Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Co2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel - From Mechanistic To Empirical Modelling
Co2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel - From Mechanistic To Empirical Modelling
Co2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel - From Mechanistic To Empirical Modelling
net/publication/274333504
CITATIONS READS
33 2,108
3 authors, including:
Miran Vrhovac
ISQ
10 PUBLICATIONS 156 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Miran Vrhovac on 13 January 2019.
SrdjanNe5ic
Departmentof MechanicalEngineering
University of QueensIand
Brisbane,Qld 4072,Australia
JohnPostlethwaite
Departmentof Chemical Engineering
Univer si ty of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon,CanadaS7N0W0
Miran Vrhovac
Research,Developmentand TrainingDepartment
ISQ - Instituto de Soldadurae Qualidade
PortugueseWelding Institute
8N249 - Km 3, Cabanas- Laido, TagusPark
Apartado II9, 2781Oeiras- Codex,Portugal
ABSTRACT
Many different modelsfor COz corrosion are usedby engineersin the oil
and gas industry. Someare describedin the open literature and only those
are coveredby this review.In orderto classiSthe COzcorrosionmodels,we
have arbitrarily decidedto group them into three categoriesbasedon how
firrnly they are gfounded in theory: mechanistic, semi-empirical and
empirical models.A few most representative examplesare discussedfrom
each gtoup. The performanceof four different models covering all three
groupsis testedby comparingthe predictionswith a large experimentalCO2
corrosiondatabase.
KEYWORDS
review,COzcolTosion,model,experiments,carbonsteel,neuralnetwork
2rl
Vol. 15,No.s.l-2, 1997 CO 2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Afechani.smto Empirical Modelling
INTRODUCTION
UNDERSTAIIDTNGOF CO2CORROSTON
Anodic Reaction
2t2
S. Neiib, J. Po.stlethwaite snd M. Vrhovac Corro.sion Reviev,s
Fe+HrOeFeOH +Hn +e
2t3
VoL 15,Nos.I-2, 1997 CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Mechanism to Empirical Modelling
where for:
Pco2<I0-2bar + a z : 0
!0''< pcor< Ibar :+ a z = l
Pcor> | bar oz= 0
*
The Tafel slopebois shownfor roomtemperatue(22"C).
2r4
S. Neitt, J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corrosion Reviews
Fe+COre Fe,
Fer+HrOeFerOHou+H*+e (s)
rds
FeroH"u , FeroHj, + e
FerOH)u + HrO e Fer(OH)r"u + H*
re r(Oa)ro,t € Fer(OH),*,
r e , , ( o n ) r , o t + 2 H *e F e 2 *+ C o r + 2 H r o
Cathodic reactions
2H2CO3+2e-
+ Hr+2HCO, (7)
215
Vol. 15,Nos.l-2, 1997 CO 2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Alechanism to Empirical Modelling
L H C O ;+ 2 e - + H r + 2 C O ; (e)
THE MODELS
2t6
S. Ne.3t6,J. Postlelhwaite and M. Vrhovac Corrosiott Reviews
Mechanisticmodels
2t7
Vol. 15.Nos.l-2, 1997 CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
Front Mechanism to Enrpirical Modelling
- 7.96-ry-
logV,o, 5.55 pco,
x l0-3t + 0.67lo1 (10)
t +273
218
S. Neit6, J. Po.stlethwaiteand M. Vrhot,nc Corrosiott Revieu,^s
2t9
Vol. 15,No.v.l-2, 1997 CO2 Corro.sion of Carbon Steel -
From A.lechanismto Empirical Modelling
where the first term reflects the charge transfer controlled current:
_n
h" (r2)
i,, = io'10
= k,,F'
t,1*(n.) (13)
[o. ]
of
and in the caseof HzCO:reductionthe limiting currentis a consequence
a slow COzhydrationstepand canbe found asl2ll:
-
u,co., F . lcor\, . (o rroK oruk{,ru)'
ili^1 (14)
/ - coth(
(1s)
i':irt :;
The corrosion potential nnd ir.r..rls:r1 ,* equaiity:
\-; L.
-;
- 0.,
(r7)
,/
4.
Both the models of Gray et al. 18/ and Nesic et al. ll5l can be criticised
on the grounds that while they described in detail the electrochemical
processes occurring on the metal surface, the treatment of the transport
22,0
S. Ne.'tit, J. Po.rtlethwaite antl M. Vt.hotac Conosion Reviews
. ^t 1 '] (18)
6', = - a I:,2:,-t- D,+l + 9[r, A^ + R
g ariI:;D,c,?-'-'a,I dr\ or| *,-
'-/-
L , _j sourceorsrnk
accumulationJi]JttsuntJueroachemicalreactron
F
) z,c =o
L-,/ t I (1e)
221
V oL 15,Nos l.-2 , 1 9 9 7 CO2 Corrosion of Cat'bon Steel'
Fronr Mechanisnt to Empirical Modellhry
N, = -\i, (20)
(2r)
222
S. Neit6, J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corrosion Reviews
Semi-empiricalmodels
223
VoL 15,Nos.1-2,1997 CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Mechanism to Empirical Modelling
. formationof protectivesurfacefilms,
. presenceofthe hydrocarbonphase,
o presenceof corrosioninhibitors,
. presenceof glycol or methanol,
. condensationin wet gastransport,
o high total pressure,
o multi-phaseflow,
. steelt5'pe,
. corrosionhistorv
224
S, NeSi6,J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corrosiott Reviews
Velocity: Velocity can affect COz corrosion only if the colrosion rate is
under partial or total mass transfer control' (the effect of velocity on
water wetting has alreadybeen discussed).If there are no zurfacefilms
present on the steel surface velocity affects the transport of species
through the masstransferboundarylayer. In the caseof the protective
surfacefilms a high velocity can be responsiblefor their removal or
inhibition of their ggowthoftenleadingto localisedattack.In the rvork of
de Waard and Lotz /18/ the effectof velocity in the absenceof surface
films wasmodelledvia a so-calledresistance model:
- =1 1 1 (23)
V
' c oV
r V
r n,
*
There is onerather exotic casewhere velocity actuallyhas a diflerent effect. When
iron carbide films (which achrally increase the corrosion) are present on the
surfaceof the steel,high velocitiescan lead to their removaland thus decreasethe
corrosionrate.
226
S. Neiit, J. Po.rtlethwaite and M. Vrhot,ac Corrosiott Reviews
227
Vol. 15.Nos.I-2, 1997 CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Mechani,sm to Empirical Modelling
v,",)*o
=l- (24)
l,rn=I-
v,.,) -fu,n
Empirical models
228
S. Ne|ib, J. Postlethwaite and M, Vrhovctc Corrosiotr Review,y
o tn(rico;)
vn . ln(v) P <'o.
€ ra =r J+ + e6:-
0,-r,
'l€
J
pnf f "pH
229
VoL 15,Nos.I-2, 1997 CO2 Corro.sionof Carbon Sl,:el-
Front Mecheni,vm to Enpirical Modellhrg
N e u raNl e tw o rk
l l u t p u t5 l a b
T r a n s f eFr. l
GeneticAlgoritham
230
S. Ne.i;6, J. Po^stlethwaiteand M. Vrhovac Corrosion Reviews
Comparison
23r
VoL 15,Nos.l-2, 1997 CO2 Conosion of Cat"bon Steel -
Front Mechanism to Empirical Modelling
232
S. Neiit, J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corrosion Review.s
100
0
o
80 o
0
o9 o
E I
-oo
o
-? 60 o
0 o
tr o o
0
oo
O 0 o $
rc o ./'
oo oo 'oo
940 8
.o or,o A
o
- $9
o
E to
q) o o o
":s:'
o- o o
Oo
20 oO^.4"
o9 S H E L Lm o d e l
0 20 40 60 80 100
measuredCR / (mm/y)
Fig. 2: Comparison
of the SFIELLmodelwith the KSC2experimental
data.
100
Et
80 Et
tr E ../'
E o
tr
e60
n f
EGr EI
EF
t trO
trrrtr
O
]C tr
-Ftrro t r f t
940
.c) B a-o8s#
io tr
o Po
o- s
20 b fiffi-o I F Em o d e l
0 20 40 60 80 100
measuredCR / (mm/y)
F'ig.3: Comparison
of theIFE modelwith theKSC2experimental
data.
233
V oL 15,Nos l.-2 , 1 9 9 7 CO2 Corcosion of Carbon Steel -
From A4echanisntto Empirical Modelling
Interpolation
Extrapolation
E
tr
e60
t
O
ro
940
.o
E
q)
t-
o-
20 Neuralnetworkmodel
02040 60 80 100
measured CR / (mm/y)
Fig.4: Comparison of the neural network model with the KSC2
experimental data.
A
A
AA
80 6A A
6A
E AA
tr
vou A A
Aa
AA
6A iA
t A
O of,o 4oo
a A
E a
daa aA A
940 A A AAA A
.o
E
a a o^o.oAo1-o A
0)
o- ^ 4oA Aoligiaoef"
20 "ffi"44; ^ EC model
20 40 60 80 100
measuredCR / (mm/Y)
Fig. 5: Comparisonof the EC modelwith the KSC2 experimentaldata.
234
S, NeYib,J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corro.siott Reviews
CONCLUSIONS
235
VoL 15,Nos.I-2, 1997 CO 2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Alechani,wt to Enrpirical Modelling
NOMENCLATIIRE
236
S. Ne\it, J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corrosiort Reviews
Re = pvl/p Reynoldsnumber
t temperature,oC;
T absolutetemperature,K;
v velocity,m/s;
V*, corrosionrate,mm/y;
z charge;
n: E - Erru overpotentiil,V',
p viscosity,kg/(ms);
p density,kg/m3;
'c, time, s,
(, ratio betweenthe thicknessof the masstransfer and chemical
reactionboundarvlaver.
REX'ERENCES
237
VoL 15,Nos.I-2, 1997 CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel -
From Mechanism to Empirical Modelling
238
S. Neiib, J. Postlethwaite and M. Vrhovac Corroston Reviews
240