Final Day - Grade 7th

Topic - Impact of Global Brands on Local Cultures: Homogenization or Enrichment?

● Round 1 - Opening Statements: Each team presents their opening statements.

● Round 2 - Rebuttals: Teams counter each other's arguments and present rebuttals.
● Round 3 - Cross-Examination: Allow teams to cross-examine each other, promoting critical thinking and on-the-spot responses.
● Round 4 - Closing Statements: Teams make their final statements, summarizing their arguments and emphasising key points.

Reference links:
https://www.marketingweek.com/concern-about-the-effects-of-global-brands/

https://archive.researchworld.com/global-brands-local-cultures/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
337900365_How_global_brands_incorporate_local_cultural_elements_to_improve_brand_evaluations_A_perspective_on_cultural
_mixing

Students to make use of other references and thinking skills also, other than these references above.

Rubrics -
Classroom Debate Rubric
Criteria 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point Total
Points
 Respect for All statements, Statements and Most statements Statements, Statements,
Other Team body language, responses were and responses responses and/or responses
and respectful and used were body language and/or body
responses were appropriate respectful and in were borderline language
respectful and were language, but once appropriate appropriate. Some were
In appropriate or twice body language, but sarcastic remarks consistently not
language language was not there was one respectful
sarcastic remark
Rebuttal All counter- Most counter- Most counter- Some counter Counter-
arguments were arguments were arguments were arguments were arguments
accurate, relevant accurate, relevant, accurate and weak and irrelevant were not
and strong and strong relevant, but accurate
several were and/or relevant
weak
Use of Every major point Every major point Every major point Some points were All points were
Facts/Statistics was well supported was adequately was supported with supported well, not
with supported with facts, statistics others were not supported
several relevant relevant facts, and/or
facts, statistics statistics and/or examples, but the
and/or examples relevance of some
examples was questionable
Understanding The team clearly The team clearly The team seemed The team seemed The team did
of Topic understood the topic understood the topic to understand the to understand the not
in depth and in depth and main points of the main points of the show an
presented their presented their topic and topic, but didn’t adequate
information information with presented those present with ease understanding
forcefully and ease with ease of
convincingly the topic
Total Points:
Comments: