CHAPTER 4: DESIGN RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Result of Project Development and Implementation

1. 4.1.1 Watershed Delineation of Daet River

The digital elevation model of the Daet river was pre-processed using ArcHydro Toolbox in

delineating the watershed and generating different hydrologic inputs. The pre-processed

elevation map was composed of build walls, fill sinks, flow direction, flow accumulation,

stream definition, stream segmentation, catchment grid delineation, catchment polygon

processing, drainage line processing, and adjoint catchment processing. The pre-

processed DEM was then subjected to river model generation to identify the flow path of

the river and the total number of subbasins. Seventeen subbasins were identified, and a

total drainage area of 9.8151 km2 was generated throughout this process. Show in figure

(what) is the output of pre-processed and generated model of Daet River.

The generated DEM was subjected to basin processing using the Geospatial Hydrologic

Modeling Extension (GEO-HMS) 10.2, another ArcGIS plugin. This procedure generates

the physical parameters at the subbasin level, such as subbasin slope, basin centroids,

and longest flow path (Santos et al., 2021). Show in figure (what) is the output of basin

processing of the study area.

<Title>
 As a final output for watershed delineation and a preparation for the analysis of hydrologic

model, watershed boundaries and the direction of the drainage were identified. Some water

basins were merged to minimize to a reasonable number of river basins for more

straightforward analysis. Show in figure (what) is the final output for HEC-HMS calibration.

2. 4.1.2 Hydrologic Model of Daet River

3. 4.1.3 Hydraulic Model of Daet River

This part presents the outcome of your design development and implementation, including

the prototype, drawings, models, and other design deliverable. Feel free to add subsection as

needed

<Title>
4.2 Result of Tests

This part discusses the result of tests based on the planned tests on design project. Feel

free to add subsections as needed.

4.3 Result of Evaluations

This part presents the result of evaluations done with the intended users and industry

experts/ representatives on the effectiveness and efficiency of the design to address the identified

need. Feel free to add subsections as needed.

4.3 Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement of Design

Given that the designers are located in Metro Manila, while the study area is in Daet

Camarines Norte, the communication between both parties is limited.--------------------

This part presents the challenges that you encountered in the whole design process. It is

also expected that you will be able to identify opportunities for improvement of the design base don

the challenges you encountered. Feel free to add subsections as needed.

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1 Summary

Due to its natural topography, wherein a river passes through, Daet, Camarines Norte, has the

most significant number of barangays affected by flooding in the province. Severe problems in

<Title>
transportation, agriculture, and livelihood are just some of the emerging issues in the town caused

by persistent flooding. There are flood mitigating measures at hand; however, the existing flood

mitigating structures are dysfunctional. This project aims to identify the inundated areas along the

Daet river through hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and simulations to design an advantageous

flood mitigating structure based on their effectiveness, economy, and societal impacts. The ArcGIS

software was utilized to generate the river model system. Then, to calibrate the parameters of the

river, the software HEC-HMS was applied. Lastly, HEC-RAS was used to simulate the inundation

along the river and the flood mitigating structures ---------

5.1 Conclusion

Start your conclusion here.

5.1 Recommendation

The detailed structural design of the flood mitigating structure is recommended for the possibility of

implementation of the project in the area. The details are pertaining to specifics like the number of

rebars, size of the members, and other structural design components while considering the

geographic location and the loads to be carried by the structures. The consideration of return

periods greater than 100 years will prepare the province to sustain the mitigation of inundation if the

possibility of such rainfall occurs.

<Title>
 LIST OF REFERENCES

Larson, G. W., Ellis, D. C., & Rivers, P. C. (1984). Essentials of chemical dependency
counseling. New York: Columbia University Press.

Russo, A. C., & Jiang, H. J. (2006). Hospital stays among patients with diabetes,
2004 (Statistical Brief #17). Retrieved from Agency for Healthcare Research &
Quality: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb17.jsp

Please use APA Style Reference Formats.

<Title>
 APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1. FULL RESEARCH PAPER MANUSCRIPT

<Title>
 APPENDIX 2. AUTHOR DECLARATION FORM

<Title of Research Paper>

1. We confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this paper and there has
been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

2. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there
are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but the ones listed. We further confirm
that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.

3. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property
associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of
publication, with respect to intellectual property.

4. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for publication submission of this
paper. He/she is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions
of revisions and final approval of proofs.

5. We confirm that we have provided an active, correct email address which is accessible to the
Corresponding Author.

Author e-mail Address Signature Date

Name of Author 1 (Corresponding Author)*
Name of Author 2
Name of Author 3
Name of Author 4
Name of Author 5
Name of Author 6
(add rows as needed)**
* Corresponding author is normally the adviser or as agreed by the group.
** Only one faculty author, who is the official adviser, is allowed. Special approval must be sought from the Program
Chair and Dean of the COE if additional faculty member/s will be added as co-author/s. Legal action may be imposed if
violations are committed.

<Title>
 APPENDIX 3. INVENTION DISCLOSURE FORM

<Title>
 APPENDIX 4. NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT

<Title>
 APPENDIX 5. DEIGN CONSTRAINTS MATRIX

<Title>
 APPENDIX 6. TRADEOFFS ANALYSIS MATRIX

<Title>
 APPENDIX 7. TEST CASE MATRIX AND RESULTS

<Title>
 APPENDIX 8. EVALUATION TOOLS AND RESULTS

<Title>
 APPENDIX 9. BILL OF MATERIALS (IF APPLICABLE)

<Title>
 APPENDIX 10. DRAWINGS & MODELS (IF APPLICABLE)

(Add Appendices as needed. Copy-paste the last active appendix,

right click and choose “Update Field” to increment the Appendix number)

<Title>
 CURRICULUM VITAE

<Title>