value most can be surprising: long stories, in-depth coverage and journalistic investigation that offers new perspectives. That's the conclusion of a recent study that evaluated a pioneering suite of media analyzes used by the American Press Institute (API) to track reader engagement.
Drawn from more than 400,000 subjects and 55
publications, the study's results challenge the view that the only thing people want are "soft stuff (Justin Bieber), quick topics without depth, or 'article-lists'" (' 7 things you should know about Donald Trump's hair," says API executive director Tom Rosenstiel.
The conventional wisdom that writing for the
Internet should be short and snappy, and that writing for mobile apps should be even shorter, simply does not correspond to the truth," writes Rosenstiel.
In one of his works, "Solving journalism's hidden
problem: Terrible analytics", Tom Rosenstiel claims that the average was misled by conventional systematic analysis of data – audience measurement indicators that usually measure the wrong things or offer illusory statistics that They exaggerate the number of readers. Rosenstiel assesses that websites overcount – more than double, perhaps triple – the true number of readers.
Seeking to go beyond audience counting, the
American Press Institute and associated publications developed an "Involvement Index" that mixes about a dozen indicators measuring visit time, the number of page views and the times on that was shared. An audience survey was also conducted, but instead of examining editorial opinions of the news, the researchers asked people questions "about their lives – their passions, their concerns and their community."
The main point, according to Tom Rosenstiel, is that
new audiences want "journalism that identifies new behaviors", of good quality and journalistic reports that dedicate time, resources and the necessary talent to delve into a subject. Although business – and investigative – reporting requires extraordinary commitment, the reward comes, according to the study, with greater commitment on the part of readers (48% per cent).