Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Mobile phone sensors and

supervised machine learning to


identify alcohol use events in young
adults

I. INTRODUCTION
Binge alcohol consumption, which is defined Traditional techniques of tracking alcohol
as having > 4/5 drinks (women/men) each intake depend mainly on self-report
occasion, is a major but avoidable public measures, retrospective surveys, or laboratory
health concern, with young persons testing, all of which have inherent flaws and
disproportionately impacted (Center for biases. Self-reported data are vulnerable to
Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, memory recall biases, social desirability
2016). Digital interventions are a potential effects, and underreporting, particularly
way to prevent excessive alcohol intake, with among those who may feel stigmatized or
greatest evidence for efficacy in young adults ashamed of their drinking patterns.
(Carey et al., 2012, Fowler et al., 2016). Still, Laboratory-based alcohol testing, while more
impacts of digital treatments are often minor objective, is sometimes impracticable for
(Berman et al., 2016, Suffoletto et al., 2015), capturing real-world drinking habits and
suggesting that designs are not optimal. settings. Furthermore, the difficulty, expense,
and invasiveness of standard monitoring
To promote longitudinal engagement and systems restrict their general acceptance and
impacts of digital interventions, the relevant efficacy in tracking alcohol consumption in
support material should be supplied to the realistic situations.
right individual at the right time (Nahum-
Shani et al., 2016). Therefore, a digital Recent improvements in sensor downsizing
intervention aimed at reducing binge drinking enable the potential to gather multi-modal
should deliver support ?in the moment?, that data constantly from mobile phones with
is, in the context of a drinking episode to minimum participant burden. Continuous
enhance motivation for setting and keeping smartphone sensing can gather time-stamped
drinking limits, and to reduce the likelihood data pieces that can be used to follow a
of negative alcohol-related consequences person's daily routine in line with a computer
(i.e., reinforce explicit intentions). To attain science-based ?context aware? theoretical
these aims, it is vital that a digital framework (Abowd et al., 1999). Phone
intervention be able to recognize when the sensor data has been demonstrated to be
person is drinking. beneficial in inferring other states such as
emotion (Mohr, Zhang, & Schueller, 2017).
Alcohol drinking amongst young adults is a Still, it remains uncertain if phone sensors
prevalent and complicated issue with may be beneficial in detecting times of
substantial implications for health, safety, and drinking.
social well-being. This group, often aged
between 18 and 25 years, experiences distinct In prior work (Bae et al., 2017), we discussed
obstacles and pressures that lead to the the computer engineering procedures
normalization and acceptability of excessive involved in leveraging phone sensors for
drinking practices. Whether motivated by detection of drinking periods. In this study,
peer pressure, societal standards, or cultural we expand upon existing work by detailing
factors, the frequency of intense episodic how sensor properties alter across periods of
drinking, popularly known as binge drinking, high-risk (e.g., binge) drinking, low-risk
remains dangerously high among young drinking, and non-drinking. We hypothesized
adults. that phone sensor features related to time
(Del Boca, Darkes, Greenbaum, & Goldman, laboratory conditions and showed potential
2004), movement patterns (Freisthler et al., for real-world applications.
2014, Gruenewald et al., 2014),
communication (Cavazos-Rehg et al., 2015, Similarly, Canzian and Musolesi (2015)
Moewaka Barnes et al., 2016), and examined GPS and accelerometer data from
psychomotor impairment (Scholey et al., participants' smartphones to estimate alcohol
2012, Suffoletto et al., 2017, Suffoletto et al., consumption patterns based on mobility
2017) would contribute to detection models. behaviors and activity levels. By employing
We also evaluated the time it takes for machine learning approaches, they were able
machine learning models to attain stability in to discern between times of drinking and non-
accuracy, and variations in model drinking with excellent accuracy,
performance on weekends vs weekdays. We demonstrating the potential of passive
highlight implications of our findings for sensing for alcohol monitoring in realistic
delivery of just-in-time mobile solutions. situations.

II. LITERARUTE REVIEW 2. Supervised Machine Learning for Event


The combination of mobile phone sensors Detection:
and supervised machine learning algorithms
has opened up new options for monitoring Supervised machine learning algorithms play
and intervening in alcohol consumption a significant role in processing and evaluating
habits among young adults. This section the data obtained from mobile phone sensors
presents a detailed overview of the current to identify alcohol consumption events. By
literature, concentrating on research that have training models on labeled datasets including
examined the usage of mobile phone sensors instances of drinking episodes and non-
and machine learning algorithms for events, machine learning algorithms may
recognizing alcohol consumption episodes learn to spot patterns and categorize new data
and offering just-in-time adaptive accordingly.
interventions (JTAIs).
A number of supervised learning approaches
1. Mobile Phone Sensors for Alcohol have been applied to alcohol event detection,
Monitoring: including support vector machines (SVM),
random forests, and deep neural networks.
Mobile phones are equipped with an array of For example, Sarker et al. (2016) deployed
sensors that may collect numerous SVM classifiers to identify episodes of heavy
behavioral, physiological, and environmental drinking based on characteristics retrieved
variables related to alcohol intake. from smartphone sensor data, obtaining
Accelerometers, GPS, microphones, and excellent sensitivity and specificity in
ambient light sensors, among others, give detecting alcohol consumption events.
potential for passive monitoring of behaviors
related with drinking episodes. For instance, Deep learning techniques, such as
alterations in mobility patterns, geographical convolutional neural networks (CNN) and
trajectories, speech traits, and social recurrent neural networks (RNN), have also
interactions have been associated to alcohol showed potential in alcohol event detection
use episodes. tasks. Liu et al. (2019) built a deep learning
system that integrates accelerometer and GPS
Several studies have established the data from smartphones to automatically
feasibility and usefulness of employing detect drinking episodes in real-time. The
mobile phone sensors for alcohol monitoring. model displayed improved performance
Bae et al. (2017) created a mobile application compared to typical machine learning
named "ALCO-Check" that employs the techniques, showing the promise of deep
smartphone's accelerometer and microphone learning for alcohol monitoring applications.
to identify drinking episodes based on
changes in movement and sound patterns 3. Implications for Just-in-Time Adaptive
associated with pouring and consuming Interventions (JTAIs):
alcohol. The system exhibited great accuracy
in detecting alcohol consumption events in The combination of mobile phone sensors
and supervised machine learning for alcohol social engagements, gatherings, and leisure
monitoring has important implications for the activities that may entail alcohol use.
development of just-in-time adaptive
treatments (JTAIs). JTAIs are individualized 2. Preprocessing:
intervention methods supplied via mobile
technology at opportune periods to address Once the data is acquired, preparation
specific behavioral difficulties or triggers. activities will be undertaken to clean and
prepare the dataset for analysis. This may
By utilizing real-time data from mobile entail filtering out noise and anomalies from
phone sensors, JTAIs can give timely and sensor readings, such as outliers and
contextually relevant treatments to persons at erroneous data points. Additionally, data
risk of excessive drinking. For example, from disparate sensors may be synced and
when a drinking incident is recognized, the aligned to provide temporal coherence across
mobile phone might offer targeted messages, modalities.
reminders, or coping skills to assist the user
make healthier choices or minimize alcohol Normalization techniques may also be
intake. Additionally, JTAIs may alter utilized to normalize sensor readings and
intervention delivery based on contextual decrease variability between people and
information such as location, time of day, equipment. Missing data imputation methods
social setting, and mood, maximizing will be employed to manage any gaps or
intervention efficacy. pauses in data gathering, maintaining
continuity and completeness of the dataset.
III. PROPOSED METHODOLOGY
3. Feature Extraction:
The suggested methodology intends to
employ mobile phone sensors and supervised Feature extraction plays a critical role in
machine learning techniques to identify discovering significant patterns and traits
alcohol consumption episodes in young linked with alcohol consumption occurrences.
adults and study the implications for just-in- Features will be retrieved from the
time adaptive treatments (JTAIs). This preprocessed sensor data utilizing domain-
section explains the essential phases involved specific algorithms and signal processing
in the research process, including data techniques.
collection, preprocessing, feature extraction,
model training, and assessment. For accelerometer data, variables such as
movement intensity, frequency domain
1. Data Collection: measurements, and patterns of physical
activity will be retrieved to identify variations
The first phase involves gathering data from in movement patterns indicative of alcohol
young adult participants using mobile phone intake. GPS data will be examined to extract
applications specialized for alcohol location-based information, including venue
monitoring. Participants will be recruited kinds, proximity to alcohol-serving locations,
from varied demographic backgrounds, and travel trajectories related with drinking
including college students, young activities.
professionals, and persons from varying
socioeconomic positions. Data collection will Microphone data will be examined to extract
require getting informed consent from acoustic parameters linked to speech patterns,
participants and verifying adherence to voice characteristics, and background noise
ethical rules for human subjects research. levels during probable drinking episodes.
Ambient light sensor measurements may give
The mobile phone application will passively contextual information regarding the time of
gather sensor data, including accelerometer, day and environmental circumstances linked
GPS, microphone, and ambient light sensor with alcohol usage incidents.
readings, at regular intervals (e.g., every
minute). Participants will be instructed to 4. Model Training and Evaluation:
bring their cellphones with them while they
go about their everyday activities, including Supervised machine learning algorithms will
be trained on the retrieved characteristics to human subjects research. Measures will be
construct predictive models for alcohol made to safeguard participant data, including
incident detection. A range of classification encryption, anonymization, and secure
techniques, including support vector storage procedures.
machines (SVM), random forests, and deep
neural networks, will be studied to discover
the best successful strategy for the problem.

The dataset will be separated into training,


validation, and test sets to train and assess the
performance of the machine learning models.
Cross-validation approaches, such as k-fold
cross-validation, will be applied to test model
generalization and resilience.

Model performance will be assessed using


measures such as accuracy, sensitivity,
specificity, area under the receiver operating
characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), and F1
score. Additionally, qualitative assessments
may be undertaken to evaluate the
interpretability and clinical significance of
the observed alcohol consumption episodes.

5. Implications for Just-in-Time Adaptive


Interventions (JTAIs):

The findings from the machine learning


models will influence the creation of just-in-
time adaptive interventions (JTAIs) aimed at
lowering dangerous drinking habits among
young adults. Based on the observed alcohol
consumption episodes, targeted interventions
will be offered via the mobile phone
application to provide timely assistance,
information, and resources to persons at risk.

Interventions may include individualized


feedback messages, coping tactics,
mindfulness exercises, or connections to
support resources based on individual
preferences and requirements. Contextual
information such as location, time of day,
social environment, and mood may be
utilized to adapt intervention delivery and
enhance efficacy.

6. Ethical Considerations:

Throughout the study process, ethical


concerns will be crucial to preserve
participant privacy, confidentiality, and
autonomy. Informed permission will be
sought from all participants, and data
collecting techniques will comply to relevant
privacy rules and institutional norms for

You might also like