Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY
OLONGAPO CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
14 St., Rizal ave. East Tapinac Olongapo City, Zambales

Research 1: ORAL DEFENSE EVALUATION FORM

Research Title:

Group Leader:

GROUP MEMBERS:

DATE OF DEFENSE TIME

NAME OF PANELIST SIGNATURE

The quantitative rating given by the panel is to be used as a guide for the recommendation or final
evaluation at the end of the system defense.

INSTRUCTIONS TO THE EVALUATOR

Place a circle mark at the appropriate box given the following evaluation scores:

5 96 – 100 –Excellent

4 91 – 95 - Very Good

3 86 – 90 - Good

2 81 – 85 - Passed

1 below 81- Failed

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY
OLONGAPO CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
14 St., Rizal ave. East Tapinac Olongapo City, Zambales

EVALUATION CRITERIA
I. TITLE CONTENT
5 4 3 2 1

1. Proper usage and selection of terms in writing the research title.

2. The content is clear and concise and deals with important issues in the field
of study, information is accurate.
3. Completeness of analysis discussion on the relevance of the research in the
society.

4. Feasibility of the study.

5. Graphics explain and reinforce screen text. The graphics and text are clear
and easy to follow. No misspellings and grammatical errors.

II. PRESENTATION CONTENT

5 4 3 2 1

11. Clarity and organization of presentation delivery.

12. Adequacy of visual aids and other tools used for the presentation.

13. Ability to answer questions analytically and convincingly.

14. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented.

15. Ability to present smoothly with confidence.

INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY
OLONGAPO CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
14 St., Rizal ave. East Tapinac Olongapo City, Zambales

Group Name/Number:

DATE OF DEFENSE TIME

EVALUATOR’S NAME SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR

The panelist gives comments on how each member of the group performed during the
defense.

Group Member Name:

I. COMMUNICATION SKILLS 5 4 3 2 1
1. Voice Projection (distance reached)
2. Voice Modulation (pleasantness of voice)
3. Diction/Pronunciation
4. Grammar/Syntax; Understandability
5. Professionally Dressed
II. WORK ORGANIZATION
6. Preparedness
7. Ability to present the assigned topic(s) clearly
8. Participation in the defense
III. EFFECTIVENESS
9. Ability to answer questions
10. Ability to convince the panelists of the ideas being presented
Total:
Other Comment(s):
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY
OLONGAPO CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
14 St., Rizal ave. East Tapinac Olongapo City, Zambales

REVISION LIST FORM

Group Name:

Group Leader:

DATE OF DEFENSE TIME

LEAD PANELIST SIGNATURE

The following revisions need to be complied with by the group. Further evaluation on the research
paper will be done depending on the indicated result in the Recommendation Sheet.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY
OLONGAPO CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
14 St., Rizal ave. East Tapinac Olongapo City, Zambales

RECOMMENDATION SHEET

Group Name / Number:

Group Leader:
DATE OF DEFENSE TIME

LEAD PANELIST/ADVISER SIGNATURE

RECOMMENDATION

CONDITIONAL PASS WITH NO REVISION

CONDITIONAL PASS WITH MINOR REVISION*

to be checked by the Research Manager

CONDITIONAL PASS WITH MAJOR REVISION*

to be checked by the Research Manager
*Revisions needed to be complied with are in the Revision List Form.

REDEFENSE

FAIL**
Indicate the names of students who failed (no listing means all members of the group)

**Reason(s) for failure:

Incompleteness of the output
Incorrectness of the output
Non-original (copied from existing sources)
Output(s)/deliverable(s) were made by individuals other than members of the group
Others (specify):
**Condition(s) of failure:
Change the entire project by submitting a new proposal for approval
Continue working on the same topic including the necessary revisions and requirements
Others (specify):