Biblical texts on creation coupled with marriage are important
for gaining a biblical perspective. Genesis Two provides material from which we can draw some conclusions that are helpful in gaining insights into both males and females and the institution of marriage. Chapter Two of Genesis speaks of the creation of Adam and Eve. Adam is formed from the ground whereas Eve is formed from Adam. Eve was made from a bone that was removed from Adam and indications are that it was a rib. Adam exclaims she is bone of my bone. God performed surgery on Adam including anaesthetising him and immediately healing his post-operative incisions and excisions. Moses inserts a comment about people leaving their parents to be joined in marriage based on the bond that exists between a male and a female which is derivative. This is why the compatibility of male and female is so strong because females originate from males. Although the bond between parent and child is so strong as children owe their origin to their parents, yet the principles of biblical anthropology express a far stronger bond between a married couple. What of secular concepts of evolution, genetics and the consequential ethics that derive from science? Can biblical anthropology lay the foundation for an alternative to secular science? The answer is no! Trying to link or find points of validation in science for scripture is an inappropriate endeavour as scripture is true and literal but it is not a scientific textbook and never should be distorted to accommodate science. The reverse is true. Why reject science or distort scientific evidence to accommodate scripture? Our confidence in scripture is based on faith and not reason; faith a product of the new birth of a new creation and a grace or faculty that does not operate on scientific principles. We must therefore always guard against this temptation and rather operate from the basis that the bible is both true and literal. Having set aside this bone of contention, it is interesting to home in on and concentrate on one particular point raised in this process. It is the assertion of Moses that a person leaves his parents to marry a woman, the whole basis being that a woman is biologically derived from a man and therefore has the closest affinity to a man. Some teachers claim that a man can see a woman as a mirror image of himself. This has a truthful aspect. Yet something unique was created from Adam to form a person who was derived from man to demonstrate female dignity – she was created from a person and not the ground - but also to compensate for his lack of a suitable person to commune with. Therefore, God created a woman from him, unique yet compatible. Moses’ added comment illustrates a certain teleological aspect to human creation. Men were to leave their parents – a mother and a father indicating equal dignity for both genders in a family unit – and join with another woman to create a family of his own. This expectation does not mandate marriage for all men and women – perhaps leaving one’s home might be for many reasons nor does it preclude celibacy or the single life. It is a generalized expectation of males and females duplicating the biblical model in successive generations. In this passage there is no mention of any prohibitions. No negations regarding sexual preference, divorce, or a host of ethical questions. It is a given that this is the biblical pattern based on the original sinless model. It is later passages such as the way this text is applied by Jesus to the issue of divorce, that we have explicit evidence about the divine intention in creating differentiated genders and Jesus’ commentary clarifies the way this text should be understood regarding monogamous lifetime marriage. In Genesis Chapter Two regarding marriage, wife and woman are synonymous terms in this passage and males are united with a wife who is a partner for physical intimacy and this person is a woman. This is a limitation that is placed upon males with whom they can share such physical relations with. It is considered a given. This is why at this stage there are no sanctions or directions stipulated about regulating gender preference. However, a male is limited to be joined to “his wife” singular – the implication that such a bond precludes polygamy or divorce. One male has one female/wife. As stated earlier, this is not the exhaustive set of conditions by which a male will leave his parents but it has significant meaning in defining what constitutes independent adulthood and when families become divided. Marriage is a significant event. Marriage entails involves a woman taken from man and so man takes a woman in marriage – it is a reflexive action and also means for the woman that she is reunited with her original source. These expressions could well be metaphorical in nature regarding the creation process and as stated earlier should not be used as a basis to construct scientific laws or principles, but they hold profound spiritual meaning especially when it is a representation of Christ and his Church. Male retrieval of a missing part thus restores him to his original creation form. He regains what was removed from him by union with a woman or wife. Males become whole in marriage, and this is not to develop a sense of proportion or percentage of what a woman constitutes to a man regarding a missing part, but the concept is important as to the significance of marriage. For the male it consists of wholeness, for the woman it consists in finding a compatible soul mate because the man is the source material for the unique construction of a woman thereby the affinity to a male and a commonality is established. Marriage is a blessing from God. It has limitations. Gender choice, numerical limitations, and duration. However, scripture clearly offers a justification for such an arrangement. A male and female can fulfil their roles as becoming a mother and father. Marriage means parenthood and grand parenthood by implication. Marriage means a creational purpose is fulfilled. This is why I was made! Marriage means physical intimacy in a context approved by the Creator. Marriage means for both genders finding wholeness for the male, and a person who is a soulmate for the woman. Both genders are unique creatures formed by God himself from different sources. Together they constitute a united entity. This text regulates male/female relationships but also upholds the dignity of both genders and mutuality. It offers a rationale for marriage which is foundational for developing social ethics that regulate our society.