Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

28 Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences Vol.

61, Issue 3 (2020) 28 - 37

Applying the Equivalent Plane Strain solution to


design the soft soil improvement by vertical drains
Nu Thi Nguyen
Faculty of Geosciences and Geoengineering, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article history:
The soft soil improvement by vertical drains (PVD, sand drains) are widely
Received 01st Feb. 2020 used in Vietnam. One of the methods is used for designing soft soil
Accepted 23rd May 2020 improvement by vertical drains is the Equivalent Plane Strain solution. To
Available online 30th June 2020 use this solution, the permeability coefficient of soil is converted into the
Keywords: equivalent permeability under plane strain. The paper presents the
Consolidation, application of this solution to design soft soil improvement by sand drains
at Km 3+130 Vi Thanh - Can Tho. It indicated that the settlement results
Sand drains,
of the soft ground treatment design based on Equivalent Plane Strain
Soft soil, solution are similar to those from the Axisymmetric Condition analysis
and field monitoring.

Copyright © 2020 Hanoi University of Mining and Geology. All rights reserved.

approximate Evgenev’s equation (Hoang Van Tan


1. Introduction
et al., 1977) and the results were unreliable.
The soft soil improvement by vertical drains Moreover, the method of calculating the total
has been widely applied in the world (Perera et al, settlement on the Vietnamese standard
2017) as well in Vietnam (Nguyen Thi Nu, 2016b). 22TCN262-2000 was only mentioned the
In order to design vertical drains, Barron (1948) drainage ability of the sand drains, but not any
and Hansbo (1981) were propsosed the decrease in settlement when treating the ground
consolidation theory of single wells. However, with sand drains, nor ignorance of the hardness of
there are some disadvantages of this analysis, sand drains.
such as the effect of the depth of the well was not Currently, in order to design soft soil
taken, the difference in compressibility of soil improvement by vertical drains, the finite element
environment and materials in the sand well were method by using Equivalent Plane Strain solution
ignored, etc. In designing the soft soil is being applied by some authors in the world
improvement by sand drains, the total settlement (Perera et al, 2017). In oder to use Equivalent
of the treated soil was determined by the Plane Strain solution, it is necessary to convert
Axisymmetric Condition analysis into Equivalent
_____________________ Plane Strain analysis, and it must be simulated the
*Corresponding author actual working conditions of the ground. The
E-mail: nguyenthinu@humg.edu.vn transition between these analyses was solved by
DOI: 10.46326/JMES.2020.61(3).01 Hird et al. (1992). However, this method ignored
Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61 (3), 28 - 37 29

the effects of disturbance and resistance of the 2 2𝑏𝑠 𝑏𝑠 𝑏𝑠2


well. Indraratna and Redana (1997) developed 𝛼= − (1 − + 2 ) (3)
3 𝐵 𝐵 3𝐵
this theory in the case of the analysis of soft soil
improvement by vertical drains and took into the 1 𝑏𝑠
𝛽= 2
2
(𝑏𝑠 − 𝑏𝑤 )2 + 2 (3𝑏𝑤 − 𝑏𝑠2 ) (4)
well drainage factor. Indraratna et al., (2005a,b,c) 𝐵 3𝐵
proposed the theory of consolidation in the case 2
2𝑘ℎ𝑝 𝑏𝑤
of soft soil improvement by vertical drains 𝜃= (1 − ) (5)
𝑘′ℎ𝑝 𝑞𝑧 𝐵 𝐵
incorporating with surcharge and vacuum
preloading and the method to convert Where B, bs, bw - the haft of the width of plane
Axisymmetric Condition analysis into Equivalent strain unit cell, the width of the drain, and the
Plane Strain solution. This theory has been proved width of the smear zone, respectively; khp and k’hp
by the these authors with actual practical works. - the smear zone permeability and the
In Vietnam, soft soil is widely distributed in undisturbed permeability for plane strain
most of deltas and needs to be improved by many conditions respectively; l - the length of drain well;
methods (Nhu Viet Ha, 2020, Nguyen Thi Nu, qz - the drain discharge capacity in plane strain
2020a, 2020b, Nguyen Thi Nu and Phi Hong condition; p - the indicated the plane strain
Thinh, 2020; Nguyen Thi Nu et al., 2019, Nguyen condition.
Thi Nu et al., 2019). The Equivalent Plane Strain The average degree of consolidation for
solution has not been studied and applied to the axisymmetric (𝑈ℎ ) condition is equal to the
practice of soft soil treatment in Vietnam. average degree of consolidation for plane strain
Therefore, the article aimed at introducing the (𝑈ℎ𝑝 ) condition at each time step and at a given
Equipment Plane Strain analysis of Indraratna et
stress level (Figure 1):
al. (2005a,b,c) and applying this method to design
the improvement of soft soil by sand drains in a (𝑈ℎ ) = (𝑈ℎ𝑝 ) (6)
case study of Vietnam.
The equivalent permeability under plane
2. Equivalent Plane Strain solution to design strain in undisturbed zone is converted from
soft soil improvement by vertical drains Axisymmetric condition can be determined as
follows:
2.1. Equivalent Plane Strain solution in case of 𝑘ℎ𝑝
𝑘ℎ𝑝 [𝛼+𝛽 +𝜃(2𝑙.𝑧−𝑧 2 )]
𝑘′ℎ𝑝
soft soil improvement by vertical drains = 𝑛 𝑘 3 𝑘 (7)
𝑘ℎ [𝑙𝑛( )+ ℎ 𝑙𝑛(𝑠)− +𝜋(2𝑙.𝑧−𝑧 2 ) ℎ ]
𝑠 𝑘′ℎ 4 𝑞𝑤
In order to design soft soil improvement by
vertical drains using the finite element method 𝑘′ℎ𝑝 𝛽
𝑘ℎ𝑝
= 𝑘ℎ𝑝 𝑛 𝑘 3
(8)
with the application geotechnical software such [𝑙𝑛( )+ ℎ 𝑙𝑛(𝑠)− ]−𝛼
𝑘ℎ 𝑠 𝑘′ℎ 4
as Plaxis 8.2, Indraratna and Redana (1997)
converted Barron and Hansbo's Axisymmetric Where n = B/bw; s = bs/ bw; qw- the drain
solution into Equivalent Plane Strain solution. discharge capacity; kh - the horizontal permeability
Indraratna and Redana (1997) indicated that coefficient of undisturbed zone; k’h - the horizontal
the average degree of consolidation (𝑈ℎ𝑝 ) on a permeability coefficient of smear zone.
horizontal plane at the depth z and at time t can be In case of neglecting well resistance and the
predicted from: smear effect, the ratio of equivalent permeability
under plane strain and the Axisymmetric
𝑢 −8𝑇ℎ𝑝 permeability in undisturbed zone can be
𝑈ℎ 𝑝 = 1 − = 1 − 𝑒𝑥𝑝 ( ) (1)
𝑢0 𝜇𝑝 determined as follows (Hird et al.,1992):
𝑘ℎ𝑝 0,67
Where 𝑢0 - the initial excess pore water = (9)
𝑘ℎ [𝑙𝑛(𝑛) − 0,75]
pressure; 𝑢 - the excess pore water pressure at t;
The drain discharge capacity under plane
Thp - the time factor for plane strain condition.
𝑘ℎ𝑝 strain was converted as following equation:
𝜇𝑝 = [𝛼 + 𝛽 + 𝜃(2𝑙. 𝑧 − 𝑧 2 )] (2) 2
𝑘′ℎ𝑝 𝑞𝑧 = 𝑞 (10)
𝜋𝐵 𝑤
30 Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61 (3), 28 - 37

coefficient of smear zone and horizontal


2.2. Equivalent Plane Strain solution in case of permeability coefficient of undisturbed zone is
soft soil improvement by vertical drains constant during the consolidation process.
incorporating with surcharge and vacuum - During the consolidation process, the
preloading relationship between the average void ratio and
Indraratna et al. (2005) established the logarithm of average effective stress in normally
Equivalent Plane Strain solution in case of soft soil consolidated range was expressed as follows
improvement by vertical drains incorporating (Figure 2a):
𝜎′
with surcharge and vacuum preloading based on 𝑒 = 𝑒0 − 𝐶𝑐 𝑙𝑜𝑔( ) (11)
following assumptions: 𝜎𝑖
- Soil is fully saturated and homogenous, If current vertical effective stress is smaller
lamina flow thorough the soil based on Darcy’s than the preconsolidation pressure (Pc), the
law. At the outer boundary of the unit cell, there is compression index Cc was replaced by the
not flow of water, and for the relatively long recompression index Cr.
vertical drains, only the radial flow is permitted to - For radial drainage, the horizontal
occur. coefficient of permeability of soil decreases with
- Soil strain is uniform at the boundary of unit the average void ratio (Figure 2b) as follows:
cell and the small strain theory is valid (Barron, 𝑘ℎ
𝑒 = 𝑒0 + 𝐶𝑘 𝑙𝑜𝑔( ) (12)
1948). The ratio of horizontal permeability 𝑘ℎ𝑖

Figure 1. Conversion of an axisymmetric unit cell into plane strain condition:


(a) axisymmetric; (b) plane strain (Indraratna và Redana ,1997).

Figure 2. a. Soil compression curve e-log’; b. Relationship between e-log kh (Indraratna, 2005c, 2008).
Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61 (3), 28 - 37 31

- The distribution of vacuum pressure along 𝑑𝑒


boundary of the drain is considered to vary 𝑛= (18)
linearly from -p0 to -k1p0 (Figure 3), where k1 is the 𝑑𝑤
ratio of the vacuum pressure at the top and the 𝑑𝑠
𝑠= (19)
bottom of vertical drains. 𝑑𝑤
In case of Axisymmetric Condition analysis,
𝑘ℎ𝑖 𝛾𝑤
the dissipation rate of average excess pore 𝑐ℎ𝑖 = (20)
pressure ration Ru = 𝑢𝑡 /𝛥𝑝 at any dimensionless 𝑚𝑣𝑖
time factor for horizontal drainage Th was chi - the horizontal coefficient of consolidation
calculated as follows: of soil; mvi - the coefficient of volume
𝑝0 (1 + 𝑘1 ) 8𝑇ℎ ∗ compressibility; w - the unit weigh of water.
𝑅𝑢 = (1 + ) 𝑒𝑥𝑝 (− )− In case of ignoring the smear effect:
𝛥𝑝 2 𝜇
𝑛 𝑘ℎ 3
𝑝0 (1 + 𝑘1 ) 𝜇 = 𝑙𝑛 ( ) + 𝑙𝑛( 𝑠) − (21)
(13) 𝑠 𝑘′ℎ 4
𝛥𝑝 2
In case of ignoring well resistance and the
where Th* - the modified time factor,
smear effects:
Th*= Pav*Th (14) 3
𝜇 = 𝑙𝑛(𝑛) − (22)
p - the preloading pressure; 𝑇ℎ - the 4
dimensionless time factor for horizontal drainage; If Cc/Ck = 1 and p0 = 0, equation (13) is similar
𝑐ℎ𝑖 𝑡 to the Hansbo equation (Hansbo, 1981):
𝑇ℎ = 2 (15)
𝑑𝑒 8𝑇ℎ ∗
𝑅𝑢 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 (− ) (23)
𝑃𝑎𝑣 = 0,5[1 + (1 + 𝛥𝑝/𝜎𝑖′ + 𝑝0 (1 𝜇
+ 𝑘1 )/2𝜎𝑖′ )1−𝐶𝑐 /𝐶𝑘 ] 16) The average horizontal degree of
 - the parameter indicating the geometry of consolidation at any time can be calculated as
vertical drains system and smear effect; following equation:
n2 n kh 3 s2 1 − 𝑅𝑢
μ= 2 [ln ( ) + ln( s) − ] + 2 × 𝑈ℎ = 100 (24)
n −1 s k′h 4 n −1 1 − 𝑅𝑢,𝑡=∞
s2 kh 1 s4 −1
(1 − ) + ( − s2 + 1) (17)
4n2 k′h n2 −1 4n2 In case of plane strain analysis, Indraratna et
al. (2005) expressed the ratio of the average

Figure 3. Cylindrical unit cell with linear vacuum pressure distribution (Indraratna, 2008).
32 Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61 (3), 28 - 37

𝑢𝑝 smear zone can be calculated by:


excess pore pressure for radial drainage
𝛥𝑝
𝑘′ℎ𝑝 𝛽
incorporation vacuum preloading as follows:
𝑘ℎ𝑝
= 𝑘ℎ𝑝 𝑛 𝑘 3
(35)
[𝑙𝑛( )+ ℎ 𝑙𝑛(𝑠)− ]−𝛼
𝑘ℎ 𝑠 𝑘′ℎ 4
𝑢𝑝 (1 + 𝑘1 ) 8𝑇ℎ𝑝
= (1 + 𝑝𝑜 ) 𝑒𝑥𝑝 (− )
𝛥𝑝 2𝛥𝑝 𝜇𝑝 In case of neglecting the smear effect, the
𝑝0 (1 + 𝑘1 ) ratio of equivalent permeability under plane
− (25) strain and the Axisymmetric permeability in
𝛥𝑝 2
undisturbed zone can be determined as follows:
𝑘ℎ𝑝
where 𝜇𝑝 = [𝛼 + 𝑘′ 𝑙𝑛( 𝛽) + 𝜃] (26) 2 (𝑛−1)2
ℎ𝑝 𝑘ℎ𝑝 3 𝑛2
=
2 (𝑛 − 𝑠)3 𝑘ℎ [𝑙𝑛(𝑛) − 0,75]
𝛼= (27) 0,67
3 𝑛2 (𝑛 − 1) ≈ (36)
[𝑙𝑛(𝑛) − 0,75]
2(𝑠 − 1)
𝛽= [𝑛(𝑛 − 𝑠 − 1) To apply the Equivalent Plane Strain solution
𝑛2 (𝑛 − 1)
1 to design soft soil improvement by sand drains,
+ (𝑠 2 + 𝑠 + 1)] (28) Plaxis 8.2 software 2D version was used. This
3
software uses finite element method to solve
4𝑘ℎ𝑝 1 geotechnical problems (Brinkgreve, 2002). To use
𝜃= (1 − ) 𝑙 2 (29)
3𝐵𝑞𝑧 𝑛 this solution, the ground is divided into element
𝐵 grids, based on the force balancing method
𝑛= (30) through the relationship between stress and
𝑏𝑤
strain, the displacement of element nodes, stress
𝑏𝑠 state, and deformation of the soil ground were
𝑠= (31)
𝑏𝑤 determined.
In case of the plane strain condition for
3. Applying the Equivalent Plane Strain
vertical drains incorporating with vacuum
solution to design soft soil improvement by
preloading (no preloading), the average excess
sand drains
pore pressure 𝑢 at time t is expressed as follows:
(1 + 𝑘1 )𝑝0 8𝑇ℎ𝑝 3.1. Designing soft soil improvement by sand
𝑢 = (1 + ) 𝑒𝑥𝑝 (− )
2 𝜇𝑝 drains
(1 + 𝑘1 )𝑝0
− (32) The project of construction road on soft soil
2 at Km 3 + 130 of the road connecting Vi Thanh
As shown in Figure 1, the average degree of
town to Can Tho city, Vietnam. The parameters of
consolidation for Axisymmetric (𝑈ℎ ) condition is road include the width of embankment of 11.8 m,
equal to the average degree of consolidation for slope factor of 1:2, and the height of embankment
planee strain (𝑈ℎ𝑝 ) condition at each time step of 4.8 m. The road embankment was designed in
and at a given stress level: two stages. At the first one, the time of
construction was 40 days, the speed of
(𝑈ℎ ) = (𝑈ℎ𝑝 ) (33)
construction was 10 cm/day, and the time for
The equivalent permeability under plane consolidation was 60 days; those in the stage 2
strain in undisturbed zone is converted from were 30 days, 6 cm/day, and 120 days
Axisymmetric condition can be determined as respectively. The total construction time for two
follows: stages was 250 days.
𝑘ℎ𝑝
The soil profile including three layers as
[𝛼+𝑘′ 𝑙𝑛(𝛽)+𝜃] following:
𝑘ℎ𝑝 ℎ𝑝
𝑘ℎ
= 𝑛 𝑘 3 2𝑘 (34) Layer 1: Very soft soil with the thickness of 14
[𝑙𝑛( )+ ℎ 𝑙𝑛(𝑠)− +𝜋 ℎ 𝑙 2 ]
𝑠 𝑘′ℎ 4 3𝑞𝑤
m;
The equivalent permeability within the Layer 2: Stift clay with the thickness of 6.0 m;
Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61 (3), 28 - 37 33

Layer 3: Very stiff clay with the thickness of based on the Equivalent Plane Strain solution. The
10 m. physico - mechanical properties are presented in
The timewater was at the depth of 4.0m Table 1.
under the surface. The soft soil samples were The soft soil was improved by sand drains.
taken from the boreholes and the properties of The parameters of sand drains are provided in
soil layers were determined at the Geotechnical Table 2.
Laboratory of Department of Engineering In order to design the improvement soft soil
Geology, Ha Noi University of Mining and Geology. by sand drains, the standard calculation method
The horizontal coefficient of permeability was (22TCN262-2000) and the Equipment Plane
determined by Rowe cell (Nguyen Thi Nu et al Strain solution on Plaxis 8.2 software 2D version
2011; Nguyen Thi Nu, 2014, 2016a, 2016b). The were used. During the improvement of soft soil,
effective cohesion and effective internal friction the settlement of road embankment was
angle was determined by consolidated undrained observed and monitored at the field. The results
triaxial compression tests (CU test). The of the total settlement, the maximum excess pore
horizontal permeability coefficient of the soft soil water pressure, and the consolidation time
improvement by sand drains was calculated between are shown in Table 3.
Table 1. The physico - mechanical properties of soil layer and filling soil.
Filling Very soft Clay, Sand
Physico- mechanical properties Clay, stiff
soil soil very stiff drains
Mohr Soft soil Soft soil Soft soil Mohr
Unit weight, usat, kN/m3
Coulomb model model model Coulomb
Saturated unit weight sat, kN/m3 17.6 15.9 19.7 20.1 17.6
Vertical permeability coefficient, ky, m/day 20.0 16.0 19.8 20.3 20.0
Horizontal permeability coefficient, kx, m/day 0.5 4.16.10-4 1.02.10-5 2.12.10-5 10
Verticla permeability coefficient, ky, m/day (ground
0.5 1.25.10-3 1.53.10-5 3.19.10-5 10
improvement by sand drains , n = 4.5)
Horizontal permeability coefficient, kx, m/day (ground
0.5 4.16.10-4 1.02.10-5 2.12.10-5 10
improvement by sand drains , n = 4.5)
Elastic modulus, E, (kN/m2) 0.5 1.11.10-3 1.53.10-5 3.19.10-5 10
Poisson's ratio, 30000 553.4
Effective friction angle,, degree 0.30 0.30
Effective cohesion, C' (kN/m ) 2 20 19 23 25 30
Dilatancy angle,  (degree) 1 10 12 14 1
Compression index, Cc 0 0 0 0 0
Swell index, Cr 0.90 0.15 0.11
initial void ration, e 0.20 0.03 0.02
Preconsolidation pressure, Pc (T/m2) 1.817 0.758 0.827
Unit weight, usat, kN/m3 4.5 11.0 13.0

Table 2. The parameters of sand drains.


No The parameters of sand drains
1 The distance between sand drains, L =1.8 m
2 Diameter of sand drains, D = 0.4 m
3 The length of sand drains, H = 14 m
4 Sand wells are arranged in an equilateral triangle
5 The ratio of distance, n = L/D = 4.5
6 The factor depends on the distance between sand drains, F(n) = n2/(n2-1) ln(n) - (3n2-1)/4n2 = 0.845
34 Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 60 (3), 28 - 37

Table 3. The result of settlement of road in soft soil and after improvement by sand drains
(Road embankment constructed with two stages up to 4.8 m).
Soft soil ground Soft soil improvment by The field
Calculating Calculating by sand drains (Calculating monitoring
Parameters
based on 22T Equivalent plane equivalent plane strain result at km
CN262-2000 strain solution solution) 3+130
The total settlement, Uy (m) 2.083 2.024 1.801 -
Excess pore water pressure, U
- 68.59 51.38 -
(kN/m2)
The time for degree consolidation
16008 3450 160 -
of 90%, t90 (day)
The settlement at the construction
- - 1.684 1.620
time of 250 days, m

From the results in Table 3, the settlement drains (D = 40 cm) and the distance of the sand
that was determined by equivalent strain plane drains (L = 1.8 m), the increase in the length of
solution is quite close to the calculation under the sand drains (H = 10 m, 14 m, 20 m) resulted in
Axisymmetric Condition analysis. The simulation decrease in the settlement of ground, the time of
results by Equivalent Plane Strain solution was consolidation, and the excess pore water
relatively consistent with the results of field pressure.
observations. From the experimental results, it also shown
As shown in Table 3, it can be seen that the that if the length of sand drains of 14 m and 20 m,
total settlement of road embankment constructed the settlement of ground does not change. When
in soft soil (Uy) was 2.083 m. Otherwise, the total sand drains installed into stiff clay, the settlement
settlement of road embankment constructed in of the ground does not decrease. Thus, the sand
soft soil improvement by sand drains was 1.801 m drains do not need to install into the stiff clay or
and the time requested to achieve 90% very stiff clay under soft layer.
consolidation was 160 days. With a construction
3.2.2. Distance of sand drains
period of 250 days, the total settlement was 1.684
m and the degree of consolidation achieved In case of constant the diameter (D = 40 cm)
93.5%. After the 250-day construction period, the and the length (H = 14 m) of sand drains, the
pore water pressure of the treated ground was distance of sand drains changes in three cases L =
reduced from 68.59 kN/m2 (Figure 4) to 51.38 1.6 m; L = 1.8 m and L = 2.2 m. Figure 7 shows that
kN/m2 (Figure 5) and located far from the bottom an increase in distance of sand drains resulted in
of the road embankment, so it will not affect to the an increase in settlement of ground. However, the
stability of road embankment (Figure 5). Thus, difference in the settlement between the case L =
sand drains was not only shorten construction 1.6 m and L = 1.8 m slightly changed. The
time but also greatly decrease the settlement of difference in the settlement between the case L =
the road embankment. 1.8 m and L = 2.0 m is rather high.
3.2.3. Diameter of sand drains
3.2. Effect of parameters of sand drains
In case of constant the distance (L = 1.8 m)
When using the Equivalent Plane Strain
and the length (H = 14 m) of sand drains, the
solution, it is possible to analyze the factors
diameter of sand drains changes in three cases D
affecting the results of soil soft improvment by
= 30 cm; D = 40 cm and D = 50 cm. As shown in
sand drains.
Figure 8, the settlement of ground almost does not
3.2.1. The length of sand drains change. The results also shows that the increase in
the density of soft ground when sand drains
As shown in Figure 6, it can be seen that in
constructed has not been noticed in this solution.
case of constant parameters of diameter sand
Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 60 (3), 28 - 37 35

Figure 4. Excess pore pressure in soft ground after construction road without sand drains.

Figure 5. Excess pore pressure in treatment soft ground by sand drains after construction road 250 days.

Figure 6. The settlement of ground with different lengths of sand drains.


36 Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61 (3), 28 - 37

Figure 7. The settlement of ground with different distances of sand drains.

Figure 8. The settlement of ground with different diameters of sand drains.

718-742.
4. Conclusion Brinkgreve, R. B. J., (2002). Plaxis 2D-Version 8
To use the Equivalent Plane Strain solution, it Manual, Balkema.
is only to convert the horizontal permeability Hansbo, S., (1981). Consolidation of fine-grained
coefficient in the Axisymmetric condition into the soils by prefabricated drains. Proc. 10th Int.
horizontal permeability coefficient in the plane Conf. Soil Mech., Stockholm, Vol. 3, Paper 12/22.
condition at the same degree of consolidation. pp. 677-682.
The Equivalent Plane Strain solution for
Hird, C. C., Pyrah, I. C., Russell, D, (1992). Finite
analysing the soft soil improvement by sand
element modeling of vertical drains beneath
drains can be observed the development of the
embankments on soft ground. Geotechnique 42
excess pore water pressure during the
(3), 499-511.
construction of road embankment. The length and
the distance of sand drains affected on the total Hoang Van Tan, Tran Ngo, Phan Dinh Truong,
settlement and the time of consolidation. Pham Xuan, Nguyen Hai, (1977). Construction
For using the Equivalent Plane Strain solution methods on soft ground. Construction
to design soft soil improvement, the increase in Publishers. Hanoi. (In Vietnamese).
the density of the soft ground during construction Indraratna, B., (2008). Recent advancements in
of sand drains has not been noticed. the use of prefabricated vertical drains in soft
soils. Australian Geomechanics Journal, March
References issue, 29-46.
22TCN 262-2000, (2000). Survey and design Indraratna, B., and Redana, I. W., (1997). Plane
procedures of highway constructed on soft soil strain modeling of smear effects associated
ground. with vertical drains. J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE.
Barron, R. A., (1948). Consolidation of fine - 123(5), 474 - 478.
grained soils by drain wells, Proc. ASCE 2346.
Nu Thi Nguyen/Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 60 (3), 28 - 37 37

Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn C., and Earth Sciences 61 (1). 92-100. (In Vietnamese).
Sathananthan, I. (2005a). Analytical and Nguyen Thi Nu, Do Minh Toan, Nguyen Viet Tinh,
numerical solutions for a single vertical drain (2011). Determining the parameters of
including the effects of vacuum preloading. consolidation of amQ22-3 soft to very soft clay
Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42. 994-1014. (CL, CH) distributed in Soc Trang area for
Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn C., and calculating settlement of soil and ground
Sathananthan, I., (2005c). Radial consolidation improvement by vertical drains method.
of clay using compressibility indices and Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences
varying horizontal permeability. Canadian 35/07/2011. 32-39. (In Vietnamese).
Geotechnical Journal 42, 1330-1341. Nguyen Thi Nu, Nguyen Thanh Duong, Nguyen
Indraratna, B., Sathananthan, I., Rujikiatkamjorn Van Phong (2019). The effects of salt contents
C. and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (2005b). on the geotechnical properties of some soft
Analytical and numerical modeling of soft soil soils in the coastal area of Vietnam. Journal of
stabilized by PVD incorporating vacuum Mining and Earth Sciences 60 (6), 51-60.
preloading. International Journal of Nguyen Thi, N., Thinh, P. H., Son, B. T, (2019).
Geomechanics 5 (2). 114-124. Utilizing coal bottom ash from Thermal Power
Nguyen Thi Nu and Phi Hong Thinh, (2020). Soft Plants in Vietnam as partial replacement of
soils in the Me Kong Delta of Vietnam. aggregates in concrete pavement. Journal of
ActuAlscience 4(1), 24-31. Engineering, 2019
Nguyen Thi Nu, (2014). Researching of Nhu Viet Ha, (2020). Challenges and approaches
engineering geological properties of soft in three-dimensional modeling the
clayey soil amQ22-3 distribution in the coastal engineering geological conditions of Hanoi
provinces of Mekong delta for ground area. Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences 61
improvement for road construction. Doctoral (2). 1-9.
thesis in Geology. Ha Noi (In Vietnamese). Nu, N. T., Toan, D. M., Thinh, P. H, Son, B. T.,
Nguyen Thi Nu, (2016a). Geotechnical properties (2020b). Determination of Particles and
of soft clayey soil in the amQ22-3 formation in Minerals Content in Soft Clay Soil of the
the coastal provinces of Mekong Deltal for road Mekong Delta Coastal Provinces, Southern
construction. Journal of Mining and Earth Vietnam for Inorganic Adhesives Stabilization.
Sciences 6-10. 49-57 Determination of Particles and Minerals
Nguyen Thi Nu, (2016b). Design approval for soft Content in Soft Clay Soil of the Mekong Delta
soil ground using prefabricated vertical drains Coastal Provinces, Southern Vietnam for
and combination of vacuum preloading. Inorganic Adhesives Stabilization. Iraqi Journal
Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences, of Science 61(4). 791-804.
30/08/2016. 46-54. (In Vietnamese). Perera, D., Indraratna, B., Leroueil, S.,
Nguyen Thi Nu, Bui Truong Son, Do Minh Ngoc. Rujikiatkamjorn, C., & Kelly, R., (2017).
(2019). An Experimental study of reusing coal Analytical model for vacuum consolidation
ash for base course of road pavement. incorporating soil disturbance caused by
Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering mandrel-driven drains. Canadian Geotechnical
24(4), 945-960. Journal 54(4). 547-560.
Nguyen Thi Nu, Bui Truong Son, Pham Van Hai. Tavenas, P., Jean, P., Leblond, P., and Leroueil, S,
(2020a). Utilisation of ground granulated blast (1983). The permeability of natural soft clays.
furnace slag (GGBFS) for soft soil improvement Part II: permeability characteristics. Canadian
by deep mixing method. Journal of Mining and Geotechnical Journal 20. 645-659.

You might also like