Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAW6254 - Regulatory Framework and Legal Issues in Business
LAW6254 - Regulatory Framework and Legal Issues in Business
• Merchants or business owners who preferred to do business with a partner, rather than opt
to sole proprietorship, are bound to share and contribute an amount of resources to what is
called a common fund. Both, or all owners of the business are called partners or co-owners
(Toughnickel, 2020 as cited from Uniform Partnership Act, Sec.6).
• Common fund is a strategy in investing that makes use of contracts rather than relying on
insurance policy, trust or corporation. It allows equal benefits to be gained by the co-
owners/ partners in a business as an investment return (Tatum, 2020). Profits gained from
the business through partnership will be equally divided to its co-owners yet for some
instances it is not always the case. Partners are also expected to agree on terms regarding
matters about the business. As there is a common fund, there should also be a common
goal for partnerships to flourish. In some circumstances partnership starts with the goal of
exercising a similar or related profession.
◦ Examples:
▪ A construction firm owned by an engineer and an architect
▪ A day care owned by group of teachers
▪ An accounting firm owned by accountants and auditors
• Partnership in business doesn’t just start by saying “We got this”, or “We should be
partners” to one another in just an utterance without performing any formal conversation
about it. Partnership follows a set of rules or mandates from the law, in order to be
considered as formal “partnership.” As it was stated from R.A 386 Civil Code of the
Philippines Article 1769, in order to determine if a partnership exists in a business, the
following rules shall apply:
◦ Except as provided by article 1825, persons who are not partners as to each other are
not partners as to third persons;
▪ If there is no mutual agreement that the first person is a partner to the second and
vice versa, then no other person should treat them or recognize them as partners.
▪ Partnership should be consensual (Soriano, 2016).
◦ Co-ownership or co-possession does not of itself establish a partnership, whether such
co-owners or co-possessors do or do not share any profits made by the use of the
property;
◦ The sharing of gross returns does not of itself establish a partnership, whether or not the
persons sharing them have a joint or common right or interest in any property from
which the returns are derived;
◦ The receipt by a person of a share of the profits of a business is prima facie evidence
that he is a partner in the business,
▪ The acceptance of profit share by the other party gives the impression that two or
more persons have established a business partnership except when it would be given
as a form of payment as it was stated below.
• but no such inference shall be drawn if such profits were received in payment:
◦ As a debt by installments or otherwise;
◦ As wages of an employee or rent to a landlord:
◦ As an annuity to a widow or representative of a deceased partner;
◦ As interest on a loan, though the amount of payment varies with the profits
of the business;
◦ As the consideration for the sale of a goodwill of a business or other property
by installments or otherwise.
• According to Fidelito Soriano, contract of partnership should be:
◦ Consensual in nature, for it was agreed upon by everyone in the involved parties;
◦ Principal, that it stands as an independent entity;
◦ Bilateral and Multilateral, that both interests and concerns of all parties are properly
reciprocated;
◦ Nominated, that it carries a distinct name as per the law
◦ Well-prepared, that it is a business to be pursued and injected with other contracts as it
approaches growth and;
◦ Onerous, that the business owners invests resources to constitute the common fund
• There are four types of Partnerships according to the general provisions of R.A. 386 Civil
Code of the Philippines Article 1776-1777:
◦ As to Object:
▪ Universal Partnership
• As it was stated in US Legal, this partnership demonstrates two or more persons
agreeing to allocate their individual properties and resources for the gain of the
business partnership
▪ Particular Partnership
• This type of partnership is focused only in fulfilling a certain venture or
milestone, once it is achieved then the partnership will be dissolved.
◦ As Regards the Liability of the Partners:
▪ General Partnership
• This partnership is not eyeing a particular or single venture, this opt to pursue an
unlimited liability, which means any party involved in the partnership are open
for lawsuit cases, if ever the business undergoes conflict (Bloomenthal, 2020).
• Limited Partnership
◦ This partnership has two kinds of partner or co-owner, one general partner who
has an unlimited liability of a business and a limited partner, who is not always a
part of business management process, therefore this partner holds limited
liability to the business as well.
• Apart from knowing what partnership is, it is also right and just that we make ourselves
familiar with our rights as a partner in a business. As it was stated in Article 1810 of R.A.
386 Civil Code of the Philippines, the main property rights of a partner are the following:
◦ His rights in specific partnership property;
▪ Example:
• If Juan and Juana are business partners in establishing a Coffee Shop, it is both
their right to own a property subject to the partnership, just like a part of the land
where the shop is located, only if, both agreed upon such circumstance.
▪ His interest in the partnership;
• Article 1812: A partner’s interest in the partnership is his share of profits and
surplus.
◦ Example:
▪ Ms. Rose has the right to get her share of the monthly profits of their
growing salon business from her partner, Mr. Luck, as well as the
remaining unused tools in the salon.
▪ His right to participate in the management;
• A partner of a business should not be denied of his/her right to hold a position in
managing the business.
◦ Example:
▪ If a chef wants to be the menu planner for the restaurant he and his
friends established, it is his right to demand it from his partner, as it is his
way of helping in managing the business.
Partnership Programs
• It is true that business has its many complexities, some are actually discussed in the first
parts of this module, but we got to understand that it is how it works. In order for a
partnered business to flourish, it is governed by regulations and ultimately it is subjected to
the following partnership programs that we will discuss in this part of the module.
• Partner/ Partnership programs are a strategic step in business where merchants comes up
with ways of attracting or encouraging other individuals to take part with the business and
market its goods and services (Rouse, 2018). It is like creating or building networks inside
a business.
• Partnership Program is one of the many reasons why partnership is a good and powerful
thing. You can actually make quick initial differences in your business through these
programs. In so many ways it can increase your sales, it can make your customer reach
wider and it will lend you a helping hand in carrying out your business goals.
◦ Public and Private Partnership (PPP)
▪ One of the biggest and most known partnership programs was PPP or Public-
Private-Partnership, a partnership made between the Philippine £government and
the private business firms.
▪ Public-Private partnership is vastly focused on projects concerning the building of
infrastructures, from facilities down to services. It is an agreement made between
the government and private firms bound by a signed contract. The private sector
serves as investors to make the projects possible. It allows divided risk allocation on
both public and private entities, minimizes cost while achieving development on
proposed projects and it paves the way for funding other equally important priorities
of the public office.
▪ Below is a graph showing the arrangement on how Public-Private Partnership carry
out duties in establishing a project, as cited from Jeffrey Delmon’s, Understanding
Options for Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure, World Bank, year 2010.
◦ As it was shown in the graph above, you can see that the spectrum was divided into
three brackets such as:
▪ Public Owns and Operate Assets
▪ Public-Private Partnership
▪ Private Sector Owns and Operates Assets
◦ The first stage of the spectrum includes the management of utility, restructuring,
corporatization and decentralization which are solely put as a duty or work of the
public sector only. It also includes arrangements on Civil Works and Service
Contracts. Once these are settled and accomplished already, then the concept of
partnership begins. As you can see, in the middle part of the spectrum, there is
already a collaboration of efforts that will happen between the public and the private
bodies. This will include everything about management and operating contracts, as
well as leases and affermage. Also, concessions, build-operate- transfer (BOT),
design-build-operate (DBO) concerns are under the duty of collaborating effort
from both public and private sector. On the last stage, the duty will be left to the
private firm only. The private sector will be the one to deal with the concerns on
Joint Ventures (JV) and Partial Divestiture of Public Assets, as well as dwellings on
Privatization and Full Divestiture.
◦ Below the spectrum is a line pointing on both ends, this shows the amount of
engagement or involvement the private sector will play in the whole process of
carrying out the project. As it was said on the explanation above, the first stage
would only need the efforts from the public sector, that’s why the extent of
participation expected from the private is characterized as low. On the second stage,
collaboration and cooperation in dealing with concerns were already established,
that is why the level of participation from both public and private sectors has
already achieved its equilibrium. On the latter part of the spectrum, duties were left
out to the hands of the private sector so that its level of engagement reached its high
status.
• Partnership for Growth (PFG) Program
◦ Partnership for Growth Programs aims to put attention to the economic growth and
development constraints happening in the nation. It is an agreement and partnership
made between the Philippine government and the United States government. On-
going projects under this program were patterned along four thematic areas:
▪ Regulatory Quality
▪ Rule of Law and Anti-corruption Enforcement
▪ Fiscal Space
▪ Human Capital Development
◦ This program is driven to gain further investments both within the nation and
overseas. It is also patterned to make trade flourish. These are the reasons why the
Philippine Government is trying to heighten capabilities of manpower to aid high-
growth sectors, make progress on the climate of investing in the nation, and ensure
that internationally accepted standards are being strictly followed as import
regulation. The Philippine Government has also stepped up in easing restrictions for
market entry and decrease cost of business practice.
Guide Questions and Answers
• Regulatory Framework and Partnership Programs: Definition and Overview
◦ What comprises the Regulatory Framework for Business?
▪ Regulatory framework for business comprises the laws, policies, rules, regulations
and regulatory boards and processes bound to be followed by current and future
business owners as it was mandated by the Philippines Constitution.
◦ Why do we have to educate ourselves about this matter? Will it make a difference in
our everyday living?
▪ It is just right to educate ourselves of matters concerning the regulatory framework
in business, whether or not we are already business affiliated individuals or
consumers, so that we can avoid future conflicts and mishaps to happen while we
run a business or when we consume a product or service from a certain business
enterprise.
• Partnership Programs in the Philippines
◦ What are the advantages of putting up a business in a partnership-oriented set-up?
▪ It is advantageous in a sense that you get to have bigger capital, you got someone to
share ideas with, liabilities will not just be shouldered by you, and management will
never just base on a single point of view of an owner.
◦ In your own understanding, why were partnership programs deemed to be important?
▪ Partnership programs are important for these are programs that kept businesses
sustained and carried out especially when it concerns bigger sums of capitals and
projects, particularly national projects. It becomes an aid to suffice monetary and
non-monetary needs of a certain project.
Purpose Exemptions
• It is not out of our conscious minds that government projects were funded by the tax being
paid by the people. But not everyone is subjected to pay tax, for we have this so-called
purpose exemption.
• Purpose exemption, also termed tax exemption, pertains to transactions, income, or types
of businesses that are exempted or free of tax or compulsory payment of tax, both at the
state or local level.
• Transactions, income, or types of business exempted from paying state or local tax should
and only be mandated by the law or constitution as a majority decision of Congress. If the
law orders to revoke the tax exemption based on violation of certain provisions, then you
are obliged to pay tax already.
• In a sense, tax is the fee given involuntarily by individuals, businesses, institutions,
corporations, and such who and which are not included in the list of tax-exempted entities
in state or local government. This is technically being used to fund public and
governmental projects.
• Exemption to the payment of tax is deemed to be close to the concept of privilege,
especially when it is given abiding by the rules of contract, which most of the time applies
to corporations.
• Note that purpose exemption or tax exemption should not be interchanged with the concept
of the tax deduction, for they are two different things.
• Exempted from Paying Taxes
◦ Tax exemption is not simply applicable to all. According to Section 30 of the Tax Code
of the Philippines, there are only some who will be granted this exemption. Here are
some individuals or institutions which are exempted from compulsory state or local
fees, also known as tax, as cited from Tax Accounting Center website:
▪ An individual whose taxable income does not exceed P250,000.
▪ Churches and buildings used for carrying our religious duties.
▪ Educational institutions, as long as its non-stock, non-profit.
▪ Labor, an agricultural and horticultural institution not established after the goal of
gaining profit.
▪ Some mutual savings banks and cooperative banks without capital stocks and are
used for mutual purposes.
▪ Company cemetery used as benefits for its members.
▪ Non-profit business league, chamber of commerce, and board of trade.
▪ Non-stock beneficiary societies such as a fraternal organization that operates for the
benefit of its members.
▪ Social welfare promoting civic leagues or organizations.
▪ Farmers, irrigation companies, typhoon and fire insurance companies or other
organizations of local characters whose fees or profits just constitute meeting its
expenses.
▪ Organizations that were established to help increase sales through the marketing of
farmer’s products.
• Although it was mentioned above that some non-stock non-profit businesses or
organizations are exempted from paying tax, the following businesses are not included
from being tax-exempted establishments despite the possibility of being non-stock,
non-profit as per certain Revenue Memorandum Circulars:
◦ Operating clubs that are organized for recreation, pleasure, and entertainment
purposes as stated from Revenue Memorandum Circular no. 35-2012.
◦ Under Condominium Act, condominium companies are not exempted from paying
taxes as per Revenue Memorandum Circular no. 65-2012.
Insurance
• Putting up a business equates to risk-taking. It is a complex field that needs a lot of
thinking in order to be established. It also involves a lot of financial investments that
business owners cannot afford to put to waste. Because of this circumstance, insurance
becomes an avenue to help in managing the risks of running a business.
• Insurance is your protection against financial losses in case unexpected negative events
happen to you or to the business you’ve put up in the future. If you fail to buy or avail
yourself of insurance, you will be the one who will shoulder all related costs when
something unfortunate happens.
• Insurance is a written contract or agreement between the policy owner and the insurance
company. Both person and companies can be subjected to insurance.
• Take note that before availing of any insurance policy, make sure that you do your research
about your prospective insurance provider so as not to be a victim of scamming in this
aspect.
• There is a lot of insurance in this life, but we are just going to focus on business-related
insurances that we need to protect our businesses with. Located on the next page are brief
discussions of different business-related insurances that we all need to know.
• Below are the different types of insurance that also apply to different types of businesses.
Let us take a look at what these insurances are as cited from Entrepreneur: Asia Pacific.
◦ Property Insurance
▪ If unfortunate events like flooding, theft, fire, and such happen, everything you own
inside your company building or area is insured, from equipment to furniture.
◦ Worker's Compensation Insurance
▪ In case accidents happen to your employees within working hours and vicinity, this
insurance will cover the worker's hospitalization or medical fees, disability, and
even death benefits.
◦ Product Liability Insurance
▪ When your business involve the marketing of products to the general public, this
will help you face lawsuits in order to cover all the damage your product may have
caused a customer.
◦ Business Interruption Insurance
▪ This type of insurance will help you recover from the loss of income because of the
inability of your manpower to work in the field due to catastrophic circumstances.
◦ Professional Liability Insurance
▪ In case there will be negligence, error, or mistakes committed by anyone who is part
of the business, this type of insurance will help the business recover from the
damage it has cost. This policy is customized to the characteristics and kind of
business you may have.
◦ Vehicle Insurance
▪ Company vehicles or vehicles used to fulfill duties regarding your business should
also be insured in case unfortunate accidents happen to cover repairs and third-party
damages the accident will cause.
◦ Home-Based Insurance
▪ This insurance protects those working from home, business owners or home-bound
businesses to cover unexpected liabilities involving their business or their
equipment and inventory in case something happens.
• This year’s regulatory landscape of business organizations was dominated by the following
themes as it was stated in an article cited from ey.com authored by Marc Saidenberg et al.
◦ Operational Resilience
▪ Operational resilience has been a focus this 2020 for issues in information
technology have emerged, just like cyber security and IT failures. This may have
been driven by the mobilization of systems and data due to the on-going pandemic
that forced people to work from home.
◦ Environmental, Social and Governance Criteria, and Societal Issues
▪ The emergence of crisis also paved the way for societal issues to come out on the
surface and be talked about. Even the ESG criteria which were used to measure if
an investment is sustainable and ethical, also undergone a whole new challenge.
Unexpected events set new expectations for business enterprises in maintaining a
sustainable and ethical environment.
◦ Evolving and Emerging of Data and Technologies
▪ This year, AI or Artificial Intelligence and MI or Machine Intelligence have been
the subject of the spotlight for most businesses shifting to AI and MI controlled
systems. Because of this, business experts are trying to anticipate and prepare for
the risks that the use of AI and MI in carrying out business processes may bring.
◦ Post Crisis Issue
▪ When the crisis finally comes to an end, it doesn’t mean it is also the end of
struggles for the business industry. The business industry still needs to work on and
enhance policies and regulations in order to avoid business-related crimes.
Regulating Competition or Anti-Trust Law
• Competition is unavoidable in the business industry. Regardless of how unique and
original your business idea may be, competitors will still emerge and try to compete with
you in the business. This aspect of the business is also being regulated abided by the
contents of the law.
• Business Competition
◦ Business competition is the rivalry between two or more companies or business
enterprises of the same field and industry who offer the same products and services.
Some, who are not really that immersed in business might take competition as
something that is fully negative, yet it is not. One of the common misconceptions with
business competition is that it just causes one business sales to drop down, or it just
divides the attention of the consumers, but no. Business competition actually
contributes a fair share of beneficial effects to the business industry, and we are going
to discuss that in the latter part this module.
• Types of Business Competition
◦ Competition doesn’t just come in a single form. It comes in 4 major types, namely:
▪ Perfect Competition
• A competition is perfect when:
◦ Products are alike, homogenous or a commodity
◦ If all firms don't have any control over the market prices of their products
◦ Consumers know everything about the product being marketed
◦ There is no cost for entrance and exit in the market
◦ Prices are not influenced by market shares
◦ Labor resources should be mobile
▪ Example:
• Foreign Exchange Industry
▪ Monopolistic Competition
• A competition is considered a monopolistic competition when:
◦ There are many sellers
◦ Products have variations though they serve a similar purpose
◦ Has little power in raising product prices
◦ There is a strong advertising strategy being laid out
▪ Example:
• Restaurants
▪ Oligopoly
• A competition is considered oligopoly when:
◦ There are few sellers
◦ Firms supply large amounts or portions of products
◦ Formation and dissolution are greatly influenced by economic, legal, and
ethical factors
◦ Somewhat restricts fixed prices for greater returns
▪ Example:
• Airline Industry
▪ Monopoly
• A business is considered a monopoly if:
◦ There is only one seller.
◦ Barriers of entry are very high.
◦ Seller decides the price of the service or product
▪ Example:
• Microsoft
• Advantages and Disadvantages of Competition in Business
◦ It was mentioned in the former parts of this module that competition in business is not
all thorns and struggles: instead, it also paves the way for many beneficial effects. Let
us take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of competition in both business and
consumer.
▪ Advantages of Competition
• Awakens the drive of the business to step up and improve products and services.
• Prices of products drop.
• Consumption rate will increase.
• Better products are being developed because of product differentiation.
• Boosts awareness that a certain product exists and is available to be consumed.
• Increases company profits due to low cost in manufacturing the product.
• Consumers get to have more options.
• Consumer needs will most likely be met.
▪ Disadvantages of Competition
• Reduces market share.
• Purchasing decision will be complicated for consumers.
• It may shrink small businesses.
• It may discourage or intimidate other would-be businesses to operate.
• May lead to customer exploitation.
Lesson 4 - Regulating Competition or the Anti-Trust Law and Financial and Securities
Regulation
Anti-Trust Law
• Business operations are very critical. It takes a lot of things to consider before putting up a
business, and once you are able to put it up and establish its name, competitors emerge,
and it is perfectly fine. What is not fine and should be watched out for in the business
industry are the practices that harm healthy competition, those unfair business practices
that endanger the welfare of both consumers and fair businesses. In these situations, the
essence of Anti-trust law is very much useful.
• Anti-Trust Law is a set of laws or policies formulated and implemented by governments
that aim to maintain honest and fair business competition within a nation. It serves as an
interference to possible unlawful monopolies that will greatly harm the consumers. Its
mission involves keeping low and reasonable prices of products arid services without
compromising its quality.
• In essence, “trusts” in the term, Anti-trust refers to the business entities or companies who
merge with each other to create a monopoly and influence the pricing of goods in the
market. Simply, Anti-trust means against predators and abusive monopolistic and unlawful
companies.
• Questionable Practices in Business
◦ According to an article by James Chen, cited from Investopedia, some of the target
unlawful activities of companies that Anti-trust law aims to stop include, but are not
restricted to, concerns on market allocation, bid-rigging, price-fixing, and monopolies.
Let us discover further details about these and how they differ from each other.
▪ Market Allocation
• In Market Allocation, as the term suggests, there will be an allocation or
restriction that will happen among members of the competition. What will be the
things that will be allocated or restricted? It can be the type of consumers, the
products or the geographical location or territories where businesses market their
products or services. This removes competition that paves the way for higher
profit and pricing of goods.
◦ Example:
▪ Royals Company and Crown Company agreed on terms that they will
divide the type of customers they will accommodate in their shops.
Royals Company will be catering to the student customers, while Crown
Company will cater to the office workers. They will deny accommodation
to customers that do not belong to the type of customer assigned to them.
Because of this, competition between the two companies will no longer
exist.
▪ Bid Rigging
• In Bid rigging, the members of the competition will conspire to let a single
member win in the bidding process. In return, the winning bidder will let the
conspiring bidders win the next project. Through this, they prevent the existence
of competition without compromising their market shares and price.
◦ Example:
▪ Alliance Corp., Builders Corp., and Titanium Corp. are all infrastructure
companies that aim to secure projects in building public highways. They
agreed to let Alliance Corp. win the bid by bidding low, giving off the
project to Alliance. On the next project, it will be Builders turn to win;
then, on the third, it will be Titanium’s. This way, all three companies get
to secure projects, driving away the competition.
▪ Price Fixing
• Price fixing scheme involves intentional price suggested by the companies
themselves who actually have the same products to secure profitability among
companies who are members of the competition.
◦ Example:
▪ Bright Company agreed with Pleasant Company to sell their goods at the
same price level, which can be higher than the reasonable price so that
customers will not have any choice but to just buy products from either of
the two companies. This way, both companies get to earn a large amount
of profit from the higher prices they have sold their products for.
▪ Monopolies
• As was stated in the previous module, a monopoly has something to do with a
single company dominating the whole market share. It may be driven by the
high cost of getting into the kind of business venture, causing one company to
maintain supremacy in that industry. It just becomes unlawful when the
following happens:
◦ If the monopolistic company refuses to accept deals with potential operating
companies in order to avoid competition.
◦ If sales of two or more products are tied together, consumers will have no
choice but to buy everything.
◦ If there is predation in pricing of the goods.
◦ If the company’s supplier is restricted to sell to other companies.
▪ Example:
• One of the examples that can fall under this circumstance is the case
of Microsoft during the 90's.
• Provisions Stated in the Act with regards to Consumer Product and Quality
◦ As cited from R.A. 7394, Chapter I, Article 5, the following are the duties of the state
to its consumers:
▪ To develop and provide safety and quality standards for consumer products,
including performance or use-oriented standards, codes of practice and methods of
tests;
▪ To assist the consumer in evaluating the quality, including safety, performance, and
comparative utility of consumer products;
▪ To protect the public against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer
products;
▪ To undertake research on quality improvement of products and investigation into
causes and prevention of product related deaths, illness and injuries;
▪ To assure the public of the consistency of standardized products.
• The above-mentioned provisions emphasized aspects such as standard, quality,
and risks that all businesses should bear in mind in delivering and marketing
their products and services to the market. The conduct of research was also
mentioned, for it will best figure out if a certain product is harmful or not to the
consumers that will potentially purchase it. Standards are also a good point to be
taken care of: products and services shall meet a certain standard so that they
will be considered a product of quality.
• Government Agencies or Departments involved in ensuring the above-mentioned
Provisions are being met by Businesses
▪ According to the provisions stated in R.A. 7394, Chapter I, Article 6, the following
are the government departments involved in taking part in protecting the consumers
of the state, specifically, in line with the provisions above:
• The Department of Health with respect to food, drugs, cosmetics, devices and
substances;
• The Department of Agriculture with respect to products related to agriculture;
• The Department of Trade and Industry with respect to other consumer products
not specified above.
• Things that the above-mentioned Government Agencies should check to consider a product
to be safe for sale in the Market
◦ The following are the things that a product should meet so it can be considered an
approved product to be legally purchased by people:
▪ Requirements as to performance, composition, contents, design, construction,
finish, packaging of a consumer product;
▪ Requirements as to kind, class, grade, dimensions, weights, material;
▪ Requirements as to the method of sampling, tests and codes used to check the
quality of the product;
▪ Requirements as to precautions in storage, transporting and packaging;
▪ Requirements that a consumer product be marked with or accompanied by clear and
adequate safety warnings or instructions, or requirements respecting the form of
warnings or instructions (as cited from R.A. 7394, Chapter 1, Article 7).
• The above-mentioned provisions are just some of the provisions stated in the
Republic Act 7394 or Consumer Act of the Philippines of 1991, which will
guide us on our rights as consumers of the state.
Philippines Coconut
Coconut-based products
Authority
Lesson 9 - Analysis of Selected Business Legal Cases, Ethical Issues of the Cases, and
Identifying Essential Facts
Selected Business Legal Case
• Business, as has been proven from the previous modules, is really a complex thing. It
involves a lot of aspects for it to be considered an official and lawful business. Therefore,
if things happen that a business entity violates a law, more so that it harms the interest of
another business, it will be subjected to complaints, which will then build up into a case
that needs to be settled in court.
• Legal cases involving business take a lot of time to be processed. It is subjected to a series
of trials, investigations, or hearings. Evidence is also deemed important to settle these
kinds of matters.
• As it was researched, we have come up to discuss a case that actually happened in the
actual Philippines business setting regarding consumer complaints. Here is the case that we
will be discussing further in this module:
• The case that we will be discussing in this module is under General Register No. 233073,
dated February 14, 2018.
• It is between L.C. Big Mak Burger, Inc. as a petitioner (the one who filed the case) against
McDonald’s Corporation as the respondent (the one complained).
• This case was cited from The LawPhil Project Arellano Law Foundation, a website.
• This contains the Decision of the Republic of the Philippines, Supreme Court Manila, First
Division.
• This case was spearheaded by Associate Justice Noel Gimenez Tijam.
• Digging In to the Case
• This case is a petition for review on Certiorari, meaning it is a case where the Supreme
Court (a higher court) reviews the lower court’s decision on this case.
• This case began on February 2, 2017, and the resolution date was July 25, 2017, by the
Court of Appeals.
• Identifying Essential Facts on the Case
◦ Here are the factual antecedents of the case L.C. Big Mak Burger, Inc., Petitioner vs.
McDonald's Corporation, Respondent.
• The petition to the case began with the Civil Case No. 90-1507 filed in the Regional
Trial Court of Makati City, Branch 137 (Infringement Court) with which McDonald’s
Corporation (respondent) filed a case of trademark infringement and unfair competition
against L.C. Big Mak Burger, Inc. (petitioner).
• Do not be confused with the terms respondent for McDonald’s and petitioner for L.C.
Big Mak: those were the status and role of the two parties in this petition case.
• ln the previous case where the two parties were involved, the court ordered the
petitioner or the L.C. Big Mak Inc. to cease from practicing particular actions under the
issuance of the writ of preliminary injunction (this means a court order an individual or
entity to perform or restrain from doing a specific act).
• L.C. Big Mak Inc was ordered to refrain from using any term that may associate or
confuse their products originating from the McDonalds Corp. It emphasized that the
petitioner (L.C. Big Mak Inc) should especially cease the use of the mark “Big Mak” in
particular.
• Also, the court ordered the petitioner (L.C. Big Mak Inc.) to cease any market action
that may lead to professing that the respondent (McDonald Corp.) took part in
manufacturing the goods they produce.
• The Infringement Court also ordered that petitioner cease the use, direct or indirect, of
any term or mark that may associate their company, product, or services to the
respondent in places under and within the jurisdiction of the National Capital Judicial
Region.
• Once the trial ended, the court made a decision to dispose of the case where the
respondent’s side was the one favored (McDonald’s Corporation and McGeorge Food
Industries Inc.) against the petitioner (L.C. Big Mak Burgers, Inc).
• Contents of the Court's Decision in Favor of the Respondents
◦ The issued writ of a preliminary injunction in the case was made permanent.
• The petitioner was ordered to pay certain amounts as compensation for actual damages,
exemplary damages, attorney's fees, and fees of litigation to the respondent.
• Complaints and counterclaims made against the defendants, who happen to be the
people on the side of the petitioner, are declared dismissed for lack of merit and
sufficient evidence.
• Though the CA overturned and released another decision regarding this case, the
Supreme Court eventually reinstated the Infringement’s Court Decision with which the
instant petition was granted and the decision to find the respondent liable for trademark
infringement competition and unfair competition as the respondent filed.
• Unfair Competition
◦ In the previous plight of this case, it actually began with the issue of unfair competition
filed against L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc. by McDonald’s Corp. An issue of unfair
competition was established because both parties are into the food service industry,
therefore, these are considered competing establishments or entities in the food selling
market. It became a case when confusion happened with regards to the marks being
similarly used in the operations of both firms. It also includes or is associated with the
issue of Trademark Infringement.
◦ Because of this case filed by the respondent against the petitioner, here are the previous
decisions made by the Infringement court about it:
• Indirect Contempt
◦ Indirect contempt is a term used to describe a situation wherein a certain firm or entity
is alleged to disrespect the decisions of the ruling court by disobeying the orders it
released as well as ignoring the weight of its decisions.
◦ This issue emerged when the McDonald’s Corp. filed a Petition of Contempt against
the L.C. Big Mak Burger Corp. for it stated that the petitioner:
• Whereas the response of the L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc. to these allegations contains:
• Though the court's initial decision about this is in favor of the petitioner L.C. Big Mak
Burger Inc., eventually it was reversed, resulting in the following decision:
Lesson 10 - Relevant Laws, Analysis of the Court, Judiciary Procedures, and Court
Decision Analysis and Reflection
Relevant Laws in the Case
• Laws are a very relevant aspect of a case. This contains the provisions for all fields of
living. Business laws involve the laws needed in the case that we will be discussing in this
module.
• A case will never be a case without laws; there would not be any complaints if there were
no laws being violated. In this module, we will discuss the particular laws involved in the
case of McDonald’s Corp. vs. L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc. which was a petition case after a
series of other cases regarding this matter.
• The Law on Indirect Contempt
◦ The current petition case that we are discussing right now is just focused on the issue of
indirect contempt as accused by the respondent, McDonald’s Corporation, towards the
petitioner, L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc. Other cases regarding Unfair Competition and
Trademark Infringement are deemed to be excluded in this petition.
▪ After a charge in writing has been filed, and an opportunity given to the respondent
to comment thereon within such period as may be fixed by the court and to be heard
by himself or counsel, a person guilty of any of the following acts may be punished
for indirect contempt (cited from Section 3, Indirect Contempt to be Punished after
Charge and Hearing):
• As stated beforehand, the only issue that will be tackled in the court’s resolution
is whether or not the petitioner is guilty of accusations of indirect contempt.
• Indirect contempt is an issue under the law of the court.
• Cited from Sec. 3, Rule 71 of the Rules of Court, it is stated that the punishment
for those entities or individuals who may be proved to be guilty as charged of
indirect contempt will be imposed right after the filing of the charge and the
hearing of the case with which parties and its counsel were given the opportunity
to comment on the allegations at hand.
▪ Disobedience of or resistance to a lawful writ, process, order, or judgment of a
court, including the act of a person who, after being dispossessed or ejected from
any real property by the judgment or process of any court of competent jurisdiction,
enters or attempts or induces another to enter into or upon such real property, for the
purpose of executing acts of ownership or possession, or in any manner disturbs the
possession given to the person adjudged to be entitled thereto;
• This is one of the actions that may be punishable under indirect contempt.
• It involves the refusal to follow writs, process, order, or judgment of a court.
• It also involves those individuals and entities who ignored the order of
dispossession and ejection by the court from any property and are still in action
accessing the property to own it or possess it all over again.
• Indirect contempt also involves the act of creating disturbing actions to the
possession of an individual entitled to the property as ordered by the court.
▪ Any abuse of or any unlawful interference with the processes or proceedings of a
court not constituting direct contempt under Section 1 of this Rule;
• It also includes those acts of abuse or interference to the process of the court as
long as it is not stated to the provisions of Section 1 of the Rule of Court
regarding direct contempt.
▪ Any improper conduct tending, directly or indirectly, to impede, obstruct, or
degrade the administration of justice:
▪ But nothing in this section shall be construed as to prevent the court from issuing
process to bring the respondent into court, or from holding him in custody pending
such proceedings.
• The issue of indirect contempt also includes any improper action that is deemed
inappropriate and degrading on the part of the justice administration.
• Yet it was disclaimed by this section that these shall not be interpreted as a way
to prevent the respondent from being subjected to the court or from keeping
custody of it aligned to pending proceedings.
• Re-examination of the Orders allegedly Defied by the Petitioner
◦ To be familiarized again with the alleged issue of indirect contempt against the
petitioner, L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc., by the respondent, McDonald’s Corp. Here are
the following orders of the court alleged to be defied by the petitioner regarding this
issue:
• It was ordered by the court that the petitioner refrain or stop from using the mark “Big
Mak” in any of its fast-food restaurants or even other marks that may cause confusion
or may mislead or deceive the public of the origin of its product and services to be
related to the brand of the McDonald’s Corp.
• Also, the court ordered that the petitioner refrain from the use of the mark “Big Mak”
for it will result in unfair trade on the reputation and goodwill of the McDonald’s marks
specifically the mark “Big Mac.”
• The petitioner was also ordered to refrain from doing any activity that may involve the
sale of their products that may create an impression that it is manufactured or originally
produced by the respondent.
• The court also ordered that the petitioner refrains from any activity that may associate
the name or the brand of the respondent to any of its products and services in such
places within the National Capital Judicial Region jurisdiction.
Judiciary Procedures and Court Decision Analysis
• In order for a case to be settled, it needs to undergo judiciary procedures that will
eventually yield to a court decision, which will be the basis of the future actions or
activities of both parties. Also, these judicial procedures are very important to examine
every information and evidence presented to the court carefully. It will also give equal
opportunities for both parties to present both of their arguments to be used in the case
hearing.
• To settle the fiasco between the two entities, the petitioner, L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc., and
the respondent, McDonald’s Corp, the court facilitated a few proceedings.
• Here is the following information regarding the procedures made by the court related to the
case, also the decision of the court in line with this matter:
• The Supreme Court did not agree to the ruling made by the Court of Appeals stating that
Francis Dy mentioned it in the Judicial Affidavit that their party admitted that they just
followed the court’s order in 2009 upon receipt of the complaint from the respondent
accusing them of Indirect Contempt.
• Also, the court did not agree that the petitioner making use of their company name is an
infringement of the trademark of the respondent, making it a violator of the subject
injunction order of the court.
• To support the court’s disagreement with the impression being imparted by the respondent,
it is not true that the petitioner continued the use of the mark “Big Mak” in their
businesses.
• Evidence was actually presented before the court that the petitioner uses the mark “Super
Mak” and its corporate name L.C. Big Mak Burger Inc. in its operations and not the mark
“Big Mak” which was first ordered by the court to refrain from using.
• Also, there were no records taken that will prove Francis Dy’s admission to their
company’s compliance to the court’s decision, that it only began in 2009 under the writ of
execution issued by the then court.
• The Supreme Court assumed that the CA just misinterpreted the phrase used in the
affidavit mentioning “by early 2009.”
• In addition, the photographs presented were just captured in 2009 when there was already
an existing Writ of Execution issued in the previous resolution of the case.
• To support the Supreme Court’s statements in this part of the case, here is a portion of the
judicial affidavit made that served as the basis of the Supreme Court for disagreeing to the
initial allegations of the respondent against petitioners.
• As you can see, there were no admissions made by the petitioner, as was stated by the
Court of Appeals.
• The petitioner’s side was able to answer all the initial questions that the court asked in the
examination of their compliance to the preliminary injunction ordered by the court.
• They even showed proof to support their claims and statements.
• The petitioner’s side also proved that they had already ceased in using the marks ordered to
be prohibited of use by the court, particularly the mark “Big Mak.”
• The petitioner also presented proof and evidence that they actually followed the court’s
previous decision, even in the other aspects of their business.
• They also addressed the source of the evidence they used to prove their claims.
• As was said a while ago, there are no admissions as to such allegations at all.
• The date of capture of the pictures presented does not in itself prove that the action aligned
to the orders the court was just made on those dates.
• It was seen that the changes that the court ordered to be made in the business of the
petitioner, with regards to the infringement and unfair competition case, were put into
action.
• The Supreme Court did not agree to the sustained decision of CA in favor of the claim of
the respondent that the continuous use of the petitioners’ company name is in itself
trademark infringement and indirect contempt to the court’s decision.
• The Supreme Court also stated that the use of the petitioner’s company instead of the mark
“Big Mak” is actually in compliance with the previous court’s preliminary injunction.
• The sole focus of the petition is to discover whether or not the petitioner followed the
court's decision, regardless of how they did it.
• There are further details on the definition of contempt of court given to prove emphasis.
The Decision of the Court
• Based on the abovementioned details regarding this case, here is the official court decision
adhering to the matter.
• The contempt case is hereby dismissed by the Supreme Court, one with the decision of the
Contempt Court, in favor of the petitioner’s side.
• The instant petition made was granted.
• This assailed decision was dated February 17, 2017, resolution dated July 26, 2017.
• The decision made by the Court of Appeals was hereby reversed and set aside, while the
previous decision made by the Regional Trial Court of Makati City, Branch 59 with
regards to this case is hereby reinstated.
• This is the official decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines.
• Further details on the post case statements: