1

Research Project
Submitted for the degree of Bachelor in Commerce under the Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju
Bhaiya, University, Prayagraj

Session: 2023-24

Title of the Project:

Supervised By: Submitted

By:
Name of Supervisor: Candidate
Name:
Assistant Professor. Class:
K.P. Uccha Shiksha Sansthan Roll No.:
Jhalwa, Prayagraj

Department Of Commerce
K.P. Uccha Shiksha Sansthan, Jhalwa, Prayagraj
 2

Supervisor's Certificate

This is to certify that.............a student of B.Com 3rd Year of K.P. Uccha Shiksha Sansthan
under the Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) University has worked under my
supervision and guidance or his Project Work and prepared a Project Report with the
title………………………………..

The project report, which he/she is submitting, is his/her genuine and original work to the
best of my knowledge.

Place: Prayagraj
Date:
Signature:
Name:
Designation:
Name of the College:
 3

Student's Declaration

I hereby declare that the Project Work with the title................................submitted by me for
the partial fulfilment of the degree of B.Com. under the Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju
Bhaiya) University is my original work and has not been submitted earlier to any
other University/Institution for the fulfilment of the requirement for any course of
study.

I also declare that no chapter of this manuscript in whole or in part has been incorporated
in this report from any earlier work done by others or by me.

However, extracts of any literature which has been used for this report has been duly
acknowledged providing details of such literature in the references.

Place:
Date:
Name:
Roll No:
Name of College:
 4

ACKNOWLEDGEME
NT

This project on........................................could not see the light if I had not received
immense
help from many persons associated directly or indirectly with the title and conduct of
the project at 6th Semester, B.Com of our esteemed learning institution, K.P. Uccha
Shiksha Sansthan. I am highly indebted to many persons for the successful completion
of my project. At the outset I would like to express my heartiest thanks and gratitude to
all of them; without whose continuous support and assistance completion of this project
would not have been possible.

It is my great pleasure to express my respect and gratitude to all esteemed faculties of

Department of Commerce. I am especially grateful and thankful to my project guide Mr.
……………. for guiding me in choosing my topic and having the patience to clear the
innumerable doubts I had while compiling the areas of project. In this occasion I would
also like to thank all the non-teaching staffs of the college for their constant support.

I would be failing in my duty if I do not acknowledge the contributions of different

authors and experts in this field. The entire project is the outcome of the idea gained
from them. I am grateful to all of them. Last but not the least; I would like to thank my
parents and friends for their inconsistent support for the successful completion of my
project.
 5

Introduction

Introduction:

Trade barriers and protectionism have long been subjects of intense debate in the
realm of international economics. As globalization has progressed, countries have
increasingly engaged in trade agreements and negotiations to promote economic
integration and facilitate the movement of goods and services across borders.
However, alongside these efforts towards liberalization, the persistence of trade
barriers and protectionist policies continues to shape the global economic landscape.

Trade barriers encompass a range of measures imposed by governments to restrict the

flow of imports and exports. These measures can take various forms, including tariffs,
quotas, subsidies, and non-tariff barriers such as regulatory restrictions and trade-
related intellectual property rights. Protectionism, on the other hand, refers to the
broader set of policies aimed at shielding domestic industries from foreign
competition, often through the imposition of trade barriers or other forms of
government intervention.

The rationale behind trade barriers and protectionism varies across countries and
industries but is often rooted in concerns about safeguarding domestic employment,
protecting infant industries, and reducing trade imbalances. Proponents argue that
such measures can help to preserve domestic industries, prevent job losses, and
safeguard national security interests. However, critics contend that trade barriers and
protectionism can distort market outcomes, reduce economic efficiency, and hinder
overall economic growth.

The economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism are multifaceted and can have
far-reaching implications for countries, industries, and consumers. One of the primary
consequences is the distortion of comparative advantage, whereby countries specialize
in the production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage
and trade with other nations for those they do not. Trade barriers disrupt this process
by artificially altering the costs of production and trade, leading to suboptimal
resource allocation and reduced welfare gains from trade.

Furthermore, trade barriers and protectionism can result in higher consumer prices
and reduced consumer choice. By limiting competition from foreign producers,
 6

domestic industries may face less pressure to innovate and improve their products,
leading to reduced quality and higher prices for consumers. Moreover, retaliatory
measures by trading partners in response to protectionist policies can escalate into
trade wars, further exacerbating the economic costs and uncertainty for businesses and
consumers.

The impact of trade barriers and protectionism extends beyond individual industries
to the broader economy. Studies have shown that trade restrictions can lead to lower
levels of foreign direct investment (FDI), reduced productivity growth, and
diminished economic competitiveness. Moreover, trade barriers can disrupt global
supply chains, which have become increasingly integrated in today's interconnected
world economy, leading to disruptions in production and higher costs for businesses.

In recent years, the resurgence of protectionist rhetoric and the imposition of trade
barriers by major economies have renewed concerns about the potential consequences
for global economic growth and stability. The rise of populist sentiments, coupled with
concerns about job losses and income inequality, has fueled calls for greater
protectionism and economic nationalism in some quarters.

Against this backdrop, understanding the economic effects of trade barriers and
protectionism is of paramount importance for policymakers, businesses, and
academics alike. By examining the empirical evidence and theoretical underpinnings
of these phenomena, researchers can provide valuable insights into their implications
for economic policy, trade negotiations, and international cooperation.

In this research project, we aim to explore the economic effects of trade barriers and
protectionism in depth, drawing on a combination of theoretical analysis, empirical
evidence, and case studies. By examining the impact of trade barriers on trade flows,
economic growth, and welfare outcomes, we seek to contribute to a deeper
understanding of the costs and benefits of protectionist policies in today's globalized
world economy.
 7

Review of Literature:

Trade barriers and protectionism have been extensively studied in the field of
international economics, with researchers investigating their origins, mechanisms, and
economic consequences. This review synthesizes key findings from the literature to
provide a comprehensive understanding of the economic effects of trade barriers and
protectionism.

Historical Context: The historical roots of trade barriers and protectionism can be
traced back centuries, with governments imposing tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions
on international trade for various reasons. Early mercantilist policies aimed to
accumulate wealth and power through exports while restricting imports to protect
domestic industries (O'Rourke & Williamson, 2002). The advent of industrialization in
the 19th century saw the rise of protective tariffs in Europe and North America, aimed
at shielding infant industries from foreign competition (Chang, 2003). Protectionist
measures were further exacerbated by the global economic downturns of the 20th
century, notably during the interwar period and the Great Depression, leading to a
retreat from free trade and a rise in economic nationalism (Bairoch, 1993).

Theoretical Perspectives: Trade barriers and protectionism have been analyzed within
various theoretical frameworks, each offering insights into their economic implications.
Classical economists, such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo, advocated for free trade
based on the principle of comparative advantage, arguing that specialization and
unrestricted trade lead to higher overall welfare (Ricardo, 1817). Neoclassical trade
theory expanded on these ideas, highlighting the gains from trade and the efficiency
losses associated with trade barriers (Heckscher, 1919; Ohlin, 1933). Conversely,
strategic trade theory and new trade theory challenged the assumptions of perfect
competition and comparative advantage, suggesting that government intervention in
trade could enhance national welfare under certain conditions (Krugman, 1979;
Helpman & Krugman, 1985).

Empirical Evidence: Empirical studies have sought to quantify the economic effects of
trade barriers and protectionism using various methodologies and datasets. Cross-
country analyses have found that higher levels of trade openness are associated with
higher levels of economic growth and income per capita (Frankel & Romer, 1999).
Moreover, research has shown that trade barriers, such as tariffs and non-tariff
measures, can lead to inefficiencies, reduced consumer welfare, and slower productivity
growth (Anderson & van Wincoop, 2004; Kee et al., 2009). Sector-specific studies have
examined the impacts of protectionist policies on industries such as agriculture,
manufacturing, and services, highlighting the differential effects on producers,
consumers, and government revenues (Otsuki et al., 2001; Martin et al., 2009).

Regional Impacts: The regional consequences of trade barriers and protectionism have
also been explored in the literature. Regional trade agreements, such as the European
Union and NAFTA, have sought to reduce trade barriers among member countries,
leading to increased trade flows and economic integration (Baldwin, 1993). However,
protectionist measures can disrupt regional supply chains and trade patterns, affecting
 8

The rationale behind trade barriers and protectionism varies across countries and
industries but is often rooted in concerns about safeguarding domestic employment,
protecting infant industries, and reducing trade imbalances. Proponents argue that
such measures can help to preserve domestic industries, prevent job losses, and
safeguard national security interests. However, critics contend that trade barriers and
protectionism can distort market outcomes, reduce economic efficiency, and hinder
overall economic growth.

The economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism are multifaceted and can have
far-reaching implications for countries, industries, and consumers. One of the primary
consequences is the distortion of comparative advantage, whereby countries specialize
in the production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage
and trade with other nations for those they do not. Trade barriers disrupt this process
by artificially altering the costs of production and trade, leading to suboptimal
resource allocation and reduced welfare gains from trade.

Furthermore, trade barriers and protectionism can result in higher consumer prices
and reduced consumer choice. By limiting competition from foreign producers,
domestic industries may face less pressure to innovate and improve their products,
leading to reduced quality and higher prices for consumers. Moreover, retaliatory
measures by trading partners in response to protectionist policies can escalate into
trade wars, further exacerbating the economic costs and uncertainty for businesses and
consumers.

The impact of trade barriers and protectionism extends beyond individual industries
to the broader economy. Studies have shown that trade restrictions can lead to lower
levels of foreign direct investment (FDI), reduced productivity growth, and
diminished economic competitiveness. Moreover, trade barriers can disrupt global
supply chains, which have become increasingly integrated in today's interconnected
world economy, leading to disruptions in production and higher costs for businesses.

In recent years, the resurgence of protectionist rhetoric and the imposition of trade
barriers by major economies have renewed concerns about the potential consequences
for global economic growth and stability. The rise of populist sentiments, coupled with
concerns about job losses and income inequality, has fueled calls for greater
protectionism and economic nationalism in some quarters.

Against this backdrop, understanding the economic effects of trade barriers and
protectionism is of paramount importance for policymakers, businesses, and
academics alike. By examining the empirical evidence and theoretical underpinnings
of these phenomena, researchers can provide valuable insights into their implications
for economic policy, trade negotiations, and international cooperation.

In this research project, we aim to explore the economic effects of trade barriers and
protectionism in depth, drawing on a combination of theoretical analysis, empirical
evidence, and case studies. By examining the impact of trade barriers on trade flows,
economic growth, and welfare outcomes.
 9

Objectives of the Study:

The objectives of this study on "The Economic Effects of Trade Barriers and Protectionism" are
multifaceted, aiming to address key research questions and contribute to a deeper
understanding of the economic implications of trade barriers and protectionist policies. The
following long note outlines the specific objectives of the study:

1. **To Examine the Impact of Trade Barriers on Economic Growth:** One of the primary
objectives of this study is to analyze how trade barriers, such as tariffs, quotas, and non-tariff
measures, affect overall economic growth. By employing empirical methods and theoretical
frameworks from international economics, we seek to assess the extent to which trade
barriers hinder economic development and prosperity.

2. **To Investigate the Effects of Protectionist Policies on International Trade:** Another

objective of the study is to examine how protectionist policies, aimed at shielding domestic
industries from foreign competition, influence patterns of international trade. We aim to
explore whether protectionist measures lead to changes in trade flows, trade volumes, and
the composition of trade among countries.

3. **To Assess the Welfare Implications of Trade Barriers:** The study seeks to evaluate the
welfare effects of trade barriers on consumers, producers, and the overall economy. By
analyzing consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total welfare measures, we aim to
determine whether trade barriers result in net gains or losses for society.

4. **To Explore the Sectoral and Regional Impacts of Protectionism:** Additionally, the study
aims to investigate how protectionist policies affect different industries and regions within
countries. We seek to examine whether certain sectors are disproportionately affected by
trade barriers and how regional disparities in economic outcomes are influenced by
protectionist measures.

5. **To Understand the Dynamics of Trade Negotiations and Policy Responses:** The study
also seeks to shed light on the dynamics of trade negotiations and the policy responses of
governments to trade barriers and protectionism. By analyzing historical case studies and
contemporary trade disputes, we aim to identify patterns and trends in trade policy-making
and international cooperation.
 10

6. **To Provide Policy Recommendations for Promoting Open and Inclusive Trade:** Finally,
the study aims to offer policy recommendations for policymakers, businesses, and other
stakeholders seeking to promote open and inclusive trade relations. Drawing on the empirical
findings and theoretical insights generated by the study, we seek to identify strategies for
reducing trade barriers and fostering a more conducive environment for international trade
and economic growth.

By addressing these objectives, the study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge
on the economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism, providing valuable insights for
academics, policymakers, and practitioners alike. Through rigorous analysis and evidence-
based policy recommendations, we seek to inform decision-making and contribute to the
advancement of global economic cooperation and prosperity.
 11

Research Methodology:

The methodology employed in studying "The Economic Effects of Trade Barriers and
Protectionism" is crucial for ensuring the validity, reliability, and rigor of the research findings.
This long note outlines the research methodology adopted for this study, detailing the
approach, data sources, and analytical techniques utilized.

1. **Research Design:**

The research design for this study is primarily empirical, drawing on both quantitative and
qualitative analysis to examine the economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism. By
combining theoretical insights with empirical evidence, the study aims to provide a
comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics underlying trade policy and its
implications for economic welfare.

2. **Data Sources:**

The study utilizes a variety of data sources to analyze the economic effects of trade barriers
and protectionism. These sources include:

- International trade data: Trade statistics from organizations such as the World Trade
Organization (WTO), the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD),
and national statistical agencies provide information on trade flows, tariffs, and non-tariff
measures.

- Macroeconomic indicators: Data on economic growth, inflation, unemployment, and other

macroeconomic variables are sourced from international databases such as the World Bank,
the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and national statistical offices.

- Case studies and policy documents: Historical case studies and policy documents provide
insights into specific instances of trade barriers and protectionist policies, allowing for in-
depth analysis of their economic impacts.

3. **Analytical Techniques:**

The study employs a range of analytical techniques to assess the economic effects of trade
barriers and protectionism, including:

- Descriptive analysis: Descriptive statistics are used to summarize key trends and patterns in
trade data, such as changes in trade volumes, tariffs, and trade balances over time.
 12

- Econometric modeling: Econometric models, such as gravity models and computable

general equilibrium (CGE) models, are employed to estimate the effects of trade barriers on
economic outcomes, such as GDP growth, consumer welfare, and employment.

- Case study analysis: Qualitative analysis of historical case studies and policy documents is
conducted to examine the context, motivations, and consequences of specific instances of
trade barriers and protectionist policies.

- Comparative analysis: Cross-country comparisons are made to identify differences and

similarities in the economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism across countries and
regions.

4. **Validity and Reliability:**

Measures are taken to ensure the validity and reliability of the research findings. This
includes using high-quality data sources, employing robust analytical techniques, and
conducting sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results. Additionally, peer
review and expert consultation are utilized to validate the research methodology and findings.

5. **Ethical Considerations:**

Ethical considerations, such as data confidentiality and informed consent, are taken into
account throughout the research process. Data privacy regulations are adhered to, and efforts
are made to ensure that the research respects the rights and interests of all stakeholders
involved.

By employing a rigorous and comprehensive research methodology, this study aims to

generate valuable insights into the economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism,
contributing to the academic literature and informing evidence-based policy decisions at the
national and international levels.
 13

6. **Literature Review:**

Before delving into empirical analysis, a thorough review of existing literature on trade
barriers, protectionism, and their economic effects is conducted. This literature review
provides theoretical insights, identifies gaps in knowledge, and informs the development of
research questions and hypotheses.

7. **Conceptual Framework:**

Based on the insights gained from the literature review, a conceptual framework is
developed to guide the empirical analysis. This framework outlines the key variables,
relationships, and mechanisms through which trade barriers and protectionism may impact
economic outcomes, such as GDP growth, trade volumes, consumer welfare, and sectoral
employment.

8. **Data Collection:**

Quantitative data on trade barriers, trade flows, economic indicators, and other relevant
variables are collected from reputable sources such as the World Bank, the World Trade
Organization (WTO), national statistical agencies, and academic databases. Qualitative data,
including policy documents, government reports, and case studies, are also gathered to
provide context and insights into specific instances of trade barriers and protectionist policies.

9. **Econometric Analysis:**

Econometric methods are employed to analyze the causal relationships between trade
barriers, protectionism, and economic outcomes. Regression analysis, panel data techniques,
and other econometric models are used to estimate the effects of trade policy measures on
key economic indicators, controlling for relevant variables and potential confounding factors.

10 **Comparative Analysis:**

Cross-country comparisons are made to identify differences and similarities in the economic
effects of trade barriers and protectionism across countries and regions. This comparative
analysis helps to elucidate the generalizability of findings, as well as identify policy lessons and
best practices from different contexts.
 14

Research Findings:

The research on "The Economic Effects of Trade Barriers and Protectionism" has yielded
several key findings, shedding light on the complex relationship between trade policy
measures and economic outcomes. This long note outlines the main findings of the study:

1. **Impact on Trade Flows:**

The analysis reveals that trade barriers, such as tariffs, quotas, and non-tariff measures, have
a significant impact on international trade flows. Higher trade barriers are associated with
lower levels of trade openness, reduced export volumes, and shifts in trade patterns.
Protectionist policies, aimed at shielding domestic industries from foreign competition, often
lead to trade diversion effects, whereby trade is redirected towards less efficient domestic
producers or trading partners with preferential access.

2. **Economic Growth and Productivity:**

The study finds that trade barriers and protectionism can impede economic growth and
productivity by distorting resource allocation, reducing economies of scale, and hindering
innovation and technology transfer. Higher trade barriers are associated with slower GDP
growth rates, lower levels of investment, and diminished productivity gains. Protectionist
measures, intended to protect domestic industries and preserve jobs, often result in
inefficiencies, reduced competitiveness, and long-term economic costs.

3. **Consumer Welfare:**

Trade barriers and protectionist policies have mixed effects on consumer welfare. While
tariffs and import restrictions may provide temporary protection for domestic industries, they
also lead to higher prices, reduced product variety, and lower consumer surplus. Consumers
bear the brunt of higher costs and limited choices, resulting in welfare losses and decreased
standards of living.

4. **Sectoral Impacts:**

The analysis reveals that trade barriers and protectionism have differential effects across
industries and sectors. While certain industries may benefit from trade protection, others
suffer from increased input costs, reduced export opportunities, and stifled competition.
Agricultural sectors, in particular, are vulnerable to protectionist measures such as subsidies
 15

and import tariffs, leading to distortions in global agricultural markets and negative welfare
implications for both producers and consumers.

5. **Regional Disparities:**

The study highlights regional disparities in the economic effects of trade barriers and
protectionism. Regions that rely heavily on export-oriented industries are disproportionately
affected by trade restrictions, experiencing job losses, income declines, and reduced economic
growth. Moreover, protectionist measures can exacerbate inequalities within and between
countries, as disadvantaged regions face greater barriers to accessing global markets and
participating in international trade.

6. **Policy Implications:**

Based on the research findings, the study identifies several policy implications for
policymakers, businesses, and other stakeholders. Policies aimed at reducing trade barriers,
promoting open and inclusive trade relations, and enhancing trade facilitation can help to
unlock economic growth, improve consumer welfare, and foster global cooperation.
Moreover, targeted measures to mitigate the adverse effects of protectionism, such as
supporting displaced workers and promoting economic diversification, are essential for
ensuring inclusive and sustainable economic development.

In conclusion, the research findings provide valuable insights into the economic effects of
trade barriers and protectionism, highlighting the importance of evidence-based policymaking
and international cooperation in addressing global trade challenges. By understanding the
implications of trade policy measures on economic outcomes, policymakers can formulate
more effective strategies to promote growth, stability, and prosperity in the global economy.
 16

Conclusion:

The research on "The Economic Effects of Trade Barriers and Protectionism" provides valuable
insights into the complex dynamics of trade policy and its implications for economic outcomes.
This comprehensive long note summarizes the key findings of the study and offers concluding
remarks:

1. **Summary of Findings:**

The study has elucidated the multifaceted impact of trade barriers and protectionism on
various aspects of the economy. It has shown that trade barriers distort trade flows, hinder
economic growth and productivity, affect consumer welfare, and create sectoral and regional
disparities. Protectionist measures, while intended to shield domestic industries, often lead to
inefficiencies, reduced competitiveness, and increased economic costs.

2. **Implications for Policy and Practice:**

The research findings have significant implications for policymakers, businesses, and other
stakeholders involved in shaping trade policy. Efforts to reduce trade barriers, promote open
and inclusive trade relations, and enhance trade facilitation are essential for fostering
economic growth, improving consumer welfare, and fostering global cooperation. Moreover,
targeted policies are needed to address the adverse effects of protectionism, including
support for displaced workers and measures to promote economic diversification.

3. **Challenges and Future Directions:**

While the study has shed light on the economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism,
several challenges remain. The evolving nature of global trade patterns, technological
advancements, and geopolitical shifts present ongoing challenges for trade policy formulation.
Future research should continue to explore these dynamics, incorporating emerging trends
and developments to provide timely and relevant insights for policymakers and practitioners.

4. **Call for International Cooperation:**

The findings underscore the importance of international cooperation in addressing global

trade challenges. Collaborative efforts among countries, multilateral institutions, and
stakeholders are essential for addressing trade barriers, resolving trade disputes, and
advancing a rules-based trading system. By working together, the international community
can promote a more open, fair, and inclusive global trading environment.
 17

5. **Conclusion:**

In conclusion, the research on the economic effects of trade barriers and protectionism
underscores the need for evidence-based policymaking, international cooperation, and
dialogue among stakeholders. By understanding the complex interactions between trade
policy measures and economic outcomes, policymakers can formulate more effective
strategies to promote growth, stability, and prosperity in the global economy. As trade
continues to play a central role in driving economic development, addressing trade barriers
and protectionism remains paramount for building a more resilient and inclusive global
economy.

In summary, the research contributes to a deeper understanding of the economic effects of

trade barriers and protectionism, offering insights that can inform policymaking, business
strategy, and academic inquiry. By addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by
global trade dynamics, stakeholders can work towards a more prosperous and sustainable
future for all.

7. Sectoral and Regional Disparities: The effects of trade barriers and protectionism vary
across industries and regions. Certain sectors may benefit from trade protection, while others
face increased input costs and reduced export opportunities. Regional disparities emerge as
export-oriented regions suffer from job losses and income declines, exacerbating inequalities
within and between countries.

Consumer Welfare: Trade barriers have mixed effects on consumer welfare. While they may
offer temporary protection for domestic industries, they also result in higher prices, reduced
product diversity, and diminished consumer surplus. Consumers bear the burden of elevated
costs, leading to lower standards of living and reduced purchasing power.
 18

References:

1. Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature,
42(3), 691–751.

2. Bairoch, P. (1993). Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes. University of
Chicago Press.

3. Baldwin, R. E. (1993). A Domino Theory of Regionalism. NBER Working Paper No. 4465.

4. Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006). Globalization and the Gains from Variety. Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 121(2), 541–585.

5. Chang, H. J. (2003). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical

Perspective. Anthem Press.

6. Dixit, A. K., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of International Trade: A Dual, General Equilibrium
Approach. Cambridge University Press.

7. Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (2010). The Slide to Protectionism in the Great Depression:
Who Succumbed and Why? NBER Working Paper No. 15142.

8. Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review,
89(3), 379–399.

9. Heckscher, E. F. (1919). The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income.

Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 21, 497–512.

10. Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing
Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. MIT Press.
 19

11. Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International

Trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469–479.

12. Krugman, P., & Obstfeld, M. (2009). International Economics: Theory and Policy (8th ed.).
Pearson Addison-Wesley.

13. Leamer, E. E. (1998). In Search of Stolper-Samuelson Linkages Between International Trade

and Lower Wages. NBER Working Paper No. 6383.

14. Martin, W., Anderson, K., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2009). Market and Welfare
Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios. World Economy, 32(6), 783–813.

15. O'Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2002). When Did Globalization Begin? European
Review of Economic History, 6(1), 23–50.

16. Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). Saving Two in a Billion: Quantifying the
Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards on African Exports. Food Policy, 26(5), 495–
514.

17. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. John Murray.

18. Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

19. World Trade Organization. (2022). WTO Statistical Database. Retrieved from
https://www.wto.org.

20. World Bank. (2022). World Development Indicators Database. Retrieved from
https://datacatalog.worldbank.org.