to their world if they adopt some of each other’s
characteristics. Remember, growth comes from expanding beyond an individual’s
comfort zone.
Logician–Sentinel Friendships
Novelist Graham Greene wrote, “Ordinary life goes on – that has saved many a man’s
reason.” The quotation describes a quality essential to Logician–Sentinel friendship.
Logicians, like all Intuitive people, are frequently dreamers of dreams. Sentinels,
however, are doers. Therefore, Logician friends can expand Sentinel thinking with

Friendships
imaginative notions, and Sentinel friends can anchor often-impulsive Logicians in the
practical. Mutual appreciation of the gifts each brings to their unique brand of
camaraderie can produce long-lasting, satisfying relationships.
Balanced Logician–Sentinel Friendships
Inspirational Perspectives
Under the right circumstances, Logicians may find that Sentinel pals complement
them well. Logicians excel at big-picture thinking and might impress Sentinels with
their insight, their compulsion to make everything work better, and their cleverness
at imagining the broader mechanics of a solution. Logicians can look to Sentinels for
practical advice on maintaining step-by-step progress, and, in turn, help Sentinels
expand the scope of their thinking.
When Logicians and Sentinels befriend each other, they don’t organize their
relationships around their different strengths; friendships are more organic. Still,
their personalities naturally influence their whole lives, including social intimacy.
Conversations between the two might involve Logicians exploring ideas that are
refreshingly novel for their Sentinel friends. Meanwhile, their Sentinel companions
anchor those ideas to reality in a casual, friendly way with questions and propositions
ranging from, “You know what would be interesting to do today?” to “The world would
be a better place if …” Also, when Sentinel friends reflect their love and respect for
family, community, and tradition, they remind Logicians how those elements add to
the general stability of life. Not all Logicians are hermits, but they tend toward
isolation. Sentinels inviting them to a family holiday dinner can balance that
inclination in healthy ways.

Friendships
Trading Mindsets
Friendship isn’t a business or an enterprise. Beyond the basic utilitarian advantages
of Logician–Sentinel companionship, their intrinsic qualities complement each other.
Logicians are intellectual wanderers, bound only by the rules of logic under the
umbrella of rationality. For them, ideas become stale and in need of revision quickly
– so their thinking is constantly in flux. They seek adventure in the imagination.
Meanwhile, stable Sentinels are happy to keep their home fires reliably burning,
metaphorically speaking. Generally, Logicians are “spontaneous thinkers,” whereas
Sentinels are “organized doers.”
Friendships rely on similarities and differences to make them captivating. Friends
must have common ground, or such relationships would remain empty of topics to
discuss or interests to pursue. Without some shared interests, no connection exists.
For Logicians and Sentinels, potential interests are plentiful, and they may even share
many of them simultaneously. But each also needs to bring something unique and
of value to their relationship. Just as they must hold similar interests, they also must
possess differences that mildly challenge and pique each other’s curiosity. In their
pronounced differences lies the opportunity for Logicians and Sentinels to bond in
powerful and interesting ways.
By questioning Sentinels’ traditional values and ideas, Logicians may shake up
Sentinels’ thinking about seemingly settled matters. This may be valuable if Logicians
are gentle enough in their challenges and make no attempt to convert their friends
to their latest ideas or opinions. Sentinels might even enjoy exploring new
perspectives on things they’ve always taken for granted. In the same vein, Logicians
are likely to benefit from the organizing and stabilizing influences of their Sentinel
pals. The purpose of friendship isn’t for companions to transform each other.

Friendships
Nonetheless, friends can be “good” for each other, and there are plenty of chances
for such growth in Logician–Sentinel friendships.
Unbalanced Logician–Sentinel Friendships
Failing to Compromise
When Logicians and Sentinels decide they like each other, it doesn’t mean they’ll
always understand each other. Their foci can be vastly different. Logicians often
enjoy bandying about in their thinking, from convoluted humor to improbable
schemes. Sentinels are likely to focus more on direct, substantial experiences, even
when it comes to something as light as friendly recreational pursuits. These buddies
may need to compromise when sharing casual time together and work hard to
expand any common ground that naturally exists between them.
On a typical night out, this can make a difference: Choosing a movie might be difficult
when Sentinels are looking for escapism or simple entertainment, but Logicians are
longing for engaging new ideas. Finding an action film or romantic flick burgeoning
with esoteric themes may not always be easy. Unwillingness to compromise is likely
to raise tensions and dampen any enthusiasm these friends have for each other.
Demanding one’s own preferences or judging those of others can create endless
conflict in any relationship. These two types have enough differences that Logicians
risk damage to their rapport if they overplay their traits to the detriment of Sentinels’
preferences.
The “Responsible” Friend
Even though friendship can be as casual as “hanging out,” it’s still a relationship, and
still susceptible to roles. When it comes to organizing and carrying out plans,

Friendships
Logicians often pale in comparison to Sentinels, who, with their dutiful attitude, may
assume the role of the “responsible” friend. This is fine if both types accept and
embrace the delineation. However, division of labor between these chums may look
like Logicians have saddled Sentinels with the mundane work – and that may even
be true. While Logicians imagine a stimulating hike through the countryside,
Sentinels may end up assembling the sandwiches, filling the canteens, and
purchasing the trail mix. Consequently, feelings of inequity may seep into their
friendship.
Sentinels don’t mind doing their part; they often insist on it. But nobody likes to do
all the heavy lifting, and it may feel that way for Sentinels in relationships where they
assume the “responsible” role. Logicians don’t take advantage of others as a rule, nor
are they purposely negligent – their focus on bigger ideas often comes at the expense
of more practical matters, however. Unless the difference is clearly communicated,
it can seem like an abdication of responsibility – especially to duty-sensitive Sentinels.
Rebalancing Logician–Sentinel Friendships
Enjoying Compromise
Logician and Sentinel friends whose opposing preferences cause conflict in their
relationships may benefit from reframing compromise. It’s undeniable that
compromise means holding onto or releasing some personal interests, and it’s
important to be assertive regarding things that truly can’t be compromised, such as
a moral position or an undeniable truth. But most choices and opinions are more
flexible and defy the need for a rigid stance. Compromise is about giving and taking,
with the goal of both self-care and generosity.

Friendships
It only takes a little imagination to see compromise as a means of creating room for
different preferences. Reframing in this manner takes the focus off “losing”
something and shifts it to enlarging one’s own experience, which potentially leads to
gains in personal growth and perhaps adds something interestingly atypical to one’s
life. Reframing can appeal to the truly curious. But, more to the point, reasonable
compromise fosters less corrosive and more giving relationships, resulting in better
companionship.
Here are the keys to compromise that Logicians and Sentinels can use to unlock new
potential in their friendships.
• Approach compromise with an open mind and a generous attitude. Otherwise,
it’s not really compromise.
• Practice active listening. Get a clear picture of what your friends want and
need.
• Divide both types’ desires into items that can be compromised on and items
that can’t. Items that can’t be compromised on should all have a clearly
indisputable quality based on an established standard of morality or reason.
They can’t simply be arbitrary preferences.
• Compromise is a matter of degrees and doesn’t always fall into “either/or”
categories. Is there a place in the middle where both types can be happy and
feel respected? When deciding on a dinner out, it doesn’t always have to be
either a Mexican restaurant or an Italian restaurant. It can be Mexican food
this week and Italian the next. It could even be a buffet that provides a variety
of ethnic foods and covers both cuisines.
• Use reframing to see compromise as a way to make room for a larger
repertoire of experience.

Friendships
When two types as different as Logicians and Sentinels become friends, compromise
is an essential tool for navigating something as simple as differences in taste and
style or as complex as overarching philosophies. Compromise can be a glass half-
empty of things lost in the process or one half-full of the things gained, depending
on these friends’ chosen attitudes.
Sharing Responsibility
When Logicians have Sentinel friends, they should consider the roles they fall into
and make sure the burden of any labor doesn’t rest exclusively on one type’s
shoulders. Just because duty is important to Sentinels doesn’t mean they should
handle it alone.
When it comes to shared responsibility and “division” of labor, Logicians are well
equipped with their ability to assess their place in relationships. It’s simply a matter
of taking an objective step back and viewing the situation dispassionately. With an
eye toward equity in their friendships and an understanding of how preferred roles
may offset this, they can evaluate how much more (or perhaps less) they need to be
responsible in their friendships.
Here’s an exercise that can help, which involves creating the “ultimate” friend.
• Consider an existing relationship you’ve observed closely in your life –
preferably a friendship.
• Now, using the strengths and contributions of each personality type involved
in that relationship, combine them to create the “ultimate” friend. Write the
description down.
• Does the “ultimate” friend look more like one or the other of the original
friends? Or is it a good combination of both people?

Friendships
• If the combination needs balancing, what actions can be taken to make it more
equitable, so that each personality type is equally represented in the “ultimate”
friend?
Ideally, friendship is a give-and-take between equals. For Logicians, this may mean
assuming more logistical responsibilities and everyday tasks. For Sentinels, this
might mean contributing more ideas or defining the nature of the relationship a bit
more assertively. Slight adjustments by both can return tremendous benefits.
Logician–Explorer Friendships
Although Logicians and Explorers are dissimilar, those who become chums share
similar energy based on spontaneity. Logicians entertain a flurry of obsessive ideas
based on theories, and Explorers seek a succession of novel things to experience.
Their Prospecting trait provides energy for both, influencing them to constantly
reboot their direction. If understood and harnessed, this quality can provide
common ground for friendship, as spontaneous thought and action come together.

Friendships
Balanced Logician–Explorer Friendships
Spontaneous Collaborators
Logician–Explorer comradeship isn’t always an instant fit, but the pairing has much
potential, especially if the individuals share interests. Logicians often struggle to let
go of compulsive analyses and simply have fun, and they can look to their Explorer
friends to help them follow their hearts (and Prospecting tendencies) with unworried
enthusiasm. Logicians can help Explorers develop a deeper perspective on the
actions they take, and they may even suggest how to do them better – “What if we
try… ?”
Therein lies the real beauty of Logician–Explorer friendships: Logicians have so many
ideas about what’s possible, and spontaneous Explorers can prompt them to act
without becoming mired in theory. If they have a common field of interest or hobby,
it gets even better. They can collaborate with their unique contributions, sharing
endless days of fun.
Beyond Obvious Usefulness
Differing types can influence personal growth for the people with whom they form
bonds. This goes beyond simple utility and obvious ways of balancing each other.
Explorers typically hate theory, yet Logicians do not doubt the value in ideas.
Logicians don’t always think about actualizing their ideas, yet Explorers may believe
that free-floating ideas without practical intent have little value beyond
entertainment. When these concerns come into play between Logicians and
Explorers, continued companionship involves subtle influences and nudging by
example.

Friendships
Both Logicians and Explorers can pick up subtle changes to their own styles that
reflect their friends’ values. Where other types might use overt, utilitarian
compromise to create harmony in their friendships, Logicians and Explorers
contribute to the gentle evolution of their companions. Speakers in the self-help field
claim that each person is a composite of the five individuals with whom they spend
the most time. People can debate the number, but it’s hard to deny the influence of
the prominent people in one’s life. Logicians aren’t likely to change Explorers into one
of their own type, or the other way around – and given the tendencies of each, neither
should try. However, that doesn’t mean that subtle, almost subliminal influence can’t
or shouldn’t be a part of personal growth.
Unbalanced Logician–Explorer Friendships
Differing Levels of Engagement
Logicians may see Explorers’ tendency to live in the present and follow their
compulsions as shortsighted, and they may disapprove of Explorers’ decision-making
in general. Their reluctance to come out of their shell and loosen up may frustrate
free-thinking Explorers, who themselves might feel that their Logician friends unfairly
judge their shifting inclinations.
In shared company, Logicians can become baffled and concerned if Explorer pals get
caught up in the emotions of the moment without taking time for critical reflection.
Logicians likely find no rational explanation from Explorers, who just move on to the
next thing before the dust settles. If Logicians spend too much time thinking without
jumping in, Explorers may simply leave them in the dust. A lack of a foundation for
communication can lead these friends to become out of sync with each other.

Friendships
Differing Levels of Sincerity
Logicians ruminate on ideas, taking their thoughts very seriously as long as they
entertain them. Explorers are much more decisive – if they don’t see something as
immediately useful, they’re likely to dismiss it quickly. Explorers may see Logicians as
taking things too seriously, and Logicians may become frustrated at what they see as
Explorers’ dismissive attitude to ideas they feel are important.
These differing attitudes may become more problematic if they extend to the nature
of their friendship. Logicians, who take companionship very seriously, may be less
casual about their connections than Explorers. Logicians don’t typically demand
much time or attention as friends, but they may sense that Explorers sometimes
have a “take it or leave it” attitude about even the important things in their lives. This
disparity can afflict Logicians with some insecurity, especially if they have constructed
complex narratives around the meaning of their friendship, which is more than likely.
Ever-independent Explorers may begin to feel boxed in by a narrative they don’t
necessarily support.
Rebalancing Logician–Explorer Friendships
Seeking Structured Projects Together
Social struggles may lead Logicians to turn inward, but Explorer friends have
personalities that naturally tempt them out of isolation and into a more active way
of behaving, which is perfect for ever-questioning, knowledge-hungry Logicians.
However, Logicians can’t expect that Explorers routinely have any missionary zeal
toward making them more outgoing. They may have to actively tap into their Explorer
friends’ bias toward action by either expressing their willingness to join in or initiating
activities themselves.

Friendships
A concert, a paintball competition, or a hike are just some examples of the activities
these friends might share. Deliberate communal engagement might not come
naturally to many Logicians, but it’s key to overcoming social paralysis, as well as an
excellent way to enjoy their Explorer buddies’ company. When they engage in
activities, Logicians may want to commit to acting swiftly without spending time
ruminating over all the implications – otherwise, their typical patterns may persist.
Logicians in friendships with Explorers can consider the following suggestions.
• A theory is unlikely to resonate with Explorers unless it is attached to
something immediately practical.
• Explorers are more hands-on in their approach to life. Finding activities that
combine mental acuity with real-time physical manipulation can offer the
perfect compromise.
• Scan the newspaper or local Web sites for activities to share with Explorer
friends – with the intention of committing quickly rather than weighing
possibilities and implications.
Finding ways to stimulate thinking while pursuing structured, physical projects are
key to balanced Logician–Explorer friendships. The trick isn’t catering to one
personality style or the other, but rather blending the two into something interesting.
Open to Sheer Fun
Logicians may not connect easily with Entertainers and Adventurers through likeness
of mind, but opposites can be very attractive to those who wish to expand and
develop themselves. Entertainers can introduce Logicians to colorful worlds of
indulgent fun and carefree abandon, which are perfect for balancing out their usual
critical, non-committed, and intellectual approach to life. In return, Logicians may

Friendships
offer thoughtful insights to help Entertainers who are ready to create a little more
efficiency and ambition in their lives.
Logicians may enjoy Adventurers because they offer an enlightening contrast to
many of their traits without challenging their Introversion. Such friendships provide
a gateway to peace from their overactive minds through simple pleasures, such as
nature, food, art – things that provide complexity and aesthetic pleasure without
added pressure. Likewise, Logicians can help Adventurers appreciate a deeper
dimension of what they experience together.
To seize on activities with friends that have no other purpose than fun, Logicians can
consider the following.
• Go to the must-see movies, especially comedies.
• Take a hike.
• Build something together.
• Try new restaurants.
• Attend concerts.
• Participate in cooking demos, or try classes in art or craft techniques.
Sometimes friendship is just about companionship and fun company. This can be a
little hard to embrace for sometimes too-serious Logicians. Nonetheless, Explorer
friends can help them enjoy life and expand beyond a cerebral existence.

Friendships
Conclusion
Worth the Effort
Introversion and the Intuitive and Thinking traits are Logicians’ internal trifecta. Any
one of the three can hamper their attempts to reach out, and the three together can
multiply the difficulty. So, why not leave well enough alone and stay in the comfort
of solitude, absent of friends?
Friendships help cultivate thinking and provide a more objective mirror where
attributes are reflected. Although emotions may not be high on their list of priorities,
Logicians may need to develop emotional intelligence as part of their growth – and
this can occur through camaraderie. Friends’ brief observations and advice can do
more for Logicians than days of internal rumination and navel-gazing by providing
fresh material and insight. Living internally can be quite comfortable, but growth
doesn’t usually happen where things are too comfortable. Beyond that, speaking
practically, no person is an island. Everyone needs physical, emotional, and
intellectual support at times. Sometimes, it’s just nice to have someone around.
More importantly, Logicians have much creative thought to offer, and sharing
themselves with the broader world enriches everyone. Good friends can be the
optimal place to start.
Unique Friends
Social lives and friendships don’t come easily to Logicians. For them, the process can
be slow, as they build trust and learn what others want and need. People with this
personality type often approach companionship with a sense of risk and a fear of
rejection. But friendships are vessels for developing insight and expanding

Friendships
understanding, so Logicians take a giant step in the right direction when they realize
that relationships are more than just intellectual nourishment. Once they come to
trust human-to-human connections beyond rational or utilitarian considerations
alone, they’re likely, paradoxically, to open new vistas of deeper understanding
through the lives of their chums. Their insights will then take on new dimensions.
The fact that the process is slow and sometimes arduous makes rapport with
Logicians rare and, therefore, precious. They offer a perspective that no other type
can. Anyone who invests the time to make Logician friends will find their
imaginations tickled and their minds expanded. Logicians who reach out or open
themselves to friendships will discover that their world is a bigger and more
complete place than they might have imagined.

Parenthood
Parenthood
Devoted to Growth and Freedom
In parenting, as with all social roles, Logicians face a robust but healthy challenge.
Not naturally sensitive, these types struggle to identify with the standard raw
emotions and irrationality of young children who haven’t developed the self-control
and logic that Logicians take for granted. They’re nevertheless incredibly devoted –
perhaps not in the emotionally supportive sense, but in encouraging their children
to think independently, seek out knowledge, and voice and defend their own
opinions.
For Logicians, knowledge is key, and they strive to give their kids the tolerance and
freedom necessary to acquire it. These parents take a relaxed, intellectual approach,
allowing their sons and daughters to explore the world around them – and
overlooking minor offenses along the way. Having little interest in exerting control
over other human beings, Logicians allow their children to form their own principles.
However, they may take the “Why?" phase as an opportunity to share their
perspectives and ideas, just in case.

Parenthood
Accepting of Differences
Logicians aren’t particularly demanding parents, at least not in the sense that they
expect their children to live traditional lives of school / career / marriage / house /
kids / retirement (and in that order, thank you very much.) Instead, Logician parents
are demanding in an intellectual sense – they want their children to choose the right
path, whatever that entails.
This daunting level of personal freedom can take kids a long time to come to terms
with, and Logicians are prepared to stand by them every step of the way. These types
demonstrate incredible devotion and support to their sons and daughters, a
counterbalance to their occasional tendencies toward disinterest or criticism. In fact,
the more unique or “out-of-the-box” their children’s interests are, the more
supportive Logician parents are likely to be.
Lacking Emotional Intelligence
While Logicians are among the best personality types for intelligent, exploratory
discussions with their children, they may struggle to provide the emotional support
that many need, especially during their teenage years. In this area, Logician parents
may need to rely on more capable partners, or they may be able to take themselves
far out of their comfort zones to empathize with their kids. Instinct leads many
Logician parents to try to dispel tears with “sensible” suggestions and blunt truths,
but these are rarely persuasive to emotionally distraught children.
When their kids don’t pick up on ideas or concepts that seem obvious, Logician
parents sometimes grow impatient. Overestimating their children’s level of abilities
and understanding can cause these parents frustration; where other moms and dads
might see unreasonable expectations of competence or skill, Logicians may consider

Parenthood
their expectations necessarily strict. However, high expectations can be especially
hurtful to more sensitive children, who are more negatively affected by harsh or
harmful words. If they don’t keep such critical commentary in check, Logicians may
struggle to develop close emotional bonds with their children.
Pursuing Self-Improvement
Logicians’ strengths lie in the intellectual world, not in the practical or emotional
realms. Although their primary focus is generally on encouraging the development
of their rational minds, they’re certainly capable of improving their weaker areas as
well. In fact, Logicians are among the most intellectually curious personality types,
always seeking new information and a greater sense of their abilities. Actual growth
for them comes from both an awareness of their strengths and weaknesses and an
ability to figure out how to balance them in meaningful ways.
Self-knowledge, especially through personal mastery, is a major focus for these
parents. They’re keen to pass this on to their children as well, and parenthood is an
excellent motivator to pursue a greater understanding of self and others. Unlike
those who may engage in growth purely for the sake of personal development,
Logicians are more interested in seeking truth and making sense of the puzzle called
life. Curiosity is one of their primary traits; as parents, they pursue every opportunity
to embolden their sons and daughters to embrace their inquisitiveness and discover
their passions, regardless of how untraditional they may be.
Parenting for Each Stage of Development

Each stage of a child’s growth presents unique challenges and exciting milestones.
Learning how to navigate the stages can seem daunting, but the opportunity to build

Parenthood
healthy attachments and create meaningful memories makes the struggle
worthwhile.
Renowned psychologist Erik Erikson proposed a theory of psychosocial development
comprised of eight stages, five of which take place between birth and 18 years of age.
(The stages aren’t set in stone, and the ages listed for each stage are approximate.)
Children develop at their own pace and meet each milestone in their own time,
sometimes skipping stages, achieving them in an unexpected order, or trying one
milestone and falling back to an old one, which is especially common with babies
learning to walk. It’s worth developing healthy relationships with pediatric physicians
to check in with any questions and concerns, as they can distinguish normal
developmental delays from more serious concerns.
The following sections discuss expectations for each stage of development, as well
as how the strengths and weaknesses of the Logician personality type affect their
parenting at each stage.
Building Bonds (Birth–1½ Years)
According to Erikson, the stages of infancy and early childhood last from birth until
approximately three years of age. In these stages, children are very dependent on
their parents to meet their needs. This is also when parents create bonds of
attachment by meeting their babies’ needs, developing trusting relationships, and
promoting autonomy.
For infants on the journey to attachment, having their basic needs met is their
priority. From feeding to receiving affection, infants need to learn to trust their
parents to provide for them, or else they risk a sense of mistrust in their subsequent

Parenthood
relationships. If moms or dads are inconsistent or neglectful in providing for their
children, their infants can have difficulty creating positive, trusting attachments.
Attentive and affectionate parents, especially those who engage in consistent
physical contact such as snuggling or transporting their children in baby carriers on
their bodies, encourage trusting, hopeful relationships with their infants and are
likely to have minimal difficulty building comfortable attachments. Although building
healthy bonds is possible at every stage in life, early bonding establishes habits for
all of life; a healthy start contributes to a healthy future.
Balanced Infant Parenting
Wonder Full
The awe and beauty of bringing new lives into the world aren’t lost on Logicians, who
may find the birth of their own children profoundly interesting. Much like they
contemplate the mysteries of the cosmos and other such lofty concepts, Logician
parents look upon their infants as enigmas, wrapped inside mysteries, swaddled in
blankets.
With limitless potential and possibilities at this stage in their lives, infants are thrilling
and inspirational little humans. Logicians who aren’t overwhelmed by fear of failing
as parents appreciate this stage’s evolution from a living blank slate. Watching their
babies grow from helplessness to id-driven balls of personality is fascinating for this
ever-curious personality type.
Figuring out what makes their children tick becomes a sort of Rubik’s cube-type quest
for Logician parents. There’s no shortage of information to gather as they observe
their infants in action during this stage of rapid growth and development. Intrigued,

Parenthood
involved Logicians find they have front-row seats to one of the most fascinating case
studies they could possibly encounter – the transformation of a group of cells into
an actual human being.
The “Anti-Helicopter” Parent
Many moms and dads find themselves hovering over their newborns, fretting over
every gurgle, cough, and cry, but Logicians can be remarkably relaxed when it comes
to parenting. They don’t lack concern about their infants’ well-being. Logicians who
have prepared for their parental role see no logical reason to get worked up about
every burp and sigh. Taking care of their babies to the best of their abilities is their
priority, and they recognize that excessive worrying interferes with that goal.
Avoiding excessive worry is only one part of their laid-back approach to parenting
infants, however. These types’ “live-and-let-live” mentality means that they tend to be
more interested in observing their children’s growth and behavior than actively
influencing it. At their best, Logicians revel in engaging with their children through
caretaking activities such as feeding and bath time, as well as through play. They’re
less likely than others to feel as though they must attend parent-baby yoga sessions
or schedule play dates for their non-verbal, not-yet-crawling infants to ensure
“proper socialization.” Logicians see the importance of promoting their children’s
development, but they aren’t likely to obsess over it.
Unbalanced Infant Parenting
Finding Physical Contact Intimidating
Logicians typically aren’t a physically affectionate personality type; they often opt to
bond with others through intellectual discourse and shared interests. Unfortunately

Parenthood
for these parents, children at this stage are incapable of “cerebral” interactions. The
thought of cuddling might make Logicians cringe if they let their discomfort for
intentional and prolonged physical contact override their desire to bond with their
kids. It may be difficult for them to see how a tiny creature that eats, sleeps, and can’t
control its bladder or bowel function may fail to thrive if they don’t constantly cuddle
and coo at them.
The truth is, such contact isn’t purely for attachment purposes. Infants need frequent
physical contact to build the proper neural pathways for growth. Physical stimulation
– cuddling, cradling, baby-wearing, eye contact, and even baby talk – are vitally
important for infants’ overall physical, emotional, and intellectual development.
Logicians who don’t reinforce these neural pathways through consistent, loving
interactions can find not just their bonds negatively affected, but also their children’s
overall development.
Rebalancing Infant Parenting
The Affection Experiment
The desire for physical contact may not come naturally to Logicians. However, they
can use their new parental role to improve their understanding of the benefits of
physical contact – and practice it on their very willing, non-judgmental participants.
In fact, Logician parents may unwittingly find themselves drawn to cuddling and
rocking after being exposed to the pheromones that produce that delightful “new
baby” smell. Fear not if this doesn’t happen immediately, however; as with any new
skill, displaying physical affection might take practice.
The importance of gaining this skill can’t be understated. First, and most
fundamentally, it can quite literally help them to meet their children’s immediate

Parenthood
needs, as comfort, attention, diaper changing, and bathing all require patient, loving
contact. Second, intentional interaction with their babies can help them to form
parental attachments and deeper understanding of, and interest in, the tiny humans
being for whom they’re responsible.
The following “affection experiments” may sound simple, but they can help Logicians
promote their infants’ development while also encouraging crucial, lasting parent-
child bonds.
• Practice reciprocating the baby’s laughter, facial expressions, and even hand
motions.
• Engage in physical contact as much as possible. Keep the infant close in a
wearable child carrier when running errands and when doing daily activities
around the house.
• Speak in a soothing voice, sing, and encourage eye contact.
• Keep in mind that every interaction promotes infant growth and development
at a very cellular level. This type of growth is exciting for parents to both
encourage and observe.
Seeing their children as individual beings, rather than as responsibilities that distract
them from what truly excites them, can help Logicians to develop sincere affection.
It may even inspire them to explore new interests related to parenting or to meeting
their children’s needs – the invention of self-changing diapers, perhaps?
Testing Boundaries (1½–3 Years)
Once they’re mobile, young children become very interested in exploring their
environment with their senses. Crawling, walking, grabbing items, putting things in

Parenthood
their mouths, and verbal communication are just a few of the ways that toddlers
learn about the world around them.
During this stage, Logician parents must provide a safe harbor for their children while
still allowing them to experience and explore their surroundings. Children who are
free to test boundaries – while still receiving parental support and encouragement –
develop a healthy sense of autonomy, while those who are overly restricted,
criticized, or made to feel guilty for pushing limits ultimately experience a sense of
shame, and may suffer from feelings of incompetence or low self-worth. Such
feelings can last throughout their lives, jeopardize their abilities to achieve goals, and
hinder their developing such positive character traits as reliability and confidence.
Balanced Toddler Parenting
Eagerly Encouraging Learning
Increasing knowledge is a high priority for Logicians, and they’re always encouraging
their children to engage in activities where they can learn something. The exploration
stage is an exciting one for parents and kids alike, as they reach meaningful
milestones such as talking, walking, and learning how to manipulate toys and tools
(such as forks and spoons). Logician moms and dads happily provide their toddlers
with plenty of stimulation and opportunities for exploration while remaining the safe
harbor where they can return for explanations and support.
From borrowing library books on motorized vehicles for car-loving toddlers to
outfitting their space-obsessed children’s bedrooms with planetarium night lights,
conscientious Logicians work to incorporate learning into everything they do with
their little ones. Such experiences increase their toddlers’ knowledge and create
deeper bonds between them and their parents. The more positive learning

Parenthood
experiences they have with their parents, the more likely they are to seek out
educational experiences in the future. Logicians who invest time encouraging their
toddlers’ growth and learning lay the foundation for their children to be successful
and motivated in the future.
Curious and Questioning
Logicians are one of the most curious personality types – they’re just as interested in
exploring and questioning the world around them as their children are. This shared
desire to explore offers incredible opportunities for bonding both intellectually and
emotionally with their sons and daughters. These parents have no problem
understanding their children’s desire to test boundaries and question literally
anything and everything.
Many parents feel frustrated by toddlers who question everything. Not so for
Logicians, who typically feel a tinge of pride when their little ones want to learn more.
Although they certainly expect their children to respect their authority, these types
are more than willing to entertain questions or challenges they deem legitimate or
novel. Toddlers in the middle of a tantrum won’t be granted this consideration, but
those who ask thoughtful questions, or object to an order for a good reason, are
likely to receive thoughtful responses from Logician parents.
Unbalanced Toddler Parenting
Lacking Stability and Structure
Creativity and curiosity are typically invaluable parts of a productive life, but when
these attributes take priority, Logician parents may find that they aren’t providing
stability and structure that their children need. With their minds abuzz with ideas,

Parenthood
they can become so caught up in life’s possibilities that they forget to plan, for
example, what they’re going to feed their children for dinner – depending on what’s
in the pantry, this can be an inconvenience or a disaster. For kids at this stage to feel
secure, at least some structure is essential, and when their living situations lack
stability, their behavior and relationships can suffer.
Toddlers are creatures of habit, and they derive comfort from knowing exactly when
they’ll receive meals, naps, and baths. When they believe that their needs are going
to be met, children at this stage can confidently explore the world around them.
Perhaps more importantly, they trust that their parents can and will take care of
them, which is vital for building secure attachments.
Rebalancing Toddler Parenting
Creating a Flexible Routine
The word “routine” can sound like torture to Logicians, who love nothing more than
to follow a whim wherever it may take them. Strokes of brilliance have no schedule;
sacrificing the ability to delve deeply into inspiration can seem unbearable.
Parenthood, however, requires a new level of attention, as well as intention.
To know that breakfast happens after the routine of getting dressed, that naptime is
after lunch, and that there’s (almost) always a bath and story before bedtime
provides a sense of stability that toddlers need to feel safe and loved. Logician
parents who are struggling to embrace any form of routine must realize that they
have plenty of room to create a structure or rhythm that meets both their own needs
and those of their children.

Parenthood
It isn’t just possible for Logicians to build in time for their own interests; it’s necessary
if they want to parent to the best of their abilities. Flexible routines – those that make
sure responsibilities are met while also providing opportunities for spontaneity and
unexpected activities – can provide just what these parents need to survive the
toddler stage. The following outline provides insights for creating routines with just
the right balance of structure and flexibility based on individual family needs.
• First, and most importantly, determine the necessities that must be
considered every day, such as meals, bedtime, and school or work.
• Next, add in activities that are priorities for members of the family – such as
alone time, family time, exercise, or hobbies.
• Utilize scheduling tools – an online calendar, a bullet journal, a day planner, or
even a large family calendar hanging in the kitchen or family room – to help
organize and remind everyone about important appointments or events.
• When creating a schedule for the day, make sure to include periods of time
with nothing booked in. This allows for flexibility.
• Figure out a rhythm that works best for the family, and then commit to that
routine for at least 28 days so that it can evolve into a habit.
Keep in mind that routines promote freedom by setting priorities. Routines,
especially those that incorporate flexibility, aren’t prison sentences; they’re ways to
accomplish essential tasks, so the rest of life is more productive and engaged.
Thirst for Knowledge (3–5 Years)
The preschool years, from approximately three to five years of age, are a prime time
for brain development, where children accumulate knowledge at an extraordinary
rate. Kids absorb information like sponges through constant activity as well as

Parenthood
seemingly endless and disorganized questioning. Learning during this stage takes
place through play, especially the unstructured and imaginary kind, as well as lots of
social interaction with family and peers. Creativity is also exercised extensively
through make-believe games and stories.
Children who aren’t given the opportunity to initiate activities, or who are made to
feel as though their constant questions or childish games are annoying, can
experience feelings of guilt, frustration, and a lack of competence. Consequently,
they may suffer from poor self-control or a lack of initiative. On the other hand, those
who can make some of their own decisions, initiate activities with their family and
peers, ask questions and receive answers, and lead others in explorative play gain
confidence in their abilities and have the initiative necessary to gain competence in
subsequent years.
Balanced Preschool Parenting
Competent Mentors
As imaginative, adaptable, and quick-witted individuals who excel at solving
problems, Logicians have no problem modeling those behaviors. They’re likely to
encourage their children to engage in imaginative play and to practice creative
problem-solving through activities like board games and puzzles. As stated in the
previous section, these parents encourage learning, and they usually do their best to
answer their children’s questions, no matter how incessant. In fact, Logicians take
great pleasure in explaining concepts, especially complicated ones. These types
enjoy their role as informers.
Curiosity, independent thinking, and an objective worldview are underrepresented
but valuable skills for children. Those who take time out of their own inner world

Parenthood
encourage their preschoolers to view every situation as not just a learning
opportunity but also a chance to experience or create something completely new.
Something as simple as a walk around the neighborhood can be an impromptu
lesson on the basic physics behind a falling acorn and the geological characteristics
of an interesting rock. Logicians enjoy prompting their children to question
everything, for better or worse, and instill a deep curiosity and a love of learning from
a very early age.
Promoting Independence and Problem-Solving
In addition to providing endless information and learning opportunities for their
children, Logicians also promote independence. If kids at this stage lack confidence
in their own thoughts and beliefs, they may depend on others to lead them, provide
them with information, or motivate them. This type of passive acceptance runs
counter to everything that Logicians stand for. Rather than allowing their sons and
daughters to take a back seat in their own lives, Logicians focus on helping them feel
confident and capable enough in their abilities to make choices on their own.
Self-assured parents with this personality type actively encourage their children to
step up and develop their own critical thinking skills. At this stage, for example, they
might expect their preschoolers to use their problem-solving skills to deal with
difficult-to-play-with peers. Logicians who understand the importance of moderating
their interference in their children’s issues are unlikely to pander to their
preschoolers’ desire for their parents to solve their problems. Instead, they can work
with their children to figure out creative, age-appropriate solutions.

Parenthood
Unbalanced Preschool Parenting
Struggling to Enjoy Interactions
The increased conversational skills and improved mental acuity that accompany the
preschool years can be downright misleading for Logicians who tend to treat their
children as tiny, capable adults. Although they certainly don’t expect them to cook
meals, clean the gutters, or schedule carpooling, they may expect greater
understanding and future planning than their little ones can achieve at this stage of
life.
These types may feel as though they’ve been forced to forgo their own needs and
desires to attend to their kids. Children at this stage do gain more independence,
which may strike Logicians as the chance to focus more intently on their own
concerns. When they focus their direction inwardly, they may find themselves with
less patience and optimism to spare for their little ones than anyone would like.
Preschoolers pick up on their parents’ emotions, and this type of frustration can
quickly cause hurt feelings and confusion.
Rebalancing Preschool Parenting
Engaging in Creative Play
Finding ways to connect with – and remain connected with – their children are just
as important as finding time for Logician parents’ own interests. The helpless infant
years and demanding toddler years can take a toll on any caretaker, and Logicians
who value their privacy and independence are no different. The preschool years can
seem like a welcome reprieve from constant neediness, but their excitement over
free time can unintentionally put a wedge in their parent-child relationships.

Parenthood
These types can get their fix of using their imaginations and solving problems while
still engaging with their children and nurturing the relationship. Kids at this stage love
to play and share their own ideas, dreams, and visions with the people they love.
Logicians can increase bonding with their children exponentially if they find ways to
interact that allow both parties to engage in creative, interest-led activities. Here are
some examples these parents can try:
• Play a game of “Simon Says” where the child takes the lead and tells their
parent what to do.
• Build or create something from scratch, such as building with blocks, molding
clay, creating paper crafts, coloring, or painting. Make sure to do this in a place
where messes can be made without consequences.
• Engage in outdoor play with natural items such as sticks, stones, dirt, and
water. This promotes creativity and imagination in ways that structured play
and video games cannot.
Logician parents who choose to follow can be pleasantly surprised, and even
inspired, by the creative, intelligent solutions to which their children lead them.
Engaging in these activities with their sons and daughters is likely to spark their own
imaginations, possibly even helping them to come up with some simple solutions
they wouldn’t have previously considered. After all, they once enjoyed the same
childhood wonder as their preschoolers – they may as well take advantage of
opportunities to experience such moments again, as well as observe their children’s
experiences.

Parenthood
Creating Competence (5–12 Years)
The early school years are an important period of skills development. Young children
are continually absorbing new information, and they’re also developing proficiency
in increasingly complex areas, from mathematics to athletics to relationships. Kids
who are both challenged and supported tend to flourish in their abilities as well as
confidence.
If Logician parents don’t provide consistent support and set realistic expectations,
students at this stage can begin to feel inferior to their peers and may be less likely
to develop long-term goals (or work toward achieving them). On the other hand, if
they aren’t sufficiently challenged, children in this stage can begin to feel overly
confident in themselves and their abilities, eventually culminating in a lack of
modesty and compassion toward others.
Balanced School-Age Parenting
Encouraging Deep Learning
As parents, Logicians have no trouble challenging their children to improve
themselves and to set and achieve increasingly ambitious goals, though these goals
may not always take an expected form. Becoming immersed in something they’re
truly passionate about is of the utmost importance to Logicians, and they take every
opportunity to promote their kids’ desire to increase their knowledge and skills. Are
their children passionate about dinosaurs? Logician parents won’t hesitate to provide
books, educational videos, and museum trips galore.
Merely “learning about something” won’t suffice for Logicians, who place a great deal
of emphasis on deeply exploring topics. Their own well-balanced enthusiasm for

Parenthood
ideas and passion projects often inspires their children to become increasingly
knowledgeable in whatever they pursue, especially in areas related to their
intellectual development.
Excelling at Exploring Goals
Children at this stage are beginning to explore personal goals, and Logician parents
can be excellent models of the intellectual curiosity needed to succeed. School-aged
kids face increasing skill and knowledge expectations, and they benefit from parents
who can teach them how to strategically meet these expectations. They find great joy
in sitting down with their sons and daughters to help them figure out what they must
do to achieve their goals academically, socially, and personally.
Developing long-term goals is a challenge for children who lack the ability to
effectively engage in future planning – a skill that becomes increasingly necessary
during the school-age years. Logician parents can help their kids by drawing on the
process they engage in to explore and develop their own personal goals. They can
use their skills and resources to help their children plan and prepare for projects: If
their kids want to make solar-powered toilets for the science fair, Logician parents
can work with them to make the best toilets possible.
Unbalanced School-Age Parenting
Excessively Rational
Rationality is a profound tool, but when it becomes the keystone of their identities,
Logicians may find themselves unintentionally eroding their children’s confidence
with criticism. Kids at this stage are just being introduced to topics, not taking a deep
dive into theoretical implications or foundational underpinnings, and Logicians can

Parenthood
be unrealistic if they expect their children to apply collegiate-level algebraic theories
to their Intro to Algebra homework. This extends beyond intellectual pursuits.
Cognitive development, which includes intellectual and psychological components,
has just started at this age, so children at this stage tend to struggle with
understanding abstract concepts.
Additionally, an excessively rational approach often discounts children’s feelings,
which is unlikely to go over well at this stage. Particularly sensitive school-aged
children are more likely to react with behavioral outbursts, or even refuse to engage
with others, out of fear of rejection. Logicians who deem emotional connections
illogical, or otherwise are unable or unwilling to connect with their children on an
emotional level, have difficulty promoting the confidence their kids need to become
self-assured, competent adults.
Rebalancing School-Age Parenting
Becoming an Active Listener
Peers and teachers exert an increasing influence on school-age children, but parents
still take the lead in fostering their skills, goals, and, ultimately, confidence. Logician
moms and dads must balance their obsession with rationalism with compassion and
personal understanding. Those who struggle with this should try to decrease
criticism and focus on empathy. As forward-thinking as they are, and as successful
as they hope their kids will be, Logician parents must learn to temper their
motivations with compassion.
Active listening is one of the most effective ways to practice compassion. It’s much
easier for Logicians to connect with and understand their children when they really
take the time to understand where they’re coming from. Most school-aged kids love

Parenthood
talking to their parents, discussing anything from their school day to what they want
to be when they grow up. The following steps can help Logician parents develop
active listening skills to help them communicate with their sons and daughters in
more compassionate and effective ways.
• Take time to listen to children’s concerns, questions, and frustrations without
focusing exclusively on how to solve their problems.
• Once time is taken to improve understanding of the situation, focus on
working with them to help them develop their own solutions, if necessary.
• Keep in mind that it’s incredibly important for parents to practice non-
judgment when they’re actively listening to their children. Listening is more
important than providing an opinion in most circumstances – an important
skill to learn when communicating with children and adults alike.
Communication is one of the most important components of any relationship.
Parents who support their children with positive communication and sincere interest
in what they have to say can not only get a better idea of who their children really
are but also promote their confidence. Knowing that their parents love and at least
attempt to understand them helps them feel ready to take on the world.
Finding Thyself (12–18 Years)
Adolescence is the transition from childhood to adulthood, when young people focus
on developing their own distinct identities. This transitional period revolves around
a sense of what their roles are in their relationships with themselves, others, and
society in general. To determine their roles, adolescents begin the all-important
process of identifying their personal values and beliefs. They make educational and

Parenthood
future career goals, and they develop relationships based on these budding belief
systems – making this a pivotal, foundational stage for the rest of their lives.
To help their kids navigate this stage, parents must balance increasing independence
and opportunities for self-exploration with guided preparation for the future.
Adolescents who are unable to make responsible choices, either due to lack of
opportunity or because they were not given the proper guidance to do so, can
struggle to succeed in the world. On the other hand, teens who do receive such
support, and are encouraged to develop their identities and define their values and
beliefs, tend to build strong foundations for their future endeavors and relationships.
Balanced Adolescent Parenting
Encourage Exploration
Much like in their toddler years, adolescents find themselves in a transitional stage
focused on exploration. This time, however, they’re focused on discovering their own
identities instead of exploring their external environments. Logician parents who
embrace their thirst for knowledge as a tool for personal improvement can be
exceptional models for this type of growth.
Logicians who confidently create personal visions also show their passion for
learning and growth. Learning a new skill or mastering a new topic takes curiosity
and dedication, and motivated Logicians have copious amounts of both. Their
natural desire to learn and improve is on display for their children on a regular basis.
These types encourage their kids to explore their interests, regardless of how
“practical” they may be, which can provide the confidence boost that adolescents
need to pursue their passions.

Parenthood
Promoting Development of Personal Objectives
During this stage of identity development, teens need their parents’ support and
understanding more than ever. One of the most important aspects of personal
growth for Logicians is the development of personal objectives that support various
aspects of their identities. Parents who remain open to others’ individual
perspectives and needs while standing strong in their own convictions encourage
their children to develop their own unique code of conduct as well – one that
resonates with them and isn’t overly influenced by external factors. If their objectives
encourage them to follow their passion, Logician parents let their sons and
daughters fill in the blanks to meet their personal needs and desires.
These parents encourage the development of a code of conduct by promoting and
modeling positive values, such as objectivity, creative thinking, independence, and
lifelong learning, while providing their teenagers with a supportive environment.
Although they may struggle with the expectations they have for their children,
Logicians are still interested in assisting them in the process of personal
development to the best of their abilities.
Unbalanced Adolescent Parenting
Permission to Do… Whatever
The more competent and independent their children become, the more likely
Logicians are to relinquish any semblance of control or structure they may have
previously enforced. Logicians, who themselves despise feeling controlled by others,
may view any rules or guidelines as interfering with their teens’ free will, detrimental
to their autonomy. But if they fail to realize the importance of boundaries during

Parenthood
these final years of truly influential parenting, they may set their kids up for a harder
future.
There’s a significant difference between being authoritative as a parent – being
trustworthy, reliable, and considerate – and being authoritarian as a parent – focusing
on strict obedience to authority regardless of personal circumstance. Permissiveness
without reasonable boundaries can result in children who struggle to develop their
own sense of self. Looking to other people or sources for acceptance and self-worth
can lead to unhealthy dependencies. Though they may seem mature, adolescents
rarely understand the full range of potential consequences for their behavior. It is up
to Logician parents to help them, or they risk watching their children make
irresponsible, and sometimes irreversible, decisions.
Unwittingly Critical
Critical comments, especially regarding their adolescents’ abilities or their personal
style, can be especially devastating to children who already feel as though they’re
constantly judged by others. Their often-fragile sense of self is particularly sensitive
during this stage, as they work on coming to terms with how they want to see
themselves versus how society views them. Logician parents who constantly, and
often subconsciously, move the goal posts for success (“Good thing you passed that
test; next time, focus on getting an A.”) can critically harm their children’s self-esteem
and, in turn, their relationships with them.
Constant passive-aggressive criticism can certainly breed resentment from their
teenagers. Logicians who are less self-aware may even find themselves
unintentionally holding mistakes over their children’s heads by reminding them of
their failures. They believe this is good-natured ribbing, but that kind of

Parenthood
unconstructive criticism can easily come across as unfair or downright humiliating. It
is especially harmful during this stage, when kids most need understanding and
context to help them learn from their struggles.
Rebalancing Adolescent Parenting
Promoting Self-Discipline
As Logician parents learn to navigate their children’s changing needs and growing
independence, understanding is crucial. This stage requires a constant rebalancing
of responsibility and expectations as adolescents become more capable,
responsible, and mature. It can be difficult for Logicians to continue enforcing the
boundaries that their adolescent children need during a stage when they appear so
capable and insistent. These parents pride themselves on their own autonomy and
desire nothing more than to help their kids achieve the same level of independence
as soon as possible. However, the consequences of too much freedom at this stage
can be especially tragic, so parents must help their sons and daughters to
understand the potential outcomes of their behaviors.
Logician parents who wish to encourage their children’s personal growth and
independence while still maintaining necessary structure and boundaries should
focus on promoting their kids’ self-discipline. Adolescents who engage in self-
discipline – doing what is right and delaying gratification when necessary – are more
likely to mature into healthy, independent, and successful adults.
One example of how to foster self-discipline is to teach adolescents how to manage
their emotions – an especially difficult task at this stage – using the “ABCDE” method.
To utilize this technique effectively, however, Logician parents must remain
sympathetic to their children’s needs, and avoid forcing them to try to reason in the

Parenthood
heat of their emotions. Allowing teens a chance to vent and then cool down can lead
to a more meaningful practice of the ABCDE exercise.
The ABCDE method, step by step, is as follows:
• A: Identify an activating event.
o Example: Failing a driver’s license test.
• B: Determine the irrational beliefs that resulted from the event.
o The test was impossible; the test-taker was not smart enough to pass.
• C: Consider the emotional consequences of those beliefs.
o Anger, frustration, and sadness that results in their yelling at their
parents; they lose faith in their ability to succeed.
• D: Dispute or challenge the irrational beliefs.
o Discuss the irrational belief, like an impossible test or their own
stupidity, and determine whether the event was more likely caused by
a lack of study and practice, leading to test anxiety or knowledge gaps.
• E: Replace irrational beliefs with new, effective beliefs that result in positive
behaviors.
o More study and practice before retaking the driver’s license test can
increase knowledge and improve confidence, hopefully preventing test
anxiety and resulting in a passing score.
Logicians may have to help their adolescent children through the ABCDE process a
few times before they’re comfortable practicing it on their own. By practicing this
technique, teens can eventually learn how to handle their emotions. These are the
foundational skills behind self-discipline. Logician parents who practice these skills
with their children can help them to develop the tools they need to function most
effectively on their own.

Parenthood
Cultivating Positive Communication
Even when they’re at their most critical, Logician parents genuinely care, as they truly
want their children to be happy and successful. Hassling their children for a less-
than-perfect grade may be demoralizing to their teenagers, but their intentions are
often meant to be supportive. They want what’s best for their kids, but the way they
communicate this sentiment can become muddled by their strong (though well-
intentioned) personal opinions.
The first step to solving this communication problem is realizing that good intentions
aren’t successfully communicated by criticism or constant identification of logical
fallacies. Instead, Logician parents can practice the always-important active listening
skills they cultivated with their school-aged children, as discussed in the previous
section. Taking time to truly listen to what their kids have to say, letting them vent
when necessary, and providing them with thoughtful, supportive responses are
incredibly important during this stage.
The following tips can help Logicians communicate with their adolescent children in
much more positive, productive ways.
• Suspend judgment. Don’t jump to conclusions or make assumptions about
motives, beliefs, or opinions. This helps to prevent potential
misunderstandings.
• Don’t discount feelings. Adolescents need to feel as though their parents are
taking their feelings into consideration to communicate in honest, open ways.
• Avoid arguing. Nothing escalates a simple conversation into a full-blown fight
faster than being combative.

Parenthood
• Speak compassionately. Be intentional about not expressing things in angry or
critical ways when engaging in a conversation.
Communicating in a positive, loving way is vital for parents who truly desire to help
their teenagers feel supported and understood during this transitional time.
Developing a personal identity and creating a system of values are complex
processes. Logicians, with their ability to make sense of the abstract, can help point
their kids in directions that suit them best by serving as non-judgmental sounding
boards.
Conclusion
Parenting is one of the most challenging experiences that anyone can face,
regardless of their personality type. Logicians have their own unique strengths they
can leverage – imagination, objectivity, enthusiasm, and receptiveness – as well as
weaknesses they need to understand and balance to build positive, proactive
relationships with their children. Tremendous potential for personal development
exists when people become parents, and Logicians can gain a much deeper
understanding of themselves and their kids if they take the opportunity to do so.
The advice provided above is based on general growth stages for children and basic
strengths and weaknesses that many Logicians share. All children are different, and
parents are the best judge of what their children need. The guidance here should be
used in a way that works best for each family without adding additional stress,
frustration, or burden. For special situations, such as behavioral or medical issues, it
is best to consult with professional pediatricians or pediatric psychologists to come
up with a plan that works best for everyone involved.

Academic Path
Academic Path
Logicians’ academic experiences can alter the course of their lives. As with any other
personality type, their schooling positively or negatively affects their self-esteem,
steers their career choices, and influences the development of their unique
personalities. By understanding how their gifts and weakness translate into a
classroom setting, Logicians can equip themselves to gain not only deep learning but
also personal enrichment and growth from their time in school.
These students enjoy wide-ranging intellectual curiosity, but that trait doesn’t
necessarily guarantee academic success or fulfillment. As they navigate their
schooling, people with this personality type do well to watch out for common pitfalls
and seek opportunities to expand their strengths. Logicians who embrace their
unique styles while learning to work within structured educational programs can
enjoy academic careers that are intellectually gratifying as well as personally
meaningful.

Academic Path
How Logicians Learn

Adept at abstract thought, Logician pupils possess a wealth of intellectual curiosity,
which gives them a good chance of enjoying their schooling. That said, they may
experience significant tension when faced with due dates and preset project
objectives, as rigidly structured learning environments pose challenges for these
independent-minded types. Logicians also might find themselves disagreeing with
their instructors, particularly in subjects that allow room for interpretation.
If frustration doesn’t turn into wholesale dismissal of alternative viewpoints and
educational approaches, Logicians’ love of learning and discovery can sustain them
throughout their academic careers. In this light, schooling becomes an opportunity
to not only pursue their passions but also develop the skills required to collaborate
with others and see their projects through to completion – skills that can serve them
for the rest of their lives, even if they don’t realize it at the time.
Balanced Learning Habits
Original Explorations
Logician students enjoy unfettered, independent study. Such independence can be
a beautiful thing, enabling them to question and even surpass conventional thought.
Given the space to grow, along with just enough outside encouragement, they
develop a true love for learning, and their creativity and capacity for innovation
flourish.
When faced with generic assignments, they often push themselves to develop
original, unexpected responses. In math class, they might work out proofs alongside
their work on assigned problems; in literature class, they might take essay prompts

Academic Path
in entirely new directions. For Logicians, such exercises in originality produce self-
esteem and self-respect – as well as enable them to find meaning in projects that
might otherwise seem dull, uninspiring, or not worth finishing. By embarking on self-
motivated explorations, they improve their capacities for creativity and lateral
thinking, two skills that are foundational to their positive self-image. The skills can
even pave the way for Logicians to enjoy learning and academic exploration long
after their school years, something they find incredibly gratifying.
Openness
Their curiosity cannot be overstated, and it enables them to engage with the
academic world without the hang-ups or preconceptions that might hinder other
types. As a result, Logicians can glean a surprising amount of energy and pleasure
from covering new academic terrain. For them, learning offers their ever-working
minds a reason to focus, explore, and delve into topics that they find fascinating –
whether neurobiology or noetic philosophy.
Because Logicians are rare, they may sometimes feel isolated or disconnected from
others. In a way, learning offers them hope, allowing them to break out of unhelpful
thought patterns and connect with the outside world. As these students dig into the
subjects that matter to them, they might encounter prominent historical or present-
day figures who inspire them, as well as meaningful problems that represent a
purpose and direction. Finding ways to bridge their interests with the real world
generates a heady enthusiasm in Logicians, often motivating them to spend most of
their free time immersed their interests.
To sustain their enthusiasm in lasting, impactful ways, self-aware Logicians create
conditions that support their interests even after the first bloom of fascination fades.

Academic Path
For example, they might join academic clubs or research groups offering
accountability without cramping their style, or they might seek out instructors who
can mentor and help them eventually turn their ideas into reality. By doing so, they
channel their enthusiasm in meaningful, productive ways, rather than bouncing from
one new pursuit to another without ever following through.
Unbalanced Learning Habits
Going Rogue
Impassioned learners, Logicians have an insatiable hunger for knowledge, and their
energy and curiosity can be contagious. However voracious, their intellectual
appetites at times lack the vital components of discrimination and discipline. If they
thrive on the thrill of discovery rather than the satisfaction of a completed project,
Logicians can experience catastrophe if they, for example, fail to turn in a final paper
despite engaging thoroughly with the subject for weeks leading up to the due date.
Alas, long-term academic growth requires focus and consistency. Even if Logicians
don’t concern themselves with grades or external measures of success, their self-
esteem suffers when they neglect projects or ideas that interest them – whether
inside or outside the classroom. Those who fail to complete projects don’t lack the
capacity to bring their ideas to fruition – often, they fail because they haven’t
overcome internal resistance. Sadly, Logicians in this situation often turn their
frustration inward, blaming themselves for not living up to their potential.
Alternatively, they might indulge in arrogance, laying blame on their instructors or
the educational system itself. What they often need instead is to focus on changing
their own behaviors.

Academic Path
No Guardrails
Logicians may fail to appreciate that academic structures serve as valuable
guardrails. Although they may seem merely pesky or annoying, such structures
prevent all students, including Logicians, from graduating with significant gaps in
their knowledge or skills. Gaps have the potential to derail Logicians’ long-term
visions and dreams, setting them up for a future in which they can envision great
ideas but not execute them.
Unless they recognize the connection between academic structure and their future
success, however, Logician students may unleash indifference or even disdain on
parents, teachers, and other authority figures who attempt to impose curricula or
guidelines. They might even feel disdain for the academic system itself, resenting the
structure it imposes upon them. In some cases, they simply drop out, thinking they
can do better on their own.
These types tend to keep an open mind to other viewpoints, but when told what to
do, they can become surprisingly stubborn. They may shrug off their teachers’
wisdom or chafe when required to consider other students’ input (for example,
during group projects). Such stubbornness comes at a cost: Logicians who disregard
the wisdom of others in favor of their own preferences may eventually find
themselves outpaced by classmates who’ve learned everything they can from their
schooling.

Academic Path
Rebalancing Learning Habits
Following Through
We can only improve at something if we stick with it. As Oprah Winfrey says, “Failing
is another stepping stone to greatness.” Many Logicians find it difficult to stick with
projects, including aspects of their studies, once the initial luster has worn off. This
attitude robs them of the motivation they need to follow through when they face the
prospect of failure – which, at times, we all do.
When they’re on the brink of walking away from something, these students can
remind themselves why they were interested in the subject in the first place. If they
can rekindle that initial spark of curiosity and desire, they might discover that they’re
indeed able to develop a consistent work or study habit, stay true to their interests,
and achieve the results they desire – whether an independent study project, a
research program, or a finely executed academic paper.
To reclaim the motivation they need to follow through, Logicians can ask themselves
the following questions.
• “What idea did I have about my life or my potential when I set out on this
aspect of my academic journey?”
• “What challenge, failure, or discouragement pushed me off course or
diminished my enthusiasm?”
• “What specific actions can I take to navigate around the obstacle or move on
from the experience?”
o For example, if they were beat up by a math course, maybe they should
take another run at it, but this time ensure that they minimize other
commitments or obligations, so their attention isn’t divided.

Academic Path
o Perhaps they can create a schedule or timeline. Or, maybe they need to
write out a plan on a piece of paper and post it in a prominent place.
By rekindling their curiosity and creating a concrete plan for following through,
Logicians can stick with the subjects they love – despite inevitable disappointments
and wrong turns – and work toward their true potential.
Gathering Evidence
Those who decry the usefulness of structured educational systems, particularly
systems that require them to take classes outside their interests, might believe quite
strongly that such systems are a waste of time, conducive to mediocrity and
uniformity rather personal growth and success. But do these beliefs hold true?
Answering this question requires conducting an experiment and seeking verifiable
proof, not simply pontificating or indulging in a thought experiment. Given their
openness and curiosity, Logicians are fully capable of recognizing and examining
their assumptions – then adapting, if they find they’ve been holding untrue beliefs.
To be sure, each structured educational system is different. Different colleges, for
example, might uphold different core curricula, and different teachers require
different projects from their students. Logicians who resent the academic guardrails
that constrain them would do well to gather evidence as to whether such structures
are useful.
Here’s how they can start.
• Try taking two courses in consecutive semesters or terms: first a required
course that isn’t of interest, then a course that particularly piques your
interest.

Academic Path
• Then, answer one question: Were you able to draw on information from the
first class to inject an original element into the second?
• Honoring the scientific method, try to replicate the results. Specifically, take a
second course outside your interest, followed by a second course in your
chosen field, repeatedly asking yourself whether the uninteresting course(s)
lent anything of use to your chosen area(s) of study.
Approaching required courses with an open, experimental mindset can make the
work more interesting – or at least more bearable. Even better, the exercise can help
Logicians spot the value inherent in all learning, not just in their favorite subjects.
Logicians in High School

For Logicians, high school can be the best of times or the worst of times. On the plus
side, high school may be the first time in their lives when their academic efforts are
taken seriously, either by themselves or by others. However, high school is a socially
intense phase of development for many students, and these types might find
themselves feeling isolated or out of place.
Logicians at this stage might find themselves struggling to distinguish between
information and knowledge. Although both categories are important, students who
lean too heavily on one might find themselves overly invested in data or conceptual
understanding without truly benefiting. Fortunately, by addressing these and other
potential pitfalls directly and thoughtfully, Logicians can enjoy a balanced,
productive, and enlivening high school experience.

Academic Path
Balanced High School Learning Habits
Sparks of Interest
Logicians bring their keen intellectual enthusiasm to high school academics in
balanced ways. Even when completing rote or uninspiring projects, they can take a
constructive approach by searching for slices of subject matter that inspire them. For
example, an ordinary math assignment might spark a desire to create a proof for the
mathematical principle at hand, or a history paper might inspire them to immerse
themselves in research and the writing process.
Ideally, such explorations enhance Logicians’ academic experiences rather than
derail them. Even if a teacher isn’t particularly supportive or open-minded, these
students can take pleasure in a subject if they find aspects of it that resonate with
them. This doesn’t mean they neglect their assignments in favor of their own passion
projects. Instead, Logicians with a balanced approach to schooling develop personal
relationships with each subject, which enables them to bring the full strength of their
intellectual curiosity and engagement to their coursework.
Finding Purpose
Given their ever-questioning minds, even the most level Logicians may grapple on a
regular basis with the issue of whether the high school experience is worthwhile. But
if they can overcome feelings of being overwhelmed or paralyzed, they can approach
their internal inquiries as opportunities to evaluate what matters to them and why –
then to re-engineer their experience accordingly. As a result, they may recognize
earlier than most whether they’re gaining essential skills and making a difference in
the ways that matter to them.

Academic Path
Even Logicians’ perceptions of high school academics can shape their experiences. If
they view high school as a valuable learning experience – or at the very least, an
essential stepping stone on the path to the lives they wish to lead – they have the
cognitive flexibility to find plenty of evidence supporting that assessment. By
adopting a balanced, positive perspective, Logicians can derive more benefit from
instructors’ feedback, feel more involved in extracurricular activities, and perhaps
even form social connections more easily.
Unbalanced High School Learning Habits
Not Fitting In
For many students, high school marks an initiation into the intricacies of social life –
specifically, how to negotiate the increasingly complex realms of friendship and
dating. Despite their best efforts, though, some Logicians might feel as if they don’t
fit in. They might be puzzled by their own awkwardness, perhaps even noting a
mismatch between everything that’s going on in their heads and what comes out of
their mouths. Because their minds make so many interesting and unexpected leaps,
what they say might come across to others as out of place or difficult to decipher.
As a result, when they try to crack a joke or connect with peers, their efforts may fall
flat, at times even causing unintended offense. In response, they might feel rejected,
which can lead to feelings of resentment or bitterness. Consequently, they might
create harsh facades for themselves, playing up their antisocial tendencies or
labeling themselves as outsiders. Weirdness can be a beautiful thing, and Logicians
– like all personality types – should learn how to embrace and work with their unique
traits. That said, when Logicians exaggerate their eccentricities as a defense
mechanism – fabricating an identity for themselves as someone who “will never fit

Academic Path
in” – they close themselves off from opportunities to connect with others on an
authentic level.
Lack of Tolerance
In high school, less mature Logicians may disregard the opinions of people they
deem “boring,” “conventional,” or “unintelligent.” In some cases, it’s a defense
mechanism, with Logicians’ own insecurity triggering them to air contempt for people
who strike them as inferior. In other cases, they may not appreciate that other people
can learn, function, and even make great contributions without ascribing to the
logical, unemotional thought processes that Logicians admire.
Aside from social effects, a lack of tolerance can hamstring Logicians’ learning efforts.
Group projects – a requirement in many high school classes – are meant to teach
students how to collaborate effectively. But Logician students’ prickliness can
hamper cooperation, even prevent them from gaining important life skills.
In addition, their snap judgments of others can blind them to the contributions that
their instructors and classmates can make to their lives. Classmates assigned to
group projects with Logicians may have interesting, important perspectives to
contribute, even if they initially struggle to communicate their insights in ways that
Logicians appreciate. Unless these types stop underestimating their peers, they’ll set
themselves up for a lifetime of insular, closed-minded thought – which doesn’t
resonate with their essential curiosity and openness. When Logicians close
themselves off to different views and types of people (no matter how silly they may
seem at first), they’re also closing themselves off to a greater wealth of knowledge.

Academic Path
Rebalancing High School Learning Habits
Social Studies
Are Logician students who speak their minds – even when it entails saying something
hurtful, biting, or snide to classmates or teachers – happier than those who embrace
a bit of diplomacy? Everyone is different, so the answer is more complicated than
“yes” or “no.” Those whose past efforts to connect with others have fallen flat might
feel reluctant to return to diplomacy and consideration, fearing that they’ll be
rejected again. And it’s possible that some students truly do feel better after venting
their frustrations and putting others down.
But those Logicians may not be acknowledging the other costs of their behavior:
isolation, loneliness, lack of social support, and lost opportunities for mentorship and
collaboration. Although some Logician high school students might argue that they
don’t need social support, it is incredibly valuable when they’re embarking on new
paths and ideas, dealing with difficult life events, and even achieving lifelong goals.
Many Logicians have never consciously observed and tracked what works and what
doesn’t when it comes to establishing social connections with others. To more
rigorously study the benefits and costs of different approaches, they can draw on the
scientific process and create experiments. This can help them understand the effects
of their social behavior beyond how it feels in the moment, enabling them to design
high school experiences that meet their needs while still allowing them to be
themselves.
Here’s how they can get started.
• Choose a “lab notebook” in which to record observations.

Academic Path
• Identify a question that the experiment can answer – for example, “What are
the effects of saying something supportive or validating to a classmate I
usually disagree with?”
• Create a hypothesis for the above question. Decide how to measure the
results.
• Note the results.
• Revisit the hypothesis and revise accordingly.
• Look for trends rather than rely on a single experiment. The scientific method
requires follow-up experiments to verify results and refine insights.
Social change takes time. By reframing opportunities for self-examination as
experiments, Logicians can gain insight into themselves and their behavior. The
insights can motivate them to act in accordance with their longer-term interests
rather than how they feel in the moment.
Tutoring to Learn
It’s often the case that the best way to learn is to teach. Logicians can bolster under-
developed social skills and simultaneously manage their potential for arrogance by
tutoring other students. Not only does tutoring help Logicians organize and focus
their thoughts, but tutoring relationships also allow them to engage others with a
utilitarian purpose. The tutoring experience can help them improve their social
abilities and come to recognize their peers as whole, multidimensional individuals.
It’s important that these students measure the success of such an engagement by
how well they help the others involved; otherwise, it’s just another exercise in
smugness. Being able to do the work is one thing; helping someone else understand
the work forces Logicians to understand the person as well. This is a useful first step

Academic Path
to social growth. Moreover, if they succeed in helping another student, they’re likely
to get a taste of friendly gratitude. This might not be something they actively seek,
but it’s universally enjoyed and can give them a reason to continue making efforts to
build interpersonal skills.
Here are some ways for Logicians to get started.
• Look for opportunities to tutor: a classmate who’s bemoaning a recent bad
grade, a family member who’s struggling with a new subject, or a local
organization that needs tutors or mentors for younger students.
• As soon as an opportunity arises, seize it. Ask whether the person is interested
in help and, if so, how soon they can start.
• Once the tutoring relationship begins, take notes on what works and what
doesn’t. If someone struggles with a subject, investigate the deeper reasons
why, rather than assuming their cognitive abilities are to blame. In other
words, get to know each tutee as an individual with different strengths, talents,
interests, communication styles, and learning preferences.
Through the experience of tutoring, Logicians can learn a great deal, including how
best to communicate with a range of different people and how to appreciate others’
unique gifts. Such “soft skills” can have a powerful impact on their future success and
happiness, helping them transform into stronger communicators, more respectful
collaborators and friends, and less lonely people overall.
Work or College?
The question of whether to attend college is important. For some, higher education
is a natural move that requires little forethought. For many others, the decision is

Academic Path
decidedly less automatic. The sometimes prohibitively high cost of higher education
can cause people to question whether it’s a worthwhile investment. So-called “gap
years” are becoming a popular option, allowing students time to earn money, gain
life experience, or attend to family needs before attending university.
Although all students must examine their motives for going to college, Logicians
especially benefit from deep reflection on the issue. Given their wide-ranging
intellectual curiosity and their ever-present desire to be rational, the decision may
feel particularly charged to them. As a first step, they might wish to ask themselves
the following two questions.
• “Will a degree be necessary for the work I want to pursue?”
• “Will I gain something intangible yet valuable from going to college?”
For Logicians, higher education can have value beyond conferring a degree. Colleges
and universities offer access to equipment and resources – from research grants and
lab equipment to database access and photography dark rooms – that Logicians
might otherwise have difficulty accessing. University professors can also be valuable
resources, offering mentorship, insight, and perhaps even professional
opportunities. Logicians may also find that higher education offers time and space
to identify and work toward their goals.
That said, other Logicians may find it easier to explore their futures without the stress
of tuition payments and an organized curriculum. They might wish to explore their
interests in tandem with earning a living, knowing they can attend school in the
future if they wish.

Academic Path
Balanced Decision-Making
Looking for Knowledge in All the Right Places
Logicians with a balanced approach to education understand that their love for
knowledge can be reignited through formal education or through on-the-job
learning. When deciding whether to attend college, they allow their passion to lead
them wherever they can gain the most useful – and most interesting – experience.
If Logicians’ long-term goals require a degree, then the answer is relatively clear.
Although enterprising individuals might find loopholes that allow them to pursue
such careers without spending years in academia, those who desire a profession in
science, engineering, information technology, medicine, law, education, or any
number of complex fields may find that earning a degree is the most expedient route
to their destination, and sometimes the only one.
In other fields, hands-on work experience may provide an education that surpasses
what can be taught within the walls of a classroom. In addition, leaping into the
workforce can offer Logicians a great deal of independence, particularly if they
experiment with entrepreneurship. Although risky in some respects, the approach
offers Logicians the freedom to follow their passions, change their minds, and gain
the unique insights that come from making mistakes – all without racking up a tuition
bill. Whichever path they choose, mature Logicians recognize the pros and cons of
each option, then veer toward the option that satisfies their curiosity and helps them
work toward their lifetime goals.

Academic Path
Flexibility When Needed
Open-minded and self-evaluative, Logician students have the flexibility required to
recognize when they need to switch tracks. Perhaps they embark on a higher
education path only to find it’s not for them, or they enter the workforce and
eventually realize they need or want to go back to school. Either way, those who
remain open to change can adapt to the circumstances of their lives.
Given their independence, Logicians are unlikely to be swayed by social pressure,
popular opinion, or consensus about what it takes to be “successful.” Therefore, they
won’t feel obligated to stick with the path they initially chose solely to impress or
satisfy others. In addition, they may recognize unconventional options that break the
stereotypical college-or-workplace binary. They might travel the world, apprentice
with skilled craftspeople or laborers to learn trades, work in quasi-academic settings,
join foreign aid organizations, or try a slew of different part-time jobs at once. Or they
might find ways to work and study at the same time, charting professional
trajectories that are enhanced by their studies. Logicians can explore different
options, changing course until they find paths that truly suit them.
Unbalanced Decision-Making
The Know-It-All
If they indulge in arrogance rather than cultivate their innate openness, students with
the Logician personality type may come to mistake unfounded opinions for true
knowledge. Not recognizing that they have room to grow and improve, they can end
up with an unbalanced view of their own abilities. In some cases, the “know-it-all”
mindset can lead them to dismiss college as useless; in other cases, they might deem
entering the workplace “beneath them.”

Academic Path
Both views are toxic. Logicians who assume that higher education or the working
world has nothing to teach them are – in a word – wrong. Although one path or the
other might be preferable for a given individual, anyone can glean at least some
benefit from either choice.
Whether enrolling in school or choosing immediate entry into the workforce,
Logicians who decide that they “already know enough” absolutely cement their
ignorance. When these types allow a lack of humility to stifle their learning, they let
their worst characteristics dictate their future.
Chaos Ensues
Logicians are admirably curious, but if their curiosity yields endless distractions, it
can halt their progress through life. Although it’s wonderful that they’re flexible
enough to shift paths when necessary, they also must ensure that they don’t give up
on a given path – either college or a career – too soon. Otherwise, they might leave
before they’ve finished important projects, gained key experience, or even allowed
themselves time to fully appreciate the situation.
Logicians can easily lose focus because they become so enthused with new things –
and, at times, disillusioned with old things. Alas, flitting from one place to another
doesn’t give them the best chance at success, especially early in life. Without at least
some constancy, their experiences and knowledge can remain shallow, leaving them
unprepared when deeper skills are required. It’s easy for Logicians to take an interest
in learning, but if they constantly change directions, they may end up disappointed
by their lack of progress.

Academic Path
Rebalancing Decision-Making
Opening Up
Logician students can’t decide on the right path if they don’t have reasonable pictures
of the paths they have to choose from. They limit their understanding when they
assume they already have the information they need. These types might consider
rebalancing any inflated sense of their knowledge, freeing their minds to evaluate
new perspectives.
To access the insight and wisdom that can only come from experience, Logicians can
speak with people who have taken different paths – whether professional or
academic. They might even “adopt” mentors in different spheres. Knowledge is
powerful when it comes to decision-making, and mentors can offer knowledge that
these individuals couldn’t gain elsewhere.
Nothing provides perspective like witnessing potential and plausible directions
through the eyes of someone who has already been there. Such perspective might
even inspire Logicians to project themselves onto a successful trajectory as they view
the possibilities through the lens of their self-confidence. This can help with work,
college, or postgraduate considerations.
Here are some tips for Logicians interested in exploring different paths.
• Decide before starting that making such an important decision is dynamic, and
understand that concrete answers are likely to form only after an extended
period of active exploration. In other words, there are no easy answers, and
good mentors don’t typically provide shortcuts.

Academic Path
• It’s fine not to have a specific goal, at least in the beginning. Avoid obsessing
over one target more than necessary. That’s why “mentors” is plural. Talk to
(or read about) a variety of experienced people.
• For Logicians interested in professional exploration, look for organizations
that provide career mentoring. Ask friends and family members whether they
know people in related professional spheres.
• Logicians interested in learning about specific jobs might also seek out
summer internships or other job-shadowing opportunities in those fields.
Such experiences can be immensely helpful in trying to determine whether
they need – or wish – to attend college.
• Those interested in exploring academic options can reach out to alumni from
their secondary schools who have pursued different types of higher education.
Often, high school guidance counselors can facilitate such connections.
Logicians can even reach out to professors in fields of interest. Although
replies aren’t guaranteed, many professors are happy to speak or correspond
with potential students, and faculty contact information is generally available
online.
Although the Internet and other resources can provide information about a career
or professional direction, there’s nothing like exploring such things with someone
who has already been there. Because mentors and advisors can answer specific
questions, they can tailor information to Logicians in personal ways.
Knowing When to Stay
Other types might struggle to change their approach if work, or college isn’t what
they expected. Many Logicians may experience the opposite issue, questioning their
choices so early and so often that they make themselves miserable with doubt.

Academic Path
Beneath their opinionated exteriors, those with imbalanced self-esteem may second-
guess themselves to a painful extent. The internal unease can lead them to give up
on the path they choose – whether the workforce or college – before they haven’t
given it a fair chance.
Developing a philosophy that recognizes every experience as having value can help.
Instead of deciding a path is “wrong” as soon as it doesn’t feel good, perhaps a better
approach is to approach the experience as a worthy experiment, taking time to
examine it rigorously before leaping to a conclusion. A sample size of one doesn’t
stand up.
Here are some questions to consider while navigating the process.
• What are the consequences of staying this course for another year?
o What are the costs?
o What is the worst-case scenario?
o What is the best-case scenario?
• What is the potential of staying the course?
o Is that potential worth the costs and consequences?
• Are you isolating yourself from mentors, peers, or others who could help you
better benefit from the experience?
o If so, what is a concrete first step you could take today to connect with
them?
After contemplating the questions above, Logicians can then decide how long to wait
before deciding. Perhaps rather than sitting in on a single day of classes, they could
audit an entire course to see whether their assumptions hold true. Or perhaps they

Academic Path
can commit to a year at a particular job and set a calendar reminder to assess their
decision in a year’s time.
By writing down answers to the questions (and ideally sharing their insights with an
insightful friend or advisor), Logicians can break out of the mental echo chamber that
leads them to question their decisions reflexively rather than reflectively. It can help
them gain the insight and strength required to take a positive next step – whether
that means staying the course or moving on to something new.
Logicians in College
For Logicians who choose to attend college, higher education offers an excellent
environment in which to test their limits. People with this personality type live for a
good challenge, and college can certainly offer gratifying opportunities for growth
and development. Those who enjoyed a positive high school experience often find
that college provides even greater opportunities for intellectual growth. Meanwhile,
those who felt constrained by high school might be pleasantly surprised by the
relative freedom and breadth and depth of courses that college may afford.
Balanced Approach to College
Broad Interests
In college, Logicians’ wide-ranging curiosity serves them well. Thumbing through a
course catalog can be an exercise in fascination, as they discover a plentitude of
course offerings and extracurricular activities to capture their interests. College
environments that encourage interdisciplinary studies can be especially gratifying for
people with this personality type. By bridging different disciplines, such studies offer

Academic Path
Logicians an opportunity to think outside the box and make unexpected connections
– two of their favorite intellectual maneuvers.
If they carry that sense of engagement to required courses and prerequisites,
Logician students stand to gain even more from their college experience. Although
they may prefer the courses they elect over predetermined requirements, those who
allow their imaginations to be sparked by all their classes, even those that lie outside
their interests, set themselves up for an especially enjoyable learning experience. At
any rate, Logicians with a balanced approach to college curricula refuse to allow a
handful of courses to tarnish the intellectual enjoyment the college experience can
provide.
Kindred Spirits
For Logician students, learning is paramount. Their earnest approach to education
may not have won them favor in high school, particularly if they found themselves in
an environment where academic interests weren’t considered “cool.” However, they
can ideally choose a college where their classmates have developed some maturity
and decided to value their education. Logicians in college might even enjoy
opportunities to connect on an intellectual level with their professors, from office
hours to student–faculty social events.
This can be a welcome change for Logicians, especially if they find people who share
their less-common interests. They also might delight in encountering people who
don’t share their interests, as they can open Logicians’ eyes to new thoughts and
fascinations. Such new connections can evolve into friendships and collaborations
that offer these students the inspiration and fresh ideas they so crave.

Academic Path
Unbalanced Approach to College
Narrowed Horizons
If they decide to pursue college, Logicians with outsized egos can inadvertently limit
their academic horizons. They may allow their strong views to limit their choice of
courses, leading them to focus on those they’ve decided are “worthwhile.” They might
even blow off required courses that don’t align with their personal interests.
To put it bluntly, Logicians who resent required courses or write off entire fields of
study are wasting their energy – and their potential. Required courses, when
approached in the right spirit, can lay the groundwork for skills that serve them
throughout their lives. Such skills might lead to professional opportunities in the
future, or they might simply be interesting to learn. Unless they force themselves into
unknown terrain – which entails opening their minds to fields of study that don’t
immediately seem “useful” or “rational” – Logicians will stay stuck in their comfort
zones, severely limiting their personal growth.
Questioning Everything, Respecting Nothing
If they don’t balance their self-respect with respect for others, these types might take
on a confrontational, argumentative style that interferes with learning. When they
fixate on the minor fallacies that abound everywhere – whether in a professor’s
lecture or a published textbook – they miss the bigger picture. They may be so caught
up in competitive intellectual sparring over principles or semantics that they ignore
broad truths with less-than-defined edges. If Logicians argue over details endlessly,
teachers and peers may simply move on without them.

Academic Path
The source of the imbalance can be deep-seated insecurity. When Logicians feel a
need to prove themselves right, they may go to great lengths to externalize this
insecurity by questioning others. Logic can easily be misused as a weapon. Even if
Logician students win the argument, what they win is merely an inflated sense of self,
as beating people in arguments does little to advance their minds or bring in new
knowledge – or ensure academic progress. Teachers and fellow students alike can
quickly tire of Logicians who focus more on correcting others than on fairly
considering diverse opinions or new information.
Rebalancing Their Approach to College
Learning from Everything
For Logicians, there are concrete benefits to finding inherent value even in subjects
that seem dull or pointless – and yes, this includes prerequisites and required
courses. Given the increased maturity they bring to college, people with this
personality type seek opportunities for personal development and growth in such
courses and assignments. For example, the detail-orientation and memorization that
a more strictly defined course requires might help Logicians become better at
tolerating and dealing with the mundane – a key component of mindfulness.
With that mindset, many worthwhile things may happen. First, Logicians may gain
the discipline that provides much-needed balance to their intellectual enthusiasm.
They may learn the value of being stricter with themselves when it comes to life’s
more insistent details. Moreover, they can view the hours spent in such classes as
valuable rather than a useless and artificial waste of time. With time, their
perceptions of a class may change from tragically hollow to authentically worthwhile.
To enhance the process, Logicians can try the following exercise.

Academic Path
• Identify a subject that doesn’t feel particularly interesting or worthwhile,
especially if it’s a required course. Meet with an instructor who specializes in
the subject, with the goal of better understanding their vision and inspiration.
• Ask the person questions: “Why would someone become a ____ (pathologist,
geographer, Shakespeare scholar)?” “What’s special or meaningful about the
subject?” “What challenges does the field address, and how can it benefit
humankind?”
• Take mental notes based on your conversations. Use the insights therein as
reminders of the value inherent in other courses and subjects.
Through investigation and inquiry, Logicians might just discover new passions of
their own.
Respecting Other Views
When learning, Logicians may disregard the opinions of people they consider less
intelligent. However, true learning requires gaining perspectives different from those
one already holds. Rejecting other perspectives only results in ignorance. Yes, other
perspectives may sometimes be false, but students can still learn by considering
them. After all, knowledge and truth can be found in fiction as readily as any
documentary. Seekers often find treasures in the least expected places. Openness to
others is the key to broadening understanding.
Being proven wrong themselves is unpleasant, and Logicians may believe that they’re
right no matter what – even if they haven’t proven it yet. But they can learn to
suspend their judgments and take time to weigh others’ theories and ideas honestly.
Deep consideration earns them the right to hold strong opinions, as well as the
conviction to stick with them.

Academic Path
When Logicians open themselves to others’ perspectives, they also open themselves
to a greater wealth of knowledge. When they humble themselves appropriately, they
establish a strong foundation that makes their opinions and arguments strong. A
sharp wit can carry them only so far in life if they don’t back it up with well-rounded
evidence and insight. A willingness to prove verifiable ideas is an excellent way to
continually gain knowledge.
Logicians can try the following experiment to apply scrutiny to ideas and beliefs.
• Pick a favorite topic – the stronger your opinion about the topic, the better.
• Using the Internet or any other reference source, find three opposing points
of view. You might be surprised at your own internal resistance to
acknowledging confirmation bias, but you can lean on your contrarian attitude
to help push through it.
• Within those opposing voices, find at least one valid point that each makes.
Rarely are people totally wrong, and there’s likely at least one point to
appreciate. That doesn’t require embracing the point, just simply
acknowledging that the perspective has some merit.
• Consider what other ideas might deserve the same scrutiny. The more people
test an idea, the more accurate that idea is likely to be. That holds as well for
day-to-day disagreement as it does for peer review in the scientific method.
By recognizing that many viewpoints have valid components, Logicians can learn to
respect peers and instructors whose approach to learning – and overall
understanding of the world around them – is different from their own. After all, only
by questioning any knee-jerk dismissals of other opinions can Logicians truly earn
the right to consider themselves open-minded.

Academic Path
Lifelong Learning
Lifelong learning goes well beyond the rigors of school. Logicians might find
themselves drawn to hobbies, side interests, experiments, clubs, activities, travel
adventures, and classes that challenge them to learn and grow through all stages of
their lives. People with this personality type recognize knowledge and understanding
as valuable pursuits in their own rights, and they know how to follow their curiosity
wherever it leads – even if there isn’t a clear-cut academic path for them to follow. As
a result, lifelong learning can be a source of endless enjoyment and opportunity for
Logicians.
Balanced Lifelong Learning
Enthusiastic Exploration
Self-aware Logicians understand that even though they have a strong desire to
explore new things, it may take some time to find ways to learn outside the classroom
that truly enthuses them. To move things along, they can leverage their sharp minds,
trying out many things until they find the right one. Anything from taking an improv
class to making a podcast might tickle their fancy, but they won’t know until they try
them. When things don’t work out, Logicians can simply tuck away the knowledge
gained and try something else.
They’re never at a loss for something that grabs their interest and drives them to
learn more about it. When it comes to lifelong learning, they do well to not only
thoughtfully follow their passions but also take a rational look at the benefits of
varying paths – beyond just initial appeal. Of course, “Because I want to try it,” can be
a perfectly good reason to sign up for a class or take on a new activity.

Academic Path
Practice, Focus, and Consistency
When well-adjusted Logicians find areas of learning they enjoy – whether composing
sonatas or training for memory competitions – they stick with them. This can be a
challenge, particularly when they reach a plateau in their progress. At that point, their
initial enthusiasm might wane, and other activities might start to look awfully
appealing. By forging through that stage, Logicians can cultivate focus; find the
enjoyment inherent in applying themselves and testing their limits, and reap the
rewards of diligent, consistent learning.
As they mature, Logician students come to understand how precious it is when they
find a subject inspiring. As a result, they dig in with both hands and unrelenting
curiosity, knowing that they can always go deeper in their learning. They avoid
distractions – or incorporate them – and manage their attention, attending to only
those things that they can fold into their learning.
Unbalanced Lifelong Learning
Going It Alone
We can teach ourselves many things, and online videos and Web content are a boon
for would-be autodidacts. That said, some things are much more easily learned in
the presence of others. This can be hard for Logicians to swallow, particularly if they
assume they “know best” and can work out everything on their own. Even Logicians
who recognize the value of others’ wisdom and experience might shy away from in-
person learning environments, perhaps feeling a degree of nervousness or anxiety
about being face-to-face with others.

Academic Path
Their independence can certainly be commendable, but if they try to learn everything
on their own, their paths may be needlessly convoluted and difficult. They may fall
into ruts, not truly moving forward with their passions because they don’t have
anyone on the outside encouraging them to do so. Then there’s good, old-fashioned
“reinventing the wheel,” which can be rewarding but can also slow progress
considerably.
In some cases, Logicians may dismiss instructors for irrelevant reasons – for
example, they might not be impressed by a woodworking teacher’s written
communications, or they might think their creative writing instructor is too irrational.
Such judgments can prevent Logicians from pairing up with instructors or programs
that would allow them to take their interests to the next level. As a result, Logicians
may become frustrated, even to the point of giving up entirely on outside learning
experiences. Moreover, by avoiding group environments, they miss out on
opportunities to learn from their peers.
Giving Up Too Soon
When asked what they’d most like to learn, Logicians aren’t hard pressed to come up
with at least a few answers. Their wide-ranging enthusiasm is among their greatest
strengths, but if it isn’t matched by consistency, healthy self-discipline, and the
willingness to stick with difficult pursuits, it won’t get them anywhere. Even worse: A
series of “failed” experiences can erode their self-respect.
Most Logicians find it easier to start something than to finish it. There’s nothing
inherently wrong with that – in fact, it enables them to stand out as creative
visionaries. But if they don’t push past the internal resistance that arises whenever a
project becomes difficult – and it’s worth noting that this resistance might come

Academic Path
disguised as boredom or a sudden interest in a different endeavor – Logicians will flit
from one area of learning to another, embracing a succession of short-lived hobbies.
After a period of years or decades, they may look back and realize that they’ve
scratched the surface of a great many subjects but never achieved true depth or
mastery in any of them.
Rebalancing Lifelong Learning
Humans Are Social Animals
Although they can learn much in solitude, Logicians may find that lifelong learning is
more effective when they involve others. This might entail drawing upon relevant
teachers, seeking group learning environments, or simply attending talks and events.
As an added benefit, interpersonal avenues to learning offer Logicians opportunities
to hear new ideas and consider new perspectives.
When they open their minds and drop their biases, most Logicians can see quite
clearly that they can learn and enjoy stimulating conversations with all manner of
people. Moreover, they can offer their own insights in return. That model of learning
is informal, egalitarian, and dynamic – three qualities that suit these students well.
By incorporating others into their learning experiences, people with this personality
type can enjoy the concrete as well as the ineffable benefits of a social approach to
learning.
To begin looking at learning from a more social perspective, Logicians can try the
following.
• Look for non-traditional learning opportunities, such as local meetups, talks,
and events.

Academic Path
• When considering and evaluating instructors, keep an open mind. Take on the
intellectual challenge of figuring out everything they can teach, rather than the
easier track of focusing on their limitations.
• Search out opportunities to learn and grow during each interpersonal
interaction, and prioritize in-person learning experiences whenever possible.
Honoring your Introversion is important, but so is stretching your comfort
zones to add dimensions to your life, and the social side of learning may
provide one of those stretches.
• When taking classes, look for interactive options. Lectures from podiums and
somewhat passive audiences often limit social opportunities, other than
getting to know the back of someone else’s head in the auditorium. Activity-
based classes provide great opportunities for communal learning.
For Logicians, there’s nothing wrong with taking an Introverted, independent
approach – if they feel they get what they need. However, if they want to expand their
lives and accelerate their learning, they may want to explore the social dimensions
of learning.
Making Space for Learning
When a learning experience loses its initial gleam, Logicians may feel frustrated,
uninspired, or vaguely disappointed. That’s natural, but unless they reclaim their
initial enthusiasm for the subject, they run the risk of giving up entirely. Many find
themselves falling into the rut of trying to distract themselves or numb out by
repeatedly absorbing themselves in passive entertainment – such as watching TV,
playing video games, browsing the Internet, or using a smartphone. Although such
activities are gratifying in the moment, they can crowd out learning and other
experiences that Logicians would find more enriching.

Academic Path
To be sure, there’s nothing inherently wrong with indulging in passive entertainment.
In fact, movies, TV shows, and video games can offer inspiration in no small measure.
The danger comes when Logicians fail to set boundaries around the activities,
allowing idle engagement to absorb time and energy that they might otherwise
spend on their passions. And when they’ve spent enough time away from an activity
or project that once mattered to them, they might find it surprisingly difficult to get
back on the horse.
To make more time for learning in their lives, Logicians can experiment with an
“entertainment ban.”
• Identify a form of entertainment that takes up more time in your daily life than
one would like.
• Choose a side project, learning experience, or hobby that’s a high priority.
Ensure that everything needed to pursue the project, such as supplies, books,
or other resources, are available.
• Ban the form of entertainment identified in the first step for a predetermined
period (anywhere from a weekend to a month – what matters is that it’s an
achievable amount of time and that it’s adhered to.)
• Use at least some of the time and attention that would have been devoted to
the form of entertainment to pursue the identified interest.
• If desired, track how many hours recovered during the experiment, or find
another way to measure progress.
By engaging with this exercise, Logicians might be surprised at the amount of time
and energy they can devote to things they’ve wanted to do – and how powerful the
grip of passive entertainment really is.

Academic Path
Conclusion
Inspired Learning
Logicians don’t desire knowledge alone; they desire accuracy and precision. Well-
rounded Logicians know that, to make an argument, they need not only facts but also
a grounded sense of reality and vast stores of experience – both their own and
others’. They don’t just want to search for a better way; they want to find it. To that
end, there’s no substitute for dedicated learning. Whether this means an ongoing
traditional education, learning on the job, or engaging personal passions with active
attention, people with this personality type place themselves where they can
constantly learn, grow, and feed their intellect with diverse ideas as well as concrete
evidence.
For Logicians, learning can be a lifelong source of inspiration and enjoyment. Few
other types enjoy the rush of energy and pleasure that they get when they dive
headlong into subjects they find fascinating. Whatever stage of education they find
themselves in, their challenge is to find sustainable ways to channel their fascination
and maintain it over time. This might entail finding an accountability partner, seeking
out a mentor, or setting up an entertainment ban.
Although these types might initially feel resistant about prioritizing in-person
learning, the payoff is well worth it. By opening their minds to the ways that teachers
and peers enhance their learning experience, Logicians can accelerate their
educational progress and promote their self-development on many levels. That said,
they also can use their independent streak to identify what truly matters to them,
cultivating focus and discipline so they can devote themselves to subjects and
endeavors they find fascinating. Thoughtful and adaptable, Logicians can design

Academic Path
academic paths that not only help them acquire important skills but also enrich their
lives.

Professional Development
Professional development takes place across all stages of life, from early education
through retirement, and it’s interwoven with personal growth. Gaining increased self-
understanding – by determining values, goals, strengths, and weaknesses – helps
Logicians decide what career paths to pursue and how to pursue them. We think the
best way to gain this understanding is by examining personality type.
Because Logicians are such a rare personality type, one of their foremost challenges
is finding careers that align with their intellectual ideals in a world that often seems
at odds with them. Because there’s no one career or field best suited for these types,
they should consider aspects of any job that interests them to ensure compatibility
with their values and strengths.
Throughout this chapter, we’ll discuss the benefits of understanding Logician traits
and using them to maintain balance and excellence in their professional
development. We’ll look at what often causes them to become frustrated at work, as
well as how they can utilize their strengths to regain balance and thrive in their

careers. Ultimately, we hope this guide can give Logicians the understanding and
tools needed to pursue professional growth.
Uncovering Possibilities
Among personality traits shared by all Logicians, one of the most prominent is their
love for theorizing methods and ideas. “Innovator,” “genius,” “philosopher” – most
Logicians have been complimented with these terms at some point in their lives. Like
other Analysts, they’re unstoppable when given a chance to combine their knowledge
with their imagination. Even if their chosen profession has no direct links with
technology, they’re adept at utilizing available technological tools in ways that not
only excite their imagination but also increase their efficiency.
The best careers for Logicians turn these traits into meaningful strengths, as very few
other personality types enjoy theory as much as they do. They’re usually fascinated
by research, patterns, hypotheses, possibilities, and options. Often, they have many
grand dreams and ambitions. They thrive in jobs where they can combine their
imagination, inquisitiveness, and rational thinking skills.
Thriving on Theory and Design
Whatever their jobs, Logicians often say they enjoy their careers when they allow
them to creatively find and analyze underlying principles and ideas, like in problem-
solving. Many career paths enable them to utilize those skills, though they often
come with practical applications that don’t interest them. Logicians can be great
corporate strategists, business analysts, video game designers, programmers, and
architects.

These types are designers by mindset and explorers at heart. Nothing fascinates
them more than engineering models, be they physical or intellectual – Logicians see
their environment as something that can be understood and optimized. Their
introspective reasoning skills give them a distinct advantage when it comes to
intellectual pursuits, and they bring those abilities to any job. Whether in a high-rise
tower on Wall Street or a coffee shop on Main Street, Logicians have little trouble
making an impact and finding success.
Unbound Imagination
People with this personality type often struggle with job roles that require long-term
composure. These types are excited to see what comes next, and that may morph
into impatience for routines, procedures, or lengthy waits for outcomes. When their
inquisitive drive can gain traction and keep them moving, Logicians can achieve
stunning results, but they sometimes suffer from distraction and disaffection.
Though these types are capable of astounding innovation when given carte blanche,
too much constraint can frustrate and interfere with their creativity. Logicians are at
their best when they have clear goals within supportive structures, but are free to
explore and experiment to hit their targets. Professional roles that provide a little
leeway allow them to achieve greatness. When given a chance to find their own
paths, even these Introverted types can lead the way for others, find useful as well
as inspired ways to accomplish any kind of work, and impress coworkers and
employers with not only their imagination but also their adaptability.

Jobs and Skill Sets
Let’s look at some specific jobs that tend to fit Logicians well. This list is by no means
comprehensive, as these types can succeed in any career they choose. By the same
token, even “suitable” jobs may not be ideal for all Logicians. Individuals must
determine what careers are the most appropriate for them, including what meets
their needs and brings them both professional fulfillment and personal happiness.
Below, each category reflects Logicians’ strengths and contains examples of careers
that can capitalize on those strengths.
Research
Logicians are passionate about discovering how things work, and they’re fond of the
patterns that often reveal themselves through research. They enjoy exploring what
no one’s studied before and finding different approaches to old disciplines. Examples
of jobs in this category include academic researcher, life scientist, astronomer,
medical researcher, physicist, and psychological researcher.
A science or research position doesn’t usually require extensive social interaction,
instead focusing on intense collaboration with a few very knowledgeable colleagues.

Logician researchers and scientists admire others with similar drive and abilities and
can collaborate if they feel they’re dealing with equals. People with this personality
type love to follow their inspiration; whether they do it alone or as part of a larger
organization, they enjoy uncovering new truths to share with the world.
Health Care
In the medical field, Logicians make thorough diagnosticians and practitioners. What
they may lack in bedside manner, they more than make up for in technical excellence.
Their traits help Logician physicians quickly assess myriad symptoms and make
accurate diagnoses. The same approach applies to the process of choosing effective
treatments. These types may also be inclined to try innovative measures should
traditional treatments fail. From pathology to podiatry, many medical fields are full
of potential puzzles to solve, to the satisfaction of many Logicians.
Although roles in health care may require more social interaction than research
positions, Logicians enjoy taking part in solving problems, and consequently may
draw significant personal satisfaction from directly helping others. For a personality
type that’s typically shaky about emotional communication, the power to heal fellow
human beings may bring them an unexpected warmth and sense of connection.
Analysis and Strategy
Logicians almost automatically explore systems by mentally dissecting them – their
Role group is called “Analysts” for a good reason. Much of what they do is strategic
in some way, but not all strategic positions neatly fit into categories. Some examples
include business or corporate strategist, management consultant, project developer,
educational consultant, and stock/investment analyst.

Predicting the future is a process of careful data collection, not magic, but the brilliant
ways that Logicians assemble and interpret data can seem spellbinding – it’s no
mistake that their name is a portmanteau, or hybrid, of “logic magician.” Of course,
putting their skills to use requires underlying familiarity with the subject matter, so
many such careers require specific education. For example, a master’s degree in
business administration, or MBA, would open many doors on Wall Street, and a
degree in education could lead to academic consulting.
The Arts
No exploration of Logicians’ career options would be complete without considering
the arts, especially if they can break through preconceptions and delve into the
unconventional. Their emotional expression may often be subtle, but this does
nothing to diminish their creativity. Those who feel pulled toward any traditional arts
may best explore their ability and passion by experimenting with new ideas. If their
hearts are it, they can excel at anything, especially if it feeds into their intellect and
desire to learn.
Of course, examining the arts is also right up their alley, so jobs like museum curator
and art historian may be good fits. A related degree is a great foundation, but
Logicians are most likely led by their enthusiasm, be it for writing, painting, music, or
another art form. In fact, they may find creative arts are effective conduits for
expression when words seem inadequate. Logicians aren’t all numbers and logic;
their active, inquisitive minds can just as easily bloom amid color, form, and song as
hard facts and data.

Challenging Career Qualities
In modern society, we spend lots of time at work, and careers often give meaning to
our lives. Logicians would be wise to avoid getting stuck in situations that don’t suit
them, as doing so puts them at risk for all manner of difficulties. Though anything is
possible, the following are some job characteristics that may not be enjoyable for
most Logicians.
Restrictive Environments
When it comes to the way they process information and gain insight, people with this
personality type do their best work with a little mental room to “play.” To function at
their fullest, Logicians need independence and supportive, guiding structure, not
oppressive supervision – they hate arbitrary restrictions. They also may reject career
paths that seem to be “pre-set,” as they don’t want to feel locked in. They’re typically
happy just doing work they’re passionate about without being pushed in specific
directions.
Logicians like to experiment and explore new ideas. If their workplace structure and
rules are too rigid, they tend to feel stifled and unfulfilled. These passionate puzzle-
solvers aren’t happy when restrictions prevent them from experimentation and
exploration. However, sometimes the slog may ultimately be worth it, if the payoff is
exciting enough. Logicians should do some mental math on the cost/benefit ratio
when considering more rigid work environments.
Too Much Face Time
Many Logicians perceive other people as perplexing, occasionally bothersome
distractions – and being distracted is already a notable challenge for these types. In

addition to being led astray by their thought processes, they may lose their focus
because of their coworkers. Like any Introverted type, Logicians can become
exhausted working with others for too long.
This doesn’t mean that they should avoid any job where they’re required to interact
with others regularly. It’s just that those with careers that involve social interaction
may need to develop their social skills and their organizational techniques. They can
benefit from learning ways to decompress and re-energize after prolonged social
interaction, especially when their job requires extensive human contact.
Lacking in Intellectual Stimulation
Challenges and new truths excite Logicians’ intellect, but people with this personality
type tend to detest routine, and they do whatever they can to avoid mind-numbing
tasks. They’re independent (even somewhat eccentric), hold themselves to
exemplary standards, and dislike rote job roles, especially later in their careers.
Unfortunately, their self-inspired direction isn’t always seen as attractive in a modern
world that prizes predictability.
Logicians are most satisfied with their careers when they garner intellectual
stimulation. They’re relatively relaxed when it comes to setting goals for themselves,
but their thirst for knowledge is unquenchable, and their curiosity doesn’t wait for
the workday to end. Consequently, following career paths that aren’t interesting is
likely to make them restless and frustrated. Unlike some other personality types,
Logicians rarely, if ever, satisfy their desire for understanding; they’re always looking
for new puzzles, and they refuse to accept unsatisfying answers.

Environments of High Emotion
These types are neither very comfortable around, nor skilled at, emotional displays.
But where there are humans, there are inevitably emotions and drama. Job roles that
expose them to constant emotion can make them feel awkwardly ill-equipped, or
even drive them inward and interfere with their job performance. For example, a
sales environment that thrives on forced cheer may feel artificial to Logicians, who
value substance over style.
This isn’t to say that they can’t distinguish themselves as valued islands of reason
amid emotionally turbulent settings. It’s just that such efforts may be a constant drain
on their attention and resources, which they prefer to invest in environments more
receptive to their brand of progress. This issue isn’t incumbent to any specific jobs;
it’s more a matter of workplace environment and culture, two things Logicians may
want to keep an eye on when considering any employers’ offers.
Career Alternatives

Anything Is Possible
Sometimes Logicians may not be able to advance in a specific workplace, either
because their employers don’t value their unique traits or because there just isn’t
room for growth. Aside from changing employers, there are alternative options –
some of them unexpected – for those who find themselves in such situations.
Self-Employment
People don’t have to be employed in the traditional sense to live comfortably. In an
age of possibilities, selling one’s time to a corporation isn’t the only way to generate
income. Logicians are creative, versatile individuals, and thanks to their ability to
innovate and make unexpected connections, they can thrive in self-employment and
as entrepreneurs. Anything from a massage license to a freelance consulting contract
can provide paths to independence.
Furthermore, self-employment eliminates certain hurdles for Logicians, such as
forced integration into other people’s structure. Self-employed individuals can
choose which tasks they want to perform and which they want to outsource.
Therefore, independent Logicians can sidestep some of their pet peeves, including
following orders, doing tedious work, and dealing with people who are unable or
unwilling to improve. Working for themselves offers many significant benefits to
those with this personality type, and such individuals can be highly successful on
their terms.
Combined Resource Systems
When considering self-employment, Logicians must be willing to experiment and fail
along the way. One excellent option for these types to go into business for

themselves with less risk is through small partnerships with one or more compatible
individuals, trading some independence for the sake of assistance, additional skills,
and shared risk. They can share liabilities and benefits, parlaying their rational views
and creativity into trusting relationships with business partners as well as clients and
customers.
Logicians must keep a close eye on details, however; while they’ll always provide their
trademark ingenuity, most business associates expect effective follow-through, too.
These types excel at generating ideas, but their business plans might benefit from
some help from another personality type who excels at handling tedious but critical
details such as accounting, planning, and organizing. Diversifying human assets is
especially important in smaller organizations, and Logicians can experience benefits
in joining forces with someone who offers what they may lack.
Hobbies: Private Refuge with Business Potential
One possible way for Logicians to find satisfaction is to transform a personal hobby
into a paid endeavor. An outlet for creative energy can help them deal with job
frustration until they can make a career change. This is an excellent idea for any
personality type, but it’s especially satisfying for Logicians, who often need to balance
professional responsibility with private endeavors to feel happy.
When these types find themselves in intellectually unrewarding jobs, the chance to
do something inspiring without the constraint of authority feels wonderful. Others
quickly notice the products of personal passions, and Logicians’ pet projects may
garner them unexpected acclaim. The benefits of developing hobbies may be
personal at first, but considering the vast potential that Logicians possess, sharing
their work can quickly become profitable.

Workplace Cooperation Between Roles

Understanding how Logicians tend to behave is one thing – getting along with myriad
colleagues effectively, across a variety of personality types, is another entirely. Now
we’ll dig deeper to determine how Logicians can best find happiness and efficiency
with their coworkers.
Logician–Analyst Cooperation
As with any combination, typical strengths and weaknesses emerge when Logicians
work alongside other Analysts. When the people involved are mature and balance
their visions with realism, the results can be stunning and very enjoyable. Although
mutual thinking may create notable advancement in certain directions, this
personality pair may ignore other critical elements. Awareness can help restore
balance, though, so we’ll look at how Logicians can consciously moderate negative
potentials in this working relationship.

Balanced Cooperation
Creative and Logical Language
Logicians and other Analysts often find themselves “speaking the same language.”
Both types tend to make rational arguments and engage in conceptual discussions.
Although they draw on facts, their focus is likely to be on “big picture” ideas. Logicians
and other Analysts enjoy exploring systems and concepts, engaging in “what if”
discussions with each other. They’re likely to share their ideas for improving anything
they come across, brainstorming and bouncing ideas off each other.
People with Analyst personality types tend to put little stock in emotional appeals
and subjective rationalizations, quickly spotting how such things might weaken a
business, venture, or project. If Logicians and other Analysts notice flaws or
inconsistencies in a company or its leadership, they may form a casual alliance over
such matters. Conversations between them can even be lofty, and they may find each
other’s company a relief from the tedium of social niceties, connecting instead over
their visionary tendencies and their shared interests.
Tactical Teamwork
The rapport between the two types often extends beyond language and higher
concepts into practical accomplishments, and they may find themselves leaning on
each other for rational support and inspiration to balance their imaginative worlds.
Bouncing ideas off each other, asking for advice, and cleverly teaming up are ways
they show each other respect, as well as keep each other’s feet on the ground.
Discovering better ways to implement ideas together gives both motivation to follow
through on implementation.

Logicians are unique thinkers, but they may find a feeling of kinship with other
Analysts that helps them get through the workday, as if both share a window into a
clear version of reality. This can serve as critical encouragement. Their common
perspective can bring out their productive side as they develop tactics on how to
tame tasks, whittle away at workloads, and progress professionally. Their balanced
approaches to work aren’t only compatible but also a welcome source of strength to
take ideas beyond theory together.
Unbalanced Cooperation
Too Many Ideas
Even under smooth, happy circumstances, Logicians and other Analysts may find
themselves in a quagmire of genius if they produce too many great ideas while
working together – creativity overwhelming efficiency. With each new idea requiring
resources and entailing costs, this personality twosome may become trapped in their
cleverness, seeing too many grand directions to proceed down any one road, or
taking on too many things at once.
If they sell themselves on all their own concepts, Logicians and other Analysts can
become enthused to the point of delusion. Two or more together with no moderation
may simply get lost in the clouds, and their effectiveness and output on the job can
suffer. The dark side of creativity can sometimes be chaotic inefficiency. When
working together, Analysts may not offer Logicians much hands-on pragmatism to
balance their wide-ranging imaginations.

Birds of a Feather Attacking Together
One potential downfall of the commonality these two find together is magnification
of their cynicism. Logicians may not be used to having other Analysts in the room.
Finding kinship through the harder edges of their individual intellects can encourage
both into conflict with things or other people they criticize. Although Logicians and
other Analysts aren’t prone to conflict in an emotional sense, they may become each
other’s allies in unnecessary harshness. Analysts often show scorn for others’
mistakes or flawed logic. In the workplace, validating such behavior in each other
does everyone a disservice.
One of the most unfortunate things about the symmetry between Analysts’
judgement is that neither type is likely to feel inclined to reconcile. For most other
personality types, emotional factors such as a desire for harmony and kindness in
the workplace lead them to resolve grievances. These types instead retreat into
factual war, pressing forward with narrow logic instead of opening themselves to
new views and compromise. In their efforts to claim victory using hard truths, both
Logicians and other Analysts may ignore the value of others’ feelings, regardless of
who’s right or wrong. A workplace dominated by such cold thinking can feel more
like a shark tank.
Rebalancing Cooperation
Prioritizing Together
Nothing sidelines a project faster than endlessly wrought-out discussions on theory
between Logicians and other Analysts. Established authors often advise new writers
to “murder their darlings,” or get rid of beautifully written sentences that don’t
advance the story. At times, these types may need to wisely kill off a few of their

“darling” ideas for the practical good of a project or business. Too much theoretical
modeling at work, no matter how exciting, can easily become wasteful.
Focusing on the organization’s goals goes a long way to help these types be
productive and responsible. When Logicians get too carried away with ideas, they
can rebalance with deliberate focus and follow through by inviting feedback. Some
Analysts might be a good source of such support, lending an inherently critical
nature. Additional input from authority figures or other personality types may also
be helpful. Logicians and other Analysts can try to get some perspective on their
priorities with this simple exercise.
• Jot down five to 10 current work items onto a master task list.
• Rate which can be accomplished most quickly. For example, among seven
tasks, the slowest would be rated “one,” and the fastest would be rated
“seven.”
• Evaluate the tasks against the needs of the organization and create a second
rating, with the most important tasks having the highest “benefit” number.
• Assign a third rating to assess time sensitivity. Those with the tightest
deadline would get the higher numbers.
• Add up the numbers to see which tasks have the highest total and therefore,
theoretically, the highest priority.
• The results aren’t absolute, of course. This is a loose exercise to get
coworkers thinking together about where to best focus their efforts.
Example:

Tasks today Speed Benefit Urgency Total
Clean breakroom. 3 1 1 5
Finalize and submit status report. 4 7 6 17
Respond to customer voicemails. 6 6 7 19
Print and collate mailers. 2 5 4 11
Resolve “load letter” issue on computer. 1 4 2 7
Reply to internal emails. 5 3 5 13
Talk about awesome idea. 7 2 3 12
There’s great value in the creative bond that Logicians likely have with other Analysts
at work, but in the eyes of most employers, value is directly proportional to how well
work gets done. For these types, balancing ideas with priority action is paramount to
succeeding on the job.
Cooperating with Productive Awareness
The potential for exciting cooperation is very strong with Logicians and other
Analysts, but they should beware of a tendency to pit people against each other in
the work environment. Self-awareness is essential, especially when it comes to
competitive or critical urges, which can trigger combative behavior. It’s important for
all Analyst types to remember that they have jobs to do, so whatever ideas advance
their professional performance are good things – and anyone who contributes such
ideas is an asset.

Diverse views are helpful to productivity, and when these types practice patience and
grace when proving – or disproving – either their conclusions and ideas or those of
others, they’ll be perceived as assets. Disagreement can spur innovation, and most
Logicians and other Analysts enjoy intellectual sparring, so it needn’t be harsh or
insulting to be stimulating. Some personality types may be too sensitive or inflexible
to enjoy these types of dialogue, but Logician–Analyst coworkers often find their best
ideas through respectful debate and pointed experimentation. When people see the
amazing results of such cooperative effort, these two types can be proud of what
they came up with together. The following exercise can help spur cooperative effort.
• Instead of competing together against each other, decide to explore views and
ideas together.
• Ask others for as much detail as possible.
• Ask for a demonstration of how something works.
• Apply each other’s approach to test it. It may be a useful idea or perspective,
and combined effort may yield unexpected benefits.
• Discuss results together and challenge each other to be objective.
• Give it more than one chance. Try it under different circumstances.
• Look for ways to hybridize, adapt, and evolve the idea. It’s not a contest; it’s
about searching for improvement that benefits all.
It’s not always easy to sublimate ego in favor of progress, but doing so can garner
great respect in the workplace. When Logicians and other Analysts choose to
cooperate, they can accomplish some amazing results.

Logician–Diplomat Cooperation
Logicians and Diplomats both prefer discussing the “big picture” more than minor
details, and they dream of improving the world. They absorb new knowledge almost
subconsciously and then incorporate it into a larger constellation of understanding.
Both are imaginative and creative as they connect the dots, often in deep and
unexpected ways. These similarities give Logicians and Diplomats plenty of
commonalities that create opportunities to combine their talents at work.
An Important Reflection
Diplomats tend to live by their values and empathy, focusing on serving human need
and prioritizing emotional harmony. Logicians are usually more comfortable with
systems and problem-solving, and they tend to value innovation and efficient
function most. Logicians often find their thinking balanced by the lessons Diplomats
teach them about the human impact of ideas, decisions, and actions. Diplomats
provide a unique perspective on any systems that Logicians devise, which is
especially helpful when these systems concern customers or other employees.

These types offer each other valuable diversity of thinking, while speaking in mutually
relatable, imaginative terms. Any endeavor that prioritizes good feelings over other
factors can flounder in the hard world of business. Rational, objective analysis is
critical for an organization or project to succeed, and Logicians can contribute sharp
insight when Diplomats tend toward softer thinking. If they respect each other’s
feedback and share their contributions honestly, both types become far more
capable.
Warming Up the Workplace
In some ways, a balanced working relationship is like a friendship, with all parties
sharing support as well as their own views. Logicians are used to tackling problems
in their minds, so the social component of professional cooperation can seem
baffling. To them, compatibility is a matter of specific need and alignment – things
either fit or they don’t. However, Diplomats seek to go beyond the cog-like meshing
of necessity, with their ready warmth and active minds turned toward a productive
bond that they see as a worthwhile end unto itself.
For Logicians, this support has a core of real usefulness. Whether they have a specific
work issue to overcome or must deal with workday stress, the fact that Diplomat
coworkers truly care can be refreshing. Logicians also quickly learn that Diplomats
deeply appreciate their own cheerful contributions on a personal level, and such
positivity makes progress easier to achieve. Logicians appreciate efficiency, but
factual, effective thinking need not be sterile – a workday with Diplomats can be
efficient and fun.

Clashing Rationales
Logicians may dismiss Diplomats’ point of view as too soft or subjective, whereas
Diplomats may regard Logicians’ outlook as clinical or uncaring. The sharp
differences between analytical Logicians and empathetic Diplomats can create points
of contention at work – slowing progress, eclipsing cooperation, and possibly even
painting either or both in a negative light if they’re unable to function together. Work
almost always must lead to accomplishment, and anything that interferes with
results spells trouble.
The conflict between efficiency and empathy may be evident even when both
perspectives are well thought out and have significant merit. Their equally sincere
yet distinctly different forms of idealism can create a disconnect, no matter how
laudably they try to do what they think is right. If they become too entrenched in their
positions, they may feel that compromise is too high a price to pay for the sake of
cooperation – and therefore never gain the personal benefit of understanding things
from a different perspective.
Feeling Resentment
Logicians and Diplomats can end up debating their different approaches, but even
their reasoning and communication styles may be incompatible. Logicians can be
dismissive of feelings, especially when people don’t see things their way, wanting to
focus only on what they consider hard facts and logic. When their impatience
becomes unbalanced brusqueness, it’s all too easy for them to damage their working
relationships with Diplomats. Logicians may not feel much remorse, though, and
instead resent the need to cater to what they see as unhelpful emotional sensitivity.

Faced with such treatment, Diplomats can quickly become frustrated, disappointed,
or even personally hurt. They may disengage if Logicians come across as harsh or
condescending, even if it’s directed at a third party. Offended Diplomats might also
dig in their heels if they see Logicians’ attitude as truly unjust, tossing facts aside and
offering ongoing passionate resistance at every turn – something that Logicians are
ill-equipped to remedy. Resentment between the two types is a two-way street that
can lead them both into an unproductive mire.
The Bigger Picture
Every workplace has its own culture. When Logicians want to rebalance problems
with Diplomats that stem from differences in the way they both think, it can be useful
to look at the intent and environment of the job itself. Work is about progress toward
a goal. To put it bluntly, differences between efficiency and empathy aren’t as
important as achieving the goals set forth by employers. It’s a matter of professional
obligation that both types can respect.
If the way Diplomats operate in the workplace gives them great success, Logicians
may want to evaluate why – and consider what they can learn. What may seem like
a “soft” approach might be a tremendous asset in certain areas of business. On the
other hand, if they see that Diplomats’ views and methods aren’t working well, they
needn’t personally take on the task of trying to “fix” them – that’s what supervisors
are for. The art of polite disagreement is a great tool in any workplace, and feedback
doesn’t always mean arguing. “To each, their own,” may be a possible resolution. To
keep things professional, Logicians can try the following.

• Before questioning Diplomat colleagues, consider whether it’s out of line to
say anything critical – coworkers might not need to be told how they’re wrong.
• When differences surface, explore them by asking respectful questions. The
reasons behind the conclusions can be as important as the conclusions
themselves.
• Listen – not to build an argument, but to learn another way of thinking. Stay
open-minded and strive to understand the complete picture.
• If any flaws must be pointed out, give fact-based feedback rather than
opinions.
• Speak in concerned rather than critical tones: “I just worry that if we do that,
we’ll find [such and such consequence].”
• Offer helpful participation. Everyone appreciates a constructive solution;
tearing things down without building something better is merely destructive.
• Frame differences with a desire for the best possible outcome. It’s not
personal – it’s about finding the best option by working together.
At the end of the day, both types fare better when they realize that they don’t always
decide how to proceed. The job may simply require them to offer their best ideas
and views to peers and superiors and then enthusiastically support the
organization’s direction, even when they don’t wholeheartedly agree.
Striking a Friendly Tone
Cooperation on the job is almost always necessary to achieve success. Like spreading
landmines, offending coworkers can yield unexpectedly lasting and grisly results. To
improve relations with Diplomat coworkers, Logicians can approach them more
carefully. Taking time to understand the values that are important to Diplomats is
usually deeply appreciated. When they respect how Diplomats express their

empathic, perceptive nature, they can build a dynamic partnership, gaining allies with
different and useful talents.
Just as a car may need time to warm up on a cold morning, Logicians should
understand the importance of establishing a friendly connection before getting down
to business. Diplomats can be acutely sensitive to blunt dialogue, but when Logicians
show a little social grace and positivity, much more productive communication and
cooperation are likely. Logicians need not force warmth or platitudes, but they can
tap into their sense of curiosity to reach out to Diplomats with the following basic
conversation exercise.
• Greet them with a smile.
• Ask how their day is going.
• Give them a few moments to talk about themselves before replying.
• Pick some aspect of their response and reply with a compliment or empathy:
for example, “Wow, that’s cool!” or, “Ugh, that really sucks!” or, “I know that
must be rough for you.”
• Instead of using “me” or “I” statements, stay focused on what they’re saying.
• After displaying some interest in their day, deliberately close the conversation.
Make an excuse if necessary to get back to work.
• When you have a work matter to bring up, use a short version of this rather
than immediately launching into business.
Logicians aren’t deficient just because they don’t place as much emphasis on social
niceties in the workplace as others – their way has its merits. However, practicing
skills that let them relate better to Diplomats can create the kind of efficient
communication that these logical types crave. Like a spoonful of sugar to help the

medicine go down, a ration of niceties can get Logicians and Diplomats on common
and effective ground with ideas flowing between them.
Logician–Sentinel Cooperation
Sentinels and Logicians have some basic differences in their intent and methods.
Logicians love to experiment with the potential of a system, whereas Sentinels attend
to business in the here and now, performing practical tasks and building order.
Logicians and Sentinels may gravitate toward different but complementary
functions, but when their approaches are combined cheerfully and respectfully, they
can move mountains.
Implementing Solutions Together
In some ways, this is a grand workplace match, as Logicians often need someone to
help them carry out their vision, and Sentinels tend to act efficiently. Logicians are
masters of thought, but not always follow-through, so partnering with Sentinels who
help develop their ideas for application in the practical realm can bring great success.

As soon as they voice an idea, Sentinels are likely to cautiously start examining its
applications – and costs – in the real world, nicely balancing Logicians’ active
imaginations.
Translating grand ideas into practical reality can also be reversed to helpful ends, as
conventional, everyday problems can be overcome with grand ideas. When Sentinels
run up against roadblocks, Logicians may be able to offer unconventional thinking to
get things back on track, using innovation to evolve outdated practices. If both types
can accept the other’s unique role in productivity and draw on their respective
strengths, each can become invaluable to the other.
Future Planning
Another area of balance the two offer each other on the job is future thinking and
planning. Logicians exist in a realm of possibility, always thinking about what they
might craft the future to look like. Sentinels try to control the present, creating
stability in the face of the unknown by planning for the future, if not inhabiting it
mentally.
When Logicians share their forward-looking views, Sentinels see more possibilities
than they might on their own. Logicians, meanwhile, can benefit significantly from
Sentinels’ sensible plans. These types often bounce from idea to idea, their attention
scattered by their enthusiasm and curiosity. When Sentinels offer Logicians a clear
path to follow, it helps them focus their efforts and achieve progress.
Balanced cooperation enables Logicians to add clever shortcuts, and spot hidden
icebergs, while Sentinels plot a sensible course. When their imaginative vision shapes
Sentinels’ orderly plans, the workplace benefits from the best of both worlds:
adaption and consistency.

The Possibility Gap
Unfortunately, the profound differences between these two personality types can
cause conflict if they don’t consciously recognize each other’s virtues and accept the
value of cooperation. One of their most likely breakdowns revolves around Logicians’
active imagination and love of theorizing. Their constant curiosity over “what ifs” can
start to seem like wasted time to Sentinels, especially when such ideas overreach
probability (as they occasionally might) or aren’t balanced by some commitment.
Logicians are dreamers at heart, and if Sentinels too often shoot down their ideas as
unnecessary – or level the perceived insult of “impossible” at their inspired thinking
– it can be frustrating. They may begin to resent Sentinels as stubborn detractors
acting against them. When Logicians resent Sentinels’ staid thinking, and Sentinels
dismiss Logicians as lost in the clouds, both abandon the very real possibilities they
could otherwise create together.
Disrupting Tradition
Logicians tend to be open to change, seeking out new ideas and areas for
improvement with the belief that innovation is the ultimate solution. On some level,
they crave newness, as it represents at least a potential for growth and progress.
Sentinels, on the other hand, tend to adhere to proven standards and traditions, and
they can find Logicians’ experimental changes threatening. They may respond by
fighting against what feels like chaos, resulting in a conflicted workplace.
Logicians like functional reliability, but if they feel that the status quo gets in the way
of improving a system, they’ll likely argue for change. However, they may push too

hard against what they see as illogical worship of structure and consistency. Sentinels
may insist that the “right” way is how it’s always been done, citing reliability as more
important than an intangible possibility. This argument is already present in many
companies, but when these two types take it too far or make it personal, productivity
can grind to a halt.
The Proof is in the Pudding
Logicians may never get Sentinels to match their imaginative thinking, but that isn’t
the only way to rebalance. These types must understand that Sentinels aren’t as
impressed by theory as they are by demonstration; they want something to “take to
the bank” – their faith is earned by proof. Logicians who prove their ideas through
action gain credibility, making future support more likely.
Sentinels appreciate predictability, so when Logicians build a track record of
successful ideas, they also earn the right to ask now and then for a reasonable leap
of faith. Sentinels are generally risk-averse, but past events factor heavily into their
judgment, so respected Logicians can draw them beyond their boundaries by
reassuringly pointing to supporting factors along the way. When sharing ideas with
Sentinels, this simple presentation exercise can help.
• Describe the goal: the value of making the change, and what success looks like.
• Highlight the specific benefits, as well as possible risks and how pitfalls can be
mitigated.
• Outline the steps clearly. What will it take in real terms of human effort,
training, funding, and time?

• Cite similar ideas that were successful in the past. (Don’t brag. Just focus on
positive, concrete outcomes, like sales numbers or increased efficiency, as well
as how risks were addressed or proven unfounded.)
• Maintain the congenial, respectful tone of responsible peers planning
together.
• Take ownership of the idea by offering to take the lead in implementing it.
Logicians may not enjoy feeling like they must defend their imagination, but visionary
thinkers often need to do just that. Professional success is far more likely to come
when they gain the support of Sentinels with a more conventional outlook.
One Step at a Time
Change is undeniably critical for any business to improve. But changes, especially
when based on theories, simply make many Sentinels uncomfortable. Factual
evidence is important to address these coworkers’ concerns, but Logicians can also
assuage their hesitation by not pushing for everything at once. Sentinels are far more
likely to accept incremental improvements than sudden major changes. In the
interest of progress, Logicians can choose to adapt to this.
Allowing plenty of time for change to take place – and time to verify and appreciate
the benefits of each stage – can also build support from Sentinels. Impatience from
overeager Logicians may bring out stubborn resistance from even the most
supportive Sentinels if they feel that too many things are changing too quickly. To
remedy this, Logicians can suggest smaller, specific changes, sequentially reshaping
things in stages even when the overall combined effect is significant. Here are some
steps Logicians can take toward this end.

• Break larger changes down into smaller parts, with verifiable short-term
targets. (For instance, instead of redesigning an entire retail department, alter
just a few displays at a time.)
• Initiate each change for the sake of its own merits, and track results. (In our
example, whether those display changes boosted sales – or not.)
• Be willing to admit when something doesn’t work. Evaluation should include a
plan to undo and learn from flops. After all, knowing what didn’t work and why
often leads to a better idea.
• Roll successes forward into additional related suggestions to subtly create
ongoing progress.
• Incorporate Sentinels’ feedback at each stage. They may very well uncover
practical issues as they try to implement change, and Logicians can use such
information to improve a process or project.
• Emphasize the teamwork involved, as well as the value of making productive
changes together. (“Look what we accomplished!”)
In business, sensible change leads to better outcomes. Logicians can work toward
change while giving Sentinels due respect for contributing the “sensible” parts. When
change is paced and balanced between innovation and proven standards, reliability
can be maintained without sacrificing progress.

Logician–Explorer Cooperation
Both Logicians and Explorers enjoy searching for answers, but their methods of
doing so can be radically different. Logicians enjoy theorizing about ideas and
solutions, whereas Explorers would rather get things done through hands-on
engagement. What the two types have in common, however, is an adaptable outlook,
which allows them to work very well together in any job.
Balancing Vision with Action, and Action with Vision
Logicians and Explorers can create excellent working relationships when they tap
into each other’s strengths. They often collaborate well in a two-stage process:
Logicians generate new ideas, and Explorers boost the impetus to get to work on
them. Logicians don’t always jump into action, but this can be balanced by Explorers’
tendency toward spontaneous motivation. The two types may quickly fall in sync:
Logicians’ imagination is excited by Explorers’ readiness to engage.

The question, “What if?” can be a powerful bond on the job. When an idea appeals to
both these types, the chance to discover what might be is an irresistible lure that
encourages them to make things happen. Logicians revel in thought experiments,
but they often find the earthy, “Give it a go!” attitude of Explorer coworkers a very
refreshing step into reality – it calls for functional experimentation, yet little
restriction. Intellectual energy fuels tangible output when these two types take on
projects in a balanced way together.
Discovery Unleashed
Their shared Prospecting trait means that Logicians and Explorers are unlikely to be
bound by – or even give much thought to – convention. Whether experimenting with
a new budget strategy or introducing a new series of entrées on a restaurant menu,
these mentally mobile types leave no stone unturned in their pursuit of success.
Logicians see potential everywhere, and Explorers gladly try out interesting things,
making this team adept at opening new and sometimes unexpected possibilities.
Their willingness to innovate and engage new practices can be profoundly beneficial,
especially when Logicians and Explorers are part of a larger team with other qualities
blended in. Their genuine sense of curiosity can not only create options for the
future, but also inspire contagious energy in their professional environment. The new
ideas and methods that Logicians and Explorers brew together can be a refreshing
tonic for any business, breathing new life into any stale practices that may have taken
hold.

Impractical Meets Impulsive
Although Logicians and Explorers can work together very well, the combination also
has potential downsides. To Explorers, whose focus is typically on the present,
Logicians inhabit a world of lofty, complex, futuristic notions. Logicians may come to
dismiss Explorers as uninspired, narrow-minded, or reckless, even viewing them as
vacuous for failing to worship philosophical and intellectual thought. If such disdain
is voiced as criticism, communication between the two types can quickly shut down.
If Logicians’ grand way of thinking is too vague and impractical for too long, Explorers
may see their ideas as unrealistic, unintelligible, and disengaged from the necessities
of the job – or even from life itself. Explorers aren’t known for impulse control, and
when their frustration verges on the unbalanced, they can suddenly lose patience,
either dismissing Logicians and withdrawing their support or just criticizing them
outright. When their frustration with each other grows, either may throw cooperation
to the wind – Logicians retreating into smug arrogance and Explorers brashly moving
forward however they see fit.
A Pair of Wandering Types
Logicians are prone to mental meandering, and Explorers are likely to get sidetracked
in experiences of the moment – because both types tend to wander, when they work
together, getting off target is a real possibility. Without some oversight, they may do
each other a disservice when their shared curiosity gets out of balance, such as when
they get easily distracted by things that are exciting but not necessarily productive.
In most job roles, such errant behavior can cause their collective performance to
suffer, potentially getting them into trouble.

What makes this a cause for concern is that they aren’t likely to have the skills to pull
themselves back on track. Although their intellects are far from childish, they may
unconsciously lead each other into immature irresponsibility: Logicians’ unbridled
creativity can become enthusiastic, experimental floundering; Explorers may fall
victim to short-sighted, spontaneous decision making. Without something to inspire
a sense of judicious dedication, they may find themselves starting much and finishing
little.
Respecting Different Types of Genius
Genius comes in many forms, so Logicians should appreciate Explorers’ preference
for hands-on execution. Although a focus on practical matters in the moment may
seem slightly limiting, success can hinge on such attention to the finer points.
Logicians must understand that Explorers are likely to work in ways that seem
foreign, but they’re great at quick thinking, troubleshooting, and adaptation, nicely
balancing Logicians’ tendency to get lost in future visions.
To gain a personally beneficial understanding of Explorers’ hands-on approach,
Logicians can put their own hands into the mix, participating in Explorers’ projects –
and in their very methods and way of thinking. Offering assistance to other people
learning unfamiliar styles and techniques (without preconceptions) can be a valuable
exercise. Such learning can enable balanced cooperation, as well as expand
Logicians’ knowledge with revelatory new insight. Logicians can do so without much
planning by following a few guidelines.
• Watch for opportunities to step in and offer help.
• Observe Explorers’ workflow and methods.

• Ask for demonstrations – the chance to teach a willing student can enthuse
anyone.
• Try out their suggestions and practices, under their direction.
• Respect what works, even if it’s a different way of doing things.
Both Logicians and Explorers are focused on efficiency, just in different ways – one
wrangling reality within their mind and the other exploring the tangible. Both benefit
from the other’s perspective when addressing any problematic situation.
Understanding the valuable qualities that each brings to the table is best done
through cooperation.
Guiding Each Other in the Right Direction
To get enthusiastic distraction under control, Logicians and Explorers can help each
other attend to tasks at hand, rather than put so many irons in the fire that
completion is difficult. Multitasking can be a huge asset, but types vulnerable to
losing focus may need to deliberately concentrate within a specific structure. Of
course, innovating such a system isn’t exactly second nature to these two personality
types, so they might have to ask for oversight or involvement from a third party.
By following a plan together, Logicians and Explorers may also be able to prevent any
supervisory crackdown – after all, taking personal steps toward mutual discipline can
help them preserve their beloved freedom and autonomy. They can help each other
meet their goals by offering support throughout, then cheering when something is
finished. Tailoring a system to suit a job is up to the parties involved, but here is a
general framework they can use.

• Sequential conditionality: The start of something new is dependent on the
completion of a previous commitment. Don’t have too many balls in the air at
once, and you’re less likely to fail.
• Supportive oversight: Curtail habitual distraction by not leaving each other to
your own devices. Cheerfully – and briefly – help each other stay focused. This
can make even personal tasks feel like a team effort.
• Accountability: Some level of external oversight is necessary to be accountable
for progress. Commit to completion times and goals and report them to a third
party.
• Mutual assistance: Cement a positive working relationship by backing each
other up when either strays off course. However, don’t allow this to become
one-sided; both types must contribute equally and always remain willing to
help when needed.
Whatever plan these two personality types come up with to boost each other’s
dedication and focus, it’s best when it’s specific and simple, and therefore easier to
follow through.
Conclusion
Logicians may face certain challenges when trying to build a successful career that’s
personally rewarding – their perceptions include such a wide arc that it can be
difficult for them to direct their energy down a single path for a long period of time.
But therein lies one of their greatest strengths, as they aren’t likely to find themselves
backed into a corner. Logicians can almost always see a better choice. It may not be
easy, but changing career directions is an option, if such a change can meet their own
needs and standards.

Indeed, these types may find themselves expanding beyond any one job role, given
sufficient time and effort, as there’s little they can’t master. A greater challenge may
be figuring out how to find ongoing satisfaction in their professional responsibilities
after they’ve become familiar. Perhaps it’s enough to earn material rewards that
enable other, more inspiring pursuits, or perhaps they’ll be lucky and work at
something that frequently provides them exciting challenges.
In any case, Logicians can pride themselves on wanting to understand and explore
new things – such a craving for knowledge and experience is both worthy and
laudable. Balancing intellectual thirst with an ability to follow inspiration through to
successful conclusion is critical for these types. Mature Logicians aren’t only
fountains of ideas and inspired inquiry, but also highly capable people – a
combination that any wise employer can recognize as deeply valuable.

Final Words
Final Words
An Ongoing Quest
One of the few bottlenecks that Logicians impose upon themselves is a fear of being
locked down by either success or failure. Unlike the certitude possessed by their
Architect cousins, Logicians can spend ages reflecting on and refining their actions,
choices, and circumstances – a nearly endless argument within their own minds.
Their restless search for answers can lead to not only happiness, but also practical
progress. Logicians have the tools to pursue whatever they want, and a lifetime spent
chasing knowledge, ideas, and lofty goals is nothing to be ashamed of.
Moreover, when Logicians balance theory and action, their dreams are well within
their reach. Understanding the mechanics of anything can lead to great things – from
establishing a happy romantic relationship to mastering a personal interest to
achieving professional success. Logicians can find the energy to commit to a course
of action through their imagination; when a goal is truly important to them, their
underlying passion prompts them to take matters into their own hands.

Final Words
Interactive Growth
The joy of connecting with others is important, but it may come slowly to Logicians.
Although they don’t need a big social circle, they nonetheless enjoy a select few who
treasure their thoughts and properly value their company. When they share
themselves with others, the reward is often worth the risk, even if compatibility isn’t
common. In fact, such an uncommon type may be wise to be picky about who they
open their hearts and minds to, while never giving up the hope of finding deeper
connections.
Any weakness can be turned into an asset, if they pursue balance honestly. Logicians
need not worry about altering their identity – there are practical, beneficial ways to
apply their existing abilities. As discussed in the preceding chapters, they possess
excellent resources for personal growth: flexibility, contemplative reserve, rational
intellectuality, and so many other qualities. When Logicians take a realistic look at
their existence and ask themselves what they would like to change, they can step
away from the role of observer and become an active participant in their own
evolution. Although Logicians may never stop questioning the world around them,
they often find their greatest joy when they become part of the answer.
The Road Ahead
We’ve covered many different topics in this profile, and we hope that the chapters
have offered insight and answered questions about the Logician personality type. We
hope that readers will now find it easier to understand other people and their
perspectives. This profile isn’t meant to be read just once. When trying to understand
another person better, or struggling to understand oneself, another read-through
can offer fresh insight.

Final Words
Furthermore, spend some time on our website – for example, in our articles section,
research zone, or the Academy. There is a wealth of inspiring advice and information
on the website, and we strongly recommend that you take a look. If you have some
spare time, consider lending us a helping hand by contributing to the translation
project, taking additional surveys, or simply sending us a message and sharing your
thoughts about this profile or the website in general. We would love to hear from
you.
We wish the best of luck to all Logicians. What matters most in Logicians’ lives is that
their paths through life reflect who they are, deep within. Our lives are often too full
of troubles, conflicts, and worries. By working to better understand each other, we
can make our relationships, communities, and world more aware, more genuine, and
more peaceful.

The Puzzle of Personality
Appendix
When they receive their personality test results on our website, most people’s first
question is, “What do these letters mean?” We are of course referring to those
mysterious acronyms – INTJ-A, for example, or ENFP-T. As you may have already
learned from the type descriptions or articles on the website, the five letters of these
acronyms each refer to a specific trait, with certain trait combinations forming
various types and type groups. But before we discuss those traits in depth, let’s
explore their historical foundations.
Since the dawn of time, humans have drawn up schematics to describe and
categorize our personalities. From the four temperaments of the ancient civilizations
to the latest advances in psychology, we have been driven to fit the variables and
complexities of human personality into well-defined models. Although we are still
some time away from being able to do that, the current models account for our most
important personality traits and can predict our behavior with a high degree of
accuracy.

Personality is just one of many factors that guide our behavior, however. Our actions
are also influenced by our environment, our experiences, and our individual goals.
This profile describes how people belonging to a specific personality type are likely to
behave. We will outline indicators and tendencies, however, not definitive guidelines
or answers. Significant differences can exist even among people who share a
personality type. The information in this profile is meant to inspire personal growth
and an improved understanding of yourself and your relationships – not to be taken
as gospel.
Our approach has its roots in two different philosophies. One dates back to the early
20th century and was the brainchild of Carl Gustav Jung, the father of analytical
psychology. Jung’s theory of psychological types is perhaps the most influential
creation in personality typology, and it has inspired many different theories. One of
Jung’s key contributions was the development of the concept of Introversion and
Extraversion – he theorized that each of us falls into one of these two categories,
either focusing on the internal world (Introvert) or the outside world (Extravert).
Besides Introversion and Extraversion, Jung coined the concept of so-called cognitive
functions, separated into Judging or Perceiving categories. According to Jung, each
person prefers one of these cognitive functions and may most naturally rely on it in
everyday situations.
In the 1920s, Jung’s theory was noticed by Katharine Cook Briggs, who later co-
authored one of the most popular personality indicators used today, the Myers-
Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®). Briggs was a teacher with an avid interest in
personality typing, having developed her own type theory before learning of Jung’s
writings. Together with her daughter, Isabel Briggs Myers, they developed a

convenient way to describe the order of each person’s Jungian preferences – this is
how four-letter acronyms were born.
Of course, this is just a very simplified description of the Myers-Briggs theory.
Readers interested in learning more should read Gifts Differing: Understanding
Personality Type by Isabel Briggs Myers. As we define personality traits and types
differently in our model, we will not go deeper into Jungian concepts or related
theories in this profile.
Due to its simplicity and ease of use, the four-letter naming model is now shared by
a number of diverse theories and approaches, including Socionics, Keirsey
Temperament Sorter®, and Linda Berens’ Interaction Styles, among many others.
While the acronyms used by these theories may be identical or very similar, however,
their meanings do not always overlap. As a result, if you meet five people who say, “I
am an INFJ,” their understanding of what that means may vary significantly.
Regardless of its structure, any type-based theory will struggle to describe or
characterize people whose scores lie near the dividing line. A different way to look at
personalities is through the lens of a trait-based rather than a type-based model.
What do we mean by that? Instead of creating an arbitrary number of categories and
attempting to fit people within them, a trait-based model simply studies the degree
to which people exhibit certain traits.
You may have heard the term Ambivert, which is a perfect example in this case.
Ambiversion means that someone falls in the middle of the Introversion-Extraversion
scale, being neither too outgoing nor too withdrawn. Trait-based theories would
simply say that an Ambivert is moderately Extraverted or moderately Introverted and
leave it at that, without assigning a personality type.

A trait-based approach makes it easier to reliably measure correlations between
personality traits and other characteristics – for example, political attitudes. This is
why trait-based approaches dominate psychometric research, but that’s more or less
the only area where these approaches are dominant. Because they don’t offer types
or categorizations, trait-based theories don’t translate as well as type-based theories
into specific recommendations and takeaways. Assigned categories such as Extravert
or Introvert may be limiting, but they allow us to conceptualize human personality
and create theories about why we do what we do – something that a more
scientifically reliable but colorless statement, such as you are 37% Extraverted,
simply cannot do.
With our model, we’ve combined the best of both worlds. We use the acronym format
introduced by Myers-Briggs for its simplicity and convenience, with an extra letter to
accommodate five rather than four scales. However, unlike Myers-Briggs or other
theories based on the Jungian model, we have not incorporated Jungian concepts
such as cognitive functions, or their prioritization. Jungian concepts are very difficult
to measure and evaluate scientifically, so we’ve instead chosen to rework and
rebalance the dimensions of personality called the Big Five personality traits, a model
that is very popular in psychological and social research.
Our personality types are based on five independent spectrums, with all letters in
the type code (e.g. INFJ-A) referring to one of the two sides of the corresponding
spectrum. We’ll talk more about these concepts in the next chapter. This approach
has allowed us to achieve high test accuracy while also retaining the ability to define
and describe distinct personality types.
During the last few years, we have conducted more than 800 studies to uncover
trends and correlations between personality traits and various behaviors. Many of

these studies will be referenced in this profile, and additional information can be
found in our online Academy. Our goal is to give you access to our sources without
repeating ourselves or overwhelming you with information. If you are particularly
interested in a specific study or its statistical characteristics, please feel free to
contact us via our website, and we will do our best to provide additional information.
With that aside, let’s dig deeper into the five personality aspects!
Five Personality Aspects
Mind: Introverted (I) vs. Extraverted (E)
The distinction between Introverts and Extraverts may be the oldest notion in the
history of personality theories. It has long been observed that some people are
expressive and outgoing, while others are reserved, quiet, and more comfortable
alone. The first group recharges by engaging with the external world and
communicating with other people, whereas members of the second group are
energized by spending time alone and connecting with their own inner world.
We focus on these differences in our first scale, which we call Mind. This scale – which
is based on a person’s level of expressiveness and the degree to which he or she
seeks external stimulation – determines how we see and approach the outside world,
including people, objects, and activities. This scale correlates with a number of other
personality traits, such as willingness to volunteer, desire to engage in thrill-seeking
activities, and romantic assertiveness, to name just a few.

On one side of this scale, we have
Introverted individuals (the I letter in
the type acronym). You might
associate Introversion with being
private or withdrawn – or even
clumsy or antisocial – but our studies
show a far more complex picture.
Generally speaking, Introverts do
not seek or require much external stimulation. As you might expect, an Introvert
requires less communication with others than an Extravert would, but an Introvert’s
preference for less stimulation can also influence his or her hobbies, political
attitudes, and even eating or drinking habits. To give a practical example, our studies
have found that Introverts are less likely than Extraverts to enjoy coffee and energy
drinks.
But what about Extraverts?
Compared with Introverts,
Extraverts are more interested in
engaging with the people, objects,
and environment around them. This
preference manifests itself in many
ways: Extraverts are less sensitive
than Introverts to noise, for example,
and they are likelier to wear bright and colorful clothes. Extraverts not only tolerate
external stimuli, however; they actually need these stimuli in order to support their
own energy.

Extraverts are often energetic and willing to take the lead, especially in social
situations. They enjoy pushing themselves to the limit and challenging themselves
and those around them. Unlike Introverts, who are more cautious in their approach,
Extraverts are likely to feel that they can handle life’s challenges without much
forethought. Whether that turns out to be true depends on many other
circumstances, but overall, Extraverts tend to be more proactive in experiencing –
and embracing – the world around them.
Worldwide, the three most Extraverted countries are Oman (61.66%), Yemen
(59.44%), and Saudi Arabia (58.95%). The most Introverted countries are Japan
(59.88%), Lithuania (55.85%), and Portugal (54.25%). In the United States, New York
(50.92%), Mississippi (50.87%), and Illinois (50.64%) top the list for Extraverts, while
West Virginia (53.62%), Alaska (53.6%), and Maine (53.41%) report the highest
percentages of Introverts. Interestingly, if the District of Columbia were included in
the comparisons, it would easily top the Extraverted list. In our study, the average
Extraversion score for the capital city’s 23,310 respondents was 53.06% – significantly
above New York, its closest competitor.
Logicians are Introverted. This is why they enjoy being self-sufficient, prefer working
with ideas rather than people, and don’t need great numbers of friends. They may
even be able to tune out what is happening around them. Socializing depletes
Logicians’ internal energy reserves quite quickly, and when that happens, they need
to return to their home base to recharge.
Again, these are just tendencies and not predestined, unchangeable traits. For
instance, Logicians are perfectly capable of honing their social skills and becoming
experts in negotiation or small talk. Logicians would develop these skills out of
necessity, however, and not due to particular enthusiasm or interest.

Energy: Intuitive (N) vs. Observant (S)
Energy is the second scale in our model, and in our opinion it is the most important.
While the other four scales determine how you interact with the world (Mind), make
decisions (Nature), schedule your activities (Tactics), or react to external feedback
(Identity), the Energy scale actually determines how you see the world and what kind
of information you focus on.
All personality types can be divided into those that favor the Intuitive energy style
and those that favor the Observant energy style. Intuitive individuals tend to be
visionary, interested in ideas and abstractions, and attracted to novelty. Observant
individuals, on the other hand, prefer facts, concrete and observable things, and the
tried and true.
It is important to stress that this scale has nothing to do with how we absorb
information: Intuitive and Observant types use their five senses equally well. Instead,
this scale shows whether we focus on what is possible (making connections intuitively)
or what is real (observing the environment). If you are familiar with the Big Five
personality traits, you might recognize this scale as a reworking of the openness to
experience concept, with a focus on preference for (and tolerance of) novelty and
ambiguity.
Individuals with the Intuitive trait rely on their imaginations and think in terms of
ideas and possibilities. They dream, fantasize, and question why things happen the
way they do, always feeling slightly detached from the actual, concrete world.
Although they observe other people and events, their minds remain directed both
inwards and somewhere beyond – always questioning, wondering, and making

connections. When all is said and
done, Intuitive types believe in
novelty, in the open mind, and in
never-ending improvement.
In one 16Personalities study, we
asked people whether they wish
they had been born in the Age of
Discovery (roughly speaking, the 15th
through the 18th centuries). Our results showed that Intuitive types were much more
willing to give up the convenience, comfort, and predictability of modern life in
exchange for the excitement of exploration, distant civilizations, and the
undiscovered mysteries of the New World.
In contrast, individuals with the
Observant trait focus on the actual
world and things happening around
them. Preferring to see, touch, feel,
and experience, they are happy to
leave theories and possibilities to
others. They keep their feet on the
ground and focus on the present,
instead of wondering why or when something might happen. Consequently, people
with this trait tend to be better at dealing with facts, tools, and concrete objects as
opposed to brainstorming, theorizing about future events, or handling abstract
theories. Observant types are also significantly better at focusing on just one thing
at a time instead of juggling multiple activities.

The Energy scale influences communication style as well. Intuitive individuals talk
about ideas and have no difficulties with allusions or reading between the lines, while
Observant types focus on facts and practical matters. This is why Intuitive types may
find it challenging to understand someone with the Observant trait, and vice versa.
Intuitive types may think that Observant individuals are materialistic, unimaginative,
and simplistic, and Observant types may see their Intuitive conversation partner as
impractical, naïve, and absent-minded. These assumptions and biases can be quite
damaging, and it takes a mature person to get past them.
Geographically, the Middle East and Asia have the largest percentage of Observant
individuals, with 8 countries in the top 10 list. Saudi Arabia (71.94%), Oman (71.03%),
and Yemen (69.76%) have the top scores among Observant countries, while Nepal
(48.92%), Albania (48.51%) and Maldives (48.44%) top the Intuitive table.
In the United States, North Dakota (59.43%), Minnesota (59.23%), and Iowa (59.04%)
are the most Observant states. On the opposite side of the table, we have Nevada
(43.92%), Rhode Island (43.75%), and West Virginia (43.47%).
Logicians are Intuitive individuals. This is why they are so good at seeing possibilities
and honoring different points of view. People with this personality type spend more
time engaging in various internal discussions than observing things around them.
Logicians are not that concerned about what is happening; instead, they focus on
what might happen or why something has happened. Logicians hone this focus
throughout their lives, which makes them passionate and insightful thinkers.
Of course, every stick has two ends, and focus on novelty and change comes at a cost.
By directing their mental resources toward possibilities and the future, Logicians
inevitably lose sight of what is happening around them. They may have difficulties

dealing with practical matters or data. If they aren’t paying attention, they may even
miss something right under their nose. Because the majority of the population has
the Observant trait, Logicians may have difficulty finding a partner and connecting
with others.
Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)
The third scale, which we call Nature, determines how we make decisions and cope
with emotions. While we all have feelings, there are significant differences in how
different types react to them. This scale influences a number of areas of our lives,
particularly our interactions with other people.
People with the Thinking trait seek
logic and rational arguments, relying
on their head rather than their heart.
They do their best to safeguard,
manage, and conceal their emotions.
“Whatever happens, you must
always keep a cool head” – this is the
motto of Thinking individuals. These
types are not cold-blooded or indifferent, however. People with the Thinking trait are
often just as emotional as those with the Feeling trait, but they subdue or override
their feelings with their rational logic.
In several of our studies, we analyzed the attitudes of different personality types
toward philanthropy and charitable causes. Thinking types are significantly less likely
to engage in charitable giving or to be touched by charities’ emotional appeals. Does
this mean that they are unwilling to help? Not necessarily. It turns out that Thinking

personalities don’t believe that giving money to charity is the best way to make a
difference. They may look for other ways to be of assistance – for example, investing
in education for the disadvantaged.
In contrast, people with the Feeling trait follow their hearts and care little about
hiding their emotions. From their perspective, we should not be afraid to listen to
our innermost feelings and share them with the world. These individuals tend to be
compassionate, sensitive, and highly emotional. They would rather cooperate than
compete, although they are not naïve or easily swayed.
In fact, people with the Feeling trait
are likely to fight tooth and nail for
their values and beliefs. For many
Feeling types, principles and ideals
are much more important than, say,
professional success. Although this
perspective might not seem rational,
Feeling types generally adhere to
their own highly individualized – and perfectly valid – logic.
Worldwide, Iran (51.91%), Georgia (50.74%), and Albania (48.94%) report highest
scores on the Thinking side of the scale. On the Feeling side, we have Singapore
(61.41%), Australia (60.1%), and New Zealand (59.98%).
In the U.S., northern states tend to be slightly more Feeling, but not significantly so.
One interesting example is the contrast between Utah and Nevada: two neighboring
states that are each first on opposite sides of the scale. In Utah, the average score is
61.19% on the Feeling side, well above Minnesota (59.61%) and Idaho (59.54%), which

take second and third place, respectively. Nevada, on the other hand, is the most
Thinker-heavy state in our study, with its 34,576 respondents getting an average
score of 42.99% on the Thinking side of the spectrum. While that still means Feeling
personality types outnumber Thinking types significantly, we rarely see such
differences between neighboring regions. Other top Thinking states include
Delaware (42.71%) and New Mexico (42.7%).
Logicians have the Thinking trait. These types trust and prioritize logic, and they rely
on rational arguments over emotional appeals. They try to keep their true feelings
and emotions deep below the surface, and focus instead on what can be assessed,
compared, and verified.
Individuals with the Thinking trait, like Logicians, bring tremendous value to
enterprises that need careful assessment and calculation to succeed. Unfortunately,
for all the good it represents, the Thinking trait may distance Logicians from much of
the population, as connecting at an emotional level takes more effort for these
intellectual types.
Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting (P)
The Tactics scale determines how we approach planning and how we handle
available options. The implications reach well beyond our calendars, however. At its
core, this scale determines our attitudes toward certainty and structure in our lives.
People with the Judging trait do not like to keep their options open. They would rather
prepare five different contingency plans than wait for challenges to arise. These
individuals enjoy clarity and closure, always sticking to the plan rather than going
with the flow. It’s as if Judging types keep a mental checklist, and once a decision is

crossed off that list, it is not open to reassessment. This mentality applies as much
to grocery shopping as it does to life goals, like buying a house.
Individuals with the Judging trait
tend to have a strong work ethic,
putting their duties and
responsibilities above all else. Our
research indicates that Judging types
are also strict when it comes to law
and order. Of course, this doesn’t
mean that Prospecting individuals
are lawbreakers, but if you see someone go out of his or her way to use a crosswalk,
that person is likely a Judging type.
In contrast, Prospecting individuals are flexible and relaxed when it comes to dealing
with both expected and unexpected challenges. They are always scanning for
opportunities and options, willing to jump at a moment’s notice. People with this trait
understand that life is full of possibilities, and they are reluctant to commit to
something that might prove an inferior option in the future. They also focus more on
what makes them happy than what their parents, employers, or teachers expect. If a
specific task is not particularly
important or interesting, a
Prospecting individual will always
come up with something better to
do.
Looking at the geographical data,
the global Judging-Prospecting chart

has interesting similarities with the Extraverted-Introverted one. While these scales
do not influence each other from a statistical perspective, many of the countries
topping the Extraverted-Introverted charts have correspondingly high Judging-
Prospecting scores. At the top of the Judging table we have Oman (58.05%), Yemen
(57.78%), and Kuwait (55.8%), while the most Prospecting countries are Japan
(55.21%), Nepal (53.74%), and Lithuania (53.62%).
The map of the United States, however, does not show significant overlaps between
these two scales. On the Judging side of the spectrum, we have South Carolina
(51.05%), Alabama (50.97%), and Tennessee (50.8%). On the other side, the most
Prospecting states are Alaska (51.2%), Vermont (50.86%), and West Virginia (50.76%).
Logicians are Prospecting individuals, and look for different ways to complete tasks
or accomplish goals. Logicians’ vast range of interests may lead to unfinished projects
or missed deadlines, but these types would rather risk disappointing others than lock
themselves into a position where existing commitments would limit their freedom.
Logicians tend to be removed from the real world, often paying far more attention
to their latest mental exercise than to clutter around the house or dishes piled in the
sink. Prospecting types are relaxed about their work or studies, refusing to get
stressed about deadlines, templates, or rules when they still have free time.

Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T)
The last scale, Identity, affects all others, reflecting how confident we are in our
abilities and decisions. In a way, this scale acts as an internal sensor, reacting to the
input we get from our environments – for instance, success or failure, feedback from
others, or pressure caused by unexpected events. The Mind and Identity scales are
the alpha and the omega of our model, acting as an external shell that we wear in all
of our interactions with the outside world. Later, we will discuss the four possible
combinations of these traits, which we call “Strategies,” but in the meantime, let’s
take an in-depth look at the Identity
scale.
Assertive individuals are self-
assured, even-tempered, and
resistant to stress. They refuse to
worry too much, and they don’t push
themselves too hard when it comes
to achieving goals. Similarly, they are
unlikely to spend much time
thinking about past actions or choices. According to Assertive types, what’s done is
done and there is little point in analyzing it. Not surprisingly, people with this trait are
generally satisfied with their lives, and they feel confident in their ability to handle
challenging and unexpected situations.

In contrast, Turbulent individuals
are self-conscious and sensitive to
stress. They experience a wide range
of emotions and tend to be success-
driven, perfectionistic, and eager to
improve. Always feeling the need to
do more, have more, and be more,
Turbulent types may forget how
exhausting this dissatisfaction can be – both for themselves and for the people
around them.
While the Assertive variant may seem more positive on the surface, that is not
necessarily the case. Turbulent individuals are more willing than Assertive types to
change jobs if they feel stuck in their current roles, and they think deeply about the
direction of their lives. Turbulent individuals may also outperform Assertive types in
certain instances, because they may care more about the outcome. The willingness
of Turbulent types to push themselves may ultimately enable them to achieve their
goals.
Worldwide, Japan is by far the most Turbulent country, with an average score of 57.48%
on the Turbulent side. Italy (53.8%) and Brunei (52.89%) come in second and third,
respectively. On the Assertive side of the spectrum, we have Uganda (57.91%),
Barbados (57.11%), and Nigeria (57.01%).
In the United States, there is a clear east-west divide, with the East Coast being
significantly more Turbulent. West Virginia (49.3%) takes the lead on the Turbulent
side, followed by Rhode Island (48.84%) and Maine (48.73%). The most Assertive
states are New Mexico (54.7%), Colorado (54.66%), and Hawaii (54.28%).

Type Groups
Now you know what each type consists of. But how do they fit together?
Our system has two layers: the first (inner) one defines our Roles, the second (outer)
one, our Strategies.
Roles
The Role layer determines our goals, interests, and preferred activities. Each of the
four Roles covers a set of personality types that are very similar, and we will use these
groups later in this profile to draw contrasts and similarities between personalities.
They also serve to highlight the importance we have placed on the Energy trait. Each
personality type will share either the Observant or the Intuitive trait with all other
members of their group, as well as one other key trait. Logicians belong to the Analyst
Role group, along with three other personality types: Architects, Commanders, and
Debaters.
Analysts
Shared traits: Intuitive and Thinking
The personality types in the Analyst Role – Architects, Logicians, Commanders, and
Debaters – embrace rationality, excelling in intellectual and technological pursuits.
The Thinking trait makes Analysts exacting, and the Intuitive trait lets them apply
their minds to almost anything, with their imaginations aiding calculated, strategic
thinking, or seeing just how far the rabbit hole goes with a crazy scheme or thought
experiment.

These personalities are driven to understand and create, and have no problem
switching between speculative musing and frank, solutions-oriented approaches to
whatever problems are at hand. Broad, intelligent vision gives Analysts an ingenious
air, but they can become overwhelmed and scattered if they don’t learn to hone
these abilities and use them to advance a worthwhile cause or project.
The biggest pitfall is that their intellect can give them a false sense of accomplishment.
They tend to prefer the world of ideas to the sober reality of follow-through, and by
assuming the role of critic instead of participant, Analysts sometimes risk being
functionally outpaced by those who simply sit down and do the work. They can earn
themselves the unsavory title of “armchair analysts” while those with more real-world
experience continue to create real results. Analyst personality types can lack a proper
respect for those of simpler vision and expression, whatever their background, and
it can hold them back.
Analysts value their intellect above all else, and it can be a challenge convincing them
it’s worth checking their many hypotheses with an experiment or proper evidence to
be sure. To many Analysts, if something makes sense in their minds, that’s as good
as proved, and a great deal faster. Analysts can be brilliant, but they’re still human;
under the influence of ego, these personality types can get in the habit of advancing
clever opinions instead of objective facts.
Analysts’ positive self-identity stems largely from their formidable drive to learn, and
their clever and sharply witty banter can make them excellent debate partners. Often
insatiable readers as well, Analysts can be found stockpiling books, questioning
teachers, and driving conversations in forums across the world wide web. These
types prefer their own processes and pace, and are energized by exercising their
minds on their own time.

Analysts are also relentless self-improvers. Once they’ve recognized a flaw, they
apply all of this cold rationality, honest reflection, imagination, and desire for results
to make it right. Analysts’ forceful, imaginative vision, when trained and focused,
enables these personalities to conceive and accomplish things most thought
impossible.
Diplomats
Shared traits: Intuitive and Feeling
Diplomats – Advocates, Mediators, Protagonists, and Campaigners – tend to be warm,
caring, and generous individuals, shining in diplomacy and counselling. These
personality types promote cooperation and harmony, tolerating discord only as a
step towards positive change. Their perceptive abilities seemingly go deeper than the
traditional senses – it’s as if they have a full set of tuning forks in their hearts that can
resonate with people’s emotional states, and this empathetic sensitivity creates deep
connections with others.
This is not as mystical as it can seem. Diplomat personalities deeply value
understanding, and a lifetime of self-reflection grants them insights into others’
motivations that they might not even understand themselves. Diplomats can use this
to shape the way others feel, but it would be out of character for them to use this for
ill.
Diplomats’ people skills nurture friendship and healing with pure, genuine empathy.
Causing distress feels to them like wounding their own psyche, so they prefer to
gently nudge loved ones and strangers alike in a positive direction. Diplomats find
the ideals of humanism rewarding: kindness, understanding, altruism, and growth

warm them like a bonfire on a chilly autumn day. These personality types envision a
prismatic, kind world.
The Intuitive trait plays a big part in this optimism, but it also makes Diplomats
sensitive to injustices that would jeopardize that ideal world. They can be aggressive
against forces they perceive as evil, and are capable of steely action when they feel
they have moral high ground. Diplomats’ sensitive emotions may flare to outright
combativeness if provoked; with self-righteous momentum and weighty ideals, these
personality types can steamroll others. If they let inspiration trump rationality
unchecked, they can sometimes go too far, damaging the very causes they hold dear,
however justified the outrage.
Tempering this passion with cold practicality is a challenge for Diplomats. They are
often reluctant to make and carry out tough decisions or plans lacking in empathy,
and often struggle with carrying out a plan at all. They find greater satisfaction in
abstract self-exploration and understanding the issues that affect those least able to
defend themselves than mundane accomplishments and day-to-day tasks.
Diplomats emphasize experience and understanding rather than calculable
achievement.
Among friends and family, Diplomat personalities can range from quietly caring to
brightly gregarious, so long as they can pursue the mutual exchange of thoughts and
feelings they value so highly. But they can overextend themselves in this more
personal aspect of their lives as well – emotionally, physically, or even financially.
Diplomats’ open hearts make them vulnerable when others aren’t as considerate,
though they wouldn’t have it any other way. Someone must trust first, and they will
almost always be the volunteer.

Diplomats embrace travel as readily as anyone – they like exploring other cultures
and people’s colorful ways. These personality types are creatively inclined, often
practicing artistic expression in diverse forms, and see magical beauty where others
see the hum-drum of daily life. For a group with such progressive attitudes, they also
appreciate seeing things as they are, a pure expression of a way of thinking and being.
Diplomats can be passionately inspired by experiences: music, cuisine, theater,
nature, and anything else that goes beyond the obvious can rise to divine art in their
eyes.
Like a gardener planting in fertile earth, Diplomats seed the world around them with
progressive change and gentle beauty. Diplomats feel connected to forces they may
not fully understand, a deep sense of faith that may express itself, if not always
through traditional religion, as spiritual belief. Diplomats pursue things with an
underlying idealism and a sense of higher purpose; activism, spirituality, healing, the
arts, and charity are common interests for these personalities. They have a conviction
to serve a greater good, motivated by intangible rewards felt in the heart and soul.
Sentinels
Shared traits: Observant and Judging
Sentinels – Logisticians, Defenders, Executives, and Consuls – are cooperative and
practical. Their grounded approach helps them feel comfortable with who they are,
defining themselves not by individualism, but by character and competence. These
personality types seek order, security, and stability, and tend to work hard to
maintain the way of things, leading to a deserved reputation as the core of any group
or organization, from family to church to the office and the factory floor.

These types embrace teamwork, but expect the same performance and
respectability from others that they strive for themselves. Sentinels often dislike
strident nonconformity because they envision progress through collaboration and
hard work within a known set of rules – to let everyone do their own thing on a whim
would be anarchy. Sentinels prefer proven methods and honest accomplishment to
self-indulgent exploration and esoteric ideas. Because these personalities are deeply
prudent, they also tend to be self-motivated, and rarely need external inspiration to
be productive.
Their grounded perspective leaves little room for random musings, but Sentinels are
not unimaginative. They experiment for anticipated gain rather than intellectual
thrills, and excel in making challenging situations work. Revolution does not appeal
to people from this Role, who tend to learn from the past and remain loyal to the
tested truths and traditions they were brought up with. Where some see fascinating
philosophy, Sentinels may see preposterousness: these personality types favor
practiced methodology over abstract theory.
Having authority allows Sentinels to practice their virtues. Effective in leadership
roles, these types motivate others by energetic example and feel satisfaction from
guiding a well-functioning group – they tend to make excellent teachers, managers,
and community officials, as well as parents and hosts. These personalities are
meticulous and traditional, excelling in logistical and administrative fields with clear
hierarchies and rules as well. Opting for successful completion whenever they can,
Sentinels can be controlling, but gladly compromise when needed to get things done.
Sentinels feel rewarded by shepherding others, and enjoy coordinating and sharing
fun social experiences with friends and family. They believe it is their responsibility
to give their families safe, happy lives that prepare them for the real world. An

appreciation of strong relationships allows them to share generously with those they
respect and love – these types feel bolstered by having reliable people in their lives,
and will do what they can to make sure they hold up their end of the bargain.
Birthdays, dinner parties, and camping trips are delightful events under their
enthusiastic direction.
These personality types are happiest without drama, though their admirably
stubborn loyalty can certainly attract it if they feel they need to stand by a friend,
regardless of whether they’re in the right or wrong. Inconsistent people can test
Sentinels’ tolerance and provoke harsh judgement. Sentinels tend to prefer
predictability over novelty and familiar pleasures more than cutting-edge excitement.
It can be difficult for Sentinel personalities to accept people who lack their studious
ideals, but they often respond as engaged and caring mentors to those who wish to
grow in that direction.
Explorers
Shared traits: Observant and Prospecting
Explorers – Virtuosos, Adventurers, Entrepreneurs, and Entertainers – possess a self-
reliant mix of enthusiasm, quick thinking, and ingenuity that can lead to impressive
personal and professional accomplishments. Comfortable with uncertainty and
minimally concerned with preparation, these personality types simply adapt and
overcome as events present themselves. Explorers’ flexibility helps them make snap
decisions in the moment, and they’re unlikely to dwell on the future or the past.
They aren’t obsessed with precise detail (unless they’re really in the zone, in which
case they can muster a level of precision and focus that would make a seasoned
engineer blush). Usually, they require workability rather than perfection. Explorer

personalities are utilitarian masters of diverse tools and techniques, ranging from
instruments and engines to the art of persuasion, and they distinguish themselves in
crises, crafts, and sales.
This versatile decisiveness doesn’t mean commitment, however. Explorers can
change their minds with minimal regret or second-guessing. People in this Role
dislike monotony, and often feel tempted to stray from obligations in favor of
entertaining new things. They experiment with many interests and live and breathe
whatever they connect with – for a time. If these personality types sometimes leave
business unfinished, let clutter build up, or misplace important things, it’s because
they’ve moved on to something fresh.
Explorers enjoy being free of obligations, where they can indulge themselves or their
interests on their own time. An Explorer might design and build their own dream
house, enthralled with the process, but end up procrastinating on simple repairs
after a few years. They are highly motivated when steering themselves through
something interesting, but don’t like being restrained by anything “mandatory.”
Their relaxed, free-form attitude makes Explorer personalities socially dynamic as
well. They often seek out people and experiences that cater to their senses, finding
more pleasure in stimulation than planning. They happily approach appealing
strangers and interesting experiences, and when things get in the way of a good time,
they apply their ingenuity to getting around it. Explorers want to see what happens
next!
The same themes run through their friendships and families, though these
relationships have much more staying power than most other interests. Rather than
forcing relationships into or out of existence though, Explorers let things flow

naturally according to their desires. Compatible people simply become a part of their
lives. These personality types tend to be individualistic and freedom-loving, going
their own way with little regard for naysayers, but they do enjoy knowing that the
people they trust will be around in the end.
Explorers are highly spontaneous, connecting with and adapting to their
environment in a way that is almost childlike in its wonder and sheer fun. It can be a
challenge for them to work for things with a distant or unexciting payoff, as they need
a sense of immediacy to feel truly engaged, but when they are passionate, Explorer
personalities can move heaven and earth.
Strategies
The Strategy layer reflects our preferred ways of doing things and achieving our goals.
There are four strategies: Confident Individualism, People Mastery, Constant
Improvement, and Social Engagement. Depending on their type variant, Logicians fall
under either Confident Individualism (Assertive Logicians) or Constant Improvement
(Turbulent Logicians).
Confident Individualism
Shared traits: Introverted and Assertive
Confident Individualists typically trust in themselves, and they often embrace
solitude to pursue their own interests rather than seeking out social activity.
Fascinated by personal projects, people following this Strategy often have an
impressive range of skills and interesting ideas. But projects are usually only pursued
for their own merit – Confident Individualists tend to feel that social displays and
bragging are time and energy wasted. These personality types are proud of who they

are, what they know, and what they can do, but they don’t feel the need to prove
themselves to others.
Confident Individualists engage their internal inspiration instead of searching for
motivation outside themselves. They favor privacy, and aren’t particularly fond of
interacting with society, whether in a strictly social sense or when embracing broader
societal goals. These personalities often favor substance over superficiality and
personal honesty over playing along, and prefer a utilitarian approach, even when
pursuing esoteric goals.
This utilitarianism also means that Confident Individualists are not easily drawn into
emotional drama. They hold their own opinions firmly, but tend to see little reason
to try to convince others. When drama does arise, these personality types express
their truth with little concern over whether they’ll cause friction or offense. Confident
Individualists tend to endorse self-reliance over cooperation, and are rarely
pressured into agreeing with or lending support to others unless they believe in the
cause.
This relaxed self-assurance means that Confident Individualists may not push their
boundaries. Their live-and-let-live attitude goes both ways: they don’t need to
convince others, and they tend to expect others to return the favor. While highly
capable, they can miss information and opportunities that challenge their views
because they simply don’t place much importance on factoring in others’ approval.
They can be tolerant in disagreement though, respecting others’ individualism just
as they respect their own.
When these personality types form friendships, they tend to be strong and honest.
Because these types don’t feel like they need other people’s approval, their loyalty

and affection is a deliberate expression of affection. Impressing a Confident
Individualist earns their respect and care, and these types make for dedicated,
passionate friends.
Self-reliance is central for these types, and they handle difficult situations well
because they tend to be emotionally secure, bold, and resistant to stress. They rarely
seek leadership or the spotlight, but when they do find themselves in these positions,
these personalities lead by an example of self-determination and uncomplicated
honesty – they appreciate grace, class, and form, and rarely seek to impress by
appearances alone. When acting with knowledge and wisdom, Confident
Individualists can be noble pillars of strength.
People Mastery
Shared traits: Extraverted and Assertive
People Masters are highly stress-resistant, maintaining confidence through life’s
challenges, social pressures, and any questions of their capabilities. These
personality types seek social contact and have solid communication skills, feeling at
ease when relying on or directing other people. People Masters’ mantra is fearless
engagement – to be is to do. This is not a group known for its timid opinions or
idleness.
People Masters feel rewarded by stimulation and challenging experiences. They like
travelling to see things, people, and places, where they can experience a richer
understanding of the world around them. These personalities like sampling new
foods, lifestyles, and cultures; even things they don’t end up liking can be entertaining
excitement for them.

Sometimes, though, People Masters are too confident. Insulated against self-doubt
and the need to prove themselves, they don’t always test, or even consider, their own
limits or ambitions. They can slip into a pattern of endless fun and comfort-seeking,
rolling their eyes at those who press themselves towards more intimidating goals. At
the other end of the spectrum, these personality types can just as easily ignore
sensible caution, putting themselves in extraordinary and dangerous situations,
confident they can find their way through.
Most fall somewhere in the middle, embracing healthy ambition and competition so
long as they play a meaningful part in social circles and leadership. Social interaction
plays a big part in People Masters’ happiness. While not dependent on people’s
approval for emotional security, they appreciate acclaim for their accomplishments
and bright personalities, and can be a touch showy from time to time. These types
are self-confident, but they are often lost without people to lead, laugh with, and love.
Their charisma, self-assurance and boisterousness can sometimes be trying qualities.
People Masters prefer cooperation, but have few qualms about dominating their
opposition to achieve their goals, boldly promoting themselves and using their social
skills to get ahead. This Strategy understands people’s needs, but can just as easily
use this as a weapon rather than a tool of compassion if they have their sights set on
something big.
People Masters can compromise when needed, but these personality types tend to
be better talkers than listeners. They can be very demanding, criticizing people’s
performance regardless of their feelings because they expect no less of themselves.
That said, these types are moderate in their disagreements because their ego and
confidence aren’t at stake the way they often are for Turbulent Strategies. People
Masters are not fond of grudges, content to let bygones be bygones. They are more

likely to be socially idealistic, with the intent of bringing people together to make
things happen – petty grievances just get in the way.
People Masters’ charismatic virtues shine in social contexts, and these types have
little fear of rejection and a passion for inclusion. They prefer to take the lead, but
sharing the journey through other people’s eyes enhances their own enjoyment as
well. People Masters share in all aspects of people’s lives, making these personalities
strong, honest friends, parents, spouses, and colleagues, serving as wellsprings of
energy, joy, and mutual success.
Constant Improvement
Shared traits: Introverted and Turbulent
Constant Improvers are sensitive and contemplative individuals who enjoy having
their own space and freedom. They are often deep and creative individuals, though
often tense and more comfortable on their own than mixed up in the judgment of
the real world. With the two personality traits most representative of a sensitivity to
their environment – Introversion and Turbulence – they are reserved when dealing
with strangers or new situations, often turning inwards or focusing on peacekeeping
instead.
These personalities’ caution in the face of unfamiliar challenges can sometimes look
like a lack of motivation, but this is usually just self-doubt – Constant Improvers have
a strong drive, but it comes paired with a strong fear of failure. They invest a great
deal of their identity in their successes, and even a minor misstep or embarrassment
can be crushing.

The vigilance learned from a lifetime of ups and downs gives these personality types
a knack for sensing trouble. This is a strategic wariness that can be quite useful in
situations that need to balance risk and reward, whether a financial investment or a
romantic opportunity. Though they can seem frustratingly over-cautious to others,
Constant Improvers would rather not face calamity, so they excel at avoiding it with
preventive insights.
Since they aren’t always comfortable with energetic exchanges with other people,
Constant Improvers often direct their attention elsewhere, striving to master hobbies,
careers, bodies of knowledge, or new means of self-expression. Their restless drive,
self-doubt, and solitary mentality can combine to create impressive, beautiful results.
High-achieving and perfectionistic, Constant Improvers generally try to do their best
in their endeavors, dedicating tremendous time and energy. These personalities can
put so much pressure on themselves that they diminish their own impressive
accomplishments by fixating on the slightest flaws or dismissing successes as luck
rather than skill or dedication.
Taken too far, this perfectionism can also drive endless rumination – an unhealthy
obsession with perfection will reveal flaws in the best plans, and Constant Improvers
often feel forced to abandon a course of action because something doesn’t line up
right. Whether working feverishly or picking at the threads of an idea though,
Constant Improvers can be intense about their goals, and progress towards internal
balance can lead them to amazing personal accomplishments.
Alongside their personal efforts, these personality types also care a great deal what
others think of them. This can be very useful, but they can take this to a fault: fixating
on others’ expectations can sour social efforts into awkwardness. Constant

Improvers are easily thrown off-balance by conflict, and may communicate timidly,
or not at all, for fear of hurting people’s feelings, provoking a confrontation, or
looking the fool.
Sometimes it takes peer approval and active encouragement for this Strategy group
to recognize their own virtues. These personalities often benefit from friends and
colleagues patient enough to get to know them and who give them a chance to speak
their minds. When treated considerately, these types become devoted partners and
begin to reveal their kindness, insights, heartfelt support, and the complexities of
their approach to the world, from sometimes (oddly specific) plans for obscure
situations to starry-eyed ambitions.
Social Engagement
Shared traits: Extraverted and Turbulent
Those with the Social Engagement Strategy are an interesting group. In some ways,
Extraversion and Turbulence conflict with each other: Extraversion leads to risk-
tolerance and boldness; Turbulence reflects self-doubt and sensitivity. Turbulence
also contributes to impulsivity, which Extraversion makes highly visible. This means
Social Engagers tend to do what comes naturally first and think about it later. In this
way, they are almost an exaggeration of their underlying personality types. This isn’t
a bad thing.
Social Engagers enthusiastically engage the external world, not content to live in their
minds, drawing emotional security from positive interactions. In business and among
loved ones, these types are usually the center of attention. Social Engagers meet the
needs of the crowd in social settings, but they sometimes hide their true selves to
impress other people. They appreciate social status, and often portray themselves

as the person they aspire to – usually a purer form of their personality type – in order
to achieve it.
Social Engagers often experience stunning highs and lows as their Extraversion
pushes their Turbulent need for success into overdrive and their Turbulence creates
an immediate sense of regret, warranted or not. These personality types can be
surprisingly competitive, measuring themselves against peers and hoping others
notice their accomplishments, then retreat, suddenly becoming averse to conflict,
leading them to apologize for or avoid confrontations – even those that ended in
beneficial discussions.
These personalities may falter occasionally in their self-confidence, but ultimately
they are driven to improve and achieve. At the end of the day, they have no trouble
blowing off some steam and enjoying a much-needed break, either. Social Engagers
enthusiastically pursue stimulating and exciting experiences, especially with a group
of friends. They much prefer to dive into an experience than to sit down for a
reserved evaluation, though many will naturally regret their hot-headed lack of
planning down the road.
This push and pull between ambition and alarm, impulse and caution, highs and lows
can itself be quite stressful, but it’s all part of this Strategy’s charm. These personality
types are often restless in pursuit of their goals to improve their circumstances, but
show their passion by indulging their desires through some earned fun (and maybe
shopping for something impressive). Social Engagers work hard at their personal and
professional development, striving to meet all manner of stringent standards, but
they lead dynamic lives as well, filled with companionship, sharing adventures and
accomplishments with others whenever possible. Whatever direction they pull, they
are sure to pull the crowd with them.

All contents copyright ©2011-2018 NERIS Analytics Limited. All rights reserved. This document is intended for personal
use only and no part of it may be translated, shared, reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means
(electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher.
The publisher has used its best efforts in preparing this document, and the information provided herein is provided
"as is." NERIS Analytics Limited will assume no liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any
loss or damage related directly or indirectly to the information in this document (including any action or inaction
taken or not taken as result of the information contained herein). Any decisions that you make once you have read
this document are for you alone and we won’t be liable for the consequences of any such decisions.
No warranties of any kind, express or implied, are made, and the publisher specifically disclaims any implied
warranties of fitness for any particular purpose. The publisher will provide no remedy for indirect, consequential,
punitive, incidental, or other damages arising from this document, including such from negligence, strict liability, or
breach of warranty or contract, even after notice of the possibility of such damages.
The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, medical, financial, or other professional services. The information in
this document is educational in nature, is provided only as general information, and is not psychological advice.
Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt doesn’t constitute a psychologist-client
relationship. Furthermore, this information is not intended to be used to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease
or psychological disorder.
This document is only available for purchase at https://www.16personalities.com. If you
have downloaded this document from any other website or if it has been included in any
service not provided by NERIS Analytics Limited, please be aware this is very likely an
unauthorized copy. In such and similar cases, we would be very grateful if you could get
in touch with us via our website at https://www.16personalities.com/contact-us so that
we could investigate. Thank you!

Logician INTP

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Logician INTP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What’s in This Profile?

What’s in This Profile?

relationships, academic path, career and professional development, as well as their

share the Logician personality type.

“The Logician” (INTP, -A/-T) 2

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... 3

Who Is “The Logician?” ....................................................................................................... 7

Theory Overview .............................................................................................................. 11

Five Personality Aspects .............................................................................................. 11

Mind: Introverted (I) vs. Extraverted (E) .................................................................. 11

Energy: Intuitive (N) vs. Observant (S) .................................................................... 12

Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) .......................................................................... 14

Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting (P) ..................................................................... 16

Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T) ................................................................. 17

Type Groups .................................................................................................................. 18

Personal Growth .............................................................................................................. 28

Motivation and Development ..................................................................................... 30

“The Logician” (INTP, -A/-T) 3

Romantic Relationships ................................................................................................... 64

Potential Role Pairings ................................................................................................. 68

Logician–Analyst Relationships ............................................................................... 69

Logician–Diplomat Relationships ............................................................................ 76

Logician–Sentinel Relationships .............................................................................. 82

Logician–Explorer Relationships ............................................................................. 88

Logicians and Friends of Other Types ........................................................................ 97

Logician–Analyst Friendships .................................................................................. 98

Logician–Diplomat Friendships ............................................................................. 106

Logician–Sentinel Friendships ............................................................................... 112

Logician–Explorer Friendships .............................................................................. 119

Parenthood ..................................................................................................................... 127

Parenting for Each Stage of Development ............................................................... 129

Building Bonds (Birth–1½ Years) ........................................................................... 130

Testing Boundaries (1½–3 Years) .......................................................................... 134

Thirst for Knowledge (3–5 Years) .......................................................................... 138

Creating Competence (5–12 Years) ....................................................................... 143

Finding Thyself (12–18 Years) ................................................................................ 146

“The Logician” (INTP, -A/-T) 4

Academic Path ................................................................................................................ 154

How Logicians Learn .................................................................................................. 155

Logicians in High School ............................................................................................ 161

Work or College?......................................................................................................... 167

Logicians in College .................................................................................................... 175

Lifelong Learning ........................................................................................................ 181

Professional Development ............................................................................................ 189

Jobs and Skill Sets ....................................................................................................... 192

Challenging Career Qualities ................................................................................. 195

Career Alternatives ................................................................................................. 197

Workplace Cooperation Between Roles................................................................... 200

Logician–Analyst Cooperation ............................................................................... 200

Logician–Diplomat Cooperation............................................................................ 207

Logician–Sentinel Cooperation.............................................................................. 213

Logician–Explorer Cooperation ............................................................................. 219

Final Words ..................................................................................................................... 226

The Puzzle of Personality .............................................................................................. 229

Five Personality Aspects ............................................................................................ 233

Mind: Introverted (I) vs. Extraverted (E) ................................................................ 233

Energy: Intuitive (N) vs. Observant (S) .................................................................. 236

“The Logician” (INTP, -A/-T) 5

Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) ........................................................................ 239

Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting (P) ................................................................... 241

Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T) ............................................................... 244

Type Groups ................................................................................................................ 246

Strategies ................................................................................................................. 254

“The Logician” (INTP, -A/-T) 6