Data Transmission with Security Enhanced
Algorithms for 4G/5G Networks
Vikas Kaul, S K Narayankhedkar
mvjvikas@gmail.com,skniitb@yahoo.co.in
Abstract: The core idea behind Next Generation
Networks (NGN) is to encase all information on the
Internet in packets and convey it all in one framework.
Security algorithms have become sensitive to many
types of cryptanalytic assaults, and the Substitution box
(S-box) is the most significant component of symmetric
cryptosystems since it improves cryptography security
by providing non-linearity. This research presents a
performance evaluation of TLS-based information
transport systems.
AES-based encryption is developed, in which the static
S-box is made user key dependent and hence dynamic.
For 4G simulation, an AWGN channel with BPSK is
employed. Using RC4 and key scheduling, the static S-
box in AES is made both dynamic and random. For 4G
simulation, an AWGN channel with QPSK is employed.
In the encryption technologies outlined above, SHA is
utilised for integrity, RSA is used for key exchange, and
AES is employed in the Round structure to increase the
system's complexity.
The following metrics are used to assess
performance: Avalanche Effect, Throughput, CPU
Usage, Encryption and Decryption Time. The results
reveal that the performance is comparable to that of
classic AES. The highest variance is roughly 4%, with a
maximum speed of around 4Mbps, and strict avalanche
conditions are met. In comparison, AES with dynamic
S-box is faster, while AES with dynamic and random S-
box has less variance, thus performance is comparable
to traditional AES. The number of rounds can be varied
depending on the application and network type, and we
can increase speed by using advanced setup. Combining
two or more encryption techniques can improve the
security of the system.
I INTRODUCTION
Mobile communication has progressed at a breakneck
pace in recent decades. The second generation, which
is based on digital technology, supported text
messaging. In the 1999-2000s, 2.5G networks
debuted, bringing the internet into personal
communication. With applications in wireless phone
telephony, mobile internet access, fixed wireless
internet access, video calls, and mobile TV, 3G was
introduced in the 2000s and could give a better data
rate and broader bandwidth.TCP/IP is used
exclusively in 4G, the next-generation mobile
telecommunication system designed for greater
security and reliability. This distinguishes 4G
wireless technologies from 3G and previous versions.
The standardisation of the Long-Term Evolution
(LTE) protocol to become compatible with the 3rd
Generation Partnership Project(3GPP) is the result of
the recent expansion of wireless network technologies
such as mobile TV, Web 2.0, and streaming video.
[1][2]. The architecture of 5G is TCP/IP based, thus,
it enables the radio network to use the same nanocore
for all its usage throughout the network
LTE (Long Term Evolution) technology arose to
overcome many of the issues that plagued previous
network technology in order to improve mobile
communication services and security. Although 3G
security criteria for the LTE protocol have already
been published, extensive research conducted by
ETSI specialists for the 4G standard of LTE/SAE
indicates the key problem in 4G in its usage of end-
to-end security, encryption when data is
communicated across the wired network. As a result,
end-to-end encryption via SSL/TLS, SSH, a VPN, or
a similar technique is necessary. [2].
In the development of successful communication,
data security is a major challenge. To address this
problem, an effective cryptographic system is used to
assure integrity, privacy, availability, authentication,
computability, identification, and accuracy. The
cypher suites used in 3GPP UMTS systems, including
Kasumi, a block cypher, and SNOW 3G and ZUC,
are utilised in the 4G-LTE standard, but Kasumi is
replaced by AES. Because of its high efficiency,
simplicity, and high security, AES is one of the most
widely used encryption systems. For encryptions,
AES is the current NIST approved standard. [2][3].
Despite the fact that AES is the current NIST
recommended standard for symmetrical based
encryptions, concerns have been expressed about
possible attacks. [4][5].
Access network security and core network security
are the two primary areas of security in a 4G system.
In the field of access network security, a lot of work
has been done. However, there is still a lot of work to
be done in the area of core network security. [6].
AES encryption provides data privacy over the
Internet and is utilised in SSL and TLS for actual data
transmission. Many security-conscious companies
mandate that all communications be encrypted with
AES-256. [7].
In the Wireless 4G LTE network, the 128-bit AES
algorithm is favoured, followed by SNOW3G,b
because AES has been subjected to greater public
examination than other encryption solutions. [8].An
enhancement in AES is required to use it within the
newer networks [9]. Round structured and enhanced
AES as an encryption algorithm in TLS increases the
complexity of algorithm and hence increases the
security of data. Also, a change in its key generation Security Requirements for 4G
process is required to make it more secure [10]. To 1. ME (Mobile Equipment)/USIM (Universal
bring nonlinearity to cryptosystem and strengthen Subscriber Identity Module)
cryptographic security, encryption process also needs requirements[2]:
to be dynamic. The dynamic S-box generation
increases cryptographic strength of AES algorithm  Integrity Protection
and use of RC4 for dynamic s-box generation makes it  Data control access
random.[11].
 Confidentiality and integrity of data
stored in the ME/USIM or
II. EVOLUTION OF GENERATIONS OF
transported on the interface
NETWORKS
 User identity privacy retention to
The evolution of modern public wireless networks ME.
can be divided into four generations, each of which is
2. Radio interface and network operator-
defined by a set of important technological
requirements:
advancements. [8].
The theoretical and typical upstream and downstream  Entity authentication: To provide
data rates provided by 2G, 3G, and 4G cellular safe service access and provision,
technologies are presented in the table Table 1 mutual authentication between the
user and the network must be
Table 1 Comparison of 2G/3G/4G Cellular Data implemented.
Services  On wired or wireless interfaces,
provide data secrecy, including user
Theoretical Typical traffic and signalling data.
Maximum Transmission
Fam Technol
Rate Rate  Ensure the integrity of user traffic,
ily ogy signalling data, and control data, as
Downl Uplo Downl Uplo
oad ad oad ad well as their origin authentication.

153.6
153.
50-70
50-  User identity secrecy, user location
1xRTT 6 70 confidentiality, and user
Kbps Kbps
Kbps Kbps untraceability are all protected.
300- 50-
EVDO 2.458 153  Lawful interception: Law
C 500 70
Rev 0 Mbps Kbps enforcement agencies will be able
D Kbps Kbps
to monitor and intercept all calls in
M 300
1.8 450 – compliance with national
A EVDO 3.072 – legislation.
Mbp 800
Rev A Mbps 400
s Kbps 3. Security visibility, configurability and
Kbps
5.4 scalability:
EVDO 14.475
Rev B Mbps
Mbp N/A N/A  Security aspects of the visited
s network are transparent to the user.
20-
114 114 20-40  When a user roams outside of HE,
GPRS 40
Kbps Kbps Kbps they must be able to negotiate an
Kbps
appropriate security lever with the
100- 100-
474 474 visited network (home
EDGE 120 120
Kbps Kbps environment)
Kbps Kbps
G 2.30  The security mechanism's
200- scalability to support a rise in the
S W- 2.688 4 100
250 number of users and/or network
M CDMA Mbps Mbp Kbps
Kbps elements.
s
800- 260-
14.4 384
HSDPA 900 280 Minimum Cryptography Recommendations
Mbps Kbps
Kbps Kbps Table 2 lists recommended algorithms that satisfy
5.7 minimum security requirements for technology [38].
14.4
HSUPA Mbp N/A N/A
Mbps
s
2–5 2–5
5–12 5–12
LTE - Mbp Mbp
Mbps Mbps
s s
 Table 2 Cryptography Recommendations

Operation Recommended
Minimum Security
Algorithms Table 3 explains each available cryptographic
Encryption AES-128-CBC mode
algorithm, the operations it supports. From the table
Public-key RSA-2048 we can conclude that AES is the alternative for most
encryption of the available algorithms.
Authentication RSA-2048, DSA-2048

Integrity SHA-256

Key exchange DH group 14 (2048-bit)

Table 3 Available cryptographic algorithm

Algorithm Operation Status Alternative Mitigation

DES Encryption Avoid AES —

3DES Encryption Legacy AES Short key lifetime

RC4 Encryption Legacy AES Key schedule is important

AES-CBC mode Encryption Acceptable AES-GCM —

AES-GCM mode Authenticated NGE1 — —
encryption

DH-768, -1024 Key exchange Avoid DH-2048 (Group 14) —

RSA-768, -1024 Encryption RSA-2048 —
DSA-768, -1024 Authentication DSA-2048 —

DH-2048 Key exchange Acceptable ECDH-256 —

RSA-2048 Encryption — —
DSA-2048 Authentication ECDSA-256 —

MD5 Integrity Avoid SHA-256 —

SHA-1 Integrity Legacy SHA-256 —

SHA-256 Integrity NGE SHA-384 —

SHA-384
SHA-512
Algorithms marked as Avoid do not provide a
sufficient level of protection against modern attacks
and should not be utilised to protect sensitive data.
These algorithms should be replaced with more
powerful algorithms.
Simulation of 4G
Every communication system requires a channel
simulation to evaluate its performance as well as to
improve or optimise it by modifying the system's
parameters. As a result, in order for the simulator to
be useful, the channel simulation must be as accurate
as possible. [18].
Using an AWGN channel with a QPSK/BPSK
modulator and demodulator is one of the better ways
to use a channel.
— —
— —
III LITERATURE REVIEW
Shannon C E. began work in the realm of secret
communication in 1949, which was published in Bell
Systems Technical Journal as Communication Theory
of Secrecy Systems. Many algorithms had been made
after that like stream cipher, block cipher, Vigenere
cipher etc. The whole literature review is focused on
an array of scholars and researchers from the field of
data security.
Survey of AES with increased key space
In 2006 [1], Qing Xiuhua, Cheng Chuanhui, Wang Li
-on the basis of network structure, core network
mobile terminal, and core technology, showed a
comparison between 3G and 4G. This study also
included various fundamental strategies, such as 4G
security strategy, 4G hybrid networks, and adaptive
4G networks.. Anastasios N. Bikos and Nicolas
Sklavos focused in [2] on the potential security
vulnerabilities that can arise when the Long-Term authentication, SHA is employed. AWGN channel is
Evolution/System Architecture Evolution protocol utilised to generate a 4G simulation scenario.
(LTE/SAE) is deployed in developing 4G wireless
technologies.. [3] addresses the usage of 128-bit
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and SNOW3G
algorithms for integrity protection in the Wireless 4G
LTE network, with 128-bit AES being the most
favoured option. M.B. Vishnu and S.K. Tiong
evaluated probable attacks on the AES algorithm in
[9], 2008. The AES-DES hybrid structure was
designed to address the AES algorithm's flaws. They
employed the AES and DES Fiestel structures. The
original AES encryption method [10] took differential
and linear attacks into account, but the key space was
limited. This study proposes a solution for double-key
encryption based on chaos. Not only is the key space
being increased, but the scrambling to plaintext is
also being done. G N Krishnamurthy and V
Ramaswamy made the S-box key dependant without
modifying its value or the inverse S-box in [22]. In
2012, Razi Hosseinkhani and H. Haj Seyyed Javadi
created Dynamic S-Box in AES Cipher System (a)
employing cypher key [27]. To improve the
cryptographic strength of the AES cypher system,
they convert a static S-box to a dynamic one. They
discussed the procedure of dynamically producing S-
Box from a cypher key and then analysing the
outcomes and tests in [24]. K. Kazlauskas and J.
Kazlauskas developed a new method for randomly
generating AES key-dependent S-boxes and inverse
S-boxes in [29It creates more secure block cyphers
and overcomes the fixed structure S-box problem.
Abd-ElGhafar, A. Rohiem, A. Diaa, and F.
Mohammed proposed a new approach for generating
cryptographically strong variable S-box dependent
keys in [30]. To make S-boxes more dynamic and key
dependant, the RC4 stream cypher is employed to
construct S-boxes for AES (Advanced encryption
Standard). By altering the S-box, Vikas Kaul, Prerna
Chauthari, and S.K Narayankhedkar improved AES
in [34]. The encryption key is used to make the static
S-box dynamic. The inverse S-box was also changed
as a result. AES is utilised in a circular structure to
increase the system's complexity. To generate a 4G
simulation scenario, BPSK modulation and
demodulation are combined with an AWGN channel.
There are comparisons made between the AES and
the upgraded system. Runtime and throughput are (b)
used to evaluate performance.

IV METHODOLOGY

AES is employed to solve the shortcomings of

existing 3G/4G cypher algorithms, with the goal of Fig.1 (a) Structure of the overall system (b) AES in
increasing complexity. By employing chaos, the shift round structure
row number in each round is made key dependent,
after which the S-box and inverse S-box are made
user key dependent, and finally the S-box is generated
using RC-4 and made random. AES is embedded in a
circular structure that employs 256-bit input data and
the Fiestal Network to add to the complexity. For key
exchange, RSA is utilised, and for message
 V Results

I) Model 1. AES with Dynamic S-box Generation

Fig. 2 AES with dynamic key dependent S-box

Fig. 3 AES in Round structure with dynamic key

dependent S-box

Results and Discussion

Table 5-1 Performance Parameters

Performance The computer
Data type
evaluation based on Algorithm configurations
Files
parameters
Runtime AES Microsoft Windows
Throughput AES with Round structure (1 / 2 /5 /10 rounds), 7, Intel i5 CPU
Text 3210M @ 2.50 GHz,
CPU Usage AES using dynamic key dependent S-box and
Image 4 GB RAM and
AES within Round structure using dynamic S-
Memory Usage box (1 / 2 /5 /10 rounds) MATLAB 2013a.
The following sections explain the results based on various parameters given.

i) AES in Round Structure with dynamic key dependent S-box

Based on Run Time and Throughput

File: “plaintext.txt” Size: 82 bytes (656 bits), Key: “feistel aes key enhanced aes key”
Channel: AWGN (1.no noise, 2.noise 7.5db), with noise (7.5 db) : Integrity rejection

Table 5-2 AES algorithm and its variants based on Run time and throughput (text file)
Sr. Block No of Time Throughput
Algorithm
No size blocks encryption decryption encryption decryption
1 AES 128 6 0.0024116 0.0029766 272.018 220.385
2 AES dynamic S-box 128 6 0.002466 0.0021623 266.017 303.38
3 Round struct (1 R) 256 3 0.0025691 0.004497 255.342 145.875
4 Round struct with dyn S-box (1 R) 256 3 0.0033981 0.005759 193.049 113.908
5 Round struct (5 R) 256 3 0.0058878 0.00677 111.416 97.113

6 Round struct with dyn S-box (5R ) 256 3 0.007983 0.009715 82.174 67.524

7 Round struct (10 R) 256 3 0.0077133 0.009856 85.047 66.558

Round struct with dyn S-box (10
8 256 3 0.0136177 0.014793 48.172 44.345
R)
 (a) (b)
Fig. 4 Graph for the comparison of AES algorithm and its variants based on (a) runtime and (b) throughput for text
file

ii) AES in Round Structure with dynamic key dependent S-box

Results Analysis Based on CPU and Memory Usage

File: “plaintext.txt”, Size: 82 bytes (656 bits), Key: “feistel aes key enhanced aes key”
Channel: AWGN (1.no noise, 2noise 7.5 db), with noise (7.5 db): Integrity rejection

Table 5-3 The AES algorithm, as well as various variations based on CPU and memory usage (text file)
Sr. CPU usage (in %) Memory (Bytes)
Algorithm
no. Encryption Decryption Encryption Decryption
1 AES 7.5 11 409.7 409.1
2 AES dynamic S-box 13 7 429.7 429.45
3 Round struct (1 R) 13 12.5 373.3 373.32
Round struct with dyn S-box
4 8.5 12 409.6 409.5
(1 R)
5 Round struct (5 R) 7.5 12 349.6 358.55
Round struct with dyn S-box
6 11 8 402.75 405.5
(5R )
7 Round struct (10 R) 9.5 6.25 341.9 355.2
Round struct with dyn S-box
8 12 7 420.1 420.35
(10 R)

(a) (b)

Fig. 5 Graph for the comparison of AES algorithm, as well as various variations based on (a) CPU usage and (b)
memory usage for Text file
 iii) AES In Round Structure with dynamic key dependent S-box

Results Analysis Based on Avalanche Effect

Table 5-4 Avalanche effect for 256 bits

Sr. Block Avalanche Effect (bits)
no Algorithm (for 256 bits input) Size
1 bit change in PT 1 bit change in key
1 AES 128 66 135
2 AES with dynamic S-box 128 68 135
3 AES in Round structure (1 Round) 256 134 139
AES in Round structure with dynamic S- 256
4 63 60
box (1 round)
5 AES in Round structure (5 Rounds) 256 122 120
AES in Round structure with dynamic S- 256
6 123 142
box (5 rounds)
7 AES in Round structure (10 Rounds) 256 132 129
AES in Round structure with dynamic S- 256
8 104 142
box (10 rounds)

II) Model 2 AES Algorithm with Dynamic, Random S-Box and RC4

Fig. 6 AES with Dynamic Radom S-box and RC4 Fig. 7 AES in Round structure with Dynamic Radom
S-box and RC4
 Results and Discussion

Table 5-5 Performance Parameters

Performance parameters Algorithms System Configuration
AES
Throughput AES using dynamic Microsoft Windows 8 Intel i3,
Radom S-box and RC4, 6 GB RAM
Encryption time
AES with Round
structure (1/5/10)
AES within round Microsoft Windows 10 Intel
Decryption time structure using dynamic i7, 16 GB RAM.
Radom S-box and RC4
(1/5/10)

The AES algorithm, as well as various variations in round structure with Dynamic Radom S-Box and RC4
based on Run Time and Throughput
1. For text file:
a) File: “plaintext.txt” Size: 144 bytes (1552 bits) Key: 12345678901234561234567890123456
The computer configurations: Microsoft Windows 8, Intel i3, 64 bit, 6 GB RAM

Table 5-6 AES algorithm, as well as various variations based on Run time and throughput (text file)

Bloc Throughput
Sr. No of encryption decryption
Algorithm k decrypt
No blocks time time encryption
size ion
1 AES 128 12 0.02887 0.033899 53.758 45.783
2 Enhanced AES 128 12 0.02951 0.0354 52.592 43.871
3 Round Struct(1R) 256 6 0.0167 0.01784. 92.934 86.995
Round structure
4 with Enhanced 256 6 0.017225 0.01901 90.101 81.641
AES(1R)
5 Round Struct(5R) 256 6 0.066 0.07916 23.515 19.605
Round structure
6 with Enhanced AES 256 6 0.075342 0.08786 20.599 17.664
(5R)
7 Rround Struct(10R) 256 6 0.1376 0.1662 11.279 9.38
Round structure
8 with Enhanced AES 256 6 0.13405 0.1656 11.577 9.371
(10R)

Table 5-6 shows that (1) Traditional AES is 2.0% faster than enhanced AES. (2) AES round structure is (1R) 42% faster
than traditional AES. (3) Enhanced round structure (1R) is 40.34% faster than traditional AES.

a. File: “plaintext.txt” Size: 144 bytes (1552 bits) Key: 12345678901234561234567890123456

The computer configurations: Microsoft Windows 10, Intel i7, 64 bit, 16 GB RAM
 Table 5-7 AES algorithm, as well as various variations based on Run time and throughput (text file)

Sr Throughput
. Block No of encryption decryption
Algorithm
N size blocks time time
encryption decryption
o
1 AES 128 12 0.013449 0.015884 115.39891 97.708385

2 Enhanced AES 128 12 0.01361 0.0162 114.03379 95.802469

3 Round Struct(1R) 256 6 0.008056 0.00948 192.65143 163.71308

Round structure
4 with Enhanced 256 6 0.0082443 0.0094662 188.25127 163.95174
AES(1R)
5 Round Struct(5R) 256 6 0.031537 0.03821 49.212036 40.617639
Round structure
6 with Enhanced 256 6 0.0313 0.038351 49.584664 40.468305
AES (5R)
Rround
7 256 6 0.060397 0.072835 25.69664 21.308436
Struct(10R)
Round structure
8 with Enhanced 256 6 0.063489 0.072627 24.445179 21.369463
AES (10R)

Table 5-7 shows the comparison of AES algorithm, as well as various variations based on throughput and runtime, It
concludes that (1) Traditional AES is 1.1% faster than enhanced AES. (2) AES round structure (1R) is 41% faster
than traditional AES. (3) Enhanced round structure (1R) is 38.70% faster than traditional AES.

(a)

(a)

(b)
Fig. 8 The x-axis is the number of the algorithm,
the y-axis is the runtime in seconds given in figure 11 (a),
and the throughput in kb/sec is indicated in figure 11 (b).
Graph comparing the AES method and its variants for
text files on i3 based on (a) runtime and (b) throughput.
Because there is little difference in the runtime
(b)
and throughput of AES and extended AES algorithms
Fig. 9 Graph for the comparison of AES algorithm
in the figure, AES can be substituted with enhanced AES.
and its various variations based on (a) runtime and (b)
 throughput for text file on i7. Figure 9 (a) and (b)
show that there is not much variation in the runtime
and throughput of AES and enhanced AES algorithm
hence AES can be substituted with enhanced AES.
VI CONCLUSION
Various models for performance evaluation of
specified symmetric encryption algorithms are
established in this work. Making the S-box dynamic
in the first technique creates further confusion, while
the Round structure adds to the system's complexity.
Traditional AES is enhanced in the second way by
making S-box creation dynamic and random using
RC4, and enhanced AES is also employed in a round
structure. The following metrics were used to assess
performance: Avalanche Effect, Throughput, CPU
Usage, Encryption and Decryption Time.
Performance is kept close to typical AES, according
to the evaluation.
The results obtained for AES with dynamic S-BOX
are more ideal, and round structure with Dynamic S
box appears to be faster, according to a comparison of
several approaches. High data transmission rates are
required for 3G and 4G, and the system encrypts the
data in a reasonable amount of time. The greatest data
rate reported is roughly 4 Mbps, which is LTE
network compatible. However, the system must still
reach a data rate that is consistent with 4G networks.
Comparative analysis of running the application on
various configurations show that:
 There is 116% increase in Speed when the
application is run on an i-7 instead of i-3
machine.
 As maximum speed obtained in model 3 is
around 2 Mbps, by the use of advance
configuration we can achieve up to 5.32
Mbps.
1.1 Future Scope
With the addition of more improvements, the research
work can be extended.
 One improvement is that it can use chaos
and dynamic S-box generation at the same
time.
 Another way to improve security is to
combine AES with other existing algorithms
such as ECC.
 The system can also be tweaked and run on
high-end setups for increased speed and
security in next-generation 4G and 5G
networks.
 The programming language used in the
application can have a big impact on how
quickly it runs.
More research is needed to see how dynamic S-box
affects AES security. Performance indexes are used
to assist in assessing the cryptanalysis of the created
S-box so that it may be assessed for security upgrade.
5G as a future technology
The architecture of 5G is TCP/IP based, thus, it
enables the radio network to use the same nanocore
for all its usage throughout the network. It will
identify the devices operating within its range using
certain specified pre-defined symbols. Normal IP
addressing which is generally used is avoided which
is one of the benefits. The added element in network
architecture is that of 5G nanocore. It uses
nanotechnology and cloud computing. The
architecture is entirely IP based as in the case of 4G
systems. It will include both the internet resources as
well as centralized servers at the same time. Thus,
subscribers can use their application and their files
without any requirement of installation of any other
software. It will provide such a large capacity that
many users can accommodated at the same time. It is
mainly developed for IPv6 as the IP addresses are
getting depleted. It was each machine has its own
unique IPAddress.5G operations will has more larger
capacity due to which more users can be
accommodated
CURRENT STATUS OF 5G.
 Telecom companies such as Nokia,
Ericsson, Alcatel-Lucent , NTT DoCoMo,
NEC, Samsung , Huawei and Fujitsu are
driving bulk of the 5G-related innovations.
References:
[1] Qing Xiuhua, Cheng Chuanhui, Wang Li, “A Study of
Some Key Technologies of 4G System,” 3rd IEEE
Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications
2008. pp-2292-2295
[2] A.N. Bikos, N. Sklavos, “LTE/SAE Security Issues on
4G Wireless Networks,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol.
11, no.2, pp 55-62, 2013.
[3] Xinxin Fan, Gaung Gong, “Specification of the stream
cipher WG-16 based confidentiality and integrity
algorithm”, http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca
[4] S. Murphy, M. B. Robshaw, "Essential Algebraic
Structure within the AES," Advances in Cryptology
CRYPTO 2002, Lecture Notes Computer Science,
Springer-Verlag, Vol. 2442, pp 322-342, 2002.
[5] H. Nover, “Algebraic Cryptanalysis of AES:
Overview,” University of Wisconsin, USA, 2005,
http://www.math.wisc.edu/~boston/nover.pdf
[6] Y. Zheng, D. He, X. Tang, H. Wang, “AKA and
Authorization Scheme For 4G Mobile Networks Based
on Trusted Mobile Platform,” IEEE International
Conference on Information & Communication Systems,
vol.1, pp 976-979, 2005.
[7] Erik Kangas “256-bit AES Encryption for SSL and
TLS: Maximal Security” http://luxsci.com
[8] The Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Network: Transforming
Business with Next-Generation Technology, Verizon
Wireless, http://business.verizonwireless.com
[9] M.B. Vishnu, S.K. Tiong, M. Zaini, S.P. Koh,
“Security Enhancement of Digital Motion Image
Transmission Using Hybrid AES-DES Algorithm,”
Proceedings of 14th Asia-Pacific Conference on
Communications 2008 IEICE 08 SB 0083.
[10] Y. Kun, Z. Han, L. Zhaohui., “An Improved AES
algorithm based on chaos”, International Conference on
 Multimedia Information Networking and Security, vol.2
pp. 326-329,2009.
[11] Julia Juremi, Ramlan Mahmod, Salasiah Sulaiman, “A
Proposal for Improving AES S-box with Rotation and
Key-dependent”, Proceedings of International
Conference on Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare and
Digital Forensic (CyberSec), pp.38-42 2012
[12] G. Alvarez and S. Li, “Some Basic Cryptographic
Requirements for Chaos-Based Cryptosystems,”
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 16,
no. 8, pp. 2129-2151, 2006.
[13] M. Bogdanoski, P. Latkoski, A. Risteski, B. Popovski
“IEEE 802.16 Security Issues: A Survey,” 16th
Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR), pp. 199-
202,2008.
[14] Dr. E. Ramaraj, S. Karthikeyan and M. Hemalatha, “A
Design of Security Protocol using Hybrid Encryption
Technique (AES- Rijndael and RSA),” International
Journal of The Computer, the Internet and Management,
vol. 17, no.1,pp 345-350, 2009.
[15] Xiang Li, Junli Chen, Dinghu Qin, Wanggen Wan,
“Research and Realization based on hybrid encryption
algorithm of improved AES and ECC,” IEEE
International Conference on Audio Language and Image
Processing (ICALIP), pp. 396-400, 2010.
[16] J. Blackledge, N. Ptitsyn, “Encryption using
Deterministic Chaos,” ISAST Transactions on
Electronics and Signal Processing, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 6-
17. 2010.
[17] B. Bakhache, “A New Chaotic Encryption Algorithm
to Enhance the Security of ZigBee and Wi-Fi
networks,” International Journal of Intelligent
Computing Research (IJICR), Volume 2, Issues
4,pp.361-366, 2011.
[18] O. Prasanthi, M. Subba Reddy, “Enhanced AES
Algorithm,” International Journal of Computer
Applications in Engineering Sciences, vol.2, no.2, pp.
114-116 , 2012.
[19] T. Xiao-Jun, W. Zhu, and Z. Ke,“ A novel block
encryption scheme based on chaos and an S-box for
wireless sensor networks,” Chinese Physics. B , vol. 21,
no. 2, pp. 287-290 , 2012.
[20] G. Makris , I. Antoniou , “Cryptography with Chaos,”
5th Chaotic Modelling and Simulation, International
Conference, vol.10, no.1, pp.309-316, 2012.
[21] C. Pradhan, A. Bisoi, “Chaotic Variations of AES
Algorithm,” International Journal of Chaos, Control,
Modelling and Simulation (IJCCMS) vol.2, no.2,pp.
264-267 ,2013.
[22] Krishnamurthy G N, V Ramaswamy,” Making AES
Stronger: AES with Key Dependent S-Box,” IJCSNS
International Journal of Computer Science and Network
Security, vol.8 no.9,pp.388-398, September 2008
[23] Ghada Zaibi, Abdennaceur Kachouri, Fabrice Peyrard,
Daniele Foumier-Prunaret, “On Dynamic chaotic S-
BOX,” IEEE Global Information Infrastructure
Symposium 2009
[24] N. Seddigh, B. Nandy, R. Makkar, J.F. Beaumont,
“Security Advances and Challenges in 4G Wireless
Networks,” IEEE Eighth International Conference on
Privacy, Security and Trust, pp. 62-71, 2010
[25] Yu Zheng, Dake He, Weichi Yu and Xiaohu Tang,
“Trusted Computing-Based Security Architecture For
4G Mobile Networks, ” IEEE Sixth International
Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing
Applications and Technologies (PDCAT'05) 2005
[26] M. Kaleem Iqbal, M. Bilal Iqbal, Iftikhar Rasheed,
Abdullah Sandhu, “4G Evolution and Multiplexing
Techniques with solution to implementation
challenges,” International Conference on Cyber-
Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge
Discover, pp.485-488, 2012.
[27] Razi Hosseinkhani, H. Haj Seyyed Javadi, ”Using
Cipher Key to Generate Dynamic S-Box in AES Cipher
System,” International Journal of Computer Science and
Security (IJCSS), Volume (6): Issue (1):2012, pp.-18-
28, 2102
[28] Shabaan Sahmoud, Wisam Elmasry and Shadi Abdulfa,
“Enhancement the security of AES against modern
attacks by using variable key block cipher,
”International Arab Journal of e-technology, Vol 3,No.
1, pp. 17-26, January 2013
[29] Kazys KAZLAUSKAS, Jaunius KAZLAUSKAS,
“Key-Dependent S-Box Generation in AES Block
Cipher System,” INFORMATICA, 2009, Vol. 20, No.
1, pp.23–34, 2009
[30] I.Abd-ElGhafar, A. Rohiem, A. Diaa, and
F.Mohammed, “Generation of AES dependent S-boxes
using RC4 algorithm,” 13th International Conference on
Aerospace Sciences & Aviation Technology (ASAT-
13), Military Technical College, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 1-9,
2009
[31] Mahmoud E.M., El Hafez, A. Elgarf, Talat. A. Zekry
A., “Dynamic AES-128 with key-dependent S-box,”
International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications, vol. 3, Issue 1, pp.1662-1670, Jan -Feb
2013
[32] S. Shivkumar, G.Umamaheswari, “Performance
comparison of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
and AES key dependent S-box simulation using
MATLAB,” IEEE International Conference on Process
Automation, Control and Computing (PACC), pp. 1–6,
2011
[33] M. Dara, K. Manochehri, “Using RC4 and AES
schedule to generate Dynamic S-box in AES,”
Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective,
vol. 23, pp. 1-9, 2014
[34] V. Kaul, P. Choudhari, S K Narayankhedkar, “Security
Enhancement for Data Transmission In 4G Networks,”
IEEE The Next Generation Information Technology
Summit (Confluence), pp. 373-378, 2014
[35] C.E. Shannon, “Communication Theory of Secrecy
Systems”, Bell Systems Technical Journal, vol. 128,
no.4, pp 656-715, 1949
[36] E. Bianco, “Encryption System Based on Chaos
Theory,” in United State Patent, Patent Number:
5,048,086 , Sep. 10, 1991.
[37] Z. Rui., W. Qingsheng, W. Huiping, “Design of AES
Algorithm Based on Two Dimensional Logistic and
Chebyshev Chaotic Mapping,” 2008.
[38] Cisco Ltd.,” Next Generation Encryption,” Cisco
Security Intelligence Operations”, 2012.
http://www.cisco.com.