Education plays a pivotal role in the development and progress of a country.

However, owing to
increased tuition fees, it is often debated who should cater to the higher education expenditures of
students whether parents or it's state responsibility.

First, university learning can cost a large amount of money, which can be an obstacle for those who are
financially inadequate. The tuition fee to participate in university courses could prevent the poor, who
are willing to learn, from getting a better education, and then deprive them of the chance to become
successful in the future. For example, in Vietnam, numerous youngsters were born without a good family
background and have no financial support from their parents. Notably, those poor students tend to show
excellent academic performance and the eager to learn more. Being aware of the situation, the
Vietnamese government has offered them a full scholarship to help them to finish their studying in
exchange for several years working for national institutions.
On the other hand, I believe that most students should have the responsibility to pay for their tertiary
education so that they could value studying more. In fact, if the public sector is in charge of paying
tuition fees for every student, some learners may not appreciate the education they get. To illustrate, in
elementary education, the Vietnamese government have paid for all children to go to the state schools.
However, some families seemed to underestimate the education their children might acquire. A similar
circumstance could happen to higher education if the parents do not have to worry about their
offspring’s learning.
In conclusion, the government’s financial support in higher education is a good attempt. Nevertheless,
the officials should assess the situation of each student to decide if they could receive the scholarship or
not.