Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 1006@excr 1996 0098
10 1006@excr 1996 0098
10 1006@excr 1996 0098
fered saline (PBS), centrifuged, resuspended in culture medium, and Fluorescent Staining of Vinculin, ICAM-1, Integrins a5b1, aVb1,
plated onto plain and grooved substrata. a3b1, and Phosphotyrosine
FIG. 1. P388D1 macrophage spread on (a) plain fused silica substratum. (bar, 5 mm); (b) well-spread macrophage with numerous
microvilli on microgrooved substratum, groove depth 71 nm. (bar, 5 mm); (c) P388D1 macrophages spread on plain (rhs) and grooved (lhs)
substratum, 15 min after cell plating (bar, 20 mm). (a) and (b) represent scanning electron micrographs, (c) is a phase-contrast image.
bated with fluorescent bead suspension for 5 h at 377C. Then slides Fifteen minutes after plating most cells remained
were rinsed thoroughly with PBS to remove the excess of beads, and
attached but rounded and not very well spread. As re-
cells were fixed with methanol for 10 min and allowed to air dry.
Slides were then flooded with xylene, air dried, mounted in 50% vealed by the electron scanning micrographs, most of
glycerol, and examined under a fluorescent microscope. The number the cells had fairly smooth surface with only few mi-
of beads/cell was counted in 200 cells on each kind of substratum. crospikes (Fig. 1a). The average cell spread area was
430 mm2, SD 160.
Statistical Analysis
Cells plated on patterned substrata had a substan-
For each variation of substrate and treatment, 100 cells were ana- tially different morphology from cells on plain sub-
lyzed. Means, standard deviations, and variances were calculated
for the cell spreading area, elongation, orientation, and the parame- strata (Figs. 1b and 1c). Fifteen minutes after plating
ters of cell movement. Student’s t test was used to compare groups cells were already attached and well spread. Cells ex-
of results. tended numerous microspikes, usually perpendicular
to the groove direction (Fig. 1b). The spread area of
RESULTS cells on 282-nm-deep grooves was two times greater
than the spread area of cells on a plain surface. The
Changes in Cell Spreading, Morphology, and reaction of cells to nanogrooves continued for as long
Orientation as the cells were cultured. Table 1 shows data on
P388D1 macrophages cultured on plain fused silica spread areas and orientation of P388D1 macrophages
substrata attached and spread in 20–30 min (Fig. 1). and normal rat peritoneal macrophages on grooves 30–
TABLE 1
The Spread Area and Orientation of P388D1 Macrophages and Normal Rat Peritoneal Macrophages on Plain Fused Silica
Substrata and Gratings with Groove Depths of 30, 44, and 282 nm and Widths of 2 and 10 mm
Note. Rat peritoneal macrophages are given two values for cell area and orientation. The values in brackets are for macrophages which
were plated on substrata covered with ConA. Student’s t test was applied to compare the spread area of cells on plain substratum with the
area and orientation of cells spread on gratings.
* P õ 0.05; **P õ 0.01.
282 nm deep. Even substrata with very shallow phages. The effect of grooves on cell orientation is
grooves, 30 nm deep, were able to induce rapid changes shown in Table 1. Cell orientation increased with the
in cell spreading and orientation. P388D1 macrophages decreasing pitch and increasing depth of the gratings.
were firmly attached to the substratum and elongated Since most of the nonactivated peritoneal macrophages
along groove/ridge boundaries. were very loosely attached to the gratings, we covered
The degree of orientation of cells increased with in- the structure with concanavalin A. The treatment im-
creasing depth and with decreasing width of the proved cell adhesion and orientation on gratings (Ta-
grooves. This was shown by the decreasing variance ble 1).
and mean value of the orientation angle in cells grown
on patterned substrata (Table 1). The increase in cell F-actin Distribution and Content
spread area in cells on patterned surfaces compared to
cells on smooth substrata was significant for all kinds F-actin in cells on plain substrata was concentrated
of gratings. However, although we observed a small close to the cell margin and in a few areas where cells
increase in cell spread area with increasing grove depth extended pseudopodia (Fig. 2a). Cells were rounded
and decreasing pitch, the effects of groove width and and not very well spread. Cells cultured on patterned
depth on cell spread area were not statistically signifi- substrata showed a bright staining of F-actin concen-
cant. trated along groove/ridge boundaries. The staining was
The increase in cell spreading and orientation was concentrated in places of cell attachment (Figs. 2b and
also observed in cells which encountered single steps 2c). TEM micrographs of transverse sections of P388D1
(Fig. 4a). cells spread on grooves show an accumulation of elec-
Normal peritoneal macrophages were also guided by tron-dense material localized in the cortical layer of
nanogrooves, although they were less sensitive to topo- cytoplasm and related in its position to the groove/ridge
graphical guidance than P388D1 cells. A significant boundary (Figs. 5c and 5d).
increase in spread area was observed only in cells The measurement of the F-actin content in P388D1
plated on grooves deeper than 71 nm; shallower cells cultured for 15 min showed that cells on patterned
grooves did not have a significant effect on the orienta- substrata contained two times more F-actin than cells
tion and spread area of normal peritoneal macro- on plain substrata (Fig. 3). The F-actin content did
FIG. 2. F-actin distribution in P388D1 cells (a) on plain fused silica substrata; (b) P388D1 macrophage on gratings, 44-nm-deep grooves,
4-mm pitch; (c) normal peritoneal macrophage on gratings 71 nm deep; (d) confocal single plane section of macrophage on grooves 124 nm
deep, actin staining. Bars, 5 mm.
not depend on groove width but showed dependence on flection images of cells attached to the gratings showed
groove depth. that actin and vinculin were found in places of close
Normal peritoneal macrophages showed the same apposition of the cell membrane to the substratum,
pattern of F-actin aggregation as P388D1 cells (Figs. which corresponded to groove/ridge boundaries (Fig.
2c and 2d). We did not observe any regular arrange- 4d). This was mainly observed underneath the cell nu-
ment of F-actin in cells on grooves 30 and 40 nm deep cleus and at the leading edge of the cell.
which correlated with the poor effect of these gratings Phosphotyrosine staining in P388D1 macrophages
on cell orientation. Peritoneal macrophages cultured cultured on nanogrooves colocalized with actin and vin-
on patterned substrata with a groove depth of 124 nm culin (Fig. 4f). Cells cultured on plain substrata showed
and a width of 2 mm contained 18% SD 9% more F- dot-like, punctuate staining of phosphotyrosine, which
actin than cells cultured on plain substrata. did not correspond to the distribution of F-actin (Fig.
Vinculin, Membrane Receptors, and Phosphotyrosine 4e). Normal peritoneal macrophages which were
Staining guided by the structure showed a similar pattern of
The staining of vinculin in P388D1 macrophages co- staining.
localized with actin (Figs. 4b and 4c). Interference-re- In preliminary studies we stained some of the cell
FIG. 5. Distribution of vitronectin receptors, aV integrins, in P388D1 macrophages cultured on (a) plain substratum and (b) patterned
substratum, groove width 2 mm. Bar, 5 mm. (c, d) Electron micrographs of a P388D1 macrophages spread over a step 140 nm high. Transverse
sections. (c) A 150-nm-thick section and (d) a 60-nm-thick section; g, groove; r, ridge; the arrow points to the electron-dense areas at the
groove/ridge boundary. Bars, 100 nm.
nogrooves increases their phagocytotic activity. In mac- fibronectin or laminin increases their phagocytotic ac-
rophages, activation of C3 receptors occurs via inte- tivity. We report an accumulation of aV integrins, colo-
grin–ligand interactions [14]. It was shown by Wright calized with vinculin and F-actin along groove/ridge
et al. [21] and Bohnsack et al. [22] that the adhesion of boundaries in cells spread on patterned substrata. This
macrophages to surfaces coated with covalently bound suggests that the activation of macrophages by topog-
FIG. 4. Vinculin and tyrosine kinase distribution in cells grown on patterned substrata. (a) Alignment of P388D1 cells along a single
step, height 44 nm. Bar, 20 mm. (b) Vinculin in macrophage reacting with a single step 44 nm high. Bar, 5 mm. (c) Vinculin staining in
P388D1 macrophage on gratings 71 nm deep. Bar, 5 mm. (d) Interference-reflection image of a macrophage on gratings, 71 nm deep. Darker
places correspond to the cell membrane being closer to the substratum. The image was obtained with the use of 100X objective, recorded
by the low light level camera and photographed from the computer monitor. Bar, 5 mm. (e) Distribution of proteins with phosphotyrosine
residues in a macrophage on plain substratum and (f) in a macrophage on gratings 71 nm deep. Cells were fixed and stained 15 min after
plating. Bars, 5 mm.
REFERENCES
FIG. 7. Phagocytosis of P388D1 cells cultured on plain and pat-
terned surfaces. Cells were cultured for 5 h with a suspension of 1. Dunn, G. A., and Ebendal, T. (1978) Exp. Cell Res. 101, 1–14.
fluorescent beads. The number of beads phagocytosed by 100 cells 2. Haston, W. S., Shields, J. M., and Wilkinson, P. C. (1983) Exp.
on plain and patterned surfaces was counted. Student’s t test was Cell Res. 146, 177–126.
used to compare phagocytosis of cells on plain and patterned sur- 3. Wilkinson, P. C., and Lackie, J. M. (1983) Exp. Cell Res. 145,
faces. *P õ 0.05. 255–264.
4. Gallin, J. I., and Quie, P. (1978) Leukocyte Chemotaxis: Meth- 15. Warn, R., Brown, D., Dowrick, P., Prescott, A., and Warn, A.
ods, Physiology, and Clinical Implications. Raven Press, New (1993) in Cell Behaviour: Adhesion and Motility (Jones, G., Wig-
York. ley, C., and Warn, R., Eds.), pp. 325–338, SEB Symposium No.
5. Clark, P., Connolly, P., Curtis, A. S. G., Dow, J. A. T., and 47.
Wilkinson, C. D. W. (1990) Development 108, 635–644. 16. Cantley, L. C., Auger, K. R., Carpenter, C., Duckworth, B.,
6. Curtis, A. S. G., and Clark, P. (1990) Crit. Rev. Biocompatibility Graziani, A., Kapeller, R., and Soltoff, S. (1991) Cell 64, 281–
5, 343–362. 302.
7. Clark, P., Connoly, P., Curtis, A. S. G., Dow, J. A. T., and Wilkin- 17. Gould, K. L., Cooper, J. A., Bretsher, A., and Hunter, T. (1986)
son, C. D. W. (1991) J. Cell Sci. 99, 73–77. J. Cell Biol. 102, 660–669.
8. Brunette, D. M. (1986) Exp. Cell Res. 164, 11–26. 18. Bretscher, A. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 921–930.
9. Wójciak, B., Crossan, J., Curtis, A. S. G., and Wilkinson, 19. Hunter, T., and Cooper, J. A. (1981) Cell 24, 741–752.
C. D. W. (1995) J. Mater. Sci. 6, 266–271.
20. Dunn, G. A., and Heath, J. P. (1976) Exp. Cell Res. 101, 1–14.
10. Wójciak-Stothard, B., Madeja, Z., Korohoda, W., Curtis, A., and
Wilkinson, C. (1995) Cell Biol. Int. Rep., in press. 21. Wright, S. C., Craigmyle, L. S., and Silverstein, S. C. (1983) J.
Exp. Med. 158, 1338–1343.
11. Curtis, A. S. G., Wilkinson, C., and Wojciak-Stothard, B. (1995)
Cell. Eng. Inc. Mol. Eng., in press. 22. Bohnsack, J. F., Kleinmann, H. K., Takahashi, T., O’Shea, J. J.,
and Brown, E. J. (1985) J. Exp. Med. 161, 912–923.
12. Dunn, G. A., and Brown, A. F. (1986) J. Cell Sci. 83, 313–340.
13. Van Furth, R., and Diesselhoff-Den Dulk M. M. (1980) Scand. 23. Kornberg, L. J., Earp, H. S., Turner, C. E., Prockop, C., and
J. Immunol. 12, 265–269. Juliano, R. L. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8392–8396.
14. Gingell, D. (1993) Contact Signalling and Cell Motility (Jones, 24. Hynes, R. O. (1992) Cell 69, 11–25.
G., Wigley, C., and Warn, R., Eds.), pp. 1–33, SEB Symposium 25. Chou, L., Firth, J. D., Uitto, V. J., and Brunette, D. M. (1995)
No. 47. J. Cell Sci. 108, 1563–1573.