Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abbasid Caliphate
Abbasid Caliphate
tightened hishold
o v e r the
was built up.
This netüwork of spies kept
He
efficient system
of espionage affairs the empire w e r e
of LWEZIR
bureaucracy. An trouble. The financial to become
potential soon
track of all sources of
was
aide. This office
the supervision of one trusted minister.
AFEHILS
organized under the all powerfuf
in the form of the Wazir,
permancnt
a s of fiscal arrangements, the policy of Hallaj of heavy investments in Iraq was d
afinued. Commerce was crucial to state income. Trade was eneouraged by the sheer waut60y
4ntint
oanse of the empire. The state policies were also geared towards encouraging trade. qh Sh
ghdad was chosen as the not only because it controlled Iraq but s'so because it
capital -
es situated on major land and river (through the Tigris and the Eupharates)traderoutes
faghdad was different from the early lslamic cities in that it wasnct organized on tribal leréknrs
asis. It soon became the cultural and economic centre of the caliphate.
away and an independent Umayyad caliphate
was
uring his reign Spain broke him
stablished there. Al Mansur was succeeded by his son al Mahdi (775-785). Under
and there was an attempt at Lirn9/-
he fiuancial organization. of the state was improved with the more moderate M4wIChHE
(econciling the Shia opposition to the Abbasids by making peace
With its populist ideology Apain?
omong them. He faced
another threat from Manichaeism.
the exact nature and extent of ASS1mugnu
which detachment from mundane worldly affairs,
preached Persian huey
¢his movement is not ciear. ît definitely involved an attempt to keep alive the
of the assimilative policy beingadvocated by therulers. The
cultural traditions in the face rid of many
and al Mahdi used this to get
ulama pressed for their suppression there was a Umayyad revolt in Egypt
troublesome elements. Towards the end of his reign of al Hadi (785-786)
Shia revolt in Arabia. Both were The next reign, that
crushed.
His was a period hAo
7
*7
and a
(786-809).
succeeded by his brother Harh al Rashid the Rk
was brief. He was was largely left in
because of the
Baghdad became a major Economic deveiopment
was accelerated
abandoned as the capital.
economic growth led,
in its turn, to a further
absolutist state. This
deve.opment of the
absolutism of the state.
within the empire.
established
had a number/
ms
comparative peace
of the The empire
flourished because with safety. wealth of the aC7
Commerce
could carry
merchandise ot high valueprospered. The increasing and large
S
FLoURISAm
Merchants Market grew anc government
officials
and flourishing ports. family, local PTs
poor drainage.
The decreasing revenue of the empire was complimented by the increasing expenditure of fE
the state caused by the spread of factional fighting and the constant pampering of slave
the shortage of income increased corruption
troups. The weakening central control due to
the state further. Al Wasiqwho was at the mercy of
among the officers which weakened tried
his slave troops who were becoming increasingly conscious of their indispensability,
to introduce other ethnic elements into this body. He thus started factions in a body
within the slave
whose main advantage had been their cohesiveness. Factional groups
and the Caliphs increasingly becanme pawns in their
corps started competing for power
struggle for power.
as his successors, he
When Mutawakkil(847-861) désignated his three young sons
divided up the empire and sent them off to their respective provinces. The commander of
the amies and the administrators accompanying them were allowed to deduct military
The commanders were
expenditure before sending the balance to the central treasury
also given iqtas (revenue grants) within these provinces. Until now iqtas had only been
given to royal relatives for civil functions. This was to grow into a major institution under
the militarized state that emerged from the wreckage of the Abbasid empire
troubles brewing within the
Thetenth century, as we have indicated earlier, saw serious
economy of the empire. The luxurious lifestyles of the governing classes, increasing
corruption among. the administrators_and the decline of agriculture led to serious
economic crisis. Peasants revolted against landlords and authority. The increasing
number of Turkish slave soldiers who tended to become insubordinate added to the
problems. The central authority finding itself incapable of maintaining order surrendered
power to the Turkish generals. Earlier the Caliphs had tried every means to of raising
cash for their military necds like tax-farming, auctioning of offices, sale of crown lands
and confiscation of property. By the time of Caliph Mamun the military branch of the
empire had come to dominate complctely over the civil and the money that came from
the tax farms was insufficient to pay the army. So the practice of giving the military the
outcome of two previous
to collect taxes was resorted to. This new iqta was the
right The latter
institutions: the tax farm and the amirate or the prov1ncial government.
basis of strict separation of the military and
institution had worked till now on the
financial arms of government, through
the offices of the amir and the anmil. By 892 the
was the only way in which the previnces
central treasury was empty and the military iqta
trade because caravans were
could be govciiucd. Decliiñg law and order also threatened
were instructed to protect trade and soon
often targets of attack. The military governors
trade. Once a military govermor
the military includd in its taxes from the inter-regional
was the
assigned right to collect taxes from a large area, it was very easy for him to
become independent.
series of disturbances which the
Decline of the central authority was reflected in the
caliphs had great difficulty in quelling. The new movements against ancaliph:
the tended to
effective local
be conceñtrated in territorial blocks. The populations preferred
the Aghlabids had
governor to an ineffective and distant caliph. In the ninth century
the Fatimids. The Tulunids
becomeindependent in Tunisia.In 909 they were replaced by mUS7
second half of the tenth
and khshidid had ruled successfully over Egypt but in the
established their
century the Fatimids gained control of Egypt. In 897 the Zaydi Shias had Mosul.
independent rule in. the Yemen. In 905 the Hamdanids became independent in
The Samanids came to control north east Iran. Finally in 945 the Buyids who had S L i