AGE

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
18-20 16 15.8 15.8 18.8
20-30 75 74.3 74.3 93.1
30-40 5 5.0 5.0 98.0
40-50 1 1.0 1.0 99.0
50-60 1 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
The age distribution in the sample of 101 respondents reveals a notable concentration in the
"20-30" age group, encompassing 74.3% of the participants. The second most prevalent age range
is "18-20," accounting for 15.8% of the sample. Beyond this, the "30-40," "40-50," and "50-60"
categories represent smaller proportions of 5%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. The cumulative
percentages demonstrate a gradual accumulation of respondents across age groups, culminating in
a total sample size of 101. Overall, the data underscores a predominant representation of individuals
in their twenties, with diminishing frequencies in older age brackets.

DEGREE
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
BBA 17 16.8 16.8 19.8
BCA 24 23.8 23.8 43.6
B COM 19 18.8 18.8 62.4
CA
B COM 22 21.8 21.8 84.2
 BE 16 15.8 15.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
Within the surveyed sample of 101 respondents, the distribution of educational degrees
reveals a diverse landscape. The most prevalent degree is "BCA," comprising 23.8% of the
participants, followed closely by "B COM" at 21.8% and "BBA" at 16.8%. The degree "B COM
CA" is represented by 18.8% of respondents, while "BE" constitutes 15.8% of the sample.
Cumulatively, the data indicates a varied educational background, with a notable concentration in
computer-related degrees such as "BCA" and "B COM CA." The total sample size is 101,
encompassing individuals with different academic qualifications.

HOME TOWN
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
1 15 14.9 14.9 17.8
2 25 24.8 24.8 42.6
3 26 25.7 25.7 68.3
4 10 9.9 9.9 78.2
5 22 21.8 21.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
Within the dataset encompassing responses from 101 individuals, the distribution of hometowns
offers insights into the geographical diversity of the sample. Notably, hometown category "3"
emerges as the most prevalent, representing 25.7% of the respondents. Following closely, category
"2" accounts for 24.8%, contributing significantly to the overall distribution. Categories "5" and
"1" also exhibit substantial representation, at 21.8% and 14.9%, respectively. Meanwhile,
categories "4" and "Valid" contribute to 9.9% and 3.0%, respectively. The cumulative percentages
portray the gradual aggregation of respondents across the various hometown categories. Overall,
the dataset indicates a diverse range of hometown origins among the respondents, with notable
concentrations in specific categories and a dispersed distribution across others.

DESIGNATION

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 4 4.0 4.0 4.0
BUSINESS 19 18.8 18.8 22.8
DEVELOPMENT
MANAGER
FINANCIAL 21 20.8 20.8 43.6
ANALYSIST
DATA ANALYSTICS 31 30.7 30.7 74.3
PROJECT MANAGER 9 8.9 8.9 83.2
HR 17 16.8 16.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset comprising responses from 101 individuals, the distribution of professional
designations provides an overview of the occupational diversity within the sample. The "Valid"
row denotes the total number of valid responses. Notably, the most prevalent designation is "DATA
ANALYSTICS," representing 30.7% of the respondents. Following closely, "FINANCIAL
ANALYST" and "BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER" contribute significantly, with
percentages of 20.8% and 18.8%, respectively. "HR" represents 16.8% of the sample, while
"PROJECT MANAGER" constitutes 8.9%. The cumulative percentages demonstrate the gradual
accumulation of respondents across different designations. Overall, the dataset suggests a varied
distribution of professional roles, with a notable concentration in data analytics and substantial
representation in financial analysis, business development management, human resources, and
project management.

WORLING EXPERIENCE
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
1 YEAR 14 13.9 13.9 16.8
2 YEARS 21 20.8 20.8 37.6
3 YEARS 31 30.7 30.7 68.3
4 YEARS 13 12.9 12.9 81.2
MORE THAN 5 19 18.8 18.8 100.0
YEARS
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset comprising 101 respondents, the distribution of working experience provides
insights into the professional tenure of the individuals. The "Valid" row represents the total number
of valid responses. Notably, the majority of respondents have accrued "3 YEARS" of working
experience, constituting 30.7% of the sample. Following closely, individuals with "2 YEARS" of
experience contribute significantly at 20.8%, while those with "MORE THAN 5 YEARS"
represent 18.8%. The cumulative percentages illustrate the progressive accumulation of
respondents based on their years of experience. Overall, the data suggests a varied distribution of
working experience, with a notable concentration in the 3-year category and substantial
representation in the 2-year and more than 5-year categories.

PREVIOUS COMPANY
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 4 4.0 4.0 4.0
1 17 16.8 16.8 20.8
 2 23 22.8 22.8 43.6
3 26 25.7 25.7 69.3
4 11 10.9 10.9 80.2
5 20 19.8 19.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset of 101 respondents, the distribution of individuals' previous company
experiences sheds light on the diversity of professional backgrounds within the sample. The
"Valid" row represents the total number of valid responses. Notably, the most common category is
"3," signifying respondents with experience from their third previous company, constituting 25.7%
of the sample. Following closely, categories "2" and "5" contribute significantly at 22.8% and
19.8%, respectively. Cumulative percentages depict the gradual accumulation of respondents based
on their previous company experiences. Overall, the data suggests a varied distribution of
individuals with experiences from different previous companies, with a notable concentration in
the third company category and substantial representation in the second and fifth categories.

PREVIOUS PROJECT WORKED

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
OPERATION 15 14.9 14.9 17.8
MANAGER
SUPPLY CHAIN 21 20.8 20.8 38.6
MANAGER
MARKETING 27 26.7 26.7 65.3
MANAGER
ENTERPRENEUR 14 13.9 13.9 79.2
HUMAN RESOURCE 21 20.8 20.8 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0
INTERPERATION:
In the dataset consisting of 101 respondents, the distribution of previous project experiences
provides insights into the diversity of professional roles within the sample. The "Valid" row
represents the total number of valid responses. Notably, the most prevalent category is
"MARKETING MANAGER," encompassing 26.7% of the respondents. Following closely,
"SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGER" and "HUMAN RESOURCE" categories contribute significantly
at 20.8% each. Cumulative percentages depict the progressive accumulation of respondents based
on their previous project experiences. Overall, the data indicates a varied distribution of individuals
with diverse project backgrounds, with a notable concentration in marketing management,
substantial representation in supply chain management and human resources, and contributions
from other roles such as operation manager and entrepreneur.

PREVIOUS LOCATION
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
CHENNAI 14 13.9 13.9 16.8
BANGALO 24 23.8 23.8 40.6
UR
COIMBATO 26 25.7 25.7 66.3
R
ERODE 20 19.8 19.8 86.1
TIRUPUR 14 13.9 13.9 100.0
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset of 101 respondents, the distribution of previous locations of work offers
insights into the geographical diversity of professional experiences within the sample. The "Valid"
row represents the total number of valid responses. Notably, the most common location is
"COIMBATORE," accounting for 25.7% of respondents. Following closely, "BANGALORE" and
"ERODE" contribute significantly at 23.8% and 19.8%, respectively. Cumulative percentages
illustrate the gradual accumulation of respondents based on their previous work locations. Overall,
the data suggests a diverse distribution of individuals with professional experiences in various
locations, with a notable concentration in Coimbatore, substantial representation in Bangalore and
Erode, and contributions from other locations such as Chennai and Tirupur.

SALARY EXPECTED
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 10000-20000 15 14.9 15.3 15.3
20000-30000 23 22.8 23.5 38.8
30000-40000 28 27.7 28.6 67.3
40000-50000 12 11.9 12.2 79.6
ABLOVE 20 19.8 20.4 100.0
60000
Total 98 97.0 100.0
Missing System 3 3.0
Total 101 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset of 101 respondents, the breakdown of salary expectations provides insights
into the preferred income ranges within the sample. Notably, the majority of respondents express
expectations in the "30000-40000" range, comprising 28.6% of the sample. The "20000-30000"
category is also prominent, chosen by 23 respondents, or 23.5%. Additionally, respondents aiming
for salaries "ABOVE 60000" contribute significantly at 20.4%. Cumulatively, the data illustrates
a varied distribution of salary expectations, with a concentration in the mid-range and substantial
representation in other income categories. It's important to note that three responses are missing
salary expectations in this dataset. Overall, the findings suggest diverse salary preferences within
the sample.
 Preferred location
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
CHENNAI 13 12.9 12.9 15.8
BANGALOU 24 23.8 23.8 39.6
R
MUMBAI 24 23.8 23.8 63.4
ERODE 21 20.8 20.8 84.2
TIRUPUR 15 14.9 14.9 99.0
COIMBATO 1 1.0 1.0 100.0
RE
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset comprising responses from 101 individuals, the distribution of preferred job
locations offers insights into geographical preferences within the sample. The "Valid" row indicates
the total number of valid responses. Notably, respondents exhibit diverse location preferences, with
significant percentages in "BANGALORE" and "MUMBAI," each representing 23.8% of the
sample. "ERODE" and "TIRUPUR" also contribute substantially, at 20.8% and 14.9%,
respectively. Cumulative percentages depict the gradual accumulation of respondents based on
their preferred job locations. Overall, the data suggests a varied distribution of location preferences
among the respondents, with concentrations in specific cities such as Bangalore and Mumbai, and
significant representation in Erode and Tirupur.
 WORK FROM HOME\ OFFICE
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
WFH 51 50.5 50.5 53.5
OFFIC 47 46.5 46.5 100.0
E
Total 101 100.0 100.0

INTERPERATION:
In the dataset consisting of 101 respondents, the distribution of preferences regarding work
arrangements (work from home vs. office) reveals distinct trends. The "Valid" row indicates the
total number of valid responses. Notably, there is a balanced preference among respondents, with
50.5% expressing a desire for "WFH" (Work From Home) and 46.5% preferring the traditional
"OFFICE" setting. Cumulative percentages depict the gradual accumulation of respondents based
on their work arrangement preferences. Overall, the data suggests a nearly equal split in preferences
between working from home and working in an office environment among the surveyed
individuals.