Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

SEMI – DETAILED LESSON PLAN

Content Standard: The learners understand intersubjective human relations.

Performance Standard: The learners perform activities that demonstrate an

appreciation of the talents of people with disabilities and those from the

underprivileged sector of society.

I. OBJECTIVES

A. Realize that intersubjectivity requires accepting differences and not

imposing on others;

B. Explain that authentic dialogue means accepting others even if they are

different from themselves; and

C. Perform activities that demonstrate an appreciation for talents of a

persons with disabilities.

II. Content:

A. Subject matter: Intersubjectivity


B. References: Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person, textbook, pp.

117- 128

C. Material: Pictures related on the topic, power point presentation and laptop.

III. Procedures

A. Preliminary Activities

- Prayer

- Greetings

-Checking of attendance

B. Motivation

- Show some pictures of people with disabilities.

Author is licensed under


Processing Question:

1. What do you feel when you see a person with disabilities?

2. If you were in their shoes what do you think their struggles in everyday life?

C. Presentation and Discussion

INTERSUBJECTIVITY Originally coined by the philosopher Edmund Husserl

(1859 – 1938) is most simply stated as an interchange of thoughts and feelings,

both conscious and unconscious between two persons or subjects. To understand

intersubjectivity, it is necessary first to define the term subjectivity – the

perception/experience of reality from within one’s perspective (both conscious

and unconscious) for this section, Martins Bubers and Karol Wojtyla’s views will be

used as the main framework in understanding intersubjectivity. Both philosophers

were influenced by their religious background they behave in the notion of

concreate experience both refused to regard the human person as a composite of

some kind of dimensions such as animality and rationality. For both views the

human person is total, not dual.


For Wojtyla, the social dimension is represented by “we relation” and for

Buber the interpersonal is signified by the “I-You relation”

Most of the time we look at our differences and may have labels toward one

another, you can be a “loner” a “party goer” or “easy go lucky”. In our lives

somehow, we have collected and given labels ourselves towards others. Though

we are part of our society we are still different individuals living in this society.

Each of us will have different appearances or points of view, this chapter focuses

on building strength despite our various differences.

On PWDs, there are many categories of PWD or persons with disabilities. To

mention some there are the hearing impaired, diabetic, asthmatic persons. The

process of suspecting, recognizing and identifying the handicap for parents with

PWD will include feelings of shock, sorrow, anger and guilt. Feeling of

impotence/questioning “why me?” some parents turn to religion and consider

“heaven sent blessing in disguise” however, this denies the real implications of

disability.

D. Generalization

Why is it important for you to learn and practice intersubjectivity as a student?

How intersubjectivity helps you relate with another person?


E. Evaluation

Direction: In a 1/4 sheet of paper answer the following questions.

1. He believes that the human person is the one who exists and acts in a conscious

will and self-determination.

a. Martin Buber

b. Pope John Paul II

c. Wojtyla

d. Jean Jacques Rousseau

2. Which of the following statement is true

a. Most people with disabilities cannot work

b. Human person can live on his own without the help of others

c. Everybody deserves to be treated as human being no matter what he/she looks

like

3. The following are perception about persons with disabilities (PWD) except:

a. PWD are people with the same right as what other people does

b. PWD’s are less productive


c. PWD’s can contribute to the economic growth of the society

4. Which of the following is not an example of I-Thou relationship.

a. A little boy helping an old woman carrying her things.

b. A man who pays money in exchange of sexual gratification

c. A granddaughter taking care her grandmother who is physically ill.

5. I-You is fellow member; I it is ___

a. Thing

b. Object

c. Either

6. The human person is not just being in the world but being with others, or being

in the world but being with the following EXCEPT

a. Acceptable

b. Sincerity

c. Rejection

7. A person experiencing an event can be called a/an ____

a. Subject
b. Object

c. Intersubjective

8. What does PWD stands for?

a. People with diet

b. Sincerity and concern to others

c. Bullying

9. Who is the philosopher who defined intersubjectivity as the shared emphatic

interchange both conscious and unconscious of thoughts/feelings between two

persons?

a. Pamela Cooper White

b. Micheal Zank

c. Edmund Husserl

10. Authentic dialogue is also a means of ____ other people

a. Accepting the differences

b. Neglecting the uniqueness

c. Complaining dissimilarities
d. Tolerating Immortality

II. Ask the students to share their own experiences in meeting people with

disabilities, how they manage their actuations and in making their decisions.

ASSIGNMENT

Direction: Write an essay about your own experiences in meeting people with

disabilities, how they manage their actuations and in making their decisions.

Prepared By:

Karen O. Villanueva

Approved By:

John Lloyd C. Acojedo

You might also like