SCHOOL OF LAW, NARSEE MONJEE INSTITUTE

OFMANAGEMENT STUDIES, BENGALURU

INTERNSHIP REPORT AND INTERNSHIP CERTIFICATE

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE MARKING SCHEME,

FOR THE YEARVOF 2023-2024, WITH RESPECT TO INTERNSHIP ASSESSMENT

SUBMITTED TO: - SUBMITTED BY: -

Prof. Viplav Baranwal Name-B. Parichaya Reddy

Date- Vth year.

Time - Honours in Business Law

BBA, LL. B (Hons.)

SAP ID- 81021219018

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY OF WORK

I hereby attest that the contents of this internship report embody the culmination of my
individual efforts and original contributions during the period of my internship, conducted under
the guidance and supervision of Mr. M. Venkatesh from 1stMay 2023 to 30th June 2023.

The execution of this work strictly adheres to established academic protocols and guidelines,
demonstrating a steadfast commitment to ethical practices throughout the research process.

It is imperative to emphasize that this report, in its entirety, has not been and will not be
submitted for consideration by any other student or to any alternative educational institution,
either partially or in full. This declaration underscores my dedication to upholding the principles
of academic integrity and ensuring the unique and exclusive nature of the work herein presented.

Signature by:
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The successful completion of this internship stands as a testament to the generous opportunity
provided by chairperson of school of law, NMIMS Bengaluru Mrs. Tanmeet Sahiwal. I consider
myself exceptionally fortunate to have been under her mentorship, not only acquiring
knowledge, for which I am deeply thankful, but also gaining practical exposure that has
significantly enriched my overall understanding.

I extend my heartfelt gratitude to School of Law, NMIMS Bengaluru for allowing me to explore
the intricacies of the legal field and dedicating time to facilitate practical learning. Their
unwavering support and guidance have played an instrumental role in making this transformative
experience possible.

I would also like to express my sincere appreciation to my professors who have contributed to
my learning and growth during this internship. Their insights and support have been invaluable,
enhancing the depth of my professional development.

Furthermore, my deepest thanks go to my parents, whose constant support has been the bedrock
of my endeavors. Their encouragement has been an unending source of strength, propelling me
forward in my pursuit of becoming a successful lawyer. Their pivotal role in my journey goes
beyond what words can adequately express.

This internship serves as a significant milestone in my career aspirations. I am committed to not

only utilizing the acquired skills and knowledge to the best of my ability but also to continuous
improvement. I look forward to leveraging these experiences as I strive to achieve my desired
career objectives, with immense gratitude for the collective support that has shaped my
professional trajectory.
 SUMMARY

During my internship, I had the privilege of working under the mentorship of Senior Advocate
D. Bharath Kumar, an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India, Delhi.
Spanning from December 1st, 2021, to December 31st, 2021, the internship provided me with
invaluable exposure to the intricacies of legal practice and procedures at both the Supreme Court
of India and the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, New Delhi.

Throughout my tenure, I actively engaged in a diverse array of tasks, ranging from drafting legal
documents such as Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), Statutory Petitions, Transfer Petitions, and
various court pleadings like counters and rejoinders. Additionally, I delved into comprehensive
research on legal precedents and laws, particularly focusing on areas such as the Consumer
Protection Act of 2019, Civil Law, Criminal Law, and Family Law.

I attended both virtual and physical court proceedings at the Supreme Court of India and the
National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission respectively was a pivotal aspect of my
internship. These experiences offered me firsthand insights into courtroom dynamics, judicial
proceedings, and the interaction between judges and advocates.

Under the guidance of Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, I actively contributed to office tasks,
including case preparation, client management, and handling various matters across Real Estate
Law, Criminal Law, Property Cases, and Consumer Disputes.

The internship left an indelible impression by highlighting the importance of continuous learning
and staying updated on contemporary legal issues. Witnessing the responses of Supreme Court
judges and the advocacy process during court proceedings underscored the significance of
honing skills for success in the legal profession.
 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

 CPA: Consumer Protection Act

 NCDRC: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
 SCDRC: State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
 DCDRF: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
 OP: Opposite Party (in a consumer complaint)
 OCP: Original Consumer Petition
 CPC: Code of Civil Procedure
 SLP: Special Leave Petition
 IA: Interlocutory Application
 ADJ: Additional District Judge
 CrPC: Code of Criminal Procedure
 IPC: Indian Penal Code
 FIR: First Information Report
 AOR: Advocate-on-Record
 Ld. Sessions J.: Learned Sessions Judge
 Accd: Accused
 V/s: Versus
 LIST OF LAWS

Serial No. Section No. Legislation

01 Article 136 Special Leave Petition (Indian Constitution)
02 Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(dishonor of
cheque for insufficiency of funds)
03 Section 13 Civil Law (Suits for Immovable Property )
04 Section 10 Indian Divorce Act, 1869(Matrimonial
jurisdictions)
05 Section 36 Consumer Protection Act, 2019(Appeal to the
National Commission)
06 Sections 88-100 Consumer Protection Act, 2019(insurance claims)
07 Section 2(7): Consumer Protection Act, 2019("defect" in
goods.)
08 Section 2(10) Consumer Protection Act, 2019(Unfair Trade
Practice)
 DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERNSHIP FIRM

The firm, led by Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, operates at the apex of legal practice with a
focus on delivering excellence in legal representation and consultancy services.It is Situated in
the heart of Delhi, the firm specializes in handling complex legal matters primarily concerning
Real Estate Law, Criminal Law, Property Cases, and Consumer Disputes.

With an extensive network and deep-rooted expertise, the firm caters to a diverse clientele,
offering tailored solutions to meet their legal needs. Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, an
accomplished Advocate-on-Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India, spearheads the firm's
operations, bringing years of experience and a track record of success.

The firm prides itself on its commitment to providing comprehensive legal assistance, from
drafting specialized legal documents such as Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), Statutory Petitions,
Transfer Petitions, to conducting meticulous research on legal precedents and laws.

Interns at the firm receive hands-on training and exposure to various facets of legal practice,
including attending court proceedings both virtually and physically. This immersive experience
fosters a deep understanding of courtroom dynamics, judicial procedures, and the art of effective
advocacy.

Under the mentorship of Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, interns actively contribute to office
tasks, gaining practical insights into case preparation, client management, and handling a diverse
range of legal matters. The firm's ethos revolves around continuous learning and staying abreast
of contemporary legal developments, ensuring that interns are equipped with the skills and
knowledge necessary for success in the legal profession.
 AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERNSHIP WORK

Week 1:

December 1st, 2021, to December 7th, 2021

 Worked under Article 136 - Special Leave Petition (SLP) (Indian Constitution):
 Researched and studied the provisions and procedures related to filing Special Leave
Petitions in the Supreme Court of India.
 Reviewed landmark judgments and analyzed their implications on the legal landscape.
 Prepared case briefs on notable SLP cases and presented personal opinions on their
significance.
 Attended virtual Supreme Court hearings to observe courtroom proceedings and analyze
arguments presented by counsels.
 Engaged in various administrative tasks such as: Observing and assisting in the Appeal
Section, OP Section, Filing, Diary, and Dispatch Section.
 Assisted and worked in the office on different nature of matters including case
preparation, client's management and client handling etc...

Week 2:

December 8th, 2021, to December 14th, 2021

 Worked under Section 138 - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Dishonor of

cheque for insufficiency of funds):
 Studied the legal provisions pertaining to dishonor of cheques due to insufficient
funds or stop payment.
 Analyzed relevant case laws to understand the application of Section 138 in
various scenarios.
 Prepared case briefs on significant cases related to dishonored cheques and
presented arguments for mock courtroom proceedings.
  Attended virtual Supreme Court hearings to gain insights into how issues related
to dishonored cheques are adjudicated at the highest level.
 Assisting in the Revision Petition section and Original Petition section.
 Attended virtual Supreme Court hearings and continued to observe and analyze
legal proceedings.

Week 3:

December 15th, 2021, to December 21st, 2021

 Worked under Civil Law (Suits for Immovable Property)

 Explored the legal framework governing suits related to immovable property
under civil law.
 Researched the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, focusing on matrimonial jurisdictions.
 Studied provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, related to appeals to the
National Commission.
 Participated in drafting case briefs, analyzing court proceedings, and formulating
arguments for mock courtroom sessions.
 Attended hearings at the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
(NCDRC) to observe consumer dispute resolution procedures and gain practical
insights.

Week 4:

December 22nd, 2021, to December 31st, 2021

 Worked under Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 Explored Sections 88-100 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, pertaining to
insurance claims.
 Studied definitions of terms such as "defect" in goods (Section 2(7)) and "unfair
trade practice" (Section 2(10).
 Participated in writing case briefs, analyzing insurance claim cases, and
presenting arguments for mock courtroom proceedings.
  Attended additional hearings at the NCDRC to gain further exposure to consumer
dispute resolution mechanisms and procedures.

Learning and Sharing of Experiences from the Internship:

During my internship at the law firm led by Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, from December
1st, 2021, to December 31st, 2021, I was immersed in a rich learning experience that broadened
my understanding of legal practice and procedures. Working under the mentorship of Senior
Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India, I
gained valuable insights into various facets of legal practice.

Learning Experiences:

1. Drafting Legal Documents: I actively participated in drafting legal documents such as

Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), Statutory Petitions, Transfer Petitions, and various court
pleadings like counters and rejoinders. This allowed me to grasp the intricacies of legal
drafting and sharpen my writing skills.
2. Comprehensive Legal Research: I conducted comprehensive research on legal
precedents and laws, with a particular focus on areas such as the Consumer Protection
Act of 2019, Civil Law, Criminal Law, and Family Law. This research deepened my
understanding of legal principles and their application in various contexts.
3. Courtroom Observations: Attending both virtual and physical court proceedings at the
Supreme Court of India and the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission
(NCDRC) provided me with firsthand insights into courtroom dynamics, judicial
proceedings, and the interaction between judges and advocates. These observations
enhanced my understanding of advocacy and litigation strategies.
4. Administrative Tasks: I actively contributed to office tasks, including case preparation,
client management, and handling various matters across Real Estate Law, Criminal Law,
Property Cases, and Consumer Disputes. This hands-on experience instilled in me a sense
of responsibility and professionalism in handling legal matters.
 SIGNIFICANT CASE STUDIES

 Article 136 - Special Leave Petition (Indian Constitution)

Case: Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India,
( 2016)
Citation: (2016) 5 SCC 1,

Facts: The case dealt with the issue of the primacy of the Chief Justice of India in
constituting benches and allocation of cases in the Supreme Court. The petitioners
challenged the memorandum of procedure for appointments and transfers of
judges.

Issue: Whether the Chief Justice of India's authority to allocate cases and
constitute benches is subject to the collegium system or the discretion of the Chief
Justice alone.

Judgment: The Supreme Court affirmed the primacy of the Chief Justice in
constituting benches and allocating cases, subject to the established principles of
law and fairness.

This case pertains to Article 136 - Special Leave Petition (SLP) of the Indian Constitution, emphasizing the authority of

the Chief Justice of India in allocating cases and constituting benches in the Supreme Court. During this week, you

familiarized yourself with SLP procedures, reviewed relevant judgments, and observed courtroom proceedings, which
provided foundational knowledge for understanding the legal landscape.

 Section 138 - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Dishonor of cheque for insufficiency of
funds)

Case: K. Bhaskaran vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan, (1999)

Citation: (1999) 7 SCC 510

Facts: The case involved the dishonor of a cheque issued by the accused due to
insufficient funds. The complainant filed a case under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
 Issue: Whether the accused can be held liable under Section 138 even if the
cheque was issued towards a pre-existing debt.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that Section 138 is a strict liability offense,
and the existence of a debt is not a valid defense. The accused was held liable for
the dishonored cheque.

This case involves Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, addressing the dishonor of cheques due to

insufficient funds. During this week, you studied the legal provisions related to dishonored cheques, analyzed relevant

case laws, and prepared case briefs, enhancing your understanding of the application of Section 138 in various

scenarios.

 Section 10 - Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (Matrimonial jurisdictions),( 1985)

Case: Jordan Diengdeh v. S.S. Chopra
Citation: AIR 1985 SC 935

Facts: The case involved a dispute over jurisdiction under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869.
The petitioner sought a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty by the respondent.

Issue: Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain a petition for divorce under
the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, when the petitioner was not domiciled in India.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the High Court did not have jurisdiction to
entertain the petition as the petitioner was not domiciled in India. The petitioner was
directed to seek relief in the appropriate jurisdiction.

This case revolves around Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, concerning matrimonial jurisdictions. During this week, you

explored civil law related to suits for immovable property, including jurisdictional issues under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869.

Additionally, you studied provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, regarding appeals to the National Commission, which

broadened your understanding of civil and consumer laws.

 Section 36 - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (Appeal to the National Commission)

Case: Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta,( 1994)

Citation: (1994) 1 SCC 243

Facts: The case involved a dispute between the Lucknow Development Authority and a
plot allottee regarding the cancellation of allotment and refund of the amount paid.

Issue: Whether the allottee could approach the National Commission under the
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the cancellation of allotment by the authority.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the allottee was a consumer under the
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and could file a complaint before the appropriate
consumer forum, including the National Commission.

This case involves Section 36 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, concerning appeals to the National Commission. During this

week, you delved into Sections 88-100 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, focusing on insurance claims, and studied definitions

such as "defect" in goods and "unfair trade practice." By analyzing insurance claim cases and participating in mock courtroom

proceedings, you applied your knowledge of consumer protection laws in practical scenarios.

 Sections 88-100 - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (Insurance claims):

Case: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Narain Dhut, (2007)
Citation: (2007) 3 SCC 700

Facts: The case involved a dispute over the repudiation of an insurance claim by the
insurer on the grounds of non-disclosure of material facts.

Issue: Whether the insurer was justified in repudiating the insurance claim due to non-
disclosure of material facts by the insured.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the repudiation of the insurance claim was
justified as the insured failed to disclose material facts relevant to the risk covered under
the policy.

uring your internship, the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Narain Dhut (2007) 3 SCC 700 would be utilized to
understand the legal provisions and application of Sections 88-100 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 concerning
insurance claims. You would study this case to analyze how the Supreme Court interpreted and applied these sections in
resolving disputes related to insurance claims, gaining practical insights into the application of consumer protection laws
 in insurance-related matters throughout your internship activities such as research, analysis, and mock courtroom
exercises.

CONCLUSION

My internship experience at the law firm led by Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar has been
nothing short of transformative. Over the course of one month, I have been immersed in a
dynamic environment that has deepened my understanding of legal practice and equipped me
with invaluable skills for my future career in the legal profession.

Throughout this internship, I have had the privilege of working under the guidance of Senior
Advocate D. Bharath Kumar, an accomplished Advocate-on-Record (AOR) at the Supreme
Court of India. His mentorship has been instrumental in shaping my learning journey, providing
me with insights, guidance, and encouragement every step of the way.

One of the most enriching aspects of my internship has been the diverse range of tasks I have
undertaken. From drafting legal documents such as Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) to conducting
comprehensive research on various areas of law, I have been exposed to the multifaceted nature
of legal practice. Additionally, attending both virtual and physical court proceedings at the
Supreme Court of India and the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC)
has provided me with firsthand insights into courtroom dynamics and judicial proceedings.

Furthermore, my internship experience has underscored the importance of continuous learning

and staying updated on contemporary legal issues. Engaging in discussions with experienced
lawyers, analyzing significant case laws, and participating in mock courtroom proceedings have
deepened my understanding of legal principles and their practical application.

In conclusion, my internship experience has been a transformative journey that has enriched my
knowledge, honed my skills, and broadened my perspectives on the legal profession. I am deeply
grateful to Senior Advocate D. Bharath Kumar and the entire team for providing me with this
invaluable opportunity. As I embark on the next phase of my legal career, I carry with me the
lessons learned and experiences gained during this internship, which will undoubtedly shape my
future endeavors in the legal field.
ANNEXURE A