Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04 Chapter I
04 Chapter I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization are the most spoken words in the
world. These have thepaved way for all-round reforms, especially in developing
economies like India. There are many countries that haverealizedthat the efficient
means of communications and information technology is important to push them into
the path of development. The growth in the telecommunication sector in India during
post-liberalization has been extraordinary. This chapter aims to presents the factors
that contributed to the growth of the segment, an insight into the present status of the
industry and research design of the study.
1.2TELECOMMUNICATION IN INDIA
1.2.1 GROWTH OF TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY IN INDIA
In 1880, The Oriental Telephone Company Limited and the Anglo-Indian
Company Limited approached The Indian Government to establish telephone
exchanges in India. But the permission was not granted to start the sameso as
tomaintain Government monopoly and that the Government itself would undertake
the work. However, it has been reconsidered in the forthcoming years and the
Government agreed to issue license to the Oriental Telephone Company Limited of
England for starting telephone exchanges at Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and
Ahmadabad. This was the first telephone exchange that was established in India on 28
January, 1882. The exchange in Calcutta named “Central Exchange” and Central
Telephone Exchange had 93 numbers of subscribers. The Department of Telecom
(DoT) was separated in 1975, from India Post and Telecommunication Accounts and
Finance Servicethe DoT was responsible for all telecom services in the entire country
until 1985. Mahanager Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) was impressed out of DoT
to run the telecom services of Mumbai and Delhi. In the year 1990s the telephone
industry was opened by the Government for private investment as a part of
Liberalization-Privatization. 1
1
http://en.Wikipedia.Org/wiki/Communications in India.
2
The new telecom policy of 1994 proved a landmark step, as it permitted the
entry of private telephony operators into the market. In 1994, the government set up
the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to regulate the growing telecom
sector in India. In 2000 Department of telecommunication establishes the Bharat
Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL). The most remarkable achievements of the Indian
Telecom industry at the turn of the 21st Century have the tremendous growth of the
wireless telephony market. The DoT is the first formal set up by the Government with
the responsibility of handling issues relating to policy, coordination and licensing of
various forms of telecommunication, including telephone, telegraph, wireless, data,
telematics, facsimile, services and others. The Government of India facilitated to
smoothfunctioning of BSNL by allowing a speedier decision-making process,
facilitated by minimal Government intervention.
The Prime Minister of India signed contracts, in the year 1981 with Alcatel
CIT of France to mergethe state-owned Telecom Company (ITI), in an effort to set up
5,000,000 lines per year. Indira Gandhi invited Sam Pitrodaas a Non-resident Indian
(NRI) to set up a Center for Development of Telematics (C-DOT); however, the plan
failed due to political reasons. After that many public sector organizations were set up
3
2
Dash, Kishore, “Veto Players and deregulation of State-owned Enterprises: The case
of Telecommunications in India”.
http://www.thunderbird.edu/www/filws/publications/magazine/fall 2005 /pdf.files
4
and issuing licenses to private operators. The Government further reduced license fees
result in the reduction of service fees and the call costs were cut greatly enabling
every common middle-class family in India to afford a cell phone and nearly 32
million handsets were sold in India. It shows the real potential for growth of the
Indian mobile market.3
In 1993 the telecom industry got an annual foreign investment of 20.6 million.
In 1994 license for providing cellular mobile services was granted by the Government
of India for the Metropolitan cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai. Initially,
Cellular mobile services were a duopoly. Under a fixed license fee, in 1995, the
government opened up 19 more telecom circles and issued mobile licenses. 4
3
http://www.trai.gov.in.
4
http://www.dot.gov.in/annual Report
5
country except for Delhi and Mumbai Metros which are under Mahanagar Telephone
Nigam Limited (MTNL).
The second generation (2G) launched in 1991 by Elisa Oyj, in Finland. The
second generation allowed for enhanced data services and also introduced a short
messaging service (SMS). Because of the introduction of 2G voice communications
6
were digitally encrypted. This allowed greater privacy, efficient data transfer and also
less expensive equipment. The introduction of General Packet Radio Servicesand the
usage of CDMA one networks collectively came to be known as 2.5G. GPRS
provided data services like WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) and MMS
(Multimedia Messaging) are introduced, along with Internet services. 2.75G was the
name given to the evolution of EDGE (Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution) or
Enhanced GPRS (EGPRS). This facilitates higher data transfer rates, almost triple of
the previous rates and it is widely used generation of mobile telecommunication
networks, which is using now most mobile phones in India.
The 4G mobile phones are all set to provide data transfer is mind-boggling to
say the least. These speeds are not even present in wired networks commercially. 4G
has just been launched in India and is available on selected mobile operators.
7
million for the period from 2003-04 to 2-17-18 with a low of 867.80 million in the
year 2012-13.
1.3.2 Growth of urban subscribers
The growth of urban subscribers in wireless users and wireline users by the
end of March 2018 is given in the below Table 1.2.
Table 1.2
Growth of Urban Subscribers (in Millions)
Wireline Wireless
Year Total
Subscriber Subscriber
2009 - 10 27.16 393.34 420.47
The growth of mobile phone users in India are given in the Table 1.4.
Table 1.4
Growth of Mobile Services
CAGR 28.94
Source: TRAI Annual reports
The Table 3.4 explains the growth of mobile phones in terms of subscriber
base for the years 2003-04 to 2017-18. The trend in the growth rate of the subscriber
base depicted an increasing trend over the years. The mobile services in 2003-04,
33.69 million increased to 1183.41 million as on 31st March, 2018 and registering a
decline of 867.80 Million during the year 2012-13. The decline in Wireless
connections is mainly due to deactivation of inactive connections. The maximum
11
growth of subscriber base was 89.14 percent during the year 2005-06. It could also be
said that mean compound annual growth rate of mobile phones in subscriber base was
28.94 percent during the period. Though the growth trend was fluctuating over the
years, there was consistency in the growth of mobile phones subscriber base. The
growth of mobile is represented in the below graph,
Graph 1.1
Growth of Mobile Phone Services in India
(Rs. in millions)
1400
1206.22
1194.99
1200
1059.33
996.15
1000 919.17
811.59
800
584.32
600
391.76
400
261.07
165.11
200 90.14
52.22
The mobile phone services provided in India mostly dominated by the private
players of Aircel, Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance, Tata docomo and Idea cellular service
providers. The table 1.5 depicts the growth of mobile phone service providers in
India.
12
Table 1.5
Growth of Cellular Service Providers
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Service Providers
-04 -05 -06 -07 -08 -09 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 -18
Bharti Airtel 6.50 10.98 19.58 37.14 61.98 93.92 127.62 162.20 181.28 188.20 205.39 226.02 251.24 273.65 304.19
Hutch/ Vodafone 5.15 7.80 15.36 26.44 44.13 68.77 100.86 134.57 150.47 152.35 166.56 183.80 197.95 209.06 222.70
Reliance
7.26 10.45 17.31 28.01 45.79 72.67 102.42 135.72 153.05 122.97 110.89 109.47 102.41 83.50 0.19
RCL/RTL
Spice 1.21 1.44 1.93 2.73 4.21 4.13 - - - -
Idea/ Spice/
2.73 5.07 7.37 14.01 24.00 38.89 63.82 89.50 112.72 121.61 135.79 157.81 175.07 195.37 211.21
Escotel
BSNL 5.53 9.90 17.65 30.99 40.79 52.15 69.45 91.83 98.51 101.21 94.65 77.22 86.35 100.99 111.68
Tata 0.63 1.09 4.85 16.02 24.33 35.12 65.94 89.14 81.75 66.42 63.00 66.32 60.10 48.99 31.19
Aircel 1.29 1.76 2.61 5.51 10.61 18.48 36.86 54.84 62.57 60.07 70.15 81.40 87.09 90.90 74.15
Reliance JIO (*) 108.68 186.56
Unitech
(Telewings) 4.26 22.79 42.43 31.68 35.61 45.62 52.45 50.49 37.98
Telenor
Sistema 0.39 3.78 10.06 15.80 11.91 9.04 8.86 7.69 4.91
MTNL 0.46 1.08 2.05 2.94 3.53 4.48 5.09 5.47 5.83 5.00 3.37 3.51 3.56 3.63 3.56
BPL/ 1.88 2.58 1.34 1.07 1.29 2.16 - - - - - -
Loop(#) - - - - - - 2.84 3.09 3.27 3.01 2.90
Videocon (@) - - - - - - 0.03 7.11 5.95 2.01 4.99 7.13 6.56
HFCL/ 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.15 0.30 0.60 0.33 1.47 1.33
Quadrant ($) - - - - - - 1.37 2.17 2.73 3.16
S Tel - - - - - - 1.01 2.82 3.43
Escotel 0.99 - - - - - - - - -
Etisalat - - - - - - - 0.97 0.78 -
Shyam 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.11 - - - - -
Total 33.69 52.23 90.14 165.11 261.07 391.76 584.32 811.59 919.17 867.81 904.51 969.89 1033.63 1170.18 1183.41
(*) M/s RelianceJioInfocomm Ltd launched their commercial services in 2016-17
(#) M/s Loop services were discontinued since 2014-15 (@) M/s Videocon Ltd. Discontinued their commercial service since May 2016.
($) M/s Quadrant Televentures Ltd. discontinued their commercial service on 15 th February 2017
13
The Table 1.5 displays growth of Bharti Airtel subscribers 6.50 million in 2005-06
increased to 304.19 million in 2017-18. Vodafone subscribers 5.15 million in 2005-06
increased to 222.70 million in 2017-18. Reliance subscribers 7.26 million in 2005-06
increased to 153.25 million in 2011-12 and afterwards it continuously decreased to
0.19 million in 2017-18. Idea subscribers 2.73 million in 2005-06 increased to 211.21
million in 2017-18. BSNL subscribers 5.53 million in 2005-06 increased to 101.21
million in 2012-13 and decreased to 94.65 million in 2013-14 and afterwards it
increases to 111.68 million in 2017-18. Tata subscribers 0.63 million in 2003-04
increased to 89.14 million in 2011-12 and afterwards it continuously decreased to
31.19 million in 2017-18. Aircel subscribers 1.29 million in 2003-04 increased to
62.57 million in 2011-12 and decreased to 60.07 million in the next year of 2013-13
and again it increased to 90.90 million in 2016-17 and decreased to 74.15 million in
2017-18. Reliance JIO launched their commercial services in 2016-17 and in the
launching years it added the customer base of 108.68 million and increased to 186.56
million in million in 2017-18. The percentage share of service providers in India
2017-18 is shown in the below graph.
Graph 1.2
Share of Service Providers in 2017-18
Bharti Airtel
3.21 0.30
Hutch/
15.76 25.70
2.64 Vodafone
6.27 Reliance
RCL/RTL
9.44
18.82
Idea/ Spice/
17.8 Escotel
BSNL
0 0.02
Tata
14
From the above graph represents the Airtel is one of the leading mobile
subscriber base of 25.70 percent, followed by Vodafone 18.82 percent, Idea
17.80 percent, BSNL 9.44 percent, Aircel 6.27 percent, Unitech 3.21 percent,
Tata 2.64 percent, and MTNL 0.30 percent in the year 2017-18.
Table 1.6
List of Cellular Mobile (GSM and CDMA) Service Providers Currently
Providing Service (As On 30th March 2018)
S. Number Area of Operations
Service Providers
No. of SAs Service Area (SAs)
1 Bharthi Airtel Limited 22 All India
2 Aircel Group 22* All India
Reliance All India (except Assam and & North
3 20
Communications Ltd. East)
Kolkata, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal,
4 Reliance Telecom Ltd. 8 Himachal Pradesh, Bihar, Odisha, Assam
& North East
5 Vodafone Ltd 22 All India
All India except Assam, North East &
6 Tata Teleservices Ltd 19
Jammu & Kashmir
7 IDEA Cellular Ltd 22# All India
Delhi, Kolkata, Gujarat, Karnataka,
Tamil Nadu (incl. Chennai), Kerala,
8 Sistema ShyamTelelink 9
Uttar Pradesh (West), Rajasthan, West
Bengal
Bharat Sanchar Nigam
9 20^ All India (except Delhi & Mumbai)
Ltd.
Mahanagar Telephone
10 2^ Delhi and Mumbai
Nigam Ltd.
Telenor Maharashtra, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh,
11 Communication (India) 6 Uttar Pradesh (West), Uttar Pradesh
Pvt. Ltd. (East), Bihar
RelianceJioInfocomm
12 22 All India
Ltd
Source: TRAI Report 2018
(*) TN and AP – CMTS
(#) Delhi, HP and UP (E) – CMTS
(^) BSNL/MTNL – CMTS in all LSAs In the remaining LSAs the TSPs have either
UASL, UL or UL(AS).
15
1.4CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1.5CUSTOMER PREFERENCES
Customer preferenceis the expectations of the consumer likes and dislikes,
motivations and inclinations that drive the buying decisions. They complement
customer desire in explaining customer behavior. If a customer desire in
telecommunication and they prefer the quality of services, data network, schemes and
offer particular style, brand name etc.,
Consumer preference is defined as the subjective tastes of individual
customers, measured by their satisfaction with these items once they have purchased
them. This satisfaction is commonly referred to as utility.
Consumer preferences are measured by the satisfaction of a particular item,
compared to the opportunity cost of that item since whenever you purchase one item;
you forfeit the opportunity to buy a competing item.
the requirement of the marketer. Information Technology has changed the present
socioeconomic environment enormously. The expanded horizon of
telecommunication has led to a substantial increase in cellular services.
The present study has some innovative aspects towards the customers‟
preferences such as their sensitive reactions in the form of shifting the other network
in to the JIO network. The study brings out the factors influence to select the present
network of JIO subscribers. The study also reveals the customers' influence and
satisfaction towards Reliance JIO network service providers in Chennai city.
enormous potential. The factors are contributing to the growth of the service sectors
are higher per capita income, increased time pressure, advanced in technology,
increasing competition from globally, greater life expectancy and cost-effectiveness
drives the growth of service chains network and service quality movement. Thus,
tremendous growth of service sector implies the role of marketing in terms of infinite
opportunities and implications, marketing opportunities arising from new technology,
in franchising from fewer regulations and professional restrictions in servicing
physical goods and international markets. The various factors that lead to the
satisfaction level of customers are speed, connectivity, customer care, getting new
connections, compatibility by using these factors to measure the preference and
satisfaction towards Reliance JIO network service providers in Chennai city.
to satisfy the customers and get their loyalty through innovative products. The
innovative technology is primarily considered as orientation towards customer
satisfaction, loyalty and to gain market potential that increases the market share of the
company. In addition to the signal quality, price structure, and network coverage is
always an essential criteria for selecting service providers. If any problems in the
above criteria it is very important for any customer to know where he can address his
complaints which will be given the proper consideration. Currently, this study is to
undertake to study Reliance JIO network are providing valuable service to promoting
customer satisfaction. This study is the concern for assessment of customer preference
and satisfaction on the basis of several factors like service preferences,
innovativeness, service consistency, and quality of the network, pricing, and offering,
fulfillment of customer demand, value-added service and brand value.
Now-a-days customers are more dynamic as compared to the previous days
and their wants, taste, desire and preferences are changing depends upon trend
available in the market. Hence, the development of the mobile industry is mainly
based on customer satisfaction. In this backdrop, an attempt is made to study the
Reliance JIO network service throws insight into the customer preferences, factors
influencing to select the services and satisfaction of the services and in addition, may
suggest enhancements inappropriate measures for better functionality and/or
serviceability. Such a study may also manifest the opportunities and puts forward
possible corrective and control measures to be taken in future. Thus, it has been felt
by the researcher to carry out the current study on customers‟ preference and
satisfaction towards Reliance JIO network service providers in Chennai city.
In this context, the following questions were raised:
1. Which is mostly preferred by the JIOcustomers?
2. Whichfactors influencing of the RelianceJIO network services?
3. Whether the service provided by the JIO Network is satisfiedare not for the
customers?
4. Is there any problems faced by the customers about RelianceJIO network
services in Chennai city.
Based on the objectives, the following hypotheses are concerned with the
personal (demographic) variables in relation to the research variables and the
following null hypotheses are formulated and tested:
H01: There is no significant difference betweenthe demographic
variablesand customer preferencestowards JIO network services.
H02: There is no significant difference between the demographic profile of
the respondents and factor influencing to select JIO network services.
H03: There is no significant difference between the demographic profile of
the respondents and customer satisfactionin the JIOnetwork services.
H04: There is no association between purpose using mobile phone and
satisfaction in the JIO network services.
H05: There is no significant difference between period of using mobile
phone and satisfaction in the JIO network services.
H06: There is no significant difference between demographic profile of the
respondents and customersproblemsin the JIO network services.
1.12 METHODOLOGY
The present study is aims to understanding and exploring characteristics of
customers particularly JIO network preferences and customer satisfaction. The present
study is both explorative and descriptive in nature. This study is aims to obtaining the
answers relating to the research questions. The data selected for the study are
22
Secondary Data
The secondary data has required for the study tocollect from the annual reports
of Telephone Regularity Authority of India (TRAI). The secondary data has also been
collected from Journals, year book of statistics, Indian Telecom Policy, Department of
Telecommunication, published a report of World Telecommunications Development,
Books and various websites of the cellular operators.
Sampling Procedure
The sample for the main study includes the customers who use the JIO
network connection in Chennai city. The target population for the data collection
included individuals who are using JIO network and currently residing in various
parts of Chennai city (North Chennai, South Chennai and Central Chennai,). The
samples of 800 customers have been selected from the study area of Chennai city. The
23
selected JIO customers have been distinguished into different stages. The
classification is done on the basis of geographical area and administration factors in
Chennai city. In the first stage, the Chennai city has divided into three areas of North,
South and Central places. In the second stage, 16 Taluks have been taken for the
study. In the third stage, 50 respondents are randomly selected from each Taluk in
Chennai city. All the respondents are contacted directly and the researcher explains
the purpose of the study. Almost more than eighty-five percent of the respondents
helped with willingness and provided the necessary information as given in the
Questionnaire. Therefore, the sample consists of 800 JIO network users in Chennai
city has selected for the study. The area sampling method is used to collect the datas
from Chennai city.
Table 1.7
Sample Respondents in JIO Network
S. Revenue Number of
Total
Taluk Name Respondents Rejected Percentage
No, division selected
Sample
1 Thiruvottriyur 50 9 41 6.07
2 Tondiarpet 50 11 39 5.77
Chennai
3 Madhavaram 50 9 41 6.07
North
4 Perambur 50 7 43 6.36
5 Purasawalkam 50 9 41 6.07
6 Ambattur 50 6 44 6.51
7 Ayanavaram 50 7 43 6.36
8 Chennai Aminjikkarai 50 9 41 6.07
9 Central Madhuravoyal 50 8 42 6.21
10 Mambalam 50 7 43 6.36
11 Egmore 50 7 43 6.36
12 Guindy 50 6 44 6.51
13 Mylapore 50 7 43 6.36
Chennai
14 Velachery 50 5 45 6.66
South
15 Alandur 50 8 42 6.21
16 Sholinganallur 50 9 41 6.07
Total 800 124 676 100.00
1.16.3 Price
Price is the amount paid for obtaining to access the usage of network services.
1.16.7 Service
“A service is a package of specific and implicit advantages performed with a
supporting facility and using facilitating goods”. Service isrelating to primary or
supplementary activity that does not directly produce a physical product - that is, the
non-goods a part of the transaction between customer and provider" (Payne, 1993)
Table 1.8
Reliability Test
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's Number
Factors Based on
Alpha Standardized Items of Items
Customer Preference on JIO
0.776 0.762 9
Telecommunication?
Consumers Preference with Brand
0.801 0.807 5
Name and Acceptance
Personal Factors influencing to
0.715 0.720 4
select the JIO services
Non-Personal Factors influencing to
0.773 0.776 5
select the JIO services
Purchase Decision based on service
factors influencing to select the JIO 0.861 0.863 9
services
Satisfaction level of Core Services
0.841 0.842 6
Offered by JIO Network
Satisfaction level of Supplementary
0.771 0.743 12
Services Offered by the JIO Network
Communication Problems 0.608 0.685 5
Problems in Price/Tariff Structure 0.651 0.652 4
Problems in Customer Care 0.791 0.799 4
Problems Faced in Value Added
0.657 0.660 5
Service
Call center Problems 0.922 0.921 7
Source: Computed from Primary Data
The Table 1.2 shows the Cronbach‟s alpha valueshows the maximum
level of internal consistency for all the variables of customer preferences on
JIOservices, consumers preference with brand name on JIOservices, personal factors
influencing to select the JIO services, non-personal factors influencing to select the
JIO services, purchase decision based on service factors influencing to select the JIO
services, satisfaction level of core services offered by JIO network, and satisfaction
level of supplementary services offered by the JIO network services on Chennai city.
Similarly, the variables of problems on JIO network communication problems,
problems in price/tariff structure, problems in customer care, problems faced in value
added service and call center problems.
1. The finding depends purely based on the opinion of the respondent, which
could be based on nature.
2. Due to time constraints, the researchers covered only Chennai city.
3. Mobile phone, cell phone and cellular service terms used interchangeably.
4. The study is mainly based on the random sampling method. Hence, the
findings of the study cannot be universal.
1.24CHAPTER ARRANGEMENT
The present study is organized into five chapters as follows:
The first chapter “Introduction and Research Design”, The introduction
includes the growth of telecommunication in India, privatization, mobile phone
generations, a growth of telephone users and cellular service providers in India and
RelianceJIO users.This research design includes concept, need for the study,
statement of the problem, review of literature, objectives of the study, hypotheses of
the study, operational definitions, methodology, scope of the study, period of study,
sampling design, study area, pilot study, data collection, tools used for analysis and
interpretation, limitations of the study and scheme of reporting.