Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OG EE Philosophy - Annotated Bibliography
OG EE Philosophy - Annotated Bibliography
Diverges from theresearch to select relevant primary and secondary sources that can help you ans
Criteria Standard Approaches the Standard
to no attempt to use a some formatting inaccuracies or style
Citation
Summary/ correct/consistent citation format inconsistemcies
way they summarize or reflect on the the way they summarize or reflect on the
Annotation
Reliability of source. source.
credible/reliable and/or most discuss quality/reliability. Some explanations
Sources
Connection explanations are too brief or general. may be too brief or general.
topic, and/or most explanations are too can or cannot support the research topic.
to the RQ general. Some explanations may may be too general.
authorship, date and place of source, authorship, date and place of
Origin publication) publication)
There is an attempt to analyze the
Purpose source's purpose 3
There is an attempt to identify bias There
Clearisattempt
a clear attempt to identify
to analyze bias in
the source's
Content Bias in the source's content the source's content
values of the source with some of the source with consideratiom of the
Values consideratiom of the research question research question
limitations of the source with some limitations of the source with consideratiom
LImitations consideratiom of the research question of the research question
nt primary and secondary sources that can help you answer your research question. Please review the Annotated Bibliography Slide
Meets the Standard
standard citation format commonly used in the
discipline
The annotations effectively and succinctly
summarize and reflect on the source.
reasonable argument is made for its
quality/reliability.
Every source has a clear explanation of how it can
or cannot support the research topic.
pertaining to the source's origin (type of source,
authorship, date and place of publication)
4
Clear andand
Clear thorough analysis
throorough of theofbias
analysis the in
the source's content
values of the source with clear consideratiom of
the research question
4
Clear and thorough analysis of the
Primary Source #1 - Either/Or
Full Citation
Origin
Purpose
Content
Summary
Connection to
RQ
Values
Limitations
This story delves into both the absurd nature of the universe, as wlel as kierkegards conception of existentilism
and meaning.
Kierkegard is the father of existentialism, and this book is known to be one of his foudational documents on the
topic
Lacks commentary on marxism or socialism as kierkegard and marx never interacted, and kierkegard was more
focused on the individual
to showcase kierkegards idea of the final stage of human development, taking a leap of faith in religion
A retelling of a biblical story, focusing on existentialism and christianity / religion
Provides further insight into keirkegards existentialism, as well as the importance of religion / morals
A very firm link between religion and existentialism
Same as kierkegards other story
Secondary Source #2 -
Full Citation
Origin
Purpose
Content Summary
Connection to RQ
Values
Limitations
Secondary source #3 -
Full Citation
Origin
Purpose
Content Summary
Connection to RQ
Values
Limitations
Secondary Source #4
Full Citation
Origin
Purpose
Content Summary
Connection to RQ
Values
Limitations
Secondary source #1 - Socialism and humanism
"Albert Camus vs. Jean-Paul Sartre." The Living Philosophy, YouTube, 22 Jan. 2020,
Secondary Source #2 -
Secondary source #3 -
Secondary Source #4