Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

PSYCHOLOGY PAPER 3 STUDY GUIDE

QUESTION 1A AND 1C - RESEARCH METHODS


Lab Experiment artificiality of the setting may cause unnatural
The researcher manipulates the independent behaviour which wouldn’t reflect real life,
variable but conducts the experiment in a hence the reliability decreases.
controlled environment.
due to being a standardised process, it’s
easier to replicate

Quasi Experiment reactions of test subjects may be more


Participants are grouped based on a genuine due to the non-artificial research
characteristic of interest, such as gender, environment
ethnicity, or scores on a depression scale.
lack of control over variables + cannot be
repeated - reliability cannot be checked

Natural Experiment Can be used in situations where it may be


Researchers find naturally occurring variables unethical to manipulate independent
and study them variables

more expensive/time consuming than, for


example, lab experiments

Field Experiment More likely to reflect real life due to the


The researcher manipulates the independent natural setting (supports reliability)
variable but conducts the experiment in a
real life environment Less control over the extra variables that ​may
cause bias results.

Correlation useful for predicting variables + useful for


Correlation is the measurement of how two investigating variables that are impossible,
variables are related and to what extent they unethical or impractical to study otherwise
are related
does not establish the cause and effect
between variables

They provide straightforward quantitative


comparisons allowing for both statistical
analysis and clarity of interpretation

Covert Observation Researcher can direct the study toward


Participants are not aware of being studied, specific directions, they can develop a theory
have no consent. and refine sampling for the next phase of the
investigation.

Participants are unaware of being part of a


study and could be dishonest in justifying the
reason behind their presence

Overt Observation Observer can openly take notes, participants


Participants know they are being observed. are aware of observation.
Participants know that they’re being
observed so this may influence their
behaviour - the Hawthorne effect.

Participant Observation Shows 2 simple points of view (one for


When the observer takes part in the situation observed and the researcher/participant)
whilst doing research
Time consuming method

Non-Participant Observation Allows researchers to see what’s going on


When the researcher is not a part of the with their own eyes - easier to make
study. judgements and observe peoples’ behaviour.

Observer cannot interfere in the study, do not


have clarity about certain events on
activities, + cannot clear doubts by asking
various questions to the group members.

Structured Interview The researcher has to have a specific set of


an appropriate method when there is a need questions laid out for the participants to
to collect in-depth information on answer
people’s opinions, thoughts,
experiences, and feelings Very controlled amount of data wanted, the
researcher cannot ask a question to one
person and not the other

Semi-Structured Interview Interviewer uses an interview guide that


usually lists themes to be pursued, but allows
A research interview involves an interviewer, for flexibility of approach.
who coordinates the process of the
conversation, and asks questions, and Has a mixture of structured and
an interviewee open-response questions.

Unstructured Interview No restricted questions, sensitive topics, ask


freely

You can talk differently to everyone (usually


about life stories, specific situations)

Case Study Allows for investigation of topics that can’t be


qualitative method that consists of an experiments or tested on.
in-depth investigation on an individual a
group of people or an organization Provides room to develop information on a
pre-existing theory/discovery

L: Difficult to see if related studies make up


one case study or are just dealing with the
same question (confounding variables)
QUESTION 1B - SAMPLING
Opportunity Non-probability sampling i.e. does not involve
random selection

Drawn from a convenient available population


and may not be representative of a
population outside of this.

Random A probability sample in which everyone in the


target population had the same probability of
being chosen

Increases population validity, b.c sample less


likely to be biased however if target
population contains a lot of different types of
people, random sampling could still generate
a biased sample

Self-selecting Non-probability - participants are volunteers

People that sign up are less likely to drop out


due to motivation, however it could lead to a
sample that is not representative of target
population

Purposive Non-probability - participants are selected


based on salient/unique characteristics
relevant to the research topic such as gender,
age, attitudes, social roles, or specific life
experiences

Stratified Probability - attempts to make a sample that


reflects the sub-groups within a target
population.

Can be helpful in finding people more


efficiently

Snowball Non-probability - used when you’re looking


for participants from a specific group which
would not respond to an ad in a paper

Helps find people more efficiently, and also


builds trust with researcher
QUESTION 2 - ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Ethical consideration Description

Informed consent When the participant is informed of the research before it takes
place

Debriefing The nature, results and conclusions of the research need to be


made available to participants as soon as possible

Confidentiality Research data will not be known to anyone outside the study.
This may also require the researcher to change minor details in
the report to avoid releasing identity of participant.

Anonymity Identity of the participants should not be known outside the


research team. → researcher does not know their info.

Protection of Researchers should take preventive action in all research to


participants from harm avoid physically, psychologically or sexually harm them.

Right to withdraw Participation is voluntary, they can leave any time they want

No fabrication of data Any errors should be later corrected

Deception is to be Info is withheld from the participant (or is directly lied to). When
Avoided deceived, participants should be informed about this at the
earliest possible opportunity

QUESTION 3

Internal validity Internal validity refers to the rigour of the study


and the extent to which the researcher took
alternative explanations into account.

Validity Validity is the degree to which the results


accurately reflect what the research is measuring.

Credibility This term is used in qualitative research to


indicate whether or not the findings of the study
are congruent
with the participants’ perceptions and
experiences.

~External Validity External validity is the extent to which the results


of a study can be generalized or transferred to
another sample or context.

Report
- How primary and incidental results are reported
- Importance of considering risk and benefits of reporting to participants
- Case by case decision made by ethics committee

Apply
- Generalizability
- Limitations that could impact credibility/internal validity
- replicability/reliability

You might also like