Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pharmacologic Manipulation of Fertility: Applied Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Pharmacologic Manipulation of Fertility: Applied Pharmacology and Therapeutics
20
Pharmacologic Manipulation
of Fertility
BASIC PHYSIOLOGY/ENDOCRINOLOGY
Veterinary Clinics o/North America: Food Animal Practice-Vol. 8, No.1, March 1992 57
58 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
II
luteolysis
Preovulatory surge
of LH (and FSH)
"0
o
o
:0
.~
C/)
Q)
"
C
o Estradiol
E
o
I LH
Estradiol
--------------,----' Progesterone
Progesterone
/ \
LH
/
Estradiol
,,-/
stage of the cycle, the frequency of LH pulses is low (6-8 pulses/24 h),
reflecting the inhibitory effect of ovarian steroids, particularly progesterone,
on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Commencing at luteal regression, the fre-
quency of LH pulses increases (20-30/24 h), causing maturation of the preo-
vulatory follicle, which in turn produces increased secretion of estrogens and
inhibin. Estrogens act on the progesterone-primed brain to elicit estrous be-
havior and on the hypothalamic-pituitary unit to stimulate (estrogen positive
feedback) the surge release ofLH (preovulatory surge). This LH surge, occur-
ring around the start of estrus and lasting 8 to 10 hours, results in ovulation
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 59
some 24 to 30 hours later, leading to the formation of the corpus luteum. The
corpus luteum secretes progesterone. On day 3 (day 0 = day of estrus), plasma
progesterone concentrations are low (around 1 ng/mL), rise to 6 to 10 ng/mL
from day 7 to 18, and then at luteolysis decrease over 24 to 36 hours.
Plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations fall during
proestrus as a result of increasing concentrations of estrogen and inhibin se-
creted by the maturing follicle. Inhibin is a glycoprotein hormone, secreted by
the follicle (granulosa cells), that acts at the pituitary to inhibit the secretion of
FSH. FSH is first released in a surge mode associated with the LH surge and
again in a smaller surge approximately 24 hours later.
Prostaglandin F2a secreted by the uterus results in the regression of the
corpus luteum (luteolysis) over 24 to 36 hours. The secretion of prostaglandin
F2a from the uterus involves the interaction of estradiol from ovarian follicles
and progesterone and oxytocin from the corpus luteum. 44,82 Progesterone ac-
tion on the uterus is required for the production of prostaglandin F2a. Estro-
gens stimulate the formation of uterine receptors for estradiol and oxytocin.
Oxytocin from the ovary stimulates release of prostaglandin F2a, which in turn
stimulates further secretion of ovarian oxytocin. However, the time clock-
the mechanism(s) timing the duration of the cycle through timing the initiation
of luteolysis - has not been defined.
Recent longitudinal studies of the growth and development of ovarian
follicles using ultrasound techniques,52,53.83.153,183,184,198 have extended earlier
findings based on postmortem examination of ovaries 201 and on estradiol secre-
tion by the ovary.68 During the estrous cycle and into early pregnancy, there
are waves of follicular growth. A number of follicles are "recruited" and
increase in size over a few days. One is selected, becomes dominant (domi-
nance phase), and further increases in size; the other recruited (subordinate)
follicles become atretic. If the dominant follicle is exposed to proestrous fre-
quencies of plasma LH pulses, it matures and ovulates. Dominant nonovulatory
follicles become atretic. The number of follicular waves per cycle ranges from
one to four and is most commonly two or three. The duration of growth of the
dominant follicle is roughly 4 to 6 days. In heifers with two follicular waves per
cycle, the waves commenced at day 0 (day of ovulation) and on day 9. For the
first (nonovulatory) dominant follicle, the growth phase was 6 days, followed
by a static phase of 6 days, and then a regressing phase. 52,74 In heifers with
three follicular waves, dominant follicles of each wave reached a maximum size
around days 6, 16, and 21 of the cycle; in cows, maximum size was reached
around days 8, 18, and 24, reflecting a slower rate of follicular growth in
COWS. 183 ,184 Cycle lengths are influenced by the age of the cow and the number
of follicular waves. Cycles are longer in cows than in heifers, and three-wave
cycles are longer than two-wave cycles. Thus, cycle lengths for cows with two
and three waves and for heifers with two or three waves were 22.2, 24, 20.5,
and 20.5 days, respectivelyl83,184 The waves of follicular growth and atresia
continue up to day 70 of pregnancy.54,183 Studies at later stages have not been
reported. Plasma estradiol concentrations increase during diestrus in associa-
tion with maturing of the dominant follicles. 68
After conception the maintenance of pregnancy requires progesterone
from the corpus luteum; therefore, a suppression of luteolysis and continuing
estrous cycles is necessary. Thus, if conception occurs, pregnancy maintenance
requires the cow to recognize she is pregnant (maternal recognition of preg-
nancy). The maternal recognition of pregnancy involves the suppression of
secretion of prostaglandin from the uterus. Maternal recognition of pregnancy
occurs 15 to 17 days after ovulation, and embryo-produced proteins such as
bovine trophoblast protein 1 (bTP-l) are involved. Recent studies indicate that
60 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
the antiluteolytic effect of the embryo results from bTP-1 causing increased
activity of an endometrium prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor, leading to re-
duced secretion of prostaglandin F2a. 61 ,208,210 Other changes in endocrine func-
tion that probably are not related to trophoblast protein-1 have been described
in early pregnancy in ewes and cows. Pregnant animals had higher concentra-
tions of plasma progesterone and lower concentrations of plasma estradiol,
uterine oxytocin receptors, and luteal oxytocin than nonpregnant ani-
mals. 43 ,60,85,187
Pregnancy
Progesterone is required throughout pregnancy (duration of 280 days-
range of270-292 days). The main source of progesterone is the ovary; second-
ary sources are the placenta and adrenal gland. In the second and third trimes-
ters, the placenta secretes increasing amounts of estrogens. The high
continuous concentrations of progesterone (and estrogens) from the ovary
during pregnancy results in pituitary depletion of LH, probably reflecting
inhibition of secretion of GnRH. GnRH is required for both synthesis and
secretion of pituitary gonadotropins.
Parturition
The initiation of parturition involves increased activity of the fetal hypo-
thalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading to increased concentrations of cortico-
steroids in the fetal blood. Fetal corticosteroids act at the placenta to activate
enzyme systems, resulting in conversion of progestagens to androgens, and
androgens to estrogens. Estrogens stimulate the production of the uterine
prostaglandin F2a and increase the number of uterine oxytocin receptors. The
secretion of prostaglandin F2a is also stimulated by oxytocin. Oxytocin is se-
creted from the posterior pituitary in response to the fetus entering the birth
canal. Uterine contractility is stimulated by prostaglandins and oxytocin. Pros-
taglandin F2a also causes the luteolysis of the corpus luteum of pregnancy.
Softening of the cervix and relaxation of the sacrosciatic ligaments and the birth
canal involve progesterone withdrawal, estrogens, and prostaglandins. The role
of relaxin from the ovary is unclear. 71
Anestrus
A period of anestrus, reflecting ovarian acyclicity, occurs in cows post
partum. Reported intervals from parturition to first estrus are 30 to 76 days for
dairy cattle and 40 to 48 days for beef cattle. First ovulations commonly occur
in dairy cattle by around 2 to 4 weeks post partum. 102,132,170 The first ovulation
post partum may not be accompanied by estrus, and this seems more common
in dairy cattle, which ovulate sooner post partum, than do beef cattle. 182,196 The
lack of estrus probably reflects a lack of progesterone sensitization of the brain
to the estrous-inducing effects of estradiol. 127 The first ovulation often results
in a short-lived corpus luteum, leading to a short interestrous or interovulatory
interval of around 8 to 10 days.50,116,144,162,183,189 These short cycles are noted as
a cause of infertility in beef and dairy cows owing to regression of the corpus
luteum before maternal recognition of pregnancy. 114,144
The basic mechanisms associated with ovarian acyclicity in the post-par-
tum period have been reviewed,141,196 and studies of growth of ovarian follicles
using an ultrasound technique have been reported. 159,182
The major factors limiting the onset of ovarian cyclicity post partum are (1)
an inadequate frequency of the pulsatile secretion of LH necessary for the final
stages of follicular development and maturation (similar to secretion during
proestrus), and (2) an inadequate surge release of LH (preovulatory surge) in
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 61
response to increasing concentrations of estradiol acting on the hypothalamic-
pituitary axis (estrogen positive feedback). Inadequate secretion of LH early
post partum (10-20 days) initially reflects reduced function of the hypotha-
lamic-pituitary axis and subsequently reflects increased sensitivity of the hypo-
thalamic-pituitary axis to the inhibitory effects of estradiol on LH secretion
(estrogen negative feedback).196 Plasma FSH concentrations are not limiting,
because they are at normal levels shortly after parturition. 86,196
Early (up to 2-5 weeks) in the post-partum period, CnRH is secreted at
low frequency (3-6 pulses/24 h) and is sufficient to replenish pituitary LH
stores depleted during pregnancy. Subsequently, the frequency of CnRH
pulses and, consequently, of plasma LH pulses increases, resulting in the devel-
opment of ovarian follicles, which, in turn, secrete estradiol and inhibin. Estra-
diol stimulates the production of estradiol receptors in the pituitary and hypo-
thalamus, which is necessary for estrogen-positive feedback. Finally, a further
increase in plasma LH pulse frequency (similar to that in proestrus) stimulates
follicular maturation and increased estradiol production, which in turn induces
a plasma LH surge and ovulation.
Studies using ultrasonographic technique in lactating dairy cows show that
early in the post-partum period, there is growth and regression of small «4
mm) and medium-sized (5 - 9 mm) follicles. This is associated with a frequency
of plasma LH pulses of 8 to 12 per 24 hours. Subsequently, a dominant follicle
(> 10 mm) is detected associated with a plasma LH pulse frequency of 20 to 28
per 24 hours.) This follicle usually ovulates (without estrus) after approxi-
mately 3 to 5 days or becomes cystic and persists.
The ovulatory cycles commencing early post partum « 10 days) are of
either normal or long duration (18-24, > 24 days), but those commencing later
(> 20 days post partum) are of short duration (9 -13 days). Between 10 and 20
days post partum, long, normal, and short cycles are observed. 183 The basis for
short cycles is unclear but may reflect a need for progesterone priming of
ovarian follicles for subsequent normal luteal function. Pretreatment with pro-
gesterone results in normal luteal function in early post-partum cycles in beef
COWS. 67 ,160,196,200 In the studies cited previously using an ultrasonographic tech-
nique, it is suggested that the normal length of cycles occurring early post
partum reflect a priming effect of progesterone of pregnancy, whereas for
cycles commencing later post partum, there is no such priming effect and
therefore the cycles are of short duration. 183
Factors Affecting the Duration of Ovarian Acyclicity Post Partum
Factors affecting the duration of ovarian acyclicity post partum include
nutrient status, suckling, season, presence of bulls, and genotype. 148,161,196
Nutrient Status. Reduced nutrient status increases the interval from partu-
rition to first ovulation or estrus. The complexity of the relationship between
nutrient status and reproductive function has been outlined and re-
viewed. 161 ,195 Nutrient status or balance reflects nutrient reserves and intake
and the requirements for basic metabolism, growth, lactation, and activity.
Reduced nutrient status is associated with lower plasma concentrations of LH
and estradiol, delayed follicular development, and a delay in the occurrence of
or decrease in the magnitude of the estradiol-induced plasma LH surge. The
low plasma LH concentrations reflect an increased sensitivity of the hypotha-
lamic-pituitary axis to the inhibitory effects of estradiol (as also described in the
ewe 226) (estrogen negative feedback) and an ovarian steroid-independent re-
duction in secretion of LH by the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. 65 Blood glucose
concentrations are suggested to be the factor linking nutrient status with re-
productive function at the level of the hypothalamus. 195
62 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
HEIGHT OF ESTRUS
OVARIAN CYCLICITY
TIME POST PARTUM EARLY POST PARTUM
NUTRIENT DEFICIENCY
NUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTATION
SUCKLING
PHOTOPERIOD (STIMULATORy)
! responsiveness to
treatments to induce
ovulation /estrus
decreasing
DEPTH OF ANESTRUS
Figure 2. Factors affecting the depth of anestrus in cows (individual or groups). The
depth of anestrus is a concept to describe the responsiveness of animals to measures to
induce ovarian cyclicity. Animals in shallow anestrus are more responsive than animals in
deep anestrus. The basic mechanisms involved with the depth of anestrus in acyclic
animals may also vary in cyclic animals, resulting in the heights of estrus.
64 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
PHARMACOLOGIC AGENTS
INDUCTION OF ESTRUS
SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS
The main indications for the synchronization of estrus (and ovulation) are
to facilitate artificial insemination in cows that are not handled intensively
(beef cows, dairy heifers), to maximize the number of cows inseminated close
to mating start date in seasonally producing dairy herds, to limit periods of
close observation and insemination to discrete periods in nonseasonal dairy
herds, and to facilitate embryo transfer programs.
Theoretical and practical aspects of estrous synchronization have been
reviewed recently.57,79,143,166,176 Procedures to synchronize estrus and ovula-
tion in cyclic animals are based on synchronizing the end of the progestational
phase and therefore the start of proestrus (estrogenic or follicular phase).
Variability in the time required for follicular maturation and ovulation can
result in a spread of estrus and ovulation over 5 to 6 days. This variability
reflects the stage of the follicular wave at the onset of proestrus. Heifers may
enter estrus sooner (average-12 h) than cows,18,143,166 which probably re-
flects that a shorter time is needed for follicles to mature,183,184 although this
effect was not seen in heifers receiving one treatment of prostaglandin (Table
2). Fixed-time insemination results in somewhat lower fertility rates than in-
semination according to observed estrus.
The end of the progestational phase can be synchronized using prostaglan-
din or progestagen treatment. Prostaglandin F2a or analogs terminate the
progestational phase by causing luteal regression, which occurs over 24
hours.105 Progestagens administered over time permit the natural occurrence
of luteal regression, and the progestational phase is terminated by cessation of
treatment. Progestagen treatment suppresses the frequency of plasma LH
pulses so that final follicular maturation and ovulation do not occur. Luteal
phase concentrations of plasma progesterone permit follicular waves to
occur.199 Plasma progesterone concentrations lower than those of luteal phase
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 69
Table 1. Hormone Preparations Used for the Pharmacologic
Manipulation of Fertility
PREPARATION RELEVANT ACTION APPLICATION
TREATMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6
2 treatments 12 days apart (heifers) (80) 0 20 45 20 5 10
1 treatment on day 7 (100) 0 0 72 9 6 13
1 treatment on day 12 (100) 0 0 23 37 30 10
1 treatment on day 16 (100) 0 0 79 10 6 5
treatments on days 7 -16 (100) 0 0 51 22 13 14
Heifers 1 treatment (100) (data set 1) 0 0 61 10 7.5 21.4
(data set 2) 0 0 47.1 39.7 7.0 6.2
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 71
artificial). Management aspects include the urgency to get cows pregnant and
the desirability of a short calving period. Recommended times for fixed-time
inseminations are 72 to 80 hours or 72 and 96 hours after treatment; perhaps
12 hours earlier for heifers.
The protocols include (1) administration of prostaglandins twice to all cows
11 to 12 days apart, and insemination only after second treatment. Synchrony
is better than with one injection, because most cows are at a similar stage of
diestrus (days 6 - 9) at the second treatment, but there may be some failure of
luteal regression. (2) Administration of two treatments: insemination of cows
responding to the first, treatment of the others any time after day 6 to 12, and
insemination when in estrus. (3) Insemination of all cows at naturally occurring
estrus over 6 days, treatment of the rest on day 6, and insemination when in
estrus. This permits assessment of the degree of cyclicity in the herd and of the
accuracy of estrous detection before major costs are incurred. Within the first 5
days, 20% to 25% of cows should show estrus. (4) Give one treatment only:
70% to 75% randomly cycling animals should be in estrus within 5 days. (5)
The objective of the "Why Wait" system is to inseminate as many cows as
possible in a 10-day period, commencing at mating start date (MSD) (day 0) in a
seasonally producing dairy herd. Heat detection starts 11 days before MSD.
Cows in heat on days -11 to -6 are given prostaglandin on MSD. Cows in heat
on days -6 to 1 are given prostaglandin on day 6. Cows are inseminated at
observed estrus.
Progestagen Treatment
Important points relating to progestagen treatment are
1. Long-term treatment (14-20 days) results in lower fertility at the first
synchronized estrus than for control animals. Suggested reasons include inade-
quate sperm transport, disordered hormone secretion or patterns of follicular
development, and retarded embryo development. 143
2. Treatment for periods shorter than an estrous cycle length (e.g., 14-21
days) are effective because animals treated during proestrus and estrus do not
ovulate or form a corpus luteum, and animals treated in metestrus have early
luteal regression.
3. Treatment periods of 14 days or less (to 7 days) require the use of a
luteolytic agent to ensure no functional corpora lutea at the end of treatment.
An estradiol ester may be administered at the start of treatment, or prostaglan-
din treatment can be given the day before or at the end of progestagen treat-
ment. Better synchrony occurs if prostaglandin is given the day before so that
endogenous progesterone does not extend the progestational phase for some
cows past the time of withdrawal of exogenous progestagen. Prostaglandin
treatment may be more reliable than estrogen treatment to ensure luteal
regression.
4. It is suggested that for optimal fertility, high (luteal phase) plasma
progesterone concentrations should be maintained for the duration of treat-
ment. 175,176 Failure so to do may result in persistence of a dominant follicle and
suppression of a follicular wave. 99,199 This follicle undergoes final maturation
promptly at progestagen withdrawal, resulting in early and good synchrony of
estrus but reduced fertility due to aged ova, resulting in embryo loss. Short-
term treatments (7 - 9 days) commencing in the second half of the cycle re-
sulted in lower pregnancy rates than treatment commencing early in the cycle.
These treatments involved feeding MGA for 7 days and prostaglandin injection
on the last day of feeding,10,145 or Syncromate-B treatment,17 The reduced
fertility could have reflected lower plasma progesterone concentrations owing
72 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
SUPEROVULATION
Basic Aspects
Much remains to be learned concerning the mechanisms controlling the
waves of follicular growth, follicular recruitment, selection of the dominant
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 73
follicle, and follicular atresia that occur during the estrous cycle and early
pregnancy. Currently, it is believed that FSH is required to stimulate growth
and development of small follicles and that the effects of FSH are modulated in
the ovary by autocrine and paracrine factors (for example, inhibin, insulin-like
growth factor, follicle regulatory protein, transforming growth factor) that
control ovarian growth, atresia, and selection of the dominant follicle. 68 ,186 The
induction of superovulation using exogenous gonadotrophins (FSH, PMSG)
overrides these intraovarian controlling mechanisms, resulting in reductions in
both follicular atresia and the selection of increased numbers of dominant
follicles. 123,130
Practical Aspects
Practical aspects of the induction of superovulation have been re-
viewed. 57,117 The hormones commonly used to induce superovulation are FSH
of pituitary origin or PMSG. Preparations derived from the urine of meno-
pausal women (human menopausal gonadotropin [HMG]) have also been
used3,121 and had effects similar to FSH of pituitary origin. Comparisons of
results for FSH and PMSG treatments show equivocal results, with the effects
of the two preparations being similar, 29,129 or better responses being obtained
with FSH5,40 or with PMSG.228
A feature of all treatments is the variability in ovarian responsiveness.
Some variability can be associated with nutrient status, breed, and strain;
however, much variability occurs within similar groups of animals. Major re-
ductions in this variability will require new approaches to treatment based on
understanding of the mechanisms controlling follicular growth and atresia, and
the selection of dominant follicles. Over a number of studies using various
gonadotropin preparations, the range of mean responses (each with a large
standard error) were 6 to 33 corpora lutea; 3 to 27 ova/embryos recovered; and
2.5 to 11 transferable embryos.29,34,56,96,121,180,181
Treatment involves the administration of FSH or PMSG commencing mid-
diestrus (days 8 - 14 of the cycle) and the administration 2 days later of prosta-
glandin to cause luteolysis and the start of proestrus. Treatment early or later in
the cycle results in poorer responses. 58,185 A single injection of PMSG (long
half-life) or twice-daily injections of FSH (shorter half-life) on successive days
are required (Table 3). FSH given twice daily at a constant dose (5 mg) yielded
similar results to the reducing dose rate regimen. 32 The induced luteolysis is
followed by patterns of hormone secretion similar to those in a normal cycle,
but estrus and the LH surge occur sooner after prostaglandin (around 48 h)
than for a normal cycle (around 72 h).12.20 Plasma estrogen concentrations and
the time to the onset of the LH surge are proportional and inversely propor-
tional, respectively, to the numbers of follicles that develop. 12 Treatments with
gonadotropins cease at estrus, and because ovulation occurs over 24 hours,
twice daily inseminations commencing 12 hours after estrus onset are recom-
mended. Cows coming into estrus early usually have good superovulatory
response and embryo recovery, those with late estrus have poor responses.
Recipients receive prostaglandin 24 hours before the donor cows (on day 2).
Nonsurgical embryo collection is performed on days 6 to 8 after the onset of
estrus.
In terms of ovulation rate and numbers of transferable embryos, the re-
sponse to PMSG treatment can be improved by treatment with anti-PMSG
serum at estrus or after the preovulatory LH surge. 28 ,29,180 This treatment
results in suppression of formation of a second wave of follicles. There are
fewer follicular cysts, and the period of ovulation is shorter than for PMSG-
treated cows not receiving antiserum. OfPMSG-treated cows, 10% to 15% fail
to show an LH surge.1 2,29,178
The response to treatment with FSH is affected by the amount of LH in the
preparation. Reduction of LH content results in better responses in terms of
fertilization rate and proportion of transferable embryos.19..34,35 It is considered
that LH in the FSH preparation interferes with normal follicle and oocyte
development. 19,33,34 The LH activity in PMSG preparations can vary widely, 139
but it is not clear whether this variation can affect results. Batches of PMSG
examined by others showed no significant variability in LH activity, 4 and there
was no batch effect on responses. The reduced efficacy of high doses of gonado-
tropin preparations may reSect increasing LH activity. High doses of PMSG are
associated with reduced ovulation rates. 179 High doses of FSH-P and HMG are
associated with reduced fertilization rates. 121 ,146 High doses of an FSH prepara-
tion of low LH content (Folltropin) showed no reduction in efficacy.56
The administration of GnRH or HCG applied generally at the time of
estrus does not produce a consistent improvement in response 46 ,155,181,214,227
but may be helpful if delayed ovulation is suspected. Recent studies have
shown that ovulatory response was not improved by giving a small dose of
FSH-P early (day 2) in the cycle before the main treatments,167 and it was
suggested that the improvement reported in another study158 may have been
associated with the poor ovulatory responses in that group of animals.
Applied Aspects
The clinical aspects of the induction of abortion and parturition have been
well reviewed. 7,8,218,219 Indications for the induction of abortion and parturition
include animals entering feedlots, inappropriate matings, pathologic preg-
nancy, and late-to-calve cows in seasonal pasture-based dairy areas. Late calv-
ing cows at mating start date are less likely to have commenced estrous cycles
and are likely to have lower conception rates than early calving cows. The aim
is for calving to have occurred by 40 days before the mating start date.
Induction of Abortion. Up to 3 months of gestation, a luteolytic dose of
prostaglandin F2a or analog causes abortion in most animals within 5 to 10
days. Prostaglandin given between 3 and 5 months causes abortion in most
animals but is somewhat less reliable. After 5 months of gestation, prostaglan-
din plus corticosteroid (25 mg dexamethasone) reliably causes abortion (2-10
days after treatment) in most animals. In animals more than 6 months pregnant,
a single injection of long-acting corticosteroid causes abortion in most animals.
In cows more than 4 months pregnant, placentae usually are retained. Abortion
failure may be associated with failure of luteal regression and with fetal mum-
mification. Estrogens administered in large doses, repeated if necessary, are
less reliable.
Induction of Parturition. Calves born up to 2 weeks before term have good
viability; those born more than 3 weeks before term have low viability. Placen-
tal retention is commonly associated with premature parturition, and its inci-
dence reHects the degree of prematurity.
Short-acting corticosteroids result in parturition in 24 to 72 hours in 80%
to 90% of cows treated within 2 weeks of their expected calving date. Retained
placentae are common, and calf viability is excellent. The incidence of retained
placentae is not reduced by the administration of estrogens 13 or prostaglan-
dins. 37,92 Treatments involving both corticosteroids and prostaglandins may
result in increased responsiveness and a shorter time (36 h) to delivery.92
Long-acting corticosteroids may be administered up to 3 months prior to
the expected calving date and result in parturition 2 to 3 weeks after treatment.
The time of calving is much more variable than with short-acting corticoste-
roids, and the incidence of retained fetal membranes lower and calf mortality is
higher. Calf mortality increases as the degree of prematurity of the induced calf
increases. Calf mortality is associated with premature placental detachment.
Short-acting corticosteroids or prostaglandins administered 7 to 12 days after a
long-acting corticosteroid result in calving 2 to 3 days later. Prostaglandin
treatment gives a similar response to short-acting corticosteroids, with parturi-
tion occurring 24 to 72 hours after treatment. We have found butterfat produc-
tion in cows induced with long-acting corticosteroids at longer than 6 months
of gestation to be around 96% that of control cows calving naturally. In our
seasonally producing area, failure to induce calving in potentially late calving
cows results in a loss in production as a result of a shorter lactation period in
late calving cows than in cows calving at the normal time. All cows in the herd
are dried off at the same time (mid-winter).
SUMMARY
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES
1. Acosta B, Tarnavsky TE, Platt TE, et al: Nursing enhances the negative effect of
estrogen on LH release in the cow. J Anim Sci 57:1530, 1983
2. Alberio RH, Schiersmann G, Carou N, et al: Effect of a teaser bull on ovarian and
behavioural activity of suckling beef cows. Anim Reprod Sci 14:263, 1987
3. Alcivar AA, Maurer RR, Anderson LL: Superovulary responses in FSH- or Per-
gonal(R)-treated heifers. Theriogenology 22:635, 1984
4. Allen WR, Stewart F: The biology of pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG).
In Sreenan JR (ed): Control of Reproduction in the Cow. The Hague, Martinus
Nijhoff, 1978, p 50
5. Almeida AP: Superovulation in cattle: A combined treatment using Syncromate B
with either pregnant mare serum gonadotropin or follicle stimulating hormone.
Theriogenology 27:329, 1987
80 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
55. Gomes WR, Erb BE: Progesterone in bovine reproduction. J Dairy Sci 48:314,
1965
56. Gonzalez A, Lussier JG, Carruthers TD, et al: Superovulation in beef heifers with
Folltropin: A new FSH preparation containing reduced LH activity. Theriogeno-
logy 33:519, 1990
57. Gordon I: Controlled Breeding in Farm Animals. Oxford, UK, Pergamon, 1983
58. Goulding D, Williams DH, Duffy P, et al: Superovulation in heifers given FSH
initiated at either day 2 or day 10 of the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 34:767,
1990
59. Hansel W, Convey EM: Physiology of the estrous cycle. J Anim Sci 57:404, 1983
60. Hansel W, Stock A, Battista PJ: Low molecular weight lipid-soluble luteotrophic
factor(s) produced by conceptuses in cows. J Reprod Fert Suppl 37:11, 1989
61. Heap RB, Rider V, Wooding FBP, et al: Molecular and cellular signaling and
embryonic survival. In Sreenan JM, Diskin MG (eds): Embryonic Mortality in
Farm Animals. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff 1986, p 46
62. Hunter MG, Southee JA, McLeod BJ, et al: Progesterone pretreatment has a direct
effect on GnRH induced preovulatory follicles to determine their ability to
develop into normal corpora lute a in anoestrous ewes. J Reprod Fert 76:349,
1986
63. Hyland JH, Wright pJ, Clarke IJ, et al: Infusion of gonadotrophin releasing hor-
mone (GnRH) induces ovulation and fertile oestrus in mares during seasonal
anoestrus. J Reprod Fert Suppl 35:211, 1987
64. Ijaz A, Fahning ML, Zemjanis R: Treatment and control of cystic ovarian disease in
dairy cattle: A review. Br Vet J 143:226, 1987
65. Imakawa K, Day ML, Zalesky DD, et al: Effects of 17beta-estradiol and diets
varying in energy on secretion of luteinizing hormone in beef heifers. J Anim Sci
64:805, 1987
66. Imori T: Biological half life of progesterone in the peripheral blood of cows. Jpn J
Vet Sci 29:201, 1967
67. Inskeep EK, Braden TD, Lewis PE, et al: Receptors for luteinizing hormone and
follicle-stimulating hormone in largest follicles of postpartum beef cows. BioI
Reprod 38:587, 1988
68. Ireland JJ, Roche JF: Hypotheses regarding development of dominant follicles
during a bovine estrous cycle. In Roche JF, O'Callaghan D (eds): Follicular
Growth and Ovulation Rate in Farm Animals. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Martinus
Nijhoff, 1987, p 1
69. Jackson PS, Johnson CT, Furr BJ, et al: Influence of stage of oestrus cycle on time of
oestrus following cloprostenol treatment in the bovine. Theriogenology 12:153,
1979
70. Jagger JP, Peters AR, Lamming GE: Hormone responses to low-dose GnRH treat-
ment in post-partum beef cows. J Reprod Fert 80:263, 1987
71. Janszen BPM, Bevers MM, Dieleman SJ, et al: Synchronized calvings after with-
drawal of norgestomet implants from cows treated near term with prostaglandin.
Vet Rec 127:405, 1990
72. Jubb TF, Abhayaratne D, Malmo J, et al: Failure of an intramuscular injection of an
analogue of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone 11 to 13 days after insemination
to increase pregnancy rates in cattle. Aust Vet J 67:359, 1990
73. Jubb TF, Brightling P, Malmo J, et al: Evaluation of a regimen using a progesterone
releasing intravaginal device (CIDR) and PMSG as a treatment for postpartum
anoestrus in dairy cattle. Aust Vet J 66:334, 1989
74. Kastelic JP, Knopf L, Ginther OJ: Effect of day of prostaglandin F2a treatment on
selection and development of the ovulatory follicle in heifers. Anim Reprod Sci
23:169, 1990
75. Kesler DJ, Garverick HA: Ovarian cysts in dairy cattle: A review. J Anim Sci
55:1147, 1982
76. King GJ, Saballo A: Ovulations prior to the rebreeding period improve fertility of
beef cows. Proc lOth Int Cong Anim Reprod A I Urbana-Champaign, IL 3:3,
1991
77. King ME, Holland MD, Mauck HS, et al: Synchronization of estrus in beef
cows with norgestomet-alfaprostol or Syncro-Mate B. Theriogenology 30:785,
1988
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 83
78. King ME, Kiracofe GA, Stevenson JS, et al: Effect of stage of the estrous cycle on
interval to estrus after PGF2a in beef cattle. Theriogenology 18:191, 1982
79. Kiracofe G: Estrus synchronization in beef cattle. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet
19:57,1988
80. Kiracofe GH, Keay LE, Odde KG: Synchronization of estrus in cyclic beef heifers
with the prostaglandin analogue Alfaprostol. Theriogenology 27: 737, 1985
81. Knickerbocker n, Drost M, Thatcher WW: Endocrine patterns during the initiation
of puberty, the estrous cycle, pregnancy and parturition in cattle. In Morrow DA
(ed): Current Therapy in Theriogenology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1986, p
117
82. Knickerbocker n, Wiltbank MC, Niswender GD: Mechanisms of luteolysis in do-
mestic livestock. Domest Anim Endocrinol 5:91, 1988
83. KnopfL, Kastelic]p, Schallenberger E, et al: Ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers:
Test of two wave hypothesis by ultrasonically monitoring individual follicles.
Domest Anim Endocrinol 6:111, 1989
84. Kruif A De: Factors inHuencing the fertility of a cattle population. J Reprod Fert
54:507, 1978
85. Lamming GE, Darwash AO, Back HL: Corpus luteum function in dairy cows and
embryo mortality. J Reprod Fert Suppl 37:245, 1989
86. Lamming GE, Wathes DC, Peters AR: Endocrine patterns in the post-partum cow. J
Reprod Fert Suppl 30:155, 1981
87. Lamming GE, McLeod BJ: Continuous infusion ofGnRH reduces the LH response
to an intravenous GnRH injection but does not inhibit endogenous LH secretion
in cows. J Reprod Fert 82:237, 1988
88. Laster DB: Disappearance and uptake of 1125 FSH in rat, rabbit, ewe and cow.
J Reprod Fert 30:407, 1972
89. Lemon M: The effect of oestrogens alone or in association with progestagens on the
formation and regression of the corpus luteum of the cyclic cow. Ann BioI Anim
Biochim Biophys 15:243, 1975
90. Leslie KE: The effects of gonadotrophin releasing hormone administration in early
postpartum dairy cows on hormone concentrations, ovarian activity and repro-
ductive performance: A review. Can Vet J 24:116, 1983
91. Leslie KE, Bosu WTK: Plasma progesterone concentrations in dairy cows with
cystic ovaries and clinical responses following treatment with fenprostalene. Can
Vet J 24:352, 1983
92. Lewing FJ, Proulx J, Mapletoft RJ: Induction of parturition in the cow using
cloprostenol and dexamethasone in combination. Can Vet J 26:317, 1985
93. Lewis GS, Caldwell OW, Rexroad CE, et al: Effects of gonadotropin releasing
hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin on pregnancy rate in dairy cattle. J
Dairy Sci 73:66, 1990
94. Lewis GS, Thatcher WW, Bliss EI, et al: Effects of heat stress during pregnancy on
postpartum reproductive changes in Holstein cows. J Anim Sci 58: 174, 1984
95. Lindell JO, Kindahl H, Jansson L, et al: Postpartum release of prostaglandin F2A
and uterine involution in the cow. Theriogenology 17:237, 1982
96. Lindsell CS, Murphy BD, Mapletoft RJ: Superovulatory and endocrine responses in
heifers treated with FSH-P at different stages of the estrous cycle. Theriogeno-
logy 26:209, 1986
97. Loumaye E, Naor Z, Catt KJ: Binding affinity and biological activity of gonadotro-
phin-releasing hormone agonists in isolated pituitary cells. Endocrinology
111:730, 1982
98. Lucy MC, Stevenson JS, Call EP: Controlling first service and calving interval by
prostaglandin F2alpha, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and timed insemina-
tion. J Dairy Sci 69:2186, 1986
99. Lucy MC, Thatcher WW, Macmillan KL: Ultrasonic identification of follicular
populations and returns to estrus in early postpartum dairy cows given intravagi-
nal progesterone for 15 days. Theriogenology 34:325, 1990
100. Macmillan KL: Prostaglandin responses in dairy herd breeding programmes. N Z
Vet J 31:110, 1983
101. Macmillan KL: Achieving high conception rates in dairy cattle. Proc No 78 Post-
graduate Committee in Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Aus-
tralia, 78:55, 1985
84 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
102. Macmillan KL, Asher GW: Developments in artificial insemination and controlled
breeding in dairy cattle and deer in New Zealand. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod
50:123, 1990
103. Macmillan KL, Clayton DG: Factors influencing the interval to post partum oestrus,
conception date and empty rate in an intensively managed dairy herd. N Z Soc
Anim Prod 40:236, 1980
104. Macmillan KL, Day AM: Prostaglandin F2a: A fertility drug in dairy cattle. Therio-
genology 18:245, 1982
105. Macmillan KL, Day AM, Smith JF: Onset of oestrous and fertility in lactating dairy
cows injected with an analogue of prostaglandin F2a, cloprostenol. Anim Reprod
Sci 3:171, 1980
106. Macmillan KL, Day AM, Taufa VK, et al: Effects of an agonist of gonadotrophin
releasing hormone in cattle: 1. Hormone concentrations and oestrous cycle
length. Anim Reprod Sci 8:203, 1985
107. Macmillan KL, Day AM, Taufa VK, et al: Some effects of injecting a prostaglandin
F2A (Lutalyse) during the post-partum period on subsequent fertility of dairy
cows. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 47:65,1987
108. Macmillan KL, Day AM, Taufa VK, et al: Effects of an agonist of gonadotrophin
releasing hormone in cattle: II. Interactions with injected prostaglandin F2a and
unilateral ovariectomy. Anim Reprod Sci 8:213, 1985
109. Macmillan KL, Henderson HV: Analyses of the variation in the interval from an
injection of prostaglandin F2a to oestrus as a method of studying patterns of
follicle development during dioestrus in diary cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 6:245,
1983
110. Macmillan KL, Peterson AJ: The use of a new intravaginal progesterone device for
oestrous cycle control and synchrony, increasing pregnancy rates in inseminated
animals and cycle initiation in anoestrous dairy cattle. Anim Reprod Sci, in press,
1991
Ill. Macmillan KL, Pickering JGE: Using CIDR type B and PMSG to treat anoestrum in
New Zealand dairy cows. Proc lith Int Cong Anim Reprod A I, Dublin, 4:1988
112. Macmillan KL, Taufa VK, Day AM: Effects of an agonist of gonadotrophin releasing
hormone (Buserelin) in cattle: ill. Pregnancy rates after a post-insemination
injection during metoestrus or dioestrus. Anim Reprod Sci 11:1, 1986
113. Macmillan KL, Thatcher WW, Drost M: Recent developments in animal breeding
programmes. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 49:91,1989
114. Macmillan KL, Watson JD: Short estrous cycles in New Zealand dairy cattle. J
Dairy Sci 54:1526, 1971
115. Madej A, Kindahl H, Woyno W, et al: Blood levels of 15-keto-13, 14-dihydro-pros-
taglandin F22 during the post-partum period in primparous cows. Theriogeno-
logy 21:279, 1984
116. Manns JG, Humphrey WO, Flood PF, et al: Endocrine profiles and functional
characteristic of corpora lutea following onset of postpartum ovarian activity in
beef cows. Can J Anim Sci 63:331, 1983
117. Mapletoft RJ: Bovine embryo transfer. In Morrow DA (ed): Current Therapy in
Theriogenology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1986, p 54
118. Martin GB, Scaramuzzi RJ, Lindsay R: Effect of introduction of rams during anoes-
trus on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomised ewes. J Reprod Fert
67:47, 1983
119. Martin GB, Thomas GB: Roles of communication between the hypothalamus, pitui-
tary gland and ovary in the breeding activity of ewes. In Oldham CM, Martin GB,
Purvis IW (eds): Reproductive Physiology of Merino Sheep: Concepts and Con-
sequences. Perth, School of Agriculture (Animal Science), The University of
Western Australia, 1990, p 23
120. McClary DG, Putnam WR, Wright JC, et al: Effect of early post-partum treatment
with prostaglandin F2a on subsequent fertility in the dairy cow. Theriogenology
31:565, 1989
121. McGowan MR, Braithwaite M, Jochle W, et al: Superovulation of beef heifers with
Pergonal (HMG): a dose response trial. Theriogenology 24: 1 73, 1985
122. McLeod BJ, Haresign W, Lammh GE: Induction of ovulation in seasonally anoes-
trous ewes by continuous infusion of low doses of GnRH. J Reprod Fert 68:489,
1983
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 85
123. McNatty KP, Gibb M, Dobson C, et al: Preovulatory follicular development
in sheep treated with PMSG and/or prostaglandin. J Reprod Fert 65:111,
1982
124. McNatty KP, Hudson N, Gibb M, et al: Seasonal differences in ovarian activity in
cows. J Endocrinol 102:189, 1984
125 . McVey WR, Williams GL: Effects of temporary calf removal and osmotic pump
delivery of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on synchronized estrus, conception
to a timed artificial insemination and gonadotropin secretion in norgestomet-es-
tradiol valerate-treated cattle. Theriogenology 32:969, 1989
126. Mee MO, Stevenson JS, Scoby RK, et al: InHuence of gonadotropin-releasing hor-
mone and timing of insemination relative to estrus on pregnancy rates of dairy
cattle at first service. J Dairy Sci 73:1500, 1990
127. Melampy RM, Emmerson MA, Rakes JM, et al: The effect of progesterone on the
estrous response of estrogen-conditioned ovariectomized ewes. J Anim Sci
16:967, 1957
128. Mikeska JC, Williams GL: Timing of preovulatory endocrine events, estrus and
ovulation in Brahman X Hereford females synchronized with norgestomet and
estradiol valerate. J Anim Sci 66:939, 1988
129. Monniaux D, Chupin D, Saumande J: Superovulatory responses of cattle. Therio-
genology 19:55, 1983
130. Monniaux D, Gibson JC: Action of PMSG on follicular populations in the heifer. J
Reprod Fert 70:243, 1984
131. Montgomery GW, Scott IC, Hudson N: An interaction between season of calving
and nutrition on the resumption of ovarian cycles in post-partum beef cattle. J
Reprod Fert 72:1984
132. Morrow DA, Roberts SJ, McEntee K: A review of postpartum ovarian activity and
involution of the uterus and cervix in cattle. Cornell Vet 59:134, 1969
133. Munro RK: Concentrations of plasma progesterone in cows after treatment with 3
types of progesterone pessaries. Aust Vet J 64:385, 1987
134. Munro RK: Calving rates of Brahman and Brahman-cross cows to fixed-time insemi-
nation after treatment with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin and intravaginal
progesterone. Aust Vet J 15:21, 1988
135. Munro RK, Bertram J: Progesterone administered after insemination did not affect
the fertility of cattle following a controlled breeding program. Australian Journal
of Experimental Agricculture 30: 1 79, 1990
136. Munro RK, Moore NW: The use of progesterone administered intravaginally and
pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin given by injection in controlled breeding
programs in beef and dairy cattle. Aust Vet J 62:228, 1985
137. Munro RK, Moore NW: Effects of progesterone, estradiol benzoate and clopros-
tenol on luteal function in the heifer. J Reprod Fert 73:353, 1985
138. Munro RK, Moore NW: Plasma concentrations of progesterone in ovariectomized
and prepubertal heifers following intravaginal and intramuscular injection of
progesterone. Anim Reprod Sci 11:81, 1986
139. Murphy BD, Mapletoft RJ, Manns J, et al: Variability in gonadotrophin preparations
as a factor in the superovulatory response. Theriogenology 21: 11 7, 1984
140. Nanda AS, Ward WR, Williams PCW, et al: Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of
different hormone treatments of cystic ovarian disease in cattle. Vet Rec
122:155, 1988
141. Nett TM: Function of the hypothalamic-hypophyseal axis during the post-partum
period in ewes and cows. J Reprod Fert Suppl 34:201, 1987
142. Ngategize PK, Kaneene JB, Harsh SB, et al: A financial analysis of alternative
management strategies of cystic follicles. Prev Vet Med 4:463, 1987
143. Odde KG: A review of synchronization of estrus in postpartum cattle. J Anim Sci
68:817, 1990
144. Oldham CM, Martin GB, Knight TW: Stimulation of seasonally anovular Merino
ewes by rams: 1. Time from introduction of rams to the preovulatory LH surge
and ovulation. Anim Reprod Sci 1:283, 1978
145. Patterson DJ, Corah LR, Kiracofe GH, et al: Conception rate in Bos taurus and Bos
indicus crossbred heifers after postweaning energy manipulation and synchroni-
zation of estrus with melengestrol acetate and fenprostalene. J Anim Sci
67:1138, 1989
86 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
146. Pawlyshyn V, Lindsell CE, Braithwaite M, et al: Superovulation of beef cows with
FSH-P: A dose response trial (abstr). Theriogenology 25:179, 1986
147. Perrin MH, Rivier JE, Vale WW: Radioligand assay for gonadtrophin-releasing
hormone: Relative potencies of agonists and antagonists. Endocrinology
106:1289, 1980
148. Peters AR: Reproductive activity of the cow in the post-partum period. I. Factors
affecting the length of the post-partum acyclic period. Br Vet J 140:76, 1984
149. Peters AR: Plasma progesterone and gonadotrophin concentrations following nor-
gestomet treatment with and without cloprostenol in beef cows. Vet Rec
115:164,1984
150. Peters AR, Lamming GE, Pimental MG: Hormone responses to exogenous GnRH
pulses in post-partum dairy cows. J Reprod Fert 75:557, 1985
151. Peters AR, Riley GM: Is the cow a seasonal breeder? Br Vet J 138:533, 1982
152. Phatak AP, Whitmore HL, Brown MD: Effect of gonadotrophin releasing hormone
on conception rate in repeat-breeder dairy cows. Theriogenology 26:605, 1986
153. Pierson RA, Ginther OJ: Ultrasonic imaging of the ovaries and uterus in cattle.
Theriogenology 29:31, 1988
154. Pimentel SM, Pimentel CA, Weston PG, et al: Progesterone secretion by the bovine
fetoplacental unit and responsiveness of corpora lutea to steroidogenic stimuli at
two stages of gestation. Am J Vet Res 47:1967, 1986
155. Prado Delgado AR, Elsden RP, Seidel GEJ: Effects of GnRH on superovulated
cattle. Theriogenology 31:317, 1989
156. Pratt BR, Berardinelle JG, Stevens LP, et al: Induced corpora lutea in the postpar-
tum beef cow: I. comparison of gonadotropin releasing hormone and human
chorionic gonadotropin and effects of progestogen and estrogen. J Anim Sci
54:822, 1982
157. Putnam MR: Initiation and control of parturition in the cow. Compend Contin Educ
Pract Vet 5:S657, 1983
158. Rajamahendran R, Canseco RS, Denbow CJ, et al: Effect of low dose ofFSH given
at the beginning of the estrous cycle and subsequent superovulatory response in
Holstein cows. Theriogenology 28:59, 1987
159. Rajamahendran R, Taylor C: Characterization of ovarian activity in postpartum
dairy cows using ultrasound imaging and progesterone profiles. Anim Reprod Sci
22:171, 1990
160. Ramirez-Godinez JA, Kiracofe GH, McKee RM, et al: Reducing the incidence of
short estrous cycles in beef cows with norgestomet. Theriogenology 15:613,
1981
161. Randel RD: Nutrition and postpartum rebreeding in cattle. J Anim Sci 68:853,
1990
162. Rawlings NC, Weir L, Toddy B, et al: Some endocrine changes associated with the
post-partum period of the suckling beef cow. J Reprod Fert 60:301, 1980
163. Redding TW, Schally V, Arimura A, et al: Stimulation of release and synthesis of
luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in tissue cul-
tures of rat pi~uitaries in response to natural and synthetic LH and FSH releasing
hormone. Endocrinology 90:764, 1972
164. Refsal KR, Jarrin-Maldonado JH, Nachreiner RF: Endocrine profiles in cows with
ovarian cysts experimentally induced by treatment with exogenous estradiol or
adrenocorticotropic hormone. Theriogenology 28:871, 1987
165. Refsal KR, Jarrin-Maldonado JH, Nachreiner RF: Basal and estradiol-induced re-
lease of gonadotropins in dairy cows with naturally occurring ovarian cysts.
Theriogenology 30:679, 1988
166. Rice LE: Control of the beef cow's reproductive cycle. In Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting of the Society of Theriogenology. Austin, TX, 1987, p 288
167. Rieger D, Desaulnier D, Goff AK: Ovulatory response and embryo yield in super-
ovulated Holstein heifers given a priming dose of FSH-P at day 2 of the estrous
cycle. Theriogenology 30:695, 1988
168. Riley GM, Peters AR, Lamming GE: Induction of pulsatile LH release, FSH release
and ovulation in post-partum acyclic beef cows by repeated small doses of GnRH.
J Reprod Fert 63:559, 1981
169. Roberts AJ, Chang CF, Schally AV, et al: Luteinizing hormone concentrations in
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 87
serum of postpartum beef cows injected with microencapsulated luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone analogue. 1 Anim Sci 67:2730, 1989
170. Roberts SI: Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases (Theriogenology). Wood-
stock, Vermont, The Author, 1986
171. Robinson ]E, Karsch FI: Refractoriness to inductive day lengths terminates the
breeding season in the Suffolk ewe. Bioi Reprod 31:656, 1984
172. Robinson ]E, Radford HM, Karsch FI: Seasonal changes in pulsatile luteinizing
hormone (LH) secretion in the ewe: Relationship of frequency of LH pulses to
day length and response to estradiol negative feedback. BioI Reprod 33:324,
1985
173. Robinson]E, Wayne NL, Karsch FI: Refractoriness to inhibitory day lengths initi-
ates the breeding season of the suffolk ewe. BioI Reprod 32:1024, 1985
174. Robinson NA, Leslie KE, Walton IS: Effect of treatment with progesterone on
pregnancy rate and plasma concentrations of progesterone in Holstein cows. 1
Dairy Sci 72:202, 1989
175. Roche IF, Ireland JJ: Effect of exogenous progesterone on time of occurrence of
the LH surge in heifers. 1 Anim Sci 52:580, 1981
176. Roche IF, Ireland JJ: Manipulation of ovulation in cattle. Proc 10th Int Cong Anim
Reprod A I, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 4:9, 1984
177. Rutter LM, Carruthers TD, Manns IG: The postpartum induced corpus luteum:
Functional differences from that of cycling cows and the effects of progesterone
pretreatment. BioI Reprod 33:560, 1985
178. Saumande 1: Concentrations ofluteinizing hormone, oestradiol-17B and progester-
one in the plasma of heifers treated to induce superovulation. 1 Endocrinol
84:425, 1980
179. Saumande 1, Chupin D: Induction of superovulation in cyclic heifers: The inhibi-
tory effect of large doses of PMSG. Theriogenology 25:233, 1986
180. Saumande 1, Procureur R, Chupin D: Effect of injection time of anti-PMSG anti-
serum on ovulation rate and quality of embryos in superovulated cows. Therio-
genology 21:727, 1984
181. Savage NC, Howell W, Mapletoft RI: Superovulation in the cow using estra-
diol 17beta or GnRH in conjunction with FSH-P. Theriogenology 27:383,
1987
182. Savio ID, Boland MP, Hynes N, et al: Resumption of follicular activity in the early
post-partum period of dairy cows. 1 Reprod Fert 88:569, 1990
183. Savio ID, Boland MP, Roche IF: Development of dominant follicles and length of
ovarian cycles in post-partum dairy cows. 1 Reprod Fert 88:581, 1990
184. Savio ]D, Keenan L, Boland MP, et al: Pattern of growth of dominant follicles
during the estrous cycle of heifers. 1 Reprod Fert 83:663, 1988
185. Scanlon P, Sreenan 1, Gordon I: Hormonal induction of superovulation in cattle. 1
Agric Sci 70:179, 1976
186. Scaramuzzi RI, Campbell BK: Physiological regulation of ovulation rate in the ewe:
A new look at an old problem. In Oldham CM, Martin GB, Purvis IW (eds):
Reproductive Physiology of Merino Sheep: Concepts and Consequences. Perth,
School of Agriculture (Animal Science), The University of Western Australia,
1990, p 71
187. Schallenberger E, Schams D, Meyer HHD: Sequences of pituitary, ovarian and
uterine hormone secretion during the first 5 weeks of pregnancy in dairy cattle. 1
Reprod Fert Suppl 37:277, 1989
188. Schams D, Menzer CH, Schallenberger E, et al: Some studies on pregnant mare
serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and on endocrine responses after application for
superovulation in cattle. In Sreenan JR (ed): Control of Reproduction in the Cow.
The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1978, p 122
189. Schams D, Schallenberger E, Menzer CH, et al: Profiles ofLH, FSH and progester-
one in postpartum dairy cows and their relationship to the commencement of
cyclic functions. Theriogenology 10:453, 1978
190. Scott IC, Montgomery GW: Introduction of bulls induces return of cyclic ovarian
function in post-partum beef cows. N Z 1 Agric Res 30:190, 1987
191. Seguin BE: Comparative luteolytic activity of estradiol cyclopentyl propionate and
prostaglandin F2a in diestrus cows. Theriogenology 11:445, 1979
88 PATRICK J. WRIGHT AND JAKOB MALMO
192. Seguin BE, Tate DJ, Otterby DE: Use of cloprostenol in a reproductive manage-
ment system for dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 183:533, 1983
193. Sheffel CE, Pratt BR, Ferrell WL, et al: Induced corpora lute a in the postpartum
beef cow: II. Effects of treatment with progestogen and gonadotropins. J Anim
Sci 54:830, 1982
194. Shively TE, Williams GL: Patterns of tonic luteinizing hormone release and ovula-
tion frequency in suckled anestrous beef cows following varying intervals of
temporary weaning. Domest Anim Endocrinol 6:379, 1989
195. Short RE, Adams DC: Nutritional and hormonal interrelationships in beef cattle
reproduction. Can J Anim Sci 68:29, 1988
196. Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, et al: Physiological mechanisms controlling
anoestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J Anim Sci 68:799, 1990
197. Signoret JP: The influence of ram effect on the breeding activity of ewes and its
underlying physiology. In Oldham CM, Martin GB, Purvis IW (eds): Reproduc-
tive Physiology in Merino Sheep: Concepts and Consequences. Perth, School of
Agriculture (Animal Science), The University of Western Australia, 1990, p 59
198. Sirois J, Fortune JE: Ovarian follicular dynamics during the estrous cycle in heifers
monitored by real-time ultrasonography. BioI Reprod 39:308, 1988
199. Sirois J, Fortune JE: Lengthening the bovine estrous cycle with low levels of
exogenous progesterone: A model for studying ovarian follicular dominance.
Endocrinology 127:916, 1990
200. Smith VG, Chenault JR, McAllister JF, et al: Response of postpartum beef cows to
exogenous progestogens and gonadotropin releasing hormone. J Anim Sci
64:540, 1987
201. Spicer LJ, Echternkamp SE: Ovarian follicular growth, function and turnover in
cattle: A review. J Anim Sci 62:428, 1986
202. Sreenan JM, Diskin MJ: The extent and timing of embryonic mortality in cattle. In
Sreenan JM, Diskin MG (eds): Embryonic Mortality in Farm Animals. Dordrecht,
the Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, 1986, p 1
203. Stabenfeldt GH, Hughes JP, Neely DP, et al: Physiologic and pathophysiologic
aspects of prostaglandin F2a during reproductive cycle. J Am Vet Med Assoc
176:1187, 1980
204. Steffiug JH, Louis TM, Hafs HD, et al: Luteolysis, estrus and ovulation, and blood
prostaglandin F after intramuscular administration of 15, 30 or 60 mg of prosta-
glandin F2a. Prostaglandins 9:609, 1975
205. Stevenson JS, Frantz KD, Call EP: Conception rates in repeat-breeders and dairy
cattle with unobserved estrus after prostaglandin F2a and gonadotropin-releas-
ing hormone. Theriogenology 29:451, 1988
206. Swift AD, Crighton DB: Relative activity, plasma elimination and tissue degrada-
tion of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone and certain of its ana-
logues. J Endocrinol 80:141, 1979
207. Terqui M: Reproductive potential during the post-partum period in cows. In Ellen-
dorffF, Elsaesser F (eds): Endocrine Causes of Seasonal and Lactational Anestrus
in Farm Animals. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, p 199
208. Thatcher WW, Hansen pJ, Bazer FW: Role of the conceptus in the establishment of
pregnancy. Proc lith Int Cong Anim Reprod A I, Dublin, 5:45, 1988
209. Thatcher WW, Larson LE, Drost M, et al: HCG-induced alterations in pregnancy
rate of lactating cows during summer months in South Florida. J Dairy Sci 70
(suppl 1):206, 1987
210. Thatcher WW, Macmillan KL, Hansen PJ, et al: Concepts for regulation of corpus
luteum function by the conceptus and ovarian follicles to improve fertility. Ther-
iogenology 31:149, 1989
211. Troxel TR, Kesler DJ: The effect of progestin and GnRH treatments on ovarian
function and reproductive hormone secretions of anestrous postpartum suckled
beef cows. Theriogenology 21:699, 1984
212. Vandeplassche M, Bouters R, Spincemaille J, et al: Induction of parturition in cases
of pathological gestation in cattle. Theriogenology 1: 115, 1974
213. Vorstemans JPM, Walton JS: Effect of intermittent injections of gonadotrophin
releasing hormone at various frequencies on the release of luteinizing hormone
and ovulation in dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 8:335, 1985
214. Voss HJ, Allen SE, Foote RH, et al: Buserelin in a superovulatory regimen for
PHARMACOLOGIC MANIPULATION OF FERTILITY 89
Holstein cows: I. Pituitary and ovarian hormone response in an experimental
herd. Theriogenology 31:371, 1989
215. Walters DL, Short RE, Convey EM, et al: Pituitary and ovarian function in post
partum beef cows. II. Endocrine changes prior to ovulation in suckled and non
suckled post partum cows compared to cycling cows. BioI Reprod 26:647, 1982
216. Walters DL, Short RE, Convey EM, et al: Pituitary and ovarian function in post-
partum beef cows. m. Induction of estrus, ovulation and luteal function with
intermittent small-dose injections of GnRH. BioI Reprod 26:655, 1982
217. Watson ED: A note on the effect of post-parturient fatty liver on clearance rate of
exogenous progesterone from blood. Anim Prod 42:425, 1986
218. Welch RAS, Day AM, Duganzich DM, et al: Induced calving, A comparison of
treatment regimens. N Z Vet J 27:190, 1979
219. Welch RAS, Newling P, Anderson D: Induction of parturition in cattle with cortico-
steroids. An analysis of field trials. N Z Vet J 21:103, 1973
220. Wendorf GL, Lawyer MS, First NL: Role of the adrenals in the maintenance of
pregnancy in cows. J Reprod Fert 68:281, 1983
221. Whittier JC, Deutscher GH, Clanton DC: Progestin and prostaglandin for estrous
synchronization in beef heifers. J Anim Sci 63:700, 1986
222. Williams GL: Suckling as a regulator of postpartum rebreeding in cattle: A review. J
Anim Sci 68:831, 1990
223. Wiltbank IN, Ingalls IE, Rowden WW: Effects of various levels of estrogens alone
or in combination with gonadotrophins on the estrous cycle of beef heifers. J
Anim Sci 20:341, 1961
224. Wishart DF: Synchronisation of oestrus in heifers using steroid (SC 5914, SC 9880
and SC 21009) treatment for 21 days: 2. The effect of treatment on the ovum
collection and fertilisation rate and the development of the early embryo. Ther-
iogenology 8:249, 1977
225. Wright pJ, Clarke IJ, Findlay JK: The induction of fertile oestrus in seasonally
anoestrous ewes using a continuous low dose administration of gonadotrophin
releasing hormone. Aust Vet J 60:254, 1983
226. Wright pJ, Davis KE, Clarke IJ, et al: The effect of undernutrition on the inhibitory
effect of oestradiol on plasma LH concentrations in ewes during seasonal anoes-
trus and during the post-partum period. Proc 11th Int Cong Anim Reprod A I,
Dublin 75:1988
227. Wubishet A, Graves CN, Spahr SL, et al: Effects ofGnRH treatment on superovula-
tory responses of dairy cows. Theriogenology 25:423, 1986
228. Yadav MC, Walton JS, Leslie KE: Plasma concentrations ofluteinising hormone and
progesterone during superovulation of dairy cows using follicle stimulating hor-
mone or pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin. Theriogenology 26:523, 1986
229. Young 1M, Anderson DB: First service conception rate in dairy cows treated with
dinoprost tromethamine early post partum. Vet Rec 118:212, 1986
230. Young 1M, Anderson DB, Plenderleith RWJ: Increased conception rate in dairy
cows after early post partum administration of prostaglandin F2alpha THAM. Vet
Rec 115:429, 1984
231. Youngquist RS: Cystic follicular degeneration in the cow. In Morrow DA (ed):
Current Therapy in Theriogenology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1986, p 243
232. Zalesky DD, Day ML, Garcia-Winder M, et al: InHuence of exposure to bulls on
resumption of estrous cycles following parturition in beef cows. J Anim Sci
59:1135,1984
233. Zalesky DD, Forrest DW, McArthur NH, et al: Suckling inhibits release ofluteiniz-
ing hormone-releasing hormone from the bovine median eminence following
ovariectomy. J Anim Sci 68:444, 1990
Address reprint requests to