Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problems of Ethnomusicology by Constantin Brăiloiu
Problems of Ethnomusicology by Constantin Brăiloiu
Lloyd
Review by: Vic Gammon
Folk Music Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1 (1985), pp. 107-109
Published by: English Folk Dance + Song Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4522188 .
Accessed: 17/12/2013 14:32
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
English Folk Dance + Song Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Folk
Music Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
The essays in the book, written between I93I and I960, are grouped in a
thematic way. The first eight are compiled under the heading 'Method and
Criticism', the last four under the heading 'System'. In addition there is an end-
piece consisting of A. L. Lloyd's translation of funeral songs from the Romanian
village of Gorj, strange and wonderful material that Brailoiu collected and wrote
about. One of the essays in the first section of the book 'On a Romanian ballad'
deals with the similarities and connections between funeral and marriage rites. It is
a fascinating and wonderfully concise piece of ethnological writing but it stands
out in the book for its anthropological approach. Generally speaking Brailoiu's
work favours musicological approaches to the exclusion of others.
The style of writing is learned, at times turgid but at others bright and amusing.
Brailoiu has an excellent line in the examination and exposition of other people's
arguments that points up their inconsistencies and unexamined assumptions. I
actually found myself laughing in the middle of a long section on the pentatonic
scale, not something I would have anticipated.
Key themes emerge from Brailoiu's writing some of which are familiar through
the writing of Lloyd and others. Some of these themes appear dated and
unimportant now but others are recurringpoints of discussion. His refutation of
Rezeptionstheorie (the idea that the folk create nothing but merely take from the
cultural goods of their social superiors) is thorough and convincing. His
uncompromising critique of approaches to traditional music based on assumptions
drawn from the Western classical music tradition remains valid. Problems of the
relationship between musicology and ethnomusicology, a relationship marked by
incomprehension and intolerance, remain as real today as when Brailoiu addressed
the subject in 1958. In contrast his assertion that exposure to exotic and popular
music has widened western musical sensibility strikes me as over optimistic.
The essay 'Outline of a method of musical folklore', although dating from
I93I, can still be read with profit by anyone contemplating or engaged in
fieldwork. Brailoiu's idea of a thorough study of the musical life of one community,
using a variety of methods, seems amazingly ambitious to people in a country
where the latter discovery of one important traditional singer is considered an
event of great importance. Perhaps we are studying the wrong kinds of musical
activities? Brailoiu would have said we were not, for he defined what he studied as
the study of music of peasant origin as opposed to the study of peasant musical life
which he considered properly the realm of sociology. This definition and its built-in
assumptions have significant ramifications for Brailoiu's work. To him an 'ideal
informant' is one possessed of an 'archaic repertory', he is excited by the prospect
of using traditional music to enlighten our ignorance of the history of pre-written
music, he even feels it is too easy to make fun of those 'who see everywhere nothing
but survivals of dead paganism' when clearly survivals are all around us. Yet he is a
man of contrasts, scientist as well as romantic. He hesitates but ultimately declares
'the folklorist should not do otherwise than to collect everything if he wants to give
a faithful picture of the real musical situation'.
The heart of Brailoiu's ideas on musical folklore is his notion of system. The
musical investigator is able to discover 'a coherent group of procedures ruled by
intelligible laws. Though they have never been codified and their bearers know
nothing of them, these laws . . . often astonish us by their rigour'. In another place