Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Management - Session 4
Project Management - Session 4
Project Management - Session 4
Management
Session 4
❑Compliance
❑Operational
❑Strategic
❑A business case explains how the benefits of a project overweigh its costs and why it should be
executed.
❑A business case typically includes the strategic justification for the project, its monetary cost, the
expected benefits, any known or anticipated risks, the expected time of completion, and who will
be responsible for each of the phases of the project.
❑It includes non-monetary factors such as expected behavioural impacts, increase in efficiency,
service improvements, competitiveness effects, etc.
❑Identify the business problem → should be aligned with business goals. To solve specific
business problems or create a business opportunity.
❑Identify the alternative solutions → identify different ways of solving the problem
❑Recommend a preferred solution → rank the solutions on the basis of different criteria
❑The projects can be internal to the organization or external doing something for an external
client.
❑Often the project is initiated with a single comment “if you have a chance, why don’t you look
into…”
❑The immediate result of this bland statement is the creation of a Project to investigate whatever
the boss has suggested.
❑A project that is required in order to protect lives or property or to keep the company in operation
❑Is the system worth saving at the estimated cost of the project?
❑A project that is required in order to maintain the company’s position in the marketplace
❑Examples?
❑Projects are subjectively rank ordered based on their perceived benefit to the company.
❑For example, some projects concern potential new products, some concern changes in
production methods, and others propose to create a daycare center for employees with small
children.
❑Q-sort method
❑Q-sort method
❑Payback period
❑The payback model measures the time it will take to recover the project investment.
❑Some managers use payback model to eliminate unusually risky projects (with lengthy payback)
❑Payback period
❑Project A has an initial investment of $700,000 and a project cash inflow of $225,000 for 5
years
❑Project B has an initial investment of $400,000 and a project cash inflow of $110,000 for 5
years.
❑Payback period
❑This model uses management’s minimum desired rate of return (discount rate) to compute the
present value of all net cash inflows.
❑If the result is positive, it means the project meets the minimum desired rate of return and is
eligible for further consideration.
❑Project A has an initial investment of $700,000 and a project cash inflow of $225,000 for 5
years
❑Project B has an initial investment of $400,000 and a project cash inflow of $110,000 for 5
years.
❑In the NPV model, the discount rate (return on investment (ROI) rate) can differ for different
projects.
❑Limitation – fails to include projects where financial return is impossible to measure or other
factors are vital to the accept or reject decision
❑However, experience shows that most organizations use similar criteria across all types of
projects, with perhaps one or two criteria specific to the type of project
❑Regardless of criteria differences among different types of projects, the most important criterion
is the project’s fit to the organization strategy
❑Hence, this criteria should be consistent across all types of projects and carry high priority.
❑Last two decades have witnessed a dramatic shift to include multiple criteria in project selection.
❑Today, senior managers are interested in identifying the potential mix of projects that will yield
the best use of human and capital resources to maximize return on investment in the long run.
❑Some important factors for project selection – public image, ethical position, new technology,
protection of the environment, core competencies, and strategic fit.
❑Project should come from anyone who believes her project will add value to the organization.
❑If you restrict proposals from specific groups or levels within the organization, then it could be an
opportunity lost.
❑Culling through so many proposals to identify those that add the most value requires a
structured process
❑A senior priority team evaluates each proposal in terms of feasibility, potential contribution to
strategic objectives, and fit within a portfolio of current projects.
❑Given the criteria and portfolio the team rejects or accepts the project.
❑If the project is approved, a project manager and staff are assigned to develop a detailed
implementation plan.
❑Once complete, the proposal with the implementation plan is reviewed a second time
❑Variance between what was estimated in the initial proposal and final estimates based on more
complete research/planning are examined.
❑If there is a significant difference between the initial proposal and the final plan, then the senior
management may not approve the project.
❑Responsibility of prioritising
i = 20%
Investment Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4
Cashflow $ (75,000) $ 20,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 $ 50,000
PVIF 1.0000 1.2000 1.4400 1.7280 2.0736
PV $ $ (75,000) $ 16,667 $ 17,361 $ 17,361 $ 24,113
NPV $ 502
❑Class of clientele
Mall Options
Grade Score
Category Weight 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Class of clientele 1.000 2 3 1 3 2.000 3.000 1.000 3.000
Rent 0.900 3 2 1 3 2.700 1.800 0.900 2.700
Indoor mall 0.855 3 1 3 1 2.565 0.855 2.565 0.855
Traffic volume 0.720 3 2 3 1 2.160 1.440 2.160 0.720
Total Score 9.425 7.095 6.625 7.275