Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 1
Lesson 1
Lesson 1
TOPICS1in
Thoughts of the Educational Philosophers: of Curriculum
1. John Locke: The Empiricist Educator
2. Herbert Spencer: The Utilitarian Education
3. John Dewey: Learning through Experience
4. George Counts: Building a New Social Order
5. Theodore Brameld: Social Reconstructionism
6. Paulo Freire: Critical Pedagogy
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the lesson, you should be able to discuss the six
philosophical thoughts on education.
Comments:
For John Locke education is not acquisition of knowledge contained in the Great
Books. It is learners interaction with concrete experience, comparing and
reflecting on the same concrete experience, comparing. The learner is an active
not a passive agent of his/her own learning.
From the social dimension, education is seeing citizens participate actively and
intelligently in establishing their government and in choosing who will govern
them from among themselves because they are convinced that no one person is
destined to be ruler forever.
Activity
Task/Activity
A. Below are some empiricism philosophies, do you agree or not? Explain your answer by
providing educational situations on the space provided.
Comments:
Specialized Education of Spencer vs. General Education
To survive in a complex society, Spencer favors specialized education over that
of general education. We are in need of social engineers who can combine
harmoniously the findings of specialized knowledge. This is particularly true in
the field of medicine.
The expert who concentrates on a limited field is useful. But if he loses sight of
the interdependence of things he becomes a man who knows more and more
about less and less. We must be warned of the deadly peril of over specialism.
Of course we do not prefer the other extreme, the superficial person who knows
less and less about more and more.
Comments:
The Fund of Knowledge of the Human Race
Dewey does not disregard the accumulated wisdom of the past. These past ideas,
discoveries and inventions, our cultural heritage, will be used as the material for
dealing with problems and so will be tested. If they are of help, they become part
of a reconstructed experience. If they are not totally accurate, they will still be
part of a reconstructed experience. This means that the ideal learner for Dewey
is not just one who can learn by doing e.g., conduct an experiment but one who
can connect accumulated wisdom of the past to the present.
School are For the People and By the People
Schools are democratic institutions where everyone regardless of age, ethnicity,
social status is welcome and is encouraged to participate in the democratic
process of decision-making. Learners and stakeholders practice and experience
democracy in schools.
Task/Activity
A. Brainstorming Activity: In a group of four, discuss the Educational Theories of
John Dewey that significantly affects the learning of students. Present
consolidated output in the google class.
Comments:
Schools and Teachers as Agents of Change
For George Counts, schools and teachers should be agents of change. Schools
are considered instruments for social improvement rather than as agencies for
preserving the status quo. Whatever change we work for should always be
change for the better not just change for the sake of change.
Teachers are called to make decisions on controversial issues.
Not to make a decision is to actually making a decision.
Like Dewey, problem solving, should be the dominant method for instruction.
Comments:
Like John Dewey and George Counts, social reconstructionist Brameld believe in
active problem- solving as the method of teaching and learning.
Social reconstructionists are convinced that education is not a privilege of the
few but a right to be enjoyed by all.
Education is a right that all citizens regardless of race and social status must
enjoy.
Task/Activity
A. Examine the statement of Theodore Brameld, analyze how this affects the
adaptation of school system into technological era.
“I have never been comfortable in the inner sanctums of pure scholarship for
too long a period. The air is not sufficiently saturated with the oxygen of
everyday human life. So all the way through my professional years, I have
found time both to study philosophy and to relate theory to practice.”
Paulo Freire was born in 1921 in Recife, Brazil. In 1947 he began work with adult illiterates in
North-East Brazil and gradually evolved a method of work with which the
word conscientization has been associated. Until 1964 he was Professor
of History and Philosophy of Education in the University of Recife and in
the 1960s he was involved with a popular education movement to deal
with massive illiteracy. From 1962 there were widespread experiments
with his method and the movement was extended under the patronage of the federal
government. In 1963-4 there were courses for co-ordinators in all Brazilian states and a plan
was drawn up for the establishment of 2000 cultural circles to reach 2,000,000 illiterates. Freire
was imprisoned following the 1964 coup d’etat for what the new regime considered to be
subversive elements in his teaching. He next appeared in exile in Chile where his method was
used and the UN School of Political Sciences held seminars on his work. In 1969-70 he was
Visiting Professor at the Centre for the Study of Development and Social Change at Harvard
University.
Paulo Freire was one of the most influential philosophers of education of the twentieth
century. He worked wholeheartedly to help people both through his philosophy and his practice
of critical pedagogy. A native of Brazil, Freire’s goal was to eradicate illiteracy among people
from previously colonized countries and continents. His insights were rooted in the social and
political realities of the children and grandchildren of former slaves. His ideas, life, and work
served to ameliorate the living conditions of oppressed people.
Comment:
All of these education philosophers, point to the need of interacting with others
and of creating a “community of inquiry” as Charles Sander Peirce put it. The
community of inquiry is “a group of persons involved in inquiry, investigating
more or less the same question or problem, and developing through their
exchanges a better understanding both of the question as well as the probable
solution.” (Lee, 2010) A community of inquiry will engage learners in active
problem solving.
Task/Activity
A. Reflect on the readings of Paulo Freire in Moacir Gadotti’s book, “I didn’t
understand anything because of my hunger. I wasn’t dumb. It wasn’t lack of
interest. My social condition didn’t allow me to have an education. Experience
showed me once again the relationship between social class and knowledge”.