Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OM Chapter One and Two For Marketing
OM Chapter One and Two For Marketing
Automobile Sheet steel, Tools, equipment, Fabrication and assembly of cars High quality
factory engine parts workers physical) automobile
College or High school Teachers book, Imparting knowledge & skills via lecture Educated
university graduates classrooms (informational) individuals
1.5.PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT
Productivity is defined in terms of utilization of resources, like material and labor. In simple terms,
productivity is the ratio of output to input. For example, productivity of labor can be measured as
units produced per labor hour worked. Productivity is closely linked with quality, technology and
profitability. Hence, there is a strong stress on productivity improvement in competitive business
environment. Productivity can be improved by:
(a) controlling inputs,
(b) improving process so that the same input yields higher output, and
(c) by improvement of technology
Productivity can be measured at firm level, at industry level, at national level and at international
level.
Factor Productivity and Total Productivity
When productivity is measured separately for each input resource to the production process it is
called factor productivity or partial productivity. When productivity is measured for all the factors
of production together, it is called total factor productivity. Generally factor productivity
calculations are required at firm level and industry level, whereas total factor productivity
calculations are made for measuring productivity at national and international level. Productivity
of materials can be measured as output units per unit material consumed. It can also be measured
in terms of value generated per unit expenditure in materials. For measuring productivity of
different groups of operatives, different ratios can be used, which are indicative of output/input
relationship. For example, the productivity of assembly line work can be measured as output units
per man-hour or alternatively, the value of good produced per cost of labour on assembly line.
One of the primary responsibilities of an operation manger is to achieve productive use of
resources. Productivity measures the relationship between output (goods and Services) and inputs
(labor, capital, materials, or other resources) used to produce them. Productivity usually expressed
the ratio of quantity of output to quantity of input.
Thus, Productivity = Output
Input Productivity may be expressed as partial measures, multifactor measures, or total measures.
i. Partial productivity (A single input)
Productivity = Output or Output or Output or Output & so on.
Labour Capital Materials Energy
ii. Multifactor productivity (Based on more than one input)
It reflects a combination of some or all of the resources used to obtain a certain output.
Productivity= Output/Labor +Capital
Or
Output/ Labor + Capital +Material
iii. Total productivity (Based on total measure or on all inputs)
Productivity= Output = Goods or services produced
Input All inputs used to produce them
Example 1.
Three employees process 600 insurance policies in a week. They work 8 hrs. Per day, 5-days per
week. Find labour productivity.
Solution:
Labor Productivity = [Policies Issued]/[Employee Hours]
P of labor = 600 policies/ [(3 employees) (40 hrs/employee)] P labor = 5 Policies/hr.
Example 2.
A team of workers make 400 units of a product, which is valued by its standard cost of 10 birr
each (before mark-ups for other expenses and profit). The accounting department reports that for
this job the actual costs are:
400 birr for labour, and
1 000 birr for materials
Calculate multi-factor productivity.
Solution:
Multi-Factor Productivity = [Quantity at standard cost]/[Labour cost + Materials cost]
Pmf = [400 Units x 10]/ [400+1000] = 4000 / 1400
Pmf = 2.86
Productivity comparisons can be made in two ways:
First, a company can compare itself with similar operations within its industry or it can use
industry data when such data are available. For example, comparing productivity among the
different stores in a franchise. Second, to measure productivity overtime with in the same
operations. I.e. A Company can compare its productivity in one time period with that of the next.
The long-range plan of a business, designed to provide and sustain shareholder value, is called the
business strategy. For a company to succeed, the business strategy must be supported by each of
the individual business functions, such as operations, finance, and marketing.
Operations strategy is a long-range plan for the operations function that specifies the design and
use of resources to support the business strategy. Operations strategy is a long term plan for the
production of a company’s products/rendering services and it provides a road map for what the
production/operations function must do if business strategies are to be achieved. Operations
strategy is the total patterns of decisions and actions which set the role, objectives and activities of
the operation so that they contribute to, and support the organisation’s business strategy.
Operations strategy is the decisions which shape the long-term capabilities of the company’s
operations and their contribution to overall strategy through the on-going reconciliation of market
requirements and operations resources.
The role of operations strategy is to provide a plan for the operations function so that it can make
the best use of its resources. Operations strategy specifies the policies and plans for using the
organization’s resources to support its long-term competitive strategy.
A company’s business strategy is developed after its managers have considered many factors and
have made some strategic decisions. These include developing an understanding of what business
the company is in (the company’s mission), analyzing and developing an understanding of the
market (environmental scanning), and identifying the company’s strengths (core competencies).
These three factors are critical to the development of the company’s long-range plan, or business
strategy. In this section, we describe each of these elements in detail and show how they are
combined to formulate the business strategy
Mission: A statement defining what business an organization is in, who its customers are, and how
its core beliefs shape its business. The mission defines the company. In order to develop a long-
term plan for a business, you must first know exactly what business you are in, what customers
you are serving, and what your company’s values are. If a company does not have a welldefined
mission it may pursue business opportunities about which it has no real knowledge or that are in
conflict with its current pursuits, or it may miss opportunities altogether.
Environmental scanning allows a company to identify opportunities and threats. For example,
through environmental scanning we could see gaps in what customers need and what competitors
are doing to meet those needs. A study of these gaps could reveal an opportunity for our company,
and we could design a plan to take advantage of it. On the other hand, our company may currently
be a leader in its industry, but environmental scanning could reveal competitors that are meeting
customer needs better — for example, by offering a wider array of services. In this case,
environmental scanning would reveal a threat and we would have to change our strategy so as not
to be left behind. Just because a company is an industry leader today does not mean it will continue
to be a leader in the future.
The external business environment is always changing. To stay ahead of the competition, a
company must constantly look out for trends or changing patterns in the environment, such as
marketplace trends. These might include changes in customer wants and expectations, and ways
in which competitors are meeting those expectations. For example, in the computer industry
customers are demanding speed of delivery, high quality, and low price.
In addition to market trends, environmental scanning looks at economic, political, and social trends
that can affect the business. Economic trends include recession, inflation, interest rates, and general
economic conditions. Suppose that a company is considering obtaining a loan in order to purchase
a new facility. Environmental scanning could show that interest rates are particularly favorable
and that this may be a good time to go ahead with the purchase. Political trends include changes
in the political climate — local, national, and international — that could affect a company. There
has been a change in how companies view their environment, a shift from a national to a global
perspective. Companies seek customers and suppliers all over the globe. Many have changed their
strategies in order to take advantage of global opportunities, such as forming partnerships with
international firms, called strategic alliances.
Finally, social trends are changes in society that can have an impact on a business. An example is
the awareness of the dangers of smoking, which has made smoking less socially acceptable. This
trend has had a huge impact on companies in the tobacco industry. In order to survive, many of
these companies have changed their strategy to focus on customers overseas where smoking is still
socially acceptable, or have diversified into other product lines.
Core Competencies: The third factor that helps define a business strategy is an understanding of
the company’s strengths. These are called core competencies. In order to formulate a long-term
plan, the company’s managers must know the competencies of their organization. Core
competencies could include special skills of workers, such as expertise in providing customized
services or knowledge of information technology. Another example might be flexible facilities
that can handle the production of a wide array of products. To be successful, a company must
compete in markets where its core competencies will have value.
Highly successful firms develop a business strategy that takes advantage of their core
competencies or strengths. To see why it is important to use core competencies, think of a student
developing plans for a successful professional career. Let’s say that this student is particularly
good at mathematics but not as good in verbal communication and persuasion. Taking advantage
of core competencies would mean developing a career strategy in which the student’s strengths
could provide an advantage, such as engineering or computer science. On the other hand, pursuing
a career in marketing would place the student at a disadvantage because of a relative lack of skills
in persuasion. Increased global competition has driven many companies to clearly identify their
core competencies and outsource those activities considered noncore. Outsourcing is when a
company obtains goods or services from an outside provider. By outsourcing noncore activities a
company can focus on its core competencies.
Putting It Together:
The figure shows how the mission, environmental scanning, and core competencies help in the
formulation of the business strategy. This is an ongoing process that is constantly allowed to
change. As environmental scanning reveals changes in the external environment, the company
may need to change its business strategy to remain competitive while taking advantage of its core
competencies and staying within its mission.
Make sure that you understand the role of the business strategy in defining a company’s long-term
plan. Without a business strategy the company would have no overriding plan. Such a plan acts
like a compass, pointing the company in the right direction. To be effective, a long-range plan
must be supported by each of the business functions. The operations strategy looks at the business
strategy and develops a long-range plan specifically for the operations function. In the next section
we will see how the operations strategy is developed.
An operations strategy is a strategy for the operations functions that is linked to the business
strategy and other functional strategy, leading to a consistence pattern of decision making and
competitive advantage for the firm. An operations strategy consists of a sequence of decisions that,
over time, enables a business unit to achieve a desired operations structure, infrastructure, and set
of specific capabilities in support of the competitive priorities.
Once a business strategy has been developed, an operations strategy must be formulated. This will
provide a plan for the design and management of the operations function in ways that support the
business strategy. The operations strategy relates the business strategy to the operations function.
It focuses on specific capabilities of the operation that give the company a competitive edge. These
capabilities are called competitive priorities. By excelling in one of these capabilities, a company
can become a winner in its market.
Competitive Priorities
Operations managers must work closely with marketing in order to understand the competitive
situation in the company’s market before they can determine which competitive priorities are
important. There are four broad categories of competitive priorities:
Low-cost leadership/Competing based on Cost: Competing based on cost means offering a
product at a low price relative to the prices of competing products. The need for this type of
competition emerges from the business strategy. Note that a low-cost strategy can result in a higher
profit margin, even at a competitive price. Also, low cost does not imply low quality. Let’s look
at some specific characteristics of the operations function we might find in a company competing
on cost.
It requires examining each of the 10 OM decisions in a relentless effort to drive down costs while
meeting customer expectations of value. A low-cost strategy does not imply low value or low
quality.
To develop this competitive priority, the operations function must focus primarily on cutting costs
in the system, such as costs of labor, materials, and facilities. Companies that compete based on
cost study their operations system carefully to eliminate all waste. They might offer extra training
to employees to maximize their productivity and minimize scrap. Also, they might invest in
automation in order to increase productivity. Generally, companies that compete based on cost
offer a narrow range of products and product features, allow for little customization, and have an
operations process that is designed to be as efficient as possible.
Quality: Many companies claim that quality is their top priority, and many customers say that they
look for quality in the products they buy. Yet quality has a subjective meaning; it depends on who
is defining it. When companies focus on quality as a competitive priority, they are focusing on the
dimensions of quality that are considered important by their customers. Quality as a competitive
priority has two dimensions. The first is high-performance design. This means that the operations
function will be designed to focus on aspects of quality such as superior features, close tolerances,
high durability, and excellent customer service. The second dimension is goods and services
consistency, which measures how often the goods or services meet the exact design specifications.
A company that competes on this dimension needs to implement quality in every area of the
organization. One of the first aspects that needs to be addressed is product design quality, which
involves making sure the product meets the requirements of the customer. A second aspect is
process quality, which deals with designing a process to produce error-free products. This includes
focusing on equipment, workers, materials, and every other aspect of the operation to make sure it
works the way it is supposed to. Companies that compete based on quality have to address both of
these issues: the product must be designed to meet customer needs, and the process must produce
the product exactly as it is designed.
Time: Time or speed is one of the most important competitive priorities today. Companies in all
industries are competing to deliver high-quality products in as short a time as possible. A
competitive priority focusing on speed and on-time delivery. When time is a competitive priority,
the job of the operations function is to critically analyze the system and combine or eliminate
processes in order to save time. Often companies use technology to speed up processes, rely on a
flexible workforce to meet peak demand periods, and eliminate unnecessary steps in the production
process.
To help a company decide which competitive priorities to focus on, it is important to distinguish
between order winners and order qualifiers. Order qualifiers are those competitive priorities that a
company has to meet if it wants to do business in a particular market. Order winners, on the other
hand, are the competitive priorities that help a company win orders in the market. Consider a
simple restaurant that makes and delivers pizzas. Order qualifiers might be low price (say, less
than $10.00) and quick delivery (say, under 15 minutes), because this is a standard that has been
set by competing pizza restaurants. The order winners may be “fresh ingredients” and “home-made
taste.” These characteristics may differentiate the restaurant from all the other pizza restaurants.
However, regardless of how good the pizza, the restaurant will not succeed if it does not meet the
minimum standard for order qualifiers. Knowing the order winners and order qualifiers in a
particular market is critical to focusing on the right competitive priorities.
Managers make effective decisions on 10 areas of OM. These are collectively known as operations
decisions. The 10 decisions of that support missions and implement strategies are:
1. Goods and service design: Designing goods and services defines much of the transformation
process. Costs, quality, and human resource decisions are often determined by design decisions.
Designs usually determine the lower limits of cost and the upper limits of quality.
2. Quality: The customer's quality expectations must be determined and policies and procedures
established to identify and achieve that quality.
3. Process and capacity design: Process options are available for products and services. Process
decisions commit management to specific technology, quality, human resource use, and
maintenance. These expenses and capital commitments determine much of the firm's basic cost
structure.
4. Location selection: Facility location decisions for both manufacturing and service organizations
may determine the firm's ultimate success. Errors made at this juncture may overwhelm other
efficiencies.
5. Layout design: Material flows, capacity needs, personnel levels, technology decisions, and
inventory requirements influence layout.
6. Human resources and job design: People are an integral and expensive part of the total system
design. Therefore, the quality of work life provided, the talent and skills required, and their costs
must be determined.
7. Supply-chain management: These decisions determine what is to be made and what is to be
purchased. Consideration is also given to quality, delivery, and innovation, all at a satisfactory
price. Mutual trust between buyer and supplier is necessary for effective purchasing.
8. Inventory: Inventory decisions can be optimized only when customer satisfaction, suppliers,
production schedules, and human resource planning are considered.
9. Scheduling: Feasible and efficient schedules of production must be developed; the demands on
human resources and facilities must be determined and controlled.
10. Maintenance: Decisions must be made regarding desired levels of reliability and stability, and
systems must be established to maintain that reliability and stability.
Why Some Organizations Fail
Organizations fail, or perform poorly, for a variety of reasons. Being aware of those reasons can
help managers avoid making similar mistakes. Among the chief reasons are the following:
Operations must work with marketing to obtain information on the relative importance of the
various items to each major customer or target market. Understanding competitive issues can help
managers develop successful strategies.
Service sector firms face some of the same challenges as manufacturing firms, and some unique
challenges of their own. First, services are increasingly either managed or traded internationally,
and so service firms need to devise plans for how this will be accomplished. Where services and
manufacturing are closely linked in the overall provision to customers, the role of services can be
vital. In the past, companies often located manufacturing facilities in different countries to take
advantage of local resources and wage rates and the emphasis was on the manufacturing element.
However, today multinational corporations are locating services where they can access highly
trained workers at reasonable costs. Service organizations may choose one of three generic
strategies:
1. Customer-oriented focus – providing a wide range of services to a limited range of customers, using
a customer-centred database and developing new offerings to existing customers
2. Service-oriented focus – providing a focused, ‘limited menu’ of services to a wide range of
customers, usually through specialization in a narrow range of services
3. Customer- and service-oriented focus – providing a limited range of services to a highly targeted
set of customers.
Ensuring service quality is a key competitive objective for most service organizations. Unlike
manufacturing, customer contact in services means that both front-line employees and customers
influence the quality and perception of the service.
Service failures occur when the service is unavailable, too slow, or does not meet organizational
or customer standards. Two ways that companies can mitigate service failures are service
guarantees and service recovery.
Many companies now offer service guarantees as a way of ensuring customer satisfaction. For
example, overnight document delivery service Federal Express guarantees delivery of packages
by 10.30 am the morning after the package was mailed, otherwise the entire cost will be refunded.
Although most organizations strive for 100 per cent ‘right-first-time’ performance, occasionally
something goes wrong. Service recovery describes how the company makes up for problems with
the service. Research suggests that effective service recovery can in fact lead to more loyal
customers (quoted in Zeithaml and Bitner, 2000). One trend in service is to have customers become
partners in the service delivery system by transferring at least part of production to them, variously
known as co-production or consumerization of production. For example:
• Fast-food restaurants – customers collect their food from the counter, transport it to where they will
eat it, and clear away afterwards
• Petrol stations – customers pump their own petrol and may pay for it at the pump, eliminating all
contact with employees
• Banks – customers use automated teller machines (ATMs) to perform many activities formerly
requiring tellers, including cash deposits and withdrawals and account status queries.
In becoming part of the production process, making the client productive can take place in the
following ways.
• The first way to make clients productive is to involve them in the specification of custom-
tailored services. There are many familiar services that rely on customer specification, such
as kitchen design.
• A second way is to include customers in the production of the service, thus turning them
into ‘involuntary unpaid labour’. Most of us have become accustomed to eating at least
occasionally in fast-food restaurants, where we (instead of employees) are responsible for
clearing tables, etc. In return, these offer (at least in theory) faster service and lower costs,
since employees have less work to perform.
• A third way is to make the customer responsible for quality control. A popular restaurant
trend has been restaurants such as the ‘Mongolian Wok’ chain, where customers select
their own ingredients from a buffet, and then hand them over to a chef for stir-frying – they
can include their favorite ingredients and exclude those they dislike, rather than accepting
a standard range.