Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communication in Classroom - Group 1
Communication in Classroom - Group 1
Communication in Classroom - Group 1
Arranged By:
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
Having a plan of action means that the teacher knows what he or she wants to
do in the classroom. The teacher has something to communicate to the students. But
having something to communicate is not the same thing as actually communicating it.
To achieve this, the plan of action must be carried out in the context of interaction. The
teacher must engage in the sort of interaction with the learners which will enable
communication to take place Where there is no interaction, but only action and
reaction, there can be no communication. Where there is conflict in the interaction,
communication breaks down. Only where there is cooperation between both sides
involved in the interaction can communication effectively take place, and learning
occur.
Knowing what you want to do, and what you want to communicate to your
students, in the classroom is a good start. Doing it, actually achieving communication,
requires a lot more effort and expertise.
CONTENT
Communication implies more than one person. There must be someone to transmit a
message, and someone to receive it. The average classroom contains between twenty and
sixty people. There are, therefore, any number of possible variations on who does the
transmitting and who does the receiving. If we take the teacher as the one transmitting a
message, then he or she can be seen as trying to communicate with the whole class, a group
of students, or an individual student at different points of the lesson. In the preceding
sections, interaction between the teacher and the whole class was stressed, but there are
activities where the teacher is a participant in interaction with an individual student, or with
a group of students within the class.
Teachers and students are not the only participants in classroom interaction. In many
classrooms, lessons closely follow procedures laid down in a textbook. In such cases, the
textbook writer can be seen as the transmitter of a message, communicating indirectly with
the teacher and students in the classroom.
Teachers, students, and textbook writers are thus the participants in classroom
interaction. They communicate with each other in various combinations. They
communicate with each other in very different ways, with teachers and students being in a
much more direct and apparent relationship.
Similarly, a textbook writer will communicate more easily with the teachers and
students for whom the book is written if he or she shares, or is at least aware of, their
particular experience and expectations of classroom learning and teaching.
Communication is undertaken for a purpose. There is always so for transmitting a
message to someone else. The classroom situation, like...any other social situation, involves
gathering people together for a specific purpose: in this case, the purpose of learning.
Although learning is the focus of classroom communication, not all of the latter is
pedagogic in nature. People have other reasons for communicating in the classroom. In
common with all other social settings, there is the need to establish and maintain personal
relationships. The teacher has to establish a rapport with the class, and with the individuals
of which the class is composed. Individual students form different sorts of relationships
with each other and take up different attitudes towards the teacher.
A teacher can set out to be harsh, strict, and authoritarian with a class; or kind, tolerant,
and permissive. He or she can remain at a formal distance from the students, or become
involved with all of them their personal lives, their hopes, and their problems. Similarly,
students can adopt different attitudes in the classroom.
Another reason for classroom communication stems from the formal nature of the
classroom situation itself, and the need to organize it for learning purposes. Attendance
registers have to be taken, books given out or taken in, furniture arranged to facilitate
teaching and learning activities, - and so on. Much classroom communication therefore
centres on organization and administration, matters necessary to the learning process, but
not directly pedagogic in themselves.
The content of communication, the actual message being transmitted, is closely linked
to the purpose of communication. Thus, in a language classroom, communication with a
pedagogic purpose will have a strictly pedagogic content: information about the grammar
or the use of the language; information about how linguistic skills, such as those of reading
or listening, operate in that particular language; information about the speakers of the
language and the culture they adhere to. This can be termed the classroom transaction, the
communication of information, and is clearly in the control of the teacher, or the textbook
writer, the possessor of the information When it comes to communication for more personal
purposes, this can be seen as the classroom interaction, the establishment of rapport and a
sense of community. The content of the messages being transmitted here is very different.
It is personal interaction of this kind that is responsible for the overall classroom
atmosphere, or ambience. The teacher can do much to create a positive atmosphere, but the
influence of the learners and their attitudes is equally important. The particular interplay of
personalities in any one classroom can often produce quite unpredictable results.
But language is not the only means of communicating the pedagogic messages of the
classroom. The teacher can use a demonstration or mine, can draw pictures, or show
pictures of a still or moving variety. He or she can employ diagrams and charts, or use
specially developed gestures, to get the message across. Good teaching involves using a
variety of resources and knowing which to use to communicate a message most effectively.
Similarly, if a teacher tells a group of students, 'Move these two desks together, and
then put those chairs on top', with an organizational purpose, he wants the furniture moved.
If he gives the same instructions as part of a listening comprehension exercise, he is
interested only in whether the students understand him or not and can carry out his
instructions precisely.
In the first case in each example, we have language used conventionally to achieve a
social purpose. In the second case, we have language used as a methodological device to
achieve a pedagogic purpose. The Simple Past tense is elicited by asking a question; it
could have been elicited by showing a picture, or performing a mime, with a gesture of
pointing over the shoulder to indicate 'last night' or 'yesterday'. Listening comprehension is
tested by referring to furniture in the immediate classroom situation; it could have been
tested by referring to wooden blocks on the students' desks, pictures in the students' books,
to a diagram on the blackboard.
❖ Verbal communication
❖ Nonverbal communication
❖ Written communication
Teachers and students interact with one another in many different contexts and use all
three of these types of communication
Verbal communication can correct the mistake and correct it. When a student is acting
incorrectly the teacher shows him the correct way towards a solution. Feedback is the ability
of a teacher to give their verbal opinion and improve students.
Nonverbal communication refers to body language that people express or the process
of conveying meaning in the form of non-word messages.
• Gestures
• Body language
• Facial expression
• Eye contact
• How one dress.
Subconsciously student is idealizing his teacher and they establish mutual trust.
Teachers should use positive body language. For example, frequently crossing your arms
can make students self-protective and make it look as if you're closing yourself off from
communication. Students should be encouraged by clapping. A teacher should smile to
approve of their good deeds. Greet students with "Good Morning" and "Good Bye" at the
end of class or day daily. It is a good technique to start a day and also helps students to learn
courteous behavior. Greet students by name which inspires students in the classroom.
Some of the attributes of nonverbal communication in humans are to complement and
illustrate, to strengthen and accentuate, to replace and surrogate, to be in command of and
take control, and to challenge the denotative message.
Written communication is an inscription intended for particular spectators. For
instance progress report comments or student assignments. An educator should make his
students demonstrate their knowledge through written tests. Written tests are familiar to
students, who undergo a series of standardized tests from primary, secondary, and higher
secondary to university level.
A daily diary is another good way to communicate daily tasks with students. It is a
dialogue between a student and a teacher. It doesn't only have to be about the learning
process but can be about almost anything that the learner would like to know or discuss. The
most important thing is that it is real communication and response to the student in an
'authentic' way within this dialogue. This means that to share genuine thoughts and opinions
with the student rather than simply correcting their grammar and spelling.
Each of these structures influences how communication among teachers and students
tends to occur. Each is itself sort of an implied message about how, when, and with whom
to communicate. Teaching consists of more than interaction among class members. There
are times when teachers prepare lessons or activities, for example, without talking to
students or anyone else. There are also times when they develop their skills as teachers by
reading and reflecting, or by attending professional development seminars or workshops.
When communication is effective, both the student and the teacher benefit. Communication
makes learning easier, helps students achieve goals, increases opportunities for expanded
learning, strengthens the connection between student and teacher, and creates an overall
positive experience.
CHAPTER 3
CONCLUSION
From this paper, it can be concluded that effective communication between teachers
and students is very important in learning. Clear and open communication helps facilitate the
learning process, achieve learning goals, increase broader learning opportunities, strengthen
relationships between students and teachers, and create an overall positive experience.
Teachers can improve their skills through reading, reflection, and attending professional
development seminars. In addition, communication does not only occur through spoken
language but also body language, writing, and daily interactions. Overall, effective
communication between teachers and students is the key to success in the learning process.