Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRICS
BRICS
BRICS is an acronym for an association of five major emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Here's some information about
BRICS:
1. *Origins*: The term "BRIC" was initially coined in 2001 by Jim O'Neill, an economist at Goldman Sachs, to describe the four emerging economies of Brazil, Russia,
India, and China. South Africa later joined in 2010, leading to the acronym becoming BRICS.
2. *Purpose*: The primary objective of BRICS is to promote cooperation and mutual assistance between its member countries on issues of common interest, especially
in economic development, trade, finance, and geopolitics.
3. *Economic Power*: Collectively, BRICS countries account for about 41% of the world's population and over 24% of the world's GDP (as of the last data available
before my last update in 2022). The group represents some of the fastest-growing economies in the world.
4. *Annual Summits*: The BRICS countries hold annual summits where leaders discuss various issues, formulating strategies for cooperation and collaboration in
multiple sectors.
5. *New Development Bank (NDB)*: Established by BRICS in 2014, the NDB aims to mobilize resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in
BRICS and other emerging economies and developing countries.
6. *Political Cooperation*: Apart from economic cooperation, BRICS countries also engage in political dialogue and coordination on various global issues, such as
climate change, terrorism, and reform of global governance institutions.
7. *Challenges*: While BRICS countries have significant economic potential, they also face challenges such as infrastructure deficits, income inequality, and geopolitical
tensions that can sometimes hamper their collective objectives.
8. *Criticism*: BRICS has faced criticism for lacking concrete achievements and for being a disparate group of countries with differing economic structures, political
systems, and strategic interests.
Despite these challenges, BRICS remains an important forum for dialogue and cooperation among emerging economies and plays a crucial role in shaping global
economic and political landscapes
- BRICS countries have been working towards increasing intra-BRICS trade and investment. They have established mechanisms to facilitate trade, reduce trade
barriers, and promote investments among member countries.
- They have also discussed the possibility of creating a BRICS-wide free trade area, although progress on this front has been slow.
- BRICS countries recognize the importance of technology and innovation in driving economic growth. They have discussed collaboration in areas such as information
technology, biotechnology, and space exploration.
- Initiatives like the BRICS Innovation Cooperation Action Plan have been launched to foster innovation and technological cooperation among member countries.
3. *Health Cooperation*:
- In the wake of global health challenges, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, BRICS countries have emphasized the importance of health cooperation. They have
discussed joint efforts in vaccine development, healthcare infrastructure, and pandemic response.
- The BRICS Vaccine Research and Development Center has been proposed to promote vaccine research and production in the member countries.
- BRICS countries aim to enhance cultural and academic exchanges to foster mutual understanding and cooperation among their peoples. Programs like the BRICS
Network University and the BRICS Film Festival have been initiated to promote cultural and educational ties.
5. *Geopolitical Influence*:
- BRICS countries, due to their economic size and growth potential, have sought to increase their geopolitical influence on the global stage. They have advocated for a
more multipolar world order and called for reforms in global governance institutions like the United Nations, IMF, and World Bank to better reflect the interests of
emerging economies.
6. *Environmental Sustainability*:
- Recognizing the importance of environmental sustainability and combating climate change, BRICS countries have discussed joint initiatives in renewable energy,
sustainable development, and environmental protection.
- The BRICS Environment Ministers' Meeting serves as a platform for discussing environmental issues and promoting cooperation on climate change mitigation and
adaptation.
7. *Infrastructure Development*:
- Infrastructure development is a key focus area for BRICS countries, given its critical role in driving economic growth and development. They have discussed
cooperation in infrastructure financing, planning, and construction through mechanisms like the BRICS Infrastructure Cooperation Working Group.
In conclusion, BRICS is a multifaceted platform that encompasses economic, political, technological, and cultural cooperation among its member countries. While
challenges and differences exist, the group continues to work towards strengthening mutual understanding and collaboration to realize their collective potential and
contribute to global peace, stability, and prosperity..
BRIC is a term describing the foreign investment strategies grouping acronym that stands for Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The separate BRICS
organisation would go on to become a political and economic organization largely based on such grouping.[1]
The term was first coined by economist Jim O'Neill and later championed by his employer Goldman Sachs in 2001. O'Neill identified the four countries as
rising economic powers which were at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development. Goldman Sachs, of which O'Neill was the head of
global economics research, would continue reporting and investing in their BRIC fund until 2015.[2] The grouping is typically rendered as "the BRIC",
"the BRIC countries", "the BRIC economies", or alternatively as the "Big Four".[3][4][5][6]
The acronym was co-opted by the countries themselves beginning in the late-2000s. The 1st BRIC summit in 2009, which founded the BRICS
organisation, was held between the leaders of the four countries, with later summits involving South Africa beginning in 2010.[7][8] O'Neill commented on
the 2010 summit by drawing a distinction between his BRIC term and the BRICS organisation, arguing that South Africa was too small as an economy to
join the BRIC ranks.[9]
Jim O'Neill, a global economist at Goldman Sachs at the time, proposed that the economic potential of Brazil, Russia, India and China is such that they
could become among the most dominant economies by 2050.[10] These countries encompass over 25% of the world's land coverage and 40% of the
world's population and hold a combined GDP (PPP) of $20 trillion. On almost every scale, they would be the largest entity on the global stage. These
four countries are among the biggest and fastest-growing emerging markets.{Incal 2011}
Per
cen
R t
a incr
203
n 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 eas
Co 0
k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e
unt US
2 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 fro
ry DA[
0 0 5 0 5 0 26]
5 0 5 0 6 m
5 200
0 6 to
205
0
Unite
38, 33, 29, 26, 22, 20, 17, 16, 14, 13,
d 24,80
3 51 90 82 09 81 08 97 19 53 24 190%
State 0
4 4 3 7 7 7 8 4 5 5
s
4 Brazi 11, 8,7 6,6 4,9 3,7 4,000 2,8 2,1 1,7 2,0 1,0 968%
l 36 40 31 63 20 31 94 20 87 64
Gross Domestic Product in 2006 US$ billions[25]
Per
cen
R t
a incr
203
n 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 eas
Co 0
k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e
unt US
2 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 fro
ry DA[
0 0 5 0 5 0 26]
5 0 5 0 6 m
5 200
0 6 to
205
0
Mexi 9,3 7,2 5,4 4,1 3,0 2,3 1,7 1,3 1,0 85
5 2,300 997%
co 40 04 71 02 68 03 42 27 09 1
Russi 8,5 7,4 6,3 5,2 4,2 3,3 2,5 1,9 1,3 98
6 2,400 773%
a 80 20 20 65 65 41 54 00 71 2
Note: All data above is from Goldman Sachs, except the 2030 USDA column is data from U.S. Department of Agriculture (2030 USDA) about World's 20 Largest
Economies in 2030, but only 16 match with Goldman Sachs data. In 2030 USDA, Mexico and Indonesia will topple South Korea (please see Section Proposed
inclusions). There is no South Africa of BRIC S in the above table. In 2030, the sole country from Africa is Nigeria and the US is still number one, but China almost
overtakes the US.
Gross Domestic Product per capita (real)[25]
Rank 2050 Country 2050 2045 2040 2035 2030 2025 2020 2015 2010 2006 Percent increase from 2006 to 2050
57,44
1 United States 91,683 83,489 76,044 69,019 62,717 53,502 50,200 47,014 44,379 106%
6
36,81
2 South Korea 90,294 75,979 63,924 53,449 44,602 29,868 26,012 21,602 18,161 397%
3
United 52,22
3 79,234 73,807 67,391 61,049 55,904 49,173 45,591 41,543 38,108 107%
Kingdom 0
26,06
4 Russia 78,435 65,708 54,221 43,800 34,368 19,311 13,971 9,833 6,909 1,037%
1
48,62
5 Canada 76,002 69,531 63,464 57,728 52,663 45,961 43,449 40,541 38,071 99%
1
48,42
6 France 75,253 68,252 62,136 56,562 52,327 44,811 41,332 38,380 36,045 108%
9
45,03
7 Germany 68,253 62,658 57,118 51,710 47,263 43,223 40,589 37,474 34,588 97%
3
46,41
8 Japan 66,846 60,492 55,756 52,345 49,975 42,385 38,650 36,194 34,021 96%
9
Gross Domestic Product per capita (real)[25]
Rank 2050 Country 2050 2045 2040 2035 2030 2025 2020 2015 2010 2006 Percent increase from 2006 to 2050
17,68
9 Mexico 63,149 49,393 38,255 29,417 22,694 13,979 11,176 8,972 7,918 697%
5
41,35
10 Italy 58,545 52,760 48,070 44,948 43,195 38,990 35,908 32,948 31,123 88%
8
12,99
11 Brazil 49,759 38,149 29,026 21,924 16,694 10,375 8,427 6,882 5,657 779%
6
12,68
12 China 49,650 39,719 30,951 23,511 17,522 8,829 5,837 3,463 2,041 2,332%
8
11,74
13 Turkey 45,595 34,971 26,602 20,046 15,188 9,291 7,460 6,005 5,545 722%
3
14 Vietnam 33,472 23,932 16,623 11,148 7,245 4,583 2,834 1,707 1,001 655 5,010%
15 Iran 32,676 26,231 20,746 15,979 12,139 9,328 7,345 5,888 4,652 3,768 767%
16 Indonesia 22,395 15,642 10,784 7,365 5,123 3,711 2,813 2,197 1,724 1,508 1,385%
17 India 20,836 14,446 9,802 6,524 4,360 2,979 2,091 1,492 1,061 817 2,450%
18 Pakistan 20,500 14,025 9,443 6,287 4,287 3,080 2,352 1,880 1,531 1,281 1,500%
19 Philippines 20,388 14,260 9,815 6,678 4,635 3,372 2,591 2,075 1,688 1,312 1,453%
20 Nigeria 13,014 8,934 6,117 4,191 2,944 2,161 1,665 1,332 1,087 919 1,316%
Gross Domestic Product per capita (real)[25]
Rank 2050 Country 2050 2045 2040 2035 2030 2025 2020 2015 2010 2006 Percent increase from 2006 to 2050
21 Egypt 11,786 7,066 5,183 3,775 2,744 2,035 1,568 1,260 897 778 808%
22 Bangladesh 5,235 3,767 2,698 1,917 1,384 1,027 790 627 510 427 1,125%
Groups Countries 2050 2045 2040 2035 2030 2025 2020 2015 2010 2006
The following three tables are lists of economies by incremental GDP from 2006 to 2050 by Goldman Sachs. They illustrate that the BRICs and N11 nations are
replacing G7 nations as the main contributors to the world's economic growth. From 2020 to 2050, nine of the ten largest countries by incremental GDP are occupied
by the BRICs and N11 nations, in which the United States remains to be the only G7 member as one of the three biggest contributors to the global economic growth. [25]
According to The World Bank Doing Business report 2019 the BRIC economies introduced a total of 21 reforms, with getting electricity and trading across borders the
most common areas of improvement.[28]
History
The BRIC alliance has its roots in the Russia-India-China (RIC) strategic triangle, which was envisaged by Russian prime minister Yevgeny Primakov in the 1990s.
Various sources refer to a purported "original" BRIC agreement that predates the Goldman Sachs thesis. Some of these sources claim that President Vladimir Putin of
Russia was the driving force behind this original cooperative coalition of developing BRIC countries. However, thus far, no text has been made public of any formal
agreement to which all four BRIC states are signatories. This does not mean, however, that they have not reached a multitude of bilateral or even quadrilateral
agreements. Evidence of agreements of this type are abundant and are available on the foreign ministry websites of each of the four countries. Trilateral agreements
and frameworks made among the BRICs include the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (member states include Russia and China, observers include India) and the
IBSA Trilateral Forum, which unites Brazil, India, and South Africa in annual dialogues. Also important to note is the G-20 coalition of developing states which includes
all the BRICs.
In an August 2010 op-ed, Jim O'Neill of Goldman Sachs argued that Africa could be considered the next BRIC.[29] Analysts from rival banks have sought to move
beyond the BRIC concept, by introducing their own groupings of emerging markets. Proposals include CIVETs (Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey and South
Africa), the EAGLES (Emerging and Growth-Leading Economies) and the 7 percent club (which includes those countries which have averaged economic growth of at
least 7 percent a year).[30]
South Africa sought BRIC membership since 2009 and the process for formal admission began as early as August 2010.[31] South Africa was officially admitted as a
BRIC nation on 24 December 2010, after being invited by China and the other BRIC countries to join the group.[32] The capital "S" in BRICS stands for South Africa.
President Jacob Zuma attend the BRICS summit in Sanya in April 2011 as a full member. South Africa stands at a unique position to influence African economic growth
and investment. According to Jim O'Neill of Goldman Sachs who originally coined the term, Africa's combined current gross domestic product is reasonably similar to
that of Brazil and Russia, and slightly above that of India.[33] South Africa is a "gateway" to Southern Africa and Africa in general as the most developed African
country.[33] China is South Africa's largest trading partner, and India wants to increase commercial ties with Africa.[8] South Africa is also Africa's largest economy, but
as number 31 in global GDP economies it is far behind its new partners.[8]
Jim O'Neill expressed surprise when South Africa joined BRIC since South Africa's economy is a quarter of the size of Russia's (the least economically powerful BRIC
nation).[34] He believed that the potential was there but did not anticipate inclusion of South Africa at this stage.[33] Martyn Davies, a South African emerging
markets expert, argued that the decision to invite South Africa made little commercial sense but was politically astute given China's attempts to establish a foothold in
Africa. Further, South Africa's inclusion in BRICS may translate to greater South African support for China in global fora.[34] He has great belief that the "S" in "BRICS"
could be replaced eventually by SADC.
African credentials are important geopolitically, giving BRICS a four-continent breadth, influence and trade opportunities.[8] South Africa's addition is a deft political
move that further enhances BRICS' power and status.[8] In the original essay that coined the term, Goldman Sachs did not argue that the BRICs would organize
themselves into an economic bloc, or a formal trading association which this move signifies.[citation needed]
Marketing
The São Paulo Stock Exchange is the third-largest exchange operator by market value in the world.[35]
The BRIC term is also used by companies who refer to the four named countries as key to their emerging markets strategies. By comparison, the reduced acronym IC
would not be attractive, although the term "Chindia" is often used. BRIC's study specifically focuses on large countries, not necessarily the wealthiest or the most
productive and was never intended to be an investment thesis. If investors read Goldman's research carefully and agreed with the conclusions, then they would gain
exposure to Asian debt and equity markets rather than to Latin America. According to estimates provided by the USDA, the wealthiest regions outside of the G6 in
2015 will be Hong Kong, South Korea and Singapore. Combined with China and India, these five economies are likely to be the world's five most influential economies
outside of the G6.
On the other hand, when the "R" in BRIC is extended beyond Russia and is used as a loose term to include all of Eastern Europe as well, then the BRIC story becomes
more compelling. At issue are the multiple serious problems which confront Russia (potentially unstable government, environmental degradation, critical lack of
modern infrastructure, etc.[citation needed]), and the comparatively much lower growth rate seen in Brazil. However, Brazil's lower growth rate obscures the fact that
the country is wealthier than China or India on a per-capita basis, has a more developed and global integrated financial system and has an economy potentially more
diverse than the other BRICs due to its raw material and manufacturing potential. Many other Eastern European countries, such as Poland, Romania, the Czech
Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, and several others were able to continually sustain high economic growth rates and do not experience some of the problems
that Russia experiences or experience them to a lesser extent. In terms of GDP per capita in 2008, Brazil ranked 64th, Russia 42nd, India 113th, and China 89th. By
comparison, South Korea ranked 24th and Singapore 3rd.
Brazil's stock market, the Bovespa, has gone from approximately 9,000 in September 2002 to over 70,000 in May 2008. Government policies have favored investment
(lowering interest rates), retiring foreign debt and expanding growth, and a reformulation of the tax system is being voted in the congress. The British author and
researcher Mark Kobayashi-Hillary wrote a book in 2007 titled Building a Future with BRICs for European publisher Springer Verlag that examines the growth of the
BRICs region and its effect on global sourcing. Contributors to the book include Nandan Nilekani, and Shiv Nadar.
International law
Brazilian lawyer and author Adler Martins has published a paper called "Contratos Internacionais entre os países do BRIC"[36] (International Agreements Among BRIC
countries) which highlights the international conventions ratified by the BRIC countries, which allow them to maintain trade and investment activities safely within the
group. Martin's study is being further developed by the Federal University of the Minas Gerais State, in Brazil.
Financial diversification
It has been argued that geographic diversification would eventually generate superior risk-adjusted returns for long-term global investors by reducing overall portfolio
risk while capturing some of the higher rates of return offered by the emerging markets of Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America.[37] By doing so, these institutional
investors have contributed to the financial and economic development of key emerging nations such as Brazil, India, China, and Russia. For global investors, India and
China constitute both large-scale production platforms and reservoirs of new consumers, whereas Russia is viewed essentially as an exporter of oil and commodities-
Brazil and Latin America being somehow "in the middle".
Criticism
Academics and experts have suggested that China is in a league of its own compared to the other BRIC countries.[38] As David Rothkopf wrote in Foreign Policy,
"Without China, the BRICs are just the BRI, a bland, soft cheese that is primarily known for the whine [sic] that goes with it. China is the muscle of the group and the
Chinese know it. They have effective veto power over any BRIC initiatives because without them, who cares really? They are the one with the big reserves. They are
the biggest potential market. They are the U.S. partner in the G2 (imagine the coverage a G2 meeting gets vs. a G8 meeting) and the E2 (no climate deal without them)
and so on."[39] Deutsche Bank Research said in a report that "economically, financially and politically, China overshadows and will continue to overshadow the other
BRICs". It added that China's economy is larger than that of the three other BRIC economies (Brazil, Russia, and India) combined. Moreover, China's exports and its
official foreign-exchange reserves are more than twice as large as those of the other BRICs combined.[40] In that perspective, some pension investment experts have
argued that "China alone accounts for more than 70% of the combined GDP growth generated by the BRIC countries [from 1999 to 2010]: if there is a BRIC miracle it's
first and foremost a Chinese one".[41] The "growth gap" between China and other large emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia and India can be attributed to a
large extent to China's early focus on ambitious infrastructure projects: while China invested roughly 9% of its GDP on infrastructure in the 1990s and 2000s, most
emerging economies invested only 2% to 5% of their GDP. This considerable spending gap allowed the Chinese economy to grow at near-optimal conditions while
many South American and South Asian economies suffered from various development bottlenecks (poor transportation, aging power grids, mediocre schools).[42]
Other critics suggest that BRIC is nothing more than a neat acronym for the four largest emerging market economies,[citation needed] but in economic and political
terms nothing else (apart from the fact that they are all big emerging markets) links the four. Two are manufacturing-based economies and big importers (China and
India), but two are huge exporters of natural resources (Brazil and Russia). The Economist, in its special report on Brazil, expressed the following view: "In some ways,
Brazil is the steadiest of the BRICs. Unlike China and Russia, it is a full-blooded democracy; unlike India, it has no serious disputes with its neighbors. It is the only BRIC
without a nuclear bomb". The Heritage Foundation's Indices of Economic Freedom, which measures factors such as protection of property rights and free trade ranks
Brazil "moderately free" above the other BRICs, which are ranked as "mostly unfree".[43] Henry Kissinger has stated that the BRIC nations have no hope of acting
together as a coherent bloc in world affairs and that any cooperation will be the result of forces acting on the individual nations.[citation needed]
In a not-so-subtle dig critical of the term as nothing more than a shorthand for emerging markets generally, critics have suggested a correlating term, CEMENT
(Countries in Emerging Markets Excluded by New Terminology). Whilst they accept there has been spectacular growth of the BRIC economies, these gains have largely
been the result of the strength of emerging markets generally, and that strength comes through having BRICs and CEMENT.[44]
Based on IMF's World Economic Outlook Database, October 2016, the top economies in 2021 (by projected nominal gross domestic product (GDP)) are going to be
China, the U.S., India, Japan, Germany, Russia, Indonesia, Brazil, the U.K., and France respectively.[45] Nowadays Indonesia is not BRIC country, but as solely emerging
economies in the list sets on seven in projected 2021 top economies. There are no South Africa and no (South Korea, Mexico, (GCC Arab countries—Saudi Arabia,
Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman and the United Arab Emirates), Eastern Europe and Turkey) as mentioned above.
Proposed inclusions
Mexico and South Korea are currently the world's 13th and 15th largest by nominal GDP just behind the BRIC and G7 economies. Both are experiencing rapid GDP
growth of 5% every year, a figure comparable to Brazil from the original BRICs. Jim O'Neill, expert from the same bank and creator of the economic thesis, stated that
in 2001 when the paper was created, it did not consider Mexico, but today it has been included because the country is experiencing the same factors that the other
countries first included present.[46][47] While South Korea was not originally included in the BRICs, recent solid economic growth led to Goldman Sachs proposing to
add Mexico and South Korea to the BRICs, changing the acronym to BRIMCK, with Jim O'Neill pointing out that Korea "is better placed than most others to realize its
potential due to its growth-supportive fundamentals".[48] Again Jim O'Neil recently created the term MIKT that stands for Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, and Turkey.
[49]
A Goldman Sachs paper published later in December 2005 explained why Mexico and South Korea were not included in the original BRICs. According to the paper,[4]
among the other countries they looked at, only Mexico and South Korea have the potential to rival the BRICs, but they are economies that they decided to exclude
initially because they looked to them as already more developed. However, due to the popularity of the Goldman Sachs thesis, "BRIMC" and "BRICK" are becoming
more generic marketing terms to refer to these six countries. Because of the popularity of the Goldman Sachs thesis "BRIC", this term has sometimes been extended
whereby "BRICK"[50][51] (K for South Korea) and "BRIMC"[46][47] (M for Mexico) refer to these proposed expansions. Other proposed groupings include "BRICA"
(GCC Arab countries—Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman and the United Arab Emirates)[52] and "BRICET" (including Eastern Europe and Turkey)[53] and have
become more generic marketing terms to refer to these emerging markets.
In their paper "BRICs and Beyond", Goldman Sachs stated that "Mexico, the four BRIC countries and South Korea should not be really thought of as emerging markets
in the classical sense", adding that they are a "critical part of the modern globalised economy" and "just as central to its functioning as the current G7".[54]
The term is primarily used in the economic and financial spheres as well as in academia. Its usage has grown specially in the investment sector, where it is used to refer
to the bonds emitted by these emerging markets governments.[55][56][57]
Founding
The term BRIC was originally developed in the context of foreign investment strategies. It was introduced in the 2001 publication, Building Better Global Economic
BRICs by then-chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill.[17][18]
The foreign ministers of the initial four BRIC General states (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) met in New York City in September 2006 at the margins of the General
Debate of the UN Assembly, beginning a series of high-level meetings.[19] A full-scale diplomatic meeting was held in Yekaterinburg, Russia, on 16 June 2009.[20]
The BRIC grouping's 1st formal summit, also held in Yekaterinburg, commenced on 16 June 2009,[21] with Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Dmitry Medvedev, Manmohan Singh,
and Hu Jintao, the respective leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, all attending. [22] The summit's focus was on improving the global economic situation and
reforming financial institutions, and discussed how the 4 countries could better co-operate in the future.[21][22] There was further discussion of ways that developing
countries, such as 3/4 of the BRIC members, could become more involved in global affairs. [22]
In the aftermath of the 2009 Yekaterinburg summit, the BRIC nations announced the need for a new global reserve currency, which would have to be "diverse, stable
and predictable."[23] Although the statement that was released did not directly criticize the perceived "dominance" of the US dollar – something that Russia had
criticized in the past – it did spark a fall in the value of the dollar against other major currencies. [24]
In 2010, South Africa began efforts to join the BRIC grouping, and the process for its formal admission began in August of that year. [25] South Africa officially became a
member nation on 24 December 2010, after being formally invited by China to join [26] and subsequently accepted by other BRIC countries.[25] The group was renamed
BRICS – with the "S" standing for South Africa – to reflect the group's expanded membership. [27] In April 2011, the President of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, attended
the 2011 BRICS summit in Sanya, China, as a full member.[28][29][30]
Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro and Russian president Vladimir Putin during the BRICS in Brasília, Brazil
In June 2012, the BRICS nations pledged $75 billion to boost the lending power of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, this loan was conditional on IMF
voting reforms.[31] In March 2013, during the fifth BRICS summit in Durban, the member countries agreed to create a global financial institution to cooperate with the
western-dominated IMF and World Bank.[32] They planned to set up this New Development Bank by 2014.[33]
BRICS Tower headquarters in Shanghai
At the BRICS leaders meeting in St Petersburg in September 2013, China committed $41 billion towards the pool; Brazil, India, and Russia $18 billion each; and South
Africa $5 billion. China, who held the world's largest foreign exchange reserves and contributes the bulk of the currency pool, wanted a more significant managing role.
China also wanted to be the location of the reserve.[34] In October 2013, Russia's Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said that creating a $100 billion in funds designated
to steady currency markets would be taken in early 2014. The Brazilian finance minister, Guido Mantega, confirmed that the fund would be created by March 2014.
[35]
However, by April 2014, the currency reserve pool and development bank had yet to be set up, and the date was rescheduled to 2015. [36]
In July 2014, during the sixth BRICS summit in Fortaleza, the BRICS signed the document to create the US$100 billion New Development Bank (formerly known as the
"BRICS Development Bank") and a reserve currency pool worth over another US$100 billion. Documents on cooperation between BRICS export credit agencies and an
agreement of cooperation on innovation were also inked.[citation needed] The Fortaleza summit was followed by a BRICS meeting with the Union of South American
Nations presidents in Brasilia.[37]
Other initiatives
Since 2011, the National Institutes of Statistics of the BRICS group of countries (IBGE, Rosstat, the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the Central Statistics Office
(India) and Statistics South Africa) produce an annual joint statistical publication in order to put statistical production in perspective, compare adopted methodologies
and statistical results. The publication serves as single data platform for the mutual benefit of participating countries.
Since 2012, the BRICS group of countries have been planning an optical fibre submarine communications cable system to carry telecommunications between the BRICS
countries, known as the BRICS Cable.[38] Part of the motivation for the project was the spying of the U.S. National Security Agency on all telecommunications that
flowed in and out of United States territory.[39] As of 2023, construction of the proposed cable network had not started.[citation needed]
In August 2019, the communications ministers of the BRICS countries signed a letter of intent to cooperate in the Information and Communication Technology sector.
This agreement was signed in the fifth edition of meeting of communication ministers of countries member of the group [40] held in Brasília, Brazil.
The New Development Bank plans on giving out $15 billion to member states to help their struggling economies. Member countries are hoping for a smooth
comeback and a continuation of economic trade pre-COVID-19. The 2020 BRICS summit was held virtually in St. Petersburg, Russia and discussed how to handle the
COVID-19 pandemic and how to fix the multilateral system via reforms.[41] During the 13th BRICS summit, in 2021, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for a
transparent investigation into the origins of COVID-19 under the World Health Organization with the full cooperation of "all countries", and Chinese leader Xi Jinping
spoke directly afterwards, calling on BRICS countries to "oppose politicisation" of the process. [42]
In May 2023, South Africa announced that they would be giving diplomatic immunity to Vladimir Putin and other Russian officials so that they could attend the 15th
BRICS Summit despite the ICC arrest warrant for Putin.[43][44] In July 2023, the Russian president announced that he will not personally attend the BRICS summit in
Johannesburg on 22–24 August despite good relations with the South African government. Russian news channels noted that Putin will remotely participate online in
all BRICS leaders’ sessions, including its Business Forum, and also deliver his remarks virtually. [45]
2024 expansion
In August 2023, at the 15th BRICS Summit, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that 6 emerging market group countries
(Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) had been invited to join the bloc. Full membership was scheduled to take effect on 1
January 2024.[46][47][48] However, the Argentine general election in November 2023 led to a change in president to Javier Milei, who had committed to withdraw the
country's membership application.[49] On 30 November 2023, incoming Foreign Minister of Argentina Diana Mondino confirmed that Argentina would not join the
BRICS.[50] On 29 December 2023 the Government of Argentina sent a letter to all BRICS leaders to officially announce its withdrawal from the application process. [51]
Saudi Arabia did not join BRICS at the start of 2024 as had been planned. However, they announced in mid January that they were still considering membership. [52]
The aim of latest expansion is touted as part of a plan to build a multipolar world order that puts weight to hitherto subdued voices of the Global South and brings
them to the centre of the world agenda.[53]
In 2010, South Africa began efforts to join the BRIC grouping, and the process for its formal admission began in August of that year.[25] South Africa
officially became a member nation on 24 December 2010, after being formally invited by China to join[26] and subsequently accepted by other BRIC
countries.[25] The group was renamed BRICS – with the "S" standing for South Africa – to reflect the group's expanded membership.[27] In April 2011,
the President of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, attended the 2011 BRICS summit in Sanya, China, as a full member.[28][29][30]
New Development Bank
Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro and Russian president Vladimir Putin during the BRICS in Brasília, Brazil
In June 2012, the BRICS nations pledged $75 billion to boost the lending power of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, this loan was
conditional on IMF voting reforms.[31] In March 2013, during the fifth BRICS summit in Durban, the member countries agreed to create a global financial
institution to cooperate with the western-dominated IMF and World Bank.[32] They planned to set up this New Development Bank by 2014.[33]
BRICS Tower headquarters in Shanghai
At the BRICS leaders meeting in St Petersburg in September 2013, China committed $41 billion towards the pool; Brazil, India, and Russia $18 billion
each; and South Africa $5 billion. China, who held the world's largest foreign exchange reserves and contributes the bulk of the currency pool, wanted a
more significant managing role. China also wanted to be the location of the reserve.[34] In October 2013, Russia's Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said
that creating a $100 billion in funds designated to steady currency markets would be taken in early 2014. The Brazilian finance minister, Guido Mantega,
confirmed that the fund would be created by March 2014.[35] However, by April 2014, the currency reserve pool and development bank had yet to be set
up, and the date was rescheduled to 2015.[36]
Summits
The grouping has held annual summits since 2009, with member countries taking turns to host. Prior to South Africa's admission, two BRIC summits were held, in 2009
and 2010. The first five-member BRICS summit was held in 2011. The most recent BRICS leaders' summit took place virtually on 23 June 2022 hosted by China. [54]
[55]
India hosted the BRICS 2021 summit in New Delhi and, amid tensions with China, Chinese leader Xi Jinping had made a soft move by supporting India's
Chairmanship in 2021.[56]
Sr. Host
Date(s) Host leader Location Notes
No. country
The summit was to discuss the global recession taking place at the time,
future cooperation among states, and trade. Some of the specific topics
Dmitry Yekaterinburg (Sevastianov's discussed were food, trade, climate trade, and security for the members.
1st 16 June 2009 Russia
Medvedev House) They called out for a more influential voice and representation for up-
and-coming markets. Note at the time South Africa was not yet admitted
to the BRICS organization at the time.[57]
3rd 14 April 2011 China Hu Jintao Sanya (Sheraton Sanya Resort) First summit to include South Africa alongside the
original BRIC countries. The third summit had members debating on the
global and internal economies of countries.[57]
The fifth summit discusses the New Development Bank proposition and
South
5th 26–27 March 2013 Jacob Zuma Durban (Durban ICC) Contingent Reserve Agreement. BRICS also announced the Business
Africa
Council and its Think Tank Council.[58]
Joint summit with BIMSTEC. The eighth BRICS summit debated on topics
Narendra like counter-terrorism, economies, and climate change. BRICS also issued
8th 15–16 October 2016 India Benaulim (Taj Exotica)
Modi the Goa Declaration and Action Plan, hoping to harden their
relationships.[57]
9th 3–5 September 2017 China Xi Jinping Xiamen (Xiamen International Joint summit with EMDCD. The ninth summit was an event that talked
Conference Center) about a bright future for BRICS and what their goals intend to be. They
still covered and debated international and regional issues with one
another; hopeful to keep moving forward.[57]
South Cyril Johannesburg (Sandton The tenth summit had the members discuss their rising industries. Hoping
10th 25–27 July 2018
Africa Ramaphosa Convention Centre) they can cut a bigger slice of the industry market.
Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab
Emirates were invited to join the bloc. Full membership was scheduled to
South Cyril Johannesburg (Sandton take effect on 1 January 2024.[47][48] On December 29, 2023, the
15th 22–24 August 2023
Africa Ramaphosa Convention Centre) Government of Argentina sent a letter to all BRICS leaders officially
declining the invitation to join the bloc.[51] Saudi Arabia has not yet
confirmed its acceptance.[67]
[68]
16th October 2024 Russia TBD Kazan
Member states
GDP
Populatio Densit per
Fla Area HDI[57] Official Accessio
Country Capital n y cap. Currency Leaders
g (km2) [70]
languages n
(2016) (/km2) (PPP)
[69]
Ethiopia
Federal Afar Head of State: Sahle-
Democra Ethiopian Amharic Work Zewde
1 January
tic Addis Ababa 1,104,300 105,163,988 92.7 3,719 0.498 birr (BR) Oromo Head of
2024
Republic (ETB) Somali Government: Abiy
of Tigrinya Ahmed
Ethiopia
GDP
Populatio Densit per
Fla Area HDI[57] Official Accessio
Country Capital n y cap. Currency Leaders
g (km2) [70]
languages n
(2016) (/km2) (PPP)
[69]
Head of
State: Mohamed bin
United Zayed Al Nahyan
UAE 1 January
Arab Abu Dhabi 83,600 9,282,410[72] 121 88,962 0.911 Arabic Head of
dirham (AED) 2024
Emirates Government: Moham
med bin Rashid Al
Maktoum
Brazil Brasília 8,515,767 217,140,790 26 20,079 0.754 Brazilian Portuguese Head of State: Luiz Septembe
Federativ real (R$) also Inácio Lula da Silva r 2006
e (BRL) see Languages
Republic
GDP
Populatio Densit per
Fla Area HDI[57] Official Accessio
Country Capital n y cap. Currency Leaders
g (km2) [70]
languages n
(2016) (/km2) (PPP)
[69]
of Brazil of Brazil
Head of
Russia Russian
Russian State: Vladimir Putin
Russian 17,075,40 also Septembe
Moscow 146,519,759 8.3 35,310 0.798 rouble (₽) Head of
Federatio 0 see Languages r 2006
(RUB) Government: Mikhail
n of Russia
Mishustin
Standard
Chinese[71]
China[b] written Head of State: Xi
Renminbi (Chine
People's 9,640,011 1,374,820,0 in simplified Jinping Septembe
Beijing [c]
139.6 23,309 0.727 se yuan, ¥)
Republic 00 characters[71] Head of r 2006
(CNY)
of China see Government: Li Qiang
also languages
of China
Map key:
Member States
Applicant
While there is currently no formal application process to join BRICS, any hopeful government must receive the unanimous backing of all member states to receive an
invitation. It was not until the early 2020s that discussions regarding allowing new states to join the club were widely held. Leaders and senior diplomats from the
participating members began to discuss the prospect of adding additional members to the organization at that point. [73][74][75]
In August 2023, at the 15th BRICS Summit, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates had been invited to join the organisation on 1 January 2024.[47][48]
On 30 December 2023, the new government of Argentina, which formally submitted an application for BRICS membership under Alberto Fernández's government in
2022, officially declined the offer to join the bloc due to the new government's different foreign policy. [50][76]
On 1 January 2024, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates officially joined the bloc. [
1 - Applied in 2023.
[86]
2 - Applied in 2022, Expected to join in 2nd expansion round.
Potential candidates
In addition, the following countries have expressed interest in joining BRICS: [87]
Financial architecture
The New Development Bank (NDB) is based in Shanghai. The New Development Bank (NDB) and Contingent Reserve
Arrangement (CRA) were signed into treaty at the 2014 BRICS summit in Brazil. Equal distribution of shares between the shareholders of the
NDB
The financial architecture of BRICS is made of the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA). These components were signed into
treaty in 2014 and became active in 2015.
The New Development Bank (NDB), formally referred to as the BRICS Development Bank, [93] is a multilateral development bank operated by the five BRICS states. The
bank's primary focus of lending is infrastructure projects[94][95] with authorized lending of up to $34 billion annually.[95] South Africa hosts the African headquarters of
the bank.[96] The bank has a starting capital of $50 billion, with wealth increased to $100 billion over time.[97] Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa initially
contributed $10 billion each to bring the total to $50 billion.[96][97] As of 2020, it had 53 projects under way worth around $15 billion.[98]
In 2021, Bangladesh, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Uruguay joined the NDB.[99]
At the 2015 BRICS summit in Russia, ministers from the BRICS states initiated consultations for a payment system that would be an alternative to the SWIFT system.
The stated goal was to initially move to settlements in national currencies.[103] The Central Bank of Russia highlighted the main benefits as backup and redundancy in
case there were disruptions to the SWIFT system.[104]
China also launched its own alternative to SWIFT: the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, which enables financial institutions worldwide to send and receive
information about financial transactions.[105] India also has its alternative Structured Financial Messaging System (SFMS), as do Russia SPFS and Brazil Pix.[citation needed]
BRICS countries committed to study the feasibility of a new common currency or similar, at the 2023 BRICS summit in South Africa.[106][107][108] Fair and
easier international trade as well as a major reduction in costs of transactions would be some of the reasons why the countries could forge a currency union.[109]
Reception
The five leaders of BRICS in Brasília, Brazil, in 2019 Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro welcoming the BRICS leaders
In 2012, Hu Jintao, the then General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and President of China, described the BRICS countries as defenders and promoters of
developing countries and a force for world peace.[110] Western analysts have highlighted potential divisions and weaknesses in the grouping, including significant
economic instabilities,[111][112][113][114] disagreements among the members over the UN Security Council reform,[115] and India and China's disputes[116] over territorial
issues.[117]
On 9 April 2013, Isobel Coleman, director of the Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy Program at the American think tank Council on Foreign Relations, and later U.S.
representative to the UN, claimed that the BRICS members share a lack of consensus. They uphold drastically different political systems, from a vibrant democracy in
Brazil to entrenched oligarchy in Russia, and their economies are little integrated and are different in size by orders of magnitude. She also claimed that the significant
difference in GDP influences the reserves: China accounts for over 41% of the contribution, which in turn leads to its bigger political say within the association. [118]
In 2014, the Indian Marxist author Vijay Prashad raised the limitations of the BRICS as a political and economic "locomotive of the South" because they
follow neoliberal policies. They have established neither new counter-balancing institutions nor come up with an alternative ideology. Furthermore, the BRICS project,
argues Prashad, has no ability to challenge the primacy of the United States and NATO.[119]
After the 2023 BRICS Summit, Con Coughlin, defence and foreign affairs editor at The Daily Telegraph, claimed "the challenge BRICS presents to the established world
order seems destined to failure" and accused the organization of being used by China as a vehicle for expanding its global influence. Coughlin also noted the
contradictions within the organization, such as the border dispute between China and India, and called for greater Western engagement with India as part of a new
strategic alliance.[16]
A multi-year study at Tufts University found that the "common portrayal of BRICS as a China-dominated group primarily pursuing anti-U.S. agendas is misplaced ... The
BRICS countries connect around common development interests and a quest for a multipolar world order in which no single power dominates. Yet BRICS consolidation
has turned the group into a potent negotiation force that now challenges Washington's geopolitical and economic goals". [120]
According to Thomas Hill, Atlantic Council, the de-dollarization efforts within BRICS, particularly in North Africa, present a significant challenge to US interests. The
inclusion of Egypt and the enthusiasm in Algiers and Tunis suggest that North African states may actively support BRICS's priority of de-dollarization. This poses a
threat to the US, as a coordinated de-dollarization effort in the region could diminish American influence and impact existing trade agreements. The expansion of
BRICS raises concerns for US policymakers, given the group's commitment to global de-dollarization, which aims to replace the dollar with the "R5" or “the renminbi,
ruble, rupee, real, and rand”, or with other multilateral central bank digital currency (CBDC) as the new global currency. This shift could limit the US ability to run
deficits and maintain low interest rates. Moreover, de-dollarization would undermine the effectiveness of US sanctions, relying on the SWIFT system, as BRICS seeks
alternative financial systems, potentially making SWIFT obsolete.[121]
The theme of the 11th BRICS summit was "BRICS: economic growth for an innovative future", and the priorities of the Brazilian Pro Tempore Presidency for 2019 are
the following – Strengthening of the cooperation in Science, technology and innovation; Enhancement of the cooperation on digital economy; Invigoration of the
cooperation on the fight against transnational crime, especially against organized crime, money laundering and drug trafficking; Encouragement to the rapprochement
between the New Development Bank (NDB) and the BRICS Business Council.[123]
Currently the new President Pro Tempore is Russia and their goals are: investing into BRICS countries in order to strengthen everyone's economies, cooperating in the
energy and environmental industries, helping with young children and coming up with resolutions on migration and peacekeeping. [124]
Current leaders
Image
Name Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva Vladimir Putin Narendra Modi Xi Jinping Cyril Ramaphosa
Name Abdel Fattah el-Sisi Abiy Ahmed Ebrahim Raisi Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan
Position President of Egypt Prime Minister of Ethiopia President of Iran President of the United Arab Emirates
show
v
t
e
BRICS
hide
hide
v
t
e
Economic
Energy
Food
Hard
Maritime
Types National
Politics
Realpolitik
Sharp
Smart
Soft
Small
Middle
Status
Regional
Emerging
Least Great
Great
Potential
Super
American (Pax)
Asian
Geopolitics
Chinese (Pax)
Indian
Post-Western era
Balance of power
o European
Deterrence theory
Theory
Hegemonic stability theory
Philosophy of power
Polarity
Power projection
Second Superpower
Sphere of influence
Superpower collapse
Superpower disengagement
hide
African Union
Africa
Union for the Mediterranean
Arab League
Africa–Asia Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC)
The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation
Asia (BIMSTEC)
Africa–Asia–
Union for the Mediterranean
Europe
Africa–South
South Atlantic Peace and Cooperation Zone
America
Commonwealth of Nations
Non–regional
Community of Portuguese Speaking Countries
E9
G4
G7
G8
G8+5
G20
G24
G77
hide
v
t
e
International relations
League of Nations
Past
Warsaw Pact
1648–1814
1814–1919
1919–1939
History
Diplomatic history of World War II
Cold War
Alliance
o Entente
Concepts
o Coalition
o Military
Appeasement
Co-belligerence
Collective security
Colonialism
Deterrence theory
Grey-zone
Hegemony
Idealism
International community
Internationalism
Liberal institutionalism
Neutral country
Non-belligerent
Non-state actor
Imperialism
Peace
Power
Sovereignty
Suzerainty
Treaty
o Armistice
o Ceasefire
War
Constructivism
English school
Feminism
Theory Liberalism
Marxism
Postcolonialism
Realism
Comparative politics
Diplomacy
hide
v
t
e
Emerging markets
First World
Fourth World
Geopolitics Decolonization
Cold War
Neocolonialism
Multipolarity
o Durban I
o Durban II
o Durban III
Globalization
Post-Western era
Debt
BancoSur
Developmental state
Infrastructure-based development
Sustainable development
Generic drugs
o biosimilar
o criticism
G-5
G-77
G-15
D-8
G-24
G-11
Organization
s G-90
and groups
Non-Aligned Movement
African Union
Afro–Asian Conference
Colombo Plan
North–South Summit
South Centre
Brandt Report
Fair trade
Financial regulation
hide
v
t
e
Foreign relations of Brazil
hide
Bilateral relations
Algeria
Angola
Cape Verde
DR Congo
Egypt
Ethiopia
Guinea-Bissau
Africa
Kenya
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
South Africa
Tanzania
Argentina
Americas
Barbados
Bolivia
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Guyana
Haiti
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Paraguay
Peru
Suriname
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
China
East Timor
Georgia
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Kazakhstan
Lebanon
Malaysia
North Korea
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Qatar
South Korea
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
Albania
Austria
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Europe Greece
Holy See
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Lithuania
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Australia
Oceania
New Zealand
Former Yugoslavia
hide
Multilateral relations
European Union
United Nations
G4
G8+5
G20
BRICS
IBSA
CPLP
Mercosur
Unasul
hide
Diplomacy
UNSC reform
Brazilian Antarctica
Treaties of Brazil
Ambassadors of Brazil
hide
v
t
e
hide
Bilateral relations
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Africa Cameroon
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Libya
Madagascar
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Seychelles
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Tanzania
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Americas Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Ecuador
Guatemala
Guyana
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
United States
o Russian Empire
o Soviet Union
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
China
East Timor
Georgia
o Abkhazia
o South Ossetia
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
o Kurdistan Region
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
North Korea
Oman
Pakistan
Palestine
o Hamas
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Thailand
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen
Albania
Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Europe Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Moldova
o Transnistria
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
o Donetsk PR
o Luhansk PR
United Kingdom
Vatican City
Oceania Australia
Fiji
Nauru
New Zealand
Tonga
Vanuatu
hide
Multilateral relations
BRICS
European Union
NATO
United Nations
Near Abroad
hide
Diplomacy
Military Cooperation
Treaties
Military doctrine
hide
v
t
e
hide
Bilateral relations
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burundi
Cape Verde
Cameroon
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Equatorial Guinea
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bolivia
Americas
Brazil
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Saint Lucia
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
China
o Hong Kong
o Tibet
East Timor
Georgia
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
North Korea
Oman
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Thailand
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen
Albania
Europe Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Holy See
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kosovo
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Moldova
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Oceania Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Nauru
New Zealand
o Cook Islands
o Niue
Palau
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Soviet Union
Former
Yugoslavia
hide
Multilateral relations
ASEAN
Africa (Summit)
BIMSTEC
BBIN
Central Asia
Commonwealth of Nations
European Union
G4
G20
IBSA
Indian Ocean Naval Symposium
Mekong–Ganga Cooperation
Sanctions
SAARC
United Nations
hide
Diplomacy
History
o Minister
o Foreign Secretary
Indian diaspora
Overseas citizens
Foreign policy
o ITEC programme
Asian
Middle Eastern
South Asian
Act East)
Kashmir conflict
Siachen conflict
o Jawaharlal Nehru
o Indira Gandhi
o Manmohan Singh
o Narendra Modi
hide
v
t
e
hide
Bilateral relations
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Africa
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Bolivia
Brazil
Americas
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Grenada
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Peru
Suriname
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
East Timor
Georgia
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
o history
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
North Korea
o History
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
o History
Sri Lanka
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Thailand
Turkey
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
o Northern Domination
Yemen
Europe Albania
Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kosovo
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Moldova
Montenegro
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
San Marino
Serbia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Vatican City
Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Micronesia
Nauru
New Zealand
Oceania
Niue
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Vanuatu
hide
Multilateral relations
BCIM Economic Corridor
BIMSTEC
Africa
Arab League
BRICS
Caribbean
China–Japan–South Korea
European Union
Latin America
Oceania
Third World
United Nations
hide
Diplomacy
Chinese Century
Confucius Institute
Nine-dash line
Panda diplomacy
o Chinese unification
Stadium diplomacy
String of Pearls
o Albania
o Soviet
Theater diplomacy
hide
v
t
e
hide
Bilateral relations
Africa Algeria
Angola
Botswana
Egypt
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Ghana
Kenya
Lesotho
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sahrawi Republic
Tanzania
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Americas Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Cuba
Mexico
Peru
United States
Uruguay
Asia Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
China
Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Japan
Malaysia
North Korea
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Sri Lanka
Taiwan
Turkey
Europe Bulgaria
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Russia
Serbia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Australia
Oceania
New Zealand
hide
Multilateral relations
European Union
Commonwealth of Nations
BRICS
G8+5
G20
IBSA
SACU
African Union
hide
Diplomacy
UNSC reform
hide
v
t
e
Africa Djibouti
Egypt
Eritrea
Kenya
Somalia
Somaliland
South Africa
Sudan
Brazil
Canada
Americas Cuba
Mexico
United States
Asia Azerbaijan
China
India
Indonesia
Israel
Japan
Malaysia
Palestine
Qatar
Turkey
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Europe Kosovo
Norway
Russia
Poland
Serbia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Former Yugoslavia
hide
v
t
e
Africa Algeria
Burkina Faso
Egypt
Gambia
Ghana
Kenya
Libya
Morocco
Senegal
South Africa
Sudan
Tunisia
Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Cuba
Americas Ecuador
Mexico
United States
o after 1979
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
China
Georgia
o History
India
Indonesia
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lebanon
Malaysia
North Korea
Oman
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Tajikistan
Thailand
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen
Europe Albania
Belarus
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Holy See
Italy
Kosovo
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Oceania Australia
Rome
Former
Yugoslavia
Israeli–Sunni Coalition
Sanctions
o U.S. sanctions
Propaganda in Iran
Iranian diaspora
hide
v
t
e
show
Bilateral relations
show
Multilateral relations
hide
v
t
e
show
Bilateral relations
show
Multilateral relations
show
Disputes
show
Related topics
hide
v
t
e
China–India relations
o Forward policy
o Internment of Chinese-Indians
1987 skirmish
2020–2021 skirmishes
o Timeline
Depsang Bulge
Doklam
Dolam
Sirijap
Trans-Karakoram Tract
o Sino-Pakistan Agreement
Infrastructure
o Roads
BRICS
o BRIC
Economic
BASIC
relations
BCIM Economic Corridor
India–Taiwan relations
India–Tibet relations
Chindia
Chinas
China–India railway
o Tan Yun-Shan
Zhengyou
Cholas-Chinese relations
Tamil-Chinese relations
Category:China–India relations
hide
v
t
e
China–Russia relations
Embassy of China, Moscow
Diplomatic
Ambassadors of Russia to China
posts
Consulate General of Russia, Shanghai
BRICS
o BRIC
Vostok 2018
Military
Chinese missile warning system
relations
Marine Security Belt
o Outer Manchuria
Cyrillization of Chinese
Li Yueran
Category:China–Russia relations
hide
International VIAF
National Catalonia
Germany
Israel
United States
Czech Republic
Poland
Categories:
BRICS
2000s neologisms
Brazil–China relations
Brazil–India relations
Brazil–Russia relations
China–India relations
China–Russia relations
India–Russia relations