PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

PROBLEM FORMULATION RUBRIC

(THE FINAL OUTPUT)
FIRST MASTERY EXAMINATION
(A.Y. 2023-2024)

PROBLEM FORMULATION (component of rubrics – descriptors)

Excellent (30-25 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written expectations;
exemplary performance,
participation, creativity and
writing; fully addresses the
criterion; excellent grasp of
facts, analysis and application;
consistently clear statements and
explanations
Very Good: (24-20 points): Good to fair
work in most aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written expectations
regarding content, writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical
application; clear statements and explanations
are limited, but above average quality
Good: (19-15 points): Passing
work, but in serious need of
improvement in many areas,
especially in regard to form and
content; minimal grasp of facts,
analysis and application; very few
clear statements or explanations
Needs Improvement/Unsatisfactory
(less than 15 points): confusing, lacks
explanation or completion; little
conforming to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content, writing
style or procedures; overall, below
professional quality standards; not
quality work

CRITERIA POINTS DESIGNATED POINTS EARNED

AREA 1: Research Title
Research title shows consistency with the research problem. It clearly
encapsulates the main area of inquiry. Concise, with maximum of twelve 20
words composition with very minimal inclusion of function words.
Experimental variables (independent and dependent), Non-
experimental (predictor and criterion) are reflected. Attention
arresting.
AREA 2: Problem Statement
Clearly states the purpose of the study without inclination to different
interpretation of meaning /The general problem/question/purpose is 30
clearly defined. Reflect the main components of the problem statement
explicitly such that: main task, major variables, subjects or
respondents, setting, coverage date, and intended output.
AREA 3: Specific Sub-problems
Alignment to the general problem is manifested. Each sub-problem
contributes to the elucidation of the problem. Sub-problems represent the 40
different facets of the problem and exploratory in nature. Sub-problems
are in question form and can be empirically validated and arranged
logically. The main purpose/inquiry must be reflected as well in the sub-
problems. Minimum of 3 sub-problems.
AREA 4: HYPOTHESES 20
Articulates clear, reasonable, and succinct research hypotheses, and
questions are fresh, interesting and significant. The concepts employed in
the hypothesis must be measurable.
AREA 5: Grammar/Mechanics/Format
Adheres to the conventions of grammar such as punctuations, diction, S- 10
V agreement, clarity, etc. Technicalities of the output is well-observed.
Output is also submitted in accurate and organized manner.

TOTAL POINTS / 120

Grade/Strand and Section: ______________________ Date Accomplished: ______________

AREA 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 AREA 4 AREA 5

OVER-ALL
FEEDBACK:

Checked and Evaluated by:

MARITESS T. KHO MAT-ENG

Practical Research 2 Instructor
 PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

INDIVIDUAL RATING/ASSESSMENT
(A.Y. 2023-2024)

As the expected output for the course subject PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE) will be done in
collaborative manner, it is expected that every members of the group will do its responsibility and must adhere to the
essence of teamwork. To maintain the group harmony and to make sure that points are fairly distributed or given, all
group research leaders are expected to give a rating to their members’ active involvement level.

The rating will range from 0 to 10. Evaluate your groupmates objectively. Make sure additional comments were
provided.
DESIGNATED POINTS DESCRIPTION
0 The group member did not help at all.
1-4 The group member’s involvement is less satisfactory. He is usually absent in the group
meeting/ synchronous sessions. He is also absent-minded and is passive with only a very
little contribution in the accomplishment of the activity or areas.
5-7 The group member’s involvement is very satisfactory.
8 - 10 The group member excellently contributed so much in the accomplishment of the activity.

RESEARCH PROBLEM FORMULATION (1ST MASTERY PERIOD)

GRADE/STRAND & SECTION: ______________________ DATE ACCOMPLISHED: ___________________

NAMES EXPECTED EXHIBITED ATTRIBUTES ( rate based on the points designation above)
Participated in Helped keep the Contributed Has made his Quality of Additional
GROUP group discussions group on task. useful ideas contributions for completed work Comments
Demonstrate a the task. Found & observes
NAME: cooperative and useful & timeliness
supportive appropriate
____________ attitude. materials for the
task.
(EXAMPLE. -sometimes he
DELA CRUZ, joined class
JUAN) 7 8 8 10 8 discussion
late;
incomplete
(remove this submission
sample  ) based on
individual task

EVALUATED BY:

________________________________
SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME OF THE RESEARCH LEADER