Scaffold 2: Peer Evaluation Form for Scrapbook

Group Number _________ Section: __________________ Name of Group Leader _____________________________________ *Note: Group leader may choose a group member to rate him/her.
Write the names of your members in the numbered boxes. Then, assign yourself a value in the listed attribute. Finally, do the same for each of your members and total all the values.
Excellent (6) Very Good (5) Good (4) Fair (3) Poor (2)

Criteria Responsiven Contribution Cooperation Quality of work Dependability TOTAL

ess

LEADER

MEMBER 1

MEMBER 2

MEMBER 3

MEMBER 4

MEMBER 5

MEMBER 6

MEMBER 7

MEMBER 8

MEMBER 9

MEMBER 10

MEMBER 11

MEMBER 12

MEMBER 13
Responsiveness: Highly Competent (6 points): Responds promptly to all communications and requests, often exceeding expectations. Competent (4-5 points): Generally responsive, but may occasionally miss
communications or respond with slight delays. Moderate (2-3 points): Sometimes responds to communications and requests, but may frequently miss or delay responses. Limited (1 point): Rarely responds to
communications or requests, often causing delays or disruptions. Incompetent (0 points): Does not respond to any communications or requests within the group.

Contribution: Highly Competent (6 points): Actively participates in group discussions, offers valuable insights, and consistently completes assigned tasks with excellence. Competent (4-5 points): Generally
contributes to group discussions and tasks, but may occasionally require prompting or encouragement. Moderate (2-3 points): Participates inconsistently, occasionally contributing ideas or completing tasks but
often requiring significant reminders or follow-up. Limited (1 point): Rarely contributes to group discussions or tasks, frequently requiring extensive follow-up or failing to complete assigned tasks adequately.
Incompetent (0 points): Does not contribute anything to the group's goals or tasks.

Cooperation: Highly Competent (6 points): Demonstrates exceptional teamwork skills, actively supports and collaborates with others, and resolves conflicts effectively. Competent (4-5 points): Generally works
well with others, contributes to a positive team dynamic, and handles conflicts constructively. Moderate (2-3 points): Occasionally struggles to work with others, may exhibit some uncooperative behavior or
difficulty resolving conflicts. Limited (1 point): Demonstrates poor teamwork skills, often causing friction within the group or refusing to collaborate effectively. Incompetent (0 points): Is unable or unwilling to
work with others, causing significant disruptions to the group's dynamics.

Quality of Work: Highly Competent (6 points): Consistently produces work of exceptional quality, meeting or exceeding the group's standards with every task. Competent (4-5 points): Generally produces high-
quality work that meets the group's standards, with occasional minor errors or areas for improvement. Moderate (2-3 points): Produces work of inconsistent quality, sometimes meeting the group's standards
but often requiring revisions or improvements. Limited (1 point): Produces work of poor quality that frequently fails to meet the group's standards, requiring extensive revisions or corrections. Incompetent (0
points): Does not produce any work of acceptable quality, consistently failing to meet the group's standards.

Dependability: Highly Competent (6 points): Consistently fulfills responsibilities, meets all deadlines, and can be relied upon to deliver high-quality work consistently. Competent (4-5 points): Generally
dependable, meeting most deadlines and fulfilling responsibilities adequately, with occasional minor delays or issues. Moderate (2-3 points): Sometimes unreliable, frequently missing deadlines or failing to
fulfill responsibilities without adequate explanation or communication. Limited (1 point): Often fails to meet deadlines or fulfill responsibilities, causing significant disruptions to the group's progress or
workflow. Incompetent (0 points): Completely unreliable, never meeting deadlines or fulfilling responsibilities, and consistently hindering the group's progress. These competency levels provide a structured
framework for assessing peers' performance based on the specified criteria.