As compared to the previous rules and ethics' procedures, the current form

represents a completely new dimension for the human genetic engineering field
because it deals with the citizens' jury composed of people who are closely
owned by hereditary diseases. The patients don't have to wait no more for the
decisions to be made traditionally by the policymakers or professionals. It is
now them who has their own say, and that only improves the process to be more
inclusive and diverse.

The two perspectives presented in the article are:The two perspectives presented
in the article are:

1. Proponents of human genome editing of embryos say that it may provide the
possibility of treatment for severe diseases through DNA repair and bring relief
or better lives to the genetically affected people and their families. They
underscore the fact that smart genomics is a new age technology, and fair access
to therapy should be provided.

2. Criticisms occur, which discuss the normalcy of changing embryos' genetic

construction at the ethical, moral, and social aspect. You are very welcome to
our artificial intelligence mode that will be writing for you free of charge as
long as you remember to mention the legitimate reference. This will commit us to
systemic changes as we will work towards the betterment of your sentence. They
point out that serving as societal ethics watchdogs, identifying possible harm
and release genetic diseases are things in which ethicists are not allowed to
ignore. On the other hand, decision-makers understand that the referred
operation should be non-consensus and participatory.