PENNED BY J.

M LOPE

 G.R. No. 244374. February 15, 2022

PUREGOLD PRICE CLUB, INC., Petitioner, v. COURT OF APPEALS AND RENATO M.

CRUZ, JR., Respondents.

 [ G.R. No. 256177. June 27, 2022 ]

PIONEER INSURANCE & SURETY CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. THE
INSURANCE COMPANY, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CLEARWATER
INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

 G.R. No. 207853. March 20, 2022

CLARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, AND GOVERNANCE
COMMISSION FOR GOCCS (GOVERNMENT-OWNED AND-CONTROLLED
CORPORATIONS), PETITIONER-INTERVENOR, VS. ASSOCIATION OF CDC
SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL UNION, Respondent.

 [ GR No. 256177, Jun 27, 2022 ]

PIONEER INSURANCE v. INSURANCE COMPANY

 [ G.R. No. 253821. March 06, 2023 ]

SUGAR REGULATORY ADMINISTRATION, PETITIONER, VS. CENTRAL
AZUCARERA DE BAIS INC.,* RESPONDENT.

 GR No. 252940, Apr 05, 2022 ]

CENTRAL BAY RECLAMATION v. COA

 [ G.R. No. 244155, May 11, 2021 ]

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSION ON
ELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. MARIA NORINA S. TANGARO-
CASINGAL, ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE LAW DEPARTMENT, RESPONDENT.
[G.R. No. 247508]
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. MARIA NORINA S.
TANGARO-CASINGAL, DIRECTOR IV OF THE LAW DEPARTMENT,
PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT

 [ G.R. No. 215159. July 05, 2022 ]

CHEVRON HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY CALTEX ASIA LIMITED), PETITIONER,
VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

 G.R. No. 215159. July 05, 2022

CHEVRON HOLDINGS, INC. (FORMERLY CALTEX ASIA LIMITED), Petitioner, v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

 G.R. No. 244155, May 11, 2021COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ONELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ATTY.
MARIA NORINA S. TANGARO- CASINGAL,ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE
LAW DEPARTMENT, Respondent.[G.R. No. 247508]COMMISSION ON
ELECTIONS, REPRESENTED BY ATTY. MARIA NORINA S.TANGARO-
 CASINGAL, DIRECTOR IV OF THE LAW DEPARTMENT, Petitioner,
v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

 G.R. No. 230648. October 06, 2021 ]

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. THE PROVINCE OF
PAMPANGA AND PIA MAGDALENA D. QUIBAL, RESPONDENTS